GPD Win Max 2021手持式游戏笔记本电脑评测。Ryzen 7比Core i7更慢

Name: GPD Win Max 2021
Brand: GPD

对于游戏来说，英特尔在关键的地方更快。 Win Max在纸面上听起来很好，其便携的外形对于手持游戏来说很有吸引力，但是有足够的缺点让我们在为这款Windows 10 UMPC投入1000美元时踩下了刹车。

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 08/30/2021 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

Gaming AMD Zen Ryzen (Zen) Console

GPD Win Max去年年底推出了10代英特尔Ice Lake 选项。对于2021年，制造商已经刷新了该模型，采用了更新更快的第11代Tiger Lake CPU，甚至为AMD粉丝提供了Zen 2选项。我们这里的测试单元配备了Ryzen 7 4800U和集成的Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU。虽然AMD后来转向移动的Zen 3 CPU，如 Ryzen 7 5800U但较早的Ryzen 7 4800U仍然是目前最快的U系列CPU之一。

请看Indiegogo的官方网页。了解更多关于Win Max和它的功能。1000美元的价格标签与许多传统超极本处于同一水平，因为Win Max本质上是一台具有现代超极本性能和端口的UMPC。

更多GPD评论。

GPD Win 3

Test device courtesy of GPD

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

GPD Win Max 2021

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U 8 x 1.8 - 4.2 GHz, 22 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained, Renoir-U (Zen 2)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) - 2048 MB VRAM, Memory: 1333 MHz, LPDDR4, 21.6.1

Memory

16 GB

, 1600 MHz, 40-39-45-90, Dual-Channel

Display

8.00 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, Yes, LT7911D, IPS, LTM08E1 controller, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512, 512 GB

Soundcard

AMD Raven/Renoir/Van Gogh/Cezanne/Rembrandt/Raphael - HD Audio Controller

Connections

4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD

Networking

Intel Ethernet Controller I225-V (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 26 x 207 x 145

Battery

57 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

850 g, Power Supply: 156 g

Price

1000 USD

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

potential competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
79.3 %	08/2021	GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8	850 g	26 mm	8.00"	1280x800
		GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	553 g	27 mm	5.50"	1280x720
84.4 %	08/2021	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8	953 g	17 mm	13.30"	1920x1200
84.7 %	08/2021	Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7	1.3 kg	18.2 mm	13.30"	1920x1080
86.3 %		Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	13 mm	13.30"	1920x1080
88.9 %	06/2021	Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	13.9 mm	13.30"	1920x1080

案例

从外观上看，该机箱结构紧凑，灰色金属表面光滑，视觉设计出色。然而，拿在手上，即使是简单的动作，如打开盖子或抓紧底座的两侧，系统也很容易发出吱吱声。由于所有的吱吱作响，该机箱并不带有强烈的豪华感。对于超过一千美元的产品，制造商当然可以在这方面做得更好。

GPD Win Max 2021 GPD Win 3 Chuwi MiniBook CWI526 DIN A5 ❌

连接性

对于这样一个小设计来说，端口选项是丰富的。不幸的是，我们的AMD设备不支持DisplayPort-over-USB-C，这意味着用户必须使用HDMI端口来连接外部显示器。

选择英特尔版本的Win Max将授予两个USB-C端口的Thunderbolt 4兼容性。

沿着左侧边缘的开关可以切换控制器的输入，详情如下这里详述在Win 3上。

后部：HDMI 2.0b，2个USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1，2个USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2

SD卡阅读器

虽然该系统集成了一个MicroSD读卡器，但它在我们的预生产设备上根本无法工作。我们尝试插入UHS-I和UHS-II卡，但都无法识别。我们建议用户在购买时立即测试一下MicroSD卡插槽。

沟通

令人失望的是，Win Max配备的是英特尔7265，而不是更新更快的英特尔AX200/201。这意味着该系统不支持Wi-Fi 6的速度，在将Win Max与Win 3等由英特尔驱动的设备进行比较时就可以看出这一点。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1301 (929^min - 1479^max) MBit/s +219%
GPD Win 3 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1221 (796^min - 1383^max) MBit/s +199%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	940 (858^min - 985^max) MBit/s +130%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	672 (630^min - 730^max) MBit/s +65%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	661 (550^min - 752^max) MBit/s +62%
GPD Win Max 2021 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	408 (334^min - 444^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1542 (1352^min - 1664^max) MBit/s +138%
GPD Win 3 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1427 (1039^min - 1512^max) MBit/s +120%
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1357 (1148^min - 1476^max) MBit/s +109%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	849 (770^min - 905^max) MBit/s +31%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	819 (781^min - 853^max) MBit/s +26%
GPD Win Max 2021 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	649 (528^min - 678^max) MBit/s

GPD Win Max 2021; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø649 (528-678)

GPD Win Max 2021; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø408 (334-444)

维护

底部面板需要一把超小的飞利浦螺丝刀来拆卸。内存和WLAN都是焊接的，这意味着用户只能在需要时升级SSD或更换电池。

配件和保修

除了USB-C交流适配器之外，盒子里没有任何额外的东西。标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。对于海外买家来说，申请保修可能需要漫长的等待。

输入设备

键盘

我们不能指责背光键盘的拥挤，因为对于其8英寸的外形因素来说，这是可以预期的。如果你打算经常在Win Max上打字，肯定需要一些时间来适应这种奇怪的布局和小键。

控制器的按钮使用起来不是很舒服。特别是肩部按钮的行程和反馈，分别太窄和太软。此外，操纵杆的运动范围非常窄，甚至比任天堂的Joy Cons还要小。因此，精确的动作在这里很难完成，特别是对于拇指较大的用户。

涡轮风扇模式可以用Fn+F键来切换。然而，屏幕上没有显示涡轮模式是否激活的指示灯，这意味着有时很难知道在任何特定时刻的风扇模式。

触摸板

支持Precision 的小型点击板（5.8 x 3.3厘米）具有出色的牵引力，在较慢的速度下有一点粘性。不幸的是，光标在缓慢滑行时可能会出现跳动和反应迟钝，这可能会使精确点击变得非常困难。

令人惊讶的是，在主要的QWERTY键之间，按键的反馈是坚定和统一的。因此，咔哒声比较大

显示

8英寸的触摸屏显然比Win 3的5.5英寸触摸屏要大，但这就是优势所在。从响应时间、亮度和色彩来看，其他一切都比Win 3的显示屏慢得多、暗得多、浅得多。这绝不是一个差劲的显示屏，但从我们在Win 3上的体验来看，它比我们所知道的制造商的能力要低一个档次。改用OLED实际上可以解决我们对这个特殊的IPS面板的重影、颜色和对比度的担忧。


346.2 cd/m²	371.9 cd/m²	362.2 cd/m²
344 cd/m²	374.6 cd/m²	371.1 cd/m²
344.9 cd/m²	368.5 cd/m²	367.1 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LT7911D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 374.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 361.2 cd/m² Minimum: 28.51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 374.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 832:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 5.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
47.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
47.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	GPD Win Max 2021 LT7911D, IPS, 8.00, 1280x800	GPD Win 3 IPS, 5.50, 1280x720	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AU Optronics AUO6496, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1200	Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AU Optronics B133HAN05.F, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080	Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Samsung, SDC414A, OLED, 13.30, 1920x1080	Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Samsung SDC4155 (ATNA33XC09-0), OLED, 13.30, 1920x1080
Display		31%	55%	50%		90%
Display P3 Coverage	47.2	59.5 26%	73.4 56%	69.7 48%		99.9 112%
sRGB Coverage	65.2	89.6 37%	99.8 53%	99.2 52%		100 53%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	47.6	61.4 29%	74.8 57%	71.4 50%		97.5 105%
Response Times		31%	21%	21%	40%	40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	56.8 ?(28.4, 28.4)	40 ?(22, 18) 30%	42.4 ?(22.4, 20) 25%	46.8 ?(20.8, 26) 18%	2 ?(1, 1) 96%	2 ?(1, 1) 96%
Response Time Black / White *	37.6 ?(22, 15.6)	25.6 ?(13.6, 12) 32%	31.6 ?(17.6, 14) 16%	28.8 ?(15.6, 13.2) 23%	2 ?(1, 1) 95%	2 ?(1, 1) 95%
PWM Frequency	201.6 ?(99)				60 -70%	60 ?(90) -70%
Screen		-11%	37%	22%	8%	33%
Brightness middle	374.6	468.8 25%	473.9 27%	291.5 -22%	353 -6%	390 4%
Brightness	361	460 27%	458 27%	294 -19%	359 -1%	368 2%
Brightness Distribution	92	93 1%	91 -1%	93 1%	95 3%	66 -28%
Black Level *	0.45	0.45 -0%	0.36 20%	0.19 58%	0.1 78%
Contrast	832	1042 25%	1316 58%	1534 84%	3530 324%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.21	9 -45%	2.99 52%	3.83 38%	3.98 36%	2.03 67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.89	15.5 -57%	4.35 56%	8.43 15%	53.07 -437%	3.14 68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	5.4	1.91 65%	1.1 80%	1.07 80%		3.1 43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.5	10.9 -142%	4 11%	6.2 -38%	1.41 69%	1.28 72%
Gamma	2.49 ^88%	2.13 ^103%	2.35 ^94%	2.2 ^100%	2.39 ^92%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	6726 ^97%	10972 ^59%	6269 ^104%	6469 ^100%	6346 ^102%	6359 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		56.6				87
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		89.2				100
Total Average (Program / Settings)		17% / 4%	38% / 38%	31% / 28%	24% / 17%	54% / 48%

* ... smaller is better

因此，虽然Win Max的显示屏比Win 3大，但后者的颜色更深、更准确。

X-Rite色度计的测量结果显示，色温略微偏冷。一旦正确校准，平均灰度和ColorChecker DeltaE值将分别从4.5提高到2.3和6.2提高到5.4。由于面板的色彩空间有限，颜色在较高的饱和度下仍然变得越来越不准确。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 28.4 ms rise
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

201.6 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

户外能见度只有在阴凉处才会好，因为那里的眩光更容易控制。我们建议禁用AMD Vari-Bright，否则在电池供电的情况下，最大亮度将自动从374尼特降至300尼特。

业绩

处理器

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U是为大型超极本设计的，所以在较小的8英寸外形尺寸上看到它是不常见的。原始多线程性能非常好，基本上与Ryzen 7 4700U齐头并进。 Ryzen 7 4700U甚至是 Ryzen 7 5800U.另一方面，单线程性能比竞争者的Core i7-1165G7慢15%至20%。酷睿i7-1165G7.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1274 (1269.36-1281.19)

GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø716 (710.19-722.13)

HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1313 (1297.77-1389.66)

Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø960 (551.99-995.3)

Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Intel Core i7-1165G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø498 (404.92-730.41)

Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Core i7-1165G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø644 (604.98-860.99)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (2943 - 3306, n=4)	3178 Points +8%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	3095 Points +5%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	3092 Points +5%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	2943 Points
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	2418 Points -18%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	2347 Points -20%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	2119 Points -28%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1842 Points -37%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	1640 Points -44%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	580 Points +21%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	552 Points +15%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	522 Points +9%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	481 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (474 - 488, n=4)	481 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	473 Points -2%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	463 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	456 Points -5%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	439 Points -9%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (7558 - 9762, n=3)	8565 Points +13%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	7872 (7780.83^min - 7871.73^max) Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	7719 Points +2%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	7558 (7503.87^min - 7557.75^max) Points
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	6348 (5673.44^min - 6347.79^max) Points -16%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5477 (5385.09^min - 5477.06^max) Points -28%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	4736 (4640.11^min - 4736.25^max) Points -37%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	4281 (3308.99^min - 4281.37^max) Points -43%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1507 Points +22%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1415 Points +15%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1364 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (1231 - 1240, n=3)	1235 Points 0%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	1231 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	1217 Points -1%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	1212 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1172 Points -5%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (1281 - 1639, n=3)	1444 Points +13%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1390 (1297.77^min - 1389.66^max) Points +9%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	1281 (1269.36^min - 1281.19^max) Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	1240 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	995 (551.99^min - 995.3^max) Points -22%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	934 (873.29^min - 934.25^max) Points -27%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	850 (812.27^min - 850.43^max) Points -34%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	722 (710.19^min - 722.13^max) Points -44%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	663 (525.18^min - 663.12^max) Points -48%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	229 Points +25%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	224 Points +22%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	200 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (182 - 187, n=3)	184 Points +1%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	183 Points
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	182 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	178 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	177 Points -3%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	172 Points -6%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	710 Seconds * -90%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	648 Seconds * -73%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	566 Seconds * -51%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	551 Seconds * -47%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	479 Seconds * -28%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	469 Seconds * -25%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	374 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (322 - 374, n=3)	345 Seconds * +8%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	331 Seconds * +11%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5405 MIPS +22%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	5405 MIPS +22%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	4761 MIPS +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (4420 - 4603, n=3)	4486 MIPS +1%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	4420 MIPS
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	4389 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	4362 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	4325 MIPS -2%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	4302 MIPS -3%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	43633 MIPS +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (38654 - 44804, n=3)	41192 MIPS +7%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	38654 MIPS
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	33282 MIPS -14%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	33250 MIPS -14%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	25815 MIPS -33%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	24436 MIPS -37%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	21683 MIPS -44%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	20740 MIPS -46%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1417 Points
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	1220 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (1150 - 1192, n=4)	1164 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	1121 Points

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (5798 - 6950, n=4)	6255 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	6243 Points
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	6234 Points
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	4924 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	10.4 fps +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (9.48 - 10.8, n=3)	10.2 fps +8%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	9.48 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	9.18 fps -3%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	7.59 fps -20%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	7.33 fps -23%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	7.05 fps -26%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	6.17 fps -35%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	5.6 fps -41%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	67.3 s * -10%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	66.4 s * -9%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	65.2 s * -7%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	61.1 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (57.8 - 62.6, n=3)	60.5 s * +1%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	57 s * +7%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	53.9 s * +12%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	48.7 s * +20%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	45.1 s * +26%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7	0.671 sec * -9%
GPD Win 3 Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.637 sec * -4%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	0.636 sec * -4%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	0.623 sec * -2%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	0.616 sec * -0%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	0.613 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (0.576 - 0.613, n=3)	0.601 sec * +2%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.566 sec * +8%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	0.54 sec * +12%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1281 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

69.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

183 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

PCMark 10的结果比我们的GPD Win 3略高，主要是由于与Core i5-1135G7相比，Ryzen 7 4800U上的额外核心。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5872 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5233 - 5383, n=3)	5291 Points +1%
GPD Win Max 2021 Vega 8, R7 4800U, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512	5233 Points
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	5209 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	4839 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	4763 Points -9%
GPD Win 3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB	4663 Points -11%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	10189 Points +9%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	10046 Points +7%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9899 Points +5%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	9789 Points +4%
GPD Win 3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB	9769 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (9188 - 9637, n=3)	9403 Points 0%
GPD Win Max 2021 Vega 8, R7 4800U, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512	9385 Points

PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9089 Points +12%
GPD Win Max 2021 Vega 8, R7 4800U, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512	8091 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7631 - 8091, n=3)	7879 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	7493 Points -7%
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	6986 Points -14%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6710 Points -17%
GPD Win 3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB	6336 Points -22%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6020 Points +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5123 - 5758, n=3)	5434 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	5231 Points +2%
GPD Win Max 2021 Vega 8, R7 4800U, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512	5123 Points
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	4632 Points -10%
GPD Win 3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB	4446 Points -13%
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	4121 Points -20%

PCMark 10 Score		5233 points
Help

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时存在DPC延迟问题。在我们长达1分钟的视频测试中，4K 60 FPS的视频播放很流畅，只有4个丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5262 μs * -97%
GPD Win Max 2021 Vega 8, R7 4800U, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512	2674 μs *
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	1345 μs * +50%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	909 μs * +66%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	903 μs * +66%
GPD Win 3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB	858 μs * +68%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Win Max配备了一个BIWIN NS200 PCIe 3固态硬盘，与我们在Win 3上发现的一样。性能比英特尔固态硬盘660p更快，特别是在连续写入率方面，但价格较高的三星PM981a仍然处于领先地位。

	GPD Win Max 2021 BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512	GPD Win 3 BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
AS SSD		4%	-44%	-69%	15%
Seq Read	1892	1585 -16%	1616 -15%	1860 -2%	2767 46%
Seq Write	1707	1776 4%	761 -55%	500 -71%	1368 -20%
4K Read	64.1	61.6 -4%	46.87 -27%	36.26 -43%	46.86 -27%
4K Write	163.6	208.9 28%	126.6 -23%	118.6 -28%	140.1 -14%
4K-64 Read	1142	1142 0%	324.6 -72%	419 -63%	954 -16%
4K-64 Write	980	1103 13%	815 -17%	219 -78%	1361 39%
Access Time Read *	0.038	0.03 21%	0.074 -95%	0.102 -168%	0.051 -34%
Access Time Write *	0.076	0.074 3%	0.135 -78%	0.17 -124%	0.022 71%
Score Read	1395	1362 -2%	533 -62%	641 -54%	1277 -8%
Score Write	1315	1489 13%	1018 -23%	388 -70%	1638 25%
Score Total	3430	3573 4%	1798 -48%	1300 -62%	3507 2%
Copy ISO MB/s	1520	1741 15%	906 -40%	880 -42%	2767 82%
Copy Program MB/s	654	543 -17%	614 -6%	185.3 -72%	1072 64%
Copy Game MB/s	1325	1318 -1%	539 -59%	212.7 -84%	1319 0%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		10%	-25%	-32%	6%
Write 4K	183.6	223 21%	128.3 -30%	89.2 -51%	143 -22%
Read 4K	70.1	66.5 -5%	50.9 -27%	33.09 -53%	50.2 -28%
Write Seq	1815	1857 2%	971 -47%	988 -46%	1963 8%
Read Seq	1721	1737 1%	1540 -11%	1322 -23%	1990 16%
Write 4K Q32T1	458.6	611 33%	538 17%	332.6 -27%	375 -18%
Read 4K Q32T1	552	688 25%	344.4 -38%	389.3 -29%	363.7 -34%
Write Seq Q32T1	1865	1948 4%	980 -47%	984 -47%	3086 65%
Read Seq Q32T1	2106	1995 -5%	1829 -13%	2461 17%	3382 61%
Write 4K Q8T8					405.6
Read 4K Q8T8					930
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / 6%	-35% / -37%	-51% / -55%	11% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2106 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1865 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 552 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 458.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1721 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1815 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 183.6 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU性能

来自我们的图形性能 Radeon RX Vega 8比集成RX Vega 8的Ryzen 5 4500U快30%至40%。 RX Vega 6.然而，它仍然比Core i5和Iris Xe 80 EU都低一个档次。 Iris Xe 80 EUs和酷睿i7 Iris Xe 96 EUs在大多数游戏中，正如我们下面的对比图所示。

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7	8114 Points +121%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	5358 Points +46%
GPD Win 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7	4846 Points +32%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7	4689 Points +28%
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7	4371 Points +19%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1694 - 5041, n=54)	3676 Points 0%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R7 4800U	3675 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	3579 Points -3%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R7 5800U	3399 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U	3200 Points -13%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	2945 Points -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	2874 Points -22%
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U	2854 Points -22%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	2586 Points -30%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7	2886 Points +147%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7	1968 Points +69%
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7	1595 Points +37%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	1512 Points +30%
GPD Win 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7	1354 Points +16%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R7 4800U	1167 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (540 - 1557, n=54)	1156 Points -1%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R7 5800U	1128 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	1076 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U	978 Points -16%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	886 Points -24%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	862 Points -26%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	851 Points -27%
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U	821 Points -30%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7	3015 Points +127%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7	2148 Points +62%
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7	1752 Points +32%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	1657 Points +25%
GPD Win 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7	1506 Points +13%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R7 4800U	1329 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (620 - 1781, n=55)	1317 Points -1%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R7 5800U	1283 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	1221 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U	1107 Points -17%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	990 Points -26%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	963 Points -28%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	961 Points -28%
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U	929 Points -30%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7	11538 Points +114%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7	8435 Points +56%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	6642 Points +23%
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7	6208 Points +15%
GPD Win 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7	5914 Points +10%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (3459 - 7591, n=54)	5910 Points +10%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R7 5800U	5842 Points +8%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R7 4800U	5397 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	5346 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U	5220 Points -3%
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U	4419 Points -18%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U	4173 Points -23%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	4132 Points -23%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3585 Points -34%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3560 Points -34%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7	9720 Points +137%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	6020 Points +47%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7	5782 Points +41%
GPD Win 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7	5707 Points +39%
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7	5203 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	4363 Points +6%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R7 4800U	4106 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3943 Points -4%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1708 - 5798, n=54)	3940 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R7 5800U	3748 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3707 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U	3632 Points -12%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	3544 Points -14%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U	3405 Points -17%
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U	3322 Points -19%

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark 11 Performance		5675 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		20095 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3368 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1329 points
Help

... in comparison

Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (54 - 115, n=6)	81.2 fps +89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (47 - 96, n=8)	75.9 fps +77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (58 - 64, n=7)	59.3 fps +38%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (24 - 67, n=86)	46.3 fps +8%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (22 - 71, n=31)	46 fps +7%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	43 (38^min - 52^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (38 - 45, n=3)	42.7 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (31 - 46, n=7)	39 fps -9%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (14 - 63, n=48)	38.8 fps -10%
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (66 - 74, n=3)	69.3 fps +201%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (41 - 52, n=3)	48.3 fps +110%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (32 - 34, n=3)	33.3 fps +45%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (15 - 48, n=39)	28.4 fps +23%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (15 - 47, n=16)	27.5 fps +20%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (15 - 35, n=13)	26.2 fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 ()	26 fps +13%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	23 (20^min - 28^max) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (48 - 66, n=6)	57.3 fps +187%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (24 - 41, n=7)	33.4 fps +67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (24 - 30, n=7)	27 fps +35%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14 - 34, n=84)	25.3 fps +27%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (13 - 34, n=31)	22.2 fps +11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9 - 31, n=45)	20.1 fps +1%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	20 (17^min - 26^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (17 - 20, n=3)	18.7 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (12 - 21, n=7)	17 fps -15%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (48 - 61, n=7)	53.4 fps +181%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (26 - 35, n=6)	29.2 fps +54%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10 - 31, n=82)	23.7 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (22 - 25, n=7)	23 fps +21%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (12 - 31, n=30)	20.5 fps +8%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	19 (17^min - 24^max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8 - 29, n=37)	19 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (14 - 18, n=3)	16.3 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (10 - 18, n=6)	14.8 fps -22%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (44 - 57, n=9)	51.4 fps +186%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (24 - 33, n=6)	27.5 fps +53%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11 - 29, n=68)	22.5 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (20 - 22, n=6)	21 fps +17%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (12 - 29, n=27)	19.3 fps +7%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	18 (15^min - 22^max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8 - 27, n=27)	17.5 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16 - 16, n=2)	16 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (9 - 16, n=6)	13.5 fps -25%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (98.4 - 186, n=6)	123.6 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (102.8 - 145, n=14)	122.9 fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (36.1 - 144, n=21)	121.1 fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (75.8 - 148, n=20)	120.7 fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (71 - 131, n=21)	108.5 fps +11%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (67.9 - 152, n=57)	108.1 fps +11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (36 - 148, n=207)	100 fps +2%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	97.7 (84^min) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (14.8 - 140.3, n=106)	91.2 fps -7%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (93.8 - 130, n=14)	110.6 fps +37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (69.1 - 136, n=20)	109.1 fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (35.5 - 133, n=21)	107.9 fps +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (82.9 - 162, n=6)	107.7 fps +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (21.8 - 109, n=21)	86.7 fps +7%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (49.9 - 122.3, n=57)	86.1 fps +7%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	80.7 (65.1^min) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (31.6 - 108.5, n=207)	75.5 fps -6%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (10.9 - 119.5, n=106)	67.7 fps -16%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (63.3 - 127, n=20)	99.2 fps +95%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (35.4 - 115, n=21)	87.7 fps +73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (64.1 - 88.4, n=14)	81.1 fps +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (67.1 - 78.5, n=6)	71 fps +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (8.6 - 77.4, n=21)	62 fps +22%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23.2 - 88.1, n=207)	53.8 fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (25.5 - 76.7, n=57)	51.8 fps +2%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	50.8 (44.6^min) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (10.4 - 70.9, n=106)	42.5 fps -16%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (58.5 - 119, n=20)	93.2 fps +94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (34.9 - 104.6, n=20)	79.9 fps +66%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (52.3 - 80.6, n=14)	72.5 fps +51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (60.2 - 68.9, n=6)	63.9 fps +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (7.8 - 67.5, n=21)	53.6 fps +11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (20.6 - 78.5, n=207)	49 fps +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (23.3 - 72, n=57)	48.6 fps +1%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	48.1 (42.4^min) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (7.8 - 66.1, n=107)	39.2 fps -19%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (54.8 - 87.4, n=4)	72.9 fps +107%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (27.6 - 72.2, n=16)	57.3 fps +62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (36.5 - 49.2, n=5)	44.8 fps +27%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=175)	39.2 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (33.7 - 41, n=5)	37 fps +5%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (21.9 - 50.1, n=52)	35.4 fps 0%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	35.3 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8.32 - 45.6, n=101)	31.5 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (23 - 36.9, n=7)	30 fps -15%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (47.7 - 52.4, n=5)	50.1 fps +185%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (25 - 34.5, n=13)	28.7 fps +63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (20.4 - 23.9, n=5)	22.4 fps +27%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 28, n=171)	21.7 fps +23%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (11.7 - 25, n=47)	17.9 fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16.4 - 19.4, n=5)	17.9 fps +2%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	17.6 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4.47 - 25.1, n=94)	17.3 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (12 - 17.4, n=6)	14.8 fps -16%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (31.8 - 37.6, n=6)	35.3 fps +176%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.15 - 27.8, n=164)	16.8 fps +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (12.7 - 21.2, n=10)	16.4 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (10.7 - 15.1, n=5)	13.8 fps +8%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4.01 - 22, n=85)	13 fps +2%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	12.8 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7.71 - 17.7, n=46)	12.4 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9.9 - 12.2, n=4)	11.3 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (7 - 10.9, n=5)	8.88 fps -31%

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (141 - 156, n=3)	147.7 fps +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (115 - 172, n=8)	142.9 fps +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (99.1 - 178, n=6)	130.1 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (92.2 - 145, n=3)	124.1 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (109 - 127.5, n=4)	117.7 fps +15%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	102 (18.8^min, 66.7^P1 - 161^max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (53.6 - 160, n=47)	100.4 fps -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (52 - 157, n=155)	97.5 fps -4%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (36.5 - 144.6, n=77)	83 fps -19%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (95.3 - 175, n=4)	136.8 fps +108%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (83.4 - 141, n=6)	105.2 fps +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (86.9 - 108.5, n=2)	97.7 fps +48%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (80.9 - 92.9, n=2)	86.9 fps +32%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (34.7 - 115.4, n=129)	72.7 fps +10%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	65.8 (15^min, 47.6^P1 - 121^max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (30.5 - 101, n=32)	64.2 fps -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (21.5 - 98.1, n=63)	61.7 fps -6%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (115 - 137.3, n=3)	129.6 fps +44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (95.8 - 160, n=9)	126.6 fps +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (91.6 - 170, n=5)	122.5 fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (83 - 137, n=3)	114.3 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (95.4 - 115.9, n=4)	102.2 fps +14%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	89.9 (14.6^min, 55.6^P1 - 148^max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (34 - 148, n=42)	87.7 fps -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (24.1 - 137, n=158)	82.2 fps -9%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (28.9 - 133.8, n=80)	70.4 fps -22%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (87.8 - 167, n=4)	129.7 fps +102%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (76.6 - 135, n=6)	103 fps +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (69 - 108.7, n=2)	88.9 fps +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (82.1 - 94.8, n=2)	88.5 fps +38%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (31.7 - 104, n=32)	65.5 fps +2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (20 - 109, n=130)	64.2 fps 0%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	64.1 (12.7^min, 45.5^P1 - 114^max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (18.8 - 97.2, n=63)	55.6 fps -13%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (67.7 - 102, n=6)	80.2 fps +186%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (30.6 - 68.3, n=11)	54.1 fps +93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (45.8 - 49.5, n=3)	47.4 fps +69%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (35.9 - 41.5, n=4)	38.4 fps +37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (25.1 - 35.9, n=3)	32 fps +14%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	28 (9.37^min, 20^P1 - 98.6^max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (13.8 - 40.6, n=44)	26.1 fps -7%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9.39 - 51.6, n=150)	22.7 fps -19%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (7.81 - 32, n=79)	18.4 fps -34%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (38.1 - 51.1, n=6)	43.2 fps +240%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (22.3 - 30.5, n=9)	24.6 fps +94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (9.1 - 23.7, n=3)	18.3 fps +44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (7.9 - 18.6, n=4)	15.3 fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (6.9 - 19.9, n=3)	14.5 fps +14%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	12.7 (1.793^min, 8.62^P1 - 71.3^max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (6 - 18.2, n=41)	11.1 fps -13%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4.13 - 22.9, n=144)	9.47 fps -25%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (3.07 - 11.6, n=66)	7.87 fps -38%

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (127 - 209, n=22)	167 fps +127%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (92.6 - 140, n=12)	112.1 fps +52%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (28.9 - 110, n=182)	83.9 fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (54.9 - 86, n=12)	77.3 fps +5%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	73.6 (69^min - 79^max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (27.2 - 89, n=47)	65.9 fps -10%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (30.2 - 97.4, n=98)	65.3 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (47.4 - 70, n=24)	60.8 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (42.6 - 72, n=24)	58.2 fps -21%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (89.7 - 126, n=20)	109.4 fps +142%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (34 - 81.4, n=14)	61.6 fps +36%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (21.4 - 74.1, n=180)	53.4 fps +18%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	45.3 (40^min - 50^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (35.2 - 51.9, n=13)	45.2 fps 0%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (21.8 - 56.9, n=100)	41.8 fps -8%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (19.6 - 55.2, n=35)	40.8 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (30 - 40, n=27)	35.3 fps -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (24.4 - 43.2, n=26)	34.3 fps -24%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (45 - 70.4, n=29)	61.7 fps +157%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (21 - 46, n=16)	34.8 fps +45%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.6 - 45.9, n=185)	28.6 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (20.6 - 29.9, n=13)	26.3 fps +10%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	24 (22^min - 26^max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9.3 - 33.5, n=98)	21.5 fps -10%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (8.7 - 26.8, n=46)	20.6 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16.3 - 23.1, n=27)	20.1 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (13.3 - 23.8, n=25)	19 fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (29.9 - 40.3, n=31)	35.6 fps +134%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (17.2 - 24.8, n=16)	20.8 fps +37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (10.1 - 17.5, n=12)	15.4 fps +1%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	15.2 (14^min - 17^max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.79 - 20.1, n=175)	14 fps -8%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7.07 - 17.6, n=49)	13.7 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9 - 16, n=24)	11.6 fps -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (6.5 - 17, n=25)	11.1 fps -27%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6.26 - 15.7, n=89)	11 fps -28%

X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (56.9 - 107, n=18)	83.6 fps +109%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (49.9 - 98.5, n=21)	76.3 fps +91%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (49.1 - 90.8, n=14)	68.1 fps +70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (48 - 82.7, n=5)	61 fps +53%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (18.8 - 73.6, n=17)	54.3 fps +36%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (26.9 - 64.9, n=57)	44.3 fps +11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13.4 - 88.4, n=207)	41.3 fps +3%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	40 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9.12 - 74.4, n=106)	36.3 fps -9%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (50.5 - 93.6, n=18)	71.7 fps +125%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (38.2 - 87.8, n=21)	62.9 fps +98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (35.5 - 72.3, n=14)	55.9 fps +76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (40.9 - 56, n=5)	47.6 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9.8 - 57, n=17)	40.9 fps +29%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.6 - 69.5, n=208)	35.2 fps +11%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (21.1 - 49.6, n=57)	34.6 fps +9%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	31.8 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6.45 - 40.5, n=107)	28.6 fps -10%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (44.5 - 77.3, n=18)	61.5 fps +120%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (35.4 - 71.4, n=20)	54.9 fps +97%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (30.2 - 63.7, n=14)	48 fps +72%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (36.7 - 52.3, n=5)	42.8 fps +53%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9.8 - 52.6, n=17)	39.4 fps +41%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.1 - 59.8, n=207)	31.6 fps +13%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (19.1 - 43.1, n=57)	30.5 fps +9%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	27.9 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5.55 - 36.3, n=105)	25.7 fps -8%

Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (161 - 195, n=5)	183 fps +135%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (61.4 - 137.7, n=12)	117 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (90.9 - 94.4, n=3)	92.7 fps +19%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (48.5 - 107.3, n=161)	84.6 fps +9%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (43 - 117, n=50)	78.6 fps +1%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	77.9 (53.1^min, 68.2^P1 - 113^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (71.3 - 80.5, n=2)	75.9 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 ()	75.3 fps -3%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (22.7 - 98.7, n=78)	67 fps -14%
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (73.8 - 91.5, n=5)	82.3 fps +159%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (38.6 - 53.2, n=11)	47.3 fps +49%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (18.2 - 48.3, n=159)	36.4 fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (31.7 - 35, n=3)	33 fps +4%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	31.8 (26.8^min, 28^P1 - 39.7^max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (16.9 - 45.3, n=49)	30.9 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (26.7 - 30.3, n=2)	28.5 fps -10%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6 - 48.8, n=80)	27.9 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 ()	26.8 fps -16%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (59.4 - 73.3, n=5)	66.1 fps +151%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (19.2 - 46.7, n=12)	39.2 fps +49%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (15.4 - 38.1, n=158)	29.2 fps +11%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	26.3 (18.3^min, 20.4^P1 - 52.3^max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (14.6 - 37.7, n=49)	26 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (24.6 - 27.2, n=3)	25.6 fps -3%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (11.4 - 32.3, n=77)	22.6 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (19.9 - 23.1, n=2)	21.5 fps -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 ()	20.9 fps -21%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (49.9 - 61.6, n=5)	55.9 fps +146%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (18.9 - 36.6, n=12)	29 fps +28%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13.2 - 30.8, n=156)	23.6 fps +4%
GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	22.7 (14.5^min, 16.1^P1 - 63^max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (12.8 - 32.1, n=47)	22.2 fps -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (13.6 - 26.2, n=53)	19.6 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (18.8 - 20.1, n=3)	19.3 fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (15.7 - 16.9, n=2)	16.3 fps -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 ()	16.1 fps -29%

怠速运行 Witcher 3在低设置下显示出相对较差的性能一致性。在测试开始时，帧率会高达55FPS，然后下降到45FPS，然后再跳起来。性能甚至暂时下降到15FPS，表明背景活动影响了游戏性能。

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8: Ø51.9 (13-55)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	102	89.9	28	12.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)	73.6	45.3	24	15.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	97.7	80.7	50.8	48.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	35.3	17.6	12.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	40	31.8	27.9
Far Cry 5 (2018)	43	20	19	18
Strange Brigade (2018)	77.9	31.8	26.3	22.7

Emissions

系统噪音

风扇噪音在很大程度上取决于是否切换了涡轮风扇模式。如果激活，在低至中度负荷（如网络浏览或视频流）时，风扇将频繁地脉冲，达到35 dB(A)或更高。在Turbo模式下玩游戏时，风扇噪音会超过49 dB(A)，比大多数ULV超极本的噪音还要大。

如果关闭Turbo模式，即使在游戏时，风扇噪音最大也只有34 dB(A)，明显更安静，更容易忍受。最重要的是，禁用涡轮增压模式只会影响温度，而不会影响性能，这意味着用户仍然可以从系统中获得全部性能，而不需要将风扇逼到最大。

风扇噪音曲线（白色。背景，红色。系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：Witcher 3 ，绿色。Prime95+FurMark压力)

	GPD Win Max 2021 Vega 8, R7 4800U, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512	GPD Win 3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Noise		-2%	17%	9%	-3%
off / environment *	23.3	27.4 -18%	23.9 -3%	25.1 -8%	27 -16%
Idle Minimum *	26.6	29.1 -9%	23.9 10%	25.1 6%	27 -2%
Idle Average *	26.6	29.1 -9%	23.9 10%	25.1 6%	27 -2%
Idle Maximum *	26.6	29.1 -9%	23.9 10%	25.1 6%	27 -2%
Load Average *	46.9	40.7 13%	32.2 31%	41 13%	46 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	49	42.8 13%	34.7 29%	38.6 21%
Load Maximum *	49.2	46.3 6%	34.8 29%	38.7 21%	46.6 5%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle		26.6 / 26.6 / 26.6 dB(A)
Load		46.9 / 49.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)

温度

在涡轮风扇模式激活的情况下，游戏时的热点在点击板上只有38℃左右。靠近后角的键盘和控制器按钮等重要区域仍然比较凉爽舒适。当Turbo风扇关闭时，表面温度将略微升高。

Max. Load

Idle


33.2 °C	38 °C	32.2 °C
31.2 °C	33.6 °C	32 °C
28.2 °C	28.6 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 31.7 °C


26.2 °C	36.4 °C	30.2 °C
28.8 °C	29.2 °C	28.2 °C
28 °C	28.2 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 36.4 °C
Average: 29.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 49.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the devices in the class UMPC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F, ranging from 30 to 55 °C for the class UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 38.6 °C / 101 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.6 °C / 89 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.3 °C / -0.6 F).

压力测试

当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时，时钟速率会在最初几秒钟内提升到2.4GHz，然后略微下降并稳定在2.2GHz。

有趣的是，涡轮风扇模式并没有提高游戏性能，因为CPU和GPU的时钟速率保持不变。相反，CPU温度将下降近10摄氏度，如果需要的话，为用户提供额外的超频空间。

用电池供电运行不会限制性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数，分别为11664和5492分，而在主电源上则为11658和5397分。

	CPU时钟(GHz)	GPU时钟(MHz)	CPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲	--	--	49
Prime95压力	2.2	--	58
Prime95 + FurMark压力	2.3	600	55
Witcher 3 压力（涡轮风扇关闭）	1.4	1400	76
Witcher 3 Stress (Turbo fan on)	1.4	1375	67

发言人

最大音量下的粉红噪音。在750赫兹左右出现滚落，显示出低频再现不良和 "尖锐 "的音频质量。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

GPD Win Max 2021 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 22% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 19%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management

消耗功率

在没有运行应用程序的情况下，在桌面上空转，根据亮度水平和电源配置文件，消耗5W至8W，这与许多ULV笔记本电脑惊人地相似。使用小型（约6.4 x 5.5 x 2.8厘米）的65瓦USB-C交流适配器，游戏消耗约37瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.87 / 0.87 Watt
Idle	5.2 / 6.5 / 7.4 Watt
Load	37.2 / 39 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512, IPS, 1280x800, 8.00	GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB, IPS, 1280x720, 5.50	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.30	Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.30	Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.30
Power Consumption		22%	1%	-1%	3%	11%
Idle Minimum *	5.2	2.9 44%	3.4 35%	5 4%	4.4 15%	3.6 31%
Idle Average *	6.5	4.5 31%	6.9 -6%	6.3 3%	7.4 -14%	6.3 3%
Idle Maximum *	7.4	4.5 39%	8 -8%	6.9 7%	11.3 -53%	7.6 -3%
Load Average *	37.2	38.5 -3%	42.6 -15%	41.5 -12%	22 41%	31 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	38.1	28.9 24%	35.2 8%	33.2 13%	22.8 40%
Load Maximum *	39	41.4 -6%	43.1 -11%	46.5 -19%	42.5 -9%	36 8%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

GPD Win Max 2021; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø38.1 (36.5-39)

GPD Win Max 2021; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø38.7 (36.3-39.4)

电池寿命

57瓦，内部电池比预期的手持设备要大。在浏览网页时，我们能挤出9个多小时，在不停地玩游戏时，能挤出2到3个小时。

从空电到满电大约需要90分钟。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		9h 15min

	GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8, 57 Wh	GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 44 Wh	HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8, 43 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7, 60 Wh	Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh	Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh
Battery Runtime		22%	-3%	43%	15%	15%
WiFi v1.3	555	675 22%	539 -3%	791 43%	639 15%	640 15%
Load		79	105	121	203	182
Reader / Idle			1133	1050	1227
Witcher 3 ultra						190

Pros

+ 涡轮风扇不工作时，比预期的要安静

+ 快速的多线程CPU性能

+ 易于升级的M.2 NVMe SSD

+ 大量的集成端口

+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- USB-C端口不支持DisplayPort-out或Thunderbolt

- 没有Wi-Fi 6；WLAN性能缓慢

- 游戏时有明显的重影现象

- 色域狭窄

- 吱吱作响的机箱

结论--有希望，但需要更多努力

在审查中。GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U。测试装置由GPD提供

我们喜欢Windows 10 UMPC的概念，它足够强大，可用于720p游戏，Ryzen 7 4800U在这方面能够实现。然而，围绕处理器的实际包装需要改进。机箱吱吱作响，不舒服，小操纵杆的运动范围太窄，触摸板是跳动的，没有集成网络摄像头，我们的MicroSD读卡器甚至不能工作。按照今天的标准，集成的WLAN很慢，不支持DP-over-USB，而且显示屏更倾向于预算范围，而不是高端或中端范围，不支持自适应同步。

性能令人钦佩，甚至可以与最新一批Tiger Lake 超极本相媲美。然而，围绕着处理器的硬件和显示屏需要更多的微调，才能真正将其击倒在地。

较长的电池寿命，涡轮模式下相对安静的风扇噪音，以及令人满意的按键反馈都值得称赞。然而，我们与Win Max相处的时间越长，就越难忽视更多的小问题。建议使用酷睿i7版本，以最大限度地提高游戏性能，而我们的Ryzen 7 SKU将是最大化原始多线程CPU性能的理想选择。

价格和可用性

截至本文撰写时，Win Max 2021尚未在各在线零售商中广泛销售。GPD正计划从今年10月开始供货。

GPD Win Max 2021 - 2021-08-30 08/30/2021 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis

65%

Keyboard

56 / 80 → 70%

Pointing Device

57%

Connectivity

47 / 65 → 73%

Weight

77 / 35-88 → 80%

Battery

87%

Display

80%

Games Performance

64 / 68 → 94%

Application Performance

91 / 76 → 100%

Temperature

92%

Noise

79 / 91 → 87%

Audio

74 / 85 → 87%

Average

67%

79%

UMPC - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5192 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 22339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > GPD Win Max 2021手持式游戏笔记本电脑评测。Ryzen 7比Core i7更慢

Allen Ngo, 2021-08-30 (Update: 2021-08-30)

GPD Win Max 2021手持式游戏笔记本电脑评测。Ryzen 7比Core i7更慢

potential competitors in comparison

案例

连接性

SD卡阅读器

沟通

维护

配件和保修

输入设备

键盘

触摸板

显示

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

业绩

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

系统性能

DPC延时

存储设备

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU性能

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Emissions

系统噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

GPD Win Max 2021 audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Energy Management

消耗功率

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论--有希望，但需要更多努力

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare