Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 是一款用于笔记本电脑的 Blackwell 系列移动显卡,Team Green 于 2025 年 4 月推出,并于 5 月上市。它基于 GB206 芯片,提供 3328 个着色器/CUDA 内核、104 个张量内核和 26 个光线追踪单元。8 GB GDDR7 显存通过 128 位内存总线连接。GPU 的其他功能还包括原生 PCIe 5 支持、DisplayPort 2.1a、DirectX 12_2 Ultimate 以及 DLSS4 和 Reflex 2 支持。

性能

一如既往,性能取决于 RTX 5060 Laptop 的散热和最大功耗(TGP)。在合成基准测试中,新显卡仅领先于旧显卡 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU在合成基准测试中。不过,在我们的游戏测试中,移动 RTX 4070 仍然略胜一筹。因此,建议在要求苛刻的游戏(如《F1 25》)中以最高设置和 DLSS 或略微降低的细节级别进行 QHD 游戏。

功耗

该芯片的 TGP 可配置为 45 瓦至 100 瓦,并可相应地采用不同的时钟频率。例如,在 45 瓦 TGP 的情况下,GP 的时钟频率为 952 - 1455 MHz,在 100 瓦的情况下,时钟频率为 1950 - 2310 MHz。

该芯片采用台积电 5 纳米工艺(4N FinFET)生产。

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 2.24 - 2.52 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X4
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines3328 - unified
TMUs104
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores26
Tensor / AI Cores104
Core Speed952 - 1455 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance9.684 TFLOPS FP16, 9.684 TFLOPS FP32
CacheL1: 3.3 MB, L2: 32 MB
Memory Speed24000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth384 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption100 Watt (45 - 100 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count21.9 Billion
Die Size 181 mm²
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 2.1a
FeaturesDLSS4, Reflex 2, CUDA 12.8
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
PredecessorNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
11.8 pt (35%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 10688     avg: 11664     median: 11854 (32%)     max: 12756 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 10262     avg: 11575     median: 11905 (24%)     max: 12306 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -99%
...
10046 -13%
10206 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
10301 -11%
10455 -10%
10478 -9%
10681 -8%
10783 -7%
11014 -5%
11067 -4%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
11575
11609 0%
11837 2%
11850 2%
12640 9%
12806 11%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
13264 15%
15184 31%
16308 41%
16838 45%
...
19434 68%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
46337 300%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
53299 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
153691 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 24120     avg: 27027     median: 27471.5 (41%)     max: 29189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 29011     avg: 31256     median: 31492.5 (29%)     max: 33193 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
258515 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
22281 Points (26%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 31563     avg: 33306     median: 33324 (40%)     max: 35012 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 36253     avg: 39628     median: 40384.5 (31%)     max: 41490 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
81794 Points (24%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
84501 Points (46%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
54494 Points (71%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 38     avg: 39.5     median: 39 (6%)     max: 42 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 21     avg: 22     median: 21.5 (8%)     max: 24 Seconds
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
14418 points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100.6 fps (33%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 188.3     avg: 222.1     median: 217.5 (13%)     max: 265 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
122.5 fps (46%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
277.7 fps (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
648 fps (48%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 37.8     avg: 222.6     median: 315 (8%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 104228     avg: 104757     median: 104679 (27%)     max: 105441 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 15405     avg: 26495     median: 30488 (8%)     max: 33592 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
6266 Samples/s (23%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
12980 Samples/s (23%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
24812 points (21%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.5     avg: 108.9     median: 117.7 (16%)     max: 138.8 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 123     avg: 149     median: 155.1 (43%)     max: 162.6 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 120.6     avg: 148.1     median: 153.4 (19%)     max: 165 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4978     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.529 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Borderlands 4

Borderlands 4

2025
low 1920x1080
42.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
21.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
184.4 210 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
152 177.1 190.4 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
146 152.7 165.5 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 21.8 24 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.3 11.7 13 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
18.3 21 21.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
46.3
46.3
med. 1920x1080
63.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
57.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
55.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
66.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
48.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
50 57 61 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 53 56 58 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45 46 46 49 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31 33 35 36 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25 26 28 29 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
24 33 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
163.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
148.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
96  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
49.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
17.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
102.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
85.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
61.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
45.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
57.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
102.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.9 68.1 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.1 15.6 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
9.4 10.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
5.3  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
54.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
48.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
83.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
46.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
65.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
55.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
46.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
43.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
38.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
38.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 31 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
29
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
181.2 243 255 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
176.8 219 231 254 ~ 220 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
154.3 195 206 214 ~ 192 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.1 68.6 70.9 71 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.8 39 42.6 44.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.7  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
9.2  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
46 65 66.5 70.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
55.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
44  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
78.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
46.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
93.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
48.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
66.2 72.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.1 67.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.6 61.7 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31.2 39.7 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
24.3
low 1920x1080
123.9 133.6 142.3 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104.3 110.6 112 117.8 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86.7 92.5 95.6 100.6 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75 80.1 83.2 88.6 89.9 90.8 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.1 48.5 54.1 55.4 55.5 57.9 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.5  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.9 63.9 67.7 71.7 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
32.5
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
2.7
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
80
82.5
77.5
72.9
low 1920x1080
135.9 151.1 158.5 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117 121.3 124.3 128.5 ~ 123 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
105.7 106 106.7 113 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
78.7 96.8 101 105.3 105.5 110.7 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58.4 67.9 70.2 71.8 72.1 76.7 ~ 70 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.8  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
56.5  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
101.3 105.9 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
356 401 515 ~ 424 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
260 286 312 319 ~ 294 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
219 248 253 269 ~ 247 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
191.1 219 223 235 ~ 217 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
133.7 152 157.8 159.6 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
72.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
99.8 122.6 125.4 137.9 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87 105.2 108.3 118.4 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.1 91.9 92.4 93.6 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
62.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
212 215 221 ~ 216 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
142 153.9 164.6 167.6 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
109.5 118.1 121.1 126 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
79.1 87 89.8 92.2 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
142.6 162 172.8 195.1 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.3 147.8 156.4 178.3 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
125.7 141.8 150.9 171.9 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
121.5 134.7 142.3 156.1 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
105.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
186.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
171.7 186.2 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
160.3 177.3 179.7 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
108.7 120 120.1 128.5 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
96.7 100.9 106.4 107 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
90.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
47.9
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
185.5
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
187.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Borderlands 442.834.728.721.211.5
F1 251971731552111
Doom: The Dark Ages63.257.857.335
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered66.948.226.512.7
Assassin's Creed Shadows565447342714
Civilization 7163.1148.696
Monster Hunter Wilds49.445.233.517.810.6
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2102.885.961.145.6
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle102.16215105.3
Stalker 254.348.54231.8
Call of Duty Black Ops 6144131938464
Until Dawn83.865.949.335.2
Space Marine 26665.765.255.6
Star Wars Outlaws46.543.638.127.6
Black Myth: Wukong83634829219
F1 24226220192643910.7
Senua's Saga Hellblade 255.840.829
Ghost of Tsushima78.773.15946.3
Horizon Forbidden West93.858.852.948.1
Alan Wake 26963583512.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty13311194855321.5
Baldur's Gate 31491231081007034.8
Strange Brigade42429424721715172.8
X-Plane 11.111211058862.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark2161571198745
Dota 2 Reborn168153148139105.2
GTA V186.817917211910390.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
3
10

6
11
9
1
9
10
6
5
8
7
2
9
10
5
1
7
2
4

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 13. 16:30:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Sep 2025 16:16:11 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.032s ... 0.033s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.036s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.036s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12924 +0.029s ... 0.065s

#13 got single benchmarks 12924 +0.04s ... 0.104s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.104s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.722s ... 0.827s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.827s

#17 Got 295 rows for game benchmarks. +0.12s ... 0.947s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.947s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.023s ... 0.97s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.258s ... 1.228s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.231s

#22 return log +0s ... 1.231s

Notebook reviews with Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop graphics card

Alienware 16 Aurora 评测:经济实惠的 1080p 超高清游戏入门笔记本电脑

Alienware 16 Aurora 评测:经济实惠的 1080p 超高清游戏入门笔记本电脑

用户只需支付 1100 美元,就能获得 120 Hz IPS 显示屏、全 sRGB 色彩和可观的GeForce RTX 5060 GPU。不过,有一个具体的缺点可能会让一些主流或竞技游戏玩家望而却步。...
Intel Core 7 240H | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.6 kg
联想 Yoga Pro 9i G10 灵光版评测

联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16IAH G10 灵光版评测:出色的多媒体笔记本电脑,1,100 尼特 OLED 给人留下深刻印象

联想 Yoga Pro 9i Aura Edition 是一款高品质的多媒体笔记本电脑,即使是基本版本,其良好的性能和市场上最好的 OLED 屏幕也给人留下了深刻印象。舒适的输入设备和出色的音响系统让体验更加完美。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
联想LOQ 15笔记本电脑评测:移动 RTX 5060 首次亮相

联想LOQ 15笔记本电脑评测:移动 RTX 5060 首次亮相

在高端市场(RTX 5090、RTX 5080)和中高端市场(RTX 5070 [Ti])受到关注之后,现在是时候让 Nvidia 来关注中低端市场了。联想 LOQ 15 是我们能够测试的首批采用 RTX 5060 的笔记本电脑之一。...
AMD Ryzen 7 250 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | 15.60" | 2.4 kg
2025 年最佳主流游戏玩家 - 联想Legion 5 15 笔记本电脑评测

2025 年最佳主流游戏玩家 - 联想Legion 5 15 笔记本电脑评测

联想为其主流游戏玩家配备了GeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑以及 165 Hz OLED 面板,画质出色。不过,处理器是 AMD Zen 4 芯片,是否会影响游戏性能?...
AMD Ryzen 7 260 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | 15.10" | 1.9 kg
NvidiaGeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑性能预览--几乎达到 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的水平

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑性能预览--几乎达到 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的水平

在 Computex 上,我们有幸在微星 Stealth A16 的工程样品中测试了新的 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑 GPU。与预期相反,其性能出人意料地好,与 RTX 5070 笔记本 GPU 相差无几。 ...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | 16.00"

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403UM: AMD Ryzen 9 270, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403UM

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H

Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-13650HX RTX 5060: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-13650HX RTX 5060

Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JMR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JMR

Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10: Intel Core i5-13450HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10

MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWFKG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWFKG

Asus V16 V3607VM: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus V16 V3607VM

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM, R7 260: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM, R7 260

Gigabyte Aero X16 1VH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 1VH

Monster Tulpar T7 V26.2.5: Intel Core i7-13620H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Monster Tulpar T7 V26.2.5

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615JMR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615JMR

Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM

Alienware 16X Aurora: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16X Aurora

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LM: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LM

Alienware 16 Aurora: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » 与 16X Aurora 相比,Alienware 16 Aurora 有一个隐藏的缺点

   » Alienware 16 Aurora 实际上比价格更高的 16X Aurora 更时尚、更耐用

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
   » 不一定非得是 Pro:联想Legion 5 15 几乎满足游戏玩家的一切需求

   » 联想推出配备最佳 OLED 面板之一的Legion 5 15

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Radeon 8040S *
Arc 140T *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Arc 130T *

Class 3

GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-07-29)