Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Nvidia GeForce MX330是专用于笔记本电脑的入门级移动图形卡。它于2020年2月发布,基本上是重命名的Geforce MX250 / GeForce MX150 /台式机GeForce GT1030。它使用与MX250相同的GP108芯片(例如,GP108-655-A1)。它提供了与MX250和MX150相同的384个CUDA内核,并且频率仅略有提高(对于25瓦特版本,+ 12 MHz Boost = 0.8%)。专用的GDDR5图形内存通过64位内存总线连接,频率为3500 MHz(有效7000 MHz),最大带宽为48 GB / s。同样有25瓦和12瓦(低功率)的变体。

在Nvidia驱动程序中,GeForce MX330驱动程序的硬件ID为1D16。

GP108芯片采用16 nm FinFET工艺制造,并提供了许多新功能,包括对DisplayPort 1.4(就绪),HDMI 2.0b,HDR的支持以及改进的H.265视频解编码(PlayReady 3.0)。但是,由于需要至少3 GB的图形内存,因此无法运行Netflix的4K HDR。与较大的Pascal芯片相比, GP108不支持用于VR和G-Sync的同步多投影(SMP)。完整的改进清单和新的Pascal台式机GPU可在我们专用的Pascal架构文章中找到。

GeForce MX330的性能应与前几年的MX150和MX250相同。有关游戏基准,请参见我们的GeForce MX250页面。 Nvidia在产品页面上指出,MX330在i7-1065G7中提供的性能是Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7的2倍(而MX350是2.5倍)。因此,像Red Dead Redemption 2这样要求非常苛刻的游戏将无法流畅运行,而像FIFA 20或Farming Simulator 19这样要求较低的较旧游戏则应在中等设置下运行良好(请参阅以下有关不同笔记本电脑的基准测试结果)。但是,低功耗版本(请参见下文)显然会更慢。

有一个低功率版本的N17S-LP,其TGP为12瓦(从LP MX250的10瓦增加了2瓦)和一个“正常”的25瓦N17S-G3。两种变体的性能应该明显不同。低功耗型号提供了相对较慢的746-936 MHz频率·基本-Turbo),其中25瓦G3型号的频率为1531-1594(类似于MX250和+ 70%升压频率,而LP型号则类似)。

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce MX300 Series
GeForce MX450 896 @ 1.4 - 1.58 GHz64 Bit @ 10002 MHz
GeForce MX350 640 @ 1.35 - 1.47 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX330 384 @ 1.53 - 1.59 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-LP / N17S-G3
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed1531 - 1594 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology16 nm
FeaturesVulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Optimus, GameWorks
Date of Announcement20.02.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
8.6 pt (9%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -84%
...
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M -10%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M -6%
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX -5%
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) -4%
Intel Iris Graphics 540 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M -4%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 1%
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 1%
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX 2%
Intel HD Graphics 630 6%
Intel Iris Graphics 550 6%
AMD FirePro W5130M 6%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 8%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (Desktop) 1019%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1178     avg: 1236     median: 1235.5 (7%)     max: 1293 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1059     avg: 1136     median: 1160 (6%)     max: 1190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 234893     avg: 243721     median: 243721 (38%)     max: 252549 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 32370     avg: 49651     median: 49651 (7%)     max: 66932 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12137     avg: 14691     median: 15382 (20%)     max: 16555 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 15595     avg: 19968     median: 20729 (10%)     max: 23580 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3308     avg: 3436     median: 3470 (9%)     max: 3530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3581     avg: 3727     median: 3762 (8%)     max: 3838 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 21238     avg: 45268     median: 45267.5 (6%)     max: 69297 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4898     avg: 5080     median: 5121.5 (13%)     max: 5180 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4616     avg: 4787     median: 4834 (8%)     max: 4863 Points
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 -9%
AMD Radeon Pro 450 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P600 -3%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X -2%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 5%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 7%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 8%
...
0%
100%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
18.1 fps (9%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
735 Samples/s (8%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1047 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2890 points (6%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45     avg: 49.9     median: 49.9 (9%)     max: 54.8 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 48.3     avg: 73.6     median: 73.6 (12%)     max: 98.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 53     avg: 57.6     median: 57.6 (13%)     max: 62.2 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1683 MHz (88%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
1403 MHz (71%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
19.7 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.2 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.2 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
12 fps
low 1280x720
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
44.3 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.7 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.4 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35.3 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.7 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.1 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
37.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
26.2 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.9 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
125 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79.5 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75.1 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.1 fps  fps    + Compare