Notebookcheck Logo

小米NoteBook Pro笔记本电脑评测。残缺的酷睿i7-11370H限制了其他良好的设备

所有这些都是铝,并不快。 小米NoteBook Pro力图成为一款值得信赖的中端产品,拥有优质的全铝机身,良好的2.5K 16:10显示屏,以及体面的规格表。虽然小米NoteBook Pro在大多数情况下肯定能完成工作,但彻底调查后发现,小米无法从酷睿i7-11370H中提取最大可能的性能,而要价为73,999(993美元)。
Chinese Tech Tiger Lake Laptop / Notebook

自从推出 小米NoteBook 14地平线版2020年,小米一直试图在中端笔记本电脑细分市场上为自己打出一片天地。几个月前,小米 推出了几个月前,小米在印度市场推出了两款新笔记本电脑--小米NoteBook Pro和小米NoteBook Ultra。我们带来了小米NoteBook Pro进行评测。

小米NoteBook Pro是一款14英寸笔记本电脑,类似于 RedmiBook Pro 15在更多方面。我们的测试样本是由英特尔Tiger Lake-H35 酷睿i7-11370H,16GB DDR4-3200内存,以及512GB NVMe SSD,这是Pro系列的最大可配置选项。这个配置将使你花费73,999英镑(993美元)。

在这篇评论中,我们对Mi NoteBook Pro进行了测试,看看这款笔记本电脑的性能是否和它的外观一样好。

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro (Mi Notebook Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11370H 4 x 3.3 - 4.8 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H35
Graphics adapter
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-3200 Dual-Channel, Timings: 22-22-22-52
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 216 PPI, Panda LM140GF1L02, Oxide TFT-LCD FFS, 178° Wide-viewing angle, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
YMTC PC005 Active 512GB, 512 GB 
, 438 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 1x 3.5 mm combo audio jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.3 x 315.6 x 220.4
Battery
56 Wh Lithium-Polymer, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 11 h
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2W Stereo speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Mi Support, MIUI+, Xiaomi Cloud, Macro Key, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.4 kg
Price
853 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.7 %
12/2021
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg17.3 mm14.00"2560x1600
86.9 %
10/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg16.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
86.4 %
10/2021
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg15.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
83.2 %
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
1.7 kg16 mm15.60"3200x2000
86.5 %
02/2021
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1.6 kg17.9 mm14.00"1920x1200
86.5 %
06/2020
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7
1.2 kg16.55 mm14.00"1920x1080
76.9 %
09/2021
HP 14s-fq1357ng
R5 5500U, Vega 7
1.5 kg17.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
81.3 %
10/2021
realme Book (Slim)
i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
1.4 kg14.9 mm14.00"2160x1440

外壳。高级全铝机箱

最近,我们已经看到一个健康的趋势,即中档笔记本电脑,如 笔记本(超薄)以及小米NoteBook Pro和Ultra系列都采用了全金属结构。据小米称,小米NoteBook Pro采用一体式设计,由航空级6系列铝材制成,经过CNC加工和阳极氧化处理,看起来很高档。然而,底部面板是由塑料制成的。

因此,Mi NoteBook Pro感觉很好,没有尖锐的边缘或分散注意力的设计元素。全铝结构提供了轻量级的额外好处,笔记本电脑的重量仅为1.4公斤。

铰链足够结实,可以用一根手指打开盖子。盖子不会晃动,扭曲的程度可以忽略不计。键盘甲板也相当坚硬,但当用力按下时,它可能会有一点弯曲。总的来说,小米NoteBook Pro的结构没有什么可抱怨的地方。

367.8 mm 236.1 mm 15.9 mm 1.7 kg351 mm 242 mm 16 mm 1.7 kg324 mm 225 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg323.4 mm 218.9 mm 16.55 mm 1.2 kg315.6 mm 220.4 mm 17.3 mm 1.4 kg313.1 mm 224 mm 17.9 mm 1.6 kg312.4 mm 221.4 mm 16.9 mm 1.4 kg307.21 mm 228.96 mm 14.9 mm 1.4 kg

连接性。涵盖基本内容

小米NoteBook Pro没有提供太多的端口,但它确实照顾到了基本要素。在左边,我们发现一个USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C端口,一个HDMI 1.4输出,USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A,和雷电4。在右边,我们发现唯一的USB 2.0 Type-A端口和一个3.5毫米组合音频插孔。该设备上的所有Type-C接口都支持USB供电,所以没有专门的充电端口可用。

我们在访问这些端口或将各种外围设备连接到这些端口时没有遇到任何障碍。也就是说,没有内置的microSD读卡器或Kensington锁插槽可用。

左边:USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C端口,HDMI 1.4输出,USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A,Thunderbolt 4
左边:USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C端口,HDMI 1.4输出,USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A,Thunderbolt 4
右边:3.5毫米组合音频插孔,USB 2.0 Type-A
右边:3.5毫米组合音频插孔,USB 2.0 Type-A

沟通

英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201总体上提供了良好的传输速率
英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201总体上提供了良好的传输速率

我们的测试设备配备了英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201无线局域网卡和蓝牙5.1。我们注意到,在离我们的参考Netgear Nighthawk AX12 RAX120路由器1米远的地方,下载速度很好。

无线性能对于大多数使用情况来说应该是足够的。 然而,上传速度不稳定,即使在多次重复测试后,该卡的上传速度也有些偏低。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 (686min - 1498max) MBit/s ∼100% +77%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1192 (526min - 1384max) MBit/s ∼84% +48%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1126 (552min - 1223max) MBit/s ∼79% +40%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1084 (1013min - 1134max) MBit/s ∼76% +35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (277 - 1497, n=70, last 2 years)
1056 MBit/s ∼74% +31%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
804 (316min - 976max) MBit/s ∼57%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
772 (676min - 884max) MBit/s ∼54% -4%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
660 (642min - 680max) MBit/s ∼46% -18%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
287 (152min - 308max) MBit/s ∼20% -64%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1571 (1417min - 1659max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1343 (650min - 1573max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1336 (1246min - 1419max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1314 (1233min - 1359max) MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1311 (1144min - 1450max) MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (137 - 1684, n=70, last 2 years)
1151 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1150 (1108min - 1215max) MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
904 (879min - 923max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
296 (271min - 305max) MBit/s ∼19% -81%
3163664164665165666166667167668168669169661016106611161166121612661316136614161466151615661616Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1571 (1417-1659)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (1144-1450)
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø794 (316-976)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1084 (1013-1134)

网络摄像头

在环境光线良好的情况下,720p的摄像头可以完成偶尔的视频通话的工作。即使在良好的环境照明条件下,颜色也显示出高偏差。低光下的图像会出现噪音,而且清晰度也不是特别好,这一点从我们下面的测试图中可以看出。

ColorChecker
9.4 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
15 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro: 12.23 ∆E min: 1.87 - max: 23.76 ∆E

安全问题

小米在小米NoteBook Pro的电源按钮中加入了一个指纹传感器。指纹传感器与Windows Hello一起工作,在日常使用中反应相当灵敏。一个独立的TPM 2.0模块存在,这使得该设备有资格获得Windows 11升级,事实上,在测试期间,小米NoteBook Pro已经获得了这一资格。

辅料

除了65W的USB-C电源适配器和通常的文书工作外,盒子里没有其他附件。

维护

没有专门的维修挡板。卸下底部的八颗Torx T5螺丝,就可以将底板移开。

Wi-Fi卡和NVMe固态硬盘是用户可更换的,但内存模块是焊接在主板上的。没有额外的驱动器托架或M.2插槽用于存储扩展。

小米NoteBook Pro似乎使用了与红米Book Pro 15相同的主板。 红米Book Pro 15.由于小米NoteBook Pro没有配备专用的 NvidiaGeForce MX450图形,因此放置GPU和GDDR6 VRAM芯片的区域似乎没有使用。

小米NoteBook Pro的内部结构
小米NoteBook Pro的内部结构

担保

小米为Mi NoteBook Pro提供一年的标准保修。在结账时,买家可以选择延长保修期一年,价格为2,699英镑(36美元),或两年,价格为3,699英镑(49美元)。此外,还可以购买有效期为一年的意外伤害液体损害(ADLD)计划,价格为4,099英镑(54美元)。

输入设备。安静的按键和僵硬的触摸板

键盘

小米提供了一个体面的键盘,有标准尺寸的按键。键盘提供了安静的打字体验,但1.3毫米的键程感觉有点浅,没有提供很多触觉反馈。此外,触摸打字员可能会觉得键盘提供的阻力比他们习惯的要大一些。有一个两级背光,可以在黑暗中实现良好的按键可读性。

没有切换性能模式的特殊按键。然而,在顶行的末端有一个专门的宏键,可以激活捆绑的宏键应用程序中定义的宏。

触摸板

12.5厘米×8.3厘米的触摸板为舒适的导航提供了很大的面积,并支持WindowsPrecision 驱动程序,以实现流畅的手势。左右点击按钮与触摸板齐平,点击声音不大。然而,在我们的测试样品中,触摸板按钮特别僵硬。随着时间的推移,僵硬程度确实有所降低,但你可能最好使用一个外部鼠标。

小米NoteBook Pro的触摸板按钮按起来感觉比正常情况下更硬
小米NoteBook Pro的触摸板按钮按起来感觉比正常情况下更硬

显示。体面的FFS面板,没有PWM

我们的小米NoteBook Pro单元采用熊猫LM140GF1L02 14英寸16:10面板,分辨率为2560x1600,亮度为300尼特,刷新率为60赫兹。小米称这是一块IPS面板,但在网上快速搜索后发现,这实际上是一块带有边缘场开关(FFS)的氧化物TFT-LCD。然而,它确实提供了典型IPS显示屏的优点。

长时间的曝光显示了角落里明显的背光渗漏。亮度分布为87%,还算不错。

子像素排列
子像素排列
在长时间曝光的情况下,在角落里看到明显的背光渗出。
在长时间曝光的情况下,在角落里看到明显的背光渗出。
322
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Panda LM140GF1L02
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 371 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 337.6 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 364 cd/m²
Contrast: 1686:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.82 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 1.21
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Panda LM140GF1L02, Oxide TFT-LCD FFS, 14.00, 2560x1600
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
LEN140WQ+, IPS, 14.00, 2880x1800
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 16.10, 1920x1080
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
IPS, 15.60, 3200x2000
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1200
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AUO403D, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
realme Book (Slim)
Chi Mei P140ZKA-BZ1, IPS, 14.00, 2160x1440
Display
11%
2%
1%
11%
-43%
-41%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
66.2
76.9
16%
66.6
1%
66.7
1%
77.1
16%
37.2
-44%
38.11
-42%
66.6
1%
sRGB Coverage
95.8
99.8
4%
99.5
4%
96.3
1%
99.8
4%
55.9
-42%
57
-41%
97.8
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67
76.7
14%
68.5
2%
68.5
2%
76.7
14%
38.43
-43%
39.37
-41%
68.2
2%
Response Times
-3%
9%
-4%
-92%
-15%
-20%
6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37.33 ?(16.58, 20.75)
36.4 ?(18, 18.4)
2%
32 ?(15, 17)
14%
34.8 ?(17.2, 17.6)
7%
61.2 ?(30, 31.2)
-64%
41 ?(19, 22)
-10%
41 ?(19, 22)
-10%
33.26 ?(14.92, 18.34)
11%
Response Time Black / White *
20.91 ?(10.7, 10.21)
22.4 ?(10, 12.4)
-7%
20 ?(11, 9)
4%
24 ?(12.4, 11.6)
-15%
46 ?(24, 22)
-120%
25 ?(14, 11)
-20%
27 ?(15, 12)
-29%
20.62 ?(11.52, 9.1)
1%
PWM Frequency
2500 ?(10)
58500 ?(10)
Screen
18%
24%
-21%
9%
-51%
-3%
3%
Brightness middle
371
410
11%
304
-18%
312
-16%
412
11%
269
-27%
220
-41%
403.52
9%
Brightness
338
395
17%
284
-16%
298
-12%
392
16%
244
-28%
223
-34%
390
15%
Brightness Distribution
87
91
5%
88
1%
87
0%
81
-7%
83
-5%
85
-2%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.22
0.29
-32%
0.165
25%
0.18
18%
0.32
-45%
0.23
-5%
0.225
-2%
0.27
-23%
Contrast
1686
1414
-16%
1842
9%
1733
3%
1288
-24%
1170
-31%
978
-42%
1495
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.82
3.24
33%
1.44
70%
5.39
-12%
1.88
61%
4.94
-2%
4.16
14%
5.23
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.35
5.26
44%
3.62
61%
9.95
-6%
3.06
67%
20.37
-118%
7.43
21%
9.69
-4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.21
0.41
66%
3.15
-160%
1.96
-62%
5.03
-316%
0.62
49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.2
4.2
32%
2.6
58%
6.3
-2%
2.2
65%
1.71
72%
2.35
62%
6.5
-5%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.18 101%
2.41 91%
2.192 100%
2.1 105%
2.52 87%
2.62 84%
2.08 106%
CCT
8320 78%
6012 108%
6527 100%
7473 87%
6650 98%
6535 99%
6389 102%
7727 84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68.5
69
68.7
35
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5
96
99.8
56
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / 14%
12% / 17%
-8% / -14%
-24% / -5%
-36% / -44%
-21% / -14%
4% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

小米宣称小米NoteBook Pro的sRGB覆盖率为100%;我们测量的结果接近96%,这还是不错的。Adobe RGB和DCI-P3的覆盖率与这个价格范围内的预期差不多。

Colorchecker的平均Delta E值为4.82,开箱即用的色彩准确度没有什么可写的,显示屏看起来比我们希望的要冷一些。然而,我们的校准程序有助于大幅提高色彩准确性,使平均Delta E值达到1.21。

读者可以从上面的链接下载校准后的ICC配置文件。

显示质量对于一般的多媒体消费,甚至对于基本的照片或视频编辑工作流程来说都是很好的。任何更严肃的事情,都可能从具有更广泛色域覆盖的外部显示器中受益。

vs. sRGB - 95.8%的覆盖率
vs. sRGB - 95.8%的覆盖率
vs. Adobe RGB - 67%的覆盖率
vs. Adobe RGB - 67%的覆盖率
对比DCI-P3 - 66.2%的覆盖率
对比DCI-P3 - 66.2%的覆盖率
校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频

我们测量了20.91毫秒黑色到白色和37.33毫秒50%灰色到80%灰色的综合响应时间。这些不是特别理想,但Mi NoteBook Pro不是针对游戏用户的,所以较高的响应时间在日常使用中不应该有太大的影响。

小米表示,该面板使用直流调光来控制显示器的背光。然而,我们在所有亮度水平上没有测量到任何可感知的PWM或直流调光频率,这对眼睛敏感的用户来说是个好消息。

请看我们的文章,"为什么脉冲宽度调制(PWM)是如此令人头痛"以了解更多信息,以及我们的 PWM排名表以了解所有评测设备的PWM和响应时间的概况。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.7 ms rise
↘ 10.21 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.58 ms rise
↘ 20.75 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected ≤ 100 % brightness setting

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

只要阳光不直接落在屏幕上,哑光显示屏在户外也能保持良好的可读性。即使从极端角度看,也没有可察觉的色彩或亮度损失。

在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
阴天情况下的室外
阴天情况下的室外
相对稳定的可视角度
相对稳定的可视角度

性能。酷睿i7-11370H未完全弯曲

我们的测试样本由4C/8T的 英特尔酷睿i7-11370H Tiger Lake-H35处理器。买家可以为小米NoteBook Pro配置一个酷睿i5-11300H也是如此。这两种配置都缺乏任何形式的独立显卡。

 
 

处理器

小米NoteBook Pro并没有充分利用酷睿i7-11370H的潜力
小米NoteBook Pro并没有充分利用酷睿i7-11370H的潜力

酷睿i7-11370H的PL1为28W,插电时的PL2为64W。28 W的PL1意味着该处理器可以提供3 GHz的基础时钟,最大提升到4.8 GHz。使用电池时,PL1降至25W。

我们在Cinebench R15多循环测试中观察到良好的持续性能。然而,小米在Mi NoteBook Pro中实施的Core i7-11370H并不是我们所见过的最快的。在 联想IdeaPad Slim 7i ProAcer Swift 3采用相同的处理器,性能明显提高。

没有提供特殊的电源或性能模式,所以你将不得不依赖Windows电池滑块。

Cinebench R20显示电池电量的单核得分下降
Cinebench R20显示电池电量的单核得分下降

电池上的PL1有所减少,确实对单核性能有很大影响。快速的Cinebench R20运行显示,在电池供电的情况下,单核得分减少了24%,而多核得分或多或少保持不变。

请看我们专门的酷睿i7-11370H网页,了解相关信息和基准测试。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

765.3825.3885.3945.31005.31065.3Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø838 (829.86-923.19)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1020 (1012.38-1037.83)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø926 (914.45-1017.58)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit; Variable PL1 : Ø928 (765.3-1048.55)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit; Pl1 @ 25W: Ø792 (781.11-959.72)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit; PL1 fixed @ 28W: Ø849 (836.45-917.33)
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø919 (891.54-924.6)
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø996 (940.2-1110.59)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (961 - 7040, n=104, last 2 years)
3051 Points ∼100% +49%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
2548 Points ∼84% +24%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
2401 Points ∼79% +17%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
2382 Points ∼78% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
2299 Points ∼75% +12%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
2223 Points ∼73% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1438 - 2578, n=10)
2181 Points ∼71% +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
2152 Points ∼71% +5%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
2047 Points ∼67%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
1033 Points ∼34% -50%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
601 Points ∼100% +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
592 Points ∼99% +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
589 Points ∼98% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (475 - 601, n=10)
564 Points ∼94% 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
563 Points ∼94%
Average of class Multimedia
  (316 - 739, n=104, last 2 years)
534 Points ∼89% -5%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
515 Points ∼86% -9%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
503 Points ∼84% -11%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
466 Points ∼78% -17%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
452 Points ∼75% -20%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (3121 - 18444, n=96, last 2 years)
8425 Points ∼100% +55%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
6646 (6493.56min - 6646.41max) Points ∼79% +23%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
6394 Points ∼76% +18%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
6182 Points ∼73% +14%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
6136 (5867.5min - 6136.37max) Points ∼73% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3696 - 6646, n=11)
5648 Points ∼67% +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5639 Points ∼67% +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5344 (4894.88min - 5344.23max) Points ∼63% -1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
5420 Points ∼64%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
2725 Points ∼32% -50%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1556 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
1553 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1529 Points ∼98% +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
1478 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1081 - 1556, n=10)
1463 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (819 - 1940, n=90, last 2 years)
1421 Points ∼91% -4%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1337 Points ∼86% -10%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
1242 Points ∼80% -16%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1167 Points ∼75% -21%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (385 - 2894, n=119, last 2 years)
1381 Points ∼100% +50%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1112 (946.23min - 1112.47max) Points ∼81% +20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1049 (765.3min - 1048.55max) Points ∼76% +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
960 (781.11min - 959.72max) Points ∼70% +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
917 (836.45min - 917.33max) Points ∼66% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
1038 (1012.38min - 1037.83max) Points ∼75% +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1035 Points ∼75% +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1018 (914.45min - 1017.58max) Points ∼74% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (606 - 1086, n=16)
940 Points ∼68% +2%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
925 (891.54min - 924.6max) Points ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
923 (829.86min - 923.19max) Points ∼67%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
507 (462.5min - 507.21max) Points ∼37% -45%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
231 Points ∼99% +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
232 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
229 Points ∼98% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (206 - 233, n=13)
224 Points ∼96% +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
220 Points ∼94%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 279, n=100, last 2 years)
209 Points ∼90% -5%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
198 Points ∼85% -10%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
197 Points ∼85% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
180 Points ∼77% -18%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
177 Points ∼76% -20%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
966 Seconds * ∼100% -72%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
563 Seconds * ∼58%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (451 - 762, n=10)
541 Seconds * ∼56% +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
538 Seconds * ∼56% +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
524 Seconds * ∼54% +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
507 Seconds * ∼52% +10%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
499 Seconds * ∼52% +11%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
490 Seconds * ∼51% +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
458 Seconds * ∼47% +19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (183.3 - 1188, n=102, last 2 years)
450 Seconds * ∼47% +20%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5411 MIPS ∼100% +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
5393 MIPS ∼100% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
5317 MIPS ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
5298 MIPS ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (5074 - 5550, n=10)
5288 MIPS ∼98% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2898 - 6186, n=101, last 2 years)
5099 MIPS ∼94% -4%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4694 MIPS ∼87% -11%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
4599 MIPS ∼85% -13%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4292 MIPS ∼79% -19%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
4268 MIPS ∼79% -19%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia
  (11122 - 72912, n=101, last 2 years)
35093 MIPS ∼100% +45%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
31060 MIPS ∼89% +28%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
27015 MIPS ∼77% +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
26652 MIPS ∼76% +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
25382 MIPS ∼72% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (18961 - 28520, n=10)
25106 MIPS ∼72% +4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
24192 MIPS ∼69%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
24188 MIPS ∼69% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
23914 MIPS ∼68% -1%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
13422 MIPS ∼38% -45%
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1607 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1574 Points ∼98% +1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
1562 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1376 - 1607, n=9)
1542 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (843 - 1887, n=102, last 2 years)
1448 Points ∼90% -7%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1406 Points ∼87% -10%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
1352 Points ∼84% -13%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1119 Points ∼70% -28%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1101 Points ∼69% -30%
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (2427 - 14376, n=102, last 2 years)
6863 Points ∼100% +35%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
6115 Points ∼89% +20%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
5523 Points ∼80% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (4575 - 6115, n=9)
5416 Points ∼79% +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5214 Points ∼76% +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
5088 Points ∼74%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4792 Points ∼70% -6%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4695 Points ∼68% -8%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
2983 Points ∼43% -41%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 21, n=101, last 2 years)
9.51 fps ∼100% +40%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.6 fps ∼90% +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
7.81 fps ∼82% +15%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
7.7 fps ∼81% +13%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
7.6 fps ∼80% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (4.98 - 8.82, n=10)
7.38 fps ∼78% +9%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
7.23 fps ∼76% +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
6.91 fps ∼73% +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
6.8 fps ∼72%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
3.99 fps ∼42% -41%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
67.3 s * ∼100% -48%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
59.8 s * ∼89% -31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30.2 - 99.2, n=99, last 2 years)
52.5 s * ∼78% -15%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
51.9 s * ∼77% -14%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
49.6 s * ∼74% -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.5 s * ∼71% -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.3 s * ∼70% -4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
45.5 s * ∼68%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (23.6 - 56.5, n=10)
45.3 s * ∼67% -0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
41.1 s * ∼61% +10%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
realme Book (Slim)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
0.636 sec * ∼100% -12%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.634 sec * ∼100% -11%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
0.629 sec * ∼99% -10%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
0.622 sec * ∼98% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4155 - 1.002, n=102, last 2 years)
0.589 sec * ∼93% -3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.57 sec * ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (0.544 - 0.596, n=10)
0.565 sec * ∼89% +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.552 sec * ∼87% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.552 sec * ∼87% +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.548 sec * ∼86% +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
923 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
96.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
220 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia
 
91.4 pt ∼91%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
85.2 pt ∼85%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
80.6 pt ∼81%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
78.3 pt ∼78%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
 
76.6 pt ∼77%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
76.4 pt ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
73 pt ∼73%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia
  (2677 - 15700, n=78, last 2 years)
8716 KRay/s ∼100% +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8256 KRay/s ∼95% +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
8076 KRay/s ∼93% +14%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
7628 KRay/s ∼88% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (5204 - 8413, n=9)
7403 KRay/s ∼85% +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
7253 KRay/s ∼83% +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7055 KRay/s ∼81%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
46732 Points ∼100% +58%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12762 - 98165, n=78, last 2 years)
44476 Points ∼95% +51%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
41815 Points ∼89% +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
33876 Points ∼72% +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
32510 Points ∼70% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (23958 - 34020, n=9)
31363 Points ∼67% +6%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
29538 Points ∼63%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2289 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (841 - 4254, n=78, last 2 years)
2218 MB/s ∼97% +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
2212 MB/s ∼97% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1656 - 2297, n=9)
2114 MB/s ∼92% +8%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1952 MB/s ∼85%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
1445 MB/s ∼63% -26%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
1354 MB/s ∼59% -31%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Multimedia
  (31314 - 107161, n=78, last 2 years)
70713 Points ∼100% +34%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
68309 Points ∼97% +29%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52930 Points ∼75%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52840 Points ∼75% 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
52760 Points ∼75% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (47895 - 52930, n=9)
51753 Points ∼73% -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
45665 Points ∼65% -14%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
9007 Points ∼100% +82%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
7320 Points ∼81% +48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3099 - 12542, n=78, last 2 years)
7319 Points ∼81% +48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5023 Points ∼56% +1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4950 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
4839 Points ∼54% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3755 - 5027, n=9)
4793 Points ∼53% -3%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
25410 Points ∼100% +43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7417 - 54148, n=78, last 2 years)
24439 Points ∼96% +37%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
21894 Points ∼86% +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
20380 Points ∼80% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (14433 - 20417, n=9)
18643 Points ∼73% +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
18600 Points ∼73% +4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
17805 Points ∼70%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
76866 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
73305 MB/s ∼95% +5%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69857 MB/s ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (44267 - 76866, n=9)
69338 MB/s ∼90% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13739 - 147249, n=78, last 2 years)
63844 MB/s ∼83% -9%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
45567 MB/s ∼59% -35%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
41342 MB/s ∼54% -41%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Multimedia
  (228 - 1193, n=85, last 2 years)
524 MB/s ∼100% +39%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
478 MB/s ∼91% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
419 MB/s ∼80% +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
411 MB/s ∼78% +9%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
392 MB/s ∼75% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (289 - 422, n=9)
385 MB/s ∼73% +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
378 MB/s ∼72%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia
  (1501 - 8371, n=79, last 2 years)
4750 KRay/s ∼100% +24%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
4554 KRay/s ∼96% +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4483 KRay/s ∼94% +17%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
4183 KRay/s ∼88% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (2756 - 4551, n=9)
4007 KRay/s ∼84% +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
3919 KRay/s ∼83% +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3819 KRay/s ∼80%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40069 MPixel/s ∼100% +74%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (21992 - 40069, n=9)
29606 MPixel/s ∼74% +29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8034 - 45694, n=79, last 2 years)
24563 MPixel/s ∼61% +7%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
23024 MPixel/s ∼57%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
22901 MPixel/s ∼57% -1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
21625 MPixel/s ∼54% -6%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
20549 MPixel/s ∼51% -11%

系统性能

总的来说,PCMark 10得分比我们观察到的宏碁Swift 3和联想IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro低6%左右。 总的来说,我们在日常生产力任务中没有面临任何问题或滞后,包括文字处理、电子表格、轻度图像编辑和网络浏览。

Core i5-1135G7- poweredHP Envy 14 在测试的生产力和数字内容创作部分,似乎比Mi NoteBook Pro有优势,可能是由于专用GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU的一些帮助。

PCMark 10 / Score
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5625 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3580 - 8083, n=85, last 2 years)
5471 Points ∼97% +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5459 Points ∼97% +5%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5410 Points ∼96% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5199 - 5459, n=6)
5356 Points ∼95% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5328 Points ∼95% +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, YMTC PC005 Active 512GB
5199 Points ∼92%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
4886 Points ∼87% -6%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
4809 Points ∼85% -8%
realme Book (Slim)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
4390 Points ∼78% -16%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (9996 - 10650, n=6)
10375 Points ∼100% +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
10241 Points ∼99% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
10191 Points ∼98% +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, YMTC PC005 Active 512GB
9996 Points ∼96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7715 - 11699, n=85, last 2 years)
9569 Points ∼92% -4%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9244 Points ∼89% -8%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
9242 Points ∼89% -8%
realme Book (Slim)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
9090 Points ∼88% -9%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
9036 Points ∼87% -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
8568 Points ∼83% -14%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
9662 Points ∼100% +39%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
8342 Points ∼86% +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5462 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)
7788 Points ∼81% +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
7388 Points ∼76% +6%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
7273 Points ∼75% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (6911 - 7388, n=6)
7057 Points ∼73% +1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, YMTC PC005 Active 512GB
6960 Points ∼72%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6911 Points ∼72% -1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
6622 Points ∼69% -5%
realme Book (Slim)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
6488 Points ∼67% -7%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (2679 - 11777, n=85, last 2 years)
6098 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5880 Points ∼96% +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5838 Points ∼96% +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5828 Points ∼96% +6%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5701 Points ∼93% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5483 - 5838, n=6)
5699 Points ∼93% +4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, YMTC PC005 Active 512GB
5483 Points ∼90%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
4934 Points ∼81% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
4709 Points ∼77% -14%
realme Book (Slim)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
3895 Points ∼64% -29%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5025 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2996 points
PCMark 10 Score
5199 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64524 MB/s ∼100% +69%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (38100 - 64524, n=5)
50883 MB/s ∼79% +34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20513 - 69828, n=79, last 2 years)
42013 MB/s ∼65% +10%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
39127 MB/s ∼61% +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
38100 MB/s ∼59%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
36660 MB/s ∼57% -4%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
34705 MB/s ∼54% -9%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62417 MB/s ∼100% +52%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (40993 - 62417, n=5)
51755 MB/s ∼83% +26%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
47024 MB/s ∼75% +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22183 - 70337, n=78, last 2 years)
45603 MB/s ∼73% +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
43278 MB/s ∼69% +6%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40993 MB/s ∼66%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
40404 MB/s ∼65% -1%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65610 MB/s ∼100% +63%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (40211 - 65610, n=5)
52007 MB/s ∼79% +29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21133 - 66799, n=78, last 2 years)
44391 MB/s ∼68% +10%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
41223 MB/s ∼63% +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
40394 MB/s ∼62% 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40211 MB/s ∼61%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
34029 MB/s ∼52% -15%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7
119 ns * ∼100% -39%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
99.9 ns * ∼84% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
89.1 ns * ∼75% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (83.1 - 91.3, n=5)
87.7 ns * ∼74% -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
87.3 ns * ∼73% -2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
85.5 ns * ∼72%
Average of class Multimedia
  (76.2 - 119, n=85, last 2 years)
76.6 ns * ∼64% +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在采用该处理器的竞争性笔记本电脑中,Mi NoteBook Pro显示出迄今为止最高的DPC延迟。我们观察到,一旦打开默认的网络浏览器,中断到处理的延迟就会飙升。在播放我们测试的YouTube 4K视频后添加Prime95,该值增加到5487.3微秒。

我们注意到,Windows驱动模式框架Wdf01000.sys是造成这种延迟增加的主要原因。Wdf01000.sys本身并不导致高延迟,而是受到其他不稳定的驱动程序的影响,例如本案例中的ACPI.sys。

我们没有特别注意到高分辨率视频播放中的任何问题,尽管用户在处理实时音频和视频编辑工作流程时可能会遇到阻碍。

请看我们的 DPC延时排名页面,了解更多的评测设备的延迟比较。

小米NoteBook Pro受到DPC高延迟的影响
小米NoteBook Pro受到DPC高延迟的影响
仅次于YouTube和Prime95的最高中断到处理延时
仅次于YouTube和Prime95的最高中断到处理延时
Windows内核模式驱动框架似乎有最高的执行时间
Windows内核模式驱动框架似乎有最高的执行时间
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, YMTC PC005 Active 512GB
5487 μs * ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5117 μs * ∼93% +7%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3239 μs * ∼59% +41%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
2489 μs * ∼45% +55%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1087 μs * ∼20% +80%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
796 μs * ∼15% +85%
realme Book (Slim)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
670 μs * ∼12% +88%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
435.4 μs * ∼8% +92%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

YMTC PC005固态硬盘只是被封在一个薄薄的金属封套中,没有适当的散热垫。
YMTC PC005固态硬盘只是被封在一个薄薄的金属封套中,没有适当的散热垫。

小米NoteBook Pro是我们测试的第一台采用YMTC PC005 Active NVMe SSD的笔记本电脑,该产品在2020年首次亮相。对于那些不了解情况的人来说,YMTC是中国本土的SSD制造商,拥有自主研发的3D Xtacking NAND。

PC005 Active的性能与西数PC SN730硬盘相当。然而,我们在队列深度为8的DiskSpd读取循环测试中发现了明显的节流问题。

小米在固态硬盘上欺骗了一个适当的散热垫,而只是把硬盘装在一个薄的金属外壳里。因此,尽管不能完全排除YMTC控制器本身的问题,但所看到的显著节流可能是由于固态硬盘上的散热不良造成的。

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
YMTC PC005 Active 512GB
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
HP 14s-fq1357ng
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
realme Book (Slim)
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
Average YMTC PC005 Active 512GB
 
AS SSD
0%
-5%
-164%
-10%
-38%
-20%
-29%
0%
Seq Read
2633
2775
5%
2015
-23%
1972
-25%
2127
-19%
1960
-26%
1784
-32%
2349
-11%
2633
0%
Seq Write
1390
1436
3%
1055
-24%
981
-29%
1427
3%
1547
11%
742
-47%
826
-41%
1390
0%
4K Read
44.62
49.34
11%
73.9
66%
55.8
25%
52.5
18%
31.56
-29%
58.3
31%
54.7
23%
44.6
0%
4K Write
132.3
198.3
50%
223.2
69%
133.5
1%
122.9
-7%
116.6
-12%
141.9
7%
162.1
23%
132.3
0%
4K-64 Read
966
1270
31%
589
-39%
1277
32%
947
-2%
454.7
-53%
582
-40%
788
-18%
966
0%
4K-64 Write
1194
846
-29%
1029
-14%
313.9
-74%
1598
34%
262.1
-78%
1047
-12%
832
-30%
1194
0%
Access Time Read *
0.043
0.046
-7%
0.056
-30%
0.15
-249%
0.072
-67%
0.052
-21%
0.125
-191%
0.043
-0%
Access Time Write *
0.025
0.054
-116%
0.039
-56%
0.513
-1952%
0.09
-260%
0.034
-36%
0.046
-84%
0.023
8%
0.025
-0%
Score Read
1274
1597
25%
865
-32%
1530
20%
1212
-5%
682
-46%
819
-36%
1078
-15%
1274
0%
Score Write
1465
1188
-19%
1358
-7%
546
-63%
1864
27%
533
-64%
1263
-14%
1077
-26%
1465
0%
Score Total
3337
3541
6%
2644
-21%
2819
-16%
3674
10%
1552
-53%
2469
-26%
2645
-21%
3337
0%
Copy ISO MB/s
2296
1768
-23%
1186
-48%
1105
-52%
1605
-30%
974
-58%
1067
-54%
1034
-55%
2296
0%
Copy Program MB/s
422
532
26%
782
85%
799
89%
847
101%
356.5
-16%
597
41%
349.4
-17%
422
0%
Copy Game MB/s
998
1413
42%
1028
3%
957
-4%
1632
64%
621
-38%
1019
2%
698
-30%
998
0%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
1%
-11%
-18%
-11%
-28%
-33%
-16%
0%
Write 4K
159
136.4
-14%
171.8
8%
136
-14%
119.7
-25%
98.8
-38%
94.8
-40%
147.1
-7%
159
0%
Read 4K
52.5
45.68
-13%
79.4
51%
60.4
15%
45.28
-14%
32.44
-38%
48.93
-7%
56
7%
52.5
0%
Write Seq
1718
2151
25%
1099
-36%
1447
-16%
1951
14%
1582
-8%
1059
-38%
1175
-32%
1718
0%
Read Seq
2586
2062
-20%
1847
-29%
1507
-42%
2252
-13%
1471
-43%
1620
-37%
1810
-30%
2586
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
477.6
515
8%
539
13%
235.6
-51%
438.1
-8%
375.4
-21%
400
-16%
447.3
-6%
478
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
539
537
0%
555
3%
737
37%
312.8
-42%
491.9
-9%
377.2
-30%
493.9
-8%
539
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
2483
3093
25%
1095
-56%
1529
-38%
2348
-5%
1574
-37%
1136
-54%
1234
-50%
2483
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3446
3386
-2%
1988
-42%
2357
-32%
3529
2%
2329
-32%
2073
-40%
3102
-10%
3446
0%
Write 4K Q8T8
490.8
496.1
1%
491
0%
Read 4K Q8T8
1133
902
-20%
1133
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / 1%
-8% / -7%
-91% / -111%
-11% / -10%
-33% / -34%
-27% / -25%
-23% / -23%
0% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

YMTC PC005 Active 512GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3446 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2483 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 539 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 477.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2586 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1718 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 159 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 490.8 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1133 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

1545.51710.51875.52040.52205.52370.52535.52700.52865.53030.53195.5Tooltip
: Ø2319 (1545.45-3219.19)

GPU性能

与RedmiBook Pro 15不同,Mi NoteBook Pro没有独立的GPU,所以它必须依靠集成的Iris Xe Graphics G7。iGPU的性能并不真正令人信服。我们看到宏碁Swift 3和联想IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro采用相同的芯片,在3DMark测试中的得分要高得多。

在强度较低的测试中,如3DMarkCloud Gate 和Ice Storm Extreme,Acer Swift 3采用的是AMD Ryzen 7 4700URadeon RX Vega 7图形处理器,成功地取得了对小米NoteBook Pro的适当领先。

在电池运行时,只观察到3DMarkTime Spy 分数略微下降了2%。

3DMarkTime Spy 显示在电池上的分数有大约2%的打击。
3DMarkTime Spy 显示在电池上的分数有大约2%的打击。
 
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (1365 - 33856, n=88, last 2 years)
11574 Points ∼100% +83%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7
11055 Points ∼96% +75%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H
7983 Points ∼69% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
7115 Points ∼61% +13%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
6904 Points ∼60% +9%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2867 - 7134, n=112)
6335 Points ∼55% 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
6311 Points ∼55%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U
5731 Points ∼50% -9%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
4990 Points ∼43% -21%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4
3902 Points ∼34% -38%
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7
10250 Points ∼100% +123%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1245 - 23208, n=88, last 2 years)
8622 Points ∼84% +88%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
6955 Points ∼68% +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
6786 Points ∼66% +48%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H
5836 Points ∼57% +27%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1926 - 7160, n=111)
5310 Points ∼52% +16%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
4593 Points ∼45%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U
4514 Points ∼44% -2%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4
4354 Points ∼42% -5%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
3663 Points ∼36% -20%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7
51846 Points ∼100% +138%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6498 - 141196, n=72, last 2 years)
40995 Points ∼79% +88%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
33402 Points ∼64% +53%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
29175 Points ∼56% +34%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (13162 - 38040, n=103)
26105 Points ∼50% +20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H
25467 Points ∼49% +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
22895 Points ∼44% +5%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
21823 Points ∼42%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4
19209 Points ∼37% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 26718, n=93, last 2 years)
8391 Points ∼100% +110%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7
8131 Points ∼97% +103%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
5771 Points ∼69% +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
5652 Points ∼67% +41%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2286 - 5955, n=122)
4811 Points ∼57% +20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H
4435 Points ∼53% +11%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
3999 Points ∼48%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U
3383 Points ∼40% -15%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
3134 Points ∼37% -22%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4
3114 Points ∼37% -22%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
80922 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (45789 - 88727, n=10)
63611 Points ∼79% +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (29368 - 98088, n=13, last 2 years)
58310 Points ∼72% +15%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4
54963 Points ∼68% +9%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
50593 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H
29372 Points ∼36% -42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H
29368 Points ∼36% -42%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (301 - 10063, n=87, last 2 years)
3098 Points ∼100% +130%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7
2982 Points ∼96% +121%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
1717 Points ∼55% +27%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
1709 Points ∼55% +27%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (707 - 1830, n=120)
1459 Points ∼47% +8%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H
1349 Points ∼44%
HP 14s-fq1357ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U
1064 Points ∼34% -21%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
973 Points ∼31% -28%
realme Book (Slim)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4
913 Points ∼29% -32%
3DMark 11 Performance
6498 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
64072 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
16724 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3656 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
1707 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1502 points
Help

游戏性能

我们在游戏基准测试中也看到性能下降。小米NoteBook Pro落后于具有类似规格的竞争对手,即使是在不太费力的游戏中,如Dota 2。RebornStrange Brigade。在所有的X-Plane 11测试中,该设备的帧数一直最少。