Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Intel Ultra 9 285H

英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 285H是基于箭湖架构的移动高端 CPU，适用于大型笔记本电脑。它提供 16 个内核，包括 6 个主频高达 5.4 GHz 的高性能内核（Lion Cove）和 8 个主频高达 4.5 GHz 的高效能内核（Skymont），以及两个主频高达 2.5 GHz 的低功耗内核（Skymont）。CPU 可访问 24 MB 高速缓存，TDP 为 45 瓦。

SoC 集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU，具有 13 个 TOPS (Int8)，可选择支持 vPro Enterprise。集成内存控制器支持高达 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 或 DDR5-6400（双通道）。集成图形处理器（iGPU）是一块 英特尔 Arc 140T 图形卡提供八个 Xe 内核，主频高达 2.35 GHz。

性能 - 高端

顶级型号提供芯片内置的所有内核，时钟频率相对较高，可达 5.4 GHz。得益于内核（尤其是高效内核）IPC 的提升，CPU 应能达到旧版 猛禽湖酷睿 9 270H(6 + 8 个内核，最高 5.8 / 4.1 GHz）的水平。这使得该 CPU 非常适合于高端游戏和内容创建等要求苛刻的任务。

芯片组设计

与台式机芯片和 HX 芯片一样，Arrow Lake-H 芯片也是基于单个芯片，这些芯片采用 Foveros 3D 封装，置于英特尔提供的 22 纳米基片上。CPU 部分来自台积电，采用现代 N3B（3 纳米）工艺。与 HX 一样，GPU 也在台积电生产，采用 N5P 工艺制造。SoC 和 I/O Tile 也来自台积电，但采用的是较早的 N6 工艺。

CodenameArrow Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow Lake

Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H4.4 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H « 4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Clock Rate4500 - 5400 MHz
Level 2 Cache26 MB
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Manufacturing Technology5 nm
Max. Temperature110 °C
GPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2350 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT8
Chip AI99 TOPS INT8
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Starting Price$651 U.S.
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
43.2 pt (72%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
Intel Core i7-13800H
41.5 -4%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 -3%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
42.1 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.2 -2%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
42.3 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
42.6 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
42.8 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
43.2
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 0%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.1 2%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 3%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 4%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.1 4%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 5%
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
45.5 5%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46 6%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
49.9 16%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 39%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 124.8     avg: 127.3     median: 127 (64%)     max: 130 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 740     avg: 1068     median: 1142 (21%)     max: 1194 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15070     avg: 20191     median: 20781.5 (19%)     max: 23576 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1979     avg: 2110     median: 2129.5 (87%)     max: 2166 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2012 -5%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2013 -5%
Intel Core i7-13800H
2017 -4%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2045 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
2057 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2060 -2%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -2%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2110
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2133 1%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2154 2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2171 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 3%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2194 4%
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2202 4%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2209 5%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2213 5%
...
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 8%
max:
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
2459 17%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 761     avg: 813     median: 814.5 (89%)     max: 837 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5861     avg: 7870     median: 8120 (20%)     max: 9208 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2280     avg: 3085     median: 3177.5 (20%)     max: 3496 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
017535052570087510501225140015751750192521002275245026252800297531503325Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 288     avg: 311.3     median: 313 (87%)     max: 322 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
303 -3%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
303.6 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
304.3 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
304.4 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
305.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
306 -2%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
307 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
308 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
311.3
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
316.4 2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
324.2 4%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
326 5%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
327 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
331.5 6%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
334.4 7%
...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
326 5%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
357.8 15%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 35.99     avg: 38.8     median: 39.4 (51%)     max: 40.33 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (90%)     max: 3.83 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11334     avg: 11485     median: 11514.5 (70%)     max: 11576 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 72114     avg: 77965     median: 77507.5 (56%)     max: 84729 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 111175     avg: 114368     median: 115744 (74%)     max: 116185 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17328     avg: 17550     median: 17515 (21%)     max: 17807 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 82.295     avg: 175.2     median: 171.6 (2%)     max: 275.558 s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.3     avg: 4.3     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.1 s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6751     avg: 9951     median: 8160 (13%)     max: 16732 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 50116     avg: 64016     median: 66410.5 (38%)     max: 71959 MIPS
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5403     avg: 6077     median: 6123.5 (72%)     max: 6419 MIPS
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 176.05     avg: 182.5     median: 185.2 (5%)     max: 186.2 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 356.5     avg: 365.2     median: 363 (9%)     max: 376 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17.9     avg: 23.5     median: 24.3 (43%)     max: 27.2 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.2 (34%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.2 GB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.9     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (25%)     max: 10 GB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 251     avg: 294.5     median: 266 (3%)     max: 417 Seconds
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 151     avg: 180.8     median: 164.5 (1%)     max: 235 Seconds
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4079     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4794 sec
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15588     avg: 16102     median: 15795 (34%)     max: 16728 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.084     avg: 7.6     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 8.576 s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.516     avg: 15.9     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 16.362 s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
389.3 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 81047     avg: 93028     median: 95638 (73%)     max: 102504 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17145     avg: 22682     median: 23303 (57%)     max: 24993 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 96324     avg: 109644     median: 110306 (90%)     max: 117704 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 97320     avg: 107955     median: 110203 (89%)     max: 113839 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 103278     avg: 114165     median: 114428 (92%)     max: 124524 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 14206     avg: 21168     median: 21599 (55%)     max: 23640 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21123     avg: 33025     median: 34354.5 (61%)     max: 37440 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6727     avg: 11995     median: 12408 (52%)     max: 14095 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2665     avg: 2883     median: 2878 (67%)     max: 3110 points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 15284     avg: 16481     median: 16207 (63%)     max: 17992 points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2121     avg: 2476     median: 2572 (82%)     max: 2735 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12168     avg: 14274     median: 15155 (62%)     max: 15499 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1689     avg: 2046     median: 2096 (70%)     max: 2256 points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13140     avg: 15584     median: 15703 (28%)     max: 17487 points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1801     avg: 1992     median: 1986 (9%)     max: 2196 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14890     avg: 15223     median: 15180.5 (48%)     max: 15641 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8216     avg: 8609     median: 8500.5 (85%)     max: 9220 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 54076     avg: 56041     median: 56258.5 (55%)     max: 57570 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 418     avg: 445.7     median: 440.5 (1%)     max: 477 ms
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 109360     avg: 119964     median: 121786 (80%)     max: 125617 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 236     avg: 297.1     median: 306.5 (80%)     max: 323.6 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 230     avg: 318.5     median: 325 (58%)     max: 358 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1771     avg: 2021     median: 2037 (75%)     max: 2236 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 53.2     avg: 96.5     median: 103.1 (18%)     max: 131.6 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65.4     avg: 109.5     median: 104.5 (19%)     max: 164.2 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.27     avg: 11.7     median: 7.5 (5%)     max: 31.5 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.65     avg: 9.5     median: 9.9 (7%)     max: 14.1 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 21.3     avg: 29.4     median: 28 (21%)     max: 42.8 Points per Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Amazon Logo
  • $1,128.00
    ASUS Vivobook S16 Copilot+ AI PC Laptop | 16" 2.8k OLED 120Hz | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 32GB RAM 1TB SSD | RGB Backlit for Creator Designer Business Professional Win11 Pro w/DLCA Accessory
  • $1,129.00
    ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED 2024 Laptop, 16-Core Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14" WUXGA Touchscreen Display, Intel Arc 140T Graphics, 32GB LPDDR5 1TB SSD, Backlit Keyboard, Thunderbolt 4, Wi-Fi 7, Win11 Home
  • $1,094.00
    ASUS Vivobook S16 AI PC Laptop 16" 2.8k OLED 120Hz (600nits, 100% DCI-P3) Intel 16-core Ultra 9 285H 32GB RAM 1TB SSD Backlit for Creator Designer Business Professional Win11 ICP Hub w/Copilot+ AI
  • $1,099.00
    HP OmniBook 5 Laptop 16" WUXGA IPS Touchscreen Intel 16-core Ultra 9 285H 32GB RAM 1TB SSD for Creator Designer Business Professional Backlit IR Camera Win11Pro ICP Hub w/Copilot+ AI
  • $2,231.24
    Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16" Laptop - Intel Ultra 9 285H 16-Core, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, 32GB RAM, 1TB NVMe SSD, 16.0" 3.2K Tandem OLED 120Hz 1000-nits, Windows 11 Pro

v1.35
log 26. 12:21:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 26 Jan 2026 10:47:48 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.01s ... 0.011s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.013s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18542 +0.021s ... 0.034s

#11 got single benchmarks 18542 +0.058s ... 0.092s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +1.479s ... 1.571s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.695s ... 2.267s

#15 return log +0s ... 2.267s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H processor

ThinkPad X1 Extreme 当之无愧的继任者 - 联想 ThinkPad T1g 8 代评测

ThinkPad X1 Extreme 当之无愧的继任者 - 联想 ThinkPad T1g 8 代评测

联想推出的 ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 是备受喜爱的 ThinkPad X1 Extreme 的继任者，它是一款功能强大的多媒体笔记本电脑，拥有强大的硬件、雾面串联 OLED 触摸显示屏和联想有史以来为 ThinkPad 配置的最出色的键盘。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 评测：并非最佳配置

联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 评测：并非最佳配置

GeForce RTX 5050 显卡的 Yoga Pro 9 16 比更昂贵的 RTX 5060 或 5070 显卡更便宜、更凉爽、更安静。遗憾的是，该系统的零售价接近 1800 美元，并不比高端配置便宜多少。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | 16.00" | 2 kg
华硕 NUC 15 Pro+

