Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

用于笔记本电脑的Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti是基于Turing架构(TU116芯片)的移动图形卡。与更快的RTX 2000 GPU(例如RTX 2060)相比,1660Ti没有集成光线追踪或Tensor内核。性能类似于旧的GTX 1070(笔记本电脑),但TGP仅为80瓦(相比GTX1070的115瓦)。与台式机GTX 1660 Ti相比,频率降低了(基准频率降低3%,睿频降低10%)。

Turing一代不仅为RTX卡引入了光追,而且还优化了内核和缓存的体系结构。根据Nvidia的说法,CUDA内核现在可以同时执行浮点和整数运算,以提高现代游戏中计算繁重的工作负载的性能。此外,也对缓存进行了重新设计(新的统一内存体系结构的缓存是Pascal的两倍)。与Pascal相比,这使得每个时钟指令最多增加50%,能耗提高40%。

Nvidia指定用于笔记本电脑的1660Ti的功耗为8​​0瓦TGP(总图形功率),比1660 Ti的Max-Q型号高20瓦。 TU116芯片采用12nm FFN台积电工艺。

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 1536 @ 1500 - 1770 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1455 - 1590 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 1536 @ 1140 - 1335 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) 1024 @ 1530 - 1725 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1024 @ 1350 MHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1395 - 1560 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) 896 @ 1485 - 1665 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1024 @ 1035 - 1200 MHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 1024 @ 1020 - 1245 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G0
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed1455 - 1590 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory6144 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
Transistor Count6600 Million
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
38.6 pt (40%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -96%
...
AMD Radeon R7 370 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 1%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) 3%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire 4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 7%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 5406     avg: 5732     median: 5701 (39%)     max: 6065 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 5335     avg: 5631     median: 5657 (38%)     max: 5931 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 412820     avg: 417692     median: 416379 (76%)     max: 423220 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 129343     avg: 204018     median: 149231 (20%)     max: 316086 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 29390     avg: 34275     median: 35118.5 (52%)     max: 37206 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 59839     avg: 93062     median: 97162.5 (50%)     max: 103428 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 12263     avg: 13182     median: 13078 (44%)     max: 14050 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 14186     avg: 14793     median: 14753 (36%)     max: 15482 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 129020     avg: 199464     median: 170512 (23%)     max: 359516 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 15912     avg: 17240     median: 17291 (45%)     max: 18607 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 18610     avg: 19958     median: 20052.5 (39%)     max: 20940 points
...
AMD Radeon R9 Fury -12%
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) -10%
AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop) -5%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop) -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 11%
...
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Energy (energy-02) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
251 fps (58%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
144 fps (54%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
2416 Samples/s (25%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
4827 Samples/s (45%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
10148 Points (36%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
154 Watt (33%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 126     avg: 139     median: 134.1 (29%)     max: 158.9 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1545     avg: 1665     median: 1650 (86%)     max: 1815 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
low 1280x720
262  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
159  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
44.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
197  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
148  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
166  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
103  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75.3 78.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.5 52.1 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.2 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
94.7 104 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.9 91.4 ~ 88 fps    + Compare