判决
Nitro 18 AI 是一款不错的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，测试版本配备 Ryzen AI 7 350 和GeForce RTX 5070，几乎没有明显的弱点。例如，缓慢的读卡器和高延迟只会影响部分用户。在性能和 Turbo 系统模式下，这款中端机型的噪音非常大，这也是可以忍受的，因为在平衡模式下，风扇的噪音明显降低，而 CPU 和 GPU 的速度几乎没有下降。
从积极的一面来看，键盘上别致的 RGB 灯光和相当强劲的 90 Wh 电池值得一提。同时，两个 SO-DIMM 插槽和 M.2-2280 插槽（其中一个还是空闲的）会让升级爱好者感到满意。在其他许多方面，这款 18 英寸机型都处于中游水平，或者说并没有脱颖而出，无论是机箱、音响系统、IPS 显示屏、连接还是输入设备，都很扎实。
Nitro 18 AI 的主要竞争对手是华硕电脑 TUF Gaming A18和 ROG Strix G18和微星巨无霸 Crosshair 18 HX和 Vector A18 HX.
Pros
+ 两个内存和固态硬盘插槽
+ 良好的系统性能
+ RGB 灯光
+ 更强劲的电池
Cons
- 较高性能模式声音较大
- 蹩脚的读卡器
- 糟糕的延迟
价格和供应情况
经过测试的宏碁 Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V 笔记本电脑配备 Ryzen AI 7 350 和GeForce RTX 5070，在各大在线商店（如Computeruniverse）的售价约为 1,800 欧元（约合 2092 美元）。
规格
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V
Processor
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 8c/16t, 4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5, 4 x 3.5 GHz AMD Zen 5c, 125 W PL2 / Short Burst, 75 W PL1 / Sustained, Krackan Point (Zen 5)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2075 MHz, RAM: 1481 MHz, 115 W TDP, GDDR7, ForceWare 595.71, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, DDR5-5600, two SO-DIMM slots (one empty)
Display
18.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 168 PPI, BOEhydis NE180QDM-NY1, IPS, QHD+, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-1T00-1006, 1000 GB
, NVMe-SSD, two M.2 2280 slots (one empty)
Weight
2.99 kg, Power Supply: 734 g
Price
1900 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
住房
在外壳方面还可以做得更好一些。虽然这款 18 英寸的跑车在长途旅行中具有极佳的稳定性，但高质量的金属表面却让人望而却步。设计既不简单，也不特别有趣，只有底部的一些元素比较引人注目（见照片）。铰链工作可靠，最大开启角度略低于 150°。Nitro 18 AI 的重量为 3.0 千克（约合 6.6 磅），在重量介于 2.6 至 3.5 千克（约合 5.7 至 7.7 磅）之间的同类产品中算是比较舒适的。整体高度甚至略低于竞争对手。
设备
虽然买家不得不放弃 Thunderbolt，但机上至少有一个 USB 4 端口。总的来说，这款 18 英寸笔记本电脑提供了两个 Type-C 端口和三个 Type-A 端口，这已经足够了。此外，还有一个音频插座、一个 HDMI 输出、一个 microSD 读卡器、一个 RJ45 LAN 端口和一个 Kensington 锁开口。
来自联发科的无线模块（Wi-Fi 6E）在接收方面表现尤为出色。由于采用了全高清分辨率，网络摄像头的清晰度比许多其他游戏笔记本电脑要高一些，但仍然算不上令人印象深刻。要进入内部结构，必须卸下 10 颗十字螺丝。我们的图片展示了它的内部结构。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (20 - 210, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.5 - 261, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
交流
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø633 (538-731)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1737 (1595-1865)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (607-761)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1746 (1671-1824)
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1322 (1213-1428)
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1693 (1526-1737)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1713 (873-1762)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø685 (511-802)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1714 (1645-1732)
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1498 (1300-1640)
网络摄像头
6.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
维护
输入设备
输入设备非常出色。键盘布局合理、方向箭头布局合理、RGB 照明功能强大，这些都为键盘加分不少。键盘反馈采用的是常见的橡胶圆顶设计，因此可以更加坚固。
触摸板的尺寸非常大，约为 15 x 9 厘米（约 5.9 x 3.5 英寸），即使对于 18 英寸的设备来说也是如此。表面相对光滑，但我们希望点击面能提供更好或更精确的反馈。
显示屏
显示屏给人留下了可用的印象。288 cd/m² 的平均亮度对于户外使用来说有点低，但几乎没有用户会将 18 英寸机型拖到户外。竞争对手在这方面的表现仍然更好，在某些情况下可以达到 500 cd/m²以上。另一方面，约 1,130:1 的对比度也并不离谱。全 sRGB 和 DCI-P3 覆盖范围也令人印象深刻，不过在交付状态下的色彩准确度较差。响应时间和视角基于典型的 IPS 水平。宏碁规定频率为 165 Hz，分辨率为清晰的 2,560 x 1,600 像素（16:10 格式）。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOEhydis NE180QDM-NY1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 288.1 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 317 cd/m²
Contrast: 1132:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.16 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.75}
calibrated: 2.42
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 7.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
84.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
97.2% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.093
CCT: 6553 K
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V BOEhydis NE180QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 165 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W NE180WUM-NY3 (BOE0CEF), IPS, 1920x1200, 18", 144 Hz | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW BOE NE180QDM-NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 NE180QDM-NZC, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -17% | 1% | 2% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 97.2 | 69.3 -29% | 98 1% | 99.4 2% | 98.1 1% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 98.1 -2% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 84.8 | 67.9 -20% | 86.1 2% | 87.7 3% | 86.3 2% |
| Response Times | -15% | 11% | 41% | 26% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 6.8 ? | 8 ? -18% | 4.7 ? 31% | 3.8 ? 44% | 4.3 ? 37% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 9.4 ? | 10.4 ? -11% | 10.3 ? -10% | 5.8 ? 38% | 8.1 ? 14% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| Screen | -84% | -82% | 4% | -62% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 317 | 351 11% | 581.4 83% | 582 84% | 543 71% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 288 | 332 15% | 534 85% | 557 93% | 502 74% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 89 2% | 84 -3% | 93 7% | 86 -1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.28 | 0.26 7% | 0.46 -64% | 0.4 -43% | 0.56 -100% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1132 | 1350 19% | 1264 12% | 1455 29% | 970 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.16 | 2.89 44% | 3.89 25% | 1.4 73% | 3.41 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 0.75 | 7.91 -955% | 7.94 -959% | 3.4 -353% | 6.4 -753% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.42 | 0.93 62% | 0.97 60% | 0.7 71% | 0.66 73% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.4 | 4.46 40% | 5.6 24% | 1.8 76% | 3.4 54% |
| Gamma | 2.093 105% | 2.46 89% | 2.1 105% | 2.24 98% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6553 99% | 7132 91% | 6835 95% | 6633 98% | 6070 107% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -39% /
-60% | -23% /
-51% | 16% /
9% | -12% /
-36% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7996 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
Nitro 18 AI 有多种配置可供选择，这些配置不仅在内存和固态硬盘方面有所不同，而且在 CPU (Ryzen AI 5 340到 Ryzen AI 9 365)和 GPU (RTX 5050至 RTX 5070 Ti)不同。价格也相应不同。
测试条件
NitroSense 工具包含四种不同的运行模式，从静音到涡轮增压。我们的测量（除电池测试外）是在性能模式下进行的。
| 模式 | 静音 | 平衡 | 性能 | 涡轮增压 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 36 dB(A) | 42 dB(A) | 54 dB(A) | 59 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》帧速率（FHD/超高清） | 91.6 fps | 97.1 fps | 101.3 fps | 105.5 fps |
| GPU 功耗 | ~85 W | ~95 W | ~105 W | ~110 W |
| CPU PL1 | 45 W | 65 W | 75 W | 95 W |
| CPU PL2 | 125 W | 125 W | 125 W | 125 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 2410 分 | 2615 分 | 2693 分 | 2707 分 |
处理器
虽然 Ryzen AI 7 350(8 核、16 线程）无法与更昂贵的型号相媲美 Core Ultra 9 275HX和 Ryzen 9 9955HX的竞争，与旧款 Ryzen 7 260Zen 5 芯片仍然是一款性能稳定的处理器，对大多数用户来说都绰绰有余。
Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2673 (2657.81-2693.97)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2738 (2693.06-2765.87)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5222 (5148.67-5245.9)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX: Ø5642 (5588.93-5904.93)
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX: Ø6020 (5962.14-6091.99)
CPU Performance rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10227 - 85542, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (20203 - 28112, n=16) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (51376 - 238426, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (75098 - 110301, n=16) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2180 - 9817, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (3395 - 4399, n=16) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (67317 - 77400, n=16) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (11916 - 13856, n=16) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25115 - 128721, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (39456 - 59540, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (56915 - 87670, n=16) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (663 - 1140, n=16) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5509 - 45446, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (10707 - 15222, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (25170 - 47405, n=16) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V (v6.92.6600) | |
系统性能
尽管 CPU 性能并不尽如人意，但 Nitro 18 AI 的系统性能之高，丝毫不逊于 18 英寸的同类产品。只有内存表现相对较差。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V -1! | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (7717 - 8986, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5828 - 10060, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (10496 - 11793, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 12600, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (10416 - 15127, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 16716, n=111, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7505 - 19351, n=111, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (9858 - 12404, n=3) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1719 - 1858, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1635 - 1732, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1956 - 2077, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1357 - 1642, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (288 - 336, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=111, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (246 - 277, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (431 - 470, n=2) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8986 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (37823 - 106997, n=16) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 108104, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (43921 - 63650, n=16) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (42576 - 110817, n=16) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 259, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87.7 - 109.8, n=16) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
我们对 Nitro 18 AI 的陡峭延迟感到有些惊讶--从负面意义上说，它在延迟方面更胜一筹。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
事实证明，内置的 1 TB 西部数据固态硬盘在速度和长期性能方面都不尽如人意。
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-1T00-1006
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6225 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5259 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
690.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
487.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3439 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3534 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
67.27 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
134.1 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-1T00-1006; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5993 (3990.87-6047.98)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W SK hynix HFS001TEM9X174N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5395 (4573.97-6611.06)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6762 (5259.83-6887.53)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6938 (3860.48-7268.31)
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7310 (5948-7339.4)
图形处理器性能
由于测试设备中使用的GeForce RTX 5070 只能使用 8GB 显存，因此它更多地属于中端而非高端产品。在基准测试过程中，Blackwell 芯片达到了预期的性能水平，115 瓦的最大 TGP 几乎耗尽。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 34028 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 63527 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 30468 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12923 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏性能方面也没有任何惊喜；在使用更高分辨率和设置时，RTX 5070 的成绩在正常范围内。虽然 GPU 并不总是有足够的能力在原生 QHD 范围内实现最大细节，但通常可以实现较高的设置（即使并不总是在 60 帧以上）。
如果想获得更高的帧率，还可以使用升频等功能。包括 DLSS Balanced 在内，《黑色行动 7》的性能 黑色行动 7中的性能从 24 帧/秒提高到 45 帧/秒（QHD、极端预设、光线追踪）。在四倍帧生成的情况下，甚至达到了 121 fps。这些数值在实际体验中的流畅程度因玩家而异。
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 174.8 | 168.8 | 117.3 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 149.9 | 129.3 | 122.1 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 99.5 | 82.5 | |||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 133 | 117.1 | 115.4 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 128.9 | 115.1 | 101.3 | ||
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 57.9 | 51.1 | 27.8 | 7.97 | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 87.3 | 79.4 | 47.1 | 30.4 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 151.8 | 121.8 | 83.4 | 59.5 | |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 99 | 76.6 | 39.3 | 27.5 | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 (2025) | 150 | 119 | 40 | 24 | |
| Resident Evil Requiem (2026) | 103.5 | 98.4 | 52.5 | 26.6 |
Resident Evil Requiem | Call of Duty Black Ops 7 | Anno 117: Pax Romana | ARC Raiders | The Outer Worlds 2 | Borderlands 4
| Resident Evil Requiem | |
| 1920x1080 Max Settings + High Ray Tracing (no upscaling) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (n=1last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Max Settings + High Ray Tracing (no upscaling) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (n=1last 2 years) | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme Preset + Raytracing | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (40 - 44, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average of class Gaming (24 - 60, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Extreme Preset + Raytracing | |
| Average of class Gaming (18 - 39, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (24 - 28, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| ARC Raiders | |
| 1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Raytracing AA:TSR | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (43.5 - 83.4, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Epic Preset + Epic Raytracing AA:TSR | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (47.8 - 59.5, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (26.4 - 49.9, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21.5 - 33.4, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Borderlands 4 | |
| 1920x1080 Badass Preset AA:FX | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (27.4 - 27.8, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (16 - 54, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Badass Preset AA:FX | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.97 - 37.1, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø96.5 (91.1-98.1)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø87.2 (83.1-88.5)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø96.3 (91-97.6)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø94.6 (90.2-96.9)
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop: Ø122.6 (117.3-125.5)
排放量
噪音排放
在使用性能模式时，宏碁 Nitro 18 AI 的声音相当大（尽管是液态金属）。赛博朋克 2077》中的 54 分贝（A）是与微星 Crosshair 18 HX 一起测试的最高值。风扇通常在空闲状态下保持激活状态，但 28 至 31 dB(A) 仍可接受。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 28 / 29 / 31 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 49 / 56 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 20% | 8% | 8% | 4% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 23 4% | 23.1 4% | 24.6 -3% | 22.5 6% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 28 | 23 18% | 27.3 2% | 24.6 12% | 26 7% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 29 | 23 21% | 27.3 6% | 30 -3% | 26 10% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 31 | 23 26% | 27.6 11% | 30 3% | 32 -3% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 49 | 32.58 34% | 30.1 39% | 34.4 30% | 44.4 9% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 54 | 45.13 16% | 54.4 -1% | 49.7 8% | 49.8 8% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 56 | 58.6 -5% | 49.7 11% | 61.6 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下，顶部尤其会发热。最高温度为 44 °C（111.2 °F），而外壳底部的最高温度为 57 °C（134.6 °F）。凭借这些数值，18 英寸机型在竞争中遥遥领先。同时，在空闲模式下，竞争对手之间几乎没有差异。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+2.8 °C / 5 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+2.8 °C / 5 F).
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | 9% | 6% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 44 | 39 11% | 40.2 9% | 42.8 3% | 46.6 -6% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 57 | 41 28% | 44 23% | 43.1 24% | 45.6 20% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 25 | 27 -8% | 25.6 -2% | 26.8 -7% | 31.2 -25% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28 | 29 -4% | 26.8 4% | 26.6 5% | 28.6 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
GeForce RTX 5070 在使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 工具完成压力测试时的温度约为 74 °C（165.2 °F），而 Ryzen AI 7 350 的平均温度仅为 67 °C（152.6 °F）左右。
发言人
内置 2.0 系统的音质还算合格，不过低音不足也是常有的事。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.53 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
Nitro 18 AI 的功耗表现良好。空闲模式下 6 至 17 瓦，负载模式下 89 至 210 瓦，低于大多数竞争对手，这主要是由于 CPU 较弱。在测试中，只有 TUF Gaming A18 被证明具有类似的经济性。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle | 5.9 / 9.6 / 17 Watt |
| Load |
89 / 210 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -52% | -53% | -170% | -34% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.9 | 6.7 -14% | 8.8 -49% | 13.1 -122% | 20.8 -253% | 10.7 ? -81% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 9.6 | 11.6 -21% | 14.1 -47% | 20.6 -115% | 52.8 -450% | 15.3 ? -59% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 17 | 17.7 -4% | 35.4 -108% | 21.1 -24% | 54.5 -221% | 20.2 ? -19% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 89 | 85 4% | 106.2 -19% | 123.4 -39% | 146.6 -65% | 97.5 ? -10% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 160.4 | 144 10% | 233 -45% | 215 -34% | 285 -78% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 154.6 | 139 10% | 225 -46% | 179.2 -16% | 278 -80% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 210 | 187 11% | 322.3 -53% | 249.7 -19% | 297.3 -42% | 216 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
能耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø175.5 (169.4-210)
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.61 (5.94-17)
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø160.4 (155.6-164.6)
带外部监控器的能耗
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø109.7 (108.6-131.6)
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø112.9 (108.3-134.4)
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø127.8 (125.9-131.2)
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11.1 (6.04-20.1)
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø154.6 (150.3-159.3)
电池寿命
适中的能耗和充足的电池容量（90 瓦时）确保了可观的运行时间。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，亮度降低到 150 cd/m²，这款 18 英寸机型的续航时间超过 11 小时。
| Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 5% | -4% | -37% | -66% | -40% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 11.3 | 11.9 5% | 10.9 -4% | 7.1 -37% | 3.8 -66% | 6.73 ? -40% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 7 | 8.99 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
尽管 Nitro 18 AI 是一款出色的 18 英寸游戏机，但它最终还是不足以摘得这一细分市场的桂冠。微星 微星 Vector A18 HX和华硕 TUF Gaming A18和 ROG Strix G18的整体表现都更好。宏碁 Nitro 的最终得分与 微星 Crosshair 18 HX.
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V
- 03/06/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.2%  | Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61-R10V AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1900 EUR | 3 kg | 25 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
2. 83.8%  | Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2199 Euro | 2.6 kg | 26.7 mm | 18.00" 1920x1200 126 PPI IPS |
3. 81.7%  | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1700 USD | 3.1 kg | 29.9 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
4. 86.4%  | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 2299€ | 2.9 kg | 30.8 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
5. 84.8%  | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | List Price: 3200 USD | 3.5 kg | 32.05 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
