Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc Graphics 130V

Intel Arc 130V

IntelArc Graphics 130V是一款集成图形适配器,适用于较低端的 Intel Lunar Lake处理器采用的集成图形适配器。它是 Arc 7iGPU 的直接继承者;它拥有 7 个 Xe² 架构内核,运行频率高达 1,850 MHz,并有 7 个光线追踪单元可供选择。

它完全支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate,而且 iGPU 还支持一长串流行视频编解码器的硬件解码,如 h.266 VVC、h.265 HEVC、h.264 AVC、AV1 和 VP9。它可以通过 HDMI 2.1、eDP 1.5 和 DP 2.1 同时驱动三个 SUHD 4320p 显示器。

与 Meteor Lake 一样,英特尔利用其 Foveros 技术打造 Lunar Lake 芯片,这意味着 iGPU 和 CPU 内核位于不同的芯片上,相互堆叠或相邻。

性能

根据我们内部 140V 的测试结果,我们预计 130V 的速度与 Radeon 780M在低图形设置下以 1080p 处理大多数 2023 和一些 2024 游戏的帧速率。

功耗

Lunar Lake 处理器的功耗数据相对适中,约为 20 W 至 30 W,其中最多约一半的功耗由集成 GPU 承担。

Gen13 / Arc Xe2 Series

Arc 140V 8 @ 2.05 GHz
Arc 130V 7 @ 1.85 GHz
CodenameLunar Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe² Battlemage
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines7 - unified
Raytracing Cores7
Core Speed1850 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Man. Technology3 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesSUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VVC/VP9/AV1 decoding
Date of Announcement24.09.2024
PredecessorArc 7-Core
CPU in Arc 130VGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W300 MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W300 MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W300 MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W300 MHz1850 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1850 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.7 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.0639 -98%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.23 -13%
3.29 -12%
3.35 -10%
3.35 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.4 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.41 -9%
3.43 -8%
3.49 -6%
3.52 -6%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.73
3.73 0%
3.73 0%
3.74 0%
3.82 2%
3.85 3%
3.94 6%
3.95 6%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.07 9%
4.08 9%
...
22.7 509%
max:
33.3 793%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 452     avg: 479     median: 479 (3%)     max: 506 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 477     avg: 580     median: 589 (4%)     max: 659 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 2413     avg: 2666     median: 2670 (6%)     max: 2877 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
23603 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 12207     avg: 12978     median: 13324 (5%)     max: 13402 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6913     avg: 7647     median: 7784 (12%)     max: 8007 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 7536     avg: 8373     median: 8463 (8%)     max: 8755 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 195491     avg: 236844     median: 251095 (28%)     max: 263945 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3415     avg: 3655     median: 3652 (9%)     max: 3850 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3148     avg: 3371     median: 3388 (7%)     max: 3543 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -97%
...
3139 -7%
3155 -6%
3200 -5%
3219 -5%
3255 -3%
3269 -3%
3306 -2%
3324 -1%
3364 0%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3371
3430 2%
3492 4%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 4%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 6%
3601 7%
3650 8%
3689 9%
3719 10%
3799 13%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 591%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44063 1207%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
434157 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
149590 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 28090     avg: 30018     median: 30375 (29%)     max: 31232 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 42128     avg: 47415     median: 48426.5 (12%)     max: 50680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 29054     avg: 30879     median: 30878.5 (29%)     max: 32703 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 38271     avg: 40212     median: 40211.5 (15%)     max: 42152 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 8815     avg: 10160     median: 10260 (12%)     max: 10582 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8129     avg: 9709     median: 9765 (7%)     max: 10312 Points
171.8 -98%
...
8565 -12%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
8656 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
8781 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
8851 -9%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
9183 -5%
9448 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
9569 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9591 -1%
AMD FirePro W7170M
9708 0%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
9709
9840 1%
9910 2%
9912 2%
9950 2%
AMD Radeon 680M
10003 3%
10005 3%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
10020 3%
10153 5%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
10259 6%
...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 603%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 1237%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 33968     avg: 37925     median: 37924.5 (11%)     max: 41881 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 31489     avg: 35818     median: 35817.5 (20%)     max: 40146 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
33810 -6%
34027 -5%
34070 -5%
34680 -3%
34951 -2%
35209 -2%
35665 0%
35805 0%
35807 0%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
35818
36214 1%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36391 2%
36405 2%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 3%
37644 5%
38502 7%
38910 9%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
39191 9%
39213 9%
...
132443 270%
max:
173912 386%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
32742 Points (36%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
29194 -11%
29690 -9%
29851 -9%
30785 -6%
31017 -5%
31647 -3%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
31699 -3%
32434 -1%
AMD Radeon 610M
32659 0%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
32742
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
33160 1%
33386 2%
35208 8%
35662 9%
36346 11%
36878 13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
37669 15%
39066 19%
AMD Radeon 660M
41139 26%
...
68868 110%
max:
87172 166%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 34075     avg: 35023     median: 35022.5 (46%)     max: 35970 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
24.8 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
64.1 fps (16%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
3.6 fps (1%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
28.2 fps (5%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
14.5 fps (4%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
51.4 fps (14%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.5 fps (0%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
22.8 fps (9%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
52.2 fps (8%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
56.2 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
70.4 fps (19%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
6.7 fps (1%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
30.9 fps (5%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
16 fps (3%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
72.1 fps (8%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
4.5 fps (1%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
44.9 fps (7%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
74.3 fps (8%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
51.1 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
6.9 fps (1%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
9.7 fps (3%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
102 fps (11%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
4.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
29.8 fps (10%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
17.5 fps (9%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
21.6 fps (6%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
6.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
4.3 fps (3%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
42.1 fps (6%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
3.3 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
18.7 fps (8%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
11.5 fps (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 15120     avg: 15997     median: 15997 (11%)     max: 16874 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 104.73     avg: 116.1     median: 116.1 (12%)     max: 127.43 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 122.5     avg: 143.6     median: 142.1 (8%)     max: 175.11 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 23.5     avg: 24.9     median: 24.9 (9%)     max: 26.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 53.4     avg: 57.6     median: 57.6 (10%)     max: 61.8 fps
3.3 -94%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -16%
48.6 -16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -14%
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
50 -13%
51.3 -11%
AMD Radeon 680M
51.7 -10%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 -9%
56 -3%
57.2 -1%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
57.6
61.4 7%
62.7 9%
62.7 9%
62.8 9%
62.9 9%
63.8 11%
64.7 12%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 13%
65.5 14%
...
530 820%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 141.2     avg: 144.9     median: 144.9 (11%)     max: 148.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
107.4 fps (10%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
157.5 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
218.1 fps (9%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
378.8 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 356.3     median: 315 (8%)     max: 1528 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 73.6     median: 73.6 (13%)     max: 143.6 fps
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
min: 23879     avg: 25766     median: 25671 (7%)     max: 27095 points
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
min: 19700     avg: 27525     median: 27369 (7%)     max: 34432 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 678     avg: 838     median: 837.5 (3%)     max: 997 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1538     avg: 2118     median: 2118 (4%)     max: 2698 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 5886     avg: 5937     median: 5937 (5%)     max: 5988 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.5     avg: 33.6     median: 35.4 (5%)     max: 37.5 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 38.7     avg: 43.2     median: 43.8 (12%)     max: 47.4 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.1     avg: 41.2     median: 41.9 (5%)     max: 46 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3739     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.593 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
28 dB(A) (40%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
33.4
low 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
8.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
7.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
66 72.6 74.1 74.3 80.6 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56 61.7 64.3 66.1 74.3 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41 47.1 49.1 52.1 55.2 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 14.8 16.1 16.4 18.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
162.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
103.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
101.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
52.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
79.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
62.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
99.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
33.6 36.2 38.3 38.5 39.3 40.9 41.1 41.2 41.6 43 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.2 28.2 30.5 31.3 31.9 32.6 32.8 33 33.2 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.5 23.7 25 26.5 26.9 27.8 28 28.5 28.6 29.2 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.8 21.8 23.1 23.9 24.9 24.9 25.1 25.4 25.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
59
53.2
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
8.6
7.9
Steam Deck 1280x800
52.4
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
25.6
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
20.1
21.7
20.1
16.5
22
17.2
19.4
22.8
16.4
low 1920x1080
27.3 29.9 29.9 31.7 31.9 32.6 36.1 36.6 37.6 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.9 24.6 24.7 25 25.5 26.2 27.5 29.6 29.6 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.3 20.8 21.5 22.9 23.1 23.8 24 25.8 25.9 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.6 20.4 21.3 22.5 22.8 23.3 24.9 25.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
49.7
47.7
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
32.6
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
91.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
151.2
low 1920x1080
61.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
101.7
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
176.4 178.3 192.6 192.9 194.2 205 211 ~ 193 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.3 70.7 72.2 73.6 73.8 75.1 76.7 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.2 58.3 58.4 60.3 61.5 62 62.2 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.6 48.2 50.6 51.3 51.4 51.8 51.8 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
73 80 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41 45 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37 41 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
34.8 38.4 39.7 41.2 43.3 44.4 44.5 47.4 49.6 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.3 31 31.6 32.6 33.5 34.1 36.3 36.7 38.4 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.3 27.1 27.7 29.2 29.7 29.8 31.5 32.8 38.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
73.4 73.4 73.5 74.6 75.2 81.2 83.2 85.6 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.1 40.8 41.1 41.3 41.4 42.4 43.9 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.4 27.9 28.3 29.2 30 30 30.3 31 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
90.9 91.2 94.1 94.2 94.5 97.8 98 100.3 102.6 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
78.9 82.8 84.1 84.4 85 85.4 86.8 87.4 97.1 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.3 58 67.6 75.7 75.8 76.8 78.5 78.6 84.2 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.2 65.3 72.6 77.6 78.1 78.1 79.5 82.9 84.3 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
149.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
100  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
53.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
66.8
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
115.9 141.9 148.2 150.4 151.2 151.5 151.8 153 154 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
103.6 111.1 120 131.1 132.4 133.6 144.1 145.2 146.4 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.3 44.2 51.4 56.9 57.9 58.1 60.2 62.8 65.8 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.8 20.8 21.1 22 22.7 23.6 23.9 24.5 25.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
135.1
112.3
86.4
108.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
120.3
147.2
132.1
108.3
115.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2567.153.443.8
Until Dawn27.618.612.39.68
God of War Ragnarök18.718.516.215.7
Final Fantasy XVI14.713.611.711.5
Space Marine 216.41514.713.2
Star Wars Outlaws8.567.3
F1 2474644915
Senua's Saga Hellblade 213.211.79.12
Ghost of Tsushima22.520.817.813.6
Horizon Forbidden West25.522.116.315.1
Dragon's Dogma 217.613.1
Helldivers 233.425.623.522
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown162.6103.8101.5
Ready or Not52.540.826.519.9
The Finals79.662.955.344.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora12118.77.1
Alan Wake 215.112.611.2
Lords of the Fallen17.116.114.311.4
Total War Pharaoh99.855.53125.4
Assassin's Creed Mirage333229
Counter-Strike 250.747.128.321.4
Cyberpunk 207739312724
Baldur's Gate 333262322
F1 2291.281.359.718
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands61.143.627.221.2
Strange Brigade193736050
Far Cry 577433936
X-Plane 11.11433430
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark78422923.4
Dota 2 Reborn96867275
The Witcher 3149.910053.423.2
GTA V1461305623
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
12
7
9
3
13
10
6
2
19
9
3
19
3
2
1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $699.00
    HP OmniBook X Flip 14 2-in-1 Laptop, Laptop Touchscreen 14" WUXGA IPS, Intel 8-core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc 130V GPU, 16GB RAM 512GB SSD, Thunderbolt 4, Windows 11 Home with Stylus Pen
  • $619.00
    Acer Aspire 14" FHD Touchscreen Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel ARC 130V,16GB DDR5 RAM, 512GB SSD, AI Copilot+ Business Laptop PC, Win 11 Home, Wi-Fi 6E, w/HDMI Cable/Pen,with Lifetime Office
  • $649.99
    Acer Aspire 14" FHD Touchscreen Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel ARC 130V,16GB DDR5 RAM, 512GB SSD, AI Copilot+ Business Laptop PC, Win 11 Pro, Wi-Fi 6E, w/HDMI Cable/Pen,with Lifetime Office
  • $599.99
    Acer Aspire 14 AI Copilot Touchscreen Laptop | Intel Ultra 5 226V 8-Core CPU | Intel Arc Graphics 130V | 16GB LPDDR5 RAM | 256GB PCIe SSD | 14" WUXGA Display | Backlit Keyboard | Windows 11
  • $649.99
    HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop, 16" WUXGA Touchscreen, Intel Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V, 16GB Ram, 512GB SSD, Windows 11 Home (Renewed)

v1.35
log 23. 18:57:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jul 2026 05:30:55 +0200 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.021s ... 0.024s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.025s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12695 +0.037s ... 0.062s

#9 got single benchmarks 12695 +0.034s ... 0.096s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +2.698s ... 2.794s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 2.794s

#13 Got 336 rows for game benchmarks. +0.056s ... 2.85s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.85s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.021s ... 2.871s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +0.312s ... 3.183s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.408s ... 3.591s

#18 return log +0s ... 3.591s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc Graphics 130V graphics card

GMKtec NucBox K17

GMKtec NucBox K17 评测:搭载英特尔酷睿Ultra处理器的迷你电脑究竟能有多安静

GMKtec NucBox K17 融合了英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 226V 处理器、静音散热系统以及高能效特性。在本篇评测中,我们将探讨这款紧凑型迷你电脑在日常使用、高负载运行以及多媒体和办公应用中的表现,并分析其与竞品相比的优缺点。
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 461 g
联想 ThinkPad E14 7 代

联想ThinkPad E14 7代评测--Lunar Lake带来更长的电池续航时间,但也有取舍

我们测试了配备英特尔 Lunar Lake 芯片的 ThinkPad E14 7 代,它的电池续航时间有所改善,但 CPU 性能落后,维护选项也受到限制。这就提出了一个问题:箭湖芯片是否是更好的整体选择?
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, Arc 130V, 14", 1.4 kg
三星Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 评测--得益于 Lunar Lake 技术,它终于成为Apple MacBook Air 的竞争对手了吗?

三星Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 评测--得益于 Lunar Lake 技术,它终于成为Apple MacBook Air 的竞争对手了吗?

三星现在为其 14 英寸超薄笔记本电脑配备了英特尔高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器,从而提高了运行速度。不过,价格依然居高不下,三星在 OLED 面板领域的市场份额也在慢慢流失。
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 14", 1.2 kg
激发灵感的千克科技--宏碁 TravelMate P6 商务笔记本电脑评测

激发灵感的千克科技--宏碁 TravelMate P6 商务笔记本电脑评测

宏碁(Acer)的新款 TravelMate P6 重量轻,基本无声,电池续航时间也非常出色。这款笔记本可以轻松应对数个工作日的工作,而无需为充电线缆费心,同时这款小巧的商务笔记本还能提供可观的性能。
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 14", 1 kg
英特尔帝国卷土重来,电池续航时间长达 21 小时:联想ThinkPad T14s第六代笔记本电脑评测

英特尔帝国卷土重来,电池续航时间长达 21 小时:联想ThinkPad T14s第六代笔记本电脑评测

高通、AMD 和英特尔--联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 是一款可以配置所有可用选项的笔记本电脑。我们今天测试的这款英特尔 Lunar Lake 型号可能是迄今为止最好的,它在出色的日常性能和效率之间达到了理想的平衡。
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, Arc 130V, 14", 1.3 kg

Acer Aspire 14 AI N24Q14: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 宏碁 Aspire 14 AI 评测:基本的家用和办公笔记本电脑

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 华硕 Vivobook S 14 OLED 评测:得益于月亮湖技术,价格实惠、更安静、更持久

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 笔记本电脑评测--得益于英特尔月亮湖技术的大型 OLED 可转换笔记本电脑

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 宏碁 Swift 14 AI 评测:首款配备 Arc Graphics 130V 的笔记本电脑

Acer TravelMate X4 14 AI TMX414-51: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate X4 14 AI TMX414-51

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14ILL10: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14ILL10

Acer Swift Go 14 AI SFG14-75 : Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 AI SFG14-75

HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fm0000: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fm0000

Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-53M: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-53M

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8, Ultra 5 238V: Intel Core Ultra 5 238V, 13.80", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8, Ultra 5 238V

Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA, Ultra 5 226V: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA, Ultra 5 226V

Microsoft Surface Pro 11: Intel Core Ultra 5 236V, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 11

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51, Ultra 5 226V: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51, Ultra 5 226V

Acer Aspire 14 AI N24Q14: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI N24Q14

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA

Asus Vivobook S14 Q423: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 Q423

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU

Asus ZenBook S14 OLED UX5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook S14 OLED UX5406SA

GMK NucBox K17: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 0.5 kg
   » GMKtec NucBox K17:搭载英特尔酷睿Ultra 5 226V处理器,运行静如耳语

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 联想为 ThinkPad E14 第 7 代提供现代英特尔 CPU,但只提供老式 AMD CPU

   » 联想的 ThinkPad E14 7 代表明,Lunar Lake 并不自动成为紧凑型笔记本电脑的最佳选择

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 三星为Galaxy Book5 Pro 收取高价,但 16GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘的 1699 欧元价格过高

   » Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 采用的三星 OLED 面板落后于竞争对手

Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614-54-TCO-553Z: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1 kg
   » 隐藏的天赋:Acer TravelMate P6 在日常使用中大放异彩的巧妙功能

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » 最高效率:联想ThinkPad T14s第6代展示了为何月球湖是商务笔记本电脑的完美选择

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (S5606CA) 发布,配备最新英特尔酷睿 Ultra 200H Arrow Lake 移动 CPU 和 Lumina OLED 显示屏

   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (M506KA) 和 Vivobook S 14 (M5406WA) 首次亮相,配备全新 AMD Krackan Point APU 和 OLED 显示屏

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Radeon 8040S *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M
T500 Laptop GPU
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Radeon 660M
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon 540X *
Vega 10
Vega 9
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs *
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter