Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop是在 2025 年 CES 上发布的 Blackwell 系列笔记本电脑移动显卡。它基于 GB206 芯片,拥有 4608 个着色器/CUDA 内核,时钟频率为 1425 - 2347 MHz(取决于型号)。显存为 8 GB GDDR7,采用 128 位内存总线。

架构

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 笔记本电脑拥有全新的 Tensor(第五代)和 RT 内核(第四代),性能达到 798 AI TOPS。Blackwell 架构率先采用了全新的 DLSS 4 多帧生成技术,由于改进了 AI 功能,每秒可生成更多帧数,同时使用更少的内存并提供更好的图像质量。Nvidia 还设法提高了 DLSS、帧生成和光线重构功能(之前的 RTX 4000 系列也有这些功能)的性能和输出质量。此外,新型号现在还支持具有低延迟的 Reflex 2 模式和 Frame Warp。

性能

RTX 5070 Mobile 的游戏性能在很大程度上取决于笔记本电脑的散热和 TDP 设置。因此,最大时钟频率也会在 1425 到 2347 MHz 之间变化。平均而言,性能通常略高于旧版的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU但低于 RTX 3080 Ti 笔记本电脑.Blackwell 架构的一个新功能是在 DLSS4 中支持多帧生成(MFG)。这可以大幅提高帧率,但如果没有 MFG,您应该已经达到 50 帧以上,以实现可玩的延迟。

该芯片采用当前的台积电 4N 工艺制造。

 

 

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X6
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines4608 - unified
TMUs144
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores36
Tensor / AI Cores144
Core Speed907 - 2347 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance23.22 TFLOPS FP16, 23.22 TFLOPS FP32
AI GPU798 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 4.608 KB, L2: 32.768 KB
Memory Speed32000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth512 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption100 Watt (50 - 100 Watt TGP)
Man. Technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
PredecessorGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
13.5 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 2796     avg: 3364     median: 3464 (23%)     max: 3608 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 2441     avg: 2918     median: 2943.5 (20%)     max: 3195 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 11847     avg: 13499     median: 13573.5 (31%)     max: 14954 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
83764 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 22444     avg: 24029     median: 24210 (28%)     max: 24949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 55202     avg: 59766     median: 59765.5 (27%)     max: 64329 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 24366     avg: 29987     median: 30433 (46%)     max: 34042 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 28759     avg: 35220     median: 36037 (33%)     max: 38680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
614671 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 11192     avg: 13068     median: 13082 (34%)     max: 14448 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 10851     avg: 13241     median: 13561 (28%)     max: 14771 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -99%
...
10783 -19%
10946 -17%
11067 -16%
11529 -13%
11609 -12%
11837 -11%
11850 -11%
12640 -5%
12806 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
13241
15184 15%
16308 23%
16742 26%
17764 34%
19434 47%
20831 57%
20950 58%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 76%
23736 79%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 76%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 238%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
791803 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
544538 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 56625     avg: 64886     median: 65200.5 (62%)     max: 71379 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 119532     avg: 154750     median: 153667 (38%)     max: 188061 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
76809 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
167941 Points (65%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 29568     avg: 35810     median: 36494 (44%)     max: 40182 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 36721     avg: 44215     median: 44109 (34%)     max: 49568 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 29     avg: 39.6     median: 32.5 (5%)     max: 228 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 17     avg: 19.9     median: 20 (7%)     max: 24 Seconds
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 144.5     avg: 241.3     median: 231 (13%)     max: 341 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 115.1     avg: 124.2     median: 124.2 (47%)     max: 133.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 252.4     avg: 273.8     median: 273.8 (49%)     max: 295.1 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 637.4     avg: 689     median: 688.8 (51%)     max: 740.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 617.6     avg: 645     median: 645.2 (61%)     max: 672.8 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 752     median: 315 (8%)     max: 1535 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 66275     avg: 128958     median: 132963 (34%)     max: 146025 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 104858     avg: 118831     median: 119702 (30%)     max: 125787 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 104.2     avg: 145.3     median: 142.4 (19%)     max: 194.7 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
118 Watt (16%)
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (73%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 108.7     avg: 175.8     median: 173.7 (48%)     max: 233 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.9     avg: 170.4     median: 172.3 (22%)     max: 227 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.428     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (2%)     max: 0.761 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Resident Evil Requiem

