Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop是在 2025 年 CES 上发布的 Blackwell 系列笔记本电脑移动显卡。它基于 GB205 芯片,拥有 5888 个着色器/CUDA 核心,主频为 847-1995 MHz(取决于型号),12 GB GDDR7 显存,192 位接口。该型号还拥有 46 个 RT 核心和 80 个 ROP。

作为一项新功能,Blackwell 借助第五代张量内核,通过 DLSS4 支持多帧生成 (MFG)。

性能

我们的测试表明,RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑比标准的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑在基准测试中平均快 23%。游戏性能差距较小;在这里,RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑仅比 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑平均快 15%。台式机对应的 RTX 5070 Ti快 34%。此外,利用所提到的多帧生成(MFG),您可以获得令人印象深刻的帧率,但要注意延迟。

功耗

GB205 芯片采用台积电 4N(定制 4NP 5 纳米)工艺制造。该机型允许的最大 TGP 为 140 瓦(包括动态升压)。

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X7
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines5888 - unified
TMUs184
ROPs64
Raytracing Cores46
Tensor / AI Cores184
Core Speed847 - 2220 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU992 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 5.8 MB, L2: 48 MB
Memory Speed32000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth677 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Man. Technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.01.2025

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
19.4 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 4481     avg: 4605     median: 4627 (31%)     max: 4695 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 3420     avg: 3895     median: 3942.5 (27%)     max: 4283 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 15665     avg: 17394     median: 17771 (41%)     max: 18593 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 28297     avg: 31578     median: 33562 (39%)     max: 33585 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
80235 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 29047     avg: 35523     median: 35552 (54%)     max: 42125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 36184     avg: 43241     median: 44034.5 (40%)     max: 47933 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
760743 Points (84%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 13812     avg: 16130     median: 16730 (43%)     max: 17747 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 14615     avg: 16581     median: 17116 (35%)     max: 17981 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -99%
...
11609 -30%
11837 -29%
11850 -29%
12640 -24%
12806 -23%
13241 -20%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
14875 -10%
15184 -8%
16308 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
16581
17764 7%
19434 17%
20920 26%
20950 26%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 40%
23736 43%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 40%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44063 166%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
882191 Points (89%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
659227 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 61167     avg: 70892     median: 71142 (67%)     max: 82832 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 134306     avg: 168184     median: 155373 (38%)     max: 223650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
82266 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
182827 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 37247     avg: 43139     median: 45158 (55%)     max: 47299 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 49092     avg: 55615     median: 55691 (43%)     max: 61651 Points
171.8 -100%
...
41630 -25%
42016 -24%
43219 -22%
44148 -21%
44215 -20%
46877 -16%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
49410 -11%
51979 -7%
54921 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
55615
56791 2%
59943 8%
60040 8%
65041 17%
67212 21%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 23%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 133%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 121273     avg: 122137     median: 122137 (35%)     max: 123001 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 122701     avg: 128541     median: 128540 (70%)     max: 134380 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
85672 -33%
86536 -33%
90128 -30%
96677 -25%
97889 -24%
102426 -20%
102619 -20%
103283 -20%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
117151 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
128541
129977 1%
132443 3%
133963 4%
140541 9%
...
132443 3%
max:
173912 35%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
68580 Points (75%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
52117 -24%
53563 -22%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
53834 -22%
54320 -21%
55811 -19%
61133 -11%
61850 -10%
62666 -9%
64892 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
68580
68868 0%
69623 2%
75005 9%
...
68868 0%
max:
87172 27%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 60964     avg: 65414     median: 65214 (85%)     max: 70064 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
198.1 fps (60%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 24     avg: 26.3     median: 25.7 (4%)     max: 33 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 13     avg: 15.7     median: 16 (6%)     max: 19 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
92.2 fps (23%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
18.5 fps (3%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
190 fps (33%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
98.6 fps (25%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
188 fps (51%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
29 fps (26%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
90.3 fps (36%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
171 fps (27%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
284 fps (43%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
92.9 fps (25%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
14.1 fps (2%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
91.3 fps (16%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
36.2 fps (6%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
202 fps (23%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
22.6 fps (7%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
152 fps (22%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
92.7 fps (10%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
166 fps (26%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
33.6 fps (4%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
50.8 fps (14%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
503 fps (54%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
26 fps (4%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
85.1 fps (29%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
39.1 fps (19%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
76.8 fps (20%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
27.2 fps (3%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
20.4 fps (13%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
331 fps (47%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
37.9 fps (8%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
108 fps (48%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
53.5 fps (35%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
115 fps (39%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
24671 points (18%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
236.6 fps (78%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 164.1     avg: 289.7     median: 316 (18%)     max: 335.41 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
184.7 fps (69%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
403.5 fps (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
960 fps (71%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
859 fps (81%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
983 fps (21%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1084 fps (45%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
3321 fps (26%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 68.3     avg: 678     median: 315 (8%)     max: 1863 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (1%)     max: 6.84 fps
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU OpenCL
min: 67235     avg: 150607     median: 155654 (40%)     max: 178141 points
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU Vulkan
min: 62585     avg: 118034     median: 120562 (30%)     max: 166112 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 7623     avg: 7789     median: 7788.5 (28%)     max: 7954 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 15570     avg: 15671     median: 15671 (27%)     max: 15772 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 40170     avg: 41323     median: 41323 (34%)     max: 42476 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 136.8     avg: 176     median: 184.7 (25%)     max: 203 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
221 Watt (31%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.7 fps per Watt (58%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 152.7     avg: 221.4     median: 231 (64%)     max: 285 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 144.9     avg: 218.9     median: 229 (29%)     max: 278 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4258     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.605 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
50.4 dB(A) (72%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Death Stranding 2

Death Stranding 2

2026
low 1920x1080
118.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
64.7 109.3 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62.8 97.2 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.9 74.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
43.8 56.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
72  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crimson Desert

Crimson Desert

2026
low 1920x1080
123.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
72.9 93.6 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
70.1 89.8 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
66.1 78 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
52.1 60.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
75.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Resident Evil Requiem

Resident Evil Requiem

2026
low 1920x1080
155.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
93.1 124.7 ~ 109 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
90.9 114.8 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
60.1 65.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40.4 42.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Max Settings + Path Tracing + DLSS Balanced 1920x1080
56.7
Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
218 239 257 ~ 238 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
138 188 190 198 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
123 147 151 157 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47 52 58 60 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31 34 38 39 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
53 60 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
142.3 149.4 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99 107.2 107.4 118.8 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74.6 78.3 84.4 93.3 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.7 42.3 47.4 49 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.3 30.3 34.2 34.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.3  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
30.5  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
48.7 49.9 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
215  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
142.3 155.7 187.4 ~ 162 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
114.5 129.2 144.4 ~ 129 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
79.8 89.5 98.6 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58 64 68.3 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
96.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
105.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
79.6 100.5 103.2 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
69.8 82.3 94.5 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.9 53.9 58.4 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.4 36.1 37.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
160.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
149.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
129.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
97.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
68.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
89  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
92.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
54.7 63.3 77.8 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.8 55.4 64.4 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.1 34.5 44.5 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.4 23.9 31.4 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
127.9 181.7 188.4 242 249 260 ~ 208 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
123.2 181.2 184.5 217 231 243 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117 168.3 170.8 171.9 218 225 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.3 35 35.3 37.6 42.1 42.9 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18 20 21.3 22.6 25 26 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8.9  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
20.4  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
32 36.9 39.3 41.1 45.9 48.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
69.7
64.7
61
85.3
87.3
69.9
low 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77.5 94.8 94.9 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.3 84.3 86.1 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
65 82.7 85.4 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
45.7 57.9 59.1 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61 79.1 82.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
86.9 94 112.6 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
78.2 81.8 90.8 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40 42.9 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28 30.1 30.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
41.9 44.7 47.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
81 85 90 93 94 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76 77 84 84 89 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63 66 70 72 77 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47 52 52 53 55 55 58 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40 41 42 44 45 47 48 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
41 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49 51 58 59 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
78
70
84
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
56
low 1920x1080
443  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
192.1 212 261 ~ 222 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
187.5 202 213 ~ 201 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
129.1 141.9 144 ~ 138 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
93.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.8 84 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56 67.2 70.8 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.8 54.7 55 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
66.6 70.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
189.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
145.2 152.4 153.5 ~ 150 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
118.8 125.2 126.7 ~ 124 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
84.1 88.2 90 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59 62.7 65 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
79.2 86.1 94.7 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
126.7 144.4 158.1 ~ 143 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
93.5 102.4 118.6 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
82.2 89.9 101 105.1 107.4 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
63.5 68.4 77.6 80.8 82.5 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
31.7 43.1 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
91.1 96 99.9 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
20.2
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
84.6 89.8 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.6 76.6 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
62 65.5 ~ 64 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
46.9 49.9 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
100.8 104.6 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
138 152 159 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
135 142 150 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100 100 121 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94 94 97 112 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
65 68 68 89 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
58  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
85.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
48  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
90.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
73.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
84.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
86.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
70.7 82.3 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
66.5 72.2 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
55.9 60.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
40.3 43.5 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
56.8 59.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG RR 2560x1440 cinem.
64.9
low 1280x720 cinem.
84.7
low 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
192
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
59
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
247 322 ~ 285 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
226 236 315 350 ~ 282 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
217 223 232 250 270 291 ~ 247 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.2 93 98.7 106.4 107.6 108 110.6 114.8 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.2 60.4 66.4 68.5 69.4 71.2 72 72.1 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.1 35.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
38.6 61.4 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
78.1 88.5 94.1 98.4 106 112.4 115.8 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
113.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
77.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
106.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
83.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
83.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
131.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
97.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
72.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
93.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
74.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
143.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
141.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
141.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
101.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
183
low 1920x1080
93.2 93.2 108.9 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.2 88.3 103.5 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.5 81.7 95.8 96 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54.5 54.6 63.9 64.5 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
13.1
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
22.9
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
39.8
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
72.4
low 1920x1080
521.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
317.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
200.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
161.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
127.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
641.8
med. 1920x1080
316  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
265  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
222  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
174.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
130.4 131.6 149.4 150.4 161.7 175.1 183.7 188.6 203 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
126.8 127.3 127.4 134.4 135.9 138.5 139.8 156.8 164.6 166.9 169.2 178.7 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112 114.7 115.9 117 119.7 126.4 133.9 135.4 138 140.6 143.2 144.6 154.1 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100.8 104.9 105.1 105.4 107.6 115.7 119.6 124.1 126.7 128 129 129.9 132.4 135.5 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68.4 71.7 72.7 75 80.8 81 81.6 82.6 82.9 84.3 87.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.9 37.1 37.3 128.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
127.2  fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
33.6  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
81.5 83.6 84.8 91.2 91.6 93.9 94.2 96.1 102.1 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
206
157
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
60.7
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset + DLSS3 Quality + FG 3840x2160
57.4
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
157.7
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
17.7
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
104.9
122.6
104.9
99.1
110.5
120.5
116.2
113.2
103.9
68
116.2
95.6
101.6
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
3.7
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
19.4
19.9
18.9
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
34
35.8
31
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
61.8
66.8
54
low 1920x1080
156 167.7 175.8 175.9 176.3 202.6 221 ~ 182 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
129.1 131.1 144 146.1 147.9 150.1 154.7 172.8 178.7 179.1 188 ~ 157 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
108.1 111.1 128.3 129.8 130 131.7 137.6 151.9 154.2 157.5 161 ~ 136 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
108.3 122.8 125.2 127 131.2 131.7 138.9 147.4 153.9 155.6 156 157 158.6 246.1 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
91 91.4 93.9 97.6 99.1 103 108.6 109.2 110.5 112.4 175.5 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
46.6 52.5 59.2 91.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
72.4 86.4 94.6 102.5 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
128.4 130 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
245
233
173
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
170.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
150.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
136  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
135.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
116.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
164.6
Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR TAA 1920x1080
102.4
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
182.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
164.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
133.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
86.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
76.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
392 403 422 438 483 579 585 643 ~ 493 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
201 328 335 338 348 362 464 468 479 ~ 369 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
156.5 294 301 305 308 328 381 387 403 ~ 318 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
136.4 266 274 276 279 303 337 340 347 353 ~ 291 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
103.8 198.9 201 209 228 229 236 246 250 ~ 211 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
113.5 131.7 138.1 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
174  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
155  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
144  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
170
low 1280x720
107.9 121.8 132.7 138.7 144.1 155.1 155.8 155.8 156.9 165 173.7 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.9 99.8 110.2 113.8 114.7 123.7 123.9 135.3 136.4 140.1 142.2 144.1 145.4 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.3 80.7 90.6 92.5 101.6 105.6 106.6 109.4 115.5 116 117.5 118.3 124.6 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
75.5 91.8 108.2 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
117.4 195.7 213 217 223 231 232 234 ~ 208 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115.6 123.2 164.7 180.2 183.4 197.6 208 211 216 221 230 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108.9 111.3 135.8 144.3 147.8 156.8 158.2 163.1 166 167.2 173.1 180.1 181.4 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
103.9 107.6 109 119.7 121.8 125.2 126.2 127 129.5 132.4 134.2 139.2 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74.1 77.5 78.8 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
160.8 166.9 170.3 209 213 223 223 228 256 259 263 ~ 216 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
130.8 137.5 153.7 155.7 183.9 186 192.9 198.2 199.7 199.9 217 222 240 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
122.3 133.1 145.7 152.7 175.8 178.8 185.5 189.3 189.7 192.5 209 213 215 ~ 177 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115.5 123.6 134.2 141.1 164.7 165.4 171.4 174 174.8 176.4 188.4 193 193.9 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
120.1 170.7 173.1 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
686  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
517  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
341  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
154 176.2 ~ 165 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
130  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
394
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
152 185.8 187.6 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
162.5 167.8 185.4 185.6 186 186.6 187.6 ~ 180 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
147.3 153.8 164.5 179 180.2 181 182.8 184.7 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98 102.7 124.7 144.8 147 147.6 149 152.9 161 161 164.6 166.3 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
98.9 117.3 123.8 138.8 139.1 143 147.3 147.3 151.4 157.3 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
124.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
83.3
62.5
71
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
184.1
187.2
157.5
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
186.3
187.9
171.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Death Stranding 2118.987806250
Crimson Desert123.683807256
Resident Evil Requiem155.81091036341
Call of Duty Black Ops 72381791455436
Anno 117: Pax Romana14610883453219.3
ARC Raiders2151621298963
The Outer Worlds 2105.694825436
Battlefield 6160.7149.2129.497.168.1
Borderlands 492.965573726
F1 2520819717938228.92
Doom: The Dark Ages9389797854
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered11698844230
Assassin's Creed Shadows898270534432
Civilization 7443222201138
Monster Hunter Wilds93.17463.2655333.4
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2189.31501248762
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle143105977537
Stalker 287756448
Call of Duty Black Ops 6150142107997337
Until Dawn99.385.967.748
Space Marine 290.988.887.773.1
Star Wars Outlaws86.877695842
Black Myth: Wukong133100784433
F1 242852822471036732
Senua's Saga Hellblade 277.25540
Ghost of Tsushima106.510283.860.7
Horizon Forbidden West131.197.59672.6
Dragon's Dogma 28374.8
Helldivers 2143.8141.7141.4101.6
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown358358357356
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora126114987447
Alan Wake 29893885933.6
Total War Pharaoh521.4317.1200.2161.4127.4
Counter-Strike 2316265222174.1
Cyberpunk 20771641471301197960
Baldur's Gate 318215713614710862
Far Cry 6170.9150.2136135.7116.7
Anno 1800182.4164.8133.586.476.6
Strange Brigade493369318291211128
Far Cry 5174155145142144
X-Plane 11.1114612510492
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark20818615312377
Dota 2 Reborn216186177163155
The Witcher 3686517341165130
GTA V175180172143136124.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


9
26


19
24

2
22
21

9
19
11
2
17
15
9
2
6
4
3

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $1,699.99
    acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI Gaming Laptop | Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | 16" WQXGA 240Hz G-SYNC | 16GB DDR5 | 1TB Gen 4 SSD | Killer Wi-Fi 6E | PHN16-73-92B8
  • $1,399.99
    Thunderobot Radiant 16 i9 5070Ti 2.5K 300Hz Gaming Laptop, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, Core i9-13900HX, 16" QHD+ 300Hz Display, 16GB DDR5, 1TB SSD, RGB Backlit KB, Wi-Fi 6, Win 11 Home, Black
  • $1,976.46
    acer Nitro 16S AI Copilot+ PC Gaming Laptop | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Processor | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU | 16" WQXGA IPS 180Hz Display | 32GB DDR5 | 2TB Gen 4 SSD | Wi-Fi 6E | AN16S-61-R5K4
  • $1,849.99
    GIGABYTE - A16 PRO Gaming Laptop - 165Hz 2560x1600 WQXGA - Manufactured by NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - Intel Core Ultra 7 240H - 1TB SSD with 32GB LPDDR5X RAM - Windows 11 Home (DXHG4USCC4SH)
  • $2,098.81
    Lenovo Legion Pro 7i – Gaming Laptop - Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 275HX – 16" 2.5K WQXGA OLED Display – 240Hz Refresh Rate – GeForce RTX™ 5070 Ti GPU – 32 GB Memory – 1 TB Storage – 3-Month PC GamePass

v1.35
log 26. 18:04:01

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Apr 2026 05:27:59 +0200 +0.004s ... 0.004s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.014s ... 0.018s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.019s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12926 +0.036s ... 0.055s

#13 got single benchmarks 12926 +0.048s ... 0.103s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.103s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +3.569s ... 3.672s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 3.672s

#17 Got 825 rows for game benchmarks. +0.298s ... 3.97s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 3.97s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.031s ... 4.002s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.889s ... 4.89s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.437s ... 5.328s

#22 return log +0s ... 5.328s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop graphics card

游戏不妥协?配备大显示屏的技嘉游戏本 A18 Pro 评测

游戏不妥协?配备大显示屏的技嘉游戏本 A18 Pro 评测

尽管设计相对纤薄,技嘉 Gaming A18 Pro 仍是市场上最大的游戏笔记本电脑之一。我们测试了配备酷睿 7 240H 和GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 的配置,看看它在竞争中的表现如何。技嘉的竞争者能否保持自己的优势?
Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 18", 2.9 kg
桌上的技嘉游戏机 A16 Pro

技嘉 Gaming A16 Pro 评论:RTX 5070 Ti 与超薄机箱和一些不寻常的优先事项相遇

A16 Pro 配备了酷睿 7 240H、RTX 5070 Ti 和明亮的 165 Hz 显示屏,从纸面上看就是一款典型的中高端游戏笔记本电脑。不过,尽管贴着游戏的标签,这款 23 毫米薄的笔记本似乎瞄准了不同的受众。
Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16", 2.4 kg
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX、RTX 5070 Ti 和迷你 LED - XMG Apex 16 Max 游戏笔记本电脑评测

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX、RTX 5070 Ti 和迷你 LED - XMG Apex 16 Max 游戏笔记本电脑评测

XMG 推出的 Apex 16 Max 是一款游戏笔记本电脑,配备了GeForce RTX 5070 Ti、高速 AMD Fire Range HX 处理器和 300 Hz Mini-LED 面板。虽然游戏性能出色,但遗憾的是电池续航时间非常有限。
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16", 2.7 kg
流星还是失败?宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 16S AI 游戏笔记本评测

流星还是失败?宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 16S AI 游戏笔记本评测

通过 Predator Helios Neo 16S AI,宏碁正在销售一款相当轻薄的游戏笔记本,配备 OLED 显示屏、酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和GeForce RTX 5070 Ti。在我们的评测中,您将发现这款 16 英寸机型是超越了竞争对手,还是更有可能被咬掉牙齿。
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16", 2.2 kg
最便宜的 Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑 GPU - XMG Focus 17 M25 游戏笔记本电脑评测

最便宜的 Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑 GPU - XMG Focus 17 M25 游戏笔记本电脑评测

新款 XMG Focus 17 M25 是获得新款 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本 GPU 的最经济实惠的方式。这款 17 英寸游戏笔记本电脑现已上市,起价为 1,849 欧元(当前汇率约合人民币 2,100 元),但您需要为这个价格做出哪些妥协呢?
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 17.3", 2.8 kg

Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » 配备 Ryzen 9 9955HX 和 RTX 5070 Ti GPU 的游戏笔记本 - Chuwi Gamebook 评测

Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » 超速运行的 RTX 5070 Ti:Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 游戏笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » 迄今最强大的 RTX 5070 Ti 玩家 - 联想Legion Pro 5 16IAX10H OLED 评测

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » 微星 Vector 16 HX AI 评测:搭载 RTX 5070 Ti、功能丰富的游戏笔记本电脑

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 纤薄游戏玩家的 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑给人留下深刻印象--华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑几乎与 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑一样快 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 评测

MSI Vector A18 HX A9W: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  Review » 微星 Vector A18 HX A9W 笔记本电脑评测: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 才是王道

Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑和高达 128 GB 内存的游戏/工作站混合型笔记本电脑 - XMG Pro 16 (E25) 笔记本电脑评测

Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25) Engineering Sample: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  Review » 仅有 12 GB VRAM 的高端产品? - NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑评测

Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR, Core 7 255HX: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR, Core 7 255HX

MSI Vector A16 HX A8W: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector A16 HX A8W

Razer Blade 16 2025, RTX 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 2025, RTX 5070 Ti

HP Omen Max 16-ah0000: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16-ah0000

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » 宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73

Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LR: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LR

Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5070 Ti

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti

Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CR: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CR

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG, Ultra 9 275HX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG, Ultra 9 275HX

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614FR: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G614FR

MSI Stealth A18 AI+ A3XWHG: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A18 AI+ A3XWHG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403WR: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403WR

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG

Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » 宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72

Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti): Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » RTX 5070 出来了,RTX 5070 Ti 进来了--技嘉 A16 突然变成了 A16 Pro

   » 纤薄、高效、持久、实惠--技嘉 A16 Pro 惊喜回顾

   » 这款 "专业 "笔记本有问题:技嘉 A16 Pro 的现实检验

Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
   » XMG Apex 16 Max 与 XMG Pro 16 - RTX 5070 Ti 用 AMD 还是 Intel 更好?

   » 配备GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 的 XMG Apex 16 Max 完全专注于游戏性能

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » 少花钱多办事:在联想Legion Pro 中,使用 Ultra 7 而不是 Ultra 9 究竟会损失多少性能?

Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
   » 配备 RTX 5070 Ti 的 XMG Focus 17 M25 是目前最超值的游戏笔记本电脑

Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » 楚维进军游戏领域--配备 AMD Ryzen 9 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本图形处理器的强大笔记本电脑评测

MSI Vector A18 HX A9W: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
   » 这些是目前配备GeForce RTX 5070 显卡的最慢和最快的笔记本电脑

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » 联想Legion Pro 5i 16 与Legion Pro 7i 16:我们对两者进行了评测

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 评论:功能强大,但速度仍慢于较小的 G14 同类产品

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 评论:功能强大,但速度仍慢于较小的 G14 同类产品

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 是无与伦比的,因为 Razer Blade 14 只能使用 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑

Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » 用 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的钱购买 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑的性能 - 在我们的评测中,配备全新 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑的 XMG Pro 16 显示出强劲性能

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P500 *
Vega 10
Vega 9
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)