联想ThinkPad E14 G4 AMD笔记本电脑评论:经济实惠,没有大的弱点
虽然联想之前推出了更明亮的显示选项,包括100% sRGB,但在 的直接前辈在ThinkPad E14的直接前身中,第四代商务笔记本的进步主要围绕着性能,这甚至比更昂贵的T系列略高,而且你还得到了一个更好的键盘。除了良好的硬件外,这两点都是非常具有决定性的,这取决于笔记本电脑的使用方式。与其他流行的ThinkPad系列的进一步差异将在本评论中揭示。
只有处理器选项是新的,但这些也只是AMD的Zen 2架构的刷新(Barcelo-U),在E14 Gen 3中已经发现。我们的测试实验室仔细研究了885欧元(约950美元)的 "21EB0041GE "型号,其八核的AMD Ryzen 7 5825U16GB DDR4内存(可扩展),512GB PCIe 3.0 SSD和全高清IPS显示屏(宣传的峰值亮度为300 cd/m²)。作为校园版,这款移动商务笔记本的价格并不便宜,为869欧元(约合935美元),但六核CPU和无操作系统也可能是649欧元(约合700美元)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.5 % | 06/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE R7 5825U, Vega 8 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86.7 % | 08/2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85.3 % | 03/2023 | HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 20.4 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85.2 % | 04/2021 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.8 % | 01/2022 | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 20.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.6 % | 09/2022 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE R5 5625U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 22 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳:坚固的黑色ThinkPad E14 G4
联想ThinkPad典型的黑色外壳自第二代以来一直没有改变。第2代、但也有银色的选择。低价反映了材料的选择,即塑料(掌托和显示屏边缘)和黑色阳极氧化铝(盖子和底部)的组合。尽管如此,稳定性还是非常好。底部装置可以抵御扭转压力,盖子可以抵御对背部的目标压力。铰链也令人愉快地牢固,但用一只手打开是不可能的。
光滑的表面看起来并不像ThinkPad T14那样高质量。 ThinkPad T14或 T14s而且非常容易沾染指纹。总的来说,这个箱子给人留下了良好的印象,尤其是考虑到价格低廉。
ThinkPad E14是我们的对比组中最重的14英寸产品,重量为1.6公斤,但比大多数对手要薄。虽然屏幕的侧边非常窄,但这并不适用于顶部和底部的边缘。因此,该设备的构建深度也明显大于对比设备的深度。
设备:千兆位网络,1,080p凸轮和两个SSD插槽
两年来,在端口方面也没有什么变化。过时的USB-A 2.0和HDMI 1.4b仍然在船上。至少有千兆位网络(可选)和一个带有DisplayPort 1.2和充电功能的USB-C 3.2 Gen 1。然而,充电时如果没有适配器或对接方案,就不能使用USB-C外围设备。
沟通
几乎使用了与前代ThinkPad相同的Realtek WiFi 6适配器,这也反映在平庸的WLAN速度上,最高为~1 Gbps。一个英特尔AX201或AX211,如在戴尔Latitude 14 5420或惠普 ProBook 440 G9显著更快,与两年前的ThinkPad E14 G2的英特尔AX200相似。不提供WWAN型号。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN |
网络摄像头
一个小但真正的升级是内置的1080p网络摄像头,与前代产品的720p版本相比。它更清晰,噪音更小,但仍然只能用于最简单的视频通话。包括一个物理快门(ThinkShutter),我们的机型还有一个用于Windows Hello的红外摄像头。
安全问题
在安全方面,有红外摄像头、物理摄像头光圈、TPM 2.0、Kensington锁和集成在电源按钮上的可选指纹扫描仪,它们在我们的测试设备上快速而完美地工作。在软件方面,与T系列的ThinkPad相比,你不得不放弃Mirametrix Glance和人类存在检测。
辅料
盒子里只包括65W的USB-C电源。值得称赞的是,包装材料几乎没有使用塑料。
维护
在打开设备之前,应在BIOS中停用内部电池。松开七颗十字螺丝后,机箱托盘和它的夹子可以用铲子相对容易地取出。之后,你可以看到已安装的M.2 2242固态硬盘、一个内存插槽(已占用)、WLAN插槽以及一个用于较长M.2 2280固态硬盘的额外插槽。57Wh的电池只用螺丝固定,风扇可以清洗。
担保
在美国,联想提供12个月的现场支持保修,可以升级到2年、3年、4年或5年,附加费用也相应提高。更多的综合保修服务可以通过Premier Onsite Support 和Premier Support Plus的形式提供,也有1到5年的计划,价格也在增加。总的来说,附加费用从最低的+25.00美元(Premier Onsite Support,1年)到最高的+381.85美元(Premier Support Plus,5年)。详细的概述可以在这里看到https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/pb/index.html?mainCode=21EB0022US&guid=7b27957b-19f0-40d8-8ebd-79baabc42774#step=1.
当然,这些价格在其他国家可能有所不同,所以有兴趣的买家应在购买前仔细检查。
输入设备:在ThinkPad E14上有1.8毫米的行程,仍然很好。
键盘
如果你正在寻找紧凑型商务笔记本电脑中的最佳键盘,你很难避免联想ThinkPad E14。所有较新的ThinkPad的键程为1.5毫米,而E14 G4的键程为1.8毫米,这使得许多用户的打字体验更加愉快,反馈更加丰富。
全宽的6排键盘,其凹陷的16 x 16毫米的按键是防溢出的,所有重要的按键都是专用的。两段式背光键盘在有针对性的压力下根本不会屈服。如果你直接从联想订购,你必须单独选择背光。
触摸板和TrackPoint
10 x 5.6厘米的触摸板比其他一些ThinkPads上的触摸板要小一点。然而,它的Mylar表面提供了一个平滑的滑行体验,但感觉不像玻璃。触摸板。集成的点击按钮提供了丰富的反馈和中等行程。我们非常喜欢TrackPoint按键,特别是因为它们不是完全平坦的,与较新的ThinkPad上的按键相比。
显示:足够的亮度,可选择100%的sRGB
我们的测试设备使用标准的IPS显示屏,分辨率为全高清(1920x1080),指定亮度为300cd/m²。该面板的名称与直接的前辈甚至还更亮一些,测量值为330cd/m²。
此外,ThinkPad E14还提供了一个100% sRGB的显示选项,用于在sRGB范围内进行更强烈的色彩和媒体编辑。另一方面,不推荐提供的TN选项:
1.920x1.080,TN,250 cd/m²,16:9,500:1,45% NTSC
1.920x1.080,IPS,300 cd/m²,16:9,800:1,45% NTSC
1.920x1.080,IPS,300 cd/m²,16:9,1200:1,100% sRGB
实测对比度为1,035:1,略高于平均水平,而主观的画面印象也是平均到良好。响应时间不算太慢,所以重影现象几乎不明显。也没有发现PWM闪烁。然而,黑暗背景上的清晰光晕有时会让人有点烦躁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 352 cd/m²
Contrast: 1035:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
41.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE NV140FHM-N4V, IPS-LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE NVM140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA AUO559C, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN AU Optronics AUO7490, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W AUO5491 / B140HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE LENOVO LEN140FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | -8% | 64% | -11% | 5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.6 | 40.3 -1% | 37 -9% | 67 65% | 36 -11% | 42.2 4% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.4 | 59.5 0% | 55.5 -7% | 98.3 65% | 54 -9% | 62.9 6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.9 | 41.7 0% | 38.2 -9% | 68.3 63% | 37 -12% | 43.6 4% |
Response Times | -21% | -18% | 8% | -43% | -5% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.1 ? | 35.2 ? -35% | 42 ? -61% | 30 ? -15% | 41 ? -57% | 29 ? -11% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.3 ? | 21.6 ? -6% | 15 ? 26% | 14 ? 31% | 26 ? -28% | 20 ? 1% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -1% | -93% | 35% | -7% | -41% | |
Brightness middle | 352 | 341 -3% | 255 -28% | 404 15% | 290 -18% | 306 -13% |
Brightness | 330 | 327 -1% | 233 -29% | 377 14% | 282 -15% | 283 -14% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 90 1% | 86 -3% | 79 -11% | 81 -9% | 85 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.26 24% | 0.25 26% | 0.26 24% | 0.38 -12% | |
Contrast | 1035 | 1312 27% | 1616 56% | 1115 8% | 805 -22% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 5.1 -4% | 8.41 -72% | 1.47 70% | 4.65 5% | 6 -22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.8 | 17.6 -5% | 13.51 20% | 2.6 85% | 7.5 55% | 20.5 -22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.6 | 4.4 4% | 0.84 82% | 3.98 13% | 4.5 2% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 2.1 -50% | 7.6 -443% | 1.7 -21% | 3.22 -130% | 5.1 -264% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.11 104% | 3.12 71% | 2.35 94% | 2.54 87% | 2.13 103% |
CCT | 6665 98% | 6755 96% | 6233 104% | 6662 98% | 6169 105% | 6264 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
-4% | -40% /
-56% | 36% /
38% | -20% /
-13% | -14% /
-26% |
* ... smaller is better
由于sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率仅有不到60%,需要精确色彩的图像编辑是不可能的。在这种情况下,你必须选择ThinkPad E14的100% sRGB选项,只要你能找到上市的这种型号。
灰度等级在出厂前就已经很准确了,但在颜色方面情况就不同了,即使经过校准,几乎所有的颜色都与目标值<3有很大的偏差。至少没有发现偏色。我们用X-Rite i1Pro 2校准的色彩配置文件可以在这里下载https://notebookcheck.com/uploads/tx_nbc2/LEN40A9_02.icm.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 9.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.9 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
额外的亮度与哑光面板相结合,对户外使用很有帮助,但仍建议在阴凉处使用。
性能:尽管Barcelo U,ThinkPad E14提供了很多。
我们评测的是ThinkPad E14第四代,配备八核心的AMD Ryzen 7 5825U、它与六核Ryzen 5 5625U一起提供。 Ryzen 5 5625U和四核 Ryzen 3 5425UCPU。这款 RX Vega 8被用作图形单元。由于底层的Zen 2架构,RDNA 2 GPU和USB 4必须被省略。
16GB DDR4-3200内存(8GB焊接+8GB插槽)可以扩展到40GB,尽管16GB仍将继续以双通道模式运行。在我们的SKU上,512GB PCIe 3.0固态硬盘采用较短的M.2 2242格式。
总的来说,所提供的性能对于纯粹的办公电脑来说是过剩的,所以多媒体使用,如FHD视频编辑或音乐制作,是一个明显的可能性,但这里应该选择100%sRGB的面板。英特尔机型最高配备酷睿i7 1260P和Thunderbolt 4的英特尔型号也是可用的。
测试条件
联想并没有在其ThinkPad笔记本电脑上提供自己的性能配置程序。相反,这些程序被内置到Windows的电源设置中。有三个配置文件影响性能、电池寿命和排放:
- 最佳节能:11W
- 平衡:25W(PL2) > 20W
- 最佳性能:30W
我们在最佳性能 模式下进行了所有的性能测试,但WiFi和视频电池寿命除外,它们是在平衡 模式下测量的。
处理器
AMDRyzen 7 5825U 有8个核心,16个线程,属于Barcelo U刷新,因此仍然基于Zen 2架构。与Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U 相比,ThinkPad T14 G3 的多核性能较高,如下面的Cinebench R15图表所示,令人高兴。这主要是由于ThinkPad E14的TDP较高,为31W,而T14则从30W迅速降至25W。E14 G4的性能在电池模式下也保持稳定。
竞争对手也明显被打败了,包括上一代产品,代表作是 ThinkPad E15 G3为代表,配备了八核 Ryzen 7 5700U,在我们的总体评级中,它的表现整整超过了18%。然而,在单核性能方面,惠普ProBook 440 G9的单核性能超过了上一代产品。 惠普ProBook 440 G9显著更快,这要归功于其英特尔CPU 酷睿i7 1255U.
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (9339 - 10904, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Average of class Office (1056 - 15743, n=123, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Average of class Office (529 - 1995, n=122, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (1433 - 1460, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (3645 - 4180, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Average of class Office (356 - 5904, n=121, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Average of class Office (181.3 - 764, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (547 - 567, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (1575 - 1860, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Average of class Office (160.8 - 2642, n=121, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (228 - 232, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Average of class Office (82.6 - 284, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Average of class Office (214 - 2844, n=122, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (281 - 322, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (42883 - 49511, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average of class Office (4226 - 62349, n=122, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (5208 - 5468, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average of class Office (2233 - 6687, n=122, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=123, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (5827 - 7367, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1974, n=123, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (1438 - 1496, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (11.1 - 13.4, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Average of class Office (1.55 - 17.4, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (52.8 - 66.6, n=4) | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 117.5, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.397, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (0.515 - 0.536, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Average of class Office | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (10886 - 12710, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (10550 - 11551, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (5758 - 6675, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 48177, n=121, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (9627 - 19826, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
系统性能
AMD系统在各方面的反应都很灵敏。在4K YouTube播放过程中进行网上冲浪(不掉帧)是绝对没有问题的。高系统性能也反映在PCMark 10基准测试中,ThinkPad E14 Gen4 AMD在我们的比较领域中处于领先地位。在网页浏览性能方面也出现了类似的情况,例如在Mozilla Kraken 1.1中。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Speedometer 2.0: Result
Octane V2: Total Score
Jetstream 2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE |
Octane V2 / Total Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5935 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 88119, n=122, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (21188 - 42917, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 87297, n=122, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (24018 - 39413, n=4) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 94965, n=122, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (23602 - 41720, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (85.9 - 105.9, n=4) | |
Average of class Office (44.3 - 188.3, n=123, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE | |
HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
美光公司的512GB PCIe 3.0固态硬盘采用较短的M.2 2242格式,与SK海力士的上一个型号相比,并不逊色。此外,在我们的调查中,美光的固态硬盘比竞争对手的速度快。此外,美光的固态硬盘在我们的比较领域中比竞争对手快。与之相比 惠普ProBook 440 G9和 戴尔Latitude 14 5420,在长时间的读取过程中,性能保持稳定。
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N | HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 21% | -25% | -15% | -35% | -12% | |
Seq Read | 2698 | 2596 -4% | 2339 -13% | 1405 -48% | 1934 -28% | 2682.84 -1% |
Seq Write | 1490 | 1460 -2% | 837 -44% | 1011 -32% | 646 -57% | 1691.36 14% |
4K Read | 40.8 | 48.62 19% | 35.85 -12% | 53.7 32% | 44.07 8% | 44.29 9% |
4K Write | 126 | 113.4 -10% | 124.4 -1% | 122.7 -3% | 138.9 10% | 129.18 3% |
4K-64 Read | 874 | 1419 62% | 485.8 -44% | 803 -8% | 447 -49% | 994.27 14% |
4K-64 Write | 1970 | 1840 -7% | 1070 -46% | 810 -59% | 216 -89% | 945.62 -52% |
Access Time Read * | 0.087 | 0.049 44% | 0.152 -75% | 0.138 -59% | 0.183 -110% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.135 | 0.032 76% | 0.03 78% | 0.032 76% | 0.049 64% | 0.089 34% |
Score Read | 1184 | 1727 46% | 756 -36% | 997 -16% | 685 -42% | 1307 10% |
Score Write | 2245 | 2099 -7% | 1279 -43% | 1034 -54% | 420 -81% | 1244 -45% |
Score Total | 3981 | 4658 17% | 2355 -41% | 2536 -36% | 1406 -65% | 3177 -20% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1941 | 1168 -40% | 1762.9 -9% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 337 | 590 75% | 310.03 -8% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 921 | 1148 25% | 856.99 -7% | |||
DiskSpd | 23% | -19% | -23% | -26% | -1% | |
seq read | 1970 | 1687 -14% | 1509 -23% | 1139 -42% | 1646 -16% | 1989 1% |
seq write | 2118 | 2188 3% | 1229 -42% | 1073 -49% | 968 -54% | 1597 -25% |
seq q8 t1 read | 2962 | 3346 13% | 3049 3% | 2315 -22% | 2479 -16% | 2618 -12% |
seq q8 t1 write | 2266 | 2387 5% | 1620 -29% | 1079 -52% | 970 -57% | 1591 -30% |
4k q1 t1 read | 38.8 | 53.2 37% | 55 42% | 54.4 40% | 38.7 0% | 47.3 22% |
4k q1 t1 write | 126.7 | 126 -1% | 117.8 -7% | 85.3 -33% | 151 19% | 135.2 7% |
4k q32 t16 read | 771 | 1733 125% | 635 -18% | 859 11% | 674 -13% | 1056 37% |
4k q32 t16 write | 1309 | 1471 12% | 346 -74% | 798 -39% | 425 -68% | 1168 -11% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 22% /
22% | -22% /
-22% | -19% /
-19% | -31% /
-31% | -7% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
iGPU AMDRadeon RX Vega 8大致上与 Radeon 660M和英特尔的 Xe Graphics G7相比,而 Radeon 680M具有非常明显的优势。ThinkPad E14不是为游戏而设计的,但可以在原生FHD分辨率下以低到中等的细节玩老游戏。
3DMark 11 Performance | 5920 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22639 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3251 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1306 points | |
Help |
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10: GPU
Geekbench 5.5: OpenCL Score
Geekbench 6.0: GPU OpenCL
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Average of class Office (322 - 1215, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (477 - 1133, n=12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614P-52-724G | |
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
Average of class Office (343 - 3786, n=110, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (463 - 758, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE |
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 / GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (31 - 83, n=47) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average of class Office (5 - 83, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614P-52-724G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 |
Geekbench 5.5 / OpenCL Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Office (3059 - 46692, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614P-52-724G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (11298 - 19234, n=54) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES |
Geekbench 6.0 / GPU OpenCL | |
Average of class Office (3189 - 43795, n=20, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (13095 - 18093, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE | |
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 99.2 | 88.7 | 24.8 | 11 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 61.2 | 40.1 | 18.8 | 13.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 106.6 | 80.8 | 49.7 | 46.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 33.4 | 17.4 | 12 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 44.5 | 35.6 | 31.5 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 75.2 | 29.3 | 24.5 | 21 |
God of War (2022) | 15.5 | 11.9 | 10.5 |
排放:在ThinkPad E14 G4 AMD中,风扇基本无声。
噪声
ThinkPad E14 G4的风扇在闲置、浏览网页或执行办公任务时始终保持沉默。只有3D应用程序和CPU密集型任务才会使风扇活跃起来,尽管它的平均音量为34.5 dB(A),但不会太大,尤其是没有高频声音发出。
除了ProBook 440 G9 ,竞争对手在中高负荷下的风扇行为明显更响亮。在E14中没有检测到电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 22.9 / 22.9 / 22.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 30.3 / 37.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.9 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE Vega 8, R7 5825U, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N | HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE Vega 7, R5 5625U, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -12% | -7% | -16% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 22.9 | 23.8 -4% | 27 -18% | 25 -9% | 25 -9% | 24.41 -7% |
Idle Minimum * | 22.9 | 23.8 -4% | 27 -18% | 25 -9% | 25 -9% | 24.41 -7% |
Idle Average * | 22.9 | 23.8 -4% | 27 -18% | 25 -9% | 25 -9% | 24.41 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.9 | 25 -9% | 27 -18% | 25 -9% | 25 -9% | 24.41 -7% |
Load Average * | 30.3 | 32 -6% | 31.5 -4% | 34.7 -15% | 36.5 -20% | 36.36 -20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.5 | 32 7% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 37.5 | 34.5 8% | 34.9 7% | 34 9% | 52.4 -40% | 38.62 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
联想ThinkPad保持非常凉爽,在设备底部的中上部区域最高温度为44.5℃,比上一代产品低几度。竞争对手的设备也提供了类似的冷却结果,但Acer Swift 5 SF514尤其是积极地脱颖而出。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-6.1 °C / -10.9 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE AMD Ryzen 5 5625U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | 6% | 16% | 1% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38.8 | 45.1 -16% | 38.9 -0% | 34.5 11% | 41.7 -7% | 38.9 -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.5 | 49.3 -11% | 37.4 16% | 35.4 20% | 35.6 20% | 42.8 4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.1 | 24.7 12% | 26.7 5% | 23.8 15% | 29.9 -6% | 33.2 -18% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 25.6 12% | 27.8 4% | 24 17% | 29.7 -2% | 30.8 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在综合压力测试(Prime95 + FurMark)中,CPU保持在2.7GHz的基础时钟以上。有趣的是,CPU和GPU的时钟在大约30分钟后明显增加,GPU的时钟从1.1GHz增加到1.7GHz以上。
刚超过80℃的温度属于良好范围。在纯粹的GPU压力下,iGPU在一小时后保持2GHz的全时钟。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | 0,2 | 20 | 38 | 38 |
Prime95压力 | 2,9 | 35 | 80 | 81 |
Prime95+FurMark | 2,7 | 1.113 | 78 | 78 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 0,48 | 2.000 | 71 | 67 |
FurMark 应力 | 0.3 | 2.000 | 66 | 61 |
发言人
ThinkPad E14的2个2 W立体声扬声器有一丝低音,而高音是平衡的,中音是线性的,但仍然太安静,只有68 dB(A),以便能够真正享受音乐。
观看视频和视频通话是可能的,没有问题。对于其他一切,我们建议通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙外接耳机。
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:联想笔记本电脑的电池寿命稳固
消耗功率
闲置功耗为7W(最低4W),是令人愉快的低水平,而竞争对手有类似的比率,除了 Acer Swift 5有3.5瓦(最低2.4瓦)。ThinkPad E14第四代AMD最大需要58瓦,65瓦的电源可以轻松应对。它在1小时20分钟内将57Wh的电池充电到80%。
Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.7 Watt |
Idle | 4.1 / 7.1 / 8.1 Watt |
Load |
41.6 / 58.4 Watt |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE R7 5825U, Vega 8, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK, IPS-LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE R5 5625U, Vega 7, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 1% | -7% | 17% | 5% | 3% | -13% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 3.5 15% | 5.1 -24% | 2.4 41% | 3.4 17% | 4.1 -0% | 5.25 ? -28% | 4.3 ? -5% |
Idle Average * | 7.1 | 7.5 -6% | 7.4 -4% | 3.5 51% | 7.1 -0% | 8 -13% | 7.82 ? -10% | 7.34 ? -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.1 | 8.7 -7% | 8.4 -4% | 6.6 19% | 8.4 -4% | 8.9 -10% | 9.25 ? -14% | 9.13 ? -13% |
Load Average * | 41.6 | 43.6 -5% | 42.6 -2% | 47 -13% | 35.3 15% | 39.3 6% | 45.3 ? -9% | 41 ? 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.7 | 42.2 3% | 42.3 3% | 35.4 19% | 38.1 13% | |||
Load Maximum * | 58.4 | 55 6% | 64 -10% | 67.2 -15% | 67 -15% | 45.7 22% | 60.1 ? -3% | 58 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
,尽管反复测试,ThinkPad E14 G4 AMD的前辈 ,持续时间长了两个小时。不过,对于在设定的150cd/m²的条件下浏览网页来说,不到9个半小时的时间也不是一个坏结果。
这款 ProBook 440 G9在这项测试中甚至没有坚持6个小时,而采用英特尔CPU的两个竞争对手,即 Acer Swift 5和戴尔的 Latitude 14 5420,持续时间约为13小时。
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE R7 5825U, Vega 8, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, 57 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G9-5Y3Z3EA i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 42 Wh | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 56 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G4 21DK0004GE R5 5625U, Vega 7, 43.01 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | -39% | 24% | 50% | -19% | 13% | |
H.264 | 676 | 827 22% | 705 ? 4% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 562 | 680 21% | 344 -39% | 794 41% | 769 37% | 511 -9% | 592 ? 5% |
Load | 90 | 71 -21% | 96 7% | 146 62% | 65 -28% | 117.7 ? 31% |
Pros
Cons
对ThinkPad E14 AMD的评价:如果配置正确,是负担得起的全能型产品
一方面,联想ThinkPad E14 G4 AMD是一款优秀的移动工作设备,拥有出色的键盘,低排放,八核CPU带来的非常高的性能水平,可扩展的内存,RJ45和一个FHD网络摄像头。相当明亮的显示屏和坚固的外壳也是加分项。
然而,联想在第四代ThinkPad E系列中连续第三次使用相同的设计,这只会在未来一代中发生变化。一般来说,这个更新周期完全没有问题,并提供了良好的键盘的优势,但USB 2.0标准、相当沉重和笨重的外壳与16:9的显示屏,以及缺乏内部升级的可能性,对于本来是高质量和廉价的设备的14英寸商务笔记本来说,留下了一些苦涩的回味。
ThinkPad E14 G4 AMD提供了足够的马力,即使是简单的多媒体工作,特别是如果你能找到一个100% sRGB的型号。但对于办公室工作来说,不一定非要用Ryzen 7,这对价格有积极影响。
总而言之,我们可以轻松地推荐 直接的前辈只要你找到一个相应的更便宜的报价。一个有趣的选择是 戴尔Latitude 14 5420尽管它有一个糟糕的触摸板,而且明显较低的CPU性能仅限于纯粹的办公工作和网上冲浪。惠普ProBook 440 G9的显示屏 惠普ProBook 440 G9的显示屏太暗,而1公斤重的 Acer Swift 5 SF514有一个光亮的触摸屏,但如果你能适应键盘并愿意多花200美元左右,它是一个非常好的选择。
同样有趣的是 ThinkPad L14 G3 AMD它的价格略高,基本上提供了相同的功能,但提供了更长的电池寿命,长达4小时。然而,它的扁平TrackPoint键只提供1.5毫米的键程。它还有点厚,但有两个内存插槽和一个400 cd/m²的明亮的低功耗显示器选项。
价格和可用性
在其美国网店,联想目前正在以大幅折扣的价格提供ThinkPad E14 G4 AMD的一些有趣配置。这些配置是
- AMD Ryzen 3 5425U (2.70 GHz up to 4.10 GHz), 8 GB DDR4-3200MHz, 256 GB SSD M.2 2242,价格为529.80美元(40%折扣)。
- AMD Ryzen 5 5625U (2.30 GHz up to 4.30 GHz), 8 GB DDR4-3200MHz, 512 GB SSD M.2 2242, 售价$827.40 (40%折扣)
- AMD Ryzen 5 5625U (2.30 GHz up to 4.30 GHz), 16 GB DDR4-3200MHz, 512 GB SSD M.2 2242, 售价881.40美元 (40%折扣)
- AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (2.00 GHz up to 4.50 GHz), 16 GB DDR4-3200MHz, 1 TB SSD M.2 2280, 售价773.00美元 (58%折扣)
- AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (2.00 GHz up to 4.50 GHz), 40 GB DDR4-3200MHz, 1 TB SSD M.2 2280, 售价1313.40美元 (40%折扣)
价格截止到10.06.23,可能会有变化。
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE
-
06/05/2023 v7
Marvin Gollor
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.