华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 评测：搭载英特尔 Core Ultra 9 285H 处理器的迷你 PC：高端性能

华硕希望通过华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 展示如今迷你机箱能容纳多少性能。紧凑的尺寸和先进的技术让这款迷你 PC 特别引人关注。但在日常使用中，这台小能手是否能达到性能数据所承诺的性能呢？在我们的测试中，我们将了解 NUC 15 Pro+ 是否真的可以替代经典台式机。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 690 g
Beelink GTI15 Ultra 评测：功能最齐全的迷你电脑之一

Beelink GTI15 Ultra 评测：功能最齐全的迷你电脑之一

GTI15 Ultra 配备了 Arrow Lake-H 和 10 Gbps RJ-45 LAN 端口，速度比以前更快了。不过，与 GTI13 Ultra 相比，扬声器仍然没有改进。
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 1.3 kg
联想 Yoga Pro 7i 10 创享版评测--配备出色 OLED 触摸屏的多媒体笔记本电脑

联想 Yoga Pro 7i 10 创享版评测--配备出色 OLED 触摸屏的多媒体笔记本电脑

Yoga Pro 14 G10 配备了英特尔酷睿9 285H处理器，速度极快，全新的3K OLED触摸屏以120赫兹的频率提供了出色的图像质量。不过，高功耗限制也带来了一些问题。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.50" | 1.6 kg

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 出色的串联 OLED 显示屏，1600 尼特--联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G10 灵光版评测

GMK EVO-T1: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 0.9 kg
  Review » 高端迷你 PC - GMKtec EVO-T1 评测，配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 285H、80 瓦 TDP、64 GB 内存和 eGPU 选项

Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 0.6 kg
  Review » 2025 微型电脑评测：Geekom Mini IT15--面向专业人士和创意人士的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 迷你工作站评测

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 纤薄游戏玩家的 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑给人留下深刻印象--华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比

  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 和 64 GB 内存的超薄游戏笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Intel Arc Graphics 140T 分析 - Arrow Lake-H iGPU 获得帧生成支持

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Intel Arc Graphics 140T 分析 - Arrow Lake-H iGPU 获得帧生成支持

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 英特尔箭湖-H CPU 分析：酷睿 Ultra 200H 让 Lunar Lake 近乎多余

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 英特尔箭湖-H CPU 分析：酷睿 Ultra 200H 让 Lunar Lake 近乎多余

  Review » 微星Prestige 16 AI Evo评测--配备高速Arrow Lake CPU、运行速度惊人的多媒体笔记本电脑

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 华硕 ZenBook Duo OLED 评测--配备英特尔 Arrow Lake 处理器的多屏可转换产品

MSI Modern 15 H AI C2HMG: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 H AI C2HMG

Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71, RTX 5060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 14.50", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71, RTX 5060

HP Omen Transcend 14-fb1000: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Transcend 14-fb1000

Dell 16 Premium: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium

Dell Pro Max 14 Premium: NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Pro Max 14 Premium

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CP: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CP

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H

LG gram Pro AI 17 17Z90TR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 17.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro AI 17 17Z90TR

Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CR

Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-73: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-73

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IAH10

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX

Asus Vivobook Pro 15 N6506CU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 15 N6506CU

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 9 285H: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 9 285H

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
   » Core Ultra 9 285H 与 Core Ultra 7 255H 相比几乎没有任何优势

   » 比较联想 Yoga Pro 9 16 的三种主要配置

Beelink GTI15 Ultra: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 1.3 kg
   » Beelink GTI15 Ultra 四麦克风非常适合语音激活，但扬声器的音量较小。

   » Beellnk GTI15 Ultra PC 发布，原价几乎是 GTI13 Ultra 的两倍

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.50", 1.6 kg
   » 搭载英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 处理器的联想 Yoga Pro 7 显示了高功耗限制问题

   » 联想青睐英特尔，为 Yoga Pro 7 14 配备更好的屏幕和 SD 卡读卡器

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G10 是最好的 Windows 多媒体笔记本电脑吗？

   » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 采用的全新 Tandem-OLED 面板是目前最好的笔记本显示屏

GMK EVO-T1: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 0.9 kg
   » GMKtec EVO-T1 评测：配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 的迷你 PC，通过 OCuLink 实现人工智能模型、LLM 和游戏功能

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 评论：功能强大，但速度仍慢于较小的 G14 同类产品

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Arrow Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
   20x 3.3 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
   20x 3.3 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX
   24x 2.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285
   24x 1.9 GHz - 5.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245
   14x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235
   14x 3.4 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
   14x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
   14x 4.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
   12x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
   12x 3.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235U
   12x 2.4 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225U
   12x 2.4 GHz - 4.8 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX
   12x 2.9 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-12900HX
   16x 1.7 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
   14x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core i7-12800HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
- Intel Core i5-13600HX
   14x 1.9 GHz - 4.8 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-01- 8)