Notebookcheck Logo

华为MateBook 16s 2023评测 - 多媒体笔记本电脑现在有了更明亮的3:2显示屏

猛禽湖的更新。 通过MateBook 16s,华为提供了采用英特尔处理器的大型多媒体笔记本电脑。现在是2023年,它包括目前猛禽湖H系列的酷睿i9和一个更明亮的显示屏。在我们的测试中,这款来自中国的高档笔记本电脑显示了它的许多优势和很少的弱点。
Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Windows

作为最大的网络设备和移动电子产品制造商之一,华为向消费者提供智能手机、平板电脑、智能手表和笔记本电脑。虽然该制造商的Android 设备在西方世界主要受阻于美国的制裁,但华为的个人电脑和笔记本电脑并没有受到类似的限制。它们配备了当前的Windows版本和英特尔或AMD的强大处理器。我们的测试装置包含一个英特尔酷睿i9-13900H,华为将其安置在一个由铝和玻璃制成的优雅外壳中。华为MateBook 16s主要以全面的声音给我们带来惊喜。除了Apple ,我们已经很久没有在测试中遇到声音这么好的笔记本电脑了。
3:2格式的IPS面板,2.5K分辨率,提供了一个体面的图像。此外,还有TÜV Rheinland(德国技术认证机构)颁发的三份证书,分别是色彩准确性、显示器的低蓝光含量和无闪烁。

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 (MateBook 16s Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR5
Display
16.00 inch 3:2, 2560 x 1680 pixel 191 PPI, BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
321JN1024GB-TX01, 1024 GB 
, 1TB SSD
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset port, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.8 x 351 x 254.9
Battery
84 Wh, 7330 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p, pop-up
Additional features
Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.99 kg
Price
1650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

凭借其轻巧的金属外壳和英特尔酷睿i9,这款16英寸设备是为具有高级品味的客户提供的多媒体笔记本电脑。凭借这一点,华为MateBook s16的直接竞争对手包括联想Yoga 7i三星Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 ,还有Apple MacBook Pro 16 。那些寻找明显更轻的笔记本电脑的人可以在LG Gram 1617 中找到它。你可以在下面的表格中看到我们对这些竞争对手的测试链接:

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
06/2023
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2 kg17.8 mm16.00"2560x1680
86.6 %
06/2023
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.6 kg19 mm16.00"3200x2000
85.8 %
05/2023
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2 kg16.99 mm16.00"1920x1200
86.3 %
05/2023
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.6 %
05/2023
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.6 kg12.5 mm16.00"2880x1800
93.7 %
03/2023
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU
2.2 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234
86.6 %
01/2023
LG Gram 16Z90Q
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg16.8 mm16.00"2560x1600

案例

在MateBook 16s的设计中,华为受到Apple MacBook Pro的启发。但MateBook只是看起来更苗条、更现代。在做工质量方面几乎没有任何弱点。所有部件都紧紧贴合,在试图翘起笔记本时没有任何吱吱作响。显示器很容易移动,可以打开到大约160°的角度。铰链不会因为一些轻微的振动而偏离其位置。不幸的是,键盘已经可以被一些轻度的压力压下去了。 除了按键之外,该设备的所有表面都是由铝或玻璃制成的,这也为多媒体笔记本电脑 提供了高质量的外观。

笔记本电脑的重量约为2公斤(约4.4磅)。除了三星Galaxy Book3和LG Gram 16的轻量级产品外,16英寸笔记本电脑都属于大致相同的重量范围。在厚度方面,竞争对手也相当相似。那些正在寻找真正苗条的16英寸笔记本电脑的人可能需要选择三星设备。

尺寸比较

362.2 mm 250.1 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg355.3 mm 252 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg355 mm 246 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg355.7 mm 248.1 mm 16.8 mm 2.2 kg354 mm 242 mm 16.8 mm 1.2 kg351 mm 254.9 mm 17.8 mm 2 kg355.4 mm 250.4 mm 12.5 mm 1.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

装备

华为MateBook 16s的连接大约符合当前多媒体笔记本电脑的标准。但不幸的是,这里没有SD卡读卡器。两个USB-C端口中只有一个支持ThunderBolt 4,但两个端口都提供DisplayPort和PowerDelivery。通常情况下,两个端口中的一个会被附带的USB-C充电器占据。

2个USB 3.2 Gen1 (USB-A)
2个USB 3.2 Gen1 (USB-A)
USB-C(PowerDelivery和DisplayPort);USB-C(Thunderbolt 4、PowerDelivery和DisplayPort);HDMI接口(HDMI 2.0);3.5毫米立体声耳机接口
USB-C(PowerDelivery和DisplayPort);USB-C(Thunderbolt 4、PowerDelivery和DisplayPort);HDMI接口(HDMI 2.0);3.5毫米立体声耳机接口

沟通

这款笔记本电脑也使用英特尔WiFi AX211作为WiFi模块。虽然它在上升和下载过程中提供了良好的传输速度,但与5GHz无线局域网相比,它在6GHz网络中几乎没有显示任何优势。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1619 (1559min - 1692max) MBit/s +8%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1571 (1517min - 1590max) MBit/s +5%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1498 (704min - 1623max) MBit/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1492 (829min - 1665max) MBit/s 0%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1459 (796min - 1577max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (358 - 1735, n=74, last 2 years)
1339 MBit/s -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=194)
1246 MBit/s -17%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1086 (810min - 1178max) MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1608 (1562min - 1631max) MBit/s +9%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1553 (1528min - 1565max) MBit/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1529 (1477min - 1553max) MBit/s +4%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1476 (1300min - 1531max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (701 - 1789, n=75, last 2 years)
1415 MBit/s -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=194)
1393 MBit/s -6%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1327 (1121min - 1384max) MBit/s -10%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
1730 (1700min, 1701.74P1 - 1747max) MBit/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1623 (1172min - 1690max) MBit/s +13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1583 (1034min - 1700max) MBit/s +10%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1442 (1087min - 1646max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (944 - 1822, n=37, last 2 years)
1416 MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (632 - 1851, n=176)
1366 MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1180 (1054min - 1237max) MBit/s -18%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
1803 (1749min, 1751.9P1 - 1853max) MBit/s +17%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1712 (1593min - 1743max) MBit/s +11%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1539 (1497min - 1558max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1502 (1405min - 1524max) MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1501 (1422min - 1563max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (987 - 1803, n=37, last 2 years)
1495 MBit/s -3%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (883 - 1857, n=175)
1485 MBit/s -4%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1337 (676min - 1552max) MBit/s -13%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1442 (1087-1646)
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1583 (1034-1700)
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1180 (1054-1237)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1623 (1172-1690)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1730 (1700-1747)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1539 (1497-1558)
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1337 (676-1552)
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1501 (1422-1563)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1711 (1593-1743)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1501 (1405-1524)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1803 (1749-1853)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1474 (704-1623)
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1433 (796-1577)
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1086 (810-1178)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1465 (829-1665)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1619 (1559-1692)
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1571 (1517-1590)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1300-1531)
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1552 (1528-1565)
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1326 (1121-1384)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1528 (1477-1553)
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1607 (1562-1631)

网络摄像头

内置全高清摄像头的网络图像提供了相当好的对比度和清晰度。图像质量只在边缘处有最小的下降。然而,由于暗部的最大ΔΕ为24,亮部的最大ΔΕ为19.1,摄像头的颜色偏差相对较高。 MateBook在弱光条件下也很吃力,图像很快就变得有颗粒感和噪音。

稍微不寻常的是内置麦克风的位置,它们被放置在MateBook底座前面用于打开显示屏的小凹槽里。然而,通常情况下,语音质量不会因此而受到负面影响。

ColorChecker
24 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MateBook 16s i9: 19.98 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 25.8 ∆E

安全问题

你可以通过指纹扫描仪登录笔记本电脑。此外,英特尔酷睿i9的安全功能也可以使用。该笔记本电脑还提供TPM 2.0。虽然安全启动是可用的,但默认情况下是停用的。

辅料

除了MateBook和USB-C充电器外,盒子里只包括必须的文件集。但是,如果你直接从华为(在德国)订购笔记本电脑,在本次测试时,你还可以免费得到一个MateView SE显示器、一个背包和一个无线鼠标,这些都是随笔记本电脑一起提供的。

维护

笔记本电脑的底盖由10颗TX5螺丝和几个塑料夹子固定在位。要接触MateBook 16s的电子元件,除了一把螺丝刀和撬动工具外,你不需要其他东西。一个强大的吸盘可能也会使移除塑料夹子更容易。卸下螺丝后,你可以使用撬动工具,从铰链开始,努力松开笔记本电脑周围的夹子。

然而,一旦进入内部,你就没有太多的维修选择了。工作存储器和WLAN模块是焊接在一起的,为了拆下电池,你必须拆下一些额外的螺丝,其中一些被贴纸封住。有帮助的是,你可以拿出两个风扇,而不必拆下整个冷却系统,这使得清洁冷却鳍和风扇变得更加容易。

打开的MateBook 16s
打开的MateBook 16s
底盖、螺丝和工具
华为MateBook 16s的底部

担保

我们的测试装置是一个评估设备,不用于销售,所以没有保修。一般来说,华为在欧盟为其笔记本电脑的显示屏、主板、键盘、电池和充电器提供24个月的保修。

输入设备

拥有16英寸显示屏的笔记本电脑通常也提供全尺寸键盘。然而,由于华为在这里遵循Apple's MacBook的设计,它放弃了数字块。除了键盘和ClickPad之外,MateBook 16s还包括一个触摸屏。

键盘

华为笔记本电脑的键盘提供了一个背景照明和1.5毫米的键程。再加上清晰可见的压力点,这导致了舒适的触觉。作为一个小的特殊功能,华为在F6和F7键之间的顶部键行放置了一个键来启动Windows语音输入。键盘布局与欧洲标准一致(在德国)。

触摸板

由于其哑光玻璃表面,大的14×9厘米(约5.5×3.5英寸)ClickPad应该能够长时间保持其舒适的触觉。它对最多五个手指的输入作出反应,其手掌识别效果良好。

触摸屏

由于其反射表面,MateBook 16s的触摸屏更像是一个指纹磁铁。显示器对多达十个手指的输入没有任何延迟的反应。然而,这种表面可以使手指更容易滑动。

显示

华为MateBook s16亚像素网格
华为MateBook s16亚像素网格
华为MateBook 16s的光照度
华为MateBook 16s的光照度

华为MateBook 16s的3:2显示屏的分辨率为2,560 × 1,680像素。在反光玻璃后面,你可以找到一个对比度丰富的IPS面板。该显示屏拥有德国认证机构TÜV Rheinland的三项不同认证,应该是低蓝光排放,无闪烁,并提供准确的色彩。华为宣传它的对比度为1.500:1,100%的sRGB色彩空间覆盖率,交付状态下的色彩精确度为ΔE<1。在我们的测量中,这台笔记本电脑错过了所有这三个数值,但差距不大。我们看到的仍然是一个良好而明亮的显示屏,亮度为435.9cd/m²。我们几乎没有发现亮度分布中的任何缺陷。