Resident Evil Requiem

2026
med. 1920x1080
103.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
98.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
26.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
224  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
150 152 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117 119 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24 28 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
107.6 122.2 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
85.5 96.7 99 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.2 75.6 76.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.3 39.3 40.4 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.3 27.5 27.6 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.3  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
23.2 25.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
38.2 41.2 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
151.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
121.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
83.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
87.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
79.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
141 154 ~ 148 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
130.3 138.6 ~ 134 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
106.6 111.2 ~ 109 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
77.8 79.9 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
43.4 51.2 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
56.1 64.7 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
52.3 57.9 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.5 51.1 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.4 27.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
156.8 163.8 176.5 184.4 186.4 214 242 243 267 274 ~ 211 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
147.2 160.3 171 174.9 177.6 204 218 227 239 242 242 ~ 200 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142.5 151.5 161 170.4 170.6 172.3 177.8 191 191.9 198.4 199 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.8 26.5 26.8 26.9 27.1 27.2 27.7 27.7 31 31.2 31.6 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
7.7 9.2 10.6 11.2 14.1 14.3 15.5 17 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
3.1  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
8.3  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
27.1 27.1 29 29.1 30.9 33.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
56.9
56.1
55.4
59.8
53.6
64.5
56.6
48.7
62.3
48.5
low 1920x1080
88.4 96.2 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64.6 69.6 75 75.2 88.4 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.5 66 68.1 69 74.2 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59 64.8 66.6 67 72.2 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
39.5 44.8 45.4 46 49.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
12  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
14.2 33.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
54.6 59.9 65.4 66.1 70 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
55.6 72.8 74.2 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
47.3 62.3 65.4 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.8 30.7 32.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19.5 20.2 20.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
30.3 32 34 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
39 61 73 75 80 81 82 83 100 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36 57 68 70 71 74 76 77 77 93 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32 49 59 60 61 61 63 63 64 66 77 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25 33 38 40 43 43 43 44 45 45 46 53 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22 28 30 31 33 34 36 37 38 38 39 40 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18 22 35 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
24 29 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
25 35 37 39 45 45 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
46
44
57
33
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
28
37
med. 1920x1080
154.1 155.9 201 ~ 170 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
131.7 142.7 166.5 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
90.7 97.9 111.6 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
69.1 80.1 86.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.6 74 75.9 78.2 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.1 43.2 44.5 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1 24.3 31.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
30.4 41.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
101.7 111.5 123.7 ~ 112 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
86.1 91.4 102.6 ~ 93 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.8 67.6 75.4 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42.6 45.5 52.1 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.5 61.5 71.5 ~ 64 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
125.9 130.2 131.6 137.6 138.7 153.8 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 34.3 39.1 39.1 54.7 56.1 60 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.3 19.1 31 42.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
7.6 12.3 24 32.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
54.7 64 68.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.7 54.1 59.3 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
45.7 47.1 50.4 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
34.2 36 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
66.9 74.1 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
155  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95 98 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68 75 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
76.8 100.7 109.5 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
59.6 75.9 81.3 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.8 59 61.8 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35.4 44.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
46.7 57.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
64.7 73.1 101.8 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
61.6 70.5 99.2 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
58.9 68.1 97.3 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
54.7 70.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.5 89.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
58.6 65.4 71.8 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
53.5 58.5 62 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
47.5 49.4 50.3 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
32.4 35.1 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
48.2 48.5 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
83 106 114 197 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63 79 84 112 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49 62 65 66 86 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 36 36 37 44 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20 26 26 26 27 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
31 39 40 40 41 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
206
127
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
40
18
42
45
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
197.8 242 242 247 288 296 305 333 ~ 269 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
195.5 221 238 241 245 257 271 275 291 312 316 ~ 260 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
186 190.6 197.5 199.3 217 223 228 229 231 234 241 241 244 247 251 ~ 224 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.8 66.4 77.5 77.7 78.5 80.7 83.3 85.3 86.1 86.4 86.6 87.1 87.6 88 88.3 88.8 90.2 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40.3 42.1 48.7 49.5 51 51.1 51.9 52.6 52.7 53.4 53.5 53.8 54.7 54.8 55.2 55.3 56.9 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.5 19 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
18.9 22.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.9 67 76.1 77.2 78 79.2 81.8 81.9 82.4 84 85.4 85.8 86.7 86.7 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
64.1 70 71 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.3 51.4 53.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.7 36.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49.4 56.2 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
84.5 97.4 100 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
80.4 91 92.1 ~ 88 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
64.9 71 75.8 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
49.1 53.8 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
66.5 74.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
91.1 98.5 108.1 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
74.9 82.1 82.6 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
73.2 77.9 81 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.9 64 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
70.3 81.3 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
102.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
101.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
97.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
81.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
352  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
68.8 84.1 84.7 86.1 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.4 76.8 77.8 82.4 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60 62.6 64.6 69.1 71.3 72.5 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35.8 40.5 41 41.5 43.8 45.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.6 23.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
115.2
106.8
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
28.5
37.7
30.9
med. 1920x1080
222  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
170.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
156.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
115.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
114.1 122.5 123.4 127 128.5 130.8 134.9 137.5 140.7 140.8 148.7 149.5 150.1 157.8 164.9 168.2 169.7 171.8 174.2 180.3 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90.2 104 107.8 112.6 112.8 117.3 118.3 120.3 121.1 121.2 121.3 126.8 128.9 129 132.5 134.3 137.6 138.3 141.7 142.6 142.7 144.1 145 146.4 167 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.5 91 92.5 98 100 104.1 104.6 108 108.1 108.3 109.4 109.7 112.8 113.8 114.7 115.1 115.3 117.7 118.2 118.6 120.1 121.2 121.3 122 122.8 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.5 82.4 84.6 87.3 88.6 90.1 90.4 93.6 94.8 95.6 97.8 98.3 98.9 100 101.3 101.5 101.5 101.9 102.9 103.8 104.3 105.5 106.4 106.7 107 107.1 107.1 108.7 109.4 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51.9 56.1 57.2 57.4 58.3 58.4 59 60.8 61.3 62.8 63.4 64.5 64.6 65.1 65.2 65.4 65.9 66 66 66.3 66.8 66.9 67.4 67.8 68.2 68.3 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.4 26.7 26.9 28.4 30.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
34.8  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61.4 64.4 65 67.5 68.5 71.2 73.4 74.3 76.6 76.7 77 78.4 79.1 80.1 80.7 81 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
183.6
161
177.2
138.4
146.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
45.4
35.3
44.9
45.8
44.6
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
6.4
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
89.7
88.1
89.2
96
76.2
82.5
98.7
96.9
100.1
94.6
73.4
97.2
96.3
110.2
91.8
89.7
92.1
99.9
96.7
93.1
87.2
98.4
95
87.7
81.3
82.7
96.5
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
9.7
7.5
low 1920x1080
148.6 149.1 149.5 150.4 159.5 160 165.1 171.3 172 173.6 176.7 178.7 179.1 179.1 181.7 192.4 192.4 204 ~ 171 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
118.5 122.1 124 125.5 127.2 129.7 133 134.3 139.4 142.5 142.7 143.6 144 145 146 146.5 146.6 150.7 152 152.9 153.1 154.5 155.9 166.3 ~ 142 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
87.5 106 106.8 108 109.8 111.1 112.9 117.1 123.4 123.8 123.9 124.8 126.1 126.7 128.2 129.3 130 130.7 130.8 132.8 134.5 134.6 135.5 144.8 ~ 122 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.3 101.3 103.5 106 107.2 108 108.8 109 109.2 109.4 115.4 121 121.3 121.9 121.9 124.9 125.7 127 127.2 127.3 127.5 128.4 128.8 130.6 131 135.8 135.8 140.8 141.4 ~ 120 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
61 63.1 71.1 72.8 73.8 75.2 75.8 76.2 81.3 82.5 84.1 84.9 84.9 85.4 85.6 88.4 88.6 89 89.4 90 90.1 90.5 90.7 91.3 96.3 96.4 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
41.1 43.2 44 46 49.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
58.1 65.1 73 77.6 83.7 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
97.7 107.3 127.4 128 133.9 135.8 139.4 140 ~ 126 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
288
202
250.1
197.8
189.2
171
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
260 324 332 374 389 391 424 430 450 470 479 502 507 510 511 519 520 536 560 649 ~ 457 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
253 274 277 281 282 287 294 300 315 318 319 331 332 335 339 339 341 346 346 349 362 369 ~ 318 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
232 240 241 243 248 251 257 259 260 270 277 278 280 281 285 290 291 293 294 295 300 302 ~ 271 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
203 204 208 217 219 220 226 234 234 237 242 244 246 246 247 254 258 258 258 259 259 259 261 ~ 239 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
137 140.2 146.7 149.7 151.8 157.2 161.9 164.2 165.7 165.8 166.6 168.6 168.9 169.3 171.8 172.2 172.7 175.3 177.4 177.9 229.6 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
87.8 89.8 90.3 95.8 96.1 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
97.1 97.7 102.8 104.2 104.3 105.7 108.2 109.6 110 111.8 112.9 114.2 114.3 125.1 125.9 128.6 132.4 135.5 142.4 146.6 148.1 156 157.5 161.3 162.3 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.9 88.5 94.1 96.7 97.2 97.9 97.9 99.5 100.5 100.7 102 102.4 108.3 110 112.9 113.5 114.7 117.4 117.6 121.5 127.7 133.9 134.4 135 135 141.3 146.8 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.5 73.9 76 79.9 79.9 80.7 80.9 82.5 82.9 83.1 83.7 87.5 89.7 91.9 95.2 99.3 99.4 99.8 100.2 101.6 106.4 107.4 111 113.8 115.9 116.1 116.3 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60 65.7 80 89.3 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
161.8 165.5 178.8 183.9 202 204 207 209 209 210 212 216 216 218 222 231 232 232 234 234 ~ 209 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
128.6 137.3 148.7 149.9 156.2 156.2 157.8 159.2 165.5 172.8 173.4 176.4 179.7 180.4 180.5 181.1 184.5 185 187.8 189.3 191.3 192.6 193.7 198.4 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96 113.1 116.6 119.5 119.9 121.8 122.6 123.3 132 136.2 137.7 138.3 139.7 139.9 140.3 140.3 140.6 141 141.5 141.9 142.3 144.5 145.3 150.6 150.7 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
82.5 85.8 86.5 88.6 88.8 88.8 93.7 97.3 97.4 100.5 101.1 101.2 101.9 102.3 103.7 103.8 103.9 104 104.5 106.8 107.4 107.4 108.7 110 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.7 49.1 52.2 53 58.8 59.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
147.9 148.8 150.9 157.1 158 160 165.1 168.4 170.3 172 172.5 173.3 174.2 178 180.8 182.6 199.1 203 211 217 220 223 239 246 252 ~ 187 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.5 131.7 140.9 142 142.1 147.5 149.7 149.9 151.8 152.4 152.6 152.9 155.4 163.3 165.1 166.2 170.8 174.4 184.2 185.7 189.7 190.5 192.4 193.8 204 210 213 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
128 129.3 129.3 131.2 137.6 138.5 138.8 141.6 143 144.8 144.9 145.3 147.8 149.3 153.1 159 161.5 161.7 177 178.1 181.8 183.4 183.8 185 201 201 203 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
122.1 123.1 123.2 124.9 127.5 130.9 131.9 132.5 134.7 135.1 136.1 137.6 139.7 140.4 143.6 148.7 149.3 150.2 162.4 164.3 165.8 167.2 169.6 170 180.9 184 184.2 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
106.4 115.1 131 148.8 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
104.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
178.3 178.7 179.8 184.1 185.4 185.6 187.6 ~ 183 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
170.2 171.6 174.1 174.8 175.7 179 179.6 180.4 180.8 180.9 181.8 184.6 186.4 186.7 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
157.8 158.2 159 166.2 167.2 168.8 171.7 172.4 175.7 176.2 176.7 179.6 184.1 185.2 ~ 171 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102.5 105.2 107.8 111.8 112.8 116.4 117.3 119 121.1 123.7 124.8 125.4 127.2 128 134.1 135.4 137.1 138.9 142.1 142.3 143.7 143.7 148.6 153.2 153.5 156.4 160.2 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
96 96.9 100.5 104.1 105.7 107 108.3 109.9 110.9 111.9 113.9 114.6 118.7 120.1 120.9 122.5 124.5 124.7 125.9 126 126.2 129 129.1 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
64 119 125.6 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
55.7
62.7
64.5
64.5
60
59
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
175.2
181.6
180.4
186.9
174
174.2
179.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
179.5
186.2
182.9
187.5
178
180.6
184
177.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Resident Evil Requiem103.598.452.526.6
Call of Duty Black Ops 72241511184226
Anno 117: Pax Romana1159473382714.3
ARC Raiders151.8121.883.459.5
The Outer Worlds 287.379.447.130.4
Battlefield 6148134109794713.2
Borderlands 45547287.97
F1 2521120017528123.07
Doom: The Dark Ages927568664512
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered68583020
Assassin's Creed Shadows757060423425
Civilization 7170147100
Monster Hunter Wilds79724226
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2112936947
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle136402519
Stalker 262554835
Call of Duty Black Ops 6155144107977238
Until Dawn96725740
Space Marine 280777563
Star Wars Outlaws65584934
Black Myth: Wukong125856636257
F1 24269260224825217
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2685034
Ghost of Tsushima94887151
Horizon Forbidden West99807761
Dragon's Dogma 26660.2
Helldivers 2102.1101.297.481.3
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown356356356352
Alan Wake 28176674121
Counter-Strike 2222170.4156.5115.4
Cyberpunk 2077147128110996328
Baldur's Gate 31711421221208345
Strange Brigade45731827123916692
X-Plane 11.111251129474
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark2091721339953
Dota 2 Reborn187167158147125
The Witcher 3104.7
GTA V183179171131115103
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
14

1
19
15

6
19
11
3
11
12
6
9
13
11
2
9
3
3
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $1,890.50
    Lenovo Legion Pro 7i – AI-Powered Gaming Laptop – Intel® Core Ultra 7 255HX – 16" WQXGA PureSight OLED Display – 240Hz – NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 5070 Ti – 32GB Memory – 2TB Storage – PC GamePass
  • $1,439.10
    msi Katana 15 HX 15.6” 165Hz QHD+ Gaming Laptop: Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA Geforce RTX 5070, 32GB DDR5, 1TB NVMe SSD, RGB Keyboard, Win 11 Home: Black B14WGK-016US
  • $2,189.00
    ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Gaming Laptop, 16” ROG Nebula Display 16:10 2.5K 240Hz/3ms, NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 5070 Ti GPU, Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 275HX Processor, 32GB DDR5, 1TB SSD, Wi-Fi 7, Win11 Home
  • $1,420.76
    Lenovo Legion 5i – Gaming Laptop - Intel® Core™ i7-14700HX - 15" 2.5K WQXGA PureSight OLED Display–165Hz Refresh Rate–NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 5070 – 16 GB Memory – 1 TB Storage – 3 Months of PC GamePass
  • $2,056.49
    ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2025) Gaming Laptop, 18” ROG Nebula 16:10 2.5K 240Hz/3ms, NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 5070, Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 275HX, 32GB DDR5-5600, 2TB PCIe Gen 4 SSD, Wi-Fi 7, Windows 11 Pro

v1.35
log 11. 11:01:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:04:42 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.013s ... 0.015s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.017s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12925 +0.035s ... 0.052s

#13 got single benchmarks 12925 +0.1s ... 0.152s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.152s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +1.669s ... 1.821s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.821s

#17 Got 1319 rows for game benchmarks. +0.618s ... 2.439s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.439s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.033s ... 2.472s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.496s ... 2.968s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.335s ... 3.302s

#22 return log +0s ... 3.302s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop graphics card

在 18 英寸笔记本上获得最佳游戏体验?宏碁 Nitro 18 AI 游戏笔记本电脑评测

在 18 英寸笔记本上获得最佳游戏体验?宏碁 Nitro 18 AI 游戏笔记本电脑评测

虽然 15 至 17 英寸的游戏笔记本很多,但 18 英寸的大尺寸产品却相当有限。凭借 Nitro 18 AI,宏碁正试图与华硕和微星展开竞争。对比结果如何?
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 18", 3 kg
三星Galaxy Book6 Ultra 评测--配备华丽 OLED 和 RTX 5070 的多媒体笔记本电脑令人印象深刻

三星Galaxy Book6 Ultra 评测--配备华丽 OLED 和 RTX 5070 的多媒体笔记本电脑令人印象深刻

三星新推出的Galaxy Book6 Ultra 是一款功能强大的 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑,配备了令人惊叹的 OLED 屏幕、Panther Lake 处理器和GeForce RTX 5070。与Apple MacBook Pro 16 也有许多相似之处,但它足以击败Apple 的机器吗?
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16", 1.9 kg
ThinkPad X1 Extreme 当之无愧的继任者 - 联想 ThinkPad T1g 8 代评测

ThinkPad X1 Extreme 当之无愧的继任者 - 联想 ThinkPad T1g 8 代评测

联想推出的 ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 是备受喜爱的 ThinkPad X1 Extreme 的继任者,它是一款功能强大的多媒体笔记本电脑,拥有强大的硬件、雾面串联 OLED 触摸显示屏和联想有史以来为 ThinkPad 配置的最出色的键盘。
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16", 1.9 kg
桌上的 Acer Nitro V 17

宏碁 Nitro V 17 AI 评测:这款经济实惠的 17 英寸 RTX 5070 游戏笔记本性能如何?

宏碁 Nitro V 17 ANV17-41-R4CJ 的目标用户是以尽可能低的价格购买大型游戏笔记本电脑。在这篇简短的评测中,我们将考察这款笔记本在日常使用和游戏中的性能、噪音水平和电池续航能力,以及与噪音更大、功耗更高的竞争对手相比如何。
AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 17.3", 2.7 kg
XMG Fusion 16 OLED 评测 - 首款配备 OLED 屏幕的 XMG 笔记本电脑

XMG Fusion 16 OLED 评测 - 首款配备 OLED 屏幕的 XMG 笔记本电脑

随着 Fusion 16 的推出,XMG 首次推出了可选配 OLED 显示屏的游戏笔记本电脑。但是,为了更快的响应时间和 HDR 游戏,这种升级是否值得,还是坚持使用 IPS 面板更好?
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16", 2.1 kg

Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5070 和月亮湖技术的超薄 OLED 游戏机--宏碁掠夺者 Triton 14 AI 评测

Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » 平整、安静、高效--18 英寸华硕 TUF Gaming A18 评测

MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » 微星 Crosshair 16 HX AI 笔记本电脑评测:性能稳定,但也有不足之处,但不会影响核心游戏体验

Dell 16 Premium DA16250: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.30", 2.3 kg
  Review » 戴尔 16 Premium 笔记本电脑评测:比 XPS 16 更快、更高效

HP Omen 17z-db100: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  Review » 惠普 Omen 17z 游戏笔记本电脑评测:性能强劲,温度适宜

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想Legion 5 15IRX10 游戏笔记本评测--绚丽 OLED 和 RTX 5070,售价 1,499 欧元(约合人民币 1,742 元)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  Review » 经济实惠、更安静、更低温、更高效--配备 RTX 5070(非 Ti)的联想Legion Pro 5 16 评测

Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  Review » 更快、更高、更远,归功于 OC:联想 LOQ 17 RTX 5070 游戏笔记本评测

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 出色的串联 OLED 显示屏,1600 尼特--联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G10 灵光版评测

Schenker XMG Core 16 M25: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » XMG Core 16 M25 评测 - 配备 300 Hz 显示屏和 RTX 5070 的 AMD 游戏笔记本电脑

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  Review » 华硕 TUF Gaming A16 笔记本电脑评测:2,200 欧元豪赌 Zen 4 Hawk Point 和 RTX 5070

MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.1 kg
  Review » 微星Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW评测:大屏而不贵

MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 17.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » Zen 4 的极限:配备 Ryzen 9 8940HX 的微星 Crosshair A17 HX 游戏笔记本电脑评测

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » Alienware 16X Aurora 评测:兼顾高端制造与中端 GPU

Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » 华硕 ROG Strix G18 2025 评论--配备强大 AMD 9955HX 和 RTX 5070 的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑

Aorus Elite 16 AE6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » Aorus Elite 16 评论:高端 RTX 5070 游戏笔记本电脑值得购买吗?

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H: Intel Core i7-13620H, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  Review » 经济实惠的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑?技嘉游戏本 A16 评测

Razer Blade 14 2025: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 更薄且配备 OLED,但只有 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑 - Razer Blade 14 2025 评论

MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » 微星 Katana 17 HX 笔记本电脑评测:RTX 5070 玩家的改进空间

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 4K OLED 被 120 Hz 2.8K OLED 取代 - 华硕 ProArt P16 配 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑评测

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » 技嘉 Aero X16 评测:配备 Nvidia RTX 5070 笔记本电脑和可升级内存的时尚 AMD Zen 5 游戏机

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070

MSI Katana 15 HX B14WGK, i7-14650HX: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » 微星 Katana 15 HX B14WGK, i7-14650HX

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00"
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » 三星Galaxy Book6 Ultra

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IIAH10、RTX 5070

MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK

Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JPR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JPR

Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » 碁宏 Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » 联想Legion 7 16IAX10、RTX 5070

Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 18.00", 3 kg
  External Review » 宏碁 Nitro 18 AI AN18-61

MSI Crosshair A16 HX D8WGKG: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » 微星 Crosshair A16 HX D8WGKG

HP Omen 16-am0000: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-am0000

HP Omen Transcend 14-fb1000: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Transcend 14-fb1000

Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41

Dell 16 Premium: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium

Acer Nitro V16 ANV16-72: Intel Core 9 270H, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V16 ANV16-72

Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10

Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.50", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71

Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-71: Intel Core 9 270H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-71

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10

Gigabyte Gaming A16 CWH: Intel Core i7-13620H, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A16 CWH

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H: Intel Core i7-13620H, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H

Aorus Elite 16 AE6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Aorus Elite 16 AE6H

MSI Katana 15 HX B14WGK: Intel Core i9-14900HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » 微星 Katana 15 HX B14WGK

Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX10

Lenovo Legion 5 15AKP10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.10", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15AKP10

Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XWGG: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XWGG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CP: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CP

Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP

HP Omen 16-ap0000: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-ap0000

MSI Crosshair 17 HX AI D2XWGKG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 17.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 17 HX AI D2XWGKG

Gigabyte Aero X16 2WHA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 2WHA

Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LP: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LP

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10: Intel Core i9-14900HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10

Dell 16 Premium DA16250: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium DA16250

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070

MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG

Razer Blade 14 2025: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 14 2025

Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 三星终于在Galaxy Book6 Ultra 上采用了更好的 OLED 面板,亮度超过 1000 尼特,但竞争对手仍然更胜一筹

   » 三星抄袭Apple MacBook Pro 16,结果是一款非常出色的多媒体笔记本电脑

   » 三星Galaxy Book6 系列上手体验:所有型号、价格和上市日期

Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 高品质、出色的键盘、CAMM2-RAM、哑光 Tandem-OLED - ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 是联想的旗舰笔记本电脑

   » 联想 ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 是一款出色的多媒体笔记本电脑,几乎无人知晓

Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ): AMD Ryzen 7 260, 17.30", 2.7 kg
   » 除了宏碁 Nitro V 17 之外,几乎所有经济型游戏笔记本电脑都没有这项功能。

   » 太暗、太慢:宏碁 Nitro V 17 显示屏的真正问题所在

   » 宏碁 Nitro V 17 更高效:RTX 5070 游戏功耗降低 56

   » 低于 1400 美元的 RTX 5070 游戏:宏碁 Nitro V 17 经济实惠,比预期更好

Schenker XMG FUSION 16 (M25): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » 评测结果 XMG Fusion 16 (M25) - 配备 OLED 的优秀游戏笔记本电脑

Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 14.50", 1.6 kg
   » 紧凑型强机之战--宏碁掠夺者 Triton vs. 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 和 Razer Blade 14

Schenker XMG FUSION 16 (M25): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » 配备 OLED 屏幕的 XMG Fusion 16 可提高图像质量

Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 14.50", 1.6 kg
   » 宏碁掠夺者 Triton 14 AI 配备 RTX 5070,售价 2599 美元,实在太贵了

Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.6 kg
   » 适合创意人士的经济型笔记本电脑?华硕 TUF Gaming A18 为您提供机会

   » 华硕在 TUF Gaming A18 中大力推广省电模式:不寻常的性能模式是好是坏?

   » 经济型笔记本电脑,真的不是--还是不想成为?华硕 TUF Gaming A18 评论

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
   » 联想Legion 5 的游戏性能几乎与更昂贵的Legion Pro 5 相同

Dell 16 Premium DA16250: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.30", 2.3 kg
   » 小型 130 W USB-C 适配器为配备酷睿 Ultra H 和 RTX 5070 图形处理器的戴尔 16 Premium 提供动力

   » 戴尔 16 Premium CPU 的运行速度比 XPS 16 9640 快 15% 到 20%,但也有一个问题

   » 戴尔 16 Premium 60 WGeForce RTX 5070 既令人惊叹又令人失望

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
   » 游戏笔记本,创意无限:Legion Pro 5 的显示屏为何不仅适用于游戏

   » 少花钱多办事:在联想Legion Pro 中,使用 Ultra 7 而不是 Ultra 9 究竟会损失多少性能?

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
   » 联想Legion 5 15 搭载 RTX 5070,1500 欧元的售价难以望其项背

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
   » 8GB VRAM:现在还可以用,还是已经过时了?Legion Pro 5 16

HP Omen 17z-db100: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 17.30", 2.9 kg
   » 搭载 AMD Zen 5 的惠普 Omen 17 只比去年的 Zen 4 略快一点

   » 2025 配备 AMD Zen 5 的惠普 Omen 17 比普通游戏笔记本电脑运行更凉爽、更安静

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
   » 85% 对 86%:RTX 5070Legion Pro 的得分为何高于速度更快的 5070 Ti 型号?

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G10 是最好的 Windows 多媒体笔记本电脑吗?

   » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 采用的全新 Tandem-OLED 面板是目前最好的笔记本显示屏

Schenker XMG Core 16 M25: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » XMG 的酷睿 16 M25 AMD 是一款适合游戏和工作的全能机型

Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 14.50", 1.6 kg
   » 宏碁掠夺者 Triton 14 AI 配备触觉触控板、Lunar Lake 和轻型机箱,在更多市场上市

Schenker XMG Core 16 M25: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » 谁能以 2200 欧元的价格提供更好的 RTX 5070 游戏笔记本电脑? - XMG Core 16 对比华硕 TUF Gaming A16

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
   » 华硕 TUF Gaming A16 在性能和功能方面不平衡

   » 华硕为新款 TUF Gaming A16 配备了经过改进的 165 Hz 显示屏和可更换内存

MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.1 kg
   » 微星Crosshair 18 HX省略了这一本可使其更具吸引力的功能

   » 微星 Crosshair 18 AX 是最经济实惠的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑之一,配备 Core Ultra 9 275HX

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » Alienware 16X Aurora 上的 "大声超速 "模式不值得在性能上稍有提升

   » 戴尔 Alienware 16X 极光是一款面向大众的精简版 Area-51 游戏笔记本电脑

Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 2.9 kg
   » 配备 RTX 5070 图形处理器的华硕 ROG Strix G18 2025 2300 欧元太贵了

   » 对于游戏笔记本电脑来说,性能和功能哪个更重要?

Razer Blade 14 2025: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 对于 Blade 14 而言,8 GB VRAM 是否足够?对于 1080p 游戏来说,是的

   » Razer 的 Blade 14 在性能上无法与华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 相媲美,但价格却更实惠。

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 华硕只为 ProArt P16 提供 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑是个错误。

   » 华硕 ProArt P16 发布,配备 OLED 触摸屏、最高 64GB 内存和 RTX 5070

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P500 *
Vega 10
Vega 9
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)