Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Intel Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL

英特尔图形 4 Xe3 是 Panther Lake SoC 中的集成显卡，具有 4 个 Xe3 内核（32 个 EU / 512 个 ALU）、4 个光线追踪内核和高达 2450 MHz 的时钟频率。与大型 12 核 Arc B390 变体不同的是，GPU 瓦片不是由台积电制造，而是由英特尔制造（ev Intel 4）。

尽管对架构进行了内部改进，但游戏性能应与 AMD Radeon 760M的性能，明显低于 Arc Graphics 140V明显低于 Lunar Lake 中的 Arc Graphics 140V。在 箭湖中的 4 核变体，被称为英特尔图形处理器的 4 核变体应明显胜出。

新的媒体引擎现在支持 AV1 编解码、VVC 解码、AVC 10 位和 eDP 1.5。

芯片组由英特尔公司采用英特尔 3 处理器制造。

Arc Xe3 Series

Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU 96 @ 2.5 GHz
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU 80 @ 2.4 GHz
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL 32 @ 2.5 GHz
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL 16
CodenamePanther Lake
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines32 - unified
Raytracing Cores4
Core Speed2500 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU40 TOPS INT8
CacheL2: 4 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
Man. Technology5 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1 FRL, DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20
Date of Announcement05.01.2026
CPU in Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTLGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H16 x 1500 MHz, 25 W? MHz2450 MHz
» show 5 more
min. - max.? MHz2300 - 2500 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.1 pt (9%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.0639 -98%
...
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.79 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.88 -7%
AMD Radeon 760M
2.89 -7%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.9 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.97 -4%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
3 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
3.02 -3%
AMD Radeon 680M
3.02 -3%
AMD FirePro W7170M
3.06 -1%
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
3.1
AMD Radeon 860M
3.14 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
3.23 4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
3.23 4%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.23 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
3.29 6%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
3.35 8%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3.35 8%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.4 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.41 10%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
22.7 632%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 974%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 413     avg: 476.3     median: 447 (3%)     max: 564 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 519     avg: 585     median: 613 (4%)     max: 622 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 2213     avg: 2350     median: 2343 (5%)     max: 2501 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 17209     avg: 19204     median: 19203.5 (10%)     max: 21198 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
5526 Points (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
12119 Points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4771     avg: 6200     median: 6327 (10%)     max: 6763 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5127     avg: 6840     median: 7030 (6%)     max: 7415 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
185618 Points (21%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2392     avg: 3189     median: 3237 (8%)     max: 3518 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2117     avg: 2854     median: 2905 (6%)     max: 3136 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -96%
...
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
2378 -17%
AMD Radeon 860M
2446 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
2472 -13%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
2601 -9%
Qualcomm Adreno X2-85
2605 -9%
AMD Radeon 780M
2659 -7%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
2766 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
2805 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 -1%
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
2854
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
2864 0%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
2881 1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 2%
Intel Arc A350M
2993 5%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2995 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2998 5%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 8%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3123 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3139 10%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 716%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44063 1444%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 23108     avg: 29181     median: 29355 (28%)     max: 34848 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 30345     avg: 40249     median: 41335 (10%)     max: 46309 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5964     avg: 7844     median: 8078 (10%)     max: 8558 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 5433     avg: 7128     median: 7317 (6%)     max: 7678 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -98%
...
AMD Radeon 740M
6465 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
6638 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
6736 -5%
AMD Radeon Pro 460
6749 -5%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
6817 -4%
AMD Radeon R9 M390
6819 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
6894 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
7042 -1%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
7061 -1%
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
7128
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
7142 0%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M
7180 1%
AMD Radeon 840M
7345 3%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
7372 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
7536 6%
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
7590 6%
Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45
7647 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
7662 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
7692 8%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 858%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 1721%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 103     avg: 182     median: 178.1 (10%)     max: 216 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 161.1     median: 104.6 (1%)     max: 315 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 7.0 - Geekbench 7.0 GPU OpenCL
min: 17946     avg: 21687     median: 23544 (12%)     max: 23570 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
min: 21473     avg: 23646     median: 23676.5 (6%)     max: 25097 points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
min: 21306     avg: 24930     median: 25255 (6%)     max: 28602 points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40     avg: 46.8     median: 47.2 (6%)     max: 51.8 Watt
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 26.3     avg: 48.8     median: 49.9 (14%)     max: 59.6 Watt
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.8     avg: 47.8     median: 47.6 (6%)     max: 59.6 Watt
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3305     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.4815 fps per Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

007 First Light

007 First Light

2026
low 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Pragmata

Pragmata

2026
low 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crimson Desert

Crimson Desert

2026
low 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Resident Evil Requiem

Resident Evil Requiem

2026
low 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

2025
low 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
59.8 62 65.5 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.3 53 54.6 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.4 39 41.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
11
11.8
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

2025
low 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

2024
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
31
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
33.1 53.5 55.6 60.4 62.5 64.1 65.9 66.7 66.8 66.9 67.2 68 69.3 73.4 76.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.6 49.7 52.7 56.6 57 57.5 61.3 61.5 62.3 63.8 64.1 64.1 64.3 67.6 70.5 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.6 37.7 40.8 41.7 42.2 42.4 43 45.8 46.1 46.1 46.5 46.7 48 50.3 50.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7 11.4 12.9 13.2 13.8 14.1 14.2 14.2 14.3 14.7 14.8 14.8 14.9 15.1 15.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

2023
low 1920x1080
30.8 32.7 34.3 35.1 35.2 35.3 36.8 36.8 37.1 37.3 37.3 38.6 38.6 38.7 38.8 38.8 39 39.2 39.4 40.2 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.6 25.8 26 26.3 26.4 26.9 27 27.7 28.2 28.4 28.8 29.1 29.1 29.2 29.3 29.5 29.8 29.8 29.8 30.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.4 20.7 21 21.1 21.2 22.1 22.1 23.8 24.4 24.4 24.5 25 25.1 25.3 25.4 25.5 25.6 25.7 26.1 26.8 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8 17.6 17.7 17.7 19 19.1 19.9 19.9 20.2 20.5 20.8 21.1 21.2 21.5 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.7 21.8 22.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
59.3
58.7
65
62
66.2
61.3
61.6
65.1
48.6
64.4
68.3
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
7.6
8.3
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
18.1
19.1
17.1
18.6
16.6
20.8
18.2
20
14.9
19.6
20.1
20.1
17.6
17.7
19.7
17.1
20.5
19.9
18.4
18.3
20.9
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
26.4 27.4 28.1 28.4 28.7 29.2 31.4 31.5 31.5 31.6 31.9 32.5 32.9 33 33.1 33.3 33.6 34.3 34.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21 22.1 22.1 22.2 22.9 23 23.1 23.9 25.1 25.6 25.6 26 26.1 26.3 27 27.1 27.1 27.4 27.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18 19 19.4 19.4 19.6 19.6 19.9 21 21.7 21.9 21.9 22.1 22.9 23.1 23.5 23.7 23.7 23.9 24.3 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.7 18.7 19 19.2 19.4 19.4 19.5 20.3 21.2 21.4 21.6 22.1 22.4 22.8 23 23.1 23.2 23.5 23.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
40.6
39.7
47.1
45.3
46.5
40.9
45.1
47.9
36.9
46.8
47.7
46.8
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
86.8 107.3 118.5 119.6 142.1 172.6 173.9 184.9 187.5 190.5 190.6 192.1 195.4 197 197.9 198.1 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.6 38.2 45.4 46.2 53.8 64.7 68 68.3 69.7 70.4 70.5 71.8 72.5 76.2 77.1 81.1 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.7 35.9 38.1 39.9 45.5 56.7 56.8 56.9 58.8 58.9 59.1 60 61.9 62 62.1 64.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 28.9 34.2 40.9 43.3 47.2 48 48.5 50.6 51.1 52.1 52.2 52.4 53 54.6 56.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
33 34.8 35 36 36.2 37 37.3 37.6 37.8 40.4 40.5 40.9 41.7 41.7 42.2 43.6 44.6 45.1 45.3 45.6 45.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.6 27.2 28.8 28.9 29.2 29.4 29.6 29.6 30.6 30.9 31 32.6 32.8 33 33.2 33.5 34.3 35.4 36 37 37.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.2 22.9 24.7 25.2 25.5 26.6 27.3 27.6 27.8 28.6 29.5 29.6 30.1 30.1 30.5 30.7 30.7 31.1 32.4 33.2 33.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
34.3 53.7 58 58.8 64.3 64.5 66.3 66.9 67.3 67.5 68.4 69 69.4 72.3 73 73.4 74.1 74.4 76.4 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.6 29 30.7 31.5 34.5 34.6 34.9 35.4 36.2 36.3 36.6 36.7 36.8 37.2 37.3 37.5 37.6 37.7 39.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8 21.7 22.5 24.5 24.8 25.1 25.1 25.4 25.8 25.9 26 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.8 27.1 27.2 27.2 27.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
74 101.7 102.9 103.9 104.1 105.1 107.1 108.3 109.6 110.2 112.3 123.9 128.1 129 133.5 139.2 143.4 145.2 148.9 158.9 177 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53.3 67.5 68.2 70.2 72.4 72.7 73.5 74.9 80.3 82.1 88.5 89 89.4 89.9 90 91.5 93.3 95.9 96.1 99.2 109.1 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.3 71.5 72.6 73.5 73.7 75.1 77.7 79.5 81.2 81.6 81.8 81.9 82.1 82.1 85.4 85.8 87.6 89.7 92.6 94 97.8 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.7 65.7 68.4 69.4 69.6 70.7 73 74.2 77.3 77.4 77.8 77.8 79.9 80.3 81 83.3 84.3 84.9 89.7 90.7 91.7 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
93.7 146.6 146.6 153.6 157.9 162.4 162.6 165.6 167.7 168.5 169.3 169.3 170.2 170.4 172 177.4 180.8 182 182.4 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.8 129.4 137.9 145.9 149.5 150.4 154.6 156.4 157.2 158.1 158.4 161.6 162.7 163 164.3 168.9 170.6 171 174.7 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.4 39.2 45.9 46.6 48.3 48.4 50.6 51.1 51.4 51.5 51.8 52.4 52.8 52.9 53.7 54.8 54.8 55.2 58.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.3 15.7 18 18.8 19.8 20.4 20.8 20.9 21 21.1 21.6 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.9 22 23.8 23.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
145.8
144.8
153.6
133.4
139.2
126.6
155.3
159.6
143.8
149.3
153.6
102.5
127.9
157.3
65.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
156.6
151.1
160.9
133.2
144.6
131.2
161.1
169.5
148.9
156.6
163.9
106.1
149
167
68.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
007 First Light1714.813.612.8
Pragmata27.720.816.6
Crimson Desert16.513.91312.4
Resident Evil Requiem25.318.816.28.21
Call of Duty Black Ops 75247339
ARC Raiders48.823.517.511.4
F1 2562534010
Kingdom Come Deliverance 232.723.718.812.6
Black Myth: Wukong1814116
F1 2463594314
Counter-Strike 278.859.133.420.9
Cyberpunk 207737282420
Baldur's Gate 331252221
Strange Brigade166635346
X-Plane 11.11403229
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark663525
Dota 2 Reborn122838177
GTA V1631545020
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		5
6
4
3		9
6
2
1		11
6
1
13
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon: No results found for your request.

v1.35
log 08. 22:02:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Oct 2026 05:31:56 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.018s ... 0.02s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#7 composed specs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#9 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13353 +0.031s ... 0.051s

#11 got single benchmarks 13353 +0.084s ... 0.135s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.135s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +1.515s ... 1.651s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.651s

#15 Got 605 rows for game benchmarks. +0.121s ... 1.772s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.772s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 1.785s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.19s ... 1.975s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.72s ... 2.695s

#20 return log +0s ... 2.695s

Notebook reviews with Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU graphics card

最高支持 72 GB 内存且易于维修——Schenker Element 16 E26 笔记本电脑评测

最高支持 72 GB 内存且易于维修——Schenker Element 16 E26 笔记本电脑评测

Schenker Element 16 是一款全新的 16 英寸多媒体/商务笔记本电脑，搭载英特尔 Panther Lake 处理器，重点强调可维修性和可升级性。它配备了一块优质的 120 Hz 哑光 IPS 屏幕，电池续航时间较长，但集成显卡性能较弱，扬声器效果欠佳。
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 16", 1.9 kg
戴尔 Pro 7 14 P714260 评测：坚持使用英特尔处理器有其优势

戴尔 Pro 7 14 P714260 评测：坚持使用英特尔处理器有其优势

戴尔旗舰级 Pro 7 14 商务笔记本提供 AMD 和 Intel 两种版本，两者的价格非常接近。不过，在测试过这两种版本后，对于大多数用户而言，除非有特定的偏好，否则无论选择哪一种都不会错。
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 1.4 kg
配备 32 GB 内存的轻量级高性能笔记本电脑：HP EliteBook X G2i 评测

配备 32 GB 内存的轻量级高性能笔记本电脑：HP EliteBook X G2i 评测

联想推出了ThinkPad X1 Carbon，惠普则推出了EliteBook X。这款高端商务笔记本电脑的最新机型——惠普EliteBook X G2i，采用强劲的英特尔Panther Lake处理器、32 GB内存以及5G网络，并拥有轻巧、高品质的设计——堪称完美组合。
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 1.2 kg
戴尔 Pro 7 13 2-in-1 变形本评测：专为办公设计

戴尔 Pro 7 13 2-in-1 变形本评测：专为办公设计

戴尔 Pro 7 13 二合一笔记本在牺牲花哨的显示选项和图形性能的同时，优化了易用性和连接功能。打字者和使用扩展坞的用户会发现它有很多值得称道之处，但偶尔进行图形编辑的用户可能需要另寻他款。
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 13.3", 1.4 kg
华硕 ExpertBook P5605CAA 评测：用英特尔酷睿 Ultra 取代 AMD 锐龙

华硕 ExpertBook P5605CAA 评测：用英特尔酷睿 Ultra 取代 AMD 锐龙

与 AMD 版本不同，我们的 Intel 版本配备了 Thunderbolt 4 接口，且尽管电池容量较小，但续航时间更长。尽管如此，仍存在一些明显的取舍，包括处理器性能略有下降，以及内存支持“仅”最高 64 GB（而非 96 GB）。
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 16", 1.8 kg

HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI 评测：惠普迄今为止性能最强的二合一笔记本，也是价格最高的机型之一

Dell 16S DS16260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 戴尔 16S DS16260 评测：比戴尔 16 Plus 更出色

Dell 14S DS14260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 戴尔 14S DS14260 评测：性能媲美 XPS 14

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » 电池续航时间近24小时的旗舰商务笔记本——联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon第14代评测

Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 华硕 ZenBook S14 2026 笔记本评测——OLED 屏幕更亮，但 Panther Lake 集成显卡运行缓慢

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL 21UX005PGE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 配备 32 GB DDR5 内存且价格亲民：联想 ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL 笔记本评测

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 第11代评测：联想迄今为止最具吸引力的二合一笔记本

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  Review » 微星 Prestige 13 AI+ 笔记本电脑评测：旅途中的完美伴侣？

MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 0.6 kg
  Review » 微星 Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG 评测：拥有高达 128 GB 内存的迷你 PC

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 21WN00A0GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 新的维修冠军联想 ThinkPad T14 7 代笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 评测：XPS 14 的最佳替代品

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy Book6 Pro 笔记本电脑评测--优于新款 XPS 16

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » 戴尔 XPS 16 评测：前进两步，后退一步

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 戴尔 XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 评测：依然出色，但不再特别

Asus VivoBook S16 S3607AA: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S16 S3607AA - 评测与配置

HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI - 评测与配置

MSI Modern 14S AI+ G3MG: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14S AI+ G3MG - 评测与配置

Acer TravelMate P2 TMP214-57: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P2 TMP214-57 - 评测与配置

Dell XPS 14 (2026), Ultra 5 325: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 戴尔 XPS 14 (2026)、Ultra 5 325 - 评测与配置

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-I71: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-I71 - 评测与配置

Lenovo Yoga 9 2in1 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 9 2in1 14IPH11 - 评测与配置

HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 14-hh0000: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 14-hh0000 - 评测与配置

Dell 14S DS14260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » 戴尔 14S DS14260 - 评测与配置

Dell 16S DS16260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » 戴尔 16S DS16260 - 评测与配置

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 - 评测与配置

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 OLED: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00"
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 OLED - 评测与配置

MSI Modern 16S AI+ G3M: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 16S AI+ G3M - 评测与配置

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE - 评测与配置

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G7: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » 联想 ThinkPad T14 G7 - 评测与配置

HP OmniBook Ultra AI 14-kd0000: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook Ultra AI 14-kd0000 - 评测与配置

HP OmniBook 5 16-bm0000: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 16-bm0000 - 评测与配置

Honor MagicBook 16 2026: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook 16 2026 - 评测与配置

Asus Vivobook 14 X1407AA: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14 X1407AA - 评测与配置

HP OmniBook X 14-ka0000ng: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 14-ka0000ng - 评测与配置

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL - 评测与配置

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G14: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G14 - 评测与配置

Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8: Intel Core Ultra 5 335, 13.80", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 微软 Surface 8 13.8 笔记本电脑

HP OmniBook X 14-ka: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 14-ka

Asus Vivobook 16 X1607AA: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16 X1607AA

Microsoft Surface Pro 13 (2026): Intel Core Ultra 5 335, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » 微软 Surface Pro 13 (2026)

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IPH11

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » 联想 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ D3M: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 AI+ D3M

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » 三星 Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG

Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG

MSI Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » 微星 Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG

MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026): Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026)

Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA

Dell XPS 14 (2026) DA14260: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 戴尔 XPS 14 (2026) DA14260

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » 联想 Yoga Slim 7i 14IPH11

Dell XPS 16 (2026) DA16260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » 戴尔 XPS 16 (2026) DA16260

HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G14 与惠普 EliteBook X G2i：商务笔记本对决

   » ePrivacy 屏幕：购买笔记本电脑时请避免选择此功能

   » 接近“Lunar Lake”的水准：英特尔兑现了“Panther Lake”在能效方面的承诺

Schenker Element 16 E26: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Schenker Element 16 评测结论——一款可更换部件的优秀全能型产品

HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 这款笔记本电脑的可维修性功能终于卷土重来

   » 最佳笔记本电脑键盘之一：惠普应该在所有产品上都采用这种设计

   » 速度提升32%：这款高端惠普笔记本电脑经过Panther Lake升级改造

HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » 如果不需要 vPro 功能，EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 只有一种配置值得购买

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2026 与 2019 款对比——这真的算进步吗？

   » 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 第 14 代评测结论——一款出色的商务笔记本电脑，但需注意显示屏

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 OLED: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00"
   » 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 第 14 代 OLED 与 IPS 对比——一个艰难的抉择

Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 新款华硕 ZenBook S14 2026 是一款出色的笔记本电脑，但它理应搭载配备 Arc B390 集成显卡的 Core Ultra X 处理器。

   » 纤薄的华硕 ZenBook S14 凸显了英特尔 Panther Lake 处理器存在的一个重大问题

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL 21UX005PGE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 这款配备 32 GB 内存的联想笔记本电脑为未来的升级提供了巨大的潜力

   » 为什么像这款联想ThinkBook这样的2026款笔记本电脑将面临一场艰苦的竞争

   » 这款14英寸的联想笔记本电脑表明，配备32 GB内存的电脑价格正变得越来越高

   » 存储新时代：中国制造的笔记本电脑固态硬盘首次在联想笔记本电脑上进行测试

   » ThinkBook 还是 ThinkPad？我们对比了两款热门的 14 英寸联想笔记本电脑

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » ThinkPad X1 第11代二合一笔记本的触控笔充电功能虽然很棒，但缺点也很明显

   » 仅有一款 ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 第 11 代机型在图形性能方面实现了显著提升

MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 0.6 kg
   » 微星Cubi AI+ 3MG比以前快了60%以上，但它本可以做得更好

   » 微星 Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG 微型电脑支持 128 GB 超大可移动内存

   » 微星 Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG 与 Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG：几乎无处不在的改进

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 21WN00A0GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 内存危机的后果联想ThinkPad T14 7代的屏幕降级

   » Lunar Lake 仍是英特尔电池续航时间之王：ThinkPad T14 第七代与 T14 第六代对比

   » 新款 ThinkPad T14 7 代终于解决了键盘问题

   » 一个有争议的设计变更：联想 ThinkPad T14 7 代与 T14 6 代照片对比

   » ThinkPad T14 第 7 代：这些功能可在 Linux 下使用，而这些功能不能在 Linux 下使用

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
   » 联想笔记本电脑的高刷新率显示器一直设置为 60 赫兹。以下是简单的修复方法

   » 联想 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14 Aura 是采用酷睿 Ultra X7 处理器的最轻便笔记本之一，但有一个问题

   » 联想 Yoga Slim 7i Ultra Aura 比戴尔 XPS 14 便宜 300 多美元，内存是后者的两倍

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book6 Pro 是一款不错的多媒体笔记本电脑，但 2100 美元太贵了

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.7 kg
   » 2026 戴尔 XPS 16 运行温度明显高于上一代机型

   » Panther Lake XPS 16 非常高效，空闲时功耗仅为 1.5 瓦，电池寿命超长

   » Core Ultra 5 325 的首次基准测试结果与 Core Ultra 7 355 几乎完全相同。

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 根据首次基准测试，英特尔 4 Xe3 GPU 比旗舰产品 Arc B390 慢 50% 以上

   » 首批酷睿至尊 7 355 基准测试结果出炉，其性能远不及酷睿至尊 X7

Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book6 系列上手体验：所有型号、价格和上市日期

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Radeon RX 6850M XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Radeon 8065S
Radeon 8060S
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 7700S
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop
Radeon RX 6700M
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M4 Max 32-Core GPU *
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
M5 Pro 20-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
A770M
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M5 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU
Radeon RX 6600S
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M
Radeon 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU
A370M
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon 890M
Arc 140T
Radeon RX 6450M *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 8-Core
X2-90 *
X2-85 *
Arc 140V
M4 9-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon 880M
GeForce MX570
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
T1200 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Adreno 850 *
Adreno 840 *
M4 8-Core GPU *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
T600 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Adreno 830 *
Adreno 829 *
Adreno 840 V Series *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
A310
Radeon 780M
GeForce MX550
Arc 7-Core
A350M
Arc 130V
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 860M
Radeon 680M
T550 Laptop GPU
T500 Laptop GPU
GeForce MX450
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL
Radeon 760M
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Adreno X2-45 *
Radeon 840M
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 740M
Radeon 660M
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon 540X *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Vega 10
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Vega 9
Vega 8 *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
GeForce MX230
Radeon 820M
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce MX130
CXTP-48-1536 *
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 6 *
GeForce MX110
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs *
Intel Graphics 1 Xe3 WCL *
Vega 3
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter