Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 8060S

AMD Radeon 8060S

AMD Radeon RX 8060S 是 AMD Strix Halo APU(例如:AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395)的集成显卡。 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395).它提供全部 40 个 CU,图形时钟频率高达 2.9 GHz,采用全新的 RDNA 3.5 架构。GPU 支持多达 4 个显示器,HDR 分辨率高达 8k60。

根据基准和游戏的不同,快速 iGPU 的定位介于 RTX 4060 和 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU 之间,因此可以在要求最苛刻的游戏中以 FHD 最高细节进行游戏(见下文基准)。

图形处理器内置在 APU 中,采用台积电的现代 4 纳米工艺制造。

AMD Radeon 8000S Series

Radeon 8060S 40 @ 2.9 GHz
Radeon 8050S 32 @ 2.8 GHz
Radeon 8040S 16 @ 2.8 GHz
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines40 - unified
Raytracing Cores40
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement06.01.2025
CPU in Radeon 8060SGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 39516 x 3000 MHz, 55 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 39516 x 3000 MHz, 55 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 39212 x 3200 MHz, 55 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 3888 x 3600 MHz, 55 W? MHz2900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
11.1 pt (33%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 1343     avg: 1933     median: 2018 (14%)     max: 2043 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 1874     avg: 2366     median: 2187 (15%)     max: 2830 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 9653     avg: 9760     median: 9759.5 (22%)     max: 9866 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
75471 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
19615 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 47271     avg: 50073     median: 50103 (23%)     max: 51660 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 23537     avg: 25791     median: 26317 (40%)     max: 27328 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 25992     avg: 29140     median: 29755 (27%)     max: 31461 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 551952     avg: 590297     median: 587930 (65%)     max: 631765 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 10303     avg: 10842     median: 11002 (29%)     max: 11284 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 10224     avg: 10946     median: 11125 (23%)     max: 11601 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -99%
...
9943 -9%
10043 -8%
10046 -8%
10206 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
10301 -6%
10455 -4%
10478 -4%
10681 -2%
10783 -1%
AMD Radeon 8060S
10946
11067 1%
11529 5%
11609 6%
11837 8%
11850 8%
12640 15%
12806 17%
13241 21%
15184 39%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 113%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 309%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 564912     avg: 603603     median: 581054 (59%)     max: 661643 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 492180     avg: 526370     median: 510811 (60%)     max: 573969 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 66462     avg: 69453     median: 68183 (64%)     max: 75011 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 140137     avg: 165507     median: 167690 (41%)     max: 180897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 60321     avg: 67502     median: 67964 (64%)     max: 70470 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 95554     avg: 121517     median: 127166 (49%)     max: 130941 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 31410     avg: 33801     median: 33493 (41%)     max: 37011 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 39130     avg: 44148     median: 44735 (34%)     max: 49668 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 92510     avg: 99720     median: 100132 (29%)     max: 104503 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 94006     avg: 103283     median: 104002 (57%)     max: 108949 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 62357     avg: 75005     median: 79048.5 (87%)     max: 79566 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
54320 -28%
55811 -26%
61133 -18%
61850 -18%
62666 -16%
64892 -13%
68580 -9%
68868 -8%
69623 -7%
AMD Radeon 8060S
75005
...
68868 -8%
max:
87172 16%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
16087 points (21%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 63153     avg: 65779     median: 65511.5 (86%)     max: 68778 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 77.4     avg: 103.5     median: 109.6 (33%)     max: 111.1 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 198.09     avg: 205.8     median: 207.5 (51%)     max: 210 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 202     avg: 203.1     median: 202.7 (30%)     max: 205 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 100     avg: 107.8     median: 102.1 (18%)     max: 127 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 134.14     avg: 138.8     median: 137.5 (35%)     max: 146 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 176.58     avg: 195.1     median: 200.5 (55%)     max: 203 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 37.12     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (34%)     max: 39.8 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 108     avg: 112.9     median: 111.8 (45%)     max: 120 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 268.37     avg: 271.1     median: 271 (45%)     max: 274 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 261     avg: 264     median: 265 (40%)     max: 266 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 182.5     avg: 195.4     median: 200 (54%)     max: 201 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 347.62     avg: 363.6     median: 367 (41%)     max: 370.49 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 100     avg: 110.1     median: 102.6 (17%)     max: 127 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 338.6     avg: 390.2     median: 403 (69%)     max: 407 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 296.56     avg: 326.8     median: 332.5 (38%)     max: 345.46 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 75.34     avg: 81.4     median: 82.9 (27%)     max: 85 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 266.46     avg: 282.8     median: 289 (42%)     max: 292.53 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 317.33     avg: 368.9     median: 378.2 (42%)     max: 389 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 226.84     avg: 243.9     median: 246 (38%)     max: 253 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
min: 107.66     avg: 108.5     median: 108.5 (32%)     max: 109.27 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
