Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel Ultra 9 275HX

英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 是一款基于箭湖架构的移动高端 CPU，适用于游戏笔记本电脑。它提供 24 个内核，包括 8 个主频高达 5.4 GHz 的高性能内核和 16 个主频高达 4.6 GHz 的高效能内核。CPU 可访问 40 MB 二级缓存和 36 MB 三级缓存，TDP 为 55 瓦。

SoC 集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU，具有 13 个 TOPS (Int8)，可选择支持 vPro Essentials。集成内存控制器最高支持 192 GB DDR5-6400（双通道，可选 ECC）。集成图形处理器（iGPU）是一块小型英特尔图形显卡，具有四个 Xe 内核，运行频率为 300 - 1900 MHz。

性能 - 高端

由于 P 核心的提升时钟频率低了 100 MHz，因此 Ultra 9 275HX 的性能仅略低于顶级型号 Core Ultra 9 285HX。 酷睿至尊 9 285HX因此仍低于同类 台式机酷睿至尊 9 285K(主频高达 5.7 GHz，TDP 为 125 瓦）。由于内核（尤其是高效内核）的 IPC 有所改进，该 CPU 的性能应略低于或达到以下水平 猛禽湖酷睿 i9-14900HX(8 + 16 核，最高 5.8 / 4.1 GHz）的水平。这使得该 CPU 非常适合于高端游戏和内容创建等要求苛刻的任务。

生产--台积电和 Foveros

Arrow Lake-HX 芯片基于桌面级 Arrow Lake-S 芯片，由多个芯片组组成。CPU 部分由台积电采用现代 N3B（3 纳米）工艺制造，GPU 也由台积电采用 N5P 工艺制造。SoC 和 I/O 芯片采用台积电 N6 工艺制造。底层芯片由英特尔公司采用 22 纳米工艺制造，并通过 Fovero 的 3D 封装实现了单个芯片的封装。

CodenameArrow Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Arrow Lake

Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-HX

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX « 2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Clock Rate2100 - 5400 MHz
Level 2 Cache40 MB
Level 3 Cache36 MB
Number of Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
GPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (300 - 1900 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
49.2 pt (82%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.4 -10%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 -9%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.2 -8%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
45.8 -7%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
45.8 -7%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46.1 -6%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.8 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
46.9 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.5 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
49.2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
49.2 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
49.6 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50.1 2%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.2 22%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.1     avg: 134.2     median: 136 (76%)     max: 138.2 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1547     avg: 2004     median: 2060 (38%)     max: 2288 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30712     avg: 35706     median: 36329 (34%)     max: 40970 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -99%
...
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28225 -21%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28872 -19%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
29063 -19%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
29352 -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
29400 -18%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30428 -15%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
30706 -14%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
33078 -7%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
35706
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
39065 9%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
39575 11%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
40117 12%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 202%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2009     avg: 2196     median: 2216 (93%)     max: 2267 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -97%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2059 -6%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -6%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2120 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2141 -3%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2167 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2185 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2196
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2202 0%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2209 1%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2213 1%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 3%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2357 7%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 774     avg: 845     median: 859 (94%)     max: 870 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 12257     avg: 14038     median: 14183 (35%)     max: 16108 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4756     avg: 5655     median: 5746 (36%)     max: 6271 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -99%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
4320 -24%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4437 -22%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4522 -20%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4565 -19%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4724 -16%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
4784 -15%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
4830 -15%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5363 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5655
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
6043 7%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
6090 8%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
6232 10%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 180%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
03156309451260157518902205252028353150346537804095441047255040535556705985Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 306     avg: 333.5     median: 336 (94%)     max: 343 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
307 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 -7%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
315 -6%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
317 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
318 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
324 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
327 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
327 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
331 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
333.5
...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
327 -2%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
356.7 7%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 99248     avg: 115529     median: 117940 (68%)     max: 124155 MIPS
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6186     avg: 6818     median: 6970 (82%)     max: 7149 MIPS
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.7     avg: 38.4     median: 39.5 (69%)     max: 43.8 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 134     avg: 154.3     median: 148.5 (2%)     max: 190 Seconds
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 82     avg: 94.8     median: 92 (1%)     max: 116 Seconds
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3943     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4568 sec
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
123908 Points (95%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21109     avg: 26281     median: 26439 (65%)     max: 29050 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104288     avg: 107108     median: 107108 (87%)     max: 109928 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 22080     avg: 25939     median: 26201.5 (66%)     max: 29274 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 37357     avg: 45871     median: 47452.5 (85%)     max: 53054 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 15406     avg: 16390     median: 16317.5 (69%)     max: 17607 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2917     avg: 3065     median: 3062 (76%)     max: 3160 points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 16033     avg: 19545     median: 19499.5 (76%)     max: 21668 points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-9120C
533 -97%
...
Intel Core i7-13850HX
16782 -14%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
16828 -14%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
16855 -14%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
16957 -13%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17401 -11%
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
17557 -10%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
17564 -10%
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
17576 -10%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
18488 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19545
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
20200 3%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
20487 5%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
21254 9%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
21269 9%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
22104 13%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22527 15%
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
23384 20%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
25760 32%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2034     avg: 2214     median: 2235 (87%)     max: 2292 points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19105     avg: 23281     median: 23308 (42%)     max: 25855 points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 404     avg: 411.2     median: 410.5 (0%)     max: 420 ms
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 124210     avg: 127446     median: 127124 (96%)     max: 130140 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 317     avg: 332.2     median: 333 (91%)     max: 341 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 315     avg: 345.3     median: 346.5 (62%)     max: 360 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1857     avg: 2147     median: 2183.5 (82%)     max: 2282 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 93.9     avg: 191.5     median: 215 (37%)     max: 249 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 153.1     avg: 227.2     median: 241 (44%)     max: 259 Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.3     avg: 28.7     median: 26.8 (18%)     max: 46.3 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 10.1     avg: 21.3     median: 21.2 (23%)     max: 36.9 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.4     avg: 25.5     median: 24 (18%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33
log 15. 06:36:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 Jun 2025 05:35:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.011s ... 0.012s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 18886 +0.015s ... 0.028s

#12 got single benchmarks 18886 +0.034s ... 0.062s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.57s ... 0.632s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.632s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.632s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor

Alienware 16 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测：戴尔迄今为止最好的旗舰游戏笔记本电脑

Alienware 16 Area-51 笔记本电脑评测：戴尔迄今为止最好的旗舰游戏笔记本电脑

戴尔今年将从头开始刷新其 Alienware 产品线，采用新的 Arrow Lake CPU、新的 Blackwell GPU 和新的 AW30 设计语言。Area-51 的外观和手感都比之前的产品更好，但它仍然表现出许多与 Alienware 相同的优点和缺点。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 16.00" | 3.3 kg
搭载 RTX 5090 和 240 Hz OLED，与 ROG、Legion 等公司竞争 - 技嘉 Aorus Master 16 游戏笔记本评测

搭载 RTX 5090 和 240 Hz OLED，与 ROG、Legion 等公司竞争 - 技嘉 Aorus Master 16 游戏笔记本评测

我们终于拿到了精通测试的 Aorus Master 16，它配备了 RTX 5090、OLED 显示屏、Thunderbolt 5、PCIe 5.0 和 WiFi 7。这就是售价 4300 美元的新性能之王？...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.5 kg
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 笔记本电脑评测：配备可选水冷系统的 RTX 5090 游戏本

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 笔记本电脑评测：配备可选水冷系统的 RTX 5090 游戏本

Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate 是目前市场上速度最快的游戏笔记本之一，可根据需要使用外部水冷。我们将这款 16 英寸机型与竞争对手进行了比较，并让它体验了最新的游戏。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.8 kg
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 笔记本电脑评测：RTX 5080 在游戏巨头中表现如何？

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 笔记本电脑评测：RTX 5080 在游戏巨头中表现如何？

Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 的售价超过 4,000 美元，主要面向预算充足的狂热游戏玩家。作为回报，它提供了英特尔和 Nvidia 最新的高端硬件。我们将这款 18 英寸机型与其竞争对手以及基于最新 CPU/GPU 的其他机型进行比较。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.6 kg
得益于 300 Hz mini LED，最快的游戏笔记本电脑现在更出色了 - XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

得益于 300 Hz mini LED，最快的游戏笔记本电脑现在更出色了 - XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

Neo 16 是 XMG 传统上速度最快的游戏笔记本电脑，2025 型号除了配备 AMD/Intel 的 HX CPU 和新的 Blackwell GPU 外，还配备了 300 Hz mini LED 雾面显示屏。然而，它的高性能却被一些连接方面的瑕疵所抵消。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.9 kg

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和游戏笔记本电脑中的迷你 LED - 华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 16 2025 评测

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25): Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑和高达 128 GB 内存的游戏/工作站混合型笔记本电脑 - XMG Pro 16 (E25) 笔记本电脑评测

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » 惠普 Omen Max 16 笔记本电脑评测：速度超快，但温度有点高

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  Review » Aorus Master 18 游戏笔记本电脑评测：RTX 5090 带来的代价

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Engineering Sample: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
  Review » 仅有 12 GB VRAM 的高端产品？ - NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑评测

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » RTX 5080 笔记本电脑是 WQHD 游戏的最佳选择 - 华硕 ROG Strix G16 G615 评测

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » 联想Legion Pro 7i 16 代 10 笔记本电脑评测：几乎无损的 400 W 电源

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 分析：最快游戏 CPU 之争

  Review » 配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H : Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71

Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72

HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng

Alienware 16 Area-51: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 3.3 kg
   » 尺寸依然重要：Alienware 16 Area-51 RTX 5080 性能超越 Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090

   » Alienware 16 Area-51 将其最快的 175 W TGP 图形模式锁定在最响亮的风扇设置后面

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » RTX 5090 笔记本电脑对比：技嘉 Aorus Master 16 排名如何？

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » XMG Neo 16 E25：仍是最佳游戏笔记本电脑之一，但缺乏高级 Optimus/G-Sync 功能

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25): Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » 用 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的钱购买 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑的性能 - 在我们的评测中，配备全新 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑的 XMG Pro 16 显示出强劲性能

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Strix G16 2025 评测结论：不错的 RTX 5080 游戏笔记本电脑，但更快的 Ryzen 9 9955HX 仅支持 RTX 5070 Ti

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 18.00", 3.3 kg
   » 搭载 RTX 5090、迷你 LED 屏幕和雷电 5 的华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) 现已接受预订

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Arrow Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235
   14x 3.4 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
   16x 4.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-14900HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.8 GHz
+ Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
   14x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
+ Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
   14x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13980HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13950HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.5 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
   16x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
   16x 2.4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-10)