Notebookcheck Logo

华硕Zenbook Pro 14 Duo在审查。具有快速120赫兹OLED显示屏的双屏笔记本电脑

两个屏幕和一个快速的CPU。 华硕通过新的Zenbook Pro 14 Duo保留了双屏概念,该产品采用了快速的120赫兹OLED显示屏和英特尔的新Alder Lake H处理器。可选的是,也有配备专用GeForce RTX显卡的机型,但我们的测试设备只配备了集成GPU。
Alder Lake Laptop / Notebook Intel Thunderbolt Windows

通过新的Zenbook Pro 14 Duo,华硕推出了一款具有两个屏幕的强大多媒体笔记本电脑。我们已经熟悉了老款的基本概念。 禅书双核14 UX482,但新的Pro 14 Duo具有一些重要的变化,总的来说,用户可以特别期待更多的性能。虽然前代产品仍然配备了英特尔Tiger Lake U处理器,但华硕现在使用的是新的Alder Lake一代更快的H45 CPU。一个专门的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti也可选择使用。主显示屏是一个14.5英寸的4K OLED屏幕,第二个屏幕使用IPS面板;它们都以120赫兹的速度运行。

我们的评测单元采用UX8402Z型号,使用酷睿i7-12700H,结合16GB LPDDR5内存和512GB PCIe 4.0固态硬盘。然而,我们的设备必须没有专用的GeForce GPU;图形计算完全由处理器的集成式 Iris Xe Graphics G7.我们的配置价格约为1,899欧元(约合2,033美元),而配备RTX 3050 Ti和1TB SSD的型号价格为2,299欧元(约合2,462美元)。

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1400 MHz, Memory: 2400 MHz
Memory
16384 MB 
, LPDDR5, dual-channel, onboard
Display
14.50 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 234 PPI, capacitive, ATNA45AF01-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB 
, 430 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.6 x 323.5 x 224.7
Battery
76 Wh, 4770 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 150-watt PSU, MyAsus, ProArt Creator Hub, ScreenXpert, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.736 kg, Power Supply: 420 g
Price
1,900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.4 %
06/2022
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg19.6 mm14.50"2880x1800
89 %
03/2022
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.8 kg19 mm14.40"2400x1600
92.7 %
11/2021
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964
90.6 %
05/2022
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg15.25 mm14.00"3840x2400
85.1 %
02/2021
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.6 kg16.9 mm14.00"1920x1080

外壳 - 带有新铰链机制的Zenbook

相较于 笔记本双核14,华硕已经完全重新设计了外壳和提升第二块屏幕的铰链机制。这是一个全金属外壳,采用科技黑颜色的变体,整个外壳设计整体上相当谨慎。显示屏盖上有微妙的华硕新标志,同心圆图案仍然存在,但你必须仔细观察才能注意到它。根据华硕的说法,还有一个防污涂层,但你还是应该不时地擦拭盖子。

新的铰链机制给人留下了整体稳定的印象。只要你打开盖子,副显示屏也会升起。虽然这两根支撑杆看起来相当脆弱,但它们的工作做得相当好。主显示屏本身是通过两个铰链连接到ScreenPad上的,而不是直接连接到底座上的。这有助于华硕确保两个屏幕之间始终有一个干净的过渡,但铰链的稳定性并不令人满意,因为当你改变打开角度(最大约145-150度)时,主屏幕会明显晃动。不过,屏幕盖子本身非常稳定,即使是局部的压力也不会导致图像失真。这也适用于基本单元,而且键盘在打字时也不会弯曲。

说到占地面积,我们的对比设备几乎没有差别,但额外的屏幕也影响到建筑高度和重量。然而,这里也没有大的差别。在运输设备时,你仍然要考虑到420克的电源适配器。

尺寸比较

323.5 mm 224.7 mm 19.6 mm 1.7 kg323 mm 228 mm 19 mm 1.8 kg324 mm 222 mm 16.9 mm 1.6 kg318 mm 230 mm 15.25 mm 1.4 kg312.6 mm 221.2 mm 15.5 mm 1.6 kg

连接性 - 带有Thunderbolt和USB-A的Zenbook

Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的端口分布在两边以及背面。USB端口都位于右侧,也相当在中间,这在每种情况下都不是很理想。专用电源接口、微型SD读卡器和HDMI输出都在背面。由于特殊的机制,在打开设备时,屏幕也被抬高了一些,所以背面的端口总是可以使用。

iGPU版本最多允许连接三个外部显示器,但只有在Zenbook的第二个屏幕被禁用的情况下。使用两个内置屏幕将外部显示器的数量限制为两个。

右边:2个雷电4(USB-C 4.0,DisplayPort ALT模式1.4a,Power Delivery),USB-A 3.2 Gen.
右边:2个雷电4(USB-C 4.0,DisplayPort ALT模式1.4a,Power Delivery),USB-A 3.2 Gen.
左边:3.5毫米立体声音频插孔
左边:3.5毫米立体声音频插孔
背面:HDMI 2.1,微型SD读卡器,电源
背面:HDMI 2.1,微型SD读卡器,电源

SD卡阅读器

背面的microSD读卡器使用了一个弹簧机制,能够完全容纳存储卡。使用我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60),我们确定平均传输速率约为80 MB/s,与旧型号相比,这是一个实质性的增长。 旧型号.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core (AV PRO V60)
122 MB/s ∼100% +55%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 226, n=58, last 2 years)
83.7 MB/s ∼69% +6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.6 MB/s ∼64%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)
24.94 MB/s ∼20% -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.2 - 217, n=56, last 2 years)
90 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
81.9 MB/s ∼91%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)
27.2 MB/s ∼30% -67%

沟通

用户将不得不没有以太网模块(但可以通过TB4适配器实现),但作为回报,英特尔内置的AX211E是最现代的WLAN模块之一。我们能够连接到华硕的参考路由器(GT-AXE11000)提供的6GHz网络(Wi-Fi 6E),没有任何问题,超过1.6GHz的传输速率非常高,也非常稳定。与更常见的Wi-Fi 6和Wi-Fi 5网络的连接也没有出现任何不正常情况。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1446 (662min - 1538max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1003 - 1501, n=4)
1320 MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Multimedia
  (277 - 1497, n=74, last 2 years)
1050 MBit/s ∼73%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1030 (684min - 1188max) MBit/s ∼71%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
689 (349min - 730max) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1449 (1384min - 1511max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1178 - 1623, n=4)
1409 MBit/s ∼97%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1293 (1024min - 1492max) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Multimedia
  (137 - 1684, n=74, last 2 years)
1148 MBit/s ∼79%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
730 (645min - 824max) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1665 (1628min - 1691max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
1665 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1409 - 1857, n=11)
1614 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1467 (1440min - 1493max) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1613 (1478min - 1688max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1601 (1502min - 1664max) MBit/s ∼99%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
1601 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1283 - 1851, n=11)
1519 MBit/s ∼94% -5%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1601 (1502-1664)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1628-1691)
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1448 (1384-1511)
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1030 (684-1188)

网络摄像头

华硕仍然在屏幕的上边框使用了一个720p的网络摄像头。该摄像头完成了它的工作,但照片不是特别清晰,这里的东西当然可以做得更好。

ColorChecker
16.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA: 15.96 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 27.13 ∆E

维护

底部机箱盖用几颗Torx螺丝(T5)固定,可以拆卸。然而,维护工作仅限于清洁风扇和M.2 2280固态硬盘,后者可以被替换。

内部视图
内部视图

输入设备 - 无掌托的Zenbook

键盘

由于增加了显示屏,键盘被完全移到了前面,这就是为什么根本没有掌托。如果你有足够的空间(例如在办公桌上),这可以发挥作用,但如果不是这样的话,很快就会变得不舒服。此外,右侧的按键有点拥挤(只有一个单行回车键),特别是方向键非常小。这是一个遗憾,因为键盘本身提供了非常舒适的打字体验,加上其1.4毫米的键程,绝对适合长时间打字。白色背光可以分三档调节,还可以通过环境光传感器自动激活/关闭,效果很好,非常实用。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光灯
键盘背光灯

触摸板和触摸屏

触摸板已经移到了键盘的右边,在纵向模式下需要做一些妥协。滑动性能非常好,我们所有的输入都能顺利实现。然而,小的表面(5.3 x 7.8厘米)经常迫使你重新定位你的手指,即使是简单的指针移动。此外,仅由于空间有限,涉及两个以上手指的手势就非常困难。两个专用的鼠标按钮位于触摸板的下方(没有ClickPad),其行程相对较长,不会发出如此响亮的点击声。

当然,两个电容式触摸屏也可用于输入,我们在此没有任何批评,因为它们工作得非常好。据华硕称,还支持手写笔输入,但我们的评测样品没有配备。

显示屏 - Zenbook采用120赫兹OLED显示屏

Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED亚像素网格
Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED亚像素网格

首先,我们来看看主显示屏,华硕选择了一块14.5英寸的2.8K OLED面板。16:10的面板上分布着2880x1,800像素(234DPI),主观的图像质量非常好。图像和内容看起来非常生动和详细,运动中的图像印象也得益于高刷新率(120赫兹),不过你首先要手动激活。

华硕规定亮度最高为550cd/m²(也可以通过传感器自动调整),但你必须在这里区分SDR和HDR内容。在正常使用中,最大亮度 "只有 "360 cd/m²左右。这听起来并不多,但OLED面板的极高对比度在一定程度上弥补了这一点。只要你在设置中启用HDR并观看正确的内容,你还可以享受高达580 cd/m²的亮度值,我们能够在一个小的白色屏幕部分进行测量。在几乎完全白色的图像中,大约460cd/m²的亮度仍然是可能的。这些比率与目前笔记本电脑中的大多数OLED面板相当。然而,经常使用HDR内容的用户应该看一下 MacBook Pro 14它有一个迷你LED面板,可以自动检测HDR内容,并因此实现了超过1500cd/m²的亮度值。与Apple ,Zenbook的色温也可以通过传感器根据环境光线自动调整。在OLED显示器中没有屏幕出血现象。

359
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA45AF01-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 359 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 357.2 cd/m² Minimum: 0.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 356 cd/m²
Contrast: 17800:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 2
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
97.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
ATNA45AF01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.40
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 14.00
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
-13%
-1%
0%
-20%
Display P3 Coverage
99.9
80.6
-19%
99.3
-1%
98.7
-1%
69
-31%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
99.8
0%
99.1
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97.4
78.5
-19%
98.5
1%
71
-27%
Response Times
-417%
728%
-11%
-2034%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
58.4 ?(26.8, 31.6)
-2333%
58.4 ?(27.6, 30.8)
-2333%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
-17%
56.4 ?(30, 26.4)
-2250%
Response Time Black / White *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
24 ?(8.4, 15.6)
-900%
40.4 ?(20.8, 19.6)
-1583%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
-17%
46 ?(24.4, 21.6)
-1817%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(100)
5000 ?(98)
1983%
14880
6100%
239.2 ?(50)
0%
Screen
-134%
60%
250%
-139%
Brightness middle
356
497
40%
489
37%
361
1%
361.8
2%
Brightness
357
491
38%
479
34%
362
1%
351
-2%
Brightness Distribution
99
92
-7%
94
-5%
98
-1%
90
-9%
Black Level *
0.02
0.29
-1350%
0.01
50%
0.001
95%
0.28
-1300%
Contrast
17800
1714
-90%
48900
175%
361000
1928%
1292
-93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
1.2
54%
0.8
69%
2.8
-8%
1.44
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.5
2.8
38%
1.3
71%
5.8
-29%
3.3
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2
0.8
60%
1.24
38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.9
14%
1.1
50%
1.9
14%
1.3
41%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.14 103%
2.24 98%
2.16 102%
2.15 102%
CCT
6246 104%
6821 95%
6181 105%
6411 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
64.9
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.3
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-188% / -166%
262% / 222%
80% / 141%
-731% / -384%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
CalMAN灰度(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
卡尔曼饱和度(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
卡尔曼饱和度(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
CalMAN ColorChecker(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN灰阶校准(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN灰阶校准(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN饱和度校准(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN饱和度校准(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)。

我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)分析了该面板,并在MyAsus应用程序中使用了Native预设(也对应于Display P3配置文件),但你也可以选择切换到sRGB。开箱后,性能已经非常好,只有少数孤立的颜色超过了重要的DeltaE 2000偏差3(与DCI-P3参考相比)。通过我们自己的校准(配置文件可在上面免费下载),我们可以进一步提高再现的质量。只有在100%的红色下,才会有略微升高的偏差。尽管如此,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo还是适用于图像编辑,P3色彩空间也被完全覆盖。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21833 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们必须更详细地讨论一下OLED显示器中的PWM主题。原则上,我们可以确定在所有亮度值中都有240赫兹的闪烁。然而,所谓的直流调光是在100%-60%的亮度范围内使用的,这对眼睛的问题要小得多。只要亮度降到60%以下,华硕就建议用户在眼睛疲劳的情况下休息一下。然而,制造商还在MyAsus应用程序中提供了另一种选择,制造商称之为 "无闪烁OLED调光"。OLED的调光水平可以在那里逐步调整(不过功耗保持不变),而且仍然使用直流调光。这很有意义,对于那些对OLED闪烁特别敏感的用户来说,这是一个不错的选择。

100%的亮度
100%的亮度
80%的亮度
80%的亮度
60%的亮度
60%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
40%的亮度
40%的亮度
20%的亮度
20%的亮度
0%的亮度
0%的亮度

自然,光泽的OLED触摸屏在户外使用时有反射的问题。然而,高对比度仍然有帮助,只要你能避免直接的光源/反射,你应该仍然能够正常看到屏幕内容。OLED显示屏的视角稳定性也没有受到影响,但从某些角度看,你会得到熟悉的轻微蓝色色调。

在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

ScreenPad Plus - 在120赫兹下运行的哑光IPS面板

子像素网格的图片显示了极富颗粒感的显示效果。
子像素网格的图片显示了极富颗粒感的显示效果。

现在我们来看看键盘上方的附加显示屏。这是一个无光泽的IPS触摸屏,分辨率为2880x864像素。不过,从主观上看,图像质量极差,让人想起10年前的哑光触摸屏。我们已经很久没有看到这样的颗粒状显示屏了(另见亚像素图片)。除了一些缩放问题(窗口大小总是改变),使用第二个显示器(有一个拖动窗口的按钮,但你也可以简单地用鼠标拖动窗口到第二个显示器上)效果相当好,我们可以看到第二个显示器如何根据工作流程真正有意义,但由于颗粒状的图像印象,使用起来并不完全令人愉快。

这是一个耻辱,因为它实际上是一个相当好的显示器,没有PWM,有快速的响应时间(也是120赫兹),甚至在我们的CalMAN分析中也有不错的表现。第二台显示器的最大亮度为600cd/m²,在HDR模式下甚至比OLED显示器更亮一些。

585
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 605 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 566 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 605 cd/m²
Contrast: 1315:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
Gamma: 2.2
ScreenPad CalMAN灰阶(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
ScreenPad CalMAN灰阶(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
ScreenPad CalMAN饱和度(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
ScreenPad CalMAN饱和度(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
ScreenPad CalMAN ColorChecker(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
ScreenPad CalMAN ColorChecker(DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
与DCI-P3(CalMAN 2D交叉点)相比
与DCI-P3(CalMAN 2D交叉点)相比

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21833 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

性能 - 华硕选择了英特尔的45瓦CPU

 
 

测试条件

在MyAsus应用程序中,有三种不同的电源设置。低声模式、标准和性能,其中性能仅在插入时可用。这些模式既影响性能,也影响风扇音量。我们在下面的表格中列出了三种模式对应的TDP值。

MyAsus模式 PL2 PL1 最大风扇音量
低音模式 60瓦 35瓦 29.2 dB(A)
标准模式 80 瓦 60 -> 55 瓦 41.7 dB(A)
性能模式 80 瓦 70 -> 62 瓦 48.8 dB(A)

性能模式只影响CPU的多核性能。然而,与标准模式相比,优势不是很大,而且风扇的声音明显变大,这就是为什么我们也主要使用标准预设(华硕推荐的能源配置文件,Windows性能模式:最佳性能)进行测量和基准测试。这种行为在有专用RTX 3050 Ti的配置中可能有所不同。

处理器 - 酷睿i7-12700H

ǞǞǞ 英特尔酷睿i7-12700H是最新的Alder Lake H45代的一部分,它基于6个快速性能核心(最高4.7 GHz)和8个效率核心(最高3.5 GHz)的混合架构。从技术上讲,这是一个45瓦的处理器,但我们在其他测试中看到,酷睿i7在负载下可以消耗超过120瓦的功率。在80/60瓦的功率限制下,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo仍处于良好状态,它取得了持续良好的基准测试结果。特别是与旧的禅宗14双核与它的 ULV处理器,性能得到了显著提高。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

012024036048060072084096010801200132014401560168018001920204021602280Tooltip
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2250 (2201.55-2389.34)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø2111 (2031.08-2355.57)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø947 (936.68-1007.91)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core; Rosetta 2: Ø1311 (1303.74-1319.74)
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1634 (1600.9-1805.05)
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø907 (901.51-936.79)

我们注意到在标准模式下的Cinebench循环中有一个有趣的(可重复的)行为,在第一次运行后,性能会短暂下降一点,直到风扇启动。在性能模式下,多核性能高出约7%,但风扇的声音也明显变大。

该处理器在电池供电时最大可消耗46瓦特。这对单核性能没有影响,但多核性能约降低23%。其他CPU基准测试可在 这里.

Cinebench R15多循环(绿色:标准,红色:性能)。
Cinebench R15多循环(绿色:标准,红色:性能)。
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
88.5 pt ∼89%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
87.8 pt ∼88%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -8!
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
76.1 pt ∼76%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
74.9 pt ∼75%
Average of class Multimedia
 
57.4 pt ∼57%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
55 pt ∼55%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA -2!
Intel Core i7-1165G7
41.3 pt ∼41%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19250, n=29)
16285 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
15101 Points ∼93%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
10735 Points ∼66% -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9581 Points ∼59% -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3121 - 18444, n=87, last 2 years)
8145 Points ∼50% -46%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
6495 Points ∼40% -57%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5827 (1104.73min - 5827.22max) Points ∼36% -61%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
1807 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1793 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1825, n=28)
1746 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1531 Points ∼85% -15%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1497 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (819 - 1940, n=81, last 2 years)
1392 Points ∼77% -23%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1345 Points ∼74% -26%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7382, n=28)
6079 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
5797 Points ∼95%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
4048 Points ∼67% -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (961 - 7040, n=98, last 2 years)
2928 Points ∼48% -49%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
2526 Points ∼42% -56%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2264 Points ∼37% -61%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 702, n=28)
672 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
657 Points ∼94% -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
578 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
571 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (316 - 739, n=98, last 2 years)
521 Points ∼75% -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2903, n=30)
2561 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
2389.34 (2201.55min - 2389.24max) Points ∼93%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
2355.57 (2031.08min - 2355.57max) Points ∼92% -1%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1805 (1600.9min - 1805.05max) Points ∼70% -24%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1320 (1307min - 1320max) Points ∼52% -45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (385 - 2894, n=111, last 2 years)
1319 Points ∼52% -45%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1008 (936.68min - 1007.91max) Points ∼39% -58%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
937 (901.51min - 936.79max) Points ∼37% -61%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
259 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=28)
252 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
243 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
226.7 Points ∼88% -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
223 Points ∼86% -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
210 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 279, n=94, last 2 years)
206 Points ∼80% -20%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
521 Seconds * ∼100% -135%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
491 Seconds * ∼94% -121%
Average of class Multimedia
  (183.3 - 1188, n=96, last 2 years)
462 Seconds * ∼89% -108%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
300 Seconds * ∼58% -35%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (171 - 732, n=27)
227 Seconds * ∼44% -2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
222 Seconds * ∼43%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=27)
62024 MIPS ∼100% +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
61571 MIPS ∼99%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
45227 MIPS ∼73% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11122 - 72912, n=95, last 2 years)
34122 MIPS ∼55% -45%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
26809 MIPS ∼43% -56%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
25923 MIPS ∼42% -58%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
5673 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5863, n=27)
5564 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5214 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
5204 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
5104 MIPS ∼90% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2898 - 6186, n=95, last 2 years)
5052 MIPS ∼89% -11%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
12345 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=28)
11908 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
10321 Points ∼84% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9942 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2427 - 14376, n=96, last 2 years)
6674 Points ∼54% -46%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
5701 Points ∼46% -54%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
1771 Points ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1769 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1764 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=28)
1725 Points ∼97% -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1551 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (843 - 1887, n=96, last 2 years)
1422 Points ∼80% -20%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.4, n=29)
17.2 fps ∼100% +13%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
15.2 fps ∼88%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
12.4 fps ∼72% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 21, n=95, last 2 years)
9.19 fps ∼53% -40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
7.93 fps ∼46% -48%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1.39 fps ∼8% -91%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
88.1 s * ∼100% -95%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
54.6 s * ∼62% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30.2 - 99.2, n=93, last 2 years)
53.1 s * ∼60% -18%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
47.9 s * ∼54% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 92, n=27)
45.6 s * ∼52% -1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
45.1 s * ∼51%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1.002 sec * ∼100% -119%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4155 - 1.002, n=96, last 2 years)
0.599 sec * ∼60% -31%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.596 sec * ∼59% -30%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
0.4993 sec * ∼50% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.448 - 1.052, n=27)
0.48 sec * ∼48% -5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4583 sec * ∼46%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2389.34 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
125.3 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
259 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
94.7 pt ∼95%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
86.9 pt ∼87%
Average of class Multimedia
 
81.6 pt ∼82%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
66.1 pt ∼66%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52.8 pt ∼53%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia
  (2677 - 15700, n=70, last 2 years)
8686 KRay/s ∼100% +23%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 9576, n=27)
8112 KRay/s ∼93% +15%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7269 KRay/s ∼84% +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7071 KRay/s ∼81%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5393 KRay/s ∼62% -24%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Multimedia
  (12762 - 98165, n=70, last 2 years)
44522 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 41744, n=27)
37245 Points ∼84% +7%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
34831 Points ∼78%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
31471 Points ∼71% -10%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
21811 Points ∼49% -37%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 3442, n=27)
2872 MB/s ∼100% +14%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2529 MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Multimedia
  (841 - 4254, n=70, last 2 years)
2203 MB/s ∼77% -13%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2076 MB/s ∼72% -18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2059 MB/s ∼72% -19%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
99205 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 99917, n=27)
96776 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31314 - 107161, n=70, last 2 years)
69353 Points ∼70% -30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47895 Points ∼48% -52%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42571 Points ∼43% -57%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9928, n=27)
9162 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8690 Points ∼95%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3124 - 12542, n=70, last 2 years)
7338 Points ∼80% -16%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5524 Points ∼60% -36%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4567 Points ∼50% -47%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Multimedia
  (7417 - 54148, n=70, last 2 years)
24543 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 27390, n=27)
22445 Points ∼91% +11%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
20299 Points ∼83%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
18322 Points ∼75% -10%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
11520 Points ∼47% -43%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 102398, n=27)
77634 MB/s ∼100% +48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13739 - 147249, n=70, last 2 years)
62277 MB/s ∼80% +18%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52590 MB/s ∼68%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44267 MB/s ∼57% -16%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
20435 MB/s ∼26% -61%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=27)
995 MB/s ∼100% +12%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
890 MB/s ∼89%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
660 MB/s ∼66% -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (228 - 1193, n=77, last 2 years)
507 MB/s ∼51% -43%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
325 MB/s ∼33% -63%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia
  (1501 - 8371, n=71, last 2 years)
4736 KRay/s ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 5760, n=27)
4709 KRay/s ∼99% +15%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4108 KRay/s ∼87%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
3897 KRay/s ∼82% -5%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2981 KRay/s ∼63% -27%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
41420 MPixel/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37512 MPixel/s ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (19423 - 46643, n=27)
33723 MPixel/s ∼81% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8034 - 45694, n=71, last 2 years)
24242 MPixel/s ∼59% -41%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
16079 MPixel/s ∼39% -61%

系统性能

尽管缺乏专用的GeForce GPU,但Zenbook Pro 14 Duo在合成生产力基准测试(PCMark、CrossMark)中的表现非常好,这也被我们的主观印象所证实。在日常使用中,Zenbook的响应速度非常快,而且系统处理第二块显示屏也没有问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5948 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
5948 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5738 Points ∼96% -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
5538 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3580 - 8083, n=80, last 2 years)
5429 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
4957 Points ∼83% -17%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10990 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
10990 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10826 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
10299 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7715 - 11019, n=80, last 2 years)
9470 Points ∼86% -14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
8715 Points ∼79% -21%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
8342 Points ∼100% +19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5462 - 11186, n=80, last 2 years)
7799 Points ∼93% +11%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7030 Points ∼84% 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7024 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
7024 Points ∼84% 0%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
6623 Points ∼79% -6%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7401 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
7401 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6739 Points ∼91% -9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
6343 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2679 - 11777, n=80, last 2 years)
6020 Points ∼81% -19%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
4846 Points ∼65% -35%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1799 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
1799 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1685 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (970 - 2138, n=19, last 2 years)
1539 Points ∼86% -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1490 Points ∼83% -17%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1407 Points ∼78% -22%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1693 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
1693 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1604 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (921 - 2038, n=19, last 2 years)
1475 Points ∼87% -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1417 Points ∼84% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1305 Points ∼77% -23%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2016 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
2016 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1915 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1821 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (933 - 2210, n=19, last 2 years)
1691 Points ∼84% -16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1472 Points ∼73% -27%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1547 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1533 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
1533 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1012 - 2234, n=19, last 2 years)
1367 Points ∼88% -11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1202 Points ∼78% -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1044 Points ∼67% -32%
PCMark 10 Score
5948 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
67871 MB/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
59479 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (38501 - 77803, n=27)
56210 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20927 - 67871, n=71, last 2 years)
41119 MB/s ∼61% -39%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
67758 MB/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (42543 - 76185, n=27)
59735 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
57407 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22183 - 67758, n=70, last 2 years)
44875 MB/s ∼66% -34%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
61263 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58160 MB/s ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (42088 - 66475, n=27)
56190 MB/s ∼92% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21133 - 66728, n=70, last 2 years)
43922 MB/s ∼72% -24%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
101 ns * ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (93.2 - 119, n=77, last 2 years)
76.4 ns * ∼76%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0 - 122, n=28)
60.8 ns * ∼60%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
0 ns * ∼0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
0 ns * ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中,使用目前的BIOS版本,Zenbook没有显示出任何重大问题,在播放视频时也没有跳帧(掉帧),但有一个驱动程序引起了一点麻烦(ACPI驱动程序)。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
959.5 μs * ∼100% -116%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
752 μs * ∼78% -69%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
453.1 μs * ∼47% -2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
444.1 μs * ∼46%

* ... smaller is better

储存

华硕安装了一块来自三星的快速PCIe 4.0固态硬盘(PM9A1),存储容量为512GB,其中约430GB在首次启动后可用。该固态硬盘在基准测试中的表现略低于预期,在连续加载时也可以观察到轻微的性能下降。这在日常使用中并无影响,但三星固态硬盘无法发挥其全部潜力。其原因可能是温度问题,因为硬盘被放在离处理器和机箱内的热管很近的地方。更多的固态硬盘基准测试可以在我们的 硬盘/SSD基准测试文章.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6799.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5038.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 438.12 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 412.65 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 77.71 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 157.97 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 429.44 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1000.09 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
96.6 pt ∼97%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
 
77.7 pt ∼78%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
72.6 pt ∼73%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
55.7 pt ∼56%
Average of class Multimedia
 
48 pt ∼48%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
42.5 pt ∼43%
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4012 (3903.22min - 4012.48max) MB/s ∼100% +6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3773 (3715.43min - 3772.78max) MB/s ∼94%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1472 - 4294, n=20)
3421 MB/s ∼85% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (816 - 4480, n=83, last 2 years)
2080 MB/s ∼52% -45%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1994 (1982.65min - 1994.18max) MB/s ∼50% -47%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1930 (1920.36min - 1930.22max) MB/s ∼48% -49%
seq write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4146 (4097.82min - 4146.07max) MB/s ∼100% +30%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1148 - 4196, n=20)
3328 MB/s ∼80% +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3187 (3096.33min - 3186.54max) MB/s ∼77%
Average of class Multimedia
  (240 - 4457, n=83, last 2 years)
2117 MB/s ∼51% -34%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1900 (1869.23min - 1900.47max) MB/s ∼46% -40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1583 (1538.61min - 1582.72max) MB/s ∼38% -50%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6082 (5108.93min - 6082.16max) MB/s ∼100% +80%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (3387 - 6742, n=20)
5860 MB/s ∼96% +73%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
3547 (3020.99min - 3546.88max) MB/s ∼58% +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
3527 (3023.67min - 3526.78max) MB/s ∼58% +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3387 (2163.29min - 3386.84max) MB/s ∼56%
Average of class Multimedia
  (970 - 7028, n=82, last 2 years)
3383 MB/s ∼56% 0%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5061 (5034.21min - 5061.21max) MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4971 (4954.47min - 4971.21max) MB/s ∼98% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1146 - 5061, n=20)
4425 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
3196 MB/s ∼63% -37%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2968 (2813.75min - 2968.31max) MB/s ∼59% -41%
Average of class Multimedia
  (241 - 5089, n=83, last 2 years)
2592 MB/s ∼51% -49%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
86.2 (82.58min - 86.23max) MB/s ∼100% +14%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
75.6 (75.08min - 75.62max) MB/s ∼88%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (37.6 - 92.9, n=20)
71.1 MB/s ∼82% -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
62.4 (61.86min - 62.42max) MB/s ∼72% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (27 - 113, n=83, last 2 years)
52.2 MB/s ∼61% -31%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
44.96 (44.77min - 44.96max) MB/s ∼52% -41%
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
215 (210.55min - 214.96max) MB/s ∼100% +32%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (131 - 241, n=20)
184.5 MB/s ∼86% +13%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
162.8 (160.36min - 162.76max) MB/s ∼76%
Average of class Multimedia
  (64.7 - 373, n=83, last 2 years)
157.9 MB/s ∼73% -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
143 (140.1min - 143.21max) MB/s ∼67% -12%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
108.9 (88.06min - 108.92max) MB/s ∼51% -33%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3345 (3332.76min - 3344.97max) MB/s ∼100% +419%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (633 - 3423, n=20)
2244 MB/s ∼67% +248%
Average of class Multimedia
  (271 - 4178, n=83, last 2 years)
1312 MB/s ∼39% +104%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
794 (786.46min - 793.65max) MB/s ∼24% +23%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
731 (707.58min - 731.27max) MB/s ∼22% +14%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
644 (640.97min - 643.93max) MB/s ∼19%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2382 (1954.07min - 2382.29max) MB/s ∼100% +435%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (291 - 3567, n=20)
1656 MB/s ∼70% +272%
Average of class Multimedia
  (163 - 3612, n=83, last 2 years)
1169 MB/s ∼49% +163%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
445.8 (435.45min - 445.79max) MB/s ∼19% 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
445 (438.68min - 445.02max) MB/s ∼19%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
403 (396.1min - 402.54max) MB/s ∼17% -9%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8167 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (3573 - 8620, n=20)
6366 Points ∼78% +15%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5549 Points ∼68%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
4206 Points ∼51% -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1284 - 9380, n=79, last 2 years)
4026 Points ∼49% -27%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
3446 Points ∼42% -38%
Score Read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3045 Points ∼100% +101%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1214 - 3224, n=20)
2354 Points ∼77% +56%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1513 Points ∼50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (515 - 3634, n=79, last 2 years)
1495 Points ∼49% -1%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1306 Points ∼43% -14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1257 Points ∼41% -17%
Score Write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3626 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3368 Points ∼93%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1567 - 4036, n=20)
2837 Points ∼78% -16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
2343 Points ∼65% -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (283 - 3991, n=79, last 2 years)
1804 Points ∼50% -46%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1497 Points ∼41% -56%
Seq Read
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5216 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5186 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (2629 - 5546, n=20)
4670 MB/s ∼90% -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
2768 MB/s ∼53% -47%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1005 - 5588, n=79, last 2 years)
2681 MB/s ∼51% -49%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2088 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Seq Write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3838 MB/s ∼100% +43%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1270 - 3920, n=20)
2960 MB/s ∼77% +11%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2678 MB/s ∼70%
Average of class Multimedia
  (199.8 - 4218, n=79, last 2 years)
1768 MB/s ∼46% -34%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1683 MB/s ∼44% -37%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1311 MB/s ∼34% -51%
4K Read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.81 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
77.25 MB/s ∼96%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (46.6 - 84.8, n=20)
69.4 MB/s ∼86% -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
63.7 MB/s ∼79% -18%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
58.2 MB/s ∼72% -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (27.3 - 109.4, n=79, last 2 years)
51.8 MB/s ∼64% -33%
4K Write
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
204.37 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
192.81 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
191.1 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (105.4 - 215, n=20)
175.4 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (61 - 322, n=79, last 2 years)
151 MB/s ∼74% -26%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
128.4 MB/s ∼63% -37%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2445.65 MB/s ∼100% +168%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (711 - 2783, n=20)
1817 MB/s ∼74% +99%
Average of class Multimedia
  (290 - 2966, n=79, last 2 years)
1175 MB/s ∼48% +29%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1039 MB/s ∼42% +14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
917 MB/s ∼37% 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
914.1 MB/s ∼37%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3049.61 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2895.76 MB/s ∼95%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1257 - 3480, n=20)
2415 MB/s ∼79% -17%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1983 MB/s ∼65% -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (152.6 - 3342, n=79, last 2 years)
1476 MB/s ∼48% -49%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1238 MB/s ∼41% -57%
Access Time Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.023 - 0.15, n=77, last 2 years)
0.06548 ms * ∼100% -185%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
0.045 ms * ∼69% -96%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (0.023 - 0.078, n=19)
0.04337 ms * ∼66% -89%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
0.024 ms * ∼37% -4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.023 ms * ∼35%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.022 ms * ∼34% +4%
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.012 - 0.679, n=79, last 2 years)
0.08941 ms * ∼100% -347%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
0.088 ms * ∼98% -340%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (0.02 - 0.076, n=20)
0.0331 ms * ∼37% -66%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * ∼23% -5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.02 ms * ∼22%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
0.019 ms * ∼21% +5%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

034068010201360170020402380272030603400374040804420476051005440578061206460Tooltip
: Ø4865 (1568.46-6735.21)

图形卡

GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics G7
GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics G7

正如我们之前提到的,我们对Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的评测配置并没有专门的显卡。相反,处理器的iGPU处理这一任务。与旧的Tiger Lake H45 CPU不同,它们仍然配备了较慢的 UHD Graphics,新的Alder Lake型号配备的是Iris Xe Graphics G7与96个EUs,由于Tiger Lake ULV处理器,我们已经熟悉这项技术有一段时间了。该iGPU非常适用于日常任务和高分辨率视频播放。根据所使用的编解码器,也可以进行视频编辑,但想不时玩游戏的用户肯定应该选择带有 RTX 3050 Ti.有了Iris Xe,你必须专注于要求较低或较老的游戏,但你仍然要经常降低细节水平。即使在长时间的负载和电池供电的情况下,无论是在性能模式还是使用标准预设,性能都很稳定。其他GPU基准测试列在 这里.

华硕表示,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo能够冷却总功率为85瓦,因此我们假设这将是一个40或50瓦的版本的 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti.为了了解使用可选的dGPU时的性能,你可以从 Surface Laptop Studio的提示,它使用50瓦的RTX 3050 Ti版本。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
100 pt ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
 
73.5 pt ∼74%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H