min: 244.94     avg: 250.6     median: 250.6 (44%)     max: 256.27 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 347.04     avg: 363.2     median: 367 (41%)     max: 370 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 179.43     avg: 203.1     median: 205.2 (57%)     max: 211 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 451.54     avg: 482.6     median: 490 (52%)     max: 494.97 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 73.87     avg: 81.6     median: 82.7 (13%)     max: 85.2 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 139.87     avg: 152.9     median: 155 (53%)     max: 166 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 96.03     avg: 103.3     median: 105 (51%)     max: 105.22 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 121.01     avg: 126     median: 126 (33%)     max: 129 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 219.76     avg: 226.4     median: 226.2 (23%)     max: 233 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 73.78     avg: 85.2     median: 87.5 (56%)     max: 90.1 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 177.63     avg: 188.8     median: 189 (27%)     max: 196 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 30.56     avg: 58.6     median: 73.7 (16%)     max: 76 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 88.78     avg: 94.6     median: 95.5 (43%)     max: 101 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 63.6     avg: 68.3     median: 69.1 (45%)     max: 70.3 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 68.19     avg: 71.4     median: 71.3 (24%)     max: 73.6 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 20510     avg: 22203     median: 22150 (16%)     max: 24627 points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 348     avg: 390.2     median: 398.4 (23%)     max: 404 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
114.1 fps (43%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
283.8 fps (51%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
705 fps (52%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
709 fps (67%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 735     median: 315 (8%)     max: 1528 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 79.7     median: 104 (19%)     max: 143.6 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 83773     avg: 90339     median: 88213 (22%)     max: 98987 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 76551     avg: 83288     median: 83390 (21%)     max: 90400 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 2396     avg: 3188     median: 3210.5 (12%)     max: 3789 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 6893     avg: 8492     median: 8920 (16%)     max: 9249 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 16723     avg: 17791     median: 17969 (15%)     max: 18731 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 109     avg: 150.5     median: 157.3 (21%)     max: 208 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
110.5 Watt (15%)
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (76%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 109.3     avg: 111.3     median: 110.9 (31%)     max: 113.7 Watt
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 103.5     avg: 148.8     median: 158.9 (20%)     max: 195.1 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4172     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.66 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 46.4     avg: 52.6     median: 47.4 (68%)     max: 70 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
94.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
166.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
38.9  fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
52.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
228 233 235 236 239 ~ 234 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
190.5 202 204 207 208 ~ 202 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
151.7 162.9 163.1 165.7 168.5 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
42.4
45.4
low 1920x1080
57.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
91.5 101.3 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
77.5 81.4 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
61.3 62.5 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
24.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
71 72 72 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56 67 67 68 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47 57 57 57 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25 33 33 34 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17 22 22 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
30 33 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
23 23 39 40 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
370 386 ~ 378 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
154.2 183.5 185.5 ~ 174 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
94.7 106.6 117.6 ~ 106 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
63.1 69.5 70 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
30.9 35.9 36.5 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
51.7 64 64.4 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
98.1 116.5 117.4 ~ 111 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
55.8 59.8 68.4 71.1 71.5 72.3 72.6 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 50.2 60.1 61.7 61.7 62 62.9 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.5 39.2 46.7 47 47.3 47.4 49.1 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28.8 33.7 33.9 34 34.2 35.6 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.9 18.4 18.4 18.6 18.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
lowest, FSR Quality, Frame Generation 1920x1080
97.9
lowest, XeSS Quality 1920x1080
58.5
low 1920x1080
135.8 138.4 ~ 137 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
86.7 101.7 102.9 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
69.7 83.3 85.6 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.5 58.4 58.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.6 41.2 41.4 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.6 22.3 22.4 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
26 31.5 31.7 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
44.4 52.8 52.9 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
76.7 77.2 87 92.3 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
49.4 58.9 65.4 65.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.3 54.1 59.8 64.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
27.4 33.4 42 57.6 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
23.3 36.6 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
48.4 50.6 54.7 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra + FSR Quality + FG 2560x1440
69.8
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
69.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
49.4 61.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.4 52.8 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35.9 45.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
26 33.6 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
13 18.9 ~ 16 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
34.3 45.8 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
65.7 81.3 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
92.5
Epic Preset + Quality FSR 3840x2160
27.2
low 1920x1080
160 169 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
155 160 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104 123 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
83 92 111 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64 65 80 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35 46 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
59 72 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
79 101 114 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
186
182
Extreme Preset + FSR3 Quality 2560x1440
87
85
low 1920x1080
91.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
71 84.2 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
54.8 72.6 ~ 64 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.4 54.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.2 45.2 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19 28.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
17.6 21.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
29.2 37 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
90.6
low 1920x1080
94.3 111.8 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
77.2 96.4 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65.8 82.8 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59.7 76.1 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
45.8 57.5 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
33.2 38.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
53  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
49.7 61.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
128.2
low 1920x1080
84.4 87.3 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
81.8 82.4 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.1 68.2 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
60.2 61.3 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
38.1 39.2 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
20.1 20.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
31.6 31.7 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
57.3 57.7 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Super Resolution off) 1280x720
120.3
123.4
low 1920x1080
80.9 82.4 83.7 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
56.6 73.6 74.9 80.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
52.7 67.5 67.5 74.8 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.6 51.2 66.6 67.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
26.2 40.2 46.5 48.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.9 26.1 26.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
33.4 38.7 39.3 39.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
50.2 56.6 60.4 60.5 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
83.5
87.6
85.3
low 1920x1080 cinem.
55.2 55.2 55.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
50.1 50.3 51.3 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
44.2 44.4 44.6 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
32.7 36.2 36.3 38.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
23.1 26 26.2 28.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160 cinem.
14.7 14.8 17.1 ~ 16 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160 cinem.
23.3 23.5 23.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440 cinem.
33.3 37.6 37.8 46.9 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1280x720 cinem.
64
67
low 1920x1080
81 87 91 91 92 93 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62 67 68 69 69 70 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46 50 51 52 52 53 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25 27 28 28 29 29 29 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18 20 21 21 21 21 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12 12 12 12 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
28 29 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
113
140
141
low 1920x1080
189.6 193.3 ~ 191 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
118.5 124.1 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
99.2 101.3 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
85.4 88.2 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
50.3 51.8 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
24.3 24.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
20.6 21.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
270
266
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + FSR Quality 2560x1440
39.1
39.4
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
207 225 258 265 265 269 270 282 ~ 255 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
185.6 208 243 243 247 248 250 251 ~ 234 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
147.7 168.2 186.3 187.5 190 191.2 193.1 194 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46 52.5 57.4 58.1 58.5 58.5 59 59.5 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28.8 34.4 37.1 37.9 38 38.5 38.7 38.8 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13 18.8 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
33.2 33.5 33.9 34 34.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
61.3 61.9 62.3 62.4 62.7 62.7 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
24.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
21.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
39.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
78.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
60.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.7 57.5 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
38.3 43.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
25.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
44.8 52.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
67.7
high 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
23.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
86.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
82.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
81.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
31  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
355  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
355  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
245  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
147.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
67 75 75 76 78 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61 68 68 69 70 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53 59 59 59 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 44 44 45 45 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26 29 29 30 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13 15 15 15 15 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
123
120
125
122
110
low 1920x1080
76.2 81.4 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
67 75.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64.8 69.1 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42.6 45 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
111.6
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
19.2
low 1920x1080
93.6 95.1 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
86 87 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
72.2 72.2 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
54 55.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
36 36.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.9 19.1 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
151
154.8
low 1920x1080
313.6 320.9 ~ 317 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
206.2 211 ~ 209 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
131.4 134.6 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109.5 109.5 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
78 83 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40 40.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
423
448
med. 1920x1080
215  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
122.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
94.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
70.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
35.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
124.8 133.3 133.9 135.4 148.1 148.7 149 150 152.1 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105.3 108.3 111.5 119 124.4 124.4 125.1 125.2 128.3 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
85 87.6 90.2 97.7 97.9 99.7 100 100.3 101.7 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75.6 79.5 80.7 86.1 87.3 89.6 89.7 90 92.1 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46.4 48.4 49.4 51.4 53.9 54.3 54.5 54.6 55.4 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.8 20 21.7 22.1 22.2 22.3 22.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
160.6
163.8
168.8
172.7
180.1
169.6
171.6
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
25
27.3
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
94.1
106.4
105
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
8.1
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
63.6
72.6
81.4
80.7
79.9
75.1
80.6
66.6
76.8
68.3
81
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
3.3
low 1920x1080
128.8 138.8 139.6 146 151 151.7 152.3 154.6 ~ 145 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
100.9 114.8 115.2 118.3 118.7 119.7 120.2 121.5 ~ 116 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
87.9 100.4 100.6 101.2 101.4 101.7 102.9 103.7 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
85.3 90.5 97.3 98.6 99.4 99.9 100.4 100.8 101.4 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
55.2 60.8 65.5 66.1 68.3 68.4 68.6 68.9 71.8 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
28.6 29.4 32.6 32.7 33 33 33.1 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K FSR 3840x2160
53.3 53.4 53.4 53.9 60.5 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
177.8
197.5
205
199.3
173.8
206
Ultra Preset + Quality FSR 2.2 2560x1440
91.6
93.7
89.8
103.3
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
177.2 180.3 ~ 179 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
155  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
132 137.3 ~ 135 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
114.2 117.2 ~ 116 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
72.3 74.8 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
36.5 36.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
250
241
low 1920x1080
97.8 98.3 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
94.6 95.4 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
80.3 81.4 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
79.9 80.7 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
51.9 52.3 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
25.2 25.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
123.9
129.4
low 1920x1080
186.6 194.1 194.3 194.4 ~ 192 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
162.2 162.6 163.1 164.4 ~ 163 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
141.2 141.4 142.3 144.8 ~ 142 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
118.2 120 121.2 123 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
76.1 76.6 77.1 77.1 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
36.7 37.2 37.5 37.7 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
250
259
261
270
RT Ultra Preset / On FXAA 1920x1080
28.6
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
250  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
239  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
185.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
374
low 1920x1080
220.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
162.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
110.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
282.1
low 1920x1080
116.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
96.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
76.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
39.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
135
low 1280x720
289 297 ~ 293 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
200 201 ~ 201 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
182 182 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
106 107 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87 88 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
58 58 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
227
226
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
142.3 150.9 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
115.8 121.8 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
106.4 109.3 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
104.1 104.3 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
83.4 84.5 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
46.2 46.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
129.5
135.5
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
135.6 137.9 171.7 176.9 ~ 156 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
112.9 114.3 143.6 146.9 ~ 129 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
87.1 91.7 103.2 107.5 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
50.4 55.6 56.8 57.9 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
44.3 49.5 50.2 51.5 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
36.2 37 37.4 40.2 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
125  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
77  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
51  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
212  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
150.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
149.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
135.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
90.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
198
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
453 484 491 546 566 608 610 613 ~ 546 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
218 221 224 260 277 278 280 ~ 251 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
188.6 192.7 198.2 215 229 229 231 231 ~ 214 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
167.9 171 176.8 187 196.4 196.8 197.7 199.1 ~ 187 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
104.1 109.9 113.1 121.9 122 122.1 122.3 123.8 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
57.6 58.6 61.2 61.8 61.9 62.4 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
116 146 148 ~ 137 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
96 114 115 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
95 108 113 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
92 100 101 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
87 89 ~ 88 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
49 50 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
130
129
low 1280x720
93 109.5 123.7 125 127.3 129.5 135.7 138.8 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.4 72.9 85.8 98.8 102.8 104.1 104.5 104.9 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.2 58.3 69 72.7 76.5 76.7 78 79.3 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.3 57.8 59 59.5 60.4 60.5 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
182.7 192.9 197.4 198.3 198.8 204 204 206 206 ~ 199 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117.6 121.9 122.6 126.2 132.3 132.3 137 137.7 144.5 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.8 84.9 86.6 91.8 93.3 94.7 96.3 96.6 96.7 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.3 63.4 63.6 67.8 69.4 69.5 70 70.5 70.6 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34.7 36.1 38.4 38.7 38.7 38.8 39.3 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
210 213 215 217 217.5 223 225.9 228 238.3 ~ 221 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
175.2 176 177.2 178.3 185.2 186.8 192.3 203.6 205 ~ 187 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
147.7 155.8 158.9 164.4 164.8 166 168.8 171.1 184.7 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
133.1 136 136.2 138.3 138.9 142 144.5 147.5 151.9 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
87 88.5 97.1 98 98.2 98.3 99.4 102 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
455 494 525 528 551 ~ 511 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
329 335 353 364 390 ~ 354 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
182.5 187 193.9 199.5 218 ~ 196 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
101 102.6 105.2 112.3 122.8 127.4 ~ 112 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
81.6 84 84.6 84.6 85.1 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
57.2 57.3 58.7 59 59.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
43.1
43.5
43.7
42.9
42.9
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
259
236
231
223
216
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
182.8 183.1 184.2 184.4 184.9 185.7 185.8 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
177.7 179.1 180 181.7 182.3 182.8 183.3 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
164.3 165.4 166.9 168.6 168.8 170.3 173.6 181.5 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
83.5 86.6 90.6 94.4 94.5 97 99.8 99.9 100.9 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64.3 68.6 75.2 75.7 76.5 77 77.2 77.3 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
72.9 78.6 78.8 79.5 80.2 80.3 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
31.3
34.8
35.3
35.8
35.5
34.4
35.3
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
175.5
179.3
181.1
180.1
181.5
181.9
179
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
183.1
184.8
185.8
184.8
185.4
185.5
185.6
183.4
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 117: Pax Romana94.972.25529.421.111.9
ARC Raiders166.6106.982.950.638.9
F1 2523420216227.913.6
Doom: The Dark Ages57.749.444.442.7
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered96796222.515.78.96
Assassin's Creed Shadows726555383120
Civilization 73781741066834
Monster Hunter Wilds6758443318
Kingdom Come Deliverance 21379780543921
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle8360554030
Stalker 269.55547413016
Call of Duty Black Ops 6165158114957041
Until Dawn91.27864483824
God of War Ragnarök1038774685236
Final Fantasy XVI868268613920
Space Marine 2827166584024
Star Wars Outlaws555144362616
Black Myth: Wukong896851282112
The First Descendant191121100875124
F1 24255234182563718
Senua's Saga Hellblade 25139.524.212.8
Ghost of Tsushima78.165.159.251.240.123
Horizon Forbidden West60.959.457.1534125.7
Dragon's Dogma 252.241.123.9
Helldivers 286.782.581.357.431
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown356355355245147.9
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora746758442915
Alan Wake 27971674423.5
Lords of the Fallen948772553619
Total War Pharaoh3172091331108140
Counter-Strike 2215122.794.670.635.7
Cyberpunk 207714211996865221
Baldur's Gate 3145116100976632
Lies of P1791551351167437
Dead Space Remake989581805225
The Witcher 3 v41921631421217737
F1 22250239185.157.4
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands220.5162.3110.290
God of War116.896.376.148.839.934.9
Forza Horizon 52932011821078858
Far Cry 61471191081048446
Anno 180015612997554938
Far Cry New Dawn12510298887751
Shadow of the Tomb Raider212150.7149.1135.190.743
Strange Brigade54625121418711761
Far Cry 5137108105988850
X-Plane 11.11123937159
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark199130926838
Dota 2 Reborn22118716514196
The Witcher 35113541961128458
GTA V184181170947478
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
18
26

6
23
20

11
25
14
3
18
18
5
7
22
16
1
23
20
3
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $2,569.00
    WEELIAO OneXPlayer Super X Gaming Laptop with AMD Ryzen AI Max+395 Processor Radeon 8060S 40 Compute Units|Dual PCIe SSD Slots|14-inch Display| Magnetic Keyboard | Handle(64GB RAM+1TB SSD)
  • $608.95
    HP Victus 15.6" FHD 144Hz Gaming Laptop, AMD Ryzen 5-7535HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M (Beats RTX 2050), Backlit Keyboard, Windows 11 Home, w/Cloth (16GB RAM |512GB PCIe SSD)
  • $3,099.00
    OneXPlayer Super X Gaming Laptop with AMD Ryzen AI Max+395 Processor Radeon 8060S 40 Compute Units,14-inch Display with Protective bag | Magnetic Keyboard | Handle | Soft film (Max+ 395 128G+1TB)
  • $2,649.99
    ASUS ROG Flow Z13 AI Gaming 2-in-1 Laptop 13.4" Touchscreen IPS WQXGA Display (AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64GB LPDDR5X, 1TB SSD, RGB KB, WiFi 7, Webcam, Bluetooth 5.4, Win 11 Home)
  • $304.99
    HP 15 Laptop, FHD Display, AMD Ryzen 3 7320U, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD, AMD Radeon Graphics, Windows 11 Home in S Mode, 15-fc0010nr (2023)

v1.35
log 15. 07:33:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:31:10 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.015s ... 0.017s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.017s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12965 +0.032s ... 0.049s

#10 got single benchmarks 12965 +0.038s ... 0.087s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.087s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +2.14s ... 2.227s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 2.228s

#14 Got 1082 rows for game benchmarks. +0.227s ... 2.455s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.455s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.035s ... 2.49s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.606s ... 3.096s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.319s ... 3.415s

#19 return log +0s ... 3.415s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 8060S graphics card

配备 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 和 128GB 内存的 Acemagic M1A Pro+

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 与 128 GB 内存的立方体:Acemagic M1A Pro+ 是迷你 PC 中新的性能之王?

Acemagic M1A Pro+ 将功能强大的高端硬件与引人注目的机箱相结合:这款迷你 PC 配备了 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395、128 GB 内存和强大的 Radeon 显卡,可为游戏和专业工作负载提供充足的性能。在本测试中,我们将展示该系统在基准测试、游戏和连续负载下的表现,以及它是否是同类产品中最强大的迷你 PC 之一。
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, 1.9 kg
13 英寸可折叠机型中的 AMD Strix Halo 和 128 GB 内存 - 华硕 ProArt PX13 GoPro 版评测

13 英寸可折叠机型中的 AMD Strix Halo 和 128 GB 内存 - 华硕 ProArt PX13 GoPro 版评测

华硕推出了功能强大的 ProArt PX13 可折叠机的 GoPro 特别版。除了一些视觉上的变化,这款小巧的 13 英寸机型还获得了最快的 AMD Strix Halo Ryzen AI Max+ 395,包括 Radeon 8060s GPU 和 128 GB 内存。不过,2.8K OLED 仍被限制在 60 Hz。
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, 13.3", 1.4 kg
迷你论坛 MS-S1 Max

2025 年最强大的迷你 PC 之一!Minisforum MS-S1 Max 评测 - AMD Strix Halo Power、128 GB 内存和 Radeon 8060S,适用于专业人士和人工智能

Minisforum MS-S1 Max 将目前最强大的移动硬件集成在一个小巧的外壳中。这款迷你 PC 配备了 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395、128 GB 内存和 Radeon RX 8060S,为严肃游戏和工作站提供了最佳条件。关键问题是它能否成为 2025 年的顶级迷你 PC 之一?我们在评测中通过大量的测量和基准测试给出了答案。
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, 2.8 kg
Framework Desktop 评测:迷你 ITX 机身包裹的迷你 PC

Framework Desktop 评测:迷你 ITX 机身包裹的迷你 PC

Framework 又一次在 AMD 身上下了大注,其结果是,这款电脑几乎具备了标准 Mini-ITX 系统的所有可修复性优势,而体积却几乎和迷你电脑一样小。
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, 3.1 kg
GMKtec EVO-X2

2025 年最佳迷你 PC 之一 - AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 和 Radeon 8060S 在 GMKtec EVO-X2 中的顶级性能评测

GMKtec EVO-X2 在最小的空间内实现了高端性能:配备 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395、高达 64 GB 的内存和 Radeon RX 8060S,这款迷你 PC 对游戏玩家和创意专业人士都很有吸引力。在测试中,我们将检验这款迷你 PC 在基准测试、当前游戏和最大负载下的表现,以及它是否会成为 2025 年的顶级迷你 PC 之一。
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, 1.6 kg

BOSGAME M5: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 1.3 kg
  Review » 年度最佳迷你 PC?AMD Strix Halo、128 GB 内存和 Radeon RX 8060S 在 Bosgame M5 中的评测

HP Z2 Mini G1a: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, 2.6 kg
  Review » 配备 AMD Strix Halo 的惠普 Z2 Mini G1a 评论--配备 Ryzen AI Max+ 和 Radeon RX 8060S 的紧凑型工作站

HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 评测:功能强大的 MacBook Pro 替代品,工作游戏两不误

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 13.40", 1.6 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 分析 - Strix Halo 将与Apple M4 Pro/Max 竞争,配备 16 个 Zen 5 内核和与 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑相当的 iGPU

  Review » 华硕 ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA 可折叠笔记本电脑评测--AMD 的 Strix Halo GPU 与 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑不相上下

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401EA : AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401EA

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ProArt PX13 HN7306EA

HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 13.40", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W

Acemagic M1A Pro+: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 1.9 kg
   » 配备 128GB 内存和 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 的 Acemagic M1A Pro+ - 作为高内存价格的重要替代品的迷你 PC?

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 13.30", 1.4 kg
   » 评测结果 华硕 ProArt PX13 - 功能强大,几乎无与伦比,专为创意用户设计的敞篷车

   » 新款华硕 ProArt PX13 中的 AMD Strix Halo 并非对所有用户都有改善

   » 为什么新款华硕 ProArt PX13 仍配备老式的 60 Hz 三星 OLED 面板?

   » 华硕 ROG Flow Z13-KJP 上手体验--采用死亡搁浅设计和 AMD Strix Halo 的游戏平板电脑

Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 3.1 kg
   » 仅一周后,Framework 笔记本电脑再次提价

Minisforum MS-S1 Max: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 2.8 kg
   » Minisforum MS-S1 Max 迷你电脑评测:性能模式比较 - 性能、平衡和静音

   » Minisforum MS-S1 Max 迷你电脑评测:性能模式比较 - 性能、平衡和静音

   » Minisforum MS-S1 Max 迷你电脑评测:性能模式比较 - 性能、平衡和静音

Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 3.1 kg
   » Framework Desktop 的运行效率高于采用完全相同的 Ryzen AI Max+ 395 处理器的 GMK EVO-X2

   » AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 为一些速度最快的微型电脑提供动力

BOSGAME M5: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 1.3 kg
   » 配备 AMD Strix Halo 和 128 GB 内存的迷你 PC - AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 和 AMD Radeon 8060S 在 Bosgame M5 中给人留下深刻印象

HP Z2 Mini G1a: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, 2.6 kg
   » 配备高端 APU 的迷你 PC:惠普 Z2 Mini G1a 首款配备 AMD Strix Halo 的工作站评测

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 13.40", 1.6 kg
   » AMD "Strix Halo "泄露基准测试显示 Radeon RX 8050S iGPU 性能仅次于 RTX 4060 桌面 GPU

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P500 *
Vega 10
Vega 9
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter