Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Intel Arc 8-Cores

配备 8 个内核的 Intel Arc iGPU(ID 7D55)是Meteor Lake SoC 中的一款集成显卡,基于 Xe LPG 架构(与专用 Arc GPU 相似,但更注重效率)。它提供全部 8 个 Xe 内核(128 个 Xe 向量引擎)、8 个光线追踪单元、8 个采样器和 4 个像素后端。

只有在双通道模式下使用至少 16GB 内存时,才能使用 Arc 名称。否则,唯一的 iGPU 被称为"Intel Graphics",而且速度也明显较慢。

据英特尔公司称,与上一代产品相比,性能提高了一倍(可能还在 Alder Lake 阶段)。

iGPU 支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate(可能与桌面 Arc GPU 一样支持 DX 12_2)。图形处理器还支持 XeSS AI 超级采样。

Meteor Lake 的媒体引擎位于 SOC 芯片中,支持高达 8k60 10 位 HDR 的 MPEG2、AVC、VP9、HEVC 和 AV1 编码和解码。显示引擎也在 SoC 芯片中,支持 HDMI 2.1 和 DisplayPort 2.1 20G,最高支持 8K60 HDR。

Meteor Lake 芯片的 GPU 芯片在台积电以 5 纳米(5N 工艺)制造。

Arc LPG Series

Arc 8-Cores 8 @ 2.3 GHz
Arc 7-Cores 7 @ 2.2 GHz
Graphics 4-Core 4 @ 1.95 GHz
CodenameMeteor Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe LPG
Pipelines8 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed2300 (Boost) MHz
CacheL1: 1.5 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3
technology5 nm
DisplaysHDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.0 20G
Date of Announcement14.12.2023
CPU in Arc 8-CoresGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H16 x 3800 MHz, 45 W? MHz2350 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H16 x 3800 MHz, 28 W? MHz2300 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H16 x 3800 MHz, 28 W? MHz2250 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H14 x 3600 MHz, 28 W? MHz2200 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2200 - 2350 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.9 pt (12%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -98%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.34 -14%
3.4 -13%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.52 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.53 -9%
3.54 -9%
3.59 -8%
3.61 -7%
3.85 -1%
3.86 -1%
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
3.9
3.98 2%
4.05 4%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.2 8%
4.22 8%
4.24 9%
4.41 13%
4.52 16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
4.6 18%
4.65 19%
...
21.1 441%
max:
33.3 754%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2178     avg: 3423     median: 3504 (10%)     max: 4151 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2018     avg: 3132     median: 3205.5 (8%)     max: 3756 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
2805 -10%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 -10%
2864 -9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 -7%
2993 -4%
2998 -4%
3074 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -1%
3123 0%
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
3132
3139 0%
3160 1%
3269 4%
3324 6%
3364 7%
3430 10%
3492 11%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 12%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 14%
...
19434 520%
max:
36485 1065%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
159748 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18794     avg: 30031     median: 30231.5 (32%)     max: 37020 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 35698     avg: 43071     median: 43977.5 (12%)     max: 51286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5203     avg: 7509     median: 7874 (14%)     max: 9001 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5568     avg: 8228     median: 8561 (10%)     max: 9650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 160401     avg: 189213     median: 190580 (23%)     max: 215292 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4294     avg: 5866     median: 5869 (7%)     max: 6558 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 25821     avg: 30856     median: 32273 (12%)     max: 33783 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7756     avg: 11766     median: 12151 (17%)     max: 13904 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8064     avg: 11823     median: 12230 (11%)     max: 13716 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 38877     avg: 41031     median: 41031 (12%)     max: 43185 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 33524     avg: 36354     median: 36354 (21%)     max: 39184 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
33740 -7%
33810 -7%
34450 -5%
34680 -5%
34951 -4%
35209 -3%
35286 -3%
35807 -2%
36214 0%
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
36354
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36391 0%
36405 0%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 1%
37644 4%
38910 7%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
39191 8%
39213 8%
40134 10%
40643 12%
...
132443 264%
max:
170928 370%
0%
100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
42967 Points (47%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
32434 -25%
33386 -22%
35504 -17%
35662 -17%
36878 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
37669 -12%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
38073 -11%
38999 -9%
39066 -9%
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
42967
43138 0%
AMD Radeon 680M
43450 1%
AMD Radeon 660M
43616 2%
46269 8%
48758 13%
50571 18%
50971 19%
52117 21%
53254 24%
...
61850 44%
max:
87172 103%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
36831 Points (48%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
17.1 fps (6%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
42.7 fps (11%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
3.3 fps (0%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
18.2 fps (4%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
16.9 fps (4%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
54.9 fps (15%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.9 fps (1%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
23.1 fps (9%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
48.2 fps (8%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
49.8 fps (9%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
44.8 fps (12%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
5.9 fps (1%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
18.2 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
29.7 fps (6%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
59.5 fps (7%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
5.7 fps (2%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
29.6 fps (4%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
71.6 fps (8%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
46.4 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
11 fps (3%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
5.1 fps (5%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
35.4 fps (6%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
4.6 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
17.9 fps (8%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
10 fps (7%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
12.9 fps (5%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 101.92     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (36%)     max: 108.87 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 135.3     avg: 151.8     median: 151.8 (9%)     max: 176.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 36.6     avg: 38.6     median: 38.6 (16%)     max: 40.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
83.4 fps (15%)
3.3 -96%
...
62.7 -25%
62.8 -25%
63.8 -24%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 -22%
65.5 -21%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 -13%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 -11%
78.8 -6%
80.5 -3%
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
83.4
87.1 4%
89.3 7%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 9%
93.2 12%
94.7 14%
96.8 16%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
100.4 20%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
102.9 23%
108 29%
...
536 543%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 210     avg: 221.6     median: 221.6 (16%)     max: 233.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
167.1 fps (19%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
817 fps (7%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 227.7     median: 269 (2%)     max: 345 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 17911     avg: 31972     median: 34126 (10%)     max: 36188 points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 20875     avg: 30843     median: 32858 (11%)     max: 34520 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 549     avg: 632     median: 631.5 (3%)     max: 714 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2319     avg: 2465     median: 2465 (4%)     max: 2611 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 7480     avg: 7554     median: 7553.5 (8%)     max: 7627 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 35     avg: 47.6     median: 49.2 (7%)     max: 60.6 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27     avg: 42.6     median: 44.4 (6%)     max: 55.8 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 29.7     avg: 46.8     median: 46.6 (10%)     max: 60.9 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3826     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (49%)     max: 0.553 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4516     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (44%)     max: 0.615 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 27     avg: 37.7     median: 37.8 (60%)     max: 46.3 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dragon's Dogma 2

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
22.5
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Alone in the Dark

Alone in the Dark

2024
low 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Last Epoch

Last Epoch

2024
low 1920x1080
45.8 73.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.1 52.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.9 46.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.6 40.3 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
59.3
Skull & Bones

Skull & Bones

2024
low 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Enshrouded

Enshrouded

2024
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
40.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
183.9 208 ~ 196 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
128.6 142.8 ~ 136 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120.9 134.2 ~ 128 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
99.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
82.7 116 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.5 74.8 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.6 53.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.5 40.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
136.5
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
111.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
84.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
11.3 18.5 21.7 23.3 27.6 29.5 31.5 31.7 32.4 32.9 34.1 34.7 35.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4 16.3 23.8 24.8 25.4 26.3 26.3 26.5 26.8 29.5 29.5 29.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.3 15.1 16.9 17.8 20.4 22.5 22.8 22.8 22.9 23.4 24 25 25.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 18.4 19.7 20.5 20.7 21.2 22 22.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
37.3
53.8
49
46.1
44.3
45.6
Steam Deck 1280x720
41.1
34.1
52
48.8
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
56.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
med. 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
45.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
24.5 29.1 31.9 33.8 36.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.8 22.9 23.5 28.2 28.8 30.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6 21.2 21.2 24.1 25 26.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19 19.1 19.9 23.4 24.4 24.4 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
52.6
52.2
med. 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
15.2 17.3 37.4 44.1 64.6 68.2 70.9 71.5 71.9 72.3 73.1 80.1 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15 25.1 35.4 36.3 59 59.5 62.1 62.9 65.1 65.8 66.8 74.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.6 25.6 26.6 27.1 35.9 37.6 38.7 40.7 44.8 44.9 46.1 50.4 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5 10 11.4 11.5 12.2 12.7 13.5 14 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
93.7
110.9
73.4
72.4
113.9
low 1920x1080
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
62.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
45.7 61 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.4 44.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.6 30.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.7 22.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
69
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
56.2 59.1 72.1 72.4 72.7 73.1 76.3 77.2 77.7 78.2 78.3 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.6 53.9 62.2 65.1 66.6 67 70.8 70.9 71.4 71.6 71.7 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.8 40.9 46.7 51.1 53.3 53.7 55 55.1 56.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 9.3 11.9 14.1 14.4 14.7 14.9 15 15.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
113.4
127.2
86.6
120.3
107.7
120.5
120.8
107.4
low 1920x1080
44.9 47.3 47.4 50.4 53.3 53.8 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.3 36.3 40.6 41.2 42.6 42.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.7 25.7 29.1 30 30.1 31.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.2 20.2 24.1 24.3 25 25.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
80.8
87
81.2
82.5
83.8
82.1
low 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
80
med. 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.2
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
61.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
42.9
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
94.8 143.5 143.6 145.9 147.5 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.8 73.9 75.9 80.4 80.6 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.3 56.4 60 63.2 63.8 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.3 26.2 26.9 28.8 31 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28 (!) 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 27 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
68.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
55.8
low 1280x720
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
65  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
52.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
131.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
88.4
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
121 131.8 141 141.9 144 147.3 151.6 154.8 159.4 165.4 166 173.8 177.4 179.5 189 190.2 205 208 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.7 53 56 57 60.6 61.9 66 67.6 70 70.5 71 71.1 72 73.4 75.4 80.3 84 87.7 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 41 41.4 50.4 52 52.4 53.3 56.4 57.8 57.8 58.9 59 59 59.7 61.4 64 66.7 72.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.1 31 32 35 38.8 38.9 41 43.2 43.8 44 44.3 46.1 46.8 47 47 50.3 52.5 53 58.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
42  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47 54 54 59 61 63 63 63 65 67 69 69 72 84 91 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31 33 35 36 37 37 37 39 39 39 40 44 45 52 54 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22 29 31 33 33 34 35 35 35 36 37 37 37 38 41 48 50 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 27 28 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 35 36 38 45 46 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
38
45
low 1280x720
46.1 47.1 47.4 47.5 49 50.3 50.9 51.4 52 52.2 52.4 52.7 53.4 54.4 54.5 55.4 55.4 56.1 58 61.5 63.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.2 35.8 36 37.7 38.3 38.9 39.2 39.8 40.1 41 41.1 41.1 41.3 42 42.5 44 45.1 46 46.6 46.7 46.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.9 30.2 30.8 31.2 31.3 32 32.1 32.1 32.4 33.4 33.5 35 35.7 36.1 36.8 36.9 37.6 37.8 38.2 38.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
35.6 42.8 43.8 47.6 51.5 52.8 56.6 56.9 57.2 58.1 59.1 61 63 63.3 64 68.4 83.3 84.1 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 29.7 30.3 32.1 32.1 33.5 34.8 35.8 36 36.1 36.3 36.5 37.3 37.9 38 38.8 45 45.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7 17 18.2 19.2 21 21.2 21.8 23.2 23.9 24.1 24.1 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.6 24.9 26.6 30.6 31.7 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.4 14 23 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
78.3 89.9 98.4 98.9 98.9 99.3 99.4 100.9 100.9 101.2 101.7 102.4 102.5 103.2 103.5 104.1 104.6 105.7 106.5 106.8 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.8 69.4 71.4 75.6 75.9 79.2 83 84.3 89.4 90.4 90.9 92.6 92.8 92.9 94.1 94.1 95.3 96.5 96.9 97.4 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.8 57.7 61.5 64.1 66.8 67.2 69.3 70.3 72.3 74.5 74.9 75.7 76 76.7 76.8 77.3 79.1 83 84.6 85.2 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.7 53.3 59.6 60.4 63.6 63.9 66.5 67.1 68.3 71.1 71.1 72.3 73.4 73.6 74 74.4 75.4 75.6 79.8 80.2 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
92 120 126 126 128 131.2 131.3 132 132.9 135.1 135.6 141 142.7 156 157 ~ 132 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
59 68 73 76.8 78 78 79.1 80 88.1 88.2 88.4 89 91.5 97 100 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36 40 40 40.4 42 42.4 44 44.8 51 51.7 54.1 54.3 54.3 56 57 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.5 18.4 19.2 20.1 20.4 20.5 20.8 20.9 23 23.1 23.3 23.8 24.5 24.6 25.1 25.2 25.5 26.1 28 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
53.8
51.7
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
99.1 101.3 102.4 110.5 124.1 126.5 139.1 147.3 153.3 160.3 160.3 161 163.3 166.9 171.5 175 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59.9 85.7 90.4 93.8 107.7 120.8 124.1 134.8 135.8 139.5 148 148.2 152.8 154.9 160.9 164.4 168.4 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.1 22.6 24.2 26.2 31.3 32.2 33.1 33.4 33.5 33.9 34.8 35.2 36.2 36.3 36.9 37.6 41.2 41.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6 10 11 12.1 12.3 12.7 13.1 13.3 13.7 13.8 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.3 14.6 15.9 15.9 16.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
123.9
121.8
108.9
118.4
156
139.7
90.4
69.3
111
101
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
138.3
130.9
130.5
128.3
167.5
152.7
62.9
119.5
122.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dragon's Dogma 21814.5
Horizon Forbidden West30.627.118.516.2
Alone in the Dark69564929
Last Epoch60464034
Skull & Bones36322721
Helldivers 239.23027.527.2
Enshrouded272216.8
Palworld40.637.129.527.3
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown196136128
Ready or Not60.446.945.832.5
The Finals99.568.960.546.4
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora18161411
EA Sports WRC35.826.624.722.4
Lords of the Fallen20.21816.314.2
Total War Pharaoh99695038
Assassin's Creed Mirage34333025
Counter-Strike 2111.184.552.131.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty2825202013.1
Lies of P56.948.141.733.2
The Crew Motorfest32302521
Starfield11.5
Armored Core 65040.136.232.2
Atlas Fallen45.945.739.529.2
Baldur's Gate 331262322
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart28.42925.921.1
F1 2357523612
Resident Evil 4 Remake39.630.526.718.4
Company of Heroes 362.250.13938.6
Sons of the Forest29.82119.418.7
Atomic Heart53402820
Returnal37363228
Hogwarts Legacy25.719.315.6
F1 2272665013
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands50402923
GRID Legends67.751.841.736.6
Dying Light 231.129.9
God of War272418.312.9
Far Cry 661.937.732.127.2
F1 2021135725727
Horizon Zero Dawn58342927
Borderlands 368.538.527.722.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms130594633
Far Cry New Dawn65393735
Metro Exodus52.233.92519.7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider131.462.549.548.2
Strange Brigade16468564342
Far Cry 56540363432
X-Plane 11.11534134
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark58362317
Dota 2 Reborn100867268
The Witcher 3132824722
GTA V1411293313
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
7
20
14
6
12
28
9
2
24
24
2
1
30
14
1
1
3
2




For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 25. 12:19:16

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.034s ... 0.035s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.035s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12086 +0.03s ... 0.065s

#9 got single benchmarks 12086 +0.068s ... 0.133s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.133s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +1.19s ... 1.324s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.324s

#13 Got 885 rows for game benchmarks. +0.207s ... 1.53s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.53s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.04s ... 1.571s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +2.124s ... 3.694s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.007s ... 3.701s

#18 return log +0s ... 3.701s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU graphics card

小米红米本 Pro 16 2024 评测--也许是电池续航时间最长的流星湖笔记本电脑

小米红米本 Pro 16 2024 评测--也许是电池续航时间最长的流星湖笔记本电脑

金属外壳、酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器、32 GB 内存、3K IPS 显示屏和优质键盘,红米笔记本 Pro 16 以不到 1,000 欧元(约合 1,066 美元)的价格提供了所有这些。此外,99 瓦时的大容量电池确保了超长的续航时间,而且还配备了雷电 4。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 评论--配备 OLED 触摸屏的昂贵日常笔记本电脑

三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 评论--配备 OLED 触摸屏的昂贵日常笔记本电脑

Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 是三星专为日常使用设计的轻薄笔记本电脑。它配备了最新的 Meteor Lake 处理器和高分辨率 120-Hz OLED 触摸屏。其性能和电池续航时间均处于平均水平。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
LG Gram 17(2024 年)

LG Gram 17 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测--小幅改进和全新酷睿 Ultra 7

LG 的新款 Gram 保持了该系列的一贯风格。从外观上看,这款轻薄的 17 英寸设备几乎没有任何变化。在内部,这款笔记本电脑采用了流星湖(Meteor Lake)处理器。不过,LG 已经悄悄地、秘密地消除了我们对测试设备前身提出的一些批评意见。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | 17.00" | 1.3 kg
联想 Yoga 9 2 合 1 14IMH9 评测:更小、更轻、更快的 Arc 图形处理器

联想 Yoga 9 2 合 1 14IMH9 评测:更小、更轻、更快的 Arc 图形处理器

Yoga 9 二合一 G9 在多个方面改进了 Yoga 9 二合一 G8,但仍存在一些核心缺点,包括令人遗憾的摩尔纹效果,它使 OLED 显示屏比其他大多数 OLED 笔记本电脑略显粗糙。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
王牌魔术师 F2A

Acemagic F2A 评测:AI 迷你 PC 配备英特尔流星湖酷睿 7 155H 处理器、32 GB DDR5 内存和 Wi-Fi 7

Acemagic 以 F2A 为名销售配备英特尔最新流星湖处理器的高性能办公 PC。我们对搭载英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H 处理器的 Acemagic F2A 进行了仔细研究,并通过一系列基准测试将其与其他高端机型进行了比较。请阅读我们的评测,了解这款迷你 PC 是否值得购买。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | | 768 g

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 笔记本电脑评测: MacBook Air 15 的三星替代产品Apple

AcePC Wizbox AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 0.8 kg
  Review » AcePC Wizbox AI mini PC 评测:英特尔流星湖迷你电脑

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 戴尔 Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 笔记本电脑评测:放弃GeForce RTX,采用集成式英特尔弧光灯

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Slim 7 14 G9 笔记本电脑评测:全新小尺寸,集成 Co-Pilot 键

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 笔记本电脑评测:英特尔 Arc 对决 Radeon 780M

MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.30", 1 kg
  Review » 微星 Prestige 13 AI Evo 笔记本电脑评测--酷睿至尊 7 处理器和 OLED 显示屏,重量不足 1 千克

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook Duo OLED (2024) 可折叠本评测:配备酷睿 Ultra 9 的多任务处理冠军

HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 二合一可折叠 HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测:功能强大的酷睿-超强全能型 OLED 笔记本电脑

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 笔记本电脑评测:三年来首次重大更新

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED 评测--配备 120Hz OLED 和酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器、重量仅 1.2 千克的超轻型笔记本电脑

HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 惠普 Spectre x360 14 评测--配备更大的 120-Hz OLED 的高端可折叠设备

MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 微星 Prestige 16 B1MG 笔记本电脑评测:从酷睿 i7 Xe 到酷睿 Ultra 7 Arc

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 宏碁 Swift Go 14 评测--Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 的人工智能内核令人印象深刻

  Review » 英特尔流星湖分析 - 酷睿至尊 7 155H 仅在 GPU 性能方面令人信服

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  Review » 英特尔流星湖分析 - 酷睿至尊 7 155H 仅在 GPU 性能方面令人信服

LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Q425: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Q425

LG gram Pro 17Z90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 17Z90SP

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360, Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360, Ultra 7 155H

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16

MSI Claw: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Claw

HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng

Lenovo Yoga 9 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 9 14IMH9

HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng

MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72

Medion E15443: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Medion E15443

MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 太贵且内存仅限 16GB

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » 华硕 Zenbook Duo OLED(2024)目前是市场上最好的多屏设备

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
Xclipse 530
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter