Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop是在 2025 年 CES 上发布的 Blackwell 系列笔记本电脑移动显卡。它基于 GB206 芯片,拥有 4608 个着色器/CUDA 内核,时钟频率为 1425 - 2347 MHz(取决于型号)。显存为 8 GB GDDR7,采用 128 位内存总线。

架构

NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 笔记本电脑拥有全新的 Tensor(第五代)和 RT 内核(第四代),性能达到 798 AI TOPS。Blackwell 架构率先采用了全新的 DLSS 4 多帧生成技术,由于改进了 AI 功能,每秒可生成更多帧数,同时使用更少的内存并提供更好的图像质量。Nvidia 还设法提高了 DLSS、帧生成和光线重构功能(之前的 RTX 4000 系列也有这些功能)的性能和输出质量。此外,新型号现在还支持具有低延迟的 Reflex 2 模式和 Frame Warp。

性能

RTX 5070 Mobile 的游戏性能在很大程度上取决于笔记本电脑的散热和 TDP 设置。因此,最大时钟频率也会在 1425 到 2347 MHz 之间变化。平均而言,性能通常略高于旧版的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU但低于 RTX 3080 Ti 笔记本电脑.Blackwell 架构的一个新功能是在 DLSS4 中支持多帧生成(MFG)。这可以大幅提高帧率,但如果没有 MFG,您应该已经达到 50 帧以上,以实现可玩的延迟。

该芯片采用当前的台积电 4N 工艺制造。

 

 

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X6
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines4608 - unified
TMUs144
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores36
Tensor / AI Cores144
Core Speed907 - 2347 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance23.22 TFLOPS FP16, 23.22 TFLOPS FP32
AI GPU798 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 4.608 KB, L2: 32.768 KB
Memory Speed32000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth512 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption100 Watt (50 - 100 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
PredecessorGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 2796     avg: 3338     median: 3438 (24%)     max: 3608 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 2441     avg: 2927     median: 2952 (20%)     max: 3195 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 11847     avg: 13918     median: 14367 (33%)     max: 14954 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 22444     avg: 24029     median: 24210 (28%)     max: 24949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 25640     avg: 30516     median: 31018 (47%)     max: 34042 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 28759     avg: 35406     median: 36124.5 (33%)     max: 38680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 11192     avg: 13243     median: 13357.5 (36%)     max: 14448 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 10851     avg: 13331     median: 13583 (28%)     max: 14771 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -99%
...
10783 -19%
10979 -18%
11067 -17%
11609 -13%
11777 -12%
11837 -11%
11850 -11%
12640 -5%
12806 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
13331
15184 14%
16308 22%
16838 26%
17764 33%
19434 46%
20950 57%
21099 58%
Nvidia RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23742 78%
23746 78%
...
Nvidia RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23742 78%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
46337 248%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 56625     avg: 64657     median: 65334 (62%)     max: 71379 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 119532     avg: 149238     median: 149907 (37%)     max: 186504 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 32410     avg: 36418     median: 36714.5 (44%)     max: 40182 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 36721     avg: 44407     median: 44677.5 (34%)     max: 49568 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 29     avg: 32.3     median: 32 (5%)     max: 36 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 17     avg: 19.7     median: 19 (7%)     max: 24 Seconds
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 144.5     avg: 249.4     median: 231 (13%)     max: 341 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 115.1     avg: 124.2     median: 124.2 (47%)     max: 133.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 252.4     avg: 273.8     median: 273.8 (49%)     max: 295.1 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 637.4     avg: 689     median: 688.8 (51%)     max: 740.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 617.6     avg: 645     median: 645.2 (61%)     max: 672.8 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 879     median: 1127 (28%)     max: 1535 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 66275     avg: 129281     median: 133308 (35%)     max: 146025 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 4787     avg: 72755     median: 85385 (21%)     max: 122382 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 104.2     avg: 151.7     median: 155.2 (21%)     max: 194.7 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
118 Watt (16%)
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (73%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 108.7     avg: 185.5     median: 191.9 (53%)     max: 233 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.9     avg: 179.2     median: 180.3 (23%)     max: 227 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.428     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.761 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6

2025
low 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
130.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
111.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
77.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
51.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
64.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Borderlands 4

Borderlands 4

2025
med. 1920x1080
52.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
176.5 186.4 214 242 274 ~ 219 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
171 177.6 204 227 239 242 ~ 210 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
161 170.4 177.8 191.9 198.4 199 ~ 183 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.8 27.1 27.7 31 31.2 31.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.2 10.6 11.2 14.1 17 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
27.1 27.1 29 33.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
56.9
56.1
59.8
53.6
64.5
low 1920x1080
96.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64.6 69.6 75.2 88.4 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.5 66 68.1 74.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59 64.8 66.6 72.2 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
39.5 44.8 45.4 49.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
33.2  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
54.6 59.9 66.1 70 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
55.6 72.8 74.2 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
47.3 62.3 65.4 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.8 30.7 32.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19.5 20.2 20.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
30.3 32 34 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
39 61 73 75 80 81 82 83 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36 57 68 70 71 74 76 77 77 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32 49 59 60 61 61 63 63 64 66 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25 33 38 40 43 43 43 44 45 45 46 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22 28 30 31 33 34 36 37 38 38 39 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18 22 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
24 29 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
25 35 37 39 45 45 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
46
44
57
33
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
28
37
med. 1920x1080
154.1 155.9 201 ~ 170 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
131.7 142.7 166.5 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
90.7 97.9 111.6 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
69.1 80.1 86.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.6 74 75.9 78.2 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.1 43.2 44.5 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1 24.3 31.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
30.4 41.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
101.7 111.5 123.7 ~ 112 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
86.1 91.4 102.6 ~ 93 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.8 67.6 75.4 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42.6 45.5 52.1 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.5 61.5 71.5 ~ 64 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
131.6 137.6 138.7 153.8 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 39.1 54.7 56.1 60 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.3 19.1 31 42.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
7.6 12.3 24 32.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
54.7 64 68.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.7 54.1 59.3 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
45.7 47.1 50.4 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
34.2 36 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
66.9 74.1 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
155  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95 98 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68 75 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
76.8 100.7 109.5 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
59.6 75.9 81.3 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.8 59 61.8 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35.4 44.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
46.7 57.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
64.7 73.1 101.8 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
61.6 70.5 99.2 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
58.9 68.1 97.3 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
54.7 70.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.5 89.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
58.6 65.4 71.8 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
53.5 58.5 62 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
47.5 49.4 50.3 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
32.4 35.1 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
48.2 48.5 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
83 106 114 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63 79 84 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49 62 65 66 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 36 36 37 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20 26 26 27 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
31 39 40 41 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
127
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
18
42
45
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
242 242 288 333 ~ 276 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
221 238 241 271 275 312 ~ 260 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
186 199.3 223 228 229 231 234 241 244 247 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.8 77.7 80.7 83.3 85.3 86.1 86.6 87.1 88 88.3 88.8 90.2 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40.3 48.7 51.1 51.9 52.6 52.7 53.4 53.5 54.7 54.8 55.3 56.9 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.5 19 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
18.9 22.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.9 76.1 79.2 81.8 81.9 82.4 84 85.4 85.8 86.7 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
64.1 70 71 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.3 51.4 53.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.7 36.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49.4 56.2 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
84.5 97.4 100 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
80.4 91 92.1 ~ 88 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
64.9 71 75.8 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
49.1 53.8 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
66.5 74.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
91.1 98.5 108.1 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
74.9 82.1 82.6 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
73.2 77.9 81 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.9 64 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
70.3 81.3 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
102.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
101.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
97.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
81.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
352  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
84.1 84.7 86.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8 77.8 82.4 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.6 64.6 69.1 71.3 72.5 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40.5 41 41.5 43.8 45.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.6 23.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
106.8
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
37.7
30.9
med. 1920x1080
222  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
170.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
156.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
115.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
127 128.5 130.8 134.9 140.7 148.7 149.5 157.8 168.2 169.7 171.8 180.3 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90.2 107.8 112.6 118.3 121.1 121.2 126.8 129 132.5 134.3 138.3 141.7 142.6 142.7 144.1 146.4 167 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.5 91 104.6 108 108.3 109.4 109.7 112.8 113.8 114.7 117.7 118.2 118.6 121.2 121.3 122 122.8 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.5 82.4 90.1 90.4 94.8 97.8 98.3 98.9 100 101.5 101.5 101.9 102.9 104.3 106.4 106.7 107 107.1 108.7 109.4 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51.9 57.2 58.3 58.4 62.8 63.4 64.5 64.6 65.1 65.4 65.9 66 66 66.8 66.9 67.4 67.8 68.2 68.3 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.4 28.4 30.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
73.4 74.3 76.6 76.7 78.4 79.1 80.1 80.7 81 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
161
177.2
138.4
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
35.3
44.9
45.8
44.6
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
6.4
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
89.7
88.1
89.2
96
76.2
98.7
96.9
94.6
73.4
97.2
96.3
110.2
91.8
89.7
92.1
99.9
96.7
93.1
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
9.7
low 1920x1080
149.5 159.5 165.1 171.3 173.6 176.7 178.7 179.1 181.7 192.4 192.4 ~ 175 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
118.5 125.5 127.2 134.3 139.4 142.5 143.6 144 146 146.5 152 152.9 153.1 154.5 155.9 166.3 ~ 144 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
87.5 106 109.8 112.9 123.8 123.9 124.8 126.1 128.2 129.3 130.7 130.8 132.8 134.5 134.6 144.8 ~ 124 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.3 101.3 103.5 108 108.8 109 109.4 121.3 121.9 121.9 124.9 127.2 127.3 127.5 128.4 128.8 130.6 135.8 140.8 141.4 ~ 120 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
63.1 71.1 73.8 75.8 81.3 82.5 84.9 84.9 85.4 88.4 88.6 89 89.4 90 90.1 90.5 91.3 96.3 96.4 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
41.1 46 49.6 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
65.1 77.6 83.7 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
107.3 127.4 135.8 139.4 140 ~ 130 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
202
250.1
197.8
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
260 391 424 430 450 470 507 510 511 520 560 649 ~ 474 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
253 281 282 287 318 331 332 339 339 341 346 346 349 369 ~ 322 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
232 240 241 243 270 277 280 281 285 291 293 294 295 300 ~ 273 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
203 204 208 219 234 244 246 246 247 254 258 258 258 259 259 ~ 240 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
137 140.2 149.7 164.2 165.8 166.6 168.6 168.9 169.3 172.2 172.7 175.3 177.4 177.9 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
90.3 95.8 96.1 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
102.8 104.3 108.2 111.8 112.9 114.2 114.3 125.1 125.9 128.6 132.4 135.5 146.6 156 157.5 161.3 162.3 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94.1 97.9 100.5 100.7 102 108.3 110 112.9 113.5 114.7 117.6 121.5 127.7 134.4 135 135 141.3 146.8 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.9 80.7 82.9 83.1 83.7 87.5 91.9 95.2 99.4 99.8 100.2 101.6 106.4 107.4 113.8 115.9 116.1 116.3 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
65.7 80 89.3 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
165.5 202 207 209 210 212 216 218 222 232 232 234 ~ 213 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
128.6 148.7 149.9 165.5 172.8 173.4 180.4 180.5 181.1 184.5 185 187.8 189.3 191.3 193.7 198.4 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96 113.1 119.5 132 137.7 138.3 139.7 139.9 140.3 140.6 141 141.5 142.3 144.5 145.3 150.6 150.7 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
82.5 85.8 86.5 100.5 101.1 101.2 102.3 103.7 103.8 103.9 104.5 106.8 107.4 107.4 108.7 110 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49.1 58.8 59.1 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
148.8 158 168.4 170.3 172 172.5 174.2 178 180.8 182.6 199.1 203 220 223 239 246 252 ~ 193 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.5 140.9 149.7 151.8 152.6 152.9 163.3 165.1 166.2 170.8 174.4 184.2 189.7 192.4 193.8 204 210 213 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
129.3 138.8 141.6 143 144.9 145.3 147.8 153.1 159 161.5 161.7 178.1 181.8 183.4 185 201 201 203 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
123.2 130.9 131.9 135.1 136.1 137.6 140.4 143.6 148.7 149.3 150.2 162.4 165.8 167.2 169.6 180.9 184 184.2 ~ 152 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
106.4 131 148.8 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
104.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
178.7 185.4 185.6 187.6 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
171.6 179 180.4 180.8 180.9 181.8 184.6 186.4 186.7 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
158.2 166.2 167.2 175.7 176.2 176.7 179.6 184.1 185.2 ~ 174 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102.5 111.8 112.8 119 121.1 123.7 124.8 127.2 134.1 135.4 138.9 142.1 143.7 148.6 153.2 153.5 156.4 160.2 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
96 96.9 105.7 108.3 109.9 110.9 113.9 114.6 118.7 120.1 120.9 122.5 124.7 126 126.2 129 129.1 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
119 125.6 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
55.7
62.7
64.5
64.5
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
181.6
180.4
186.9
174
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
186.2
182.9
187.5
178
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Battlefield 6141130.3111.277.851.213.2
Borderlands 452.342.527.4
F1 252192101832912
Doom: The Dark Ages96.274676645
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered68583020
Assassin's Creed Shadows726758403320
Civilization 7170147100
Monster Hunter Wilds79724226
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2112936947
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle140422519
Stalker 262554835
Call of Duty Black Ops 6155144107977238
Until Dawn96725740
Space Marine 280777563
Star Wars Outlaws65584934
Black Myth: Wukong101756134257
F1 24276260226845217
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2685034
Ghost of Tsushima94887151
Horizon Forbidden West99807761
Dragon's Dogma 26660.2
Helldivers 2102.1101.297.481.3
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown356356356352
Alan Wake 28579684221
Counter-Strike 2222170.4156.5115.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty1511301121006428
Baldur's Gate 31751441241208546
Strange Brigade47432227324016594
X-Plane 11.111291179878
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark21317613610156
Dota 2 Reborn193172164152129
The Witcher 3104.7
GTA V184181174134116122
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
12

1
16
13

7
14
10
3
7
11
6
5
11
11
2
6
3
2
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.34
log 29. 04:52:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 Oct 2025 05:58:49 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.032s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12925 +0.013s ... 0.045s

#13 got single benchmarks 12925 +0.07s ... 0.114s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.58s ... 0.694s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.695s

#17 Got 922 rows for game benchmarks. +0.391s ... 1.086s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.086s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.023s ... 1.109s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.306s ... 1.415s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.418s

#22 return log +0s ... 1.418s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop graphics card

惠普 Omen 17z 游戏笔记本电脑评测:性能强劲,温度适宜

惠普 Omen 17z 游戏笔记本电脑评测:性能强劲,温度适宜

设计也许并不新颖,但其均衡的规格和游戏时相对较低的核心温度,让 Omen 17z 在与其他中端游戏机的竞争中占得先机。
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 17.30" | 2.9 kg
联想Legion 5 15IRX10 游戏笔记本评测--绚丽 OLED 和 RTX 5070,售价 1,499 欧元(约合人民币 1,742 元)

联想Legion 5 15IRX10 游戏笔记本评测--绚丽 OLED 和 RTX 5070,售价 1,499 欧元(约合人民币 1,742 元)

联想更胜一筹,为其中端Legion 5 15 配备了出色的 OLED 面板和移动GeForce RTX 5070,售价为 1499 欧元(约合 1742 美元)。这一次,英特尔酷睿 i7-13650HX 处理器承担了处理任务。这是市场上最好的主流游戏笔记本电脑吗?...
Intel Core i7-13650HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 15.10" | 1.9 kg
经济实惠、更安静、更低温、更高效--配备 RTX 5070(非 Ti)的联想Legion Pro 5 16 评测

经济实惠、更安静、更低温、更高效--配备 RTX 5070(非 Ti)的联想Legion Pro 5 16 评测

新 CPU、新 GPU、新测试。我们要测试的是,配备 RTX 5070 和英特尔酷睿至尊 7 255HX 的Legion Pro 5 16 价格是否能跟上配备 RTX 5070 Ti 和酷睿至尊 9 275HX 的Legion 版本。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.3 kg
更快、更高、更远,归功于 OC:联想 LOQ 17 RTX 5070 游戏笔记本评测

更快、更高、更远,归功于 OC:联想 LOQ 17 RTX 5070 游戏笔记本评测

在评测了联想 LOQ 系列的多个 15 英寸和 16 英寸版本之后,现在又到了评测更大机型 LOQ 17 的时候了。这款游戏笔记本在竞争激烈的中端市场中表现如何?...
Intel Core i7-14700HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 17.30" | 2.9 kg
出色的串联 OLED 显示屏,1600 尼特--联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G10 灵光版评测

出色的串联 OLED 显示屏,1600 尼特--联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G10 灵光版评测

Yoga Pro 9i 16 已经配备了非常出色的 OLED 屏幕,但新的串联 OLED 面板更加出色。我们测试了配备全新 3.2K OLED 面板、酷睿 Ultra 9、64 GB 内存和移动GeForce RTX 5070 的高端配置。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.00" | 1.9 kg

Schenker XMG Core 16 M25: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » XMG Core 16 M25 评测 - 配备 300 Hz 显示屏和 RTX 5070 的 AMD 游戏笔记本电脑

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  Review » 华硕 TUF Gaming A16 笔记本电脑评测:2,200 欧元豪赌 Zen 4 Hawk Point 和 RTX 5070

MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.1 kg
  Review » 微星Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW评测:大屏而不贵

MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 17.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » Zen 4 的极限:配备 Ryzen 9 8940HX 的微星 Crosshair A17 HX 游戏笔记本电脑评测

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » Alienware 16X Aurora 评测:兼顾高端制造与中端 GPU

Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » 华硕 ROG Strix G18 2025 评论--配备强大 AMD 9955HX 和 RTX 5070 的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑

Aorus Elite 16 AE6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » Aorus Elite 16 评论:高端 RTX 5070 游戏笔记本电脑值得购买吗?

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H: Intel Core i7-13620H, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  Review » 经济实惠的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑?技嘉游戏本 A16 评测

Razer Blade 14 2025: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 更薄且配备 OLED,但只有 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑 - Razer Blade 14 2025 评论

MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » 微星 Katana 17 HX 笔记本电脑评测:RTX 5070 玩家的改进空间

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 4K OLED 被 120 Hz 2.8K OLED 取代 - 华硕 ProArt P16 配 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑评测

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » 技嘉 Aero X16 评测:配备 Nvidia RTX 5070 笔记本电脑和可升级内存的时尚 AMD Zen 5 游戏机

Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XWGG: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XWGG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CP: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CP

Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP

HP Omen 16-ap0000: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-ap0000

MSI Crosshair 17 HX AI D2XWGKG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 17.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 17 HX AI D2XWGKG

Gigabyte Aero X16 2WHA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 2WHA

Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LP: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LP

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10: Intel Core i9-14900HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10

Dell 16 Premium DA16250: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium DA16250

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070

MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG

Razer Blade 14 2025: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 14 2025

Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
   » 8GB VRAM:现在还可以用,还是已经过时了?Legion Pro 5 16

HP Omen 17z-db100: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 17.30", 2.9 kg
   » 搭载 AMD Zen 5 的惠普 Omen 17 只比去年的 Zen 4 略快一点

   » 2025 配备 AMD Zen 5 的惠普 Omen 17 比普通游戏笔记本电脑运行更凉爽、更安静

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
   » 85% 对 86%:RTX 5070Legion Pro 的得分为何高于速度更快的 5070 Ti 型号?

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G10 是最好的 Windows 多媒体笔记本电脑吗?

   » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 采用的全新 Tandem-OLED 面板是目前最好的笔记本显示屏

Schenker XMG Core 16 M25: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » XMG 的酷睿 16 M25 AMD 是一款适合游戏和工作的全能机型

Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 14.50", 1.6 kg
   » 宏碁掠夺者 Triton 14 AI 配备触觉触控板、Lunar Lake 和轻型机箱,在更多市场上市

Schenker XMG Core 16 M25: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » 谁能以 2200 欧元的价格提供更好的 RTX 5070 游戏笔记本电脑? - XMG Core 16 对比华硕 TUF Gaming A16

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
   » 华硕 TUF Gaming A16 在性能和功能方面不平衡

   » 华硕为新款 TUF Gaming A16 配备了经过改进的 165 Hz 显示屏和可更换内存

MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.1 kg
   » 微星Crosshair 18 HX省略了这一本可使其更具吸引力的功能

   » 微星 Crosshair 18 AX 是最经济实惠的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑之一,配备 Core Ultra 9 275HX

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » Alienware 16X Aurora 上的 "大声超速 "模式不值得在性能上稍有提升

   » 戴尔 Alienware 16X 极光是一款面向大众的精简版 Area-51 游戏笔记本电脑

Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 2.9 kg
   » 配备 RTX 5070 图形处理器的华硕 ROG Strix G18 2025 2300 欧元太贵了

   » 对于游戏笔记本电脑来说,性能和功能哪个更重要?

Razer Blade 14 2025: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 对于 Blade 14 而言,8 GB VRAM 是否足够?对于 1080p 游戏来说,是的

   » Razer 的 Blade 14 在性能上无法与华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 相媲美,但价格却更实惠。

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 华硕只为 ProArt P16 提供 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑是个错误。

   » 华硕 ProArt P16 发布,配备 OLED 触摸屏、最高 64GB 内存和 RTX 5070

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Radeon 8040S *
Arc B 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Class 3

Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Arc 140T *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Arc 130T *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-10-28)