判决
虽然评测版配备全高清显示屏、酷睿 i7-14700HX、16 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘和 Windows 11 Home 系统，售价不到 1500 美元，但 LOQ 17IRX10 仍是基于 RTX 5070 的笔记本电脑中价格较为实惠的一款。
因此，我们不能像某些竞争对手那样对它寄予厚望，但联想还是做得不错的--虽然有一两处不足之处。显卡的良好性能尤其值得称赞。得益于内置的 GPU 超频功能，RTX 5070 的性能高于平均水平。在积极的一面，我们还拥有两个内存和固态硬盘插槽用于未来升级、相对较好的输入设备和防污表面。
除此之外，这款手机的外壳还可以做得更好。塑料材料的质感不是特别好，而且容易发出嘎嘎的响声。联想还可以改进显示屏亮度、端口分布和电池容量。与大多数游戏笔记本电脑一样，LOQ 17 在 3D 模式下（至少在性能模式下）也会变得相当吵闹。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
配备酷睿 i7-14700HX 和GeForce RTX 5070 的联想 LOQ 17IRX10 售价约为 1500 美元。
- $1,299.00Lenovo LOQ RTX 5050 AI-Gaming PC, 17.3" FHD 165Hz, Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, 32GB DDR5 RAM, 2TB SSD, Backlit KB, Bundle with PCO Notebook Folding Radiator, Laptop Cooler
- $1,699.00Lenovo LOQ 17.3 RTX 5060 AI Gaming Laptop, 17.3 FHD 165Hz, Intel i7-13650HX (Beats Intel i9-12900), NVIDIA RTX 5060, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB SSD, RGB Backlit KB, RJ-45, Bundle with PCO Laptop Cooler
竞争对手包括目前配备 Nvidia Blackwell 芯片的其他游戏笔记本电脑，如 惠普 Omen 16(RTX 5060)、 技嘉游戏 A16、以及 微星 Crosshair A17 HX（均为 RTX 5070）或 申克 XMG Focus 17(RTX 5070 Ti) 都作为对比设备出现在表格中。
规格
案例
由于颜色相对较浅（月光灰），机箱给人留下了深刻的印象，玩家也会喜欢键盘上的 RGB 灯光。该产品的制造质量和稳定性几乎没有可抱怨的地方，表面一般只在强力压力下才松动。一个亮点是 180° 的显示器开合角度，这可不是每天都能看到的。
LOQ 17 的重量为 2.9 千克，与 17 英寸的同类产品相当。不过，16 英寸设备的重量往往在 2 千克范围内，这使它们明显更轻。在高度方面，17 英寸机型处于同类产品的中间位置（不含脚垫约为 2.5 厘米），非常舒适。
特点
港口
我们对端口的布局感到有些困惑。虽然背板提供了足够多的端口（如三个 USB-A 端口），但左侧仍然是空的。五个 USB 端口中，只有一个是 Type-C。此外，买家还将不得不放弃读卡器。
交流
另一个弱点是 Wi-Fi 性能。尽管采用了相当先进的芯片（Wi-Fi 6），LOQ17 在续航测试中（尤其是传输时）的表现却很一般。在整个测试过程中，我们还经常遇到连接中断的情况，不过这可能是评测样品的普遍问题。
网络摄像头
虽然 500 万像素网络摄像头的表现要好得多，但你也不要指望它能创造奇迹。图像清晰度至少比大多数竞争对手要好。
配件
笔记本电脑附带了一些信息宣传单和一个中等大小的 245 瓦电源。
维护
只有先卸下机箱底部的 10 颗小十字螺丝，才能接触到内部组件。尽管安装的固态硬盘只是 M.2 2242 型，但如果需要，两个插槽都可以容纳普通的 2280 固态硬盘。
可持续性
而并行审查的 Legion 9 18IAX10则使用了大量塑料材料。
保修
在德国，17 英寸机型提供两年保修。
输入设备
键盘
尽管这款键盘的性能无法与机械键盘相提并论，但总体而言，它的键入体验还是非常扎实的。精心设计的布局值得特别表扬，这并不总是必然的，尤其是在游戏领域。许多竞争对手也可以从大小适中的方向键中学到一些东西。此外，全尺寸数字键盘也起到了补充作用，尽管空间充足，但其按键比主键盘上的按键要窄一些。集成背光没有其他联想游戏键盘（如Legion 9 18）那么强烈，但仍可调节到多个级别。
触摸板
触摸板位于机身左侧，尺寸为 12 x 7.5 厘米，大小适中。触摸板的功能（滑动特性、精确度、手势）大多不显眼，这意味着它既不差也不特别好。在实际使用中，唯一让我们感到困扰的是点击表面的手感和声音有些轻飘飘的。
显示屏
与同价位的产品一样，该机的屏幕采用了哑光 IPS 面板，但分辨率为 1,920 x 1,080 像素，对于一款 17 英寸设备来说，分辨率并不清晰。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 315 cd/m²
Contrast: 1086:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.38 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 0.96
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
68.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
66.3% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.052
CCT: 6319 K
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 N173HME-G31 (CMN174C), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 165 Hz | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AUODBB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H NE160QDM-NYJ (BOE0C80), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -41% | 4% | 24% | 25% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 66.3 | 40 -40% | 69.4 5% | 97.1 46% | 98.3 48% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 97.5 | 58.1 -40% | 99.5 2% | 99.9 2% | 99.9 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 68.4 | 38.7 -43% | 71.6 5% | 84.9 24% | 86 26% |
| Response Times | -83% | 21% | 31% | 20% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 16 ? | 27.6 ? -73% | 14.3 ? 11% | 13.3 ? 17% | 13.7 ? 14% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 10.1 ? | 19.4 ? -92% | 7 ? 31% | 5.7 ? 44% | 7.6 ? 25% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| Screen | -83% | -34% | -0% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 315 | 328 4% | 432 37% | 471 50% | 347 10% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 297 | 313 5% | 425 43% | 468 58% | 325 9% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 91 5% | 91 5% | 96 10% | 84 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.29 | 0.26 10% | 0.37 -28% | 0.4 -38% | 0.26 10% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1086 | 1262 16% | 1168 8% | 1178 8% | 1335 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.38 | 4.73 -99% | 4.76 -100% | 2.72 -14% | 3.3 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.66 | 17.47 -377% | 8.59 -135% | 5.49 -50% | 8.4 -130% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.96 | 4.22 -340% | 1.18 -23% | 1.12 -17% | 0.9 6% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 2.05 29% | 6.2 -114% | 3.2 -10% | 4.5 -55% |
| Gamma | 2.052 107% | 2.63 84% | 2.079 106% | 2.227 99% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6319 103% | 6718 97% | 6690 97% | 6925 94% | 7365 88% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -69% /
-74% | -3% /
-18% | 18% /
9% | 9% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
不过，正如我们即将在游戏基准测试中看到的那样，这个像素数对于 RTX 5070 来说非常理想。对比度略高于 1,000:1，与 0.29 cd/m² 的黑阶一样，都在正常范围内。
在亮度较高的环境中，亮度还有待提高。它的亮度略低于 300 cd/m²，在测试中排名最后，色彩空间也差不多。LOQ 17 几乎覆盖了 100%的 sRGB 色彩空间，但在 AdobeRGB 和 DCI-P3 色彩空间方面却有所欠缺，这可能会影响到专业用户，但对许多游戏玩家来说可能并不会造成困扰。
开箱即用，色彩准确度已达到很好的水平，响应时间也不错。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8169 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
性能一章以一系列系统截图开始。
测试条件
LOQ 17 的运行模式可以通过组合键（Fn + Q）或Legion 软件进行更改。我们的测量（电池测试除外）是在性能模式下进行的，包括 GPU 超频。
| 模式 | 静音 | 平衡 | 性能 + GPU OC |
| 赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 42 dB(A) | 49 dB(A) | 55 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》性能（FHD/超高清） | 55.7fps | 89.7fps | 100fps |
| 赛博朋克 2077》GPU 功耗 | ~45 W | ~75 W | ~100 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 2,974 分 | 4,054 分 | 4,354 分 |
| CPU PL1 | 25 W | 70 W | 90 W |
| CPU PL2 | 65 W | 125 W | 162 W |
处理器
如果忽略并不完全一致的 Cinebench 循环性能，那么 酷睿 i7-14700HX的性能非常出色。不过，与 Ryzen 9 8940HX微星 Crosshair A17 HX 的 Ryzen 9 8940HX 相比，LOQ 17 根本不占优势（后者的 CPU 性能平均要快 14%）。
Cinebench R15 多重持续测试
| CPU Performance rating - Percent | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (16932 - 23676, n=8) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (86338 - 116556, n=8) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (4008 - 5567, n=8) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (129836 - 152200, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (11704 - 14434, n=8) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (42125 - 58380, n=8) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (82161 - 113157, n=8) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (1177 - 1682, n=8) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (9029 - 12928, n=8) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (24276 - 49671, n=8) | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
系统性能
系统性能符合预期，17 英寸机型在对比设备中再次处于中上水平。
PCMark 10: Essentials
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=108, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (41617 - 78742, n=8) | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (46627 - 86175, n=8) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (39155 - 76689, n=8) | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (82.7 - 96.4, n=8) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latenices
通常情况下，延迟证明并不完美。LatencyMon 工具会指出某些应用场景中的潜在问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
评测配置采用的是 Western Digital 1 TB SSD，从 NVMe 的角度来看，其性能尚可，但在循环测试中，速度在一段时间后会出现下降和波动（见表）。
* ... smaller is better
持续读取性能：DiskSpd 循环读取，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
如前所述，联想的超频让 GPU 受益匪浅。根据GPU-Z工具，启用超频后，RTX 5070的时钟速度提高了约10%，这有助于LOQ 17在合成基准测试和游戏测试中取得高于平均水平的成绩。在 3DMark 中，这款 17 英寸笔记本电脑甚至在 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑中遥遥领先，尽管 RTX 5070 Ti 仍有 20% 的优势。
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 -1! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng -1! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 37532 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 65067 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 32559 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 13683 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 169.9, n=138, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (82.4 - 109.4, n=17) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (102.5 - 160.2, n=15) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (96 - 150.7, n=14) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=124, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (203 - 259, n=12) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=139, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (123.2 - 184.2, n=15) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 181.8 | 176.2 | 135.4 | |||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 192.4 | 183.4 | 167.2 | |||||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 172.8 | 137.7 | ||||||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 135 | 113.8 | ||||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 332 | 277 | 254 | |||||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 134.3 | 112.9 | 108 | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 112.6 | 108 | 100 | |||||
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 98.5 | 82.1 | 81 | |||||
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 97.4 | 91 | 75.8 | |||||
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 70 | 53.5 | ||||||
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 58.6 | 53.5 | 47.5 | |||||
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 73.1 | 70.5 | 68.1 | |||||
| Until Dawn (2024) | 100.7 | 75.9 | 59 | |||||
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 68.3 | 59.3 | 50.4 | |||||
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 52.3 | 42.5 | 27.4 | |||||
| Battlefield 6 (2025) | 141 | 130.3 | 111.2 | 77.8 | 64.7 | 51.2 | 18 | 13.2 |
| Stalker 2 - 1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (39.9 - 147.6, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (45.7 - 50.4, n=3) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Until Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (41.3 - 104, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (48.8 - 61.8, n=3) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Space Marine 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (58.9 - 108, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (58.9 - 97.3, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Star Wars Outlaws - 1920x1080 cinem. ultra | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Average of class Gaming (29.1 - 71.6, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (47.5 - 50.3, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (35.1 - 86.1, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (46.3 - 53.5, n=3) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Ghost of Tsushima - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (64.9 - 75.8, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (28.5 - 108.1, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Horizon Forbidden West - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (73.2 - 81, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (14.7 - 140.3, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
在与 赛博朋克 2077》的长期测试中没有发现任何异常，帧频也相当稳定。
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
排放量
噪音排放
噪音水平与竞争对手大致相当。在《赛博朋克 2077》中测得的 55 分贝（A）噪音让人想起技嘉 Gaming A16、微星 Crosshair A17 HX 和 XMG Focus 17，而 Omen 16 在负载情况下则更安静一些。在空闲模式下，风扇的平均噪音为 26 dB(A)，总体上比较舒适。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25 / 26 / 32 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 56 / 56 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 i9-13900HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 9% | 3% | -10% | 3% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 23 4% | 24 -0% | 24 -0% | 24.8 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25 | 23 8% | 25 -0% | 25 -0% | 24.8 1% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 26 | 23 12% | 26 -0% | 30 -15% | 24.8 5% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 32 | 27.64 14% | 27 16% | 47 -47% | 27.7 13% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 56 | 49.5 12% | 54 4% | 57 -2% | 51 9% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 55 | 49.5 10% | 54 2% | 57 -4% | 56.2 -2% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 56 | 52.73 6% | 55 2% | 58 -4% | 56.2 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
怠速温度也不高，大部分时间都保持在 30°C 以下。在 3D 模式下，机箱温度最高可达 45°C（顶部）和 49°C（底部），仍在可接受范围内。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 i9-13900HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 12% | -8% | -14% | 6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 45 | 36 20% | 50 -11% | 51 -13% | 41.2 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 49 | 37 24% | 49 -0% | 49 -0% | 48.8 -0% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 32 | 30 6% | 35 -9% | 40 -25% | 27.6 14% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 31 | 32 -3% | 34 -10% | 36 -16% | 30.1 3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，处理器的发热温度约为 74 °C，属于中等水平，而显卡的发热温度约为 82 °C。
发言人
从我们的音频分析中可以看出，扬声器有时明显弱于技嘉 Gaming A16 中安装的扬声器。音质只能满足中档性能的需求。
Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
尽管 CPU 的 PL1/PL2 级别很高，GPU 也超频了，但功耗仍然保持一致。虽然我们在空闲模式下测得的功耗为 14 至 28 瓦，但在负载情况下，功耗介于 158 瓦（3DMark 06 平均值）和 232 瓦（最大压力测试）之间。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.5 Watt |
| Idle | 14.4 / 17.2 / 28 Watt |
| Load |
158 / 232 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 i9-13900HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 25% | 34% | -45% | -0% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 14.4 | 7.8 46% | 9 37% | 32 -122% | 12 17% | 14.2 ? 1% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 17.2 | 8.8 49% | 11 36% | 36 -109% | 17.5 -2% | 20.3 ? -18% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 28 | 21.5 23% | 23 18% | 47 -68% | 18.1 35% | 27.3 ? 2% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 158 | 119 25% | 91 42% | 132 16% | 121.1 23% | 111.9 ? 29% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 199.3 | 164.5 17% | 130 35% | 216 -8% | 244 -22% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 203 | 192 5% | 132.5 35% | 222 -9% | 255 -26% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 232 | 208 10% | 155 33% | 261 -13% | 292.1 -26% | 263 ? -13% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外接显示器的功耗
电池寿命
LOQ 17 的电池容量为 60 Wh，并不算特别强大，尤其是考虑到竞争对手的电池容量（70 到 90 Wh）。因此，这款 17 英寸设备在 Wi-Fi 测试中排名最后也就不足为奇了。对于一款具有图形切换功能的设备来说，3 小时左右的时间实在太少了。
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 60 Wh | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 Wh | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 i9-13900HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 73 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 61% | 148% | 42% | 87% | 112% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 3.1 | 5 61% | 7.7 148% | 4.4 42% | 5.8 87% | 6.57 ? 112% |
| H.264 (h) | 5.1 | 7.78 ? | ||||
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.414 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
除了 GPU 性能得益于 OC 选项之外，联想的 LOQ 17 在任何类别中都没有达到顶级或峰值性能。不过，作为一款配备 RTX 5070 的游戏笔记本电脑，它的性价比还是比较高的。
Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10
- 10/10/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 79.8%  | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 Intel Core i7-14700HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,279.00 Lenovo LOQ RTX 5050 Pro AI-G... 2. $1,299.00 Lenovo LOQ RTX 5050 AI-Gamin... 3. $1,699.00 Lenovo LOQ 17.3 RTX 5060 AI ... List Price: 1500 EUR | 2.9 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
2. 86.6%  | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1650 USD | 2 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
3. 79.6%  | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $39.99 SLRIOYS 240W 200W Charger Co... 2. $12.99 Rujcloud HDMI 2.1 Cable for ... 3. $1,599.99 MSI Crosshair A16 HX 16" QHD... List Price: 2000 EUR | 2.9 kg | 29.7 mm | 17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS |
4. 86.2%  | SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 2100€ | 2.1 kg | 23 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
5. 82.5%  | SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25 Intel Core i9-13900HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 500 GB NVMe | List Price: 1990€ | 2.8 kg | 28.5 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
