评价:Blade 14 2025 是一款非常出色的全能型产品
就像新的 刀锋 16一样,Blade 14 的 2025 型号也变得更加轻薄。机身依然非常精致,做工完美。接口依然很多,键盘很舒适,点击板也很出色,但音响系统仍有改进的余地。新的 OLED 屏幕具有出色的图像质量、快速的响应时间和准确的色彩,但亮度(尤其是在 HDR 模式下)可以更高一些。
雷蛇使用 AMD 移动处理器 Ryzen AI 9 365 与焊接内存相结合,与去年相比有所降级。你最多可以获得 64 GB 内存,但之前型号的两个 SO-SIMM 插槽简直方便多了。与老款 Ryzen 9 8945HS 相比,CPU 性能只是略有提升。
新一代 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的 TGP 最高可达 115 瓦,总体性能完全没问题,但 8GB VRAM 的容量导致了一些限制,尤其是在 QHD 分辨率下。我们基本上建议坚持使用 1080p 分辨率,这样不会有太大问题。配备 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑的华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 的 1080p 游戏性能并没有好多少。在 QHD 分辨率下,你可以开始看到 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑的真正优势。
不过 配备 RTX 5070 Ti 的 G14 笔记本电脑价格要贵 1000 欧元左右,但性价比很高,建议零售价为 2399 欧元。配置较差的 Zephyrus G14 配有较慢的 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑、16 GB 内存和 Ryzen 9 270,售价已达 2299 欧元。如果您正在寻找一款具有良好 1080p 游戏性能的移动全能型产品,Blade 14 是一个不错的选择。
Pros
Cons
雷蛇更新了刀锋 14,并为其配备了更纤薄、更轻巧的机箱,就像我们在较大的 刀锋 16 2025.此外,还为 14 英寸的游戏玩家配备了全新的 OLED 屏幕,由 Nvidia 最新的移动 GPU 驱动。不过,RTX 5070 笔记本电脑(115 瓦)是最快的选择。处理器是 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365,搭配 32 GB 内存,但也可以选择 64 GB。我们的评测机配备了 1 TB 固态硬盘和 32 GB 内存,售价 2499 美元,因此比发布时的前代机型便宜了 200 美元。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 高品质,明显更小巧
黑色铝制机身和机盖上的发光 Razer 徽标等基本设计没有改变,但 2025 型号更薄(16.2 毫米,而 2024 Blade 14 为 18 毫米),重量也更轻(1.62 千克,而 2024 Blade 14 为 1.87 千克)。制造质量和稳定性都达到了很高的水平。我们既没有看到底座凹陷,也没有听到嘎吱嘎吱的声音。纤薄的盖子也保持得很好。总之,与竞争对手华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 相比,机箱质量略胜一筹,但铰链仍然是个问题。这里没有问题,最大开启角度为 135 度。唯一的问题是表面很容易留下指纹,你必须定期清洁。此外,还有白色(水银)可供选择。
新的 Blade 14 比 ROG Zephyrus G14 更小巧。 ROG Zephyrus G14相比,配备两种高端 GPU(5070 Ti 笔记本电脑/5080 笔记本电脑)的新款 Blade 14 更加小巧,但配备普通 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的 SKU 同样纤薄。不过,Zephyrus G14 的所有型号都稍轻一些。Razer 为 Blade 14 配备了紧凑型 200W GaN 电源,重量仅为 624 克。
连接 - USB 4 和快速读卡器
Blade 14 的端口情况令人信服。除了两个现代的 USB-C 4.0 端口(也可用于为笔记本电脑充电,最大功率可达 100 瓦),还有两个普通的 USB-A 端口,在实际使用中还是非常方便的。右侧的新型 microSD 读卡器速度非常快,与我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)结合使用时,传输速率超过 200 MB/s。Wi-Fi 模块(联发科 MT7925)支持 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中传输速率高且稳定。在测试期间,我们也没有遇到任何信号质量问题。1080p 网络摄像头可以正常工作,但照片效果不是特别好。Blade 14 是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑,支持微软的增强型人工智能功能(网络摄像头的工作室特效、实时字幕等)。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 204, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |

维护
底部面板由几颗螺丝(T5)固定,由于没有恼人的夹子,所以很容易拆卸。内部布局以冷却解决方案和电池为主。M.2-2280 固态硬盘和 Wi-Fi 模块可以更换,但内存现在是焊接的(与上一代产品相反)。 前代).这是令人遗憾的,因为 Zen 5 移动处理器可以配置可更换的内存。
可持续性
Razer 没有提供任何有关该设备的二氧化碳排放量、环保认证或使用可回收材料的信息。包装完全由纸板和纸张制成,可回收利用。
输入设备 - 按键照明键盘
显示屏 - Blade 14 现配备 120-Hz OLED 显示屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 361 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
89.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Razer Blade 14 2025 ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) BOE CQ NE145F8M-NY1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 165 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 Samsung SDC ATNA45AF02-2, OLED, 2880x1600, 14.5", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -22% | 0% | -3% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.5 | 99.6 0% | 65 -35% | 99.6 0% | 96.9 -3% | 99.9 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 95.3 -5% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.2 | 89.9 1% | 66.8 -25% | 89.9 1% | 85 -5% | 96.5 8% |
Response Times | -35% | -826% | -7% | -1067% | -47% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.59 ? | 0.62 ? -5% | 5.4 ? -815% | 0.62 ? -5% | 6 ? -917% | 0.79 ? -34% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.63 ? | 0.68 ? -8% | 5.9 ? -837% | 0.68 ? -8% | 8.3 ? -1217% | 1.01 ? -60% |
PWM Frequency | 960 ? | 960 ? | 960 ? | 240.5 ? | ||
PWM Amplitude * | 26 | 50 -92% | ||||
Screen | 36% | -21% | 36% | 6% | -28% | |
Brightness middle | 361 | 423 17% | 450 25% | 423 17% | 484.1 34% | 377.5 5% |
Brightness | 363 | 424 17% | 433 19% | 424 17% | 466 28% | 381 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 87 -11% | 98 0% | 89 -9% | 97 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.45 | 0.01 | 0.38 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 0.7 59% | 2.26 -33% | 0.7 59% | 2.23 -31% | 4.19 -146% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.9 | 1.8 54% | 7.5 -92% | 1.8 54% | 4.57 -17% | 7.02 -80% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 0.8 67% | 3.2 -33% | 0.8 67% | 1.6 33% | 1.2 50% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.214 99% | 2.18 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6571 99% | 6505 100% | 6121 106% | 6505 100% | 6816 95% | 6296 103% |
Contrast | 42300 | 1000 | 42300 | 1274 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 0.74 | 0.81 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
9% | -290% /
-167% | 10% /
18% | -355% /
-191% | -24% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.35 ms rise | |
↘ 0.28 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.32 ms rise | |
↘ 0.27 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz Amplitude: 26 % | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8363 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 不带可升级内存的 2025 Blade 14
新款 Blade 14 2025 仅配备 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365和焊接内存(LPDDR5x-8000)。配备 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑配备 16 或 32 GB 内存,配备 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑配备 32 或 64 GB 内存。
审查设置
Blade 14 配备了 Razer Synapse 软件,可进行全面的系统设置和性能配置文件(静音、平衡、性能、个人)。下表概述了这些配置文件,我们在评测中使用了 "性能"配置文件。使用电池供电时,只能使用平衡模式。
TDP | CB24 Multi | TGP | Time Spy Graphics | Cyberpunk 2077 QHD | max.功耗 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 45/35/30 瓦 | 833 分 | 60 瓦 | 10714 分 | 51.8 FPS | 42 dB(A) |
平衡型 | 50/45 瓦 | 998 分 | 95 瓦 | 13063 分 | 63.4 FPS | 50.3 dB(A) |
性能 | 70/60 瓦 | 1072 分 | 115 瓦 | 13734 分 | 65.9 FPS | 54.6 dB(A) |
电池(平衡) | 25 瓦 | 748 分 | 45 瓦 | 8511 分 | 35.6 FPS | 35.9 dB(A) |
处理器 - AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 有 10 个 Zen 5 内核,最高主频为 5 GHz。与 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370相比,ROG Zephyrus G14 的多核性能降低了约 15-20%。新的 Blade 14 也仅比旧的 Blade 14 2024 领先 5%,旧的 Blade 14 2024 配备了 Ryzen 9 8945HS在所有 CPU 基准测试中也仅领先旧版 Blade 14 2024 的 Ryzen 9 8945HS5%。在持续工作负载下性能稳定。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 -2! | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (331 - 2298, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (590 - 1112, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (102.7 - 116.3, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11462 - 20649, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1942 - 2001, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (5247 - 8070, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (758 - 787, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1950 - 3075, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (195.7 - 306, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (160 - 270, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47754 - 71722, n=7) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (5790 - 6062, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=140, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (12627 - 15137, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2778 - 2920, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=140, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9599 - 14182, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2062 - 2104, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (18.6 - 24.5, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (50.8 - 60, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (0.4091 - 0.4272, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (17096 - 32742, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (61976 - 126955, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2951 - 5178, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (85333 - 93045, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11586 - 16342, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (33409 - 67374, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47468 - 99502, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (706 - 1343, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9061 - 17848, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47654 - 53550, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
系统性能
不出所料,新款 Blade 14 的反应速度非常快,合成基准测试结果也非常好。不过,与竞争对手或旧机型相比,性能上并没有明显差异,因为性能水平非常接近。当系统通过 Advanced Optimus 切换到专用 GPU 时(例如启动游戏时),会有一点延迟,但这是正常现象。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=132, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=132, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=132, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=132, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=113, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=113, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=113, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=113, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (235 - 532, n=126, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=114, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=137, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7866 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (87648 - 94710, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (89012 - 104349, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (93627 - 106646, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (103.6 - 129.8, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的评测设备配备的是 1 TB 版本的三星 PM9A1,通过 PCIe 4.0 连接。M.2-2280 硬盘的传输速率整体上非常不错,在持续工作负载下性能也没有下降。初始设置后,您可以将 852 GB 用于自己的文件/应用程序。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
刀锋 14 使用专用的 英伟达GeForce RTX 5070 笔记本电脑GPU,它是 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的直接继承者。最大 TGP 为 115 瓦(100 瓦 + 15 瓦动态 Boost),因此 Blade 14 可以充分发挥新 GPU 的潜力。最大的缺点是内存容量有限,只有 8 GB。
在我们的合成基准测试中,新的 Blade 14 仅比上一代机型领先 5%,而 ROG Zephyrus G14则比配备 RTX 5070 Ti 的 ROG Zephyrus G14 快 14%(配备 RTX 5080 的则快 25%)。在持续工作负载下,GPU 性能完全稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试请参见 我们的技术部分.
3DMark 11 Performance | 34462 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 28328 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 13004 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 3030 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 14367 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 14241 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=140, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (19 - 20.8, n=4) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=140, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (31 - 35, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (211 - 367, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
合成基准是一回事,但实际游戏性能显然更有趣。新机型在这方面表现更好,与配备 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的旧版 Blade 14 相比,优势通常在 10-15% 之间。博德之门 3》是一个很大的例外,我们怀疑老款 Blade 14 可能存在性能差距过大的问题。我们将尽快核实这一结果。如果在 1080p 下运行,ROG Zephyrus G14 的两款性能更强的机型实际上只是稍快一些。夺宝奇兵》仅在 1080p 下以最低细节运行。当我们切换到中等预设(或更高)时,游戏会显示 VRAM 警告,并在按要求重启后反复崩溃。
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 166.5, n=116, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=124, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
两个更强大的 RTX 5000 Laptop GPU 可以在 QHD 分辨率下提高其领先优势。在一些游戏中,8 GB VRAM 的优势也非常明显。使命召唤:黑色行动 6》和《刺客信条:暗影》在我们的 QHD 设置下都显示了 VRAM 警告,而且出现了一些严重的掉帧现象,因此无法真正实现流畅的游戏。
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 120.5, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (58.3 - 66, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
F1 25 - 2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (10.6 - 36.8, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (9.17 - 10.6, n=2) |
Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High | |
Average of class Gaming (25 - 64, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (30 - 36, n=3) |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (60 - 127, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (68 - 75, n=2) |
我们使用《赛博朋克 2077》和《艾伦觉醒 2》这两款游戏的最高设置检查了 DLSS4 和多帧生成的新功能。我们建议您坚持使用全高清分辨率,这样可以获得不错的效果。在《赛博朋克》的 2560 x 1600 分辨率下,RTX 5070 笔记本电脑在 "多帧生成 "模式下被压得喘不过气来,实际效果更低。总而言之,RTX 5070 笔记本电脑是一款适合全高清游戏的 GPU。
设置 | 赛博朋克 2077 自由魅影 RT Overdrive |
Alan Wake 2 自定义 (Everything High/Ultra + PT) |
---|---|---|
自然 | 21.5 FPS | 26 FPS |
DLSS 质量 | 39.4 FPS | 39 FPS |
DLSS 性能 | 53.5 FPS | 51.5 FPS |
DLSS 质量 MFG x2 | 72.7 FPS | 60.5 FPS |
DLSS 质量 MFG x4 | 93.3 FPS | 129.3 FPS |
Setting | Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty RT Overdrive |
Alan Wake 2 Custom (Everything High/Ultra + PT) |
---|---|---|
自然 | 7.1 FPS | 17.5 FPS |
DLSS 质量 | 18.2 FPS | 22.1 FPS |
DLSS 性能 | 36.6 FPS | 32.3 FPS |
DLSS 质量 MFG x2 | 19.5 FPS | 47.5 FPS |
DLSS 质量 MFG x4 | 18.1 FPS | 75.4 FPS |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS-Diagramm
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 127.2 | 114.6 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 180.8 | 152.6 | 144.9 | 137.6 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 165.5 | 173.4 | 138.3 | 103.9 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 114.2 | 102 | 83.1 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 424 | 341 | 293 | 258 | 172.7 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 159.5 | 146 | 130.7 | 128.4 | 89.4 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 128.5 | 118.3 | 109.7 | 98.9 | 78.4 | 65.9 |
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 86.1 | 77.8 | 72.5 | 41 | ||
F1 24 (2024) | 229 | 86.6 | 53.5 | |||
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 155 | 144 | 107 | 98 | 75 | |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 138.7 | 0 | ||||
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 82 | 77 | 63 | 45 | 36 | |
F1 25 (2025) | 186.4 | 177.6 | 170.4 | 26.8 | 27.1 | 10.6 |
排放 - 冷却装置噪音大
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 27 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44.9 / 54.6 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Razer Blade 14 2025 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -11% | 3% | 4% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 23.7 | 23.3 2% | 24 -1% | 23.9 -1% | 24.3 -3% | 22.8 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.7 | 29.1 -23% | 29 -22% | 23.9 -1% | 25 -5% | 22.8 4% |
Idle Average * | 23.7 | 29.1 -23% | 31 -31% | 23.9 -1% | 25 -5% | 27.3 -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 29.1 -8% | 36 -33% | 23.9 11% | 25 7% | 30.7 -14% |
Load Average * | 44.9 | 54.4 -21% | 47 -5% | 46.2 -3% | 33 27% | 41.6 7% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 54.6 | 54.4 -0% | 50 8% | |||
Load Maximum * | 54.6 | 54.4 -0% | 52 5% | 46.2 15% | 51.9 5% | 52.6 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.2 | 49.5 | 52.8 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.4 °C / -13.3 F).
Razer Blade 14 2025 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | -12% | 6% | -3% | 6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 51.2 -9% | 57 -21% | 46.6 1% | 41.8 11% | 40.4 14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.6 | 50.3 -1% | 55 -11% | 47.8 4% | 42.2 15% | 49.4 -0% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.8 | 30.2 -1% | 32 -7% | 26.7 10% | 34.8 -17% | 28.2 5% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.7 | 30.9 -1% | 33 -7% | 27.8 9% | 37.4 -22% | 29.8 3% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Razer 采用了由六个模块组成的音响系统,但音质再次令人有些失望。声音缺乏一些冲击力,而且 华硕 ROG Zepyhrus G14在这方面更胜一筹。
Razer Blade 14 2025 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能量管理 - 增强耐力
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 2880x1600, 14.5" | Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | -8% | 21% | -88% | 3% | -11% | -65% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.3 | 6.7 28% | 6 35% | 6.9 26% | 20.9 -125% | 7.3 22% | 8.68 ? 7% | 14.2 ? -53% |
Idle Average * | 11.1 | 8.8 21% | 11 1% | 8.6 23% | 25.6 -131% | 9.6 14% | 12.7 ? -14% | 20.1 ? -81% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.2 | 9.3 17% | 21 -88% | 9 20% | 32.1 -187% | 17.3 -54% | 15 ? -34% | 27.3 ? -144% |
Load Average * | 91.9 | 121.5 -32% | 93 -1% | 75.2 18% | 72.7 21% | 76.6 17% | 100.8 ? -10% | 107.5 ? -17% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 171.5 | 157.4 8% | 147.9 14% | |||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 168.6 | 155.5 8% | 146.3 13% | |||||
Load Maximum * | 195 | 218.1 -12% | 252 -29% | 161.6 17% | 228.4 -17% | 160.9 17% | 202 ? -4% | 257 ? -32% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 109.7 | 182.1 | 152 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption external screen
电池运行时间
Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 72 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 73 Wh | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73.6 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 23% | 8% | 2% | -10% | -2% | -12% | |
H.264 | 656 | 898 37% | 555 -15% | 725 11% | 458 ? -30% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 534 | 627 17% | 519 -3% | 555 4% | 428 -20% | 448 -16% | 384 ? -28% |
Load | 71 | 81 14% | 100 41% | 64 -10% | 72 1% | 80 13% | 86.1 ? 21% |
笔记本检查评级
Razer Blade 14 2025
- 06/23/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Razer Blade 14 2025 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $39.99 GKLSPL 230W Blade Laptop Cha... 2. $42.99 GKLSPL 230W Blade Laptop Cha... 3. $118.99 330W Razer Blade 18 Gaming L... List Price: 2399€ | 1.6 kg | 16.2 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,859.99 ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 Latest... 2. $2,899.00 ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 Latest... 3. $3,049.00 HIDevolution [2025] ASUS ROG... List Price: 3399€ | 1.6 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,449.00 List Price: 2100 Euro | 1.9 kg | 20.9 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI IPS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $59.99 180W 20V 9A Charger ADP-180T... 2. $79.99 180W Charger for Asus ROG Ze... 3. $59.99 Hodeay 180W Rectangle Conn C... List Price: 2499€ | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,499.99 List Price: 2700 USD | 1.9 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $49.91 Original New for Lenovo Legi... 2. $199.99 POBRIDA 14.5" New OLED Scree... 3. $88.88 Lenovo Legion Laptop Charger... List Price: 1500 USD | 1.7 kg | 20.79 mm | 14.50" 2880x1600 227 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.