Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 505

Intel HD Graphics 505

英特尔高清显卡500是Apollo Lake架构处理器搭配的图形处理器单元(如奔腾N4200),在2016年年中发布。这块显卡主要特性为较低的功耗,但表现较弱,远远无法满足最新游戏的要求。作为部分采用Apollo Lake架构的显卡,高清显卡505配有18个执行单元(EU),运行频率最高可达750MHz。这款显卡的技术规格基于英特尔第9代架构,它也用于更高端的SKYLAKE架构系列处理器。

由于缺乏专用显存或eDRAM缓存,HD 500需经由处理器访问主内存(2个64位DDR3L- / LPDDR3-1866,LPDDR4-2400)。

性能

高清显卡500应该比较老的酷睿M的高清显卡 5300稍慢,所以最新游戏(2016年)即使是最低设置下也将几乎无法在流畅运行。

特性

改进后的视频引擎现在可以更加高效地硬件解码H.265 / HEVC。最多三个显示器可以通过 DP/eDP或HDMI(通过HDMI 1.4 4K可能只能达到30赫兹)连接。

功耗

整个赛扬N3450芯片的热设计功率默认是6瓦,因此该显卡主要用于(通常采用被动冷却)上网本或轻薄笔记本。它的TDP也可以减少到4瓦,但是这显然会影响性能。

Gen. 9 Series

Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameApollo Lake
ArchitectureGen. 9 Apollo Lake
Pipelines18 - unified
Core Speed300 - 750 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement01.09.2016
CPU in HD Graphics 505GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium N42004 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz750 MHz
Intel Atom x7-E39504 x 1600 MHz, 12 W500 MHz650 MHz
min. - max.200 - 500 MHz650 - 750 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.2 pt (1%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -64%
...
0.149 -20%
AMD Radeon HD 8280
0.1494 -20%
0.1562 -16%
AMD Radeon HD 8330
0.1599 -14%
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
0.1651 -11%
0.1651 -11%
0.1699 -9%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
0.1767 -5%
AMD Radeon HD 8400
0.1827 -2%
Intel HD Graphics 505
0.1859
0.1911 3%
Intel HD Graphics 4200
0.1966 6%
Intel UHD Graphics 600
0.1972 6%
AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
0.1975 6%
0.2 8%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
0.2068 11%
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
0.2109 13%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G
0.2116 14%
AMD Radeon HD 8610G
0.2164 16%
...
21.1 11250%
max:
33.3 17813%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 87     avg: 115.8     median: 107.5 (0%)     max: 161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 76     avg: 101.5     median: 94 (0%)     max: 142 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 11%
...
Intel HD Graphics 505
101.5
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 6%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 11%
168.2 66%
Intel UHD Graphics 610
194 91%
194.5 92%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
205 102%
Intel HD Graphics 530
235 132%
243.7 140%
Intel UHD Graphics 615
244.7 141%
...
19434 19047%
max:
36485 35846%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 27199     avg: 32979     median: 32480.5 (4%)     max: 41454 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 8531     avg: 19014     median: 18860 (2%)     max: 28843 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 2411     avg: 2877     median: 2837.5 (3%)     max: 3558 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2844     avg: 3609     median: 3413.5 (1%)     max: 4738 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 324     avg: 417.3     median: 383 (1%)     max: 565 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 344     avg: 448.6     median: 408 (0%)     max: 606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 26964     avg: 33899     median: 36228 (4%)     max: 39766 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 476     avg: 692     median: 679 (1%)     max: 899 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 424     avg: 632     median: 620 (1%)     max: 825 Points
171.8 -73%
...
582 -8%
584 -8%
585 -7%
597 -6%
599 -5%
AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
611 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8400
615 -3%
Intel HD Graphics 4200
624 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
624 -1%
Intel HD Graphics 505
632
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
641 1%
648 3%
Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
650 3%
650 3%
656 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G
678 7%
685 8%
700 11%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
701 11%
...
59943 9385%
max:
106023 16676%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 1957     avg: 2351     median: 2350.5 (1%)     max: 2744 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 1656     avg: 2073     median: 2072.5 (1%)     max: 2489 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -97%
...
1896 -9%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850
1928 -7%
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
1930 -7%
1938 -7%
Intel HD Graphics 4200
1985 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
2012 -3%
2018 -3%
2031 -2%
2039 -2%
Intel HD Graphics 505
2073
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
2092 1%
2098 1%
2111 2%
2156 4%
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
2196 6%
2201 6%
2203 6%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
2207 6%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
2212 7%
...
132443 6289%
max:
170928 8145%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 3721     avg: 4303     median: 4302.5 (6%)     max: 4884 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
8.9 fps (2%)
0.6 -93%
...
7.45 -16%
7.617 -14%
7.675 -14%
7.7 -13%
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
7.8 -12%
8.1 -9%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
8.35 -6%
8.7 -2%
8.867 0%
Intel HD Graphics 505
8.9
9 1%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
9 1%
9.1 2%
9.3 4%
9.585 8%
9.7 9%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
9.8 10%
9.9 11%
10.05 13%
...
532 5878%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
0.9 fps (1%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
1.2 fps (1%)
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
6.6 fps (5%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
0.8 fps (1%)
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
5.6 fps (4%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
8.7 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
1.3 fps (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 32.61     avg: 2776     median: 3155 (2%)     max: 3331 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 9.78     avg: 12.1     median: 12.5 (4%)     max: 13.53 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 11.3     avg: 16.1     median: 16.6 (1%)     max: 19.87 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.7     avg: 97.8     median: 97.8 (98%)     max: 97.8 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
4.8 fps (1%)
3.3 -31%
3.6 -25%
Intel UHD Graphics 600
3.675 -23%
Intel HD Graphics 505
4.8
4.85 1%
Intel UHD Graphics 610
5.4 13%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
6.35 32%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
6.7 40%
Intel UHD Graphics 615
7.05 47%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
9.3 94%
10.45 118%
11 129%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
11.4 138%
...
536 11067%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
12 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 10     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (1%)     max: 10.3 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
14.1 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
18.9 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
47.2 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 62     avg: 87     median: 87 (0%)     max: 112 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 93     avg: 141.5     median: 141.5 (0%)     max: 190 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
382 points (0%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
19 Watt (3%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
4.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
3.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
14.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21.4 26.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
22
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
5.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF TAA 1366x768
7.7
low 1280x720
14.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
3.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
5.6 6.1 6.2 8.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4 4 4.1 4.5 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
6.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
10.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
11.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
25.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
20.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
36.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
9.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
7.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
10.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
75.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
14.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
51.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
6.5 7.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.2 5.1 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
3.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
17.1 20.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.5 15.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.3 9.5 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
36.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
19.4 21 21.2 21.3 22.2 22.9 23.7 23.9 24.6 24.9 25.4 25.5 30.3 30.6 32.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.3 10.2 10.7 10.8 12.2 12.9 13.3 13.6 14 14.2 14.4 17.3 17.5 18.6 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.2 9.4 10.9 10.9 11 11.3 11.5 11.5 12 15.1 16.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.5 3.1 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
31.2 42.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4 21.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
34.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35 36.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.9 31 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
30.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
31.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
31.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
47.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
25.2  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
15.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
69.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
62.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
25.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Just Cause 44.8
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider2
Monster Hunter World3.7
Far Cry 53
X-Plane 11.115.5
Star Wars Battlefront 22.8
Need for Speed Payback2
Assassin´s Creed Origins2
ELEX4.6
F1 201713
Team Fortress 22825.2
Dirt 414.7
Rocket League2415.3
Prey5.4
Ghost Recon Wildlands5.9
For Honor12.1
Resident Evil 714.4
Titanfall 22.3
Civilization VI9.7
Deus Ex Mankind Divided5.1
Overwatch7.1
The Division5.23.1
Far Cry Primal3
Rise of the Tomb Raider74
Rainbow Six Siege158.9
Just Cause 36.64.1
Star Wars Battlefront10.96.3
Anno 220511.86.5
World of Warships25.216.4
Metal Gear Solid V20.713.8
Dota 2 Reborn3222
Dirt Rally36.512.7
GTA V9.54.3
Battlefield Hardline7.36.9
Dragon Age: Inquisition10.67.5
F1 20142814
Alien: Isolation18.314.1
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor12.47.7
Sims 475.218.4
Risen 3: Titan Lords14.29.3
GRID: Autosport51.519
Thief753.5
Battlefield 419149
GRID 236.819.412.5
BioShock Infinite2513123
Tomb Raider372011.2
Dead Space 334.616.913.5
Counter-Strike: GO363121.2
Diablo III30.119.617
Anno 207031.114.89.3
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim21.111.67.1
Deus Ex Human Revolution31.318.9
Dirt 347.225.215.7
StarCraft 269.715.99.7
World of Warcraft62.325.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
42
11
3
33
1

13


1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 24. 16:56:45

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.055s ... 0.056s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.056s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.056s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.056s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.056s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.056s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.056s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.056s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.057s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.057s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.057s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.057s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.057s

#16 composed specs +0s ... 0.057s

#17 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#18 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.057s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 7542 +0.028s ... 0.085s

#20 got single benchmarks 7542 +0.065s ... 0.15s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.15s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +0.677s ... 0.827s

#23 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.827s

#24 Got 158 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.843s

#25 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.843s

#26 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.043s ... 0.886s

#27 benchmarks composed for output. +1.082s ... 1.968s

#28 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 1.971s

#29 return log +0s ... 1.971s

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics 505 graphics card

$440的4K笔记本:Chuwi LapBook Plus评测

$440的4K笔记本:Chuwi LapBook Plus评测

它具有1000美元的Ultrabook的外观,但只有100美元的上网本的性能。有一个很好的理由使您在市场上看不到很多配备4K UHD显示屏的Intel Atom笔记本电脑。它们实在很不平衡。...
Intel Atom x7-E3950 | Intel HD Graphics 505 | 15.60" | 1.5 kg
华硕 VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH (N4200, HD) 笔记本电脑简短评测

华硕 VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH (N4200, HD) 笔记本电脑简短评测

不值一提。 该华硕变形本拥有Apollo Lake处理器,提供了大量的存储空间。电池续航时间勉强算是平均水平。价格接近500欧元(约560美元),该设备不算是最实惠的型号之一。...
Intel Pentium N4200 | Intel HD Graphics 505 | 11.60" | 1.3 kg
戴尔 Latitude 3189 (N4200, HD) 变形本简短评测

戴尔 Latitude 3189 (N4200, HD) 变形本简短评测

为坚硬而生! 戴尔将11.6英寸笔记本以及一块节能CPU组合起来。根据厂商的说法,这个组合能够使这台笔记本在日常学校使用中坚持一整天的时间。我们决定仔细检查这些说法,通过我们详尽的评测来找出Latitude 3189是否能够遵守这些诺言。...
Intel Pentium N4200 | Intel HD Graphics 505 | 11.60" | 1.4 kg
戴尔 Latitude 3180 (N4200, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

戴尔 Latitude 3180 (N4200, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

经久不衰。 这台11.6寸的Latitude设备搭配了高速固态硬盘,运行安静而续航持久。戴尔为它制定的价位不低,零售价为580欧元(约4357人民币)。预装Windows 10专业版系统应该是它定价较高的主要原因。...
Intel Pentium N4200 | Intel HD Graphics 505 | 11.60" | 1.6 kg
宏碁 Aspire ES1-533-P7WA 笔记本电脑简短评测

宏碁 Aspire ES1-533-P7WA 笔记本电脑简短评测

全高清家庭办公。 这台15.6寸的宏碁笔记本电脑搭配了一块磨砂全高清屏幕——这在入门级市场十分罕见。这台笔记本电脑提供了大容量存储空间,同时发热量较低:一台简单的家庭办公笔记本。...
Intel Pentium N4200 | Intel HD Graphics 505 | 15.60" | 2.4 kg

Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  Review » 宏碁 Aspire ES1-332-P91H 笔记本电脑简短评测

Asus Chromebook C423NA-EB0243: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook C423NA-EB0243

Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1HT-P1BM: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1HT-P1BM

Asus Chromebook Z1500CN-EJ0165: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Z1500CN-EJ0165

Asus Chromebook Z1400CN-BV0305: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Z1400CN-BV0305

Chuwi LapBook Plus: Intel Atom x7-E3950, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Chuwi LapBook Plus

Acer Chromebook 14 CB514-1HT-P2D1: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 14 CB514-1HT-P2D1

Acer Chromebook 14 CB514-1HT-P1BM: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 14 CB514-1HT-P1BM

Trekstor Surfbook A13-P: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Trekstor Surfbook A13-P

Acer Aspire ES1-732-P7YA: Intel Pentium N4200, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire ES1-732-P7YA

Acer Chromebook Spin 15 CP315-1H: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Spin 15 CP315-1H

Acer Chromebook C523NA-IH24T: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook C523NA-IH24T

Acer Spin 1 SP111-32N-P1PR: Intel Pentium N4200, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 1 SP111-32N-P1PR

Lenovo IdeaPad 120S-14IAP-81A500EDGE: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 120S-14IAP-81A500EDGE

Trekstor Primebook P14B: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Trekstor Primebook P14B

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA

Acer Chromebook Spin 15 CP315-1H-P75Z: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Spin 15 CP315-1H-P75Z

Acer Chromebook 15 CB515-1HT-P099: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 15 CB515-1HT-P099

Acer Chromebook Spin 15 CP315-1H-P1K8: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Spin 15 CP315-1H-P1K8

Asus X540NA-GQ151T: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus X540NA-GQ151T

Acer Aspire ES1-533-P5MS: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire ES1-533-P5MS

Acer Aspire 3 A315-31-P3ZM: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-31-P3ZM

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15IAP-80XR0094GE: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15IAP-80XR0094GE

Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P7SF: Intel Pentium N4200, 12.20", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P7SF

Acer Chromebook 15 CB515-1HT-P80X: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 15 CB515-1HT-P80X

Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P72F: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P72F

Acer Chromebook 15 CB515-1HT-P39B: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 15 CB515-1HT-P39B

Medion Akoya E3216-MD61800: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya E3216-MD61800

Acer Aspire ES1-533-P8BX: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire ES1-533-P8BX

Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P56D: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P56D

Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P3P0: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P3P0

Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P3FT: Intel Pentium N4200, 12.20", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P3FT

Asus VivoBook E14 E403NA-GA016T: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook E403NA-GA016T

Acer Spin 1 SP111-32N-P9VD: Intel Pentium N4200, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 1 SP111-32N-P9VD

Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IAP-80TG00W3GE: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IAP-80TG00W3GE

Acer TravelMate Spin B1 B118-RN-P6BE: Intel Pentium N4200, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate Spin B1 B118-RN-P6BE

Medion Akoya E3215-MD60794: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya E3215-MD60794

HP Pavilion x360 11-ad051nr: Intel Pentium N4200, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion x360 11-ad051nr

Acer Switch 3 SW312-31P: Intel Pentium N4200, 12.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Switch 3 SW312-31P

Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P5CK: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P5CK

Asus Vivobook E14 L403NA-FA017TS: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook E14 L403NA-FA017TS

Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P63H: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P63H

Medion Akoya E3216-MD60900: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya E3216-MD60900

Acer Chromebook 15 CB515-1HT-P58C: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 15 CB515-1HT-P58C

BTO Notebooks U-BOOK 14CL23: Intel Pentium N4200, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » BTO Notebooks U-BOOK 14CL23

Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T: Intel Pentium N4200, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T

Dell Latitude 3189: Intel Pentium N4200, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 3189

Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP

Acer Aspire ES1-533-P2V5: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire ES1-533-P2V5

Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG: Intel Pentium N4200, 12.20", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG

Acer Aspire A315-31-P72U: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire A315-31-P72U

Acer Aspire ES1-533-P6NL: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire ES1-533-P6NL

Acer Aspire ES1-132-P065: Intel Pentium N4200, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire ES1-132-P065

Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP

Acer Aspire ES1-332-P7SA: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire ES1-332-P7SA

Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IAP-80TG00W8GE: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IAP-80TG00W8GE

Acer Spin 1 SP113-31-P0ZN: Intel Pentium N4200, 13.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 1 SP113-31-P0ZN

Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IAP 80TG00W4GE: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IAP 80TG00W4GE

Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-P40B: Intel Pentium N4200, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-P40B

Acer Aspire ES1-533-P591: Intel Pentium N4200, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire ES1-533-P591

HP ProBook x360 11-G1: Intel Pentium N4200, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook x360 11-G1

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter