Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 是一款用于笔记本电脑的 Blackwell 系列移动显卡,Team Green 于 2025 年 4 月推出,并于 5 月上市。它基于 GB206 芯片,提供 3328 个着色器/CUDA 内核、104 个张量内核和 26 个光线追踪单元。8 GB GDDR7 显存通过 128 位内存总线连接。GPU 的其他功能还包括原生 PCIe 5 支持、DisplayPort 2.1a、DirectX 12_2 Ultimate 以及 DLSS4 和 Reflex 2 支持。

性能

一如既往,性能取决于 RTX 5060 Laptop 的散热和最大功耗(TGP)。在合成基准测试中,新显卡仅领先于旧显卡 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU在合成基准测试中。不过,在我们的游戏测试中,移动 RTX 4070 仍然略胜一筹。因此,建议在要求苛刻的游戏(如《F1 25》)中以最高设置和 DLSS 或略微降低的细节级别进行 QHD 游戏。

功耗

该芯片的 TGP 可配置为 45 瓦至 100 瓦,并可相应地采用不同的时钟频率。例如,在 45 瓦 TGP 的情况下,GP 的时钟频率为 952 - 1455 MHz,在 100 瓦的情况下,时钟频率为 1950 - 2310 MHz。

该芯片采用台积电 5 纳米工艺(4N FinFET)生产。

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X4
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines3328 - unified
TMUs104
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores26
Tensor / AI Cores104
Core Speed952 - 1455 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance9.684 TFLOPS FP16, 9.684 TFLOPS FP32
AI GPU572 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 3.3 MB, L2: 32 MB
Memory Speed24000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth384 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption100 Watt (45 - 100 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count21.9 Billion
Die Size 181 mm²
Man. Technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 2.1a
FeaturesDLSS4, Reflex 2, CUDA 12.8
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
PredecessorGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
14.1 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 2892     avg: 2927     median: 2904 (20%)     max: 2985 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 2399     avg: 2606     median: 2604 (18%)     max: 2806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 11026     avg: 11792     median: 11804 (27%)     max: 12307 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
22281 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
55806 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 21242     avg: 27786     median: 28231 (43%)     max: 31650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 26022     avg: 31317     median: 32031 (29%)     max: 34197 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
258515 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 9228     avg: 11782     median: 11816.5 (31%)     max: 12847 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 9090     avg: 11718     median: 12052 (25%)     max: 12719 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -99%
...
10206 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
10301 -12%
10455 -11%
10478 -11%
10681 -9%
10783 -8%
10948 -7%
11067 -6%
11609 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
11718
11837 1%
11850 1%
12640 8%
12806 9%
13261 13%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
14875 27%
15184 30%
16308 39%
16556 41%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 99%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44063 276%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 47731     avg: 59283     median: 59736.5 (56%)     max: 70684 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 86886     avg: 140538     median: 145462 (36%)     max: 168524 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 26544     avg: 33099     median: 33268 (40%)     max: 36789 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 31549     avg: 39199     median: 39428 (30%)     max: 42567 Points
171.8 -100%
...
35743 -9%
35944 -8%
36101 -8%
36164 -8%
AMD Radeon 8050S
36323 -7%
37375 -5%
37918 -3%
38052 -3%
38259 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
39199
39402 1%
40391 3%
40462 3%
41630 6%
42016 7%
43219 10%
44148 13%
44268 13%
46877 20%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 74%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 231%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
81794 Points (24%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
84501 Points (46%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
54494 Points (71%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 38     avg: 47.8     median: 40 (6%)     max: 186 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 20     avg: 22.3     median: 21 (8%)     max: 28 Seconds
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
14418 points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100.6 fps (10%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 113.5     avg: 238     median: 243 (14%)     max: 350 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
122.5 fps (46%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
277.7 fps (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
648 fps (48%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 174     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
min: 104228     avg: 110049     median: 109902 (28%)     max: 116422 points
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
min: 29481     avg: 84013     median: 100097 (25%)     max: 108528 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
6266 Samples/s (23%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
12980 Samples/s (23%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
24812 points (21%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.5     avg: 140     median: 139.8 (19%)     max: 183 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125130135140145150155160165170175180185190195200205210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 109.7     avg: 165.3     median: 161.9 (45%)     max: 220 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.4     avg: 167.6     median: 164.8 (21%)     max: 212 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125130135140145150155160165170175180185190195200205210215Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3673     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.576 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced

Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced

2026
low 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
48  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
69.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
62.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57.7 60.2 62.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55.2 57.3 60.4 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
36.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
48.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Pragmata

Pragmata

2026
low 1920x1080
144.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
102.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
80.6 83 83.1 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
31.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
48.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
79.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Quality Preset + DLSS Balanced + Path Tracing 1920x1080
57.7
low 1920x1080
78.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
61.6 62.3 64.5 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
47.2 48.3 51.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
36.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
51.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
116.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60 62.8 67.3 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.9 55.1 55.9 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
33.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
51.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
147.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
101.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
90.4 92.6 94.1 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.4 46.7 47.7 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
2.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Max Settings + Path Tracing + DLSS Balanced 1920x1080
31.3
low 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
127 130 130 138 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95 95 96 103 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32 36 36 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
37  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
69 73.8 80.7 91.3 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50 55.4 59.4 67 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.1 28.4 30.5 33.9 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
102 110.1 118.4 136.7 ~ 117 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
79.9 88.6 93.5 104.9 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55 59.8 61.9 70.2 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
47.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
71.5 82.1 83.4 91.7 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.3 65 66.3 72.7 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.1 35.7 37.1 40.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
26.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
47.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
42.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34.7 40.3 41.2 48.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.7 31.6 34.1 39.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.3 20.5 21.2 24.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
21.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
176.8 184.4 189.8 207 210 263 ~ 205 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
152 174.9 177.1 180.2 180.8 190.4 217 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144.2 146 152.7 154 160.9 165.5 174.4 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 21.8 23.9 24 25 25.8 26.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.3 9.8 11.7 12.6 13 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
18.3 21 21.9 25.3 26.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
46.3
46.3
50
48.9
53.7
48.1
low 1920x1080
58.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.6 52.6 63.2 64.4 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
44.1 48.6 57.5 57.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.8 47.1 56.4 57.3 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.4 35 38.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.7  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
22.7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
48 52.8 55.1 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
48.2 61 66.9 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.7 48.2 54.9 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.8 26.5 29.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
12.7 13.8 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
25.3 30 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
57 60 61 66 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53 56 56 58 61 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46 46 48 49 53 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33 34 35 36 40 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25 28 28 29 34 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
33 41 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
55
med. 1920x1080
163.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
148.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
96  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
74.2 80.1 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.8 63 68.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.7 58.8 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6 34.8 36.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.9 20.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
25.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
77.6 102.8 106.3 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64.9 85.9 86 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.1 60.4 61.1 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
43.6 45.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
57.4 57.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
127.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.8 68.1 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.3 15.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
4.2 9.4 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
54.3 58.8 63.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
48.5 52.3 56.3 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.1 42 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.8 32.4 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.8 70.1 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
83.8 84.9 88.6 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62 62.5 65.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
45.4 47.9 49.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.2 35.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
43.5 46.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
66 78.7 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65.7 77.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
65.2 76.7 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
54 55.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.8 70.3 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
46.5 51.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
43.6 46.8 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
37.8 38.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
27.2 27.6 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
37.9 38.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
85 100 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64 73 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50 58 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 31 32 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21 22 23 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
32 36 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
31
29
37
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
243 249 255 273 284 ~ 261 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
219 223 231 249 254 257 268 275 ~ 247 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
195 203 206 207 208 214 219 230 ~ 210 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.2 68.6 69.5 70.9 71 71.6 74.3 77.5 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39 42.6 42.8 43.6 44.5 45.7 47.2 49.1 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
65 66.5 68.3 69.3 70.4 71.4 74.5 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
53.7 55.8 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.6 40.8 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28.4 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
42.8 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
78.7 87.1 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.1 76.7 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59 60.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
46.1 46.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
60.2 61.9 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
78.3 93.8 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.8 60.6 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.9 60 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
47 48.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.9 60.6 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
72.6 79 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.4 71.6 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.7 66.6 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36.7 39.7 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
30.5
24.3
low 1920x1080
121.1 128.9 129.3 129.8 132.3 133.6 141.8 142.3 146.9 153.3 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92.4 107.1 107.3 107.4 107.6 108.2 109.2 110.6 110.6 112 116.1 117.2 117.8 118.1 124.5 125.1 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.9 90.5 92.3 92.5 93.2 93.4 93.5 93.9 95.3 95.6 95.7 98.5 100.3 100.6 100.6 100.8 104 104.4 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.1 75 81.8 82.2 83.2 83.3 83.3 84.3 85 85.8 86.6 87.2 88.5 88.6 89.9 90 90.5 90.8 91.2 94.9 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.1 51.5 53.4 53.5 54.1 55.4 55.5 56.1 56.2 57 57.1 57.9 58.8 59.2 59.8 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.1  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
32.7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61.4 63.2 63.9 65.2 66.7 67.7 69.6 70 71.7 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
178.9
151.8
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
39.8
32.5
37.1
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
2.7
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
80
82.5
77.5
82
72.9
75.6
78.1
55.8
78.8
81.1
75.9
85.6
62.4
75.2
82.1
73.9
74.6
80.7
82.8
low 1920x1080
150.5 151.1 155.8 158.5 162 164.6 166.1 170 173.3 ~ 161 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
95 96.2 114.2 115.7 119.2 120.4 121.3 124.3 125.2 128.5 132 133 134.9 137.8 144.6 ~ 123 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
81.1 93 94.1 95.4 97.5 105.5 105.7 106.7 110.4 112.8 113 115 117 118 119.9 ~ 106 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
78.1 78.7 90 90.7 93.3 95.6 96.8 101 103 105.5 109.1 110.7 111.2 112.2 112.5 113.4 115.6 117.8 118.6 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58.4 62.6 67.9 70.1 71.8 72.1 75.5 76.4 76.7 78 78.1 78.4 78.9 79.4 82.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
38.8  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
63.8 65.8 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
105.9 114.1 114.3 117.5 119.1 ~ 114 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
213.3
242
208
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
401 436 482 492 494 515 601 610 648 ~ 520 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
286 288 296 303 312 314 319 321 343 344 348 ~ 316 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
214 227 237 238 248 253 264 269 273 275 279 ~ 252 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
195 199 217 217.8 219 223 223 231 235 239 240 ~ 222 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
125.5 142.7 152 155.2 155.7 157.8 159.6 162 164.3 165 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
83 86.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
99.8 105.8 107.1 107.5 113 117.9 122.6 135 135.6 137.9 138.1 142.5 164.2 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79.8 87 95.6 97.7 98.3 98.8 102.9 108.3 108.9 110.4 112.2 118.3 118.4 120.8 126.8 142.9 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.2 70.2 72.1 78 78.4 79.6 79.6 83.4 91.9 92.4 93 93.9 97.3 98.6 102.8 105.6 118.4 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
99.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
187.9 197.3 204 215 217 221 227 228 232 ~ 214 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125.7 143.7 143.9 153.9 155.3 162.6 164.6 167.4 167.6 170.4 177.6 178.6 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107 110 111 113.3 118.1 119.5 121.1 121.7 124.1 126 130.4 133.6 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
82.6 87 88.2 88.2 89.2 89.8 89.9 92.2 92.3 94 95.8 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
50.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
142.6 162 172.5 172.8 179.6 182 183.5 184.5 190.6 206 215 221 268 ~ 191 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.3 133.9 136.3 145.2 147.8 156.4 156.7 163.4 164.2 164.3 167.4 168.2 182.1 187.6 190.7 232 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
115 118.7 125.7 129.7 140.7 141.7 141.8 150.9 151.6 152.1 154.4 156.5 161.7 163.6 176.6 184.2 185 223 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
111.5 115 120.4 121.5 133.2 134.7 139.4 142.3 142.4 144.6 145.3 147.8 150.6 152.9 161.6 163.7 170.9 201 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
124.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
183.6 184.1 185.8 187.9 ~ 185 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
171.7 176.9 178.4 178.9 181.1 183.5 183.8 184.7 187.8 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
160.3 160.3 170.1 176.1 176.3 177.3 179.4 179.6 181.9 185.7 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103.5 108.7 120.1 120.6 123.8 127.5 128.5 128.5 129.7 133.5 133.6 133.8 142.9 146.3 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
100.9 105.4 106.4 107 108.1 110.7 114.3 115.2 116 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
106  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
47.9
53.9
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
184.6
185.5
180.1
187.9
181.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
187.7
187.2
184.7
187.8
186.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced826559382813
007 First Light69.662.6605836.616
Pragmata144.3102.38259.231.3
Death Stranding 278.668.9634937.122.3
Crimson Desert116.768.963544223.2
Resident Evil Requiem147.8101.3924619.62.84
Call of Duty Black Ops 7145131973621
Anno 117: Pax Romana79582923.4
ARC Raiders117926247.8
The Outer Worlds 282663626.7
Battlefield 670.136
Borderlands 442.841332111.5
F1 252051821572411
Doom: The Dark Ages58.55752513511.7
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered59492613
Assassin's Creed Shadows6157483629
Civilization 7163.1148.696
Monster Hunter Wilds7762542917
Kingdom Come Deliverance 296795645
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle127.760117
Stalker 259524232
Call of Duty Black Ops 6144131938464
Until Dawn86634834
Space Marine 272727155
Star Wars Outlaws49453827
Black Myth: Wukong9369543022
F1 242612472107144
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2554029
Ghost of Tsushima83756046
Horizon Forbidden West86605648
Alan Wake 276706438
Cyberpunk 207713611296865625.1
Baldur's Gate 31611231061037438.8
Strange Brigade52031625222215485
X-Plane 11.111251088899.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark2141591209050.7
Dota 2 Reborn191164154144124.4
GTA V185181175127109106
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
8
14

7
19
10

11
19
7
6
15
8
3
14
16
5
1
7
3
3
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $1,323.97
    ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Gaming Laptop, 16” FHD+ 16:10 165Hz/3ms, NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 5060, Intel® Core™ i7 Processor 14650HX, 16GB DDR5, 1TB Gen 4 SSD, Wi-Fi 7, Windows 11 Home, G615JMR-AS74
  • $1,199.99
    Lenovo LOQ 15.6" IPS FHD 144Hz AMD Ryzen 7 250 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 AI Gaming Laptop 16GB RAM 512GB Luna Grey
  • $1,048.89
    GIGABYTE - Gaming A16 Gaming Laptop - 165Hz 1920x1200 WUXGA - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 - Intel i7-13620H - 1TB SSD with 16GB DDR5 RAM - Windows 11 Home AD Gaming A16 CVHI3US894SH
  • $1,749.00
    Lenovo Legion 5 16" WQXGA 240Hz Gaming Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 8GB GDDR7; 32GB DDR5 RAM; 1TB NVMe M.2 SSD; Gigabit LAN, 2x2 WiFi 7
  • $939.99
    msi Cyborg 17 17.3" FHD IPS-Level, 144Hz Gaming Laptop, Intel Core 5-210H Processor, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, NVIDIA RTX 5060 Graphics (8GB GDDR7), Wi-Fi 6E, BT 5.3 CYBORG17B2039

v1.35
log 27. 16:03:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:48:24 +0200 +0.004s ... 0.004s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.02s ... 0.024s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.026s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.026s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12924 +0.039s ... 0.065s

#13 got single benchmarks 12924 +0.1s ... 0.166s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.166s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +1.763s ... 1.929s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.929s

#17 Got 845 rows for game benchmarks. +0.278s ... 2.207s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.207s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.024s ... 2.23s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.686s ... 2.917s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.402s ... 3.319s

#22 return log +0s ... 3.319s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop graphics card

是过度设计还是别出心裁?华硕 TUF Gaming A18 评测

是过度设计还是别出心裁?华硕 TUF Gaming A18 评测

华硕推出的TUF Gaming A18是一款价格相对亲民的XXL笔记本电脑,其宽阔的显示屏不仅适合观看电影,也非常适合游戏。我们测试了一款搭载Ryzen 7 260和GeForce RTX 5060的配置,并将其与最新的18英寸竞品进行了对比。
AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 18", 2.7 kg
配备 OLED 屏幕、AMD 显卡和 32 GB 内存的游戏本:联想 Legion 5 15AGP11 笔记本评测

配备 OLED 屏幕、AMD 显卡和 32 GB 内存的游戏本:联想 Legion 5 15AGP11 笔记本评测

联想Legion品牌旗下涵盖高端至中端游戏笔记本电脑。联想Legion 5 15AGP11属于中端机型,虽然在某些方面有所妥协,但仍配备了高品质组件,例如OLED屏幕。得益于AMD锐龙处理器与Nvidia GeForce显卡的组合,这款笔记本在我们的评测中表现强劲。
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.3", 1.9 kg
是视觉污染还是吸睛之作?联想 LOQ 15 游戏本评测

是视觉污染还是吸睛之作?联想 LOQ 15 游戏本评测

大多数笔记本电脑都淹没在司空见惯的灰黑色的产品大军中,但这款联想 LOQ 15AHP11 鲜艳的“Surge Green”配色版本却拒绝随波逐流。我们的评测将揭晓这款 15 英寸游戏本是否拥有与引人注目的外观相匹配的强劲性能。
AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.3", 2.2 kg
配备 1100 尼特 OLED 的 15 英寸优秀多媒体笔记本电脑 - 联想 Yoga Pro 7i 灵光版评测

配备 1100 尼特 OLED 的 15 英寸优秀多媒体笔记本电脑 - 联想 Yoga Pro 7i 灵光版评测

联想是少数拥有 15 英寸设备的制造商之一,新推出的 Yoga Pro 7i 15 Aura Edition 是一款令人印象深刻的多媒体笔记本电脑,起价 2679 美元,配备英特尔 Panther Lake CPU、GeForce RTX 5060 GPU、32 GB 内存和绚丽的 165 Hz OLED 触摸屏。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.3", 1.7 kg
联想 Pro 9i 16 G11 灵光版评测:戴尔 XPS 16 的直接竞争对手

联想 Pro 9i 16 G11 灵光版评测:戴尔 XPS 16 的直接竞争对手

除去 "Yoga "这个名字,新的 Pro 9i 16 G11 瞄准了 XPS 16,集成了更多的端口、更亮的触摸屏和真正的 Nvidia 独立显卡。性能猎手和内容创作者应该考虑联想的这款最新多媒体机型。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16", 1.9 kg

Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 联想Legion 7a 16 G11 评测 - 配备 AMD Ryzen 400 的轻型 OLED 游戏笔记本电脑

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761: Intel Core 7 250H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 评测:德国经济型游戏笔记本电脑能否与大型厂商一较高下?

MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG: Intel Core i7-13620H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  Review » 面向大众的平价游戏?微星 Cyborg 17 与竞争对手一较高下

Schenker XMG Apex 17 M25: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  Review » XMG Apex 17 评测:搭载 Ryzen 9 9955HX 的 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑甚至超越了某些 RTX 5070 竞争对手

Schenker XMG Core 16 VE M25: AMD Ryzen 7 255, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 挑战联想Legion :XMG 酷睿 16 VE (M25) 游戏笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkBook 16p G6 评测--最佳 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑之一

Tulpar T6 V3.5: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5060 的经济型游戏笔记本电脑:Tulpar T6 V3.5 评测

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » 最佳经济型游戏玩家?惠普 Omen 16 笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » 联想Legion 7 16IAX10 评测:强大的 Razer Blade 16 竞争对手

Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25): AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.30", 1.9 kg
  Review » Legion 5 的德国竞争对手:XMG 酷睿 15(M25)游戏笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16IAH G10 灵光版评测:出色的多媒体笔记本电脑,1,100 尼特 OLED 给人留下深刻印象

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » 联想LOQ 15笔记本电脑评测:移动 RTX 5060 首次亮相

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  Review » 2025 年最佳主流游戏玩家 - 联想Legion 5 15 笔记本电脑评测

MSI Stealth A16 5060 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00"
  Review » NvidiaGeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑性能预览--几乎达到 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的水平

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-I51: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-I51 - 评测与配置

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 11: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16i Gen 11 - 评测与配置

Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 - 评测与配置

MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG: Intel Core i7-13620H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG - 评测与配置

Gigabyte Gaming A18: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A18

MSI Stealth 16 AI+ B3WF: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » 微星 Stealth 16 AI+ B3WF

Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » 联想 Pro 9 16IPH11

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 15.30", 1.7 kg
  External Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11

Lenovo Legion 5i 15IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 15.30", 1.9 kg
  External Review » 联想 Legion 5i 15IPH11

Lenovo Legion 7a 16AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » 联想Legion 7a 16AGP11

Lenovo Legion 5a 15AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, 15.30", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5a 15AGP11

MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWFKG: Intel Core 7 240H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWFKG

HP Omen 16-am0000ng: Intel Core i9-14900HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-am0000ng

Acer Swift X 14 AI SFX14-61G, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X 14 AI SFX14-61G, Ryzen AI 7 350

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401GM: AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401GM

Acer Swift X 14 OLED SFX14-73G: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X 14 OLED SFX14-73G

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00"
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403: AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403

Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » 宏碁 Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761: Intel Core 7 250H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405

HP Victus 15-fb3000ng: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fb3000ng

MSI Katana 15 HX B14WFK: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 15 HX B14WFK

Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-61: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-61

Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10, i7-14700HX: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10, i7-14700HX

Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71, RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.50", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71, RTX 5060

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71, RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71, RTX 5060

Dell 16 Premium, RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium, RTX 5060

Gigabyte Gaming A16 3VH: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A16 3VH

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 IAX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 IAX

Acer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-61: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-61

HP Victus 15-fa2000ng: Intel Core i7-13620H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa2000ng

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UM: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UM

Lenovo Legion Y7000 2025: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.30", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Y7000 2025

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-ap0091ng

HP Omen 16-ap0000ng: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-ap0000ng

Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42, RTX 5060: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42, RTX 5060

Alienware 16 Aurora, RTX 5060 : Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Aurora, RTX 5060

Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UM: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UM

Gigabyte Gaming A16 CVH: Intel Core i7-13620H, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A16 CVH

HP Victus 15-fa2000na: Intel Core 7 240H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa2000na

Asus Zephyrus G16 GA605KM: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G16 GA605KM

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ADR10: AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » 联想Legion Pro 5 16ADR10

Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52: Intel Core i7-13620H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52

Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10, RTX 5060: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10, RTX 5060

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » 联想 LOQ 15AHP10

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-14700HX RTX 5060: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » 联想Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-14700HX RTX 5060

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403UM: AMD Ryzen 9 270, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403UM

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H

Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-13650HX RTX 5060: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-13650HX RTX 5060

Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JMR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JMR

Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10: Intel Core i5-13450HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10

MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWFKG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWFKG

Asus V16 V3607VM: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus V16 V3607VM

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM, R7 260: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM, R7 260

Gigabyte Aero X16 1VH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 1VH

Monster Tulpar T7 V26.2.5: Intel Core i7-13620H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Monster Tulpar T7 V26.2.5

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615JMR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615JMR

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10

Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM

Alienware 16X Aurora: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16X Aurora

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LM: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LM

Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, 15.30", 1.9 kg
   » 这款联想Legion游戏本是一款相当不错的“工作马”——只有一个例外

   » 联想Legion 5还是LOQ:哪款AMD游戏本更胜一筹?

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 15.30", 1.7 kg
   » 当Apple 的 MacBook Pro 突然成为廉价替代品时,联想 Yoga Pro 7i 15 等笔记本电脑就有了问题

   » 联想 Yoga Pro 7i 15 售价超过 2600 美元,这是新的现实吗?

   » 联想 Yoga Pro 7i 15 G11 是首批配备全新 RTX 5070 12 GB 的多媒体笔记本电脑之一

Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 联想 Pro 9 16 Aura OLED 显示屏的亮度接近 1600 nits,是用钱能买到的最亮的显示屏之一。

Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 联想Legion 7a 16 2049 美元的价格太贵了,而Legion 5 15 的游戏性能与之相当,只需 1350 美元。

Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 联想颗粒感强、分辨率低的产品页面让原本光滑的 Pro 9i 16 Aura 看起来很糟糕

   » 联想 Pro 9 16 G11 Aura 在平衡模式下运行更安静,但对图形的影响很小。

   » 在首次基准测试中,酷睿 Ultra 9 386H 的速度几乎没有超过酷睿 Ultra 9 285H

Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 联想新款Legion 7a 16 游戏笔记本电脑比以前更轻,但牺牲了性能

Schenker XMG Apex 17 M25: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
   » 内容创作者的隐藏精品?XMG Apex 17 的 QHD 显示屏经过校准后色彩极为准确

   » 在娱乐模式下,RTX 5060 笔记本电脑的运行噪音降低了 60%,性能损失仅为 12%:XMG Apex 17 测试

   » XMG Apex 17 价格大幅上涨:最快的 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑现在起价超过 2000 欧元

   » 游戏笔记本电脑的 CPU 之王:搭载 Ryzen 9 9955HX 的 XMG Apex 17 战胜所有 RTX 5060 和 RTX 5070 竞争对手

   » RTX 5060 战胜 RTX 5070:XMG Apex 17 的游戏性能出乎意料地强劲,令人惊喜

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » 联想 ThinkBook 16p G6 是一款出色的多媒体笔记本电脑

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » 今年预兆玩家的重大变化--惠普预兆 16 评测

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2 kg
   » 联想Legion 7i 16 Gen 10 超越了大多数配备类似 RTX 5060 显卡的其他超薄笔记本电脑

   » 联想推出Legion 笔记本电脑,重量甚至比雷蛇刀锋 16 或微星隐形 16 AI 还轻

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
   » 不一定非得是 Pro:联想Legion 5 15 几乎满足游戏玩家的一切需求

   » 联想推出配备最佳 OLED 面板之一的Legion 5 15

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » 预兆 16》:经济实惠的游戏机,控制中心广告满天飞

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon 540X *
Vega 10
Vega 9
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs *
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)