Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel Ultra 9 275HX

英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 是一款基于箭湖架构的移动高端 CPU，适用于游戏笔记本电脑。它提供 24 个内核，包括 8 个主频高达 5.4 GHz 的高性能内核和 16 个主频高达 4.6 GHz 的高效能内核。CPU 可访问 40 MB 二级缓存和 36 MB 三级缓存，TDP 为 55 瓦。

SoC 集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU，具有 13 个 TOPS (Int8)，可选择支持 vPro Essentials。集成内存控制器最高支持 192 GB DDR5-6400（双通道，可选 ECC）。集成图形处理器（iGPU）是一块小型英特尔图形显卡，具有四个 Xe 内核，运行频率为 300 - 1900 MHz。

性能 - 高端

由于 P 核心的提升时钟频率低了 100 MHz，因此 Ultra 9 275HX 的性能仅略低于顶级型号 Core Ultra 9 285HX。 酷睿至尊 9 285HX因此仍低于同类 台式机酷睿至尊 9 285K(主频高达 5.7 GHz，TDP 为 125 瓦）。由于内核（尤其是高效内核）的 IPC 有所改进，该 CPU 的性能应略低于或达到以下水平 猛禽湖酷睿 i9-14900HX(8 + 16 核，最高 5.8 / 4.1 GHz）的水平。这使得该 CPU 非常适合于高端游戏和内容创建等要求苛刻的任务。

生产--台积电和 Foveros

Arrow Lake-HX 芯片基于桌面级 Arrow Lake-S 芯片，由多个芯片组组成。CPU 部分由台积电采用现代 N3B（3 纳米）工艺制造，GPU 也由台积电采用 N5P 工艺制造。SoC 和 I/O 芯片采用台积电 N6 工艺制造。底层芯片由英特尔公司采用 22 纳米工艺制造，并通过 Fovero 的 3D 封装实现了单个芯片的封装。

CodenameArrow Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Arrow Lake

Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-HX

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX « 2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Clock Rate2100 - 5400 MHz
Level 2 Cache40 MB
Level 3 Cache36 MB
Number of Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
GPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (300 - 1900 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
48.4 pt (81%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
44.2 -9%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 -8%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 -7%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.2 -7%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
45.7 -6%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46.1 -5%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.7 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
46.9 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
48.4
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50 3%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 24%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 130.7     avg: 135     median: 135.7 (76%)     max: 138 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1913     avg: 2101     median: 2133.5 (40%)     max: 2223 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 33449     avg: 35985     median: 36329 (34%)     max: 39001 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -99%
...
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28225 -22%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28872 -20%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
29063 -19%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
29352 -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
29400 -18%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30428 -15%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
30706 -15%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 -9%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
33078 -8%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
35985
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
39518 10%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
40117 11%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 199%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2126     avg: 2179     median: 2192 (93%)     max: 2252 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -97%
...
Intel Core i7-13800H
2017 -7%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2034 -7%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 -6%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -5%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 -4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2141 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2152 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2174 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2179
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2185 0%
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2202 1%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2209 1%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2213 2%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 4%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2348 8%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 811     avg: 841     median: 843 (93%)     max: 866 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 13178     avg: 14167     median: 14183 (35%)     max: 15517 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5044     avg: 5666     median: 5746 (36%)     max: 6060 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -99%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
4320 -24%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4437 -22%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4522 -20%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4565 -19%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4724 -17%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
4784 -16%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
4830 -15%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5363 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5666
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
6089 7%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
6232 10%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 180%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
03056109151220152518302135244027453050335536603965427045754880518554905795Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 317     avg: 332.1     median: 331 (93%)     max: 343 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
Intel Core i9-14900HX
305.2 -8%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
306.1 -8%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
307 -8%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
307 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 -6%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
315 -5%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
317 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
322 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
324 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
332.1
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
336.5 1%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
355.5 7%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 104686     avg: 115328     median: 117940 (68%)     max: 122818 MIPS
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6186     avg: 6714     median: 6669 (79%)     max: 7036 MIPS
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 35     avg: 38.2     median: 38.9 (68%)     max: 41.2 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 135     avg: 147.3     median: 148 (2%)     max: 162 Seconds
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 86     avg: 92.3     median: 90 (1%)     max: 102 Seconds
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3943     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4568 sec
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
123908 Points (95%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23558     avg: 26406     median: 26274.5 (65%)     max: 29050 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
104288 Points (85%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
26517 Points (67%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 41718     avg: 46646     median: 47850 (85%)     max: 48283 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 15473     avg: 16669     median: 16771 (71%)     max: 17607 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2917     avg: 3042     median: 3045 (76%)     max: 3158 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 16033     avg: 19288     median: 19381.5 (75%)     max: 21668 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-9120C
533 -97%
...
Intel Core i9-13900HX
16523 -14%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
16633 -14%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
16653 -14%
Intel Core i7-13850HX
16782 -13%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
16828 -13%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
16855 -13%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
16957 -12%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17401 -10%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
17564 -9%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19288
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
19575 1%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
20487 6%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
21254 10%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
21269 10%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
22104 15%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22527 17%
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
23384 21%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
25760 34%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2034     avg: 2191     median: 2199 (86%)     max: 2292 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21195     avg: 23153     median: 22794 (41%)     max: 25855 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 405     avg: 413.1     median: 411.5 (0%)     max: 420 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 126363     avg: 128252     median: 128252 (99%)     max: 130140 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 317     avg: 330.3     median: 334 (92%)     max: 336 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 315     avg: 345.1     median: 346 (62%)     max: 359 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1995     avg: 2100     median: 2091 (78%)     max: 2221 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 130.4     avg: 200.2     median: 227 (39%)     max: 249 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 153.1     avg: 224.8     median: 245.5 (45%)     max: 255 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 16.2     avg: 35.9     median: 37.8 (25%)     max: 45.5 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 10.1     avg: 22.6     median: 27.6 (31%)     max: 33.1 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 22.8     avg: 26.1     median: 23.9 (18%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33
log 01. 00:39:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:29:55 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.01s ... 0.011s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 18886 +0.017s ... 0.03s

#12 got single benchmarks 18886 +0.025s ... 0.055s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.643s ... 0.698s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.698s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.698s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor

仅有 12 GB VRAM 的高端产品？ - NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑评测

仅有 12 GB VRAM 的高端产品？ - NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑评测

继GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑这两款移动 GPU 推出几周后，我们又迎来了配备 12 GB VRAM 的全新GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑。我们评测了新款 XMG Pro 16 (E25) 中与英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 搭配...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
RTX 5080 笔记本电脑是 WQHD 游戏的最佳选择 - 华硕 ROG Strix G16 G615 评测

RTX 5080 笔记本电脑是 WQHD 游戏的最佳选择 - 华硕 ROG Strix G16 G615 评测

新款华硕 ROG Strix G16 最多可配备 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑，但这在游戏时不会有太大问题。Strix G16 代表了一款不错的游戏套装，配备了雾面 IPS 显示屏、快速的酷睿 Ultra 9 275 HX 以及非常不错的维护选项。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.6 kg
联想Legion Pro 7i 16 代 10 笔记本电脑评测：几乎无损的 400 W 电源

联想Legion Pro 7i 16 代 10 笔记本电脑评测：几乎无损的 400 W 电源

今年，最新的Legion Pro 7i 16 并没有越做越薄，而是加厚了机身，以便从英特尔 Arrow Lake 和 Nvidia Blackwell 硬件中榨取更多性能。功耗可能较高，但原始性能毋庸置疑。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.6 kg
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX 对决英特尔酷睿至尊 9 275HX

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 分析：最快游戏 CPU 之争

除了新款 RTX 5000 笔记本 GPU 之外，AMD 和英特尔的新款 HX CPU 也已到货。我们将 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX 与 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 进行了对比，不仅比较了 CPU 的纯粹性能，还比较了与全新 RTX 5090 笔记本 GPU 配合使用时的游戏性能。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.3 kg
配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测

配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测

华硕更新了其游戏旗舰 Strix SCAR 18，配备了 Core Ultra 9 275HX、GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和出色的 240 Hz 迷你 LED 显示屏。此外，该设备组件的访问也变得更加方便，而且还有大量的照明元素。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.3 kg

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H : Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71

Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72

HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
   » 搭载 RTX 5090、迷你 LED 屏幕和雷电 5 的华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) 现已接受预订

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Arrow Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
   16x 4.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-14900HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.8 GHz
+ Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
   14x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
+ Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
   14x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13980HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13950HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.5 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
   16x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
   16x 2.4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-10)