Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

英特尔 UHD 图形 32 EU(Jasper Lake,第 11 代)是 Jasper Lake Pentium SoC 的集成显卡,适用于笔记本电脑和小型台式机。 这是 Jasper Lake 系列 (Pentium Silver) 中速度最快的 GPU 版本,提供所有 32 个 EU(执行单元 / 着色器块)。 没有专用图形内存,时钟速率因处理器型号而异。 上市时,Pentium Silver型号(6W N6000和10W N6005)为350~900MHz。

随着体系结构的改进和欧盟数量的增加,UHD显卡明显比旧的Gemini Lake SoC(例如N5000)更快。 英特尔表示,火箭联赛的3D Mark Fire Strike分数最高提高78%,FPS最高提高22%。 即使这样,也只能玩要求非常低的游戏。

Gen11显卡的新特点是新的Variable Rate Shading(VRS;可变速率阴影)支持。 使用此功能,您可以以较低的分辨率(最多 4x4 块使用一个源)确定阴影时间和阴影对象(例如,背景或雾后)。 使用此技术的早期结果,Unreal Engine POC 性能最高可达 1.3 倍,Civ 6 速度最高可达 1.2 倍。到目前为止,VRS仅支持新的 Nvidia Turing 体系结构(GTX 1650 或更高版本)。

另一个改进的硬件是内置视频解码器和编码器,英特尔大幅改进。 虽然未指定详细内容,但上一代使用专用硬件,以 10 位颜色深度解码主 10 配置文件的 VP9 和 H.265/HEVC。

Jasper Lake SoCs 和集成 GPU 在 Intel 的 10nm 工艺(如 Ice Lake)中制造,与 TSMC 的 7nm 工艺相当。

Gen. 11 Series

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameGen. 11
ArchitectureGen. 11
Pipelines32 - unified
Core Speed350 - 900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption4.8 - 10 Watt
technology10 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement11.01.2021
CPU in UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium Silver N60054 x 2000 MHz, 10 W450 MHz900 MHz
Intel Pentium Silver N60004 x 1100 MHz, 6 W350 MHz850 MHz
min. - max.350 - 450 MHz850 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.5 pt (1%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -86%
...
AMD Radeon R5 M330
0.42 -9%
0.4255 -8%
Intel HD Graphics 530
0.4259 -8%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
0.4323 -7%
0.4332 -6%
Intel HD Graphics 5600
0.4514 -2%
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
0.456 -1%
0.4574 -1%
0.4615 0%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
0.4628
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
0.4656 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
0.4662 1%
0.4765 3%
0.4833 4%
AMD Radeon R7 M260
0.4861 5%
Intel HD Graphics 630
0.4861 5%
0.4922 6%
AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
0.508 10%
AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
0.518 12%
...
21.1 4459%
max:
33.3 7095%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 274     avg: 371.2     median: 372 (1%)     max: 456 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 242     avg: 328.8     median: 330 (1%)     max: 402 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -66%
...
Intel UHD Graphics 615
244.7 -26%
254.5 -23%
255 -22%
Intel HD Graphics 520
263 -20%
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
274 -17%
281 -15%
Intel UHD Graphics 617
299 -9%
312 -5%
320 -3%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
328.8
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
329 0%
334 2%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
336.2 2%
343.7 5%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
344.7 5%
349 6%
Intel HD Graphics 630
368 12%
371.8 13%
377 15%
...
19434 5811%
max:
36485 10996%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 62122     avg: 71176     median: 72158 (8%)     max: 78266 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 20602     avg: 28831     median: 30464 (4%)     max: 33792 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 4709     avg: 5737     median: 5531.5 (6%)     max: 7589 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 5681     avg: 7297     median: 6977 (2%)     max: 9405 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 650     avg: 998     median: 982 (2%)     max: 1260 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 712     avg: 1056     median: 1016 (1%)     max: 1360 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 21465     avg: 39252     median: 40638.5 (5%)     max: 54265 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2289     avg: 2505     median: 2504.5 (1%)     max: 2720 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
681 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 3217     avg: 3440     median: 3439.5 (3%)     max: 3662 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 4254     avg: 4588     median: 4588 (2%)     max: 4922 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1448     avg: 1756     median: 1652 (2%)     max: 2086 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1356     avg: 1625     median: 1589 (1%)     max: 1872 Points
171.8 -89%
...
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
1569 -3%
1577 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
1583 -3%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
1588 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
1597 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
1600 -2%
1600 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
1602 -1%
1621 0%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
1625
1628 0%
AMD Radeon R5 M320
1652 2%
1656 2%
1671 3%
1674 3%
AMD Radeon R5 M330
1684 4%
1689 4%
Intel HD Graphics 630
1696 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
1703 5%
...
59943 3589%
max:
106023 6424%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 5185     avg: 6317     median: 6316.5 (2%)     max: 7448 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 4446     avg: 5452     median: 5451.5 (3%)     max: 6457 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
5243 -4%
5243 -4%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
5324 -2%
5366 -2%
5369 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
5372 -1%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
5382 -1%
5410 -1%
5411 -1%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
5452
5560 2%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
5573 2%
5594 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
5595 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
5631 3%
5698 5%
5717 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
5735 5%
5833 7%
...
132443 2329%
max:
170928 3035%
0%
100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 8291     avg: 11395     median: 11395 (12%)     max: 14499 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
10689 -6%
AMD Radeon R5 M335
10717 -6%
10786 -5%
10949 -4%
11125 -2%
11140 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
11161 -2%
11294 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
11355 0%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
11395
11469 1%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
11550 1%
Intel HD Graphics 520
11565 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
11672 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
11777 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
11811 4%
11853 4%
11878 4%
Intel UHD Graphics 610
12054 6%
...
61850 443%
max:
87172 665%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5416     avg: 7321     median: 6074 (8%)     max: 10473 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 3.5     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (1%)     max: 5.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
12.6 fps (4%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
13.7 fps (6%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
15.4 fps (3%)
0.6 -96%
...
AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
14.7 -5%
14.8 -4%
14.9 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
15.1 -2%
15.23 -1%
AMD Radeon R5 M335
15.3 -1%
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
15.3 -1%
15.3 -1%
15.4 0%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
15.4
15.5 1%
15.5 1%
AMD FirePro M4100
15.6 1%
15.9 3%
16.2 5%
16.4 6%
16.5 7%
16.5 7%
16.6 8%
...
532 3355%
0%
100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6115     avg: 6526     median: 6561 (5%)     max: 6868 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 18.59     avg: 20.5     median: 19.8 (7%)     max: 23.82 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 25.4     avg: 31.3     median: 31.6 (2%)     max: 37.14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.5 (2%)     max: 11.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 24.4     avg: 26.5     median: 26.5 (2%)     max: 28.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 25.1     median: 25.1 (3%)     max: 26.1 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 31.7     avg: 34     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36.2 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 48.7     avg: 53.7     median: 53.7 (3%)     max: 58.7 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 85.6     avg: 91.2     median: 91.2 (1%)     max: 96.8 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 136     avg: 163.8     median: 160 (1%)     max: 199 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 274     avg: 364.5     median: 387 (1%)     max: 410 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 771     avg: 983     median: 1012.5 (1%)     max: 1136 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.2     avg: 16.9     median: 16.5 (2%)     max: 25 Watt
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.2     avg: 14.5     median: 13.9 (2%)     max: 16.3 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 14.3     avg: 15.4     median: 15.4 (3%)     max: 16.5 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (15%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
14.5
low 1280x720
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
7.6
low 1280x720
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
New World

New World

2021
low 1280x720
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
37.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
13.5
low 1280x720
4.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
6.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
15.3 30.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4.1 19.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
12
low 1280x720
5.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
15.6 16.3 18.7 20.3 32 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.2 9.7 12.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7 10.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
8
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
91.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
14.2 15.2 16.1 17.3 20 21 23.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 10.2 10.2 11.4 12.4 14.5 15.9 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9 9 9.1 10.5 12.5 13.2 14.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.3 5.4 9 10.7 12.4 14.3 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
1.9 3 4.5 5 5.8 6.7 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0.8 2 4.6 ~ 2 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.2 48.1 50.1 53.1 54 67.9 79.8 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.4 21.5 22.4 22.4 23.5 26.9 27.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9 10.8 11.1 12.8 14.9 15.8 19.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3 8.4 10.4 11.5 13.8 14.4 18.3 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
8.4 11.3 20.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
7.8 9.2 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
3.5 4.8 ~ 4 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
2.4 2.7 ~ 3 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
6.6 11.4 15.2 17.4 26 26.8 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.5 12 13.3 26.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.4 3.5 10.8 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
8.9
8.5
5.8
23.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
9.5
13.6
5.2
23.6
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
71.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
106  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
45.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
44.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands5.436.634.25
Farming Simulator 2220.5
Back 4 Blood12.8
Alan Wake Remastered10.6
New World17
F1 202137.615.812.7
Monster Hunter Stories 218.8
Mass Effect Legendary Edition4.39
Serious Sam 46.75
F1 20202314.710.56.41
Borderlands 3127.964.68
Apex Legends5.2
Strange Brigade2110913.3
Far Cry 53111
World of Tanks enCore91.213.3
X-Plane 11.11181111
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1042
Dota 2 Reborn55231312
The Witcher 313943
GTA V17156
Sims 471.218.3
BioShock Infinite3520.615.5
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm10615.3
Tomb Raider45.425.516.1
Diablo III44.632.621.414.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
17
5
3
16
1

14


6








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 23. 04:11:55

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.041s ... 0.042s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.043s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.043s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#14 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.043s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 10640 +0.027s ... 0.07s

#16 got single benchmarks 10640 +0.029s ... 0.099s

#17 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.881s ... 0.98s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.98s

#20 Got 171 rows for game benchmarks. +0.032s ... 1.011s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.011s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.02s ... 1.032s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +0.746s ... 1.778s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.78s

#25 return log +0s ... 1.78s

Notebook reviews with Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) graphics card

英特尔NUC11基本套件 - Atlas Canyon

英特尔NUC11基本套件别名Atlas Canyon,配备英特尔奔腾银N6005和英特尔赛扬N4505评测

英特尔的NUC11基本套件基于英特尔Jasper Lake SoC,非常适合办公室工作。我们仔细观察了这款迷你PC,它采用了英特尔奔腾银N6005和英特尔赛扬N4505。在这篇评论中,你可以了解到这两个系统的特点。...
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | | 530 g
英特尔NUC11基本套件 - Atlas Canyon

英特尔NUC11基本套件别名Atlas Canyon,配备英特尔奔腾银N6005和英特尔赛扬N4505评测

英特尔的NUC11基本套件基于英特尔Jasper Lake SoC,非常适合办公室工作。我们仔细观察了这款迷你PC,它采用了英特尔奔腾银N6005和英特尔赛扬N4505。在这篇评论中,你可以了解到这两个系统的特点。...
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | | 530 g
联想V14二代英特尔评测

联想V14第二代笔记本电脑评测。被动式冷却、经济实惠、可升级

联想V14 G2的价格仅为329美元(256GB),配备了被动冷却装置,并提供了良好的键盘和各种扩展选项。凭借其英特尔奔腾银N6000四核处理器,它足以应付办公任务。然而,使用外部显示器可能是一个优先事项。...
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
Newsmay AC8

Newsmay AC8迷你电脑回顾。采用奔腾N6005的静音办公电脑

我们仔细观察了基于Jasper Lake的Newsmay AC8,以便揭示你可以从这个紧凑的无风扇迷你PC中期待什么。作为一款小型办公电脑,Newsmay AC8的身材很好,我们可以提前告诉你这一点。...
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | | 534 g
宏碁Swift 1 SF114-34评论。安静、持久的14英寸笔记本电脑

宏碁Swift 1 SF114-34评论。安静、持久的14英寸笔记本电脑

宏碁的14英寸笔记本电脑由于其出色的电池寿命、静音操作、键盘背光和哑光IPS屏幕而获得一些重要的分数。四核奔腾银N6000的性能与Skylate芯片的性能差不多。不包括Windows。整个包的价格为279欧元(约315美元)。...
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | 14.00" | 1.3 kg

Asus Vivobook 13 Slate: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » 华硕Vivobook 13 Slate平板电脑的回顾。OLED的最佳表现

Acer Chromebook Spin 314 CP314-1H: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Spin 314 CP314-1H

Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1

Acer Chromebook 315 CB315-4HT: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 315 CB315-4HT

Nokia PureBook Fold 14: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.10", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Nokia PureBook Fold 14

Lenovo IdeaPad 1 15, Pentium Silver N6000: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 1 15, Pentium Silver N6000

HP Tablet 11-be0097nr: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 11.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » HP Tablet 11-be0097nr

Acer Aspire 1 A114-33-P2EY: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 1 A114-33-P2EY

Asus BR1100CKA-GJ0100RA: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus BR1100CKA-GJ0100RA

HP Chromebook 14a-na1005ns: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook 14a-na1005ns

Asus Vivobook 13 Slate: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 13 Slate

Acer Aspire 3 A315-35-P9GR: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-35-P9GR

Acer Chromebook 317 CB317-1HT-P5PF: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 17.30", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 317 CB317-1HT-P5PF

Asus BR1100FKA-BP0491RA: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus BR1100FKA-BP0491RA

Acer Aspire 3 A317-33-P1QX: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A317-33-P1QX

Acer Swift 1 SF114-34 P2VU: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF114-34 P2VU

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-08-13)