Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

AMD Vega M GL / 870

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL或Radeon RX Vega 870(戴尔)是速度较慢的Intel Kaby-Lake-G SoC中的集成GPU。它在单个封装中集成了Kaby-Lake处理器,Vega图形卡和4 GB HBM2显存。该显卡提供20个CU(1280个着色器),时钟频率为931-1011 MHz。

目前看起来GPU是Polaris和Vega(HBM内存控制器)的混合体。因为显卡在内部称为Polaris 22。有关Vega架构的详细信息可以在我们关于Raven Ridge架构的专门文章中找到。

根据英特尔的基准测试,Vega M GL的性能应介于Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050和1050 Ti之间。因此,它非常适合1080p的高分辨率游戏。

功耗与Vega Mobile GPU非常相似,但由于外形小巧,可以使用Kaby-Lake-G SoC构建更小的笔记本电脑。整个封装的TDP指定为65瓦,包括GPU,CPU和HBM2存储器。

ManufacturerAMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega Series
RX Vega 64 4096 @ 1630 MHz2048 Bit @ 945 MHz
RX Vega 56 3584 @ 1138 - 1474 MHz409.6 Bit @ 800 MHz
Vega Mobile 1792 2048 Bit
Vega M GH 1536 @ 1063 - 1190 MHz
Vega M GL / 870 1280 @ 931 - 1011 MHz
WX Vega M GL 1280 @ 931 - 1011 MHz
Vega 11 704 @ 1240 MHz
Vega 10 640 @ 1300 MHz
Vega 9 576 @ 1300 MHz
Vega 8 512 @ 1200 MHz
Vega 6 R4000 384 @ 1500 MHz
Vega 6 384 @ 1100 MHz
Vega 3 192 @ 1000 MHz
Vega 2 128 @ 1100 MHz
CodenameVega Kaby Lake-G
ArchitectureVega
Pipelines1280 - unified
Core Speed931 - 1011 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeHBM2
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology14 nm
FeaturesTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement07.01.2018
CPU in Vega M GL / 870GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-8706G4 x 3100 MHz, 65 W931 MHz1011 MHz
Intel Core i7-8705G4 x 3100 MHz, 65 W931 MHz1011 MHz
Intel Core i5-8305G4 x 2800 MHz, 65 W931 MHz1011 MHz
min. - max.931 MHz1011 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
22.3 pt (23%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -93%
...
AMD Radeon HD 6870 -16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M -15%
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 0%
AMD FirePro W7170M 0%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
AMD FirePro M6100 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 7%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X 13%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 2121     avg: 2199     median: 2225 (15%)     max: 2252 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 2031     avg: 2070     median: 2072 (14%)     max: 2108 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 261434     avg: 290539     median: 299071 (55%)     max: 311111 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 46963     avg: 106261     median: 106261 (15%)     max: 165559 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 15911     avg: 19226     median: 19473 (29%)     max: 21322 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 37915     avg: 40459     median: 38812 (20%)     max: 44796 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 5879     avg: 6114     median: 6225 (21%)     max: 6280 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 7059     avg: 7254     median: 7329 (18%)     max: 7355 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 74196     avg: 127123     median: 127123 (17%)     max: 180050 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 9104     avg: 9465     median: 9380 (24%)     max: 9890 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 9632     avg: 9910     median: 9862 (19%)     max: 10118 points
...
AMD Radeon R9 M295X -11%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile -3%
AMD FirePro W7170M -2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL 1%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 4%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 9%
...
0%
100%
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
183 fps (29%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
42.6 fps (12%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
28 fps (18%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
63.8 fps (26%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
43.3 fps (21%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
158 fps (27%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
110 fps (25%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 1096     avg: 1131     median: 1130.5 (12%)     max: 1165 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 2205     avg: 2253     median: 2253 (21%)     max: 2301 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 862     avg: 2179     median: 956 (3%)     max: 4719 Points
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 84.3     avg: 85.8     median: 85.8 (19%)     max: 87.2 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1011 MHz (53%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark 1.19 GPU Stress Test 1280x720
838 MHz (48%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
low 1280x720
172.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
57.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
83.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
90.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
97.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
69.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1920x1080
47.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
64.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
72.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
120.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.2  fps    + Compare