Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Intel Ultra 9 285H

英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 285H是基于箭湖架构的移动高端 CPU，适用于大型笔记本电脑。它提供 16 个内核，包括 6 个主频高达 5.4 GHz 的高性能内核（Lion Cove）和 8 个主频高达 4.5 GHz 的高效能内核（Skymont），以及两个主频高达 2.5 GHz 的低功耗内核（Skymont）。CPU 可访问 24 MB 高速缓存，TDP 为 45 瓦。

SoC 集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU，具有 13 个 TOPS (Int8)，可选择支持 vPro Enterprise。集成内存控制器支持高达 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 或 DDR5-6400（双通道）。集成图形处理器（iGPU）是一块 英特尔 Arc 140T 图形卡提供八个 Xe 内核，主频高达 2.35 GHz。

性能 - 高端

顶级型号提供芯片内置的所有内核，时钟频率相对较高，可达 5.4 GHz。得益于内核（尤其是高效内核）IPC 的提升，CPU 应能达到旧版 猛禽湖酷睿 9 270H(6 + 8 个内核，最高 5.8 / 4.1 GHz）的水平。这使得该 CPU 非常适合于高端游戏和内容创建等要求苛刻的任务。

芯片组设计

与台式机芯片和 HX 芯片一样，Arrow Lake-H 芯片也是基于单个芯片，这些芯片采用 Foveros 3D 封装，置于英特尔提供的 22 纳米基片上。CPU 部分来自台积电，采用现代 N3B（3 纳米）工艺。与 HX 一样，GPU 也在台积电生产，采用 N5P 工艺制造。SoC 和 I/O Tile 也来自台积电，但采用的是较早的 N6 工艺。

CodenameArrow Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow Lake

Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H « 4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Clock Rate4500 - 5400 MHz
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Manufacturing Technology5 nm
Max. Temperature110 °C
GPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2350 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT8
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Starting Price$651 U.S.
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
43.1 pt (72%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
41 -5%
Intel Core i7-13800H
41.5 -4%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 -3%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
42.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.2 -2%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
42.3 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
42.8 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
43.1
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 0%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.1 2%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.4 3%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 4%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.1 5%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 5%
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
45.5 6%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46 7%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50.1 16%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 39%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 126     avg: 127.6     median: 127.3 (64%)     max: 130 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 740     avg: 1020     median: 1066.5 (20%)     max: 1194 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15070     avg: 19533     median: 20442 (19%)     max: 23576 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1979     avg: 2118     median: 2133 (87%)     max: 2164 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2013 -5%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2013 -5%
Intel Core i7-13800H
2017 -5%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2045 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
2046 -3%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2076 -2%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2118
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2121 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2128 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2150 2%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 3%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2184 3%
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2202 4%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2209 4%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2213 4%
...
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 7%
max:
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
2459 16%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 761     avg: 812     median: 817 (89%)     max: 830 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5861     avg: 7605     median: 7920 (19%)     max: 9208 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2280     avg: 3029     median: 3137 (20%)     max: 3496 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
017535052570087510501225140015751750192521002275245026252800297531503325Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 288     avg: 310.7     median: 313 (87%)     max: 322 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
Apple M4 (10 cores)
302 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
303 -2%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
303.6 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
304.3 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
305.2 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
305.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
306 -2%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
307 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
308.5 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
310.7
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
315.5 2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
316.4 2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
326 5%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
327 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
330.7 6%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
334.1 8%
...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
326 5%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
357.8 15%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 35.99     avg: 38.3     median: 38.7 (50%)     max: 40.33 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.7     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.82 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11334     avg: 11456     median: 11459 (69%)     max: 11576 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 72114     avg: 77213     median: 74797 (54%)     max: 84729 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 111175     avg: 113680     median: 113680 (73%)     max: 116185 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17328     avg: 17422     median: 17421.5 (21%)     max: 17515 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 104.802     avg: 206.2     median: 238.3 (3%)     max: 275.558 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.3     avg: 4.6     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.1 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6751     avg: 10391     median: 7690 (12%)     max: 16732 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 50116     avg: 61364     median: 60639 (35%)     max: 71959 MIPS
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5403     avg: 6053     median: 6136 (72%)     max: 6419 MIPS
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 176.05     avg: 180.6     median: 180.6 (5%)     max: 185.15 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 356.5     avg: 359.8     median: 359.8 (9%)     max: 363 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17.9     avg: 22.6     median: 23.6 (41%)     max: 27.2 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.9     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (25%)     max: 10 GB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 251     avg: 315.8     median: 304.5 (4%)     max: 417 Seconds
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 151     avg: 192.6     median: 197 (1%)     max: 235 Seconds
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4079     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4794 sec
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15781     avg: 16231     median: 16206.5 (34%)     max: 16728 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.084     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.338 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.516     avg: 15.8     median: 15.7 (1%)     max: 16.138 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
389.3 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 81047     avg: 90659     median: 91977.5 (71%)     max: 97633 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17145     avg: 22065     median: 22766 (56%)     max: 24993 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 96324     avg: 109770     median: 112526 (91%)     max: 117704 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 97320     avg: 107393     median: 109206 (89%)     max: 113839 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 103278     avg: 114769     median: 116506 (94%)     max: 124524 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 14206     avg: 20626     median: 21545.5 (55%)     max: 23640 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21123     avg: 32194     median: 34056 (61%)     max: 35532 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6727     avg: 11732     median: 12029 (51%)     max: 14095 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2665     avg: 2894     median: 2895 (67%)     max: 3110 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 15330     avg: 16331     median: 15647.5 (61%)     max: 17992 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2121     avg: 2428     median: 2428 (77%)     max: 2735 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12168     avg: 13662     median: 13661.5 (56%)     max: 15155 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1911     avg: 2060     median: 2060 (69%)     max: 2256 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13140     avg: 15341     median: 15207 (27%)     max: 17487 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1945     avg: 2056     median: 2027 (9%)     max: 2196 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14890     avg: 15084     median: 15136 (48%)     max: 15225 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8471     avg: 8740     median: 8530 (85%)     max: 9220 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 54076     avg: 55531     median: 55924 (55%)     max: 56593 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 418     avg: 447     median: 450 (1%)     max: 477 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 109360     avg: 118012     median: 118638 (78%)     max: 125412 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 254     avg: 298.8     median: 311 (81%)     max: 323.6 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 280     avg: 323.1     median: 324 (58%)     max: 358 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1785     avg: 2020     median: 2064 (77%)     max: 2227 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 53.2     avg: 90.2     median: 90.5 (16%)     max: 131.6 Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65.4     avg: 106.2     median: 102.8 (19%)     max: 164.2 Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.27     avg: 13.5     median: 8 (5%)     max: 31.5 Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.65     avg: 9.4     median: 10.3 (12%)     max: 14.1 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 21.3     avg: 30.1     median: 29.6 (22%)     max: 42.8 Points per Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.34
log 24. 02:17:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:55:31 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.011s ... 0.011s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.013s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18542 +0.015s ... 0.028s

#11 got single benchmarks 18542 +0.029s ... 0.056s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +1.101s ... 1.157s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.157s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.157s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H processor

出色的串联 OLED 显示屏，1600 尼特--联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G10 灵光版评测

出色的串联 OLED 显示屏，1600 尼特--联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G10 灵光版评测

Yoga Pro 9i 16 已经配备了非常出色的 OLED 屏幕，但新的串联 OLED 面板更加出色。我们测试了配备全新 3.2K OLED 面板、酷睿 Ultra 9、64 GB 内存和移动GeForce RTX 5070 的高端配置。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
GMKtec EVO-T1

高端迷你 PC - GMKtec EVO-T1 评测，配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 285H、80 瓦 TDP、64 GB 内存和 eGPU 选项

GMKtec 推出了 EVO-T1，这是一款基于英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 285H 的迷你 PC，外观优雅，功能强大。制造商承诺提供高性能和多种应用选项，TDP 最高可达 80 瓦。我们的测试将明确 EVO-T1 是否是经典台式电脑的理想替代品，以及 GMKtec 是否实现了自己的承诺。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 946 g
Geekom 迷你 IT15

2025 微型电脑评测：Geekom Mini IT15--面向专业人士和创意人士的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 迷你工作站评测

Geekom 的 Mini IT15 是一款功能强大、结构紧凑的台式电脑，采用最新一代英特尔酷睿 Ultra 处理器。制造商承诺该产品具有高性能和多功能性。我们的评测将揭示这款迷你电脑是否能真正替代传统台式机，以及 Geekom 是否实现了自己的承诺。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 595 g
纤薄游戏玩家的 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑给人留下深刻印象--华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测

纤薄游戏玩家的 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑给人留下深刻印象--华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测

即使搭载了GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑 GPU，华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 也是一款出色的游戏和多媒体笔记本电脑。不过，3399 欧元的价格仍然相当高，而同类产品 Razer Blade 16 的价格则低了 400 欧元。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比

配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比

如果你想要配备GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑的最轻薄游戏笔记本，目前你可以在华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 和雷蛇 Blade 16 之间进行选择。但性能并不代表一切。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 1.9 kg

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 和 64 GB 内存的超薄游戏笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Intel Arc Graphics 140T 分析 - Arrow Lake-H iGPU 获得帧生成支持

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Intel Arc Graphics 140T 分析 - Arrow Lake-H iGPU 获得帧生成支持

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 英特尔箭湖-H CPU 分析：酷睿 Ultra 200H 让 Lunar Lake 近乎多余

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 英特尔箭湖-H CPU 分析：酷睿 Ultra 200H 让 Lunar Lake 近乎多余

  Review » 微星Prestige 16 AI Evo评测--配备高速Arrow Lake CPU、运行速度惊人的多媒体笔记本电脑

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 华硕 ZenBook Duo OLED 评测--配备英特尔 Arrow Lake 处理器的多屏可转换产品

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CP: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CP

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H

LG gram Pro AI 17 17Z90TR: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 17.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro AI 17 17Z90TR

Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CR: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CR

Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-73: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-73

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IAH10

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX

Asus Vivobook Pro 15 N6506CU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 15 N6506CU

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 9 285H: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 9 285H

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G10 是最好的 Windows 多媒体笔记本电脑吗？

   » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 采用的全新 Tandem-OLED 面板是目前最好的笔记本显示屏

GMK EVO-T1: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 0.9 kg
   » GMKtec EVO-T1 评测：配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 的迷你 PC，通过 OCuLink 实现人工智能模型、LLM 和游戏功能

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 评论：功能强大，但速度仍慢于较小的 G14 同类产品

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Arrow Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285
   24x 1.9 GHz - 5.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
   20x 3.3 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
   20x 3.3 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245
   14x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235
   14x 3.4 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
   14x 4.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i7-14650HX
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13700HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core 9 270H
   14x 2 GHz - 5.8 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900HK
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-10)