434
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 454 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 448 cd/m²
Contrast: 1280:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.64
ΔE Greyscale 2.78 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
2.43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, 2560x1680, 16.00
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Au Optronics B160QAN02.L, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
LG Gram 16Z90Q
LG LP160WQ1-SPB2 (LGD06EB), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
39%
-33%
31%
37%
33%
30%
Display P3 Coverage
63
99.91
59%
42
-33%
98.5
56%
99.7
58%
99
57%
96.8
54%
sRGB Coverage
94.9
100
5%
62.8
-34%
99.9
5%
100
5%
100
5%
99.9
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.1
98.87
52%
43.5
-33%
86.1
32%
97
49%
88.5
36%
84.6
30%
Response Times
318%
-9%
74%
91%
18939%
-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 ?(16, 18)
2 ?(1, 1)
94%
31.8 ?(15.4, 16.4)
6%
2 ?(1, 1)
94%
2 ?(1, 1)
94%
80.5 ?(38.5, 42)
-137%
45.7 ?(20.5, 25.2)
-34%
Response Time Black / White *
17 ?(7, 10)
2 ?(1, 1)
88%
20.9 ?(11.2, 9.7)
-23%
8 ?(1, 7)
53%
2 ?(1, 1)
88%
47.2 ?(20.6, 26.6)
-178%
19.7 ?(7.4, 12.3)
-16%
PWM Frequency
26 ?(10)
227 ?(50)
773%
14880 ?(100, 500)
57131%
Screen
-61%
-96%
-14%
195%
4932%
-48%
Brightness middle
448
370
-17%
279.4
-38%
504
13%
412
-8%
504
13%
366
-18%
Brightness
436
371
-15%
257
-41%
465
7%
412
-6%
487
12%
347
-20%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
81
-13%
87
-6%
98
5%
94
1%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.35
0.18
49%
0.35
-0%
0.015
96%
0.001
100%
0.32
9%
Contrast
1280
1552
21%
1440
13%
27467
2046%
504000
39275%
1144
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
2.77
-73%
5.12
-220%
1.83
-14%
2.34
-46%
1.5
6%
2.82
-76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.44
4.08
8%
19.42
-337%
5.51
-24%
3.34
25%
3.3
26%
4.65
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.64
2.83
-342%
1.84
-188%
1.34
-109%
2.95
-361%
2.69
-320%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.78
2.58
7%
5.5
-98%
3.02
-9%
2.78
-0%
2.1
24%
2.3
17%
CCT
6582 99%
6241 104%
6407 101%
6688 97%
6879 94%
6882 94%
6796 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
2.43
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.22 99%
2.39 92%
2.5 88%
2.25 98%
1.971 112%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
99% / 50%
-46% / -70%
30% / 8%
108% / 146%
7968% / 6884%
-14% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

即使华为将其宣传为专业显示器,该面板也不是绝对适合摄影师和视频创作者,因为它只几乎完全覆盖了较小的sRGB色彩空间。AdobeRGB和DisplayP3色彩空间的再现率只有65%左右。

vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
与DisplayP3相比
与DisplayP3相比
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB

即使MateBook在交付状态下明显错过了宣传的ΔΕ<1,但测量的平均色彩偏差非常低,ΔΕ为1.6。我们的ICC配置文件将进一步下降到明显低于1。华为也包括它自己的颜色配置文件,尽管在交付状态下没有激活。

Calman ColorChecker
Calman ColorChecker
Calman ColorChecker已校准
Calman ColorChecker已校准
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度仪的校准
卡尔曼灰度仪的校准
考尔曼饱和度
考尔曼饱和度
Calman 饱和度校准
Calman 饱和度校准
 
 

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 26 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 26 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 26 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17744 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

如果亮度调得很低,我们注意到显示屏在26赫兹时有轻微闪烁。亮度的变化是最小的,几乎不能被我们的传感器所测量。由于其振幅和频率较低,这可能更多是由于背景照明中的一些电子噪声,而不是脉冲宽度调制(PWM)。

尽管有反光的玻璃表面,但只要不在阳光直射下,显示屏在户外也能轻松阅读。即使反射清晰可见,430cd/m²的亮度和高对比度使显示屏在户外也能使用。然而,你不应该把笔记本电脑放在阳光直射下太久,因为铝制外壳会很快发热。

户外使用
户外使用
户外使用
户外使用
户外使用
户外使用

作为典型的IPS面板,即使是陡峭的视角也不会造成任何问题,只有亮度水平随着视角的增加而下降。

业绩

华为MateBook 16s目前只有在我们测试的配置中配备了英特尔酷睿i9-13900H,16GB DDR5内存,和1TB NVMe SSD。特别是考虑到强大的i9处理器,这里的工作内存量似乎有点紧张。由于这款笔记本电脑没有提供专用的GPU,它依靠的是 英特尔Iris Xe与Core i9中的96个EUs。

测试条件和功率调整

华为控制台
华为控制台

华为提供了两种预设的省电模式,可以使用华为的控制台进行选择。在电源模式下,英特尔酷睿i9可以在115瓦的情况下短暂运行,在提升阶段后仍有60瓦的功率。平衡性能模式仍然分别提供95瓦和45瓦的功率。在电池运行中,酷睿i9的功耗在35至40瓦之间。
除了霍格沃茨遗产基准测试外,所有的测试都是在平衡性能模式下运行的。

CineBench R23循环记录
CineBench R23循环记录
3DMark TimeSpy循环日志
3DMark TimeSpy循环日志

处理器

英特尔酷睿i9-13900H属于英特尔目前第13代最强大的处理器,但H系列更像是桤木湖一代的刷新。华为MateBook中的处理器运行功率高达115瓦,这确保了在所有基准测试中的强大结果,使华为笔记本电脑跃居比较领域的首位。

这并不令人惊讶,因为否则你会发现i9更多出现在工作站和游戏笔记本中。在薄型多媒体笔记本电脑中看到它是相当罕见的。华为还为这款强大的处理器配备了强大的冷却系统,使其大部分时间都能在最高80℃(176°F)的温度下运行。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2518 (2463.05-2968.46)
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1906 (1816.37-2350.45)
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø1298 (1272.02-1735.28)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2194 (2130.95-2446.31)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P: Ø1457 (1291.45-1828.74)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max: Ø2074 (2068.47-2081.27)
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1029 (774.98-1497.06)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
85.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
79.5 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max -6!
Apple M2 Max
78.9 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
72.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
69.1 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
67.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
62.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
60.2 pt
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
48.4 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
17754 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (13177 - 20385, n=26)
17145 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
14767 Points -17%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
14555 Points -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4624 - 30789, n=96, last 2 years)
14213 Points -20%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
14099 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
11181 Points -37%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
10252 (8193.94min - 10252.5max) Points -42%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
7857 Points -56%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
2037 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1297 - 2054, n=24)
1901 Points -7%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
1891 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
1825 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
1739 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2110, n=94, last 2 years)
1721 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
1719 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
1625 Points -20%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
1591 Points -22%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
6808 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (4960 - 7716, n=23)
6668 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
5551 Points -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1783 - 11768, n=92, last 2 years)
5374 Points -21%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
5310 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
4517 Points -34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
4044 Points -41%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
3907 Points -43%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
3259 Points -52%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
784 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (428 - 792, n=23)
726 Points -7%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
720 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
708 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
670 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
653 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=92, last 2 years)
647 Points -17%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
607 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
460 Points -41%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
2968 (2463.05min - 2968.46max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2061 - 3100, n=24)
2702 Points -9%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
2446 Points -18%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
2350 (1816.37min - 2350.45max) Points -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (785 - 4703, n=99, last 2 years)
2326 Points -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
2074 (2068.47min, 2068.57P1 - 2081.27max) Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
1828 Points -38%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
1735 (1272.02min - 1735.28max) Points -42%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
1497 (774.98min - 1497.06max) Points -50%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
293 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (211 - 297, n=24)
271 Points -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
260 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
257 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
252 Points -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (142.6 - 308, n=94, last 2 years)
252 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
239 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
238 Points -19%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
223 Points -24%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
459 Seconds * -142%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
349 Seconds * -84%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
290 Seconds * -53%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 662, n=90, last 2 years)
264 Seconds * -39%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
255 Seconds * -34%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
227 Seconds * -19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (166 - 268, n=22)
200 Seconds * -5%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
190 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
70860 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (45045 - 79032, n=23)
67492 MIPS -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20166 - 119900, n=85, last 2 years)
57499 MIPS -19%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
54857 MIPS -23%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
48332 MIPS -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
46027 MIPS -35%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
40711 MIPS -43%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
29646 MIPS -58%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
6533 MIPS
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
6148 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3665 - 6600, n=23)
6053 MIPS -7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
5651 MIPS -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7163, n=85, last 2 years)
5643 MIPS -14%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
5590 MIPS -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
5294 MIPS -19%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
5158 MIPS -21%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
15348 Points +11%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
13768 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (9094 - 15410, n=23)
12812 Points -7%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
11831 Points -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3828 - 23059, n=95, last 2 years)
11410 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
10439 Points -24%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
9159 Points -33%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
9013 Points -35%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
8346 Points -39%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
2003 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
1978 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1140 - 2043, n=23)
1907 Points -5%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
1861 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2342, n=95, last 2 years)
1768 Points -12%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
1751 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
1714 Points -14%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
1683 Points -16%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
1650 Points -18%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
19.4 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (14.7 - 22.3, n=23)
18.9 fps -3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
15.7 fps -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.99 - 30.5, n=83, last 2 years)
15.7 fps -19%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
15.3 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
12.8 fps -34%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
10.6 fps -45%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
7.95 fps -59%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
54.9 s * -35%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (34.4 - 82.8, n=23)
48 s * -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 84.9, n=87, last 2 years)
48 s * -18%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
47.4 s * -16%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
45.3 s * -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
42 s * -3%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.8 s *
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
40.7 s * -0%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P
0.538 sec * -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
0.502 sec * -22%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4873 sec * -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3826 - 0.723, n=85, last 2 years)
0.4794 sec * -16%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
0.4593 sec * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (0.4052 - 0.723, n=23)
0.4488 sec * -9%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4426 sec * -7%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4131 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2968 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
107.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
293 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
98.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
93.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
81.4 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
81.1 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
79.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
67.2 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
55.3 pt
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
15712 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6788 - 19557, n=23)
15429 KRay/s -2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14390 KRay/s -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
13289 KRay/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3804 - 27411, n=83, last 2 years)
13232 KRay/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
8507 KRay/s -46%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7486 KRay/s -52%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6680 KRay/s -57%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
78309 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (22551 - 95579, n=23)
77697 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
72920 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16379 - 136048, n=83, last 2 years)
67535 Points -14%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
66971 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
49719 Points -37%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40675 Points -48%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
26989 Points -66%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3653 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2491 - 4270, n=23)
3631 MB/s -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
3375 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1099 - 6681, n=83, last 2 years)
3100 MB/s -15%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3059 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2552 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2179 MB/s -40%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1404 MB/s -62%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
120936 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (65121 - 120936, n=23)
106233 Points -12%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
102497 Points -15%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
102438 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 134321, n=83, last 2 years)
91712 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
80139 Points -34%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
73671 Points -39%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
66277 Points -45%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
10143 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6108 - 11631, n=23)
9811 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3099 - 15484, n=83, last 2 years)
9116 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8932 Points -12%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8586 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
6671 Points -34%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5113 Points -50%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4692 Points -54%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
38706 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11283 - 48474, n=23)
38446 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
35011 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9602 - 68591, n=83, last 2 years)
34348 Points -11%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
33244 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
24409 Points -37%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
19985 Points -48%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
13175 Points -66%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
134355 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
91493 MB/s -32%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3691 - 149377, n=23)
85762 MB/s -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23702 - 169946, n=83, last 2 years)
75610 MB/s -44%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
65858 MB/s -51%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62143 MB/s -54%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42670 MB/s -68%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
31136 MB/s -77%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (789 - 1254, n=23)
1061 MB/s +4%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1022 MB/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
940 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (302 - 1901, n=83, last 2 years)
875 MB/s -14%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
870 MB/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
755 MB/s -26%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
684 MB/s -33%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
441 MB/s -57%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3655 - 10716, n=23)
8388 KRay/s +1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8275 KRay/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7629 KRay/s -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7221 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1996 - 14590, n=83, last 2 years)
7042 KRay/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4204 KRay/s -49%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4016 KRay/s -51%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3711 KRay/s -55%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
45880 MPixel/s +12%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42678 MPixel/s +4%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
41574 MPixel/s +2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40864 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (10871 - 50488, n=23)
40715 MPixel/s 0%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40107 MPixel/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=83, last 2 years)
37511 MPixel/s -8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
13699 MPixel/s -66%

系统性能

在我们的对比设备中,只有VivoBook Pro 16在PCMark 10的测试中达到了较高的总分值。但VivoBook也能够使用dGPU,因此在生产力和数字内容创作领域达到明显更高的结果。
在CrossMark中,图形芯片的性能发挥的作用要小得多,MateBook 16s变成了对比设备中最强大的。
因此,只要你不要求笔记本执行任何对图形要求高的任务,华为笔记本就能够提供一个优秀的系统性能。一个小的负面因素仍然是工作内存的数量,16GB的内存有点紧张。在处理大量数据时,这大大减慢了笔记本电脑的性能。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
6652 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4635 - 8670, n=79, last 2 years)
6602 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (6190 - 6802, n=6)
6429 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
6406 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6192 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
5933 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
5576 Points -13%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5251 Points -18%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
11822 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
11774 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (11156 - 12286, n=6)
11620 Points -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10937 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
10598 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=79, last 2 years)
10494 Points -11%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9845 Points -16%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
9540 Points -19%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
9016 Points +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5845 - 10742, n=79, last 2 years)
8688 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (7505 - 8526, n=6)
7908 Points +5%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7624 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
7505 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
7197 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
6718 Points -10%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6618 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
9288 Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4688 - 13548, n=79, last 2 years)
8692 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
8073 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (7573 - 8155, n=6)
7853 Points -3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7727 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
6663 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
6608 Points -18%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6031 Points -25%
CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2146 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1797 - 2146, n=5)
1943 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1910 Points -11%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1868 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1009 - 2146, n=87, last 2 years)
1702 Points -21%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1683 Points -22%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1623 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
1579 Points -26%
CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2064 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1684 - 2064, n=5)
1855 Points -10%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1787 Points -13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1669 Points -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (971 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)
1622 Points -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1618 Points -22%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1595 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
1532 Points -26%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2505 Points +13%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2224 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2031 - 2224, n=5)
2105 Points -5%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2009 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2865, n=87, last 2 years)
1900 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1727 Points -22%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1699 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
1652 Points -26%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2171 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1474 - 2171, n=5)
1767 Points -19%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1715 Points -21%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1677 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
1511 Points -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)
1458 Points -33%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1418 Points -35%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1395 Points -36%
PCMark 10 Score
6406 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69724 MB/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
69103 MB/s +8%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
63839 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (37448 - 74486, n=23)
63227 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62918 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20513 - 94254, n=83, last 2 years)
62681 MB/s -2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
61697 MB/s -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
25615 MB/s -60%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65463 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (41599 - 75433, n=23)
63867 MB/s +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 90142, n=83, last 2 years)
61196 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
60901 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
60597 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58380 MB/s -4%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58209 MB/s -4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
25586 MB/s -58%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
88993 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
77448 MB/s +10%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
70522 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69264 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (36152 - 88505, n=23)
66729 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 95196, n=83, last 2 years)
64937 MB/s -8%
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
63333 MB/s -10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
23679 MB/s -66%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
107.4 ns * -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (75 - 346, n=82, last 2 years)
105.1 ns * -19%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
95.5 ns * -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
95.4 ns * -8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
91.1 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (82.3 - 102.3, n=23)
90.2 ns * -2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
88.3 ns *
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
88 ns * -0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

DPC延迟仍然是装有Windows 11的笔记本电脑的致命弱点。MateBook在这里也无法用其目前的驱动程序集进行令人信服的表现,LatencyMon的结论是,实时应用程序,如音频和视频处理可能会成为笔记本电脑的问题。

在YouTube上播放4K 60Hz视频时,高延迟也变得很明显,在我们的测试视频中,有7个帧被丢掉。

YouTube 4K 60Hz测试
YouTube 4K 60Hz测试
延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2645.7 μs * -16%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2290 μs *
LG Gram 16Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1728.6 μs * +25%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1573.4 μs * +31%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
877 μs * +62%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
370.2 μs * +84%

* ... smaller is better