Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

1.7 TFLOPSAdreno X1-45是一款集成图形适配器，可用于 骁龙 X Plus 8 核 X1P-42-100SoC 的功能。与速度更快的 3.8 TFLOPS和 4.6 TFLOPSX1-85 iGPU 相比，这个小家伙不仅运行时钟速度较低，而且可使用的统一着色器数量也较少，最有可能只有 768 个。iGPU 2.1 TFLOPS X1-45则仅在时钟速度上有所不同。

架构

据报道，底层架构(ChipsAndCheese) 在许多方面与 Adreno 730因此 iGPU 兼容 DirectX 12，但不兼容 DirectX 12 Ultimate。光线追踪仅通过 Vulcan 1.3 支持。支持的最高 OpenGL 版本是 ES 3.2。iGPU 可以访问足够快的 RAM，但缓存相对较小且速度较慢。AVC、HEVC 和 AV1 视频编解码器可进行硬件解码和硬件编码；而 VP9 仅可进行解码。

支持的最高显示器分辨率是 UHD 2160p，而不是 SUHD 4320p。

性能

这在很大程度上取决于特定系统的功率目标，就像 AMD、Intel 和 Nvidia 的产品一样。尽管如此，1.7 TFLOPS 型号与 GeForce GTX 950M明显落后于 Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80 EUs)在合成基准测试中则明显落后。在游戏中，它与 GeForce MX350要好得多；不过，对于 2020 年前的游戏和高清 720p 等分辨率来说，这样的性能也只是刚刚够用。

值得一提的是，高通公司的图形驱动程序并不像 AMD、英特尔，尤其是 Nvidia 所提供的那样完善，导致某些游戏出现严重的视觉伪影。很多游戏根本无法启动。

功耗

Snapdragon X Plus 8 核芯片的功耗通常不超过 30 W，包括内置 RAM。因此，iGPU 的功耗极有可能不会超过 20 W。

由于采用了台积电的 N4P 工艺，因此可以肯定地说，到 2024 年底，这款 iGPU 的能效将优于平均水平。当然，它仍然远远落后于Apple 的 M 系列芯片，正如我们的 深度分析文章所示.

Snapdragon X Series

Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1536 @ 1.5 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 1536 @ 1.25 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Pipelines768 - unified
Memory Speed8448 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption20 Watt
technology4 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesSUHD 2160p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/AV1 encoding and decoding
Date of Announcement03.09.2024
CPU in Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 x ? MHz, 30 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-1008 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-1008 x ? MHz, 30 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 228     avg: 231.2     median: 232 (2%)     max: 235 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1080     avg: 1115     median: 1097 (3%)     max: 1148 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3263 Points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3164     avg: 3194     median: 3187 (4%)     max: 3225 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
5914 Points (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3602     avg: 3648     median: 3634 (5%)     max: 3752 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3690     avg: 3736     median: 3731 (3%)     max: 3852 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 981     avg: 1043     median: 1066.5 (3%)     max: 1075 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 873     avg: 917     median: 933.5 (2%)     max: 941 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -88%
...
AMD Radeon 820M
786 -14%
AMD Radeon RX 540
787 -14%
AMD Radeon 540X
797 -13%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
811 -12%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
812 -11%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
820 -11%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
821 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro M620
862 -6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
872 -5%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
917
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
936 2%
AMD Radeon Pro 450
952 4%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
956 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
971 6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
980 7%
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
995 9%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
999 9%
AMD Radeon RX 640
1008 10%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
1012 10%
...
Nvidia RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
23277 2438%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
44789 4784%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 17207     avg: 17800     median: 17607 (17%)     max: 19040 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 23800     avg: 24860     median: 24152 (6%)     max: 27960 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4435     avg: 4521     median: 4540 (5%)     max: 4622 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4031     avg: 4116     median: 4141 (3%)     max: 4209 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -96%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
3691 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro M620
3761 -9%
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
3761 -9%
AMD Radeon 820M
3913 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
3949 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
3979 -3%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
3996 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
4070 -1%
AMD Radeon 540X
4097 0%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
4116
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
4146 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
4150 1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
4191 2%
AMD FirePro W5170M
4197 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
4229 3%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
4230 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
4333 5%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
4338 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
4348 6%
...
Nvidia RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
68271 1559%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 3053%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6442 points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 19.7     avg: 22.5     median: 22.8 (1%)     max: 24.2 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 128.2     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 246 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 9415     avg: 42943     median: 9798.5 (2%)     max: 206281 points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 11315     avg: 49046     median: 13789 (3%)     max: 207733 points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.54     avg: 10.6     median: 9.6 (1%)     max: 15.2 Watt
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18     avg: 18.5     median: 18.5 (3%)     max: 18.9 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.582     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (49%)     max: 0.611 fps per Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 19.1     avg: 22.6     median: 21.8 (6%)     max: 29.9 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17     avg: 20.9     median: 20.1 (3%)     max: 28.5 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.2067     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.4318 fps per Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
46.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

2023
low 1920x1080
13.6 14.4 14.4 14.6 14.7 14.7 15 15.2 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.6 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.1 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.3 11.5 11.6 11.6 11.7 11.7 11.8 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3 9.2 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.9 10 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.2 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
23.9
24
25.4
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
7.2
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.7
7.4
7.4
7.3
4
7
7.2
7.6
7.3
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
11.7 12.9 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.4 13.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.4 10.9 10.9 11 11 11 11 11.1 11.2 11.7 11.8 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7.8 8.7 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.7 10.2 10.3 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.8 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.4 10.1 10.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
21.9
20.5
21.4
21.3
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
33.1 33.7 37.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.1 36.6 38.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.9 23 23.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2 16.4 16.7 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
63.8
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

2022
low 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
50
Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018
low 1280x720
16 41 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15 16 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
40
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
0 (!) 78 83 84 84 85 85.5 85.5 86.7 87.4 87.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29 29.6 29.8 29.9 30 30 30 30.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22 22.5 22.7 22.8 23 23 23 23 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19 19 19 19.3 19.6 19.7 20 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
36 37 37 38 38 38 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21 21 21 21 21 21 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19 19 19 19 19 19 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17 17 18 18 18 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
33.3 34.9 34.9 36 36 36.3 36.7 38.5 39.3 39.5 40.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 28.2 30.4 30.5 30.8 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.3 27.3 27.3 27.3 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
21.4 31.4 36.8 36.9 37.1 37.1 37.2 37.2 37.4 37.5 37.6 37.8 38.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.9 14.9 14.9 15 15 15.1 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.7 18 18.1 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7 9.8 9.9 10 10.1 12.4 15.1 15.3 15.7 18.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
77 78.5 79.5 80.3 80.4 81 81.6 83.4 85 85.3 85.6 85.7 89.3 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.8 63.2 63.2 64.1 65.8 66 66.1 66.1 66.3 67.1 67.3 67.8 73.2 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37 55 55.2 55.5 55.7 55.9 56.2 56.3 56.7 56.9 57.6 57.8 60.2 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.9 47.5 47.8 47.9 48.1 48.2 48.7 48.8 49.1 49.2 49.7 49.9 51.8 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
65 68 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39 41 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22 22 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
84.9 87.5 88 88.5 91.5 92.8 94.4 94.7 95.7 95.9 96.4 98.3 112 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71.2 81.2 84.2 84.8 85 87.1 88 88.7 89.4 90.6 91.1 91.2 103.6 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.2 32.4 32.5 32.8 33 33 33.1 33.4 33.4 33.9 34 34.2 34.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 14 14 14.3 14.5 14.6 14.7 14.7 15 15.3 15.3 15.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
77
77.4
79.6
77.8
82.4
85.7
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
89.7
100
88.9
83.9
89.6
98.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Total War Pharaoh46.1
Cyberpunk 20771511108
Baldur's Gate 3131199
F1 2235362316
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands27.921.113.410.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider291613
Strange Brigade77302319
Far Cry 537211918
X-Plane 11.11372427
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark361613
Dota 2 Reborn83665547
The Witcher 367402211
GTA V94873315
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		4
5
4
7
3
2
10
2

8
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 28. 03:04:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:25:57 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.045s ... 0.046s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#7 composed specs +0s ... 0.046s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#9 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.014s ... 0.06s

#11 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.044s ... 0.105s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.105s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.539s ... 0.644s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.644s

#15 Got 399 rows for game benchmarks. +0.05s ... 0.694s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.694s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.702s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.129s ... 0.831s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.552s ... 1.384s

#20 return log +0s ... 1.384s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS graphics card

惠普EliteBook 6 G1q 14评测：向 EliteBook 600 系列说再见

惠普EliteBook 6 G1q 14评测：向 EliteBook 600 系列说再见

EliteBook 6 G1q 为主流企业带来了高通骁龙和 Windows ARM 系统。如果优先考虑延长运行时间和基本办公任务，它是理想之选，但应用程序兼容性和显示选项仍不一致。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
骁龙处理器和 18 小时电池续航，只需 700 美元--三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 Copilot+ 评测

骁龙处理器和 18 小时电池续航，只需 700 美元--三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 Copilot+ 评测

Galaxy Book4 Edge 是一款 15.6 英寸的日常笔记本电脑，售价不到 700 美元。Snapdragon 处理器性能充足，电池续航时间长，但没有背光键盘。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 15.60" | 1.5 kg
惠普 OmniBook 5 14 笔记本电脑评测：配备 OLED 的 Windows ARM 笔记本电脑，售价低于 600 美元

惠普 OmniBook 5 14 笔记本电脑评测：配备 OLED 的 Windows ARM 笔记本电脑，售价低于 600 美元

OmniBook 5 14 是一款功能强大、价格低廉的解决方案。
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
这款经济实惠的 ARM 笔记本电脑一定会让 AMD 和英特尔担心：联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 评测

这款经济实惠的 ARM 笔记本电脑一定会让 AMD 和英特尔担心：联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 评测

高通公司（Qualcomm）希望通过骁龙 X 处理器使经济型产品市场的竞争白热化。联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 就是搭载这种芯片的笔记本电脑。Oryon CPU 在这里真正展示了它的优势，尽管这款经济型笔记本电脑肯定会有一些妥协。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 15.30" | 1.6 kg
终于有了静音骁龙 2 合 1 --微软 Surface Pro 12 评测

终于有了静音骁龙 2 合 1 --微软 Surface Pro 12 评测

微软推出了新款紧凑型 Surface Pro，配备 12 英寸显示屏和高通公司的 Snapdragon ARM 处理器。它的一大特色是采用被动冷却技术，可消除恼人的风扇噪音。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 12.00" | 1 kg

Microsoft Surface Laptop 13: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 功能太多，价格太贵？ - 配备骁龙 X Plus 的微软 Surface 13 笔记本电脑评测

Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 华硕 Vivobook S16 笔记本电脑评测：日常使用的好电脑，电池续航时间近 20 小时，售价 899 欧元

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 不到 1,000 美元，电池续航时间超过 24 小时：联想 ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 笔记本电脑评测

Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 14.00", 1 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook A14 笔记本电脑评测--搭载骁龙 X 处理器的 14 英寸 OLED 亚笔记本电脑仅重 978 克

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14Q8X9 评测：经济实惠的高通 ARM 可转换机型

Acer Swift Go 14 AI: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » 宏碁 Swift Go 14 AI 笔记本电脑评测：搭载骁龙处理器的 MacBook Air 竞争对手的 24 小时运行时间

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  Review » 华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机

Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
  Review » 华硕 VivoBook S 15 OLED Snapdragon 8 核笔记本电脑评测--搭载 Snapdragon X Plus，几乎无声的日常伴侣

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  Review » 高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
  Review » 高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

  Review » 高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 16-fb0000: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 16-fb0000

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 15.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10

Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-11M: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-11M

Acer Aspire 16 AI A16-11MT: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 16 AI A16-11MT

HP Omnibook 5 14: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Omnibook 5 14

HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 14-he0000: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 14-he0000

HP EliteBook 6 G1q: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 6 G1q

Asus Vivobook S14 S3407QA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 S3407QA

Microsoft Surface Laptop 13: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 13

Asus Vivobook 16 A1607: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16 A1607

Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, Snapdragon X Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, Snapdragon X Plus

Asus Vivobook 14 A1407QA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14 A1407QA

Microsoft Surface Pro 12: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 12.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 12

Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA

Dell Latitude 5455: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 5455

Asus Vivobook 16 X1607QA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16 X1607QA

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3x Snapdragon: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 15.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3x Snapdragon

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15

Acer Swift Go 14 AI: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.50", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 AI

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14Q8X9

Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14Q8X9

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in1 14Q8X9

Dell Inspiron 14 5441: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 5441

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306

HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 惠普 EliteBook 6 G1q 14 电池续航时间是该系列所有 14 英寸机型中最长的之一

   » 惠普 EliteBook 6 G1q 14 少了一项其他大多数商用笔记本电脑都具备的关键功能

HP Omnibook 5 14: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » 惠普 OmniBook 5 14 降至仅 550 美元，配备 OLED 屏幕和超过 16 小时的 WLAN 电池续航时间

   » 惠普 OmniBook 5 14 是最便宜的 OLED 笔记本电脑之一，但有一个问题

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 15.30", 1.6 kg
   » 利用英特尔和 AMD 的弱点：高通公司为何在经济型笔记本电脑领域大放异彩？

Microsoft Surface Pro 12: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 12.00", 1 kg
   » 微软 Surface Pro 12 英寸机型小巧，电池续航时间长且静音

Microsoft Surface Laptop 13: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.00", 1.2 kg
   » 谁会买这个？微软的 Surface Laptop 13 比 Surface Laptop 13.8 更糟糕，价格也更贵

Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (S5606CA) 发布，配备最新英特尔酷睿 Ultra 200H Arrow Lake 移动 CPU 和 Lumina OLED 显示屏

   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (M506KA) 和 Vivobook S 14 (M5406WA) 首次亮相，配备全新 AMD Krackan Point APU 和 OLED 显示屏

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6850M XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Radeon 8060S
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 6800S
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Radeon RX 7700S
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Radeon RX 6700M
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 7600M *
M4 Max 32-Core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
A770M
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
Radeon RX 6600S
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M
Radeon 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6550M *
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S *
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU
Arc 140T *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
A370M *
Pro A30M *
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Radeon 890M
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6450M *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 8-Core
X2-90 *
X2-85 *
Arc 140V
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon 880M
GeForce MX570
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Adreno 840 *
Arc 7-Core *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
M4 8-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
A310 *
A350M *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *
Vega M GH
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Adreno 830 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
Radeon 780M
GeForce MX550
Arc 130V
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T500 Laptop GPU *
Arc 130T
GeForce MX450 *
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 860M *
Radeon 760M *
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Radeon 840M *
Radeon 740M *
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P520
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
Quadro P500 *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Vega 9
Vega 8 *
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Radeon 820M *
Vega 7
GeForce MX130
Vega 8
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-09-12)