Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Intel Intel Graphics 4 Xe3

英特尔图形 4 Xe3 是 Panther Lake SoC 中的集成显卡,具有 4 个 Xe3 内核(32 个 EU / 512 个 ALU)、4 个光线追踪内核和高达 2450 MHz 的时钟频率。与大型 12 核 Arc B390 变体不同的是,GPU 瓦片不是由台积电制造,而是由英特尔制造(ev Intel 4)。

尽管对架构进行了内部改进,但游戏性能应与 AMD Radeon 760M的性能,明显低于 Arc Graphics 140V明显低于 Lunar Lake 中的 Arc Graphics 140V。在 箭湖中的 4 核变体,被称为英特尔图形处理器的 4 核变体应明显胜出。

新的媒体引擎现在支持 AV1 编解码、VVC 解码、AVC 10 位和 eDP 1.5。

芯片组由英特尔公司采用英特尔 3 处理器制造。

Panther Lake Xe3 Series

Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 32 @ 2.5 GHz
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 16
CodenamePanther Lake
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines32 - unified
Raytracing Cores4
Core Speed2500 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU40 TOPS INT8
CacheL2: 4 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
Man. Technology5 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1 FRL, DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20
Date of Announcement05.01.2026
CPU in Intel Graphics 4 Xe3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H16 x 1500 MHz, 25 W? MHz2450 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2300 - 2500 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
438 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
622 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2501 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
12119 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6066     avg: 6296     median: 6309 (10%)     max: 6513 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 6815     avg: 6986     median: 7025 (6%)     max: 7118 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3092     avg: 3246     median: 3250 (8%)     max: 3395 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2800     avg: 2918     median: 2951 (6%)     max: 3003 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -96%
...
2472 -15%
2601 -11%
2657 -9%
2766 -5%
2805 -4%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 -3%
2864 -2%
2881 -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 0%
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
2918
2993 3%
2995 3%
2998 3%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 6%
3123 7%
3139 8%
3155 8%
3193 9%
3223 10%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 698%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 1435%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 26419     avg: 27550     median: 27550 (26%)     max: 28681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36533     avg: 38978     median: 38977.5 (10%)     max: 41422 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6962     avg: 7674     median: 7983 (10%)     max: 8078 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6268     avg: 6943     median: 7243 (6%)     max: 7317 Points
171.8 -98%
...
6407 -8%
6422 -8%
6638 -4%
6702 -3%
6736 -3%
AMD Radeon Pro 460
6749 -3%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
6817 -2%
AMD Radeon R9 M390
6819 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
6894 -1%
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
6943
7042 1%
7061 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
7142 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M
7180 3%
7372 6%
7536 9%
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
7590 9%
7601 9%
7662 10%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 883%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 1769%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 160.4     avg: 183.3     median: 174.5 (10%)     max: 215 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 174.7     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU OpenCL
min: 23271     avg: 23489     median: 23459 (6%)     max: 23736 points
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU Vulkan
min: 21306     avg: 24352     median: 24769 (6%)     max: 26565 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44     avg: 45.9     median: 45.7 (6%)     max: 48 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 47.9     avg: 50.5     median: 50.9 (14%)     max: 52.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.6     avg: 44.6     median: 45.4 (6%)     max: 47.7 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3795     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.4089 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
31
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
55.6 65.9 66.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.7 56.6 64.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.8 41.7 46.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.2 13.8 14.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
32.7 35.2 36.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27 27.7 28.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21 23.8 24.4 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7 19.9 20.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
59.3
58.7
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
7.6
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
18.1
17.1
16.6
low 1920x1080
27.4 28.4 31.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.2 23 23.9 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19 19.6 21 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.7 19.5 20.3 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
40.6
39.7
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
107.3 184.9 197 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.2 64.7 70.5 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.9 58.9 59.1 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.3 50.6 51.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
37.8 43.6 45.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.6 30.9 33 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.9 30.5 32.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
66.3 67.3 72.3 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.9 35.4 36.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.1 25.4 26.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
101.7 102.9 109.6 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
89 89.4 91.5 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.6 73.7 81.8 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.4 69.4 77.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
162.4 165.6 180.8 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
158.1 163 174.7 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51.8 52.9 58.2 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.8 20.9 23.8 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
145.8
144.8
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
156.6
151.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
ARC Raiders48.823.517.511.4
Black Myth: Wukong1814116
F1 2463584314
Cyberpunk 207735282319
Baldur's Gate 329232020
Strange Brigade163585148
X-Plane 11.11423229
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark693626
Dota 2 Reborn105907672
GTA V1701655422
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
3
3
2
4
4
1
1
6
3
1
6
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 12. 14:27:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Apr 2026 05:31:15 +0200 +0.004s ... 0.004s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.019s ... 0.023s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.023s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13353 +0.021s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 13353 +0.021s ... 0.064s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +1.201s ... 1.266s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.266s

#13 Got 98 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 1.288s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.288s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 1.296s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +0.115s ... 1.412s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.201s ... 1.612s

#18 return log +0s ... 1.612s

Notebook reviews with Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU graphics card

三星Galaxy Book6 Pro 笔记本电脑评测--优于新款 XPS 16

三星Galaxy Book6 Pro 笔记本电脑评测--优于新款 XPS 16

三星的新款Galaxy Book6 Pro 配备了英特尔的 Panther Lake 处理器、Wi-Fi 7 以及新的 OLED 触摸屏,亮度终于比以前高了。不过,Galaxy Book6 Pro 的价格非常高,而且面临着出色的对手,那么它是否足以击败 XPS 16 或 Zenbook S16 呢?
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3, 16", 1.6 kg
戴尔 XPS 16 评测:前进两步,后退一步

戴尔 XPS 16 评测:前进两步,后退一步

2026 XPS 16 在效率和设计方面取得了巨大进步。尽管如此,我们还是做出了一些关键的牺牲,这一点值得买家注意。
Intel Core Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3, 16", 1.7 kg
戴尔 XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 评测:依然出色,但不再特别

戴尔 XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 评测:依然出色,但不再特别

如果用户不需要酷睿 Ultra X7 强得多的图形处理能力,那么价格较低的酷睿 Ultra 7 会更有吸引力,尤其是从旧款 XPS 13 或 XPS 14 升级的用户。
Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3, 14", 1.5 kg

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG

Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG

MSI Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » 微星 Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG

MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026): Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026)

Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA

Dell XPS 14 (2026) DA14260: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 戴尔 XPS 14 (2026) DA14260

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i 14IPH11

Dell XPS 16 (2026) DA16260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 16 (2026) DA16260

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book6 Pro 是一款不错的多媒体笔记本电脑,但 2100 美元太贵了

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.7 kg
   » 2026 戴尔 XPS 16 运行温度明显高于上一代机型

   » Panther Lake XPS 16 非常高效,空闲时功耗仅为 1.5 瓦,电池寿命超长

   » Core Ultra 5 325 的首次基准测试结果与 Core Ultra 7 355 几乎完全相同。

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 根据首次基准测试,英特尔 4 Xe3 GPU 比旗舰产品 Arc B390 慢 50% 以上

   » 首批酷睿至尊 7 355 基准测试结果出炉,其性能远不及酷睿至尊 X7

Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book6 系列上手体验:所有型号、价格和上市日期

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P500 *
Vega 10
Vega 9
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter