Notebookcheck

Intel HD Graphics 505

Intel HD Graphics 505

英特尔高清显卡500是Apollo Lake架构处理器搭配的图形处理器单元(如奔腾N4200),在2016年年中发布。这块显卡主要特性为较低的功耗,但表现较弱,远远无法满足最新游戏的要求。作为部分采用Apollo Lake架构的显卡,高清显卡505配有18个执行单元(EU),运行频率最高可达750MHz。这款显卡的技术规格基于英特尔第9代架构,它也用于更高端的SKYLAKE架构系列处理器。

由于缺乏专用显存或eDRAM缓存,HD 500需经由处理器访问主内存(2个64位DDR3L- / LPDDR3-1866,LPDDR4-2400)。

性能

高清显卡500应该比较老的酷睿M的高清显卡 5300稍慢,所以最新游戏(2016年)即使是最低设置下也将几乎无法在流畅运行。

特性

改进后的视频引擎现在可以更加高效地硬件解码H.265 / HEVC。最多三个显示器可以通过 DP/eDP或HDMI(通过HDMI 1.4 4K可能只能达到30赫兹)连接。

功耗

整个赛扬N3450芯片的热设计功率默认是6瓦,因此该显卡主要用于(通常采用被动冷却)上网本或轻薄笔记本。它的TDP也可以减少到4瓦,但是这显然会影响性能。

ManufacturerIntel
Gen. 9 Series
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 72 @ 350 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 48 @ 300 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 48 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 350 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 24 @ 300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
CodenameApollo Lake
ArchitectureIntel Gen. 9 (Apollo Lake)
Pipelines18 - unified
Core Speed300 - 750 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Memory Type(LP)DDR3(L) / LPDDR4
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_1)
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement01.09.2016
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium N42004 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz750 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 87     avg: 100.7     median: 97 (1%)     max: 118 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 76     avg: 88     median: 85 (1%)     max: 103 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 27199     avg: 32669.2     median: 31012 (6%)     max: 41454 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 18860     avg: 22880.7     median: 20939 (3%)     max: 28843 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 2411     avg: 2880     median: 2774.5 (5%)     max: 3558 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 2844     avg: 3607.7     median: 3412 (2%)     max: 4738 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 324     avg: 423.8     median: 407.5 (2%)     max: 565 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 344     avg: 456.2     median: 445 (1%)     max: 606 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 29561     avg: 35633     median: 36602.5 (5%)     max: 39766 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 476     avg: 679.9     median: 669.5 (2%)     max: 899 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 424     avg: 620.2     median: 611 (1%)     max: 825 points
...
AMD Radeon HD 7480D -6%
AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri) -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8400 -1%
Intel HD Graphics 505
AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 0%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G 1%
Intel HD Graphics 4200 1%
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G 9%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop) 6783%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
8.9 fps (4%)
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 +
Tcvis 1920x1080 +
SolidWorks 1920x1080 +
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 +
Maya 1920x1080 +
Lightwave 1920x1080 +
Ensight 1920x1080 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
18.9 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
29.2 fps (8%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
10.3 fps (3%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
16.6 fps (14%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
62 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
93 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
382 Points (2%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
14.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
5.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF TAA 1366x768
7.7
low 1280x720
14.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
3.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
5.6 6.1 6.2 8.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4 4 4.1 4.5 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.9  fps    + Compare