小米NoteBook Pro笔记本电脑评测。残缺的酷睿i7-11370H限制了其他良好的设备
自从推出 小米NoteBook 14地平线版2020年，小米一直试图在中端笔记本电脑细分市场上为自己打出一片天地。几个月前，小米 推出了几个月前，小米在印度市场推出了两款新笔记本电脑--小米NoteBook Pro和小米NoteBook Ultra。我们带来了小米NoteBook Pro进行评测。
小米NoteBook Pro是一款14英寸笔记本电脑，类似于 RedmiBook Pro 15在更多方面。我们的测试样本是由英特尔Tiger Lake-H35 酷睿i7-11370H，16GB DDR4-3200内存，以及512GB NVMe SSD，这是Pro系列的最大可配置选项。这个配置将使你花费73,999英镑（993美元）。
在这篇评论中，我们对Mi NoteBook Pro进行了测试，看看这款笔记本电脑的性能是否和它的外观一样好。
Potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.3 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.2 % v7 (old) | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 i7-11370H, GeForce MX450 | 1.7 kg | 16 mm | 15.60" | 3200x2000 | ||
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.2 kg | 16.55 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 76.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Realme Book (Slim) i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 |
外壳。高级全铝机箱
最近，我们已经看到一个健康的趋势，即中档笔记本电脑，如 笔记本（超薄）以及小米NoteBook Pro和Ultra系列都采用了全金属结构。据小米称，小米NoteBook Pro采用一体式设计，由航空级6系列铝材制成，经过CNC加工和阳极氧化处理，看起来很高档。然而，底部面板是由塑料制成的。
因此，Mi NoteBook Pro感觉很好，没有尖锐的边缘或分散注意力的设计元素。全铝结构提供了轻量级的额外好处，笔记本电脑的重量仅为1.4公斤。
铰链足够结实，可以用一根手指打开盖子。盖子不会晃动，扭曲的程度可以忽略不计。键盘甲板也相当坚硬，但当用力按下时，它可能会有一点弯曲。总的来说，小米NoteBook Pro的结构没有什么可抱怨的地方。
连接性。涵盖基本内容
小米NoteBook Pro没有提供太多的端口，但它确实照顾到了基本要素。在左边，我们发现一个USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C端口，一个HDMI 1.4输出，USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A，和雷电4。在右边，我们发现唯一的USB 2.0 Type-A端口和一个3.5毫米组合音频插孔。该设备上的所有Type-C接口都支持USB供电，所以没有专门的充电端口可用。
我们在访问这些端口或将各种外围设备连接到这些端口时没有遇到任何障碍。也就是说，没有内置的microSD读卡器或Kensington锁插槽可用。
沟通
我们的测试设备配备了英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201无线局域网卡和蓝牙5.1。我们注意到，在离我们的参考Netgear Nighthawk AX12 RAX120路由器1米远的地方，下载速度很好。
无线性能对于大多数使用情况来说应该是足够的。 然而，上传速度不稳定，即使在多次重复测试后，该卡的上传速度也有些偏低。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
网络摄像头
在环境光线良好的情况下，720p的摄像头可以完成偶尔的视频通话的工作。即使在良好的环境照明条件下，颜色也显示出高偏差。低光下的图像会出现噪音，而且清晰度也不是特别好，这一点从我们下面的测试图中可以看出。
安全问题
小米在小米NoteBook Pro的电源按钮中加入了一个指纹传感器。指纹传感器与Windows Hello一起工作，在日常使用中反应相当灵敏。一个独立的TPM 2.0模块存在，这使得该设备有资格获得Windows 11升级，事实上，在测试期间，小米NoteBook Pro已经获得了这一资格。
辅料
除了65W的USB-C电源适配器和通常的文书工作外，盒子里没有其他附件。
维护
没有专门的维修挡板。卸下底部的八颗Torx T5螺丝，就可以将底板移开。
Wi-Fi卡和NVMe固态硬盘是用户可更换的，但内存模块是焊接在主板上的。没有额外的驱动器托架或M.2插槽用于存储扩展。
小米NoteBook Pro似乎使用了与红米Book Pro 15相同的主板。 红米Book Pro 15.由于小米NoteBook Pro没有配备专用的 NvidiaGeForce MX450图形，因此放置GPU和GDDR6 VRAM芯片的区域似乎没有使用。
担保
小米为Mi NoteBook Pro提供一年的标准保修。在结账时，买家可以选择延长保修期一年，价格为2,699英镑（36美元），或两年，价格为3,699英镑（49美元）。此外，还可以购买有效期为一年的意外伤害液体损害（ADLD）计划，价格为4,099英镑（54美元）。
输入设备。安静的按键和僵硬的触摸板
键盘
小米提供了一个体面的键盘，有标准尺寸的按键。键盘提供了安静的打字体验，但1.3毫米的键程感觉有点浅，没有提供很多触觉反馈。此外，触摸打字员可能会觉得键盘提供的阻力比他们习惯的要大一些。有一个两级背光，可以在黑暗中实现良好的按键可读性。
没有切换性能模式的特殊按键。然而，在顶行的末端有一个专门的宏键，可以激活捆绑的宏键应用程序中定义的宏。
触摸板
12.5厘米×8.3厘米的触摸板为舒适的导航提供了很大的面积，并支持WindowsPrecision 驱动程序，以实现流畅的手势。左右点击按钮与触摸板齐平，点击声音不大。然而，在我们的测试样品中，触摸板按钮特别僵硬。随着时间的推移，僵硬程度确实有所降低，但你可能最好使用一个外部鼠标。
显示。体面的FFS面板，没有PWM
我们的小米NoteBook Pro单元采用熊猫LM140GF1L02 14英寸16:10面板，分辨率为2560x1600，亮度为300尼特，刷新率为60赫兹。小米称这是一块IPS面板，但在网上快速搜索后发现，这实际上是一块带有边缘场开关（FFS）的氧化物TFT-LCD。然而，它确实提供了典型IPS显示屏的优点。
长时间的曝光显示了角落里明显的背光渗漏。亮度分布为87%，还算不错。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 364 cd/m²
Contrast: 1686:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.82 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 1.21
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
CCT: 8320 K
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Panda LM140GF1L02, Oxide TFT-LCD FFS, 14", 2560x1600 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 LEN140WQ+, IPS, 14", 2880x1800 | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 16.1", 1920x1080 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 IPS, 15.6", 3200x2000 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 14", 1920x1200 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP 14s-fq1357ng AUO403D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Realme Book (Slim) Chi Mei P140ZKA-BZ1, IPS, 14", 2160x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 11% | 2% | 1% | 11% | -43% | -41% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 66.2 | 76.9 16% | 66.6 1% | 66.7 1% | 77.1 16% | 37.2 -44% | 38.11 -42% | 66.6 1% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 95.8 | 99.8 4% | 99.5 4% | 96.3 1% | 99.8 4% | 55.9 -42% | 57 -41% | 97.8 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 67 | 76.7 14% | 68.5 2% | 68.5 2% | 76.7 14% | 38.43 -43% | 39.37 -41% | 68.2 2% |
| Response Times | -3% | 9% | -4% | -92% | -15% | -20% | 6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 37.33 ? | 36.4 ? 2% | 32 ? 14% | 34.8 ? 7% | 61.2 ? -64% | 41 ? -10% | 41 ? -10% | 33.26 ? 11% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 20.91 ? | 22.4 ? -7% | 20 ? 4% | 24 ? -15% | 46 ? -120% | 25 ? -20% | 27 ? -29% | 20.62 ? 1% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 2500 ? | 58500 ? | ||||||
| Screen | 18% | 24% | -21% | 9% | -51% | -3% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 371 | 410 11% | 304 -18% | 312 -16% | 412 11% | 269 -27% | 220 -41% | 403.52 9% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 338 | 395 17% | 284 -16% | 298 -12% | 392 16% | 244 -28% | 223 -34% | 390 15% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 91 5% | 88 1% | 87 0% | 81 -7% | 83 -5% | 85 -2% | 91 5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.22 | 0.29 -32% | 0.165 25% | 0.18 18% | 0.32 -45% | 0.23 -5% | 0.225 -2% | 0.27 -23% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1686 | 1414 -16% | 1842 9% | 1733 3% | 1288 -24% | 1170 -31% | 978 -42% | 1495 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.82 | 3.24 33% | 1.44 70% | 5.39 -12% | 1.88 61% | 4.94 -2% | 4.16 14% | 5.23 -9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.35 | 5.26 44% | 3.62 61% | 9.95 -6% | 3.06 67% | 20.37 -118% | 7.43 21% | 9.69 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 0.41 66% | 3.15 -160% | 1.96 -62% | 5.03 -316% | 0.62 49% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 4.2 32% | 2.6 58% | 6.3 -2% | 2.2 65% | 1.71 72% | 2.35 62% | 6.5 -5% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.41 91% | 2.192 100% | 2.1 105% | 2.52 87% | 2.62 84% | 2.08 106% |
| CCT | 8320 78% | 6012 108% | 6527 100% | 7473 87% | 6650 98% | 6535 99% | 6389 102% | 7727 84% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 68.5 | 69 | 68.7 | 35 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 99.5 | 96 | 99.8 | 56 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
14% | 12% /
17% | -8% /
-14% | -24% /
-5% | -36% /
-44% | -21% /
-14% | 4% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
小米宣称小米NoteBook Pro的sRGB覆盖率为100%；我们测量的结果接近96%，这还是不错的。Adobe RGB和DCI-P3的覆盖率与这个价格范围内的预期差不多。
Colorchecker的平均Delta E值为4.82，开箱即用的色彩准确度没有什么可写的，显示屏看起来比我们希望的要冷一些。然而，我们的校准程序有助于大幅提高色彩准确性，使平均Delta E值达到1.21。
读者可以从上面的链接下载校准后的ICC配置文件。
显示质量对于一般的多媒体消费，甚至对于基本的照片或视频编辑工作流程来说都是很好的。任何更严肃的事情，都可能从具有更广泛色域覆盖的外部显示器中受益。
我们测量了20.91毫秒黑色到白色和37.33毫秒50%灰色到80%灰色的综合响应时间。这些不是特别理想，但Mi NoteBook Pro不是针对游戏用户的，所以较高的响应时间在日常使用中不应该有太大的影响。
小米表示，该面板使用直流调光来控制显示器的背光。然而，我们在所有亮度水平上没有测量到任何可感知的PWM或直流调光频率，这对眼睛敏感的用户来说是个好消息。
请看我们的文章，"为什么脉冲宽度调制（PWM）是如此令人头痛"以了解更多信息，以及我们的 PWM排名表以了解所有评测设备的PWM和响应时间的概况。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37.33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.58 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.75 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  | |
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
只要阳光不直接落在屏幕上，哑光显示屏在户外也能保持良好的可读性。即使从极端角度看，也没有可察觉的色彩或亮度损失。
性能。酷睿i7-11370H未完全弯曲
我们的测试样本由4C/8T的 英特尔酷睿i7-11370H Tiger Lake-H35处理器。买家可以为小米NoteBook Pro配置一个酷睿i5-11300H也是如此。这两种配置都缺乏任何形式的独立显卡。
处理器
酷睿i7-11370H的PL1为28W，插电时的PL2为64W。28 W的PL1意味着该处理器可以提供3 GHz的基础时钟，最大提升到4.8 GHz。使用电池时，PL1降至25W。
我们在Cinebench R15多循环测试中观察到良好的持续性能。然而，小米在Mi NoteBook Pro中实施的Core i7-11370H并不是我们所见过的最快的。在 联想IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro和 Acer Swift 3采用相同的处理器，性能明显提高。
没有提供特殊的电源或性能模式，所以你将不得不依赖Windows电池滑块。
电池上的PL1有所减少，确实对单核性能有很大影响。快速的Cinebench R20运行显示，在电池供电的情况下，单核得分减少了24%，而多核得分或多或少保持不变。
请看我们专门的酷睿i7-11370H网页，了解相关信息和基准测试。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 11924, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1438 - 2578, n=11) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (475 - 601, n=11) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 30783, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (3696 - 6646, n=12) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2459, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1081 - 1556, n=11) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (606 - 1086, n=17) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (162.9 - 233, n=15) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (432 - 762, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (5074 - 5550, n=11) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (18961 - 28520, n=11) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (805 - 2974, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1376 - 1607, n=10) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 23059, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (3828 - 6115, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (4.98 - 8.82, n=11) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (23.6 - 56.5, n=11) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (0.544 - 0.596, n=11) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=61, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (5204 - 8413, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (23958 - 34020, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1188 - 8623, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1656 - 2297, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (42086 - 52930, n=10) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (3755 - 5027, n=10) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (14433 - 20417, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (26066 - 169946, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (44267 - 76866, n=10) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Multimedia (440 - 2022, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (289 - 422, n=10) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (2756 - 4551, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 65787, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H (15892 - 40069, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
系统性能
总的来说，PCMark 10得分比我们观察到的宏碁Swift 3和联想IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro低6%左右。 总的来说，我们在日常生产力任务中没有面临任何问题或滞后，包括文字处理、电子表格、轻度图像编辑和网络浏览。
Core i5-1135G7- poweredHP Envy 14 在测试的生产力和数字内容创作部分，似乎比Mi NoteBook Pro有优势，可能是由于专用GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU的一些帮助。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 8670, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5199 - 5459, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 12420, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9996 - 10650, n=6) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6763 - 10615, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6911 - 7388, n=6) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 15438, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5483 - 5838, n=6) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5025 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2996 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5199 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 109252, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (38100 - 64524, n=5) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Multimedia (24312 - 125604, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (40993 - 62417, n=5) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Multimedia (24382 - 117933, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (40211 - 65610, n=5) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (83.1 - 91.3, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
在采用该处理器的竞争性笔记本电脑中，Mi NoteBook Pro显示出迄今为止最高的DPC延迟。我们观察到，一旦打开默认的网络浏览器，中断到处理的延迟就会飙升。在播放我们测试的YouTube 4K视频后添加Prime95，该值增加到5487.3微秒。
我们注意到，Windows驱动模式框架Wdf01000.sys是造成这种延迟增加的主要原因。Wdf01000.sys本身并不导致高延迟，而是受到其他不稳定的驱动程序的影响，例如本案例中的ACPI.sys。
我们没有特别注意到高分辨率视频播放中的任何问题，尽管用户在处理实时音频和视频编辑工作流程时可能会遇到阻碍。
请看我们的 DPC延时排名页面，了解更多的评测设备的延迟比较。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
小米NoteBook Pro是我们测试的第一台采用YMTC PC005 Active NVMe SSD的笔记本电脑，该产品在2020年首次亮相。对于那些不了解情况的人来说，YMTC是中国本土的SSD制造商，拥有自主研发的3D Xtacking NAND。
PC005 Active的性能与西数PC SN730硬盘相当。然而，我们在队列深度为8的DiskSpd读取循环测试中发现了明显的节流问题。
小米在固态硬盘上欺骗了一个适当的散热垫，而只是把硬盘装在一个薄的金属外壳里。因此，尽管不能完全排除YMTC控制器本身的问题，但所看到的显著节流可能是由于固态硬盘上的散热不良造成的。
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro YMTC PC005 Active 512GB | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Realme Book (Slim) Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD | Average YMTC PC005 Active 512GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 0% | -5% | -164% | -10% | -38% | -20% | -29% | 0% | |
| Seq Read (MB/s) | 2633 | 2775 5% | 2015 -23% | 1972 -25% | 2127 -19% | 1960 -26% | 1784 -32% | 2349 -11% | 2633 ? 0% |
| Seq Write (MB/s) | 1390 | 1436 3% | 1055 -24% | 981 -29% | 1427 3% | 1547 11% | 742 -47% | 826 -41% | 1390 ? 0% |
| 4K Read (MB/s) | 44.62 | 49.34 11% | 73.9 66% | 55.8 25% | 52.5 18% | 31.56 -29% | 58.3 31% | 54.7 23% | 44.6 ? 0% |
| 4K Write (MB/s) | 132.3 | 198.3 50% | 223.2 69% | 133.5 1% | 122.9 -7% | 116.6 -12% | 141.9 7% | 162.1 23% | 132.3 ? 0% |
| 4K-64 Read (MB/s) | 966 | 1270 31% | 589 -39% | 1277 32% | 947 -2% | 454.7 -53% | 582 -40% | 788 -18% | 966 ? 0% |
| 4K-64 Write (MB/s) | 1194 | 846 -29% | 1029 -14% | 313.9 -74% | 1598 34% | 262.1 -78% | 1047 -12% | 832 -30% | 1194 ? 0% |
| Access Time Read * (ms) | 0.043 | 0.046 -7% | 0.056 -30% | 0.15 -249% | 0.072 -67% | 0.052 -21% | 0.125 -191% | 0.043 ? -0% | |
| Access Time Write * (ms) | 0.025 | 0.054 -116% | 0.039 -56% | 0.513 -1952% | 0.09 -260% | 0.034 -36% | 0.046 -84% | 0.023 8% | 0.025 ? -0% |
| Score Read (Points) | 1274 | 1597 25% | 865 -32% | 1530 20% | 1212 -5% | 682 -46% | 819 -36% | 1078 -15% | 1274 ? 0% |
| Score Write (Points) | 1465 | 1188 -19% | 1358 -7% | 546 -63% | 1864 27% | 533 -64% | 1263 -14% | 1077 -26% | 1465 ? 0% |
| Score Total (Points) | 3337 | 3541 6% | 2644 -21% | 2819 -16% | 3674 10% | 1552 -53% | 2469 -26% | 2645 -21% | 3337 ? 0% |
| Copy ISO MB/s (MB/s) | 2296 | 1768 -23% | 1186 -48% | 1105 -52% | 1605 -30% | 974 -58% | 1067 -54% | 1034 -55% | 2296 ? 0% |
| Copy Program MB/s (MB/s) | 422 | 532 26% | 782 85% | 799 89% | 847 101% | 356.5 -16% | 597 41% | 349.4 -17% | 422 ? 0% |
| Copy Game MB/s (MB/s) | 998 | 1413 42% | 1028 3% | 957 -4% | 1632 64% | 621 -38% | 1019 2% | 698 -30% | 998 ? 0% |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 1% | -11% | -18% | -11% | -28% | -33% | -16% | 0% | |
| Write 4K (MB/s) | 159 | 136.4 -14% | 171.8 8% | 136 -14% | 119.7 -25% | 98.8 -38% | 94.8 -40% | 147.1 -7% | 159 ? 0% |
| Read 4K (MB/s) | 52.5 | 45.68 -13% | 79.4 51% | 60.4 15% | 45.28 -14% | 32.44 -38% | 48.93 -7% | 56 7% | 52.5 ? 0% |
| Write Seq (MB/s) | 1718 | 2151 25% | 1099 -36% | 1447 -16% | 1951 14% | 1582 -8% | 1059 -38% | 1175 -32% | 1718 ? 0% |
| Read Seq (MB/s) | 2586 | 2062 -20% | 1847 -29% | 1507 -42% | 2252 -13% | 1471 -43% | 1620 -37% | 1810 -30% | 2586 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 (MB/s) | 477.6 | 515 8% | 539 13% | 235.6 -51% | 438.1 -8% | 375.4 -21% | 400 -16% | 447.3 -6% | 478 ? 0% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 (MB/s) | 539 | 537 0% | 555 3% | 737 37% | 312.8 -42% | 491.9 -9% | 377.2 -30% | 493.9 -8% | 539 ? 0% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 (MB/s) | 2483 | 3093 25% | 1095 -56% | 1529 -38% | 2348 -5% | 1574 -37% | 1136 -54% | 1234 -50% | 2483 ? 0% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 (MB/s) | 3446 | 3386 -2% | 1988 -42% | 2357 -32% | 3529 2% | 2329 -32% | 2073 -40% | 3102 -10% | 3446 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 (MB/s) | 490.8 | 496.1 1% | 491 ? 0% | ||||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 (MB/s) | 1133 | 902 -20% | 1133 ? 0% | ||||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
1% | -8% /
-7% | -91% /
-111% | -11% /
-10% | -33% /
-34% | -27% /
-25% | -23% /
-23% | 0% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
与RedmiBook Pro 15不同，Mi NoteBook Pro没有独立的GPU，所以它必须依靠集成的Iris Xe Graphics G7。iGPU的性能并不真正令人信服。我们看到宏碁Swift 3和联想IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro采用相同的芯片，在3DMark测试中的得分要高得多。
在强度较低的测试中，如3DMarkCloud Gate 和Ice Storm Extreme，Acer Swift 3采用的是AMD Ryzen 7 4700U和Radeon RX Vega 7图形处理器，成功地取得了对小米NoteBook Pro的适当领先。
在电池运行时，只观察到3DMarkTime Spy 分数略微下降了2%。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6498 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 64072 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16724 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3656 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1707 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1502 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
我们在游戏基准测试中也看到性能下降。小米NoteBook Pro落后于具有类似规格的竞争对手，即使是在不太费力的游戏中，如Dota 2。Reborn和Strange Brigade。在所有的X-Plane 11测试中，该设备的帧数一直最少。
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21.4 - 225, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=189) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11.4 - 181.1, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 31.2, n=185) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 144.4, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.15 - 27.8, n=178) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (110 - 142.3, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (85.7 - 100.5, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (66.8 - 114.7, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (21 - 32.8, n=2) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro | |
Witcher 3 FPS图表
在TheWitcher 3 1080p Ultra的压力测试中，我们没有注意到很多节流现象。尽管如此，这不是一台可以用来玩游戏的笔记本电脑，除非目标是在低设置下用旧游戏进行休闲游戏。
请看我们的专用 Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs页面，了解更多的比较和基准测试。
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 110 | 85.7 | 66.8 | 21.04 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 69.9 | 47 | 23.3 | 12 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 113.9 | 62.4 | 43.4 | 42.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 35.1 | 18.5 | 14.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 25.8 | 23.6 | 21.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 72.3 | 26.7 | 22.7 | 18.6 |
Emissions: Erratic power allocation to the SoC
系统噪音
小米NoteBook Pro并不是目前最安静的搭载酷睿i7-11370H的笔记本电脑。不同测试场景下的整体噪音水平似乎高于竞争对手，这意味着小米有进一步调整风扇的空间。然而，空闲时的噪音水平相当低。
也就是说，在大多数常规使用情况下，风扇几乎不启动。 在测试期间，我们没有观察到任何咔哒声或杂音。
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 7% | 1% | 5% | -1% | -0% | -6% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 27.52 | 24.6 11% | 26 6% | 25 9% | 25.9 6% | 31.2 -13% | 26 6% | 28.8 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 27.52 | 24.7 10% | 26 6% | 25 9% | 26 6% | 31.2 -13% | 26 6% | 28.8 -5% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 27.52 | 24.7 10% | 26 6% | 26 6% | 26 6% | 31.2 -13% | 26 6% | 28.8 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 27.52 | 24.7 10% | 27.7 -1% | 27 2% | 26 6% | 31.2 -13% | 31.6 -15% | 28.8 -5% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 37.03 | 30.8 17% | 32.7 12% | 43 -16% | 34.9 6% | 33.8 9% | 41 -11% | 41.66 -13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 41.09 | 33 20% | 42 -2% | 34.5 16% | 36.3 12% | 43.15 -5% | ||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 44.19 | 46.4 -5% | 39 12% | 44 -0% | 48.7 -10% | 33.5 24% | 41 7% | 44.58 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise level
| Idle |
| 27.52 / 27.52 / 27.52 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 37.03 / 44.19 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 27.52 dB(A) | ||
温度
全金属结构确实使其在负载下的表面温度有所提高。小米NoteBook Pro只提供一个单风扇，但有两个来自处理器的热管。铰链阻挡了右侧的唯一风扇的排气，导致该区域的热量积聚。
我们观察到，设备的左上方在压力下会发热，而触摸板和右掌托则保持相对冷却。
现实世界的条件不可能给笔记本带来那么大的压力，所以只要你不太用力，在腿上使用该设备应该不会造成太大的问题。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.74 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-9.3 °C / -16.7 F).
压力测试
我们的压力测试表明，小米NoteBook Pro在负载下对SoC的功率分配难以保持一致。这可能解释了我们看到的与其他搭载Core i7-11370H的设备相比的较低分数。
在空闲状态下，CPU能够达到其额定的提升频率。用Prime95原地大FFT给系统施加压力，使时钟下降到大约3GHz，这接近3.3GHz的额定基本时钟，封装功率达到了PL1的限制。然而，冷却系统在这里似乎很吃力，封装温度达到接近83℃。
添加FurMark进一步减少了CPU的可用空间，因为它现在不得不与iGPU分享可用的功率。因此，在运行的大部分时间里，CPU的时钟下降到大约1.6GHz，而iGPU可以提升到1GHz。封装功率增加到30W，以满足iGPU的要求，而封装温度在70℃和75℃之间徘徊。
在1080p Ultra下使用 Witcher 3，我们看到Core i7-11370H偶尔可以达到4.5 GHz大关，而GPU则相对稳定在1.35 GHz，尽管在运行后期封装功率略有下降，达到约25 W。
| 压力测试 | CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | 平均CPU核心温度(℃) | 平均封装温度(℃) |
| 系统空闲 | 4.78 | 100 | 39 | 44 |
| Prime95 | 2.49 | 100 | 60 | 66 |
| Prime95 + FurMark | 1.69 | 1,000 | 61 | 67 |
| Witcher 3 | 3.32 | 1.35 | 60 | 67 |
这款笔记本电脑的表弟，即红米书Pro 15也存在类似的TDP问题，但它至少有一个独立的NvidiaGeForce MX450卡。虽然GeForce MX450不一定能击败Iris Xe Graphics G7但它在游戏中证明是有优势的，同时有助于缓解iGPU所面临的性能障碍。
发言人
内置扬声器的音量相当大，最大音量为80.7 dB(A)。与大多数笔记本电脑的扬声器一样，Mi NoteBook Pro的一对立体声扬声器在再现低频时也很吃力。然而，中音和高音是相当平衡的，所以人声和高音都听得很清楚，没有太多的失真。
内置的麦克风很简单，没有任何花哨的AI降噪效果。只要你离设备不太远，它就能很好地捕捉到声音。
小米包括一个DTS音频处理应用程序，用于应用一些预置。那些希望获得更好音频质量的人可以使用3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙。
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Energy Management: Higher power draws and decent battery life
消耗功率
与其他搭载Core i7-11370H的设备相比，空闲功耗很好。我们观察到在不同的负载情况下，功耗比竞争对手高。小米NoteBook Pro在最大负荷下消耗了近65W的峰值功率。也就是说，提供的65W USB Type-C电源适配器能够在压力下为设备提供足够的电力。
| Off / Standby | 0.57 / 1.21 Watt |
| Idle | 3.38 / 8 / 9.78 Watt |
| Load |
41.29 / 64.75 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 i7-11370H, GeForce MX450 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7 | HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7 | Realme Book (Slim) i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | 6% | -48% | -76% | 25% | 22% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.38 | 4.8 -42% | 4.8 -42% | 6 -78% | 4.2 -24% | 2.8 17% | 4.2 -24% | 5.42 -60% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8 | 7.9 1% | 7.4 7% | 9 -13% | 18.3 -129% | 4.8 40% | 6.3 21% | 10.38 -30% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 9.78 | 8.6 12% | 9 8% | 12 -23% | 19.2 -96% | 6.7 31% | 7 28% | 11.17 -14% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 41.29 | 46.5 -13% | 34.9 15% | 74 -79% | 72.9 -77% | 28 32% | 27.7 33% | 38.58 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 45.7 | 43 6% | 34.9 24% | 70.7 -55% | 61.5 -35% | 57 -25% | 27.7 39% | 39.7 13% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 64.75 | 67.4 -4% | 51.4 21% | 91 -41% | 127.8 -97% | 31 52% | 42 35% | 47.58 27% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
电池寿命
小米NoteBook Pro的运行时间并不特别出色，尽管它们应该差不多足够让你度过一个正常的工作日。在我们的标准Wi-Fi电池测试中，在150cd/m2的亮度下，我们测得了大约8小时12分钟的备份时间，这还算不错的。宏碁Swift 3具有相同的处理器和电池容量，提供明显更好的备份，特别是在压力下。
任何额外的负载都会使电池寿命大幅下降。捆绑的电源适配器可以在大约1.5小时内为笔记本电脑充满电。
| Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 61 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 i7-11370H, GeForce MX450, 70 Wh | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 63.3 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7, 48.85 Wh | HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7, 41 Wh | Realme Book (Slim) i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 17% | 53% | 3% | 78% | 78% | 6% | 34% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 10 | 14.8 48% | 20.1 101% | 10.8 8% | 27.7 177% | 23.2 132% | 11.3 13% | 17.4 74% |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 8.2 | 8.4 2% | 9.8 20% | 8.2 0% | 10.8 32% | 11.9 45% | 8.5 4% | 8.4 2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra (h) | 1.5 | 2.2 47% | 1.5 0% | 2 33% | ||||
| Load (h) | 1.2 | 1.2 0% | 1.7 42% | 1.2 0% | 1.5 25% | 1.9 58% | 1.5 25% |
Pros
Cons
结论：不是迄今为止我们看到的性能最好的Tiger Lake-H35笔记本电脑
随着小米NoteBook Pro的推出，小米试图在小米NoteBook 14地平线版所获得的势头上再接再厉。 小米NoteBook 14地平线版.为此，制造商为小米NoteBook Pro配备了2021年的最新组件。全铝机箱结构良好，看起来很高档，几乎没有干扰，而且有一个体面的端口选择。显示屏如宣传的那样工作，提供稳定的视角，而且似乎没有任何PWM，这是一个绝对的优点。
由于某些原因， 酷睿i7-11370H处理器似乎没有在一致的功率水平下运行，导致在合成和现实世界的基准测试中，与竞争对手相比，如 联想IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro和 Acer Swift 3这些产品的硬件基本相似。
这意味着你不能完全从这个芯片中提取最大的性能。由于这种不稳定的能源管理，iGPU的性能也受到影响。 也就是说，这些缺陷只在基准测试中变得明显，而普通用户对于基本的生产力需求几乎不会注意到任何问题。
小米NoteBook Pro在纸面上和第一眼就给人留下了好印象。然而，小米未能充分利用酷睿i7-11370H，使小米NoteBook Pro与对手相比处于劣势"。
在其他方面也有很好的改进空间。首先，我们希望看到稳定的Wi-Fi性能和更好的SSD冷却。单个风扇应该足以满足预期的使用情况，但它可以从进一步的调整中受益，以减少整体噪音并改善热力。电源消耗也可以更经济。电池运行时间，虽然可以接受，但对于给定的规格来说，没有什么不正常的。
总的来说，Mi NoteBook Pro本身绝对不是一个坏设备。然而，目前73,999英镑（993美元）的售价可能被证明是我们所遇到的问题的一个障碍。如果你的计算需求是最小的，你可以考虑选择 酷睿i5-11300H版本的小米NoteBook Pro，并在这个过程中节省约13,000英镑（174美元）。另一个可以考虑的选择是酷睿i5版本的红米本15 Pro，尽管有全高清显示屏，但价格要便宜得多（47,999英镑/644美元）。
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
- 12/29/2021 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Price comparison
