Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel Ultra 9 275HX

英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 是一款基于箭湖架构的移动高端 CPU，适用于游戏笔记本电脑。它提供 24 个内核，包括 8 个主频高达 5.4 GHz 的高性能内核和 16 个主频高达 4.6 GHz 的高效能内核。CPU 可访问 40 MB 二级缓存和 36 MB 三级缓存，TDP 为 55 瓦。

SoC 集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU，具有 13 个 TOPS (Int8)，可选择支持 vPro Essentials。集成内存控制器最高支持 192 GB DDR5-6400（双通道，可选 ECC）。集成图形处理器（iGPU）是一块小型英特尔图形显卡，具有四个 Xe 内核，运行频率为 300 - 1900 MHz。

性能 - 高端

由于 P 核心的提升时钟频率低了 100 MHz，因此 Ultra 9 275HX 的性能仅略低于顶级型号 Core Ultra 9 285HX。 酷睿至尊 9 285HX因此仍低于同类 台式机酷睿至尊 9 285K(主频高达 5.7 GHz，TDP 为 125 瓦）。由于内核（尤其是高效内核）的 IPC 有所改进，该 CPU 的性能应略低于或达到以下水平 猛禽湖酷睿 i9-14900HX(8 + 16 核，最高 5.8 / 4.1 GHz）的水平。这使得该 CPU 非常适合于高端游戏和内容创建等要求苛刻的任务。

生产--台积电和 Foveros

Arrow Lake-HX 芯片基于桌面级 Arrow Lake-S 芯片，由多个芯片组组成。CPU 部分由台积电采用现代 N3B（3 纳米）工艺制造，GPU 也由台积电采用 N5P 工艺制造。SoC 和 I/O 芯片采用台积电 N6 工艺制造。底层芯片由英特尔公司采用 22 纳米工艺制造，并通过 Fovero 的 3D 封装实现了单个芯片的封装。

CodenameArrow Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Arrow Lake

Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-HX

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX « 2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Clock Rate2100 - 5400 MHz
Level 2 Cache40 MB
Level 3 Cache36 MB
Number of Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
GPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (300 - 1900 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT8
Chip AI36 TOPS INT8
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
48.5 pt (81%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 -6%
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
45.5 -6%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46 -5%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.6 -4%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
46.7 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
46.8 -4%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
46.9 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
48 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
48.5
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
49.5 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50.1 3%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 24%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.1     avg: 134     median: 134.7 (67%)     max: 138.2 Points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1547     avg: 2023     median: 2049 (38%)     max: 2288 Points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30712     avg: 35882     median: 35959 (33%)     max: 40970 Points
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -99%
...
Intel Core i9-13950HX
29352 -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
29400 -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
29833 -17%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30428 -15%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
31386 -13%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 -9%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
33078 -8%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
34856 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
35061 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
35882
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
37189 4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
38155 6%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
39065 9%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 200%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2009     avg: 2190     median: 2194.5 (89%)     max: 2267 Points
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -97%
...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2061 -6%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -6%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2106 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2128 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2138 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2150 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2190
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2202 1%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2209 1%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2213 1%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 4%
max:
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
2459 12%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 774     avg: 845     median: 853 (93%)     max: 870 Points
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 12026     avg: 14054     median: 14183 (35%)     max: 16108 Points
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4756     avg: 5589     median: 5668 (36%)     max: 6271 Points
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -99%
...
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4437 -21%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4521 -19%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4565 -18%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4724 -15%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
4754 -15%
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
4851 -13%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
5247 -6%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5363 -4%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
5371 -4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5589
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
5734 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
5933 6%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
6043 8%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 183%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
03156309451260157518902205252028353150346537804095441047255040535556705985Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 306     avg: 331.3     median: 334 (93%)     max: 343 Points
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
306 -8%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
307 -7%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
308 -7%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
310.3 -6%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 -6%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
316.4 -4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
320.3 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
326 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
327 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
331.3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
334.1 1%
...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
326 -2%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
357.8 8%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
67.9 Points (88%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
4 Points (95%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12237 points (74%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
94497 points (68%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
88529 Points (57%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14731 Points (18%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
45.1 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10119 points (16%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 98236     avg: 113381     median: 112452 (65%)     max: 124155 MIPS
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6026     avg: 6695     median: 6687 (79%)     max: 7149 MIPS
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
259 fps (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
395.5 fps (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.7     avg: 38     median: 38.6 (68%)     max: 43.8 fps
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 134     avg: 153.7     median: 151 (2%)     max: 190 Seconds
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 82     avg: 95.1     median: 94 (1%)     max: 116 Seconds
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3943     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4568 sec
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20771     avg: 21014     median: 20860 (44%)     max: 21412 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.4 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 118679     avg: 122525     median: 122974 (94%)     max: 125471 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21109     avg: 26467     median: 26595.5 (65%)     max: 29050 Points
+ 30 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104288     avg: 109602     median: 109523 (89%)     max: 115412 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 107788     avg: 110909     median: 109856 (89%)     max: 116134 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 111394     avg: 114497     median: 113780 (91%)     max: 119034 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 22080     avg: 26083     median: 25886 (65%)     max: 29274 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 37357     avg: 46945     median: 47850 (85%)     max: 53870 Points
+ 33 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13789     avg: 16117     median: 16277 (69%)     max: 17607 Points
+ 31 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2843     avg: 3033     median: 3057 (71%)     max: 3160 points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 16033     avg: 19376     median: 19464 (76%)     max: 21668 points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-9120C
533 -97%
...
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
17242 -11%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17401 -10%
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
17557 -9%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
17564 -9%
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
17576 -9%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
17794 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
18113 -7%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
18689 -4%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
19000 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19376
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
20200 4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100
20320 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
20477 6%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
20487 6%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
21254 10%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22527 16%
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
23384 21%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100
23491 21%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
25760 33%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2691     avg: 2796     median: 2796 (89%)     max: 2901 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 17227     avg: 18101     median: 18101 (74%)     max: 18975 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2033     avg: 2200     median: 2224 (75%)     max: 2292 points
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19105     avg: 22869     median: 22642 (41%)     max: 25855 points
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2058     avg: 2118     median: 2117.5 (9%)     max: 2177 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21162     avg: 22375     median: 22374.5 (71%)     max: 23587 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8615     avg: 8894     median: 8894 (89%)     max: 9173 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 80186     avg: 84364     median: 84363.5 (83%)     max: 88541 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 402     avg: 414.5     median: 411.5 (0%)     max: 432 ms
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 123370     avg: 127054     median: 127124 (84%)     max: 130140 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 285     avg: 325.4     median: 330 (86%)     max: 341 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 306     avg: 351.5     median: 346.5 (62%)     max: 532 Points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1857     avg: 2161     median: 2175 (81%)     max: 2339 Points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 93.9     avg: 195.7     median: 195.7 (34%)     max: 270 Watt
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 153.1     avg: 219.5     median: 228 (42%)     max: 259 Watt
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.3     avg: 31     median: 27.2 (18%)     max: 79.9 Watt
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 10.1     avg: 22.8     median: 22.2 (16%)     max: 38.4 Watt
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.4     avg: 26.1     median: 24.3 (18%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.35
log 15. 08:14:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 14 Dec 2025 13:29:07 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.013s ... 0.014s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 18886 +0.022s ... 0.038s

#12 got single benchmarks 18886 +0.139s ... 0.178s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.178s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +1.568s ... 1.745s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.746s

#16 return log +0s ... 1.746s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor

微星Crosshair 16 HX AI评测

微星 Crosshair 16 HX AI 笔记本电脑评测：性能稳定，但也有不足之处，但不会影响核心游戏体验

微星 Crosshair 16 HX AI 的目标是以酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的组合取悦中高端游戏人群，它在大多数情况下都能做到这一点。Crosshair 16 HX AI 可以很好地处理 1440p 游戏，甚至是内容创作，但为了控制价格，它也做出了一些明显的妥协。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.5 kg
华硕 ROG NUC 15

2025 年最佳迷你游戏 PC：华硕 ROG NUC 15（配备GeForce RTX 5080 和 Core Ultra 9）评测

华硕 ROG NUC 15 是一款小巧的游戏利器，其目标用户显然是游戏玩家。它配备了英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑 GPU，可在最小的空间内实现强大的性能。我们当前的评测详细展示了这款迷你 PC 的实际性能。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 3 kg
微星 Stealth 18 HX AI 笔记本电脑评测：迄今最便携的 18 英寸游戏本

微星 Stealth 18 HX AI 笔记本电脑评测：迄今最便携的 18 英寸游戏本

Stealth 18 几乎囊括了我们对 Titan 18 的所有喜爱，包括 Core Ultra 9 处理器、GeForce RTX 5090 显卡和 4K UHD 迷你 LED 显示屏，但外形尺寸却小得多。不过，噪音水平和温度肯定需要改进。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 3 kg
配备 RTX 5090 的联想Legion 9 18 评测

配备 RTX 5090 的联想Legion 9 18 评测：市场上最强大的游戏笔记本电脑

联想凭借Legion 9 18 毫不费力地征服了 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑领域。在最近测试了 RTX 5080 版本之后，我们现在来看看基于 RTX 5090 的顶级型号。竞争是否会再次升温？...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.5 kg
Aorus RTX 5090 AI Box

笔记本电脑电源提升：技嘉 Aorus RTX 5090 AI Box - 通过雷电 5 外接 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 GPU 评测

通过 AORUS RTX 5090 AI Box，技嘉推出了基于目前最快消费级显卡的外置 GPU 解决方案。这样就可以在笔记本电脑或迷你 PC 上轻松使用 RTX 5090 的强大性能。不过，也有一些限制需要考虑。在本评测中，我们将仔细分析这些限制以及实际可能达到的性能。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00"

Aorus RTX 5090 AI Box:
  Review » 笔记本电脑电源提升：技嘉 Aorus RTX 5090 AI Box - 通过雷电 5 外接 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 GPU 评测

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  Review » Legion 9 18IAX10 评测：联想首款 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑几乎是全垒打

MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 18.00", 3.1 kg
  Review » 微星Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW评测：大屏而不贵

Schenker Key 18 Pro M25 RTX 5090: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 4.1 kg
  Review » 申克 Key 18 Pro E25 评测：配备 RTX 5090 和 256 GB 内存的高端工作站

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » Alienware 16X Aurora 评测：兼顾高端制造与中端 GPU

Aorus Elite 16 AE6H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » Aorus Elite 16 评论：高端 RTX 5070 游戏笔记本电脑值得购买吗？

MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWIG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 17.00", 3 kg
  Review » 最后一款 17 英寸 Blackwell Mohican：微星 Vector 17 HX AI 游戏笔记本评测

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  Review » 速度极快但相对安静的游戏玩家 - Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

Acer Predator Helios 18 AI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  Review » 宏碁掠夺者 Helios 18 AI 评测：终于有了更安静的游戏笔记本电脑，但代价是什么？

Alienware 18 Area-51: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 4.2 kg
  Review » Alienware 18 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测：性能至上

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » 迄今最强大的 RTX 5070 Ti 玩家 - 联想Legion Pro 5 16IAX10H OLED 评测

Alienware 16 Area-51: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » Alienware 16 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测：戴尔迄今为止最好的旗舰游戏笔记本电脑

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » 搭载 RTX 5090 和 240 Hz OLED，与 ROG、Legion 等公司竞争 - 技嘉 Aorus Master 16 游戏笔记本评测

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 笔记本电脑评测：配备可选水冷系统的 RTX 5090 游戏本

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 笔记本电脑评测：RTX 5080 在游戏巨头中表现如何？

Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » 得益于 300 Hz mini LED，最快的游戏笔记本电脑现在更出色了 - XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和游戏笔记本电脑中的迷你 LED - 华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 16 2025 评测

Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25): NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑和高达 128 GB 内存的游戏/工作站混合型笔记本电脑 - XMG Pro 16 (E25) 笔记本电脑评测

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » 惠普 Omen Max 16 笔记本电脑评测：速度超快，但温度有点高

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  Review » Aorus Master 18 游戏笔记本电脑评测：RTX 5090 带来的代价

Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25) Engineering Sample: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
  Review » 仅有 12 GB VRAM 的高端产品？ - NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑评测

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » RTX 5080 笔记本电脑是 WQHD 游戏的最佳选择 - 华硕 ROG Strix G16 G615 评测

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » 联想Legion Pro 7i 16 代 10 笔记本电脑评测：几乎无损的 400 W 电源

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 分析：最快游戏 CPU 之争

  Review » 配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测

Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro 2026: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro 2026

MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 17.00", 3 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWJG

HP Omen Max 16-ah0000: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16-ah0000

Aorus Elite 16 AE6H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Aorus Elite 16 AE6H

Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX10: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX10

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LW

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10

Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LR

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWJG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWJG

Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5070 Ti

Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LP: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LP

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10, RTX 5080: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10, RTX 5080

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070

Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LW

Alienware 16 Area-51: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Area-51

Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73

Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73, RTX 5080: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73, RTX 5080

MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR

MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWIG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 17.00", 3 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWIG

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5080: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5080

Alienware 18 Area-51, RTX 5080: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 4.3 kg
  External Review » Alienware 18 Area-51, RTX 5080

Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LM: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LM

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LR

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG, Ultra 9 275HX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG, Ultra 9 275HX

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWIG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 17.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWIG

Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5080: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5080

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H, RTX 5090: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H, RTX 5090

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635LW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635LW

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16 ah000

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LW

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWIG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWIG

Aorus Master 16 AM6H, RTX 5080 (BYH): NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Aorus Master 16 AM6H, RTX 5080 (BYH)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025

Alienware 18 Area-51: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 4.2 kg
  External Review » Alienware 18 Area-51

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Aorus Master 18 AM8H

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71

Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72

HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng

Asus ROG NUC 15-90AS00I1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 3 kg
   » 华硕 ROG NUC 15 在评测中给人留下深刻印象，在迷你游戏电脑中独占鳌头 - 英特尔-英伟达双核处理器带来高端性能

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3 kg
   » 微星Stealth 18 HX的超大音量Cooler Boost模式在大多数游戏场景中并无必要

   » MSI Stealth 18 HX 或 Razer Blade 18：更薄、更轻不一定更好

   » 微星Stealth 18 HX 280 W交流适配器的温度接近70摄氏度，是我们见过的最热的适配器之一

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » 少花钱多办事：在联想Legion Pro 中，使用 Ultra 7 而不是 Ultra 9 究竟会损失多少性能？

Aorus RTX 5090 AI Box:
   » 技嘉扩大 Aorus RTX 5090 Thunderbolt 5 eGPU 的供货范围

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.5 kg
   » 被低估的联想Legion 9 18 比雷蛇、微星等公司的笔记本电脑有更多升级选项

   » 如果设置为平衡模式，联想Legion 9 18 性能下降 20% 以上

Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » XMG 的 NEO 16 和 PRO 16 终究无法获得 G-Sync 和高级 Optimus 支持

MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 18.00", 3.1 kg
   » 微星Crosshair 18 HX省略了这一本可使其更具吸引力的功能

   » 微星 Crosshair 18 AX 是最经济实惠的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑之一，配备 Core Ultra 9 275HX

Schenker Key 18 Pro M25 RTX 5090: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 4.1 kg
   » 全球国际货运的移动工作站 Key 18 Pro 提供高端功能和出色的维护选项

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » Alienware 16X Aurora 上的 "大声超速 "模式不值得在性能上稍有提升

   » 戴尔 Alienware 16X 极光是一款面向大众的精简版 Area-51 游戏笔记本电脑

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.2 kg
   » 你真的需要 440 Hz 吗？为什么 Razer Blade 18 的新双模显示屏对许多用户来说是一种降级？

   » Razer 新款 Blade 18 比 Alienware 18 轻 1 千克，但速度一样快，甚至更安静一些

Alienware 18 Area-51: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 4.2 kg
   » 与微星 Titan 18 HX 相比，Alienware 18 Area-51 少了一项关键功能

   » Alienware 18 Area-51 的性能几乎超过了所有其他游戏笔记本电脑，我们有基准测试来证明这一点

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » 联想Legion Pro 5i 16 与Legion Pro 7i 16：我们对两者进行了评测

Alienware 16 Area-51: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 3.3 kg
   » 尺寸依然重要：Alienware 16 Area-51 RTX 5080 性能超越 Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090

   » Alienware 16 Area-51 将其最快的 175 W TGP 图形模式锁定在最响亮的风扇设置后面

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » RTX 5090 笔记本电脑对比：技嘉 Aorus Master 16 排名如何？

Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » XMG Neo 16 E25：仍是最佳游戏笔记本电脑之一，但缺乏高级 Optimus/G-Sync 功能

Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25): NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » 用 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的钱购买 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑的性能 - 在我们的评测中，配备全新 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑的 XMG Pro 16 显示出强劲性能

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Strix G16 2025 评测结论：不错的 RTX 5080 游戏笔记本电脑，但更快的 Ryzen 9 9955HX 仅支持 RTX 5070 Ti

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
   » 搭载 RTX 5090、迷你 LED 屏幕和雷电 5 的华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) 现已接受预订

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Arrow Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285
   24x 1.9 GHz - 5.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
   20x 3.3 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
   20x 3.3 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245
   14x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235
   14x 3.4 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
   14x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
   14x 4.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
   12x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
   12x 3.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235U
   12x 2.4 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225U
   12x 2.4 GHz - 4.8 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
   1.7 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
   16x
- AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
   16x 2.3 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-10)