Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 是一款用于笔记本电脑的 Blackwell 系列移动显卡,Team Green 于 2025 年 4 月推出,并于 5 月上市。它基于 GB206 芯片,提供 3328 个着色器/CUDA 内核、104 个张量内核和 26 个光线追踪单元。8 GB GDDR7 显存通过 128 位内存总线连接。GPU 的其他功能还包括原生 PCIe 5 支持、DisplayPort 2.1a、DirectX 12_2 Ultimate 以及 DLSS4 和 Reflex 2 支持。

性能

一如既往,性能取决于 RTX 5060 Laptop 的散热和最大功耗(TGP)。在合成基准测试中,新显卡仅领先于旧显卡 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU在合成基准测试中。不过,在我们的游戏测试中,移动 RTX 4070 仍然略胜一筹。因此,建议在要求苛刻的游戏(如《F1 25》)中以最高设置和 DLSS 或略微降低的细节级别进行 QHD 游戏。

功耗

该芯片的 TGP 可配置为 45 瓦至 100 瓦,并可相应地采用不同的时钟频率。例如,在 45 瓦 TGP 的情况下,GP 的时钟频率为 952 - 1455 MHz,在 100 瓦的情况下,时钟频率为 1950 - 2310 MHz。

该芯片采用台积电 5 纳米工艺(4N FinFET)生产。

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X4
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines3328 - unified
TMUs104
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores26
Tensor / AI Cores104
Core Speed952 - 1455 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance9.684 TFLOPS FP16, 9.684 TFLOPS FP32
AI GPU572 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 3.3 MB, L2: 32 MB
Memory Speed24000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth384 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption100 Watt (45 - 100 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count21.9 Billion
Die Size 181 mm²
Man. Technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 2.1a
FeaturesDLSS4, Reflex 2, CUDA 12.8
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
PredecessorGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
11.6 pt (35%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 2585     avg: 2785     median: 2785 (19%)     max: 2985 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 2072     avg: 2545     median: 2589 (18%)     max: 2806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 11681     avg: 11931     median: 11804 (27%)     max: 12307 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
22281 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 21242     avg: 27584     median: 27579 (42%)     max: 31650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 26022     avg: 31075     median: 31012 (28%)     max: 33912 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
258515 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 9228     avg: 11671     median: 11779 (31%)     max: 12847 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 9090     avg: 11529     median: 11863.5 (24%)     max: 12322 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -99%
...
10046 -13%
10206 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
10301 -11%
10455 -9%
10478 -9%
10681 -7%
10783 -6%
10946 -5%
11067 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
11529
11609 1%
11837 3%
11850 3%
12640 10%
12806 11%
13241 15%
15184 32%
16308 41%
16742 45%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 102%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 288%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 47731     avg: 58180     median: 53299 (50%)     max: 70684 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 86886     avg: 134968     median: 141578 (35%)     max: 168524 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 26544     avg: 33034     median: 33270 (40%)     max: 36789 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 31549     avg: 38549     median: 39295.5 (30%)     max: 41490 Points
171.8 -100%
...
35743 -7%
35944 -7%
36101 -6%
36164 -6%
AMD Radeon 8050S
36323 -6%
37375 -3%
37918 -2%
38052 -1%
38259 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
38549
39402 2%
40391 5%
40462 5%
41630 8%
42016 9%
43219 12%
44148 15%
44215 15%
46877 22%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 77%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 237%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
81794 Points (24%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
84501 Points (46%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
54494 Points (71%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 38     avg: 50.7     median: 40 (6%)     max: 186 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 21     avg: 22.9     median: 21 (8%)     max: 28 Seconds
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
14418 points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100.6 fps (33%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 188.3     avg: 250.6     median: 248 (14%)     max: 350 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
122.5 fps (46%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
277.7 fps (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
648 fps (48%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 37.8     avg: 156.5     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 104228     avg: 108607     median: 108363 (28%)     max: 116422 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 91239     avg: 99361     median: 103461 (26%)     max: 105121 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
6266 Samples/s (23%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
12980 Samples/s (23%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
24812 points (21%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.5     avg: 139.5     median: 147.2 (20%)     max: 183 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 109.7     avg: 169.7     median: 169 (47%)     max: 220 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.4     avg: 165.3     median: 165 (21%)     max: 212 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3673     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.576 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Resident Evil Requiem

Resident Evil Requiem

2026
low 1920x1080
147.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
101.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
94.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
2.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Max Settings + Path Tracing + DLSS Balanced 1920x1080
31.3
Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
127 130 130 138 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95 95 96 103 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32 36 36 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
37  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
med. 1920x1080
69 73.8 80.7 91.3 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50 55.4 59.4 67 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.1 28.4 30.5 33.9 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
102 110.1 118.4 136.7 ~ 117 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
79.9 88.6 93.5 104.9 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55 59.8 61.9 70.2 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
47.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
71.5 82.1 83.4 91.7 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.3 65 66.3 72.7 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.1 35.7 37.1 40.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
26.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
47.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
42.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34.7 40.3 41.2 48.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.7 31.6 34.1 39.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.3 20.5 21.2 24.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
21.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
184.4 189.8 210 263 ~ 212 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
152 174.9 177.1 190.4 217 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
146 152.7 154 165.5 174.4 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 21.8 24 25 25.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.3 11.7 13 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
18.3 21 21.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
46.3
46.3
50
48.9
low 1920x1080
58.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.6 52.6 63.2 64.4 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
44.1 48.6 57.5 57.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.8 47.1 56.4 57.3 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.4 35 38.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.7  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
22.7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
48 52.8 55.1 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
48.2 61 66.9 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.7 48.2 54.9 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.8 26.5 29.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
12.7 13.8 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
25.3 30 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
50 57 61 66 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 53 56 58 61 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45 46 46 49 53 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31 33 35 36 40 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25 26 28 29 34 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
24 33 41 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
55
med. 1920x1080
163.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
148.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
96  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
49.4 80.1 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.2 53.8 68.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6 33.5 36.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.9 17.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.6  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
25.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
77.6 102.8 106.3 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64.9 85.9 86 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.1 60.4 61.1 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
43.6 45.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
57.4 57.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
102.1 127.7 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.8 54.9 68.1 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.3 14.1 15.6 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
4.2 9.4 10.1 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
5.3  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
54.3 58.8 63.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
48.5 52.3 56.3 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.1 42 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.8 32.4 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.8 70.1 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
83.8 84.9 88.6 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62 62.5 65.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
45.4 47.9 49.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.2 35.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
43.5 46.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
66 78.7 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65.7 77.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
65.2 76.7 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
54 55.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.8 70.3 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
46.5 51.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
43.6 46.8 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
37.8 38.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
27.2 27.6 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
37.9 38.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
83 100 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63 73 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48 58 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 31 32 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19 22 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
30 36 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
31
29
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
181.2 243 255 273 284 ~ 247 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
176.8 219 231 254 268 275 ~ 237 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
154.3 195 206 214 219 230 ~ 203 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.1 68.6 70.9 71 71.6 77.5 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.8 39 42.6 44.5 45.7 49.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.7  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
9.2  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
46 65 66.5 70.4 71.4 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
53.7 55.8 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.6 40.8 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28.4 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
42.8 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
78.7 87.1 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.1 76.7 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59 60.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
46.1 46.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
60.2 61.9 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
78.3 93.8 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.8 60.6 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.9 60 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
47 48.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.9 60.6 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
66.2 72.6 79 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.1 67.4 71.6 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.6 61.7 66.6 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31.2 36.7 39.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
30.5
24.3
low 1920x1080
121.1 123.9 128.9 133.6 142.3 146.9 153.3 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92.4 104.3 107.3 107.4 107.6 109.2 110.6 110.6 112 117.8 118.1 124.5 125.1 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.9 86.7 92.5 93.2 93.4 93.5 93.9 95.3 95.6 100.6 100.8 104 104.4 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.1 75 80.1 81.8 83.2 83.3 84.3 85 86.6 87.2 88.6 89.9 90 90.8 94.9 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.1 48.5 53.5 54.1 55.4 55.5 56.1 57 57.9 58.8 59.2 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.5 25.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
32.7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.9 63.9 65.2 67.7 69.6 70 71.7 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
178.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
39.8
32.5
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
2.7
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
80
82.5
77.5
82
72.9
75.6
78.1
55.8
81.1
75.9
85.6
62.4
75.2
low 1920x1080
135.9 151.1 155.8 158.5 166.1 170 173.3 ~ 159 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
95 96.2 114.2 115.7 117 119.2 121.3 124.3 125.2 128.5 133 134.9 144.6 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
81.1 93 94.1 95.4 97.5 105.7 106 106.7 110.4 112.8 113 117 118 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
78.1 78.7 90 90.7 93.3 95.6 96.8 101 105.3 105.5 109.1 110.7 111.2 113.4 115.6 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58.4 62.6 67.9 70.2 71.8 72.1 75.5 76.7 78 78.1 78.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.8 38.8 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
56.5 63.8 65.8 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
101.3 105.9 114.1 114.3 119.1 ~ 111 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
213.3
242
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
356 401 492 515 601 610 648 ~ 518 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
260 286 288 303 312 319 343 344 348 ~ 311 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
219 227 238 248 253 269 273 275 279 ~ 253 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
191.1 195 217.8 219 223 231 235 239 240 ~ 221 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
133.7 152 155.7 157.8 159.6 162 164.3 165 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
72.8 83 86.1 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
99.8 107.5 117.9 122.6 125.4 135 135.6 137.9 142.5 164.2 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79.8 87 97.7 98.3 105.2 108.3 108.9 112.2 118.3 118.4 120.8 126.8 142.9 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.2 72.1 79.6 83.4 91.9 92.4 93.6 93.9 97.3 98.6 102.8 105.6 118.4 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
62.9 99.2 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
204 212 215 221 227 228 232 ~ 220 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125.7 142 143.7 143.9 153.9 164.6 167.4 167.6 177.6 178.6 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107 109.5 110 111 118.1 119.5 121.1 126 130.4 133.6 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
79.1 87 88.2 88.2 89.8 89.9 92.2 94 95.8 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45 50.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
142.6 162 172.8 182 184.5 195.1 206 215 221 268 ~ 195 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.3 133.9 136.3 145.2 147.8 156.4 163.4 168.2 178.3 182.1 187.6 190.7 232 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118.7 125.7 140.7 141.7 141.8 150.9 154.4 163.6 171.9 176.6 184.2 185 223 ~ 160 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115 121.5 133.2 134.7 139.4 142.3 144.6 150.6 156.1 161.6 163.7 170.9 201 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
105.2 124.4 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
183.6 184.1 186.8 187.9 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
171.7 176.9 178.4 178.9 181.1 183.8 184.7 186.2 187.8 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
160.3 160.3 170.1 176.1 176.3 177.3 179.6 179.7 181.9 185.7 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103.5 108.7 120 120.1 120.6 123.8 127.5 128.5 128.5 133.5 142.9 146.3 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
96.7 100.9 106.4 107 114.3 115.2 116 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
90.2 106 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
47.9
53.9
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
184.6
185.5
180.1
187.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
187.7
187.2
184.7
187.8
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Resident Evil Requiem147.8101.394.143.419.62.84
Call of Duty Black Ops 7145131973621
Anno 117: Pax Romana79582923.4
ARC Raiders117926247.8
The Outer Worlds 282663626.7
Battlefield 670.136
Borderlands 442.841332111.5
F1 252121821592311
Doom: The Dark Ages58.55752513511.7
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered59492613
Assassin's Creed Shadows595548352814
Civilization 7163.1148.696
Monster Hunter Wilds655649.7291610.6
Kingdom Come Deliverance 296795645
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle115591285.3
Stalker 259524232
Call of Duty Black Ops 6144131938464
Until Dawn86634834
Space Marine 272727155
Star Wars Outlaws49453827
Black Myth: Wukong92685330219
F1 24247237203684210.7
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2554029
Ghost of Tsushima83756046
Horizon Forbidden West86605648
Alan Wake 27366613612.1
Cyberpunk 207713611195855523
Baldur's Gate 31591211041007237
Strange Brigade51831125322115681
X-Plane 11.111291109281
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark2201561198948
Dota 2 Reborn195165160149115
GTA V18618117512510898
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
4
12

8
13
10

11
15
6
6
11
8
3
13
12
5
1
9
2
4

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 13. 22:11:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:31:10 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.016s ... 0.018s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.018s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.018s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.018s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.02s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12924 +0.034s ... 0.054s

#13 got single benchmarks 12924 +0.075s ... 0.129s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.129s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +1.533s ... 1.661s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.661s

#17 Got 705 rows for game benchmarks. +0.214s ... 1.876s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.876s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.023s ... 1.899s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.389s ... 2.288s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.128s ... 2.416s

#22 return log +0s ... 2.416s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop graphics card

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 评测:德国经济型游戏笔记本电脑能否与大型厂商一较高下?

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 评测:德国经济型游戏笔记本电脑能否与大型厂商一较高下?

Medion 希望通过 Erazer Deputy 15 P1 挑战经济型游戏笔记本电脑领域的竞争。除了强劲的酷睿 7 CPU 之外,这款 15 英寸笔记本电脑还配备了GeForce RTX 5060。这款 "德国 "笔记本电脑能否在与国际竞争对手的竞争中立于不败之地?
Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.6", 2.2 kg
面向大众的平价游戏?微星 Cyborg 17 与竞争对手一较高下

面向大众的平价游戏?微星 Cyborg 17 与竞争对手一较高下

低价位市场已成为游戏笔记本电脑的必争之地,制造商们寸土必争。从纸面上看,微星 Cyborg 17 似乎是预算王冠的有力竞争者--但我们的评测显示了它在实际使用中的表现。
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 17.3", 2.6 kg
桌上的 XMG Apex 17 M25

XMG Apex 17 评测:搭载 Ryzen 9 9955HX 的 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑甚至超越了某些 RTX 5070 竞争对手

对于 Apex 17(Clevo V370FNNW-MG),XMG 坚持自己的配方:最高性能,无任何装饰。Ryzen 9 9955HX 与完全释放的 RTX 5060 相得益彰--起价 1899 欧元。但是,仅凭原始性能就能与其他 RTX 5060 机器甚至某些 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑相抗衡吗?
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 17.3", 2.8 kg
挑战联想Legion :XMG 酷睿 16 VE (M25) 游戏笔记本电脑评测

挑战联想Legion :XMG 酷睿 16 VE (M25) 游戏笔记本电脑评测

XMG Core 16 VE 不仅要与经济型游戏笔记本电脑竞争,还要与联想Legion 7 等高端机型竞争。请阅读我们的评测,看看它是否成功。
AMD Ryzen 7 255, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16", 2.1 kg
联想 ThinkBook 16p G6 评测--最佳 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑之一

联想 ThinkBook 16p G6 评测--最佳 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑之一

联想推出的 ThinkBook 16p G6 是目前市场上最好的多媒体笔记本电脑之一,与上一代产品相比有了显著改进。它采用 240 Hz 雾面面板,配备强大的 HX 处理器和移动 RTX 5060,整体性能非常出色。
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16", 2.1 kg

Tulpar T6 V3.5: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5060 的经济型游戏笔记本电脑:Tulpar T6 V3.5 评测

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » 最佳经济型游戏玩家?惠普 Omen 16 笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » 联想Legion 7 16IAX10 评测:强大的 Razer Blade 16 竞争对手

Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25): AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.30", 1.9 kg
  Review » Legion 5 的德国竞争对手:XMG 酷睿 15(M25)游戏笔记本电脑评测

Alienware 16 Aurora: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » Alienware 16 Aurora 评测:经济实惠的 1080p 超高清游戏入门笔记本电脑

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16IAH G10 灵光版评测:出色的多媒体笔记本电脑,1,100 尼特 OLED 给人留下深刻印象

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » 联想LOQ 15笔记本电脑评测:移动 RTX 5060 首次亮相

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  Review » 2025 年最佳主流游戏玩家 - 联想Legion 5 15 笔记本电脑评测

MSI Stealth A16 5060 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00"
  Review » NvidiaGeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑性能预览--几乎达到 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的水平

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403: AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403

Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » 宏碁 Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761: Intel Core 7 250H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405

HP Victus 15-fb3000ng: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fb3000ng

MSI Katana 15 HX B14WFK: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 15 HX B14WFK

Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-61: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-61

Alienware 16 Aurora: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Aurora

Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10, i7-14700HX: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10, i7-14700HX

Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71, RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.50", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71, RTX 5060

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71, RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71, RTX 5060

Dell 16 Premium, RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium, RTX 5060

Gigabyte Gaming A16 3VH: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A16 3VH

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 IAX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 IAX

Acer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-61: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-61

HP Victus 15-fa2000ng: Intel Core i7-13620H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa2000ng

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UM: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UM

Lenovo Legion Y7000 2025: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.30", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Y7000 2025

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-ap0091ng

HP Omen 16-ap0000ng: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-ap0000ng

Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42, RTX 5060: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42, RTX 5060

Alienware 16 Aurora, RTX 5060 : Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Aurora, RTX 5060

Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UM: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UM

Gigabyte Gaming A16 CVH: Intel Core i7-13620H, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A16 CVH

HP Victus 15-fa2000na: Intel Core 7 240H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa2000na

Asus Zephyrus G16 GA605KM: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G16 GA605KM

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ADR10: AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » 联想Legion Pro 5 16ADR10

Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52: Intel Core i7-13620H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52

Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10, RTX 5060: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10, RTX 5060

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » 联想 LOQ 15AHP10

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-14700HX RTX 5060: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » 联想Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-14700HX RTX 5060

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403UM: AMD Ryzen 9 270, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403UM

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H

Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-13650HX RTX 5060: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-13650HX RTX 5060

Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JMR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JMR

Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10: Intel Core i5-13450HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10

MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWFKG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWFKG

Asus V16 V3607VM: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus V16 V3607VM

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM, R7 260: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM, R7 260

Gigabyte Aero X16 1VH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 1VH

Monster Tulpar T7 V26.2.5: Intel Core i7-13620H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Monster Tulpar T7 V26.2.5

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615JMR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615JMR

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10

Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM

Alienware 16X Aurora: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16X Aurora

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LM: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LM

Schenker XMG Apex 17 M25: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
   » 内容创作者的隐藏精品?XMG Apex 17 的 QHD 显示屏经过校准后色彩极为准确

   » 在娱乐模式下,RTX 5060 笔记本电脑的运行噪音降低了 60%,性能损失仅为 12%:XMG Apex 17 测试

   » XMG Apex 17 价格大幅上涨:最快的 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑现在起价超过 2000 欧元

   » 游戏笔记本电脑的 CPU 之王:搭载 Ryzen 9 9955HX 的 XMG Apex 17 战胜所有 RTX 5060 和 RTX 5070 竞争对手

   » RTX 5060 战胜 RTX 5070:XMG Apex 17 的游戏性能出乎意料地强劲,令人惊喜

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » 联想 ThinkBook 16p G6 是一款出色的多媒体笔记本电脑

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » 今年预兆玩家的重大变化--惠普预兆 16 评测

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2 kg
   » 联想Legion 7i 16 Gen 10 超越了大多数配备类似 RTX 5060 显卡的其他超薄笔记本电脑

   » 联想推出Legion 笔记本电脑,重量甚至比雷蛇刀锋 16 或微星隐形 16 AI 还轻

Alienware 16 Aurora: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » 与 16X Aurora 相比,Alienware 16 Aurora 有一个隐藏的缺点

   » Alienware 16 Aurora 实际上比价格更高的 16X Aurora 更时尚、更耐用

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
   » 不一定非得是 Pro:联想Legion 5 15 几乎满足游戏玩家的一切需求

   » 联想推出配备最佳 OLED 面板之一的Legion 5 15

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » 预兆 16》:经济实惠的游戏机,控制中心广告满天飞

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P500 *
Vega 10
Vega 9
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)