Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel Ultra 9 275HX

英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 是一款基于箭湖架构的移动高端 CPU，适用于游戏笔记本电脑。它提供 24 个内核，包括 8 个主频高达 5.4 GHz 的高性能内核和 16 个主频高达 4.6 GHz 的高效能内核。CPU 可访问 40 MB 二级缓存和 36 MB 三级缓存，TDP 为 55 瓦。

SoC 集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU，具有 13 个 TOPS (Int8)，可选择支持 vPro Essentials。集成内存控制器最高支持 192 GB DDR5-6400（双通道，可选 ECC）。集成图形处理器（iGPU）是一块小型英特尔图形显卡，具有四个 Xe 内核，运行频率为 300 - 1900 MHz。

性能 - 高端

由于 P 核心的提升时钟频率低了 100 MHz，因此 Ultra 9 275HX 的性能仅略低于顶级型号 Core Ultra 9 285HX。 酷睿至尊 9 285HX因此仍低于同类 台式机酷睿至尊 9 285K(主频高达 5.7 GHz，TDP 为 125 瓦）。由于内核（尤其是高效内核）的 IPC 有所改进，该 CPU 的性能应略低于或达到以下水平 猛禽湖酷睿 i9-14900HX(8 + 16 核，最高 5.8 / 4.1 GHz）的水平。这使得该 CPU 非常适合于高端游戏和内容创建等要求苛刻的任务。

生产--台积电和 Foveros

Arrow Lake-HX 芯片基于桌面级 Arrow Lake-S 芯片，由多个芯片组组成。CPU 部分由台积电采用现代 N3B（3 纳米）工艺制造，GPU 也由台积电采用 N5P 工艺制造。SoC 和 I/O 芯片采用台积电 N6 工艺制造。底层芯片由英特尔公司采用 22 纳米工艺制造，并通过 Fovero 的 3D 封装实现了单个芯片的封装。

CodenameArrow Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Arrow Lake

Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-HX

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX « 2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Clock Rate2100 - 5400 MHz
Level 2 Cache40 MB
Level 3 Cache36 MB
Number of Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
GPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (300 - 1900 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
48.5 pt (81%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44.9 -7%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.1 -7%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 -6%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
45.7 -6%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
46 -5%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.6 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
46.8 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
48.5
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
49.1 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
49.5 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50 3%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 24%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.1     avg: 134.1     median: 134.7 (76%)     max: 138.2 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1547     avg: 2033     median: 2168 (40%)     max: 2288 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30712     avg: 35813     median: 36383 (34%)     max: 40970 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -99%
...
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28872 -19%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
29063 -19%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
29352 -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
29400 -18%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
29464 -18%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30428 -15%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
33078 -8%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
35061 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
35813
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
38701 8%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
39065 9%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
40117 12%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 201%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2009     avg: 2192     median: 2194.5 (92%)     max: 2267 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -97%
...
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -6%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2090 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2095 -4%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2139 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2145 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2185 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2192
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2202 0%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2209 1%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2213 1%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 4%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2359 8%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 774     avg: 843     median: 848.5 (92%)     max: 870 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 12026     avg: 14027     median: 14245 (35%)     max: 16108 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4756     avg: 5618     median: 5730 (36%)     max: 6271 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -99%
...
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4437 -21%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
4455 -21%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4522 -20%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4565 -19%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4724 -16%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
4830 -14%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
5247 -7%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5363 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5618
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
5985 7%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
6043 8%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
6232 11%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 182%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
03156309451260157518902205252028353150346537804095441047255040535556705985Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 306     avg: 331.6     median: 335 (93%)     max: 343 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
306 -8%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
306.9 -7%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
307 -7%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 -6%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
314 -5%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
317 -4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
324 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
324.5 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
327 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
331.6
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
332.5 0%
...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
324 -2%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
357.8 8%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 98236     avg: 114488     median: 117732 (68%)     max: 124155 MIPS
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6063     avg: 6734     median: 6678 (79%)     max: 7149 MIPS
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.7     avg: 38.2     median: 39.3 (69%)     max: 43.8 fps
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 134     avg: 155.2     median: 149 (2%)     max: 190 Seconds
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 82     avg: 95.5     median: 92.5 (1%)     max: 116 Seconds
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3943     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4568 sec
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
123908 Points (95%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21109     avg: 26491     median: 26532 (65%)     max: 29050 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104288     avg: 107108     median: 107108 (87%)     max: 109928 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 22080     avg: 26103     median: 26517 (67%)     max: 29274 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 37357     avg: 46376     median: 47850 (85%)     max: 53054 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13789     avg: 16166     median: 16306 (69%)     max: 17607 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2886     avg: 3054     median: 3057 (76%)     max: 3160 points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 16033     avg: 19546     median: 19535 (76%)     max: 21668 points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-9120C
533 -97%
...
Intel Core i7-13850HX
16782 -14%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
16828 -14%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
16957 -13%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
17305 -11%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17401 -11%
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
17557 -10%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
17564 -10%
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
17576 -10%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
18544 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19546
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
20200 3%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
20487 5%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
21254 9%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
21269 9%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
22104 13%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22527 15%
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
23384 20%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
25760 32%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2033     avg: 2207     median: 2225 (87%)     max: 2292 points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19105     avg: 23094     median: 23051 (41%)     max: 25855 points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 402     avg: 412.5     median: 411 (0%)     max: 432 ms
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 124210     avg: 127668     median: 127952 (97%)     max: 130140 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 285     avg: 328.6     median: 333 (91%)     max: 341 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 306     avg: 353.9     median: 347 (62%)     max: 532 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1857     avg: 2164     median: 2193 (82%)     max: 2339 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 93.9     avg: 198.7     median: 213 (37%)     max: 270 Watt
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 153.1     avg: 229.9     median: 242 (44%)     max: 259 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.3     avg: 28.9     median: 27.2 (18%)     max: 46.3 Watt
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 10.1     avg: 22     median: 21.3 (24%)     max: 38.4 Watt
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.4     avg: 25.2     median: 24.1 (18%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33
log 30. 16:03:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:37:44 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.018s ... 0.02s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.001s ... 0.022s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.023s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 18886 +0.021s ... 0.044s

#12 got single benchmarks 18886 +0.064s ... 0.108s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.108s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.849s ... 0.957s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.957s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.957s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor

最后一款 17 英寸 Blackwell Mohican：微星 Vector 17 HX AI 游戏笔记本评测

最后一款 17 英寸 Blackwell Mohican：微星 Vector 17 HX AI 游戏笔记本评测

在微星 Vector 16 之后，我们还测试了配备 RTX 5080 的全新 Vector 17，这是最后几款配备 Blackwell GPU 的 17 英寸笔记本电脑之一，因为 16 英寸和 18 英寸机型意味着 17 英寸笔记本电脑现在几乎绝迹。我们测试了 Vector 17 存在的理由。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 17.00" | 3 kg
速度极快但相对安静的游戏玩家 - Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

速度极快但相对安静的游戏玩家 - Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

Razer 的新款 Blade 18 2025 配备了GeForce RTX 5090 移动 GPU 和支持高达 440 Hz 的双模显示屏，旨在提供最高的游戏性能。改进后的散热效果令人印象深刻，Blade 18 是游戏时较为安静的机型之一。然而，新的设计并没有真正击中要害。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.2 kg
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 18 AI 评测：终于有了更安静的游戏笔记本电脑，但代价是什么？

宏碁掠夺者 Helios 18 AI 评测：终于有了更安静的游戏笔记本电脑，但代价是什么？

凭借其酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑，这款 18 英寸游戏台式机替代品实际上属于高端游戏类别。那么，Helios 18 AI 比竞争对手好在哪里？...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.5 kg
Alienware 18 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测：性能至上

Alienware 18 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测：性能至上

重新设计的 Alienware 18 证明，不一定要最薄、最轻才性感。更厚的机身不仅能带来更高的性能，还能提供其他大多数游戏笔记本电脑所不具备的功能，包括 CherryMX 按键、多个 PCIe5 SSD 插槽以及更安静的游戏体验。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 4.2 kg
迄今最强大的 RTX 5070 Ti 玩家 - 联想Legion Pro 5 16IAX10H OLED 评测

迄今最强大的 RTX 5070 Ti 玩家 - 联想Legion Pro 5 16IAX10H OLED 评测

怎样才能让去年的一款杰出游戏笔记本电脑成为更好的新机型？保持优点，改进缺点！这正是联想在今年的Legion Pro 5 16 上所做的。我们的评测将揭示它是否完全成功。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 16.00" | 2.4 kg

Alienware 16 Area-51: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » Alienware 16 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测：戴尔迄今为止最好的旗舰游戏笔记本电脑

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » 搭载 RTX 5090 和 240 Hz OLED，与 ROG、Legion 等公司竞争 - 技嘉 Aorus Master 16 游戏笔记本评测

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 笔记本电脑评测：配备可选水冷系统的 RTX 5090 游戏本

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 笔记本电脑评测：RTX 5080 在游戏巨头中表现如何？

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » 得益于 300 Hz mini LED，最快的游戏笔记本电脑现在更出色了 - XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和游戏笔记本电脑中的迷你 LED - 华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 16 2025 评测

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25): Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑和高达 128 GB 内存的游戏/工作站混合型笔记本电脑 - XMG Pro 16 (E25) 笔记本电脑评测

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » 惠普 Omen Max 16 笔记本电脑评测：速度超快，但温度有点高

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  Review » Aorus Master 18 游戏笔记本电脑评测：RTX 5090 带来的代价

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Engineering Sample: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
  Review » 仅有 12 GB VRAM 的高端产品？ - NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑评测

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » RTX 5080 笔记本电脑是 WQHD 游戏的最佳选择 - 华硕 ROG Strix G16 G615 评测

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » 联想Legion Pro 7i 16 代 10 笔记本电脑评测：几乎无损的 400 W 电源

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 分析：最快游戏 CPU 之争

  Review » 配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWIG: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 17.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWIG

Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5080: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5080

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635LW: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635LW

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16 ah000

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LW: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LW

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWIG: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWIG

Aorus Master 16 AM6H, RTX 5080 (BYH): Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Aorus Master 16 AM6H, RTX 5080 (BYH)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025

Alienware 18 Area-51: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 4.2 kg
  External Review » Alienware 18 Area-51

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Aorus Master 18 AM8H

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H : Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71

Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72

HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.2 kg
   » 你真的需要 440 Hz 吗？为什么 Razer Blade 18 的新双模显示屏对许多用户来说是一种降级？

   » Razer 新款 Blade 18 比 Alienware 18 轻 1 千克，但速度一样快，甚至更安静一些

Alienware 18 Area-51: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 4.2 kg
   » 与微星 Titan 18 HX 相比，Alienware 18 Area-51 少了一项关键功能

   » Alienware 18 Area-51 的性能几乎超过了所有其他游戏笔记本电脑，我们有基准测试来证明这一点

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » 联想Legion Pro 5i 16 与Legion Pro 7i 16：我们对两者进行了评测

Alienware 16 Area-51: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 3.3 kg
   » 尺寸依然重要：Alienware 16 Area-51 RTX 5080 性能超越 Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090

   » Alienware 16 Area-51 将其最快的 175 W TGP 图形模式锁定在最响亮的风扇设置后面

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » RTX 5090 笔记本电脑对比：技嘉 Aorus Master 16 排名如何？

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » XMG Neo 16 E25：仍是最佳游戏笔记本电脑之一，但缺乏高级 Optimus/G-Sync 功能

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25): Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » 用 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的钱购买 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑的性能 - 在我们的评测中，配备全新 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑的 XMG Pro 16 显示出强劲性能

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Strix G16 2025 评测结论：不错的 RTX 5080 游戏笔记本电脑，但更快的 Ryzen 9 9955HX 仅支持 RTX 5070 Ti

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
   » 搭载 RTX 5090、迷你 LED 屏幕和雷电 5 的华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) 现已接受预订

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Arrow Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235
   14x 3.4 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
   14x 4.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
   1.7 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
   16x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
   16x - 5.4 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
   16x - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
   16x 2.3 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-10)