Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU(移动、NVIDIA_DEV.2583、GN20-P0)是最慢的RTX 3000移动卡,基于GA107安培芯片。 提供 2048 CUDA、16 条光线跟踪和 64 个张量核心。 内存总线限制为128位,支持4GB的GDDR6专用图形内存。时钟速度因TGP变体而异,35~80瓦特的TGP变体为735~1463(基本)和1035~1695(升压)的范围(请参阅下表)。

暂定时钟速率

TGP(功耗)35W 40W 45W 50W 60W 70W 80W

基本时钟速度 (MHz)713938 1065 1178 1238 1403 1530

Boost Clock Speed (MHz) 10581223 13431455 1500 16351740

性能必须介于旧的 GTX 1650 Ti 和 1660 Ti Max-Q 之间,具体取决于所使用的 TGP 变型。 因此,它最适合全高清游戏(1920 x 1080),在要求苛刻的游戏中设置高细节。 此性能不足以在大多数游戏中启用 Raytracing,但某些游戏可以使用 Tensor 核心作为 DLSS(并且性能略有下降)。 请注意,低TGP变型可能会导致性能大幅下降。

高速RTX 3050 Ti以相似的时钟速度和TGP设置提供25%的内核。

GA107芯片提供3,072个FP32ALU,其中一半可以执行INT32指令(1,536个INT32ALU)。 但是,RTX 3050 可能不使用芯片上的所有 ALU。 如果使用 Turing,则所有着色器都可以执行 FP32 或 INT32 指令。 Nvidia还改善了芯片上的光线跟踪和张量核。 安培芯片还包括改进的第 5代视频编码器 (H.264和 H.265的 NVENC)和第 7代解码器 (包括 AV1的各种格式 )。

GA107芯片由Samsung以8nm(8N)制造,与TSMC的7nm节点(AMD、专业GA100安培芯片等)相比,性能差很多。

GeForce RTX 3000 Series

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 10752 @ 1.56 - 1.86 GHz384 Bit @ 21000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 10496 @ 1.4 - 1.7 GHz384 Bit @ 19500 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 10240 @ 1.37 - 1.67 GHz384 Bit @ 19000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB 8960/ cores @ 1.26 - 1.71 GHz384 Bit @ 19000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 8704 @ 1.45 - 1.71 GHz320 Bit @ 19000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 6144 @ 1.58 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 19000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU 7424 @ 0.98 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 5888 @ 1.5 - 1.73 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU 6144 @ 0.78 - 1.25 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 4864 @ 1.41 - 1.67 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU 5888 @ 0.92 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU 5120 @ 0.78 - 1.29 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q 6144 @ 0.78 - 1.25 GHz256 Bit @ 6000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3584 @ 1.32 - 1.78 GHz192 Bit @ 15000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q 5120 @ 1.29 GHz256 Bit
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU 3840 @ 0.82 - 1.7 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q 3840 @ 1.28 GHz192 Bit
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 2560 @ 1.55 - 1.78 GHz128 Bit Bit @ 1750 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU 2560 @ 1.22 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU 2560 @ 1.24 - 1.49 GHz96 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU 2048 @ 1.24 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
CodenameGN20-P0
ArchitectureAmpere
Pipelines2048 - unified
TMUs64
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores16
Tensor / AI Cores64
Core Speed1238 - 1500 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
technology8 nm
PCIe4.0
DisplaysHDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
FeaturesNVIDIA DLSS, NVIDIA Reflex, Resizable BAR, NVIDIA Broadcast, NVIDIA Ansel, NVIDIA ShadowPlay®, NVIDIA G-SYNC®, Advanced Optimus, Nvidia Max-Q, Dynamic Boost
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement11.05.2021

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.6 pt (17%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -99%
...
4.65 -17%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
4.67 -16%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
4.72 -15%
4.75 -15%
4.81 -14%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
5.13 -8%
5.27 -5%
5.38 -3%
5.45 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
5.57
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
5.58 0%
5.59 0%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
5.72 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
5.94 7%
5.99 8%
6.08 9%
6.09 9%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
6.2 11%
6.68 20%
...
21.1 279%
max:
33.3 498%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3500     avg: 4755     median: 4866 (14%)     max: 5506 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3281     avg: 4517     median: 4503 (12%)     max: 5295 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -97%
...
3610 -20%
3650 -19%
3689 -18%
3883 -14%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3960 -12%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
4155 -8%
4209 -7%
4256 -6%
4372 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
4517
4546 1%
4661 3%
4687 4%
5089 13%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
5132 14%
5151 14%
5177 15%
5464 21%
5637 25%
...
19434 330%
max:
36485 708%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 474692     avg: 480365     median: 480364 (54%)     max: 486037 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
66941 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20526     avg: 34596     median: 34692 (37%)     max: 45518 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 33426     avg: 65657     median: 65911 (17%)     max: 87403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8504     avg: 10731     median: 10997 (19%)     max: 12525 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 9138     avg: 11915     median: 12228.5 (14%)     max: 14157 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 35518     avg: 78239     median: 64642.5 (8%)     max: 148153 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 24486     avg: 28914     median: 28914 (15%)     max: 33342 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 7247     avg: 8819     median: 8819 (10%)     max: 10391 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 30032     avg: 31289     median: 30196 (28%)     max: 33639 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 39628     avg: 43897     median: 43448 (17%)     max: 48616 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 11832     avg: 14981     median: 15369.5 (21%)     max: 18259 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 11980     avg: 15711     median: 15725 (14%)     max: 18557 Points
171.8 -99%
...
14147 -10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
14302 -9%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
14412 -8%
14428 -8%
14692 -6%
14725 -6%
15135 -4%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
15223 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
15433 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
15711
15823 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
15837 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
16233 3%
16564 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
17028 8%
17113 9%
17562 12%
17690 13%
17711 13%
...
59943 282%
max:
106023 575%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
43216 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
47209 Points (27%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
42370 -10%
42967 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
43525 -8%
43587 -8%
44188 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
45346 -4%
45988 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
46624 -1%
46945 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
47209
47227 0%
49207 4%
51344 9%
51396 9%
52230 11%
52733 12%
52917 12%
53510 13%
54830 16%
...
132443 181%
max:
170928 262%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 36425     avg: 39512     median: 39512 (52%)     max: 42599 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 97     avg: 119.2     median: 112 (17%)     max: 152 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 53     avg: 63.1     median: 58.5 (22%)     max: 99 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom HIP *
668 Seconds (55%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
65 fps (17%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
49.5 fps (11%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
31.5 fps (7%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
136 fps (15%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
9.2 fps (3%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
102 fps (15%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
67.5 fps (8%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
97.8 fps (17%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
101 fps (20%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
14.7 fps (15%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
166 fps (24%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
9.3 fps (8%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
60.4 fps (30%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
28.5 fps (18%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
42.9 fps (19%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
11506 points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
93.2 fps (32%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 61.6     avg: 149.7     median: 140 (8%)     max: 217.24 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 99.6     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 99.62 %
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
252.9 fps (28%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
147 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
49471 points (14%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2038 Samples/s (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
4713 Samples/s (8%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
10499 points (11%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 49.2     avg: 89     median: 92.8 (13%)     max: 126.2 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59.4     avg: 94.1     median: 92.5 (13%)     max: 136.8 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 63.3     avg: 97.8     median: 96.1 (21%)     max: 139.5 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3735     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (47%)     max: 0.641 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.3808     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (41%)     max: 0.646 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 41.7     avg: 48.4     median: 49 (78%)     max: 53.4 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1395     avg: 1667     median: 1710 (67%)     max: 1852 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 1037     avg: 1310     median: 1309.5 (52%)     max: 1582 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Last Epoch

Last Epoch

2024
low 1920x1080
118.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
79.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
56.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Skull & Bones

Skull & Bones

2024
low 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
67.3
Enshrouded

Enshrouded

2024
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Max. Performance 1280x720
66.1
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
272  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
227  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
219  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
129.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
97.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
85.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
110.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
80.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
71.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
51.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Epic Preset + Epic RTX Global Illumination 1920x1080
51.1
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
52
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

2023
low 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
65.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
51.3
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
44.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
65.7
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
med. 1920x1080
106.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
EA Sports FC 24

EA Sports FC 24

2023
ultra 1920x1080
73.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
170.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
96.3 154.3 ~ 125 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
71.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
83.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
11.9
Steam Deck 1280x720
84
Ultra Preset (FSR on) 1920x1080
35.5
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
82.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
72.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
low 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
60
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
41.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
57.8
low 1920x1080
80.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
53.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 1280x720
49.4
med. 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
56.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
54.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
37.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
60.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
35.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very High Preset + Very High Raytracing TAA 1920x1080
24.1
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
170
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
94.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
75.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
69.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
57.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
26.3 33.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.3 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.2 27.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.2 27.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
56.1
Dead Island 2

Dead Island 2

2023
low 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
89.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
70.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Last of Us

The Last of Us

2023
low 1920x1080
47.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
76.6
low 1920x1080
49.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
76.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
50.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
71.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
54.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
98.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
79.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
RT Ultra Preset / On FXAA 1920x1080
12.9
low 1920x1080
98.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
47.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
39.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
67.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
58.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
63.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very High Preset + Ray-Tracing TAA 1920x0180
19.1
low 1920x1080
28.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
85.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
49 63.7 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.3 52 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.7 39.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
120.6
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
112.7 119.4 133.9 137 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70 104.3 108.5 121.6 127 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61 75 75.2 85 97 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.3 21.8 22 25.3 32 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
5.3 13.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
5.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
182
188.9
163.9
205
med. 1920x1080
86.7 121.5 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
77.2 117.4 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
76.6 113.3 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
75.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58.2 62.7 81.8 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55.7 62.3 79.7 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
53.9 57 79.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
60 90.7 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.4 62.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.8 47.8 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
51.7 57.3 63 68.6 72.9 77.9 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.2 41.7 45.9 52 55 62.1 62.4 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.4 30.7 34.2 41 43 44 45.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.3 27.5 27.7 33.8 34 36.1 36.5 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
15.6 21 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
5.6  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
94.4
82.4
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
8.4
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
med. 1920x1080
36.9 55.6 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
35.9 54.2 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.2 48.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
116.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.4 93.4 113 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.4 77.6 98.6 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.7 58.8 72.9 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
38.8 58.6 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37.9 56 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
37.8 52.8 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
33.7 42.9 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.5 35.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
87 109 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84 104 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56 76 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
50.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41.3 42 59.6 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.7 34.8 47.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.6 23.4 31.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
73.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
123.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
105.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
90.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
63.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
63.5
low 1280x720
154  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
106
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
104
low 1280x720
96  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
77
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
7
low 1280x720
247  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
138  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
178
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
75 87 110 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
57 64 77 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52 62 67 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45 53 59 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
50  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
88
79
Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR TAA 1920x1080
37
low 1280x720
91.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
70.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
80.2
New World

New World

2021
low 1280x720
95  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
65.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Video Quality 1920x1080
81.2
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
low 1280x720
109  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
63.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
74.7
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
186 196 232 232 235 282 ~ 227 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
112 123.6 130 132.8 144 150 164.7 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.4 96 106.1 110 115 126 130.1 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.1 44.4 47.1 52 52.7 55 59.4 62 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30 32.1 36 43 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12 12.7 20.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
95.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
91.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
78.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
60.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
med. 1920x1080
78.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
69.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
51.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
37.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
96.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
78.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
43.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
73.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
66.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
57.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Outriders

Outriders

2021
med. 1920x1080
53.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
47.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
159.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
100.7 103 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.5 86.9 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.7 79.9 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39.7 49.1 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37 41.2 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31 36 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26 29.5 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
4.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
106  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69 71 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50 57 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45 53 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29 39 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
57.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
99  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27 36 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 27 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19 24 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
141  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66 73.4 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51 54.6 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 44.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33 34 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
80  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61 71 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54 60 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
med. 1920x1080
186  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
180  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
175  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
166  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
112  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
164  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
93.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
50.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
20.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
63.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
24.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
107.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
74.4
low 1280x720
99  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
79.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
38.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
183 218 ~ 201 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102 134 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
87 113 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66 81 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
253  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
122 129 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81 84.6 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58 62.4 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
38 42.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
73.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fall Guys

Fall Guys

2020
med. 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
92.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1920x1080
142
med. 1920x1080
86.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
80  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
71.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
52.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
64.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
61.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
47.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
23.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
181  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.3 108 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
71.1 104 ~ 88 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.4 43 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.8 27 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
111.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69.2 81.3 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.4 57.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.9 43.4 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.5 30.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.6  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
med. 1920x1080
62.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
med. 1920x1080
81.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
69.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
68.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
43  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
med. 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
132  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77 87 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66 69 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50 52 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
118  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
52  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
123  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.2 63.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.8 46.9 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.5 37.1 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28.6 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
89.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
68.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
92.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
89.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
83.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
65.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
105 118 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62 66 75 81 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50 63 71 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42 57 60 61 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
99
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
179.7 192 216 222 239 244 246 248 248 263 274 287 296 320 ~ 248 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78.6 90.4 93.4 93.5 104 112.5 114.1 115.2 118.2 118.4 120 125 130 131 132.4 134.7 135.8 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65.2 72.1 75 75.7 84 92.4 92.8 93.7 94.7 94.7 95.7 101 105 105.3 105.7 108.1 109.1 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.9 62.1 65.1 67.9 69.6 72 78.9 80.4 80.7 82.1 82.3 82.4 87 90.6 90.7 90.8 91.3 91.8 95.1 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41.1 48.7 63.4 66.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.4 34 35.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
75 90 104 127 131 138 156 ~ 117 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37 64 64 66 68 68 75 84 86 88 94 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36 56 61 61 62 64 70 79 80 80 85 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35 57 57 58 59 61 62 74 74 75 80 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
39 46 47 51 52 55 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19 19 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
99
92
77
83
56
77
low 1280x720
83.8 84.4 85.2 91 91.8 92.1 95.3 96.5 102 102.3 104.7 109.3 111 112 116 119 124.3 135.7 137.8 148.1 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65.9 68.3 77.1 78.4 80.3 80.4 81.2 84.3 87 88.4 89.9 94.8 95.2 95.7 98.5 101 102.4 114.8 117.2 129.9 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56 57.7 63.6 65.8 66.9 67.1 67.1 68 72.5 73.7 74.7 76.2 77.3 78.9 79.7 80 84.8 94.4 95.8 103.1 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.4 60.9 66.1 66.1 70.5 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
62 97.4 98.4 99.1 99.4 108.1 113.5 116.4 117 124.6 128.4 136 143.4 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.7 51.2 51.9 52.5 54.9 56.4 62.2 64.8 66.1 69.1 69.6 71.8 73.1 73.1 73.6 74 74 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.9 36.6 37.7 38.9 39.6 40 41.3 44.4 45 47.4 48.5 48.6 50.1 51 51.1 51.9 52.5 52.7 53.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.3 30.2 33 33 36.5 38.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15 16.8 17.4 21 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
91.1 115 117.2 120.7 124.9 125.2 128.4 129.7 138.6 139 143 146 148 150.9 162 162.4 163.4 174.4 176.5 187 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
90.3 104 106.4 111.4 112.2 115.7 118.6 122.7 123.7 130 131 137 138 138.6 141 142 143.8 158.7 163.2 170.8 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84 92.1 100.6 103.7 108.7 111 111.4 113 116 119.4 122 131 131.8 132.4 133 135 135.3 145 156.3 160.3 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
82.8 88.1 95.2 100.3 104.8 106.4 107.7 109 109.3 114 115.3 116 121.6 123 125 125 125.5 134.4 145 147.7 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
57.1 57.8 61.3 62.4 70.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
60 150.4 183.9 191.6 193.3 199 213.9 222.2 224.1 248.5 258 282.1 283 ~ 208 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
68.8 100.5 106.7 117.8 124.3 125 132.8 142 147 150.4 153.9 166 167.7 171.6 179 ~ 137 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
53.5 57.7 58.7 61.3 67.4 70.6 73.3 76 80.6 83.5 84.5 90.7 92.1 93.6 98.7 99 105.1 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.5 35 37.9 39.2 39.3 40 41.7 42.8 43.9 44 46 47 47.7 48.7 49 51.6 51.7 51.9 52.1 53 55.8 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
24.4 33.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
19.1
16.8
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
98
85.6
80.1
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
144 161.4 163.6 165.1 168 170.4 171.7 175 175.9 178 179 179.6 181.8 184 186.8 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
117.3 133.3 146.6 156.4 157 159.4 160.7 161.4 162 163.1 164.7 167.8 171 172 174 179 180.2 ~ 160 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.2 99.2 100.4 100.4 103 103.5 103.5 107.5 111.5 112.7 114.9 119 120 129.2 131 138 146.6 148.2 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48 48.4 51.5 53.5 54.8 54.9 55.5 57.8 58.6 59.7 60.3 61.8 63.9 64.9 65.5 66.9 68.3 70.8 70.9 72.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33.7 48 48.9 51.3 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32 43.6 46.3 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
12
15.7
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
169
157
168
175.7
152.8
97.9
166.2
153.9
128.6
162.7
127.1
158.5
165.4
170.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
175
176
167.8
179
171.3
133.5
135.4
165.4
171
177.4
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Last Epoch118.19379.756.1
Skull & Bones60544231
Helldivers 262.547.544.433.4
Enshrouded3732.426.321.3
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown272227219
Ready or Not129.697.285.164
The Finals110.180.371.451.3
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora34312719
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 202370634841
EA Sports WRC65.751.834.430
Alan Wake 231.227.924.8
Lords of the Fallen44.737.230.226.1
Total War Pharaoh106.16248.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage59534431
EA Sports FC 2473.2
Counter-Strike 2170.112571.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty52.639.834.228.7
Lies of P82.172.962.855.7
The Crew Motorfest55504035
Starfield41.43425.723.1
Armored Core 680.16353.741.8
Immortals of Aveum31.528.526.5
Atlas Fallen63.656.340.2
Baldur's Gate 354.842.137.737.2
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart60.742.635.128.5
F1 23108886419
Diablo 494.275.269.357.2
Star Wars Jedi Survivor30262424
Dead Island 210689.770.952.1
The Last of Us47.33933.8
Resident Evil 4 Remake49.535.630.37.41
Company of Heroes 376.3675251.4
Sons of the Forest50.131.530.828.9
Atomic Heart71.454.331.624.5
Returnal42393625
Hogwarts Legacy5440.530.918.6
Dead Space Remake35.223.220.717.6
The Witcher 3 v4.0098.179.964.749.4
High On Life98.360.247.339.3
Need for Speed Unbound67.358.445.635.2
Spider-Man Miles Morales63.559.351.443.4
A Plague Tale Requiem28.823.219.917.1
The Quarry85.5564636
F1 22126106792495.9
Vampire Bloodhunt1049795
Ghostwire Tokyo75.168666335.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands755542
Cyberpunk 2077 1.665513832185.57
Elex 2464541
GRID Legends116.6938162
Elden Ring494745
Dying Light 23832
Rainbow Six Extraction989466
God of War50.6483826
Halo Infinite73.146.244.6
Farming Simulator 22123.1105.390.1
Battlefield 204263.557.747.9
Forza Horizon 5154877728
Riders Republic144806155
Guardians of the Galaxy96747332
Back 4 Blood247138112103
Far Cry 69166605250
Alan Wake Remastered91.970.664.2
New World9565.260.249.2
Deathloop10963.451.738.1
F1 2021227137111523515
Monster Hunter Stories 295.691.478.460.5
Days Gone78.469.951.637.320.8
Mass Effect Legendary Edition96.878.243.5
Resident Evil Village73.566.657.241.617.4
Outriders53.25147.230.622.9
Hitman 3159.410274684421.4
Cyberpunk 2077 1.06439342816.44.68
Immortals Fenyx Rising1067054493415
Yakuza Like a Dragon57.155.350.737.119.1
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla9958322422
Dirt 51417053423416.9
Watch Dogs Legion8066572619
FIFA 21186180175166112
Star Wars Squadrons16414514393.850.6
Mafia Definitive Edition6458.940.120.4
Serious Sam 463.548.939.129.9
Crysis Remastered99.352.235.924.413.8
Flight Simulator 2020107.447.834.524.7
Horizon Zero Dawn9975625646
Death Stranding79.273.67138.819
F1 20202011181007459
Gears Tactics25312683604021.6
Doom Eternal133107
Hunt Showdown73.567.74219.5
Fall Guys10811892.4
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order86.68071.652.625.3
Need for Speed Heat64.762.561.147.123.3
GRID 201918110188402511.4
Borderlands 3111.77553392615.6
Control62.145.129.113.3
Rage 281.369.868.84314.2
Anno 18008860.331.222.912.4
The Division 21328268513416
Far Cry New Dawn11883776652
Metro Exodus1236346372917.2
Apex Legends12610089.868.437.1
Battlefield V92.889.483.265.735
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1127161554223
Strange Brigade24811592805531
Far Cry 51177267634819
X-Plane 11.11107927561
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark11164463318
Dota 2 Reborn14213012211562
The Witcher 3208137794529
GTA V172160116604541
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
18
39
18
4
31
60
13
8
47
49
4
23
49
24
3
12
26
6
1
29
6
4

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 23. 04:45:53

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.04s ... 0.041s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.042s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.043s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.043s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.043s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.043s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.044s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.044s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.044s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.044s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.044s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#23 composed specs +0s ... 0.045s

#24 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#25 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 10592 +0.028s ... 0.074s

#27 got single benchmarks 10592 +0.212s ... 0.286s

#28 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.286s

#29 min, max, avg, median took s +0.973s ... 1.259s

#30 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.26s

#31 Got 1089 rows for game benchmarks. +0.244s ... 1.504s

#32 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.504s

#33 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.08s ... 1.584s

#34 benchmarks composed for output. +5.129s ... 6.714s

#35 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.01s ... 6.723s

#36 return log +0s ... 6.723s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU graphics card

华硕 VivoBook 14x OLED K3405 评测

华硕 VivoBook 14X OLED K3405 笔记本电脑评测:配备酷睿 i5-13500H 和生动的 2.8K OLED 显示屏的轻薄型多媒体笔记本电脑

新款华硕 VivoBook 14X OLED K3405 带来了几项显著的改进,包括英特尔酷睿 i5-13500H 和 2.8K OLED 显示屏。VivoBook 14X OLED 希望作为一款功能强大的多媒体笔记本电脑受到追捧,并在很大程度上实现了这一目标。不过,华硕的一些选择,如使用现已老化的 35 W Nvid...
Intel Core i5-13500H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
联想超薄7 Pro X笔记本电脑评测。华硕VivoBook 14的替代品

联想超薄7 Pro X笔记本电脑评测。华硕VivoBook 14的替代品

AMD版本比英特尔版本便宜几百美元,而只是稍微慢一些。由于GeForce RTX 3050 GPU和3K显示器仍然是标准配置,因此对大多数用户来说,这是一个更好的选择。...
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 14.50" | 1.6 kg
联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro X笔记本电脑评测

联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro X笔记本电脑评论。配备NvidiaGeForce RTX的优雅创意笔记本电脑

我们对联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro X的评论可以简单总结如下。这款次笔记本结构紧凑,提供顶级水平的性能。即使没有OLED,它也提供了一个非常好的屏幕,还能确保长时间的电池运行。...
Intel Core i7-12700H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 14.50" | 1.5 kg
华硕Vivobook Pro 16X笔记本电脑回顾。拥有顶级OLED显示屏的华硕系统

华硕Vivobook Pro 16X笔记本电脑回顾。拥有顶级OLED显示屏的华硕系统

华硕Vivobook Pro 16X提供了强大的性能和一个梦幻般的显示屏--这就是华硕Vivobook Pro 16X的特点。OLED显示屏经过Pantone验证,色彩特别准确。由于其专用的GPU,这款多媒体笔记本电脑涵盖了从游戏到专业视频或照片编辑等广泛的使用情况。...
Intel Core i7-11370H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2 kg
宏碁Swift X 14 (2022) 在笔记本电脑的审查

宏碁Swift X 14笔记本电脑评论与RTX 3050。挑战不足的i5-1240P

宏碁Swift X 14是一款轻巧的1.4公斤(约3磅)笔记本电脑,配备NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050,电池寿命长,16:10显示屏,系统性能高。然而,在电池运行中,图形性能仍然完全崩溃,在这种情况下,即使是快速的SSD和清脆的键盘也无济于事。...
Intel Core i5-1240P | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.4 kg

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7: AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Ryzen 5 6600H性能首次亮相。联想IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7笔记本电脑评测

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420: Intel Core i7-12700H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » 戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420笔记本电脑评论。适用于预算有限的电力用户

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC: Intel Core i7-12650H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  Review » 华硕TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC笔记本评测。1440p、165赫兹和全P3颜色,价格低于1000美元

Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388: Intel Core i5-11320H, 16.10", 1.8 kg
  Review » 宏碁Swift X 16评论。RTX 3050在多媒体笔记本电脑中大放异彩

Dell Inspiron 15 Plus: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  Review » 戴尔Inspiron 15 Plus笔记本电脑评测。接近于完美的全能型产品

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 华硕Vivobook Pro 14 OLED在审查。潘多拉验证的笔记本电脑包含了大量的处理能力

Dell G15 5510: Intel Core i5-10500H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » 戴尔G15 5510笔记本电脑回顾。配备RTX 3050的经济型游戏笔记本

Dell XPS 17 9720: Intel Core i7-12700H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » 戴尔XPS 17 9720评测--高端多媒体笔记本电脑开始显示其年龄

Gigabyte G5 GD: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  Review » 技嘉G5 GD在回顾。经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑,没有Windows

Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  Review » 华硕VivoBook 15 Pro OLED回顾。负担得起的多媒体笔记本电脑,性能高

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ: Intel Core i5-11300H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  Review » 宏碁Nitro 5 AN517-53评论:经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑与RTX 3050

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 16Z90SP

HP Envy 17-cw0000ng: Intel Core i7-1355U, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cw0000ng

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC, i5-12500H: Intel Core i5-12500H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC, i5-12500H

VAIO FH15: Intel Core i7-13700H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » VAIO FH15

MSI Katana GF66 12UCK: Intel Core i7-12650H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 12UCK

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-54UH: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-54UH

HP Victus 15-fa0054ns: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa0054ns

Acer Aspire 7 A715-76G, i5-12450H RTX 3050: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 7 A715-76G, i5-12450H RTX 3050

Asus Vivobook 16X K3605ZC: Intel Core i7-12650H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16X K3605ZC

Medion Erazer Crawler E30: Intel Core i5-12500H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Crawler E30

HP Victus 15-fa1000: Intel Core i5-13500H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa1000

MSI GF63 12UC: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 12UC

Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8, i5-13420H RTX 3050: Intel Core i5-13420H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8, i5-13420H RTX 3050

HP Victus 16-e0087ns: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-e0087ns

Lenovo Legion 5 15ARH7H: AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15ARH7H

HP Victus 15-fa0000TX: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa0000TX

MSI GF63 Thin 11UC: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 11UC

Asus Vivobook 14X K3405VC: Intel Core i9-13900H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14X K3405VC

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602ZC, i7-12650H: Intel Core i7-12650H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602ZC, i7-12650H

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 D3500QC-L1456W: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 D3500QC-L1456W

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7, i5-12500H RXT 3050: Intel Core i5-12500H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7, i5-12500H. RXT 3050

Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K6502, i7-13650HX RTX 3050: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K6502, i7-13650HX RTX 3050

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-47: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-47

Asus Zenbook 14X UX3404VC, i7-13700H: Intel Core i7-13700H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14X UX3404VC, i7-13700H

MSI Katana GF66 12UC: Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 12UC

HP Victus 16-d1021ns: Intel Core i7-12700H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d1021ns

HP Victus 16-e1021ns: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-e1021ns

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602ZC: Intel Core i5-12450H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602ZC

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-79TD: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-79TD

Gigabyte G5 GE: Intel Core i5-12500H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte G5 GE

Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K6502, i9-11900H RTX 3050: Intel Core i9-11900H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K6502, i9-11900H RTX 3050

LG Gram 17 2023 17Z90R: Intel Core i7-1360P, 17.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 2023 17Z90R

Asus Zenbook 14X UX3404VC-M3145X: Intel Core i9-13900H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14X UX3404VC-M3145X

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-47-R79X: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-47-R79X

Asus Vivobook Pro 16 K6602HC, i9-11900H RTX 3050: Intel Core i9-11900H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 16 K6602HC, i9-11900H RTX 3050

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QC-K6001T: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QC-K6001T

Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K6502, i5-12450H RTX 3050: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K6502, i5-12450H RTX 3050

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7, i5-12450H RXT 3050: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7, i5-12450H RXT 3050

MSI GF63 Thin 11UC-680NL: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 11UC-680NL

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HC-HX007W: Intel Core i5-11400H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HC-HX007W

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB-HN119W: AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB-HN119W

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M6400, 6800H RTX 3050: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M6400, 6800H RTX 3050

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC-HN004: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC-HN004

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC, i5-12450H: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC, i5-12450H

Dell G15 5511-5100BLK: Intel Core i5-11260H, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Dell G15 5511-5100BLK

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7, R5 6600HS RTX 3050: AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7, R5 6600HS RTX 3050

Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K6502, i7-12700H RTX 3050: Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K6502, i7-12700H RTX 3050

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 ProX 14IAH7, i5-12500H RTX 3050: Intel Core i5-12500H, 14.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 ProX 14IAH7, i5-12500H RTX 3050

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-521S: Intel Core i5-12500H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-521S

Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K3500PC-L1293: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K3500PC-L1293

Asus ROG Strix G15 G513IC-HN100W: AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G15 G513IC-HN100W

MSI Katana GF66 11UC-809NL: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 11UC-809NL

MSI Prestige 14 A12UC-006: Intel Core i7-1260P, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A12UC-006

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M6500QC-L1010W: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M6500QC-L1010W

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE: Intel Core i7-12700H, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 ProX 14IAH7-82TK0079GE: Intel Core i7-12700H, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 ProX 14IAH7-82TK0079GE

HP Victus 16-e1007ns: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-e1007ns

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-781E: Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-781E

Acer Aspire 7 A715-51G-529E: Intel Core i5-1240P, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 7 A715-51G-529E

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420: Intel Core i7-12700H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420

MSI Prestige 14 A12UC-228: Intel Core i5-1240P, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A12UC-228

HP Victus 16-e0031ns: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-e0031ns

HP Victus 15-fb0009AX: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fb0009AX

Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6H-82QJ0000BR: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6H-82QJ0000BR

HP Victus 15-fa0011TX: Intel Core i5-12500H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa0011TX

Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R0FB: AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R0FB

Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6-82K0008LMH: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6-82K0008LMH

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7: AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M3500QC-L1297W: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M3500QC-L1297W

Asus VivoBook Pro 16X N7600PC-L2010W: Intel Core i7-11370H, 16.10", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 16X N7600PC-L2010W

MSI Katana GF66 12UC-077: Intel Core i5-12500H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 12UC-077

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 ProX 14ARH7-82TL000BGE: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 ProX 14ARH7-82TL000BGE

MSI Prestige 14 A12UC, i7-1280P: Intel Core i7-1280P, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A12UC, i7-1280P

Gigabyte G7 GD: Intel Core i5-11400H, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte G7 GD

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ACH6, 5800H RTX 3050: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ACH6, 5800H RTX 3050

HP Victus 16-e0033ns: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-e0033ns

Acer Aspire 7 A715-42G-R8BV: AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 7 A715-42G-R8BV

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QC-K2175: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QC-K2175

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH6-82L5009DMH: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH6-82L5009DMH

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7-82S9006JGE: Intel Core i5-12500H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7-82S9006JGE

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X M7600QC-L2002T: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 16X M7600QC-L2002T

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M3500QC-L1063: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M3500QC-L1063

HP Victus 16-e0350nd: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-e0350nd

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QC-HZ018: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QC-HZ018

HP Spectre x360 16-f0035: Intel Core i7-11390H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 16-f0035

MSI GF63 Thin 11UC-447XES: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 11UC-447XES

MSI Prestige 15 A12UC: Intel Core i7-1280P, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A12UC

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-58BN: Intel Core i5-12500H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-58BN

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 ProX 14ARH7-82TL0042GE: AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 ProX 14ARH7-82TL0042GE

MSI Creator M16 A12UC-284: Intel Core i7-12700H, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Creator M16 A12UC-284

Dell XPS 17 9720: Intel Core i7-12700H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 17 9720

HP Victus 16-e0029ns: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-e0029ns

HP Envy 15-ep1008ns: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep1008ns

HP Victus 16-d0018ns: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d0018ns

Lenovo Legion 5 15ITH6, i7-11800H RTX 3050: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15ITH6, i7-11800H RTX 3050

Asus VivoBook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007W: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007W

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 Pro 16: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 Pro 16

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IHU6-82K100QHGE: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IHU6-82K100QHGE

HP Envy 14-eb1035nr: Intel Core i7-11390H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 14-eb1035nr

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB-HN256T: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB-HN256T

Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RC

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC: Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC: Intel Core i7-12650H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC

Dell Vostro 15 7510, i5-11400H RTX 3050: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 15 7510, i5-11400H RTX 3050

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M3500QC-KJ161T: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M3500QC-KJ161T

HP Victus 16-d0021ns: Intel Core i7-11800H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d0021ns

Asus Vivobook Pro 14X M7400, 5800H 3050: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 14X M7400, 5800H 3050

Acer Aspire 7 A715-42G-R69L: AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 7 A715-42G-R69L

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec2010AX: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec2010AX

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ACH6, 5600H RTX 3050: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ACH6, 5600H RTX 3050

HP Victus 16-e0914ng: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-e0914ng

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZC-LD027W: Intel Core i7-12700H, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZC-LD027W

Asus Vivobook Pro 14X M7400QC-KM018: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 14X M7400QC-KM018

HP Victus 16-e0026ns: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-e0026ns

MSI Katana GF66 11UC-231ES: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 11UC-231ES

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X N7600PC-L2012R: Intel Core i5-11300H, 16.10", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 16X N7600PC-L2012R

Dell G15 5510-5889BLK: Intel Core i5-10500H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Dell G15 5510-5889BLK

Dell G15 5510, i5-10200H RTX 3050: Intel Core i5-10200H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Dell G15 5510, i5-10200H RTX 3050

Dell G15 5510-5964BLK: Intel Core i5-10200H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell G15 5510-5964BLK

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro X14: Intel Core i7-11370H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro X14

HP Spectre x360 16-f0008ca: Intel Core i7-11390H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 16-f0008ca

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-dk2002TX: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 15-dk2002TX

Asus VivoBook Pro 14X N7400, i5-11300H RTX 3050: Intel Core i5-11300H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 14X N7400, i5-11300H RTX 3050

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-77QK: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-77QK

Asus VivoBook Pro 14X N7400PC-KM012T: Intel Core i7-11370H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 14X N7400PC-KM012T

MSI Katana GF76 11UC-080ES: Intel Core i7-11800H, 17.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF76 11UC-080ES

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH6-82L5006TGE: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH6-82L5006TGE

Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R0SG: AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R0SG

Asus VivoBook Pro 14X M7400QC, 5600H RTX 3050: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 14X M7400QC, 5600H RTX 3050

MSI Katana GF66 11UC-072XES: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 11UC-072XES

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X M7600, 5800H 3050: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 16X M7600, 5800H 3050

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M3500QC-L1062: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M3500QC-L1062

Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R5EM: AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R5EM

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ITH6H, i7-11800H RTX 3050: Intel Core i7-11800H, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ITH6H, i7-11800H RTX 3050

Asus VivoBook Pro 14X N7400PC-KM142W: Intel Core i7-11370H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 14X N7400PC-KM142W

HP Victus 16-d0108TX: Intel Core i7-11800H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d0108TX

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QC-K2123T: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QC-K2123T

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 K3500PC-L1009T: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 K3500PC-L1009T

Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062

MSI Summit E16 Flip Evo A11UCT-028: Intel Core i7-1195G7, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E16 Flip Evo A11UCT-028

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 D3500QC-L1103T: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 D3500QC-L1103T

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-54-706P: Intel Core i7-11800H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN517-54-706P

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-NH.QCLSI.001: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-NH.QCLSI.001

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 K3500PC, i7-11370H RTX 3050: Intel Core i7-11370H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 K3500PC, i7-11370H RTX 3050

Gigabyte G5 GD: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte G5 GD

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IHU6-82K1002QGE: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IHU6-82K1002QGE

Asus VivoBook Pro 16X N7600PC: Intel Core i7-11370H, 16.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 16X N7600PC

HP Victus 16-e0011ns: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-e0011ns

Asus Vivobook Pro 14X M7400, 5900HX 3050: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 14X M7400, 5900HX 3050

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-55-53E5: Intel Core i5-10300H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-55-53E5

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HC-HX008T: Intel Core i7-11800H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HC-HX008T

Dell G15 5515, 5600H RTX 3050: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Dell G15 5515, 5600H RTX 3050

HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2023ur: Intel Core i7-11370H, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2023ur

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401, 5900HX: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401, 5900HX

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-56HH: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-57-56HH

HP Victus 16-d0146ng: Intel Core i5-11400H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d0146ng

Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7PP: AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7PP

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610: Intel Core i7-11800H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QC

HP Victus 16-d0057ng: Intel Core i5-11400H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-d0057ng

Dell G15 5510-Y4V8G: Intel Core i7-10870H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Dell G15 5510-Y4V8G

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH6, R7 5800H RTX 3050: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH6, R7 5800H RTX 3050

MSI Katana GF66 11UC-011NL: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 11UC-011NL

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QС-HX052T: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QС-HX052T

MSI Katana GF66 11UC-228: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 11UC-228

MSI Katana GF66 11UC-093: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 11UC-093

Dell XPS 17 9720: Intel Core i7-12700H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
   » 戴尔XPS 17 9730:宣布配备英特尔猛禽湖H处理器和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4000显卡的高级笔记本电脑

Asus VivoBook Pro 16X OLED N7600PC-L2026X: Intel Core i7-11370H, 16.00", 2 kg
   » 华硕Vivobook Pro 16X的评论。有一些弱点的全能型产品

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7: AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
   » Ryzen 5 6600H仅比Ryzen 5 5600H快5%,以在许多方面感觉是一个重塑的品牌

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-08-13)