XMG Core 16 M25 评测 - 配备 300 Hz 显示屏和 RTX 5070 的 AMD 游戏笔记本电脑

Name: SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25
Brand: SCHENKER

游戏卧底？

XMG Core 16 M25 是一款中端游戏笔记本电脑，可轻松用作办公设备。它的 300 Hz 显示屏由 AMD Zen 5 处理器和全新的GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU 驱动，最高支持 128 GB 内存。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/08/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Blackwell RTX 5000 Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows Zen 5

结论 - XMG 酷睿 16 是一款可靠的中端游戏笔记本电脑

XMG Core 16 (M25) 是一款出色的 16 英寸游戏机，设计低调而专业。如果您打算将笔记本电脑用于工作和娱乐，这款产品是您的理想之选，因为铝制机身在任何办公环境中都不会显得突兀。散热风扇在日常使用中也非常安静。Zen 5 芯片和 RTX 5070 GPU 性能强劲，而且该笔记本在内存和存储方面具有出色的灵活性。

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

没有严重的缺陷。虽然你不得不放弃 Wi-Fi 7 和高级 Optimus，但这款笔记本电脑提供了丰富的端口（包括 USB 4）、舒适的键盘和适合游戏和工作的高质量 IPS 显示屏。此外，电池续航时间也相当不错。

Pros

+ 高品质、低调的铝制机箱

+ 强大的系统性能

+ 良好的维护选项

+ 舒适的键盘

+ 300 Hz 显示屏，色彩准确

+ 电池寿命长

+ 充足的连接

+ 紧凑型碳化硅电源

Cons

- 负载情况下机箱温度过高

- 无高级 Optimus

- 无 Wi-Fi 7

价格和供应情况

新型 XMG Core 16 M25 可从 Bestware 订购，起价为 1,579 欧元（约合 1,842 美元）。

译者注：申克公司的设备尚未在北美正式发售。

结论 - XMG 酷睿 16 是一款可靠的中端游戏笔记本电脑
规格
箱子和设备
输入设备
显示屏 - IPS，300 Hz & FreeSync
性能 - 禅 5 和布莱克韦尔
排放量
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

XMG 推出的新款酷睿 16（M25）是一款经济实惠的中端游戏笔记本电脑，配备 300 Hz 快速 IPS 显示屏，采用 AMD CPU 和英伟达（NVIDIA）新款 RTX 5000 GPU。基本售价为 1,579 欧元，我们测试的是配备了 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 37064 GB 内存、2 TB SSD 和 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑 GPU价格约为 2100 欧元（不含操作系统）。

规格

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25

Processor

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 12 x 2 - 5.1 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)

Graphics adapter

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2775 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 115 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 581.29, Optimus + MUX Switch

Memory

64 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 128 GB

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, MNG007DA6-4, IPS, glossy: no, 300 Hz, Adaptive Sync

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, 2048 GB

, 1751 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB4 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC

Networking

Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 23 x 357 x 254

Battery

99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p w/ IR + shutter
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 250W SiC PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.149 kg, Power Supply: 619 g

Price

2100 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

箱子和设备

从外观上看，XMG Core 16 M25 采用了内敛的黑色哑光表面设计，看起来就像 XMG Neo 16 M25 的纤薄版。 XMG Neo 16.铝制机身的制造质量和刚性都非常出色，不过表面容易沾染指纹和污渍。显示屏最大可打开 180 度，在任何角度都能保持稳定。维护选项非常丰富：两个内存插槽、两个固态硬盘插槽、无线局域网模块和电池均可由用户更换。

WLAN 模块支持 Wi-Fi 6E，传输速度快。1080p 网络摄像头（带红外传感器和机械快门）可捕捉清晰的图像，笔记本电脑还提供丰富的连接选项，包括 USB 4 和读卡器。

尺寸比较

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH DIN A4 ❌

左：千兆以太网、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（10 GBit/s、通过 iGPU 传输 DisplayPort 1.4a、100W Power Delivery）、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 GBit/s）、3.5 mm 音频

右：2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 GBit/s）、SD 读卡器、Kensington 纳米安全锁

后部USB-C 4.0（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort 2.1（通过 iGPU、140W Power Delivery）、电源装置、Mini-DisplayPort 2.1（通过 dGPU、DP40/UHBR10、VRR/G-Sync）、HDMI 2.1（通过 dGPU、48 GBit/s、HDCP 2.3、VRR/G-Sync）

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	143 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	142 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (20 - 210, n=67, last 2 years)	117 MB/s -18%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	260.6 MB/s +30%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	201 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=65, last 2 years)	148.4 MB/s -26%

Networking
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1565 (min: 1414) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1671 (min: 1650) MBit/s ∼97%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1767 (min: 1659) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1713 (min: 1692) MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	798 (min: 633) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	911 (min: 868) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1360 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1487 (min: 1455) MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1363 (min: 1248) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1555 (min: 875) MBit/s ∼90%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1644 (min: 1469) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1585 (min: 1529) MBit/s ∼92%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1795 (min: 1676) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1719 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼100%

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1565 (1414-1648)

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1670 (1650-1699)

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25: 6.36 ∆E min: 1.09 - max: 11.19 ∆E

输入设备

键盘与较小的酷睿 15 采用的键盘相同，在这里也表现出色。它具有大按键、专用数字键盘、四级亮度的每个按键 RGB 背光和舒适的键入感。大尺寸点击板（12.3 x 7.7 厘米）提供了流畅的滑动和精确的跟踪，不过下部区域的机械点击声有点大。

显示屏 - IPS，300 Hz & FreeSync

16 英寸雾面 IPS 屏幕提供了出色的图像质量，即使是明亮的内容也不会出现颗粒感。分辨率为 2,560 × 1,600 像素，由于刷新率为 300 Hz（支持 FreeSync），响应速度快，运动看起来非常流畅。没有 PWM 闪烁。

出厂时提供了 P3 和 sRGB 色彩配置文件，不过两个 P3 预置可能更好一些。校准后，显示器的色彩准确度明显提高，非常适合在 P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间中进行图像和视频编辑。平均亮度达到约 480 cd/m²，对比度约为 1,200:1。


478 cd/m²	479 cd/m²	468 cd/m²
478 cd/m²	512 cd/m²	469 cd/m²
484 cd/m²	497 cd/m²	480 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

MNG007DA6-4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 512 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 482.8 cd/m² Minimum: 25.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 512 cd/m²
Contrast: 1191:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
88.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
CCT: 6534 K

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 MNG007DA6-4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP MNG007DA5-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 LG Philips 160WQG, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H NE160QDM-NYJ (BOE0C80), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) NE160QDM-NZL, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH MNG007DA5-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz
Display		-17%	-0%	-16%	-13%	-18%
Display P3 Coverage (%)	98.8	69.4 -30%	96.9 -2%	69.4 -30%	74.7 -24%	68.7 -30%
sRGB Coverage (%)	100	97.2 -3%	99.8 0%	99.5 0%	99.8 0%	96.1 -4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)	88.4	71.9 -19%	89.7 1%	71.6 -19%	75.4 -15%	71.2 -19%
Response Times		22%	-9%	-39%	-4%	-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	10.7 ?(4.5, 6.2)	6.3 ?(2.8, 3.5) 41%	4.3 ?(1.9, 2.4) 60%	14.3 ?(6.8, 7.5) -34%	10.5 ?(3.4, 7.1) 2%	12 ?(5.7, 6.3) -12%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	4.9 ?(1.6, 3.3)	4.8 ?(1.7, 3.1) 2%	8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1) -78%	7 ?(2.3, 4.7) -43%	5.4 ?(1.4, 4) -10%	5.6 ?(2.1, 3.5) -14%
PWM Frequency (Hz)
Screen		15%	-18%	-41%	3%	6%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	512	480 -6%	493.2 -4%	432 -16%	538 5%	395 -23%
Brightness (cd/m²)	483	456 -6%	477 -1%	425 -12%	508 5%	398 -18%
Brightness Distribution (%)	91	91 0%	93 2%	91 0%	88 -3%	97 7%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.43	0.32 26%	0.5 -16%	0.37 14%	0.47 -9%	0.32 26%
Contrast (:1)	1191	1500 26%	986 -17%	1168 -2%	1145 -4%	1234 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.4	1.4 42%	3.57 -49%	4.76 -98%	1.9 21%	1.3 46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.8	2.5 34%	7.03 -85%	8.59 -126%	4 -5%	2.8 26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.9	1.3 -44%	0.68 24%	1.18 -31%		1.4 -56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.1	1.2 61%	3.7 -19%	6.2 -100%	2.7 13%	1.8 42%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.16 ^102%	2.16 ^102%	2.079 ^106%	2.24 ^98%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6534 ^99%	6620 ^98%	5876 ^111%	6690 ^97%	7027 ^93%	6842 ^95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / 9%	-9% / -13%	-32% / -36%	-5% / -2%	-8% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.6 ms rise
4.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.5 ms rise
10.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8211 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能 - 禅 5 和布莱克韦尔

测试条件

XMG 提供不同的能源配置文件，我们在 "超频-正常"模式下进行了基准测试。此外还有 "超频-极致 "模式，但这并没有进一步提高性能。在合成测试中，我们从 GPU 中获得的最大功率为 100 瓦，但在游戏时则高达 115 瓦。

能源概况	CPU TDP	CB R24 Multi	GPU TGP	Time Spy Graphics	CP 2077 QHD Ultra	max.风扇容量
平衡型	60/45 瓦	1,189 点	80 瓦	10,708 点	57.1 FPS	39.8 dB(A)
发烧级	65/54 瓦	1,253 分	80 瓦	11,586 分	57.3 FPS	46.4 dB(A)
超增压正常	95/70 瓦	1,299 分	100-115 瓦	13,198 分	65.1 FPS	49.2 dB(A)
超增压极限	95 瓦	1,337 分	100-115 瓦	13,272 分	65.2 FPS	54.9 dB(A)
电池（发烧友）	45/40 瓦	1,117 分	50 瓦	9,397 分	44.7 FPS	42 分贝(A)

处理器

餈 AMD Ryzen HX 9 HX 370是一款配备 Zen 5 内核的快速移动处理器，性能保持稳定，但无法与英特尔的 HX 处理器相媲美。你还可以清楚地看到，该芯片的 TDP 值高于 70 瓦时，几乎无法获益。

Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3503 (3290.01-3542.96)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2740 (2520.16-2768.93)

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5073 (4910.99-5571.03)

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2234 (2213.12-2280.89)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5384 (5315.61-5570.25)

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2388 (2369.95-2431.91)

CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance rating
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	87.9 pt
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	85.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	69 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	66.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	64.4 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	57.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	56.5 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	50.9 pt

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2057 Points +58%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	1931 Points +49%
Average of class Gaming (331 - 2298, n=94, last 2 years)	1437 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1299 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (621 - 1299, n=30)	1078 Points -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	990 Points -24%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	917 Points -29%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	824 Points -37%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	138 Points +17%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	133.8 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138.2, n=95, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	118.4 Points
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	117.7 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (113.6 - 121, n=20)	116.9 Points -1%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	109 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	104.6 Points -12%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	36437 Points +64%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	35478 (31087^min - 35478^max) Points +60%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=139, last 2 years)	25145 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	22187 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23902, n=29)	20619 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	17865 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	17277 Points -22%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	15318 Points -31%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2246 Points +11%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2193 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2019 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1921 - 2049, n=22)	2011 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=139, last 2 years)	1979 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	1966 Points -3%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	1833 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	1760 Points -13%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14347 Points +69%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	13953 Points +64%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=138, last 2 years)	9677 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	8504 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6449 - 9280, n=21)	8404 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	6770 Points -20%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	6738 Points -21%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	5896 Points -31%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	861 Points +8%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	846 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	795 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (753 - 804, n=21)	789 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	770 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=138, last 2 years)	763 Points -4%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	705 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	679 Points -15%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5571 (4910.99^min - 5571.03^max) Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5570 (5315.61^min - 5570.25^max) Points +57%
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=138, last 2 years)	3892 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3543 (3290.01^min - 3542.96^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3551, n=21)	3248 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	2769 (2520.16^min - 2768.93^max) Points -22%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	2432 (2369.95^min - 2431.91^max) Points -31%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	2281 (2213.12^min - 2280.89^max) Points -36%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	335 Points +77%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	328 Points +74%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (188.8 - 315, n=21)	295 Points +56%
Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=137, last 2 years)	292 Points +55%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	275 Points +46%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	259 Points +37%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	204 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	188.8 Points

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	217 Seconds * -56%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	182 Seconds * -31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	182 Seconds * -31%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (139 - 192, n=22)	154.9 Seconds * -11%
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=134, last 2 years)	153.7 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	139 Seconds *
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	99 Seconds * +29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	92 Seconds * +34%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	117523 MIPS +39%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	107286 MIPS +27%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=136, last 2 years)	91572 MIPS +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	84735 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (66154 - 84735, n=21)	78686 MIPS -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	72400 MIPS -15%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	59347 MIPS -30%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	57536 MIPS -32%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	7039 MIPS +9%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6587 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6487 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=136, last 2 years)	6398 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (5859 - 6497, n=21)	6174 MIPS -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	6101 MIPS -6%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	6049 MIPS -7%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	5825 MIPS -10%

Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	20349 Points +25%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	19270 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	16311 Points
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=136, last 2 years)	15602 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11973 - 16311, n=23)	14641 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	14025 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	13299 Points -18%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	10889 Points -33%

Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3111 Points +6%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3081 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2930 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2780 - 2965, n=23)	2886 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	2863 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3253, n=136, last 2 years)	2782 Points -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	2673 Points -9%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	2498 Points -15%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	23856 Points +46%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	21530 Points +32%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=135, last 2 years)	16743 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	16322 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11394 - 16322, n=22)	14281 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	12426 Points -24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	12239 Points -25%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	10255 Points -37%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2252 Points +8%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2243 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	2115 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2175, n=22)	2087 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2076 Points
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=135, last 2 years)	2004 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	1954 Points -6%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	1785 Points -14%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	39.5 fps +39%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	37.3 fps +31%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	28.4 fps
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=136, last 2 years)	27.1 fps -5%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 28.7, n=21)	25.4 fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	22.5 fps -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	21.4 fps -25%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	16.8 fps -41%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	57.1 s * -10%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	55.5 s * -7%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	53.9 s * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (46.8 - 66.6, n=21)	53.7 s * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	52.1 s *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	49.1 s * +6%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=135, last 2 years)	47.4 s * +9%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	38.6 s * +26%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	0.4545 sec * -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	0.4479 sec * -13%
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=137, last 2 years)	0.4279 sec * -8%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4208 sec * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.3892 - 0.529, n=21)	0.4132 sec * -4%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	0.4089 sec * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4049 sec * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.3974 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3543 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

231 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

188.8 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

8504 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

795 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2019 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

22187 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

118.4 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1299 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance rating
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	95.5 pt
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	90.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	87.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	78.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	77.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	71.3 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	65.7 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	39.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	37403 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	34660 KRay/s -7%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37804, n=20)	33870 KRay/s -9%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	32561 KRay/s -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	28399 KRay/s -24%
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=135, last 2 years)	28247 KRay/s -24%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	27546 KRay/s -26%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	12864 KRay/s -66%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	175476 Points +22%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	165095 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	143992 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (95655 - 147937, n=21)	130667 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=135, last 2 years)	127273 Points -12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	117226 Points -19%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	106890 Points -26%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	66256 Points -54%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	8502 MB/s +43%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	7975 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	5932 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=135, last 2 years)	5851 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5932, n=21)	5473 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	5002 MB/s -16%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	4322 MB/s -27%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	2697 MB/s -55%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	134492 Points +42%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	130726 Points +38%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=135, last 2 years)	119756 Points +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	119010 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	94793 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (41744 - 99232, n=21)	85271 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	76919 Points -19%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	76463 Points -19%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	19120 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19120, n=21)	18427 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	15283 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=135, last 2 years)	14477 Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	14115 Points -26%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	13624 Points -29%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	13428 Points -30%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	8190 Points -57%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	91394 Points +18%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	84624 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	77421 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (50357 - 93798, n=20)	70026 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=135, last 2 years)	65591 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	63212 Points -18%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	57591 Points -26%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	31902 Points -59%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	129264 MB/s +9%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	123278 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	118993 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=135, last 2 years)	109784 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	90394 MB/s -24%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67015 - 118993, n=21)	85536 MB/s -28%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	84817 MB/s -29%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	55809 MB/s -53%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	2010 MB/s +32%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1928 MB/s +27%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=135, last 2 years)	1533 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1518 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1077 - 1530, n=21)	1403 MB/s -8%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1138 MB/s -25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1039 MB/s -32%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	804 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	20295 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	18545 KRay/s -9%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13665 - 20648, n=21)	18418 KRay/s -9%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	17429 KRay/s -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	15351 KRay/s -24%
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=135, last 2 years)	15113 KRay/s -26%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	14944 KRay/s -26%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	6926 KRay/s -66%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	52164 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	51695 MPixel/s
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	49214 MPixel/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (36752 - 51727, n=21)	48161 MPixel/s -7%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	43885 MPixel/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=135, last 2 years)	43125 MPixel/s -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	39936 MPixel/s -23%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	19421 MPixel/s -62%

系统性能

在日常使用中，Core 16 的运行速度非常快，我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题。唯一的小插曲是 PCMark 10 基准测试反复崩溃，这很可能是当前的 Nvidia GPU 驱动程序造成的。

Performance rating: Percent
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total

Performance rating
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	88.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	85.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	80.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	77.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	75.3 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	70.8 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	68.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	63.5 pt

CrossMark / Overall
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	2269 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2193 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	2028 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=108, last 2 years)	1989 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1897 - 2028, n=2)	1963 Points -3%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1816 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1752 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1712 Points -16%

CrossMark / Productivity
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	2173 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2029 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=108, last 2 years)	1867 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1820 Points
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1781 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1718 - 1820, n=2)	1769 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1664 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1648 Points -9%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2531 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	2455 Points
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	2415 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (2259 - 2455, n=2)	2357 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=108, last 2 years)	2222 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1959 Points -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1879 Points -23%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1847 Points -25%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	2143 Points +36%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1830 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1799 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=108, last 2 years)	1739 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1581 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1516 - 1581, n=2)	1549 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1461 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1454 Points -8%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	364 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	360 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	352 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (326 - 352, n=2)	339 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	336 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=110, last 2 years)	316 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	297 Points -16%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	271 Points -23%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	345 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	341 Points -1%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	330 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (275 - 345, n=2)	310 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=107, last 2 years)	283 Points -18%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	277 Points -20%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	260 Points -25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	239 Points -31%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	562 ms * -35%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	521 ms * -25%
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=121, last 2 years)	473 ms * -14%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	431 ms * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (416 - 444, n=2)	430 ms * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	416.4 ms *
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	410 ms * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	405 ms * +3%

* ... smaller is better

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	85889 MB/s +16%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (72702 - 93640, n=21)	85213 MB/s +15%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	77444 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	73841 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	73142 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=135, last 2 years)	71215 MB/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	67750 MB/s -8%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	31629 MB/s -57%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	97040 MB/s +14%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84635 - 102937, n=21)	95664 MB/s +13%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	85905 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	84797 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=135, last 2 years)	74042 MB/s -13%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	62290 MB/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	61170 MB/s -28%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	35115 MB/s -59%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (80685 - 108954, n=21)	96252 MB/s +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	86401 MB/s +6%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	86056 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	84566 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	81836 MB/s
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	78747 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=135, last 2 years)	72770 MB/s -11%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	30611 MB/s -63%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	116 ns * -34%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	105.8 ns * -22%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	103.2 ns * -19%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (86.7 - 119.4, n=21)	101.7 ns * -17%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=135, last 2 years)	101.7 ns * -17%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	97.2 ns * -12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	93.8 ns * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	86.7 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4219 μs * -596%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2123.1 μs * -250%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	2079.4 μs * -243%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1758.4 μs * -190%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	606 μs *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	563.8 μs * +7%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7125 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6871 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 500 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 518 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 169.4 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 595 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 798 MB/s

Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	75.5 pt
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	73 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	68.9 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	67.5 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	67.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	63.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	60.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	47.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5359 (5332.25^min - 5358.62^max) MB/s +64%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	4792 (4766.73^min - 4792.47^max) MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming (281 - 8300, n=119, last 2 years)	3508 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3275 (3228.94^min - 3275.33^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (2985 - 3449, n=4)	3258 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2508 (1821.45^min - 2508^max) MB/s -23%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2429 (2393.52^min - 2428.5^max) MB/s -26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1717 (1605.72^min - 1717.49^max) MB/s -48%
seq write
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	5593 (3454.43^min - 5593.31^max) MB/s +50%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3727 - 5099, n=4)	4255 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	4147 (3521.83^min - 4147.33^max) MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 9699, n=119, last 2 years)	3993 MB/s +7%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3905 (2240.1^min - 3904.64^max) MB/s +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	3830 (3464.7^min - 3830.45^max) MB/s +3%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3756 (3683.41^min - 3756.04^max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3727 (3443.1^min - 3727.06^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	12505 (9384.86^min - 12505.3^max) MB/s +89%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	7030 (6368.69^min - 7030.49^max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (2644 - 15056, n=119, last 2 years)	6908 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6600 (5848.07^min - 6599.74^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (5761 - 7102, n=4)	6455 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	6365 (5802.54^min - 6364.58^max) MB/s -4%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4821 (4294.34^min - 4820.52^max) MB/s -27%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4749 (4322.02^min - 4748.79^max) MB/s -28%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	7451 (4926^min - 7450.54^max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6933 (6921.65^min - 6932.56^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (6801 - 6947, n=4)	6873 MB/s -1%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	6529 (6230.01^min - 6528.8^max) MB/s -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	5576 (5054.3^min - 5575.91^max) MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming (1281 - 13519, n=119, last 2 years)	5508 MB/s -21%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3915 (3898.36^min - 3915.17^max) MB/s -44%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3873 (3818.91^min - 3872.62^max) MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	95.8 (94.49^min - 95.77^max) MB/s +60%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	77.6 (25.64^min - 77.6^max) MB/s +30%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	73 (72.21^min - 73.01^max) MB/s +22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	71.9 (71.68^min - 71.87^max) MB/s +20%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (59.7 - 80.7, n=4)	71 MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming (32.2 - 110.2, n=119, last 2 years)	69 MB/s +16%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	66.5 (65.03^min - 66.52^max) MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	59.7 (58.18^min - 59.68^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	345 (334.89^min - 345.07^max) MB/s +210%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	333 (326.87^min - 332.75^max) MB/s +199%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	255 (218.03^min - 254.91^max) MB/s +129%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=119, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +90%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (111.3 - 352, n=4)	195.1 MB/s +75%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	156.5 (155.62^min - 156.47^max) MB/s +41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	143.8 (140.01^min - 143.77^max) MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	111.3 (110.29^min - 111.32^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	4034 (4021.16^min - 4033.83^max) MB/s +300%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2919 (2877.27^min - 2918.5^max) MB/s +189%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2793 (2764.32^min - 2793.37^max) MB/s +177%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 8067, n=119, last 2 years)	2530 MB/s +151%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (1009 - 5735, n=4)	2206 MB/s +119%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1036 (949.61^min - 1035.55^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1009 (886.13^min - 1008.75^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	979 (909.81^min - 979^max) MB/s -3%
4k q32 t16 write
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	3899 (3811.51^min - 3899.28^max) MB/s +740%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3730 (3655.4^min - 3730.3^max) MB/s +704%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3060 (3036.18^min - 3059.66^max) MB/s +559%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 5653, n=119, last 2 years)	2084 MB/s +349%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (464 - 4869, n=4)	1589 MB/s +242%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	563 (543.32^min - 563.01^max) MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	464 (459.68^min - 464.25^max) MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	455 (405.09^min - 455.15^max) MB/s -2%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	8609 Points +40%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7681 Points +25%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (6169 - 10745, n=4)	7545 Points +22%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7205 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (2858 - 13854, n=117, last 2 years)	6878 Points +11%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	6345 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6169 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	4498 Points -27%
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2867 Points +113%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2727 Points +103%
Average of class Gaming (953 - 4418, n=117, last 2 years)	2352 Points +75%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (1345 - 3980, n=4)	2103 Points +56%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1964 Points +46%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	1894 Points +41%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1345 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1333 Points -1%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5809 Points +39%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4177 - 4734, n=4)	4394 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4177 Points
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3573 Points -14%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	3554 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (1375 - 7208, n=117, last 2 years)	3381 Points -19%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2888 Points -31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	2553 Points -39%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9199 MB/s +66%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	5548 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (2272 - 9890, n=117, last 2 years)	5259 MB/s -5%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	5151.36 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4336 - 5548, n=4)	5121 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	4346 MB/s -22%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4042 MB/s -27%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4036.28 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5793 MB/s +36%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3714 - 5119, n=4)	4328 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4263 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (114.5 - 9926, n=117, last 2 years)	3937 MB/s -8%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3558 MB/s -17%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3474.09 MB/s -19%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	3282.92 MB/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	2619 MB/s -39%
4K Read
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	90.83 MB/s +16%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	86.83 MB/s +11%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	82.1 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	78.5 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (64.2 - 78.7, n=4)	74.8 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 108.4, n=117, last 2 years)	68.4 MB/s -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	66.2 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	49.2 MB/s -37%
4K Write
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	294.61 MB/s +40%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	275.03 MB/s +30%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (192.8 - 307, n=4)	232 MB/s +10%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	227 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	226 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (75.6 - 512, n=117, last 2 years)	218 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	211 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	156.3 MB/s -26%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2381 MB/s +235%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2232.85 MB/s +214%
Average of class Gaming (517 - 3630, n=117, last 2 years)	1759 MB/s +147%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (711 - 3395, n=4)	1515 MB/s +113%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	1291.89 MB/s +82%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	995 MB/s +40%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	832 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	711 MB/s
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5004 MB/s +41%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3540 - 3915, n=4)	3729 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3540 MB/s
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2950.37 MB/s -17%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	2930.89 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming (991 - 5909, n=117, last 2 years)	2773 MB/s -22%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2305 MB/s -35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	2134 MB/s -40%
Access Time Read
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.066 ms * -288%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=117, last 2 years)	0.05682 ms * -234%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	0.054 ms * -218%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	0.045 ms * -165%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.036 ms * -112%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (0.017 - 0.052, n=4)	0.02925 ms * -72%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	0.017 ms *
Access Time Write
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	0.087 ms * -383%
Average of class Gaming (0.012 - 0.277, n=117, last 2 years)	0.03893 ms * -116%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.032 ms * -78%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.031 ms * -72%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	0.03 ms * -67%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	0.018 ms *
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (0.013 - 0.02, n=4)	0.01725 ms * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.016 ms * +11%

* ... smaller is better

连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6298 (5916.9-6327.74)

图形处理器性能

酷睿 16（M25）配备了 GeForce RTX 5070 笔记本电脑(100W + 15W Dynamic Boost）。图形切换通过 Nvidia Optimus 处理，并包含一个 MUX 开关，不过禁用集成 GPU 需要重启。总体而言，在合成基准测试和游戏测试中，GPU 性能都很强劲。

3DMark Performance rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	100 pt
Average of class Gaming	83 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	82.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	78.5 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	76.9 pt
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	76.7 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	72.1 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	69.5 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	59337 Points +29%
Average of class Gaming (13523 - 76300, n=130, last 2 years)	48571 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	46464 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	45994 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (40285 - 46464, n=12)	43868 Points -5%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	42223 Points -8%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	41019 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	40285 Points -12%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	44575 Points +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	37193 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	36337 Points
Average of class Gaming (2913 - 62849, n=146, last 2 years)	35681 Points -2%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	35646 Points -2%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (31345 - 37331, n=14)	35272 Points -3%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	33771 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	31345 Points -14%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	17239 Points +31%
Average of class Gaming (2295 - 25763, n=141, last 2 years)	14998 Points +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	14771 Points +12%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	13976 Points +6%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (11969 - 14771, n=14)	13367 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13198 Points
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	12119 Points -8%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	11969 Points -9%

3DMark 11 Performance		36818 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		30433 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		12918 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	22 Seconds *
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	21 Seconds * +5%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	20.8 Seconds * +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	20 Seconds * +9%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (17 - 22, n=12)	19.4 Seconds * +12%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=133, last 2 years)	19.2 Seconds * +13%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	18 Seconds * +18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14.1 Seconds * +36%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	36 Seconds *
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	35 Seconds * +3%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	34 Seconds * +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	33.1 Seconds * +8%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (30 - 36, n=12)	32.3 Seconds * +10%
Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=134, last 2 years)	31.8 Seconds * +12%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	30 Seconds * +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	25.3 Seconds * +30%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	372 Seconds * -76%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	323 Seconds * -53%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	292 Seconds * -38%
Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=133, last 2 years)	260 Seconds * -23%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (137 - 372, n=10)	249 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	211 Seconds *
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	158 Seconds * +25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	147 Seconds * +30%

* ... smaller is better

Performance rating - Percent
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	94.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	92.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	86 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	81.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	79.6 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	74.3 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	71.4 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	129.9 (107.4^min) fps +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	109.4 (88.6^min) fps +15%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	102.9 (84.7^min, 80.8^P1) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 168, n=136, last 2 years)	99.9 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	94.8 (76.7^min) fps
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	90.1 (73.4^min) fps -5%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	82.4 (56^min) fps -13%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	157 fps +29%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	140.8 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=101, last 2 years)	134.5 fps +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	127.5 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	121.9 fps
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	109.4 fps -10%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	103.5 (42^min, 54.2^P0.1, 81.7^P1) fps -15%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	161 fps +20%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	156.4 (3.01^min, 100^P1) fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	134.1 (4.88^min, 90.9^P1) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	124.8 (4.67^min, 90.9^P1) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=123, last 2 years)	123.9 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	111.8 (3.87^min, 83.3^P1) fps -17%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	102.5 (29.8^min, 66.7^P1) fps -24%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	150.7 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	147.8 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	142.3 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	139.9 fps
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=134, last 2 years)	136.1 fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	119.5 fps -15%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	96 fps -31%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=122, last 2 years)	261 fps +1%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	259 (107.2^min, 194.8^P1) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	258 (130.8^min, 195.1^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	234 (141.3^min, 180^P1) fps -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	219 (128^min, 164.3^P1) fps -15%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	203 (108.3^min, 150.5^P1) fps -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	136.4 (91.5^min, 97.9^P1) fps -47%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	184 (156.1^min) fps +36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	174.8 (148.4^min) fps +29%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=137, last 2 years)	154.4 fps +14%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	148.7 (124.4^min) fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	135.1 (115.7^min) fps
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	131.9 (113.9^min) fps -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	123.2 (104.7^min) fps -9%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	117.5 fps +34%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	116.1 fps +33%
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 150.2, n=140, last 2 years)	104 fps +19%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	99.4 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	87.5 fps
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	83.7 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	80.7 fps -8%

赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø91.8 (88-93.4)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD DLSS	QHD
GTA V (2015)				134.1		120.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	174.2	174.4	145.3	135.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	209	180.4	139.9			101.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	111.8	108.3	87.5
Strange Brigade (2018)	450	346	291	258		172.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	171.3	142.5	124.8	121.9		85.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	130.8	121.2	104.6	94.8	76.7	65.1
F1 24 (2024)		238	231	88	79.2	53.4

排放量

系统噪音

散热系统整体表现良好，即使在超增压-正常模式下，轻度工作时也几乎听不到两个风扇的声音。在游戏和压力测试中，我们记录到的最大噪音值为 49.2 dB(A)，使酷睿 16 成为对比组中最安静的笔记本电脑。一旦负载降低，风扇转速会迅速回落。没有检测到其他电子噪音。

Noise level

Idle		24.8 / 24.8 / 27.1 dB(A)
Load		40.2 / 49.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
Noise		-14%	4%	-8%	-2%	5%
off / environment * (dB)	24.8	25.1 -1%	23.7 4%	24 3%	23.3 6%	23.9 4%
Idle Minimum * (dB)	24.8	32.2 -30%	23.9 4%	25 -1%	25 -1%	23.9 4%
Idle Average * (dB)	24.8	32.2 -30%	23.9 4%	26 -5%	25 -1%	23.9 4%
Idle Maximum * (dB)	27.1	32.2 -19%	26.1 4%	27 -0%	25 8%	23.9 12%
Load Average * (dB)	40.2	38.1 5%	26.8 33%	54 -34%	45.5 -13%	33.2 17%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)	49.2	53.9 -10%	51.8 -5%	54 -10%	53.3 -8%	50.2 -2%
Load Maximum * (dB)	49.2	57.1 -16%	58 -18%	55 -12%	53.3 -8%	50.2 -2%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常使用中，机箱保持凉爽宜人，但在重负载情况下，我们测得机箱底部多个区域的温度超过 50 °C，最高温度达到 58 °C。在这种情况下，最好不要把笔记本电脑放在膝盖上。在压力测试中，处理器的功耗为 45 W，温度约为 80 °C，而 GPU 的功耗为 100 W，温度约为 85 °C。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


45.1 °C	46.7 °C	44 °C
40.6 °C	44.5 °C	40.1 °C
27.3 °C	30.8 °C	29.7 °C

Maximum: 46.7 °C
Average: 38.8 °C


54.4 °C	58.5 °C	52.1 °C
52.9 °C	56.9 °C	49.6 °C
30.2 °C	31.2 °C	30.9 °C

Maximum: 58.5 °C
Average: 46.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


28.2 °C	28.3 °C	28.1 °C
27.6 °C	28.3 °C	27.9 °C
26.7 °C	26.7 °C	26.9 °C

Maximum: 28.3 °C
Average: 27.6 °C


29 °C	29.8 °C	28.6 °C
29.6 °C	29.9 °C	28.5 °C
27.2 °C	27.4 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 29.9 °C
Average: 28.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


44.8 °C	47 °C	44.2 °C
40.4 °C	45 °C	40.9 °C
28.8 °C	31.1 °C	30.1 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 39.1 °C


54.9 °C	59.1 °C	52.4 °C
52.9 °C	57.1 °C	48.4 °C
31 °C	31.7 °C	30.7 °C

Maximum: 59.1 °C
Average: 46.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.5 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
Heat		16%	4%	-7%	-188%	8%
Maximum Upper Side * (°C)	46.7	39.5 15%	51 -9%	50 -7%	43.2 7%	43.3 7%
Maximum Bottom * (°C)	58.5	45.1 23%	45.6 22%	49 16%	46 21%	50.3 14%
Idle Upper Side * (°C)	28.3	25.7 9%	29.8 -5%	35 -24%	27.7 2%	27 5%
Idle Bottom * (°C)	29.9	25.5 15%	27.4 8%	34 -14%	264 -783%	28.3 5%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.12 / 2.5 Watt
Idle	7.4 / 14.9 / 15.2 Watt
Load	100.8 / 251.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, , IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		17%	-58%	8%	-26%	27%	-22%	-44%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	7.4	4.6 38%	20.1 -172%	9 -22%	11.7 -58%	5.8 22%	11.5 ?(4.6 - 32, n=12) -55%	14.1 ?(4.3 - 41.5, n=117, last 2 years) -91%
Idle Average * (Watt)	14.9	9.8 34%	27.6 -85%	11 26%	16.6 -11%	10.9 27%	16.5 ?(9.8 - 36, n=12) -11%	20.1 ?(8 - 55.6, n=117, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	15.2	10.2 33%	31.8 -109%	23 -51%	17.1 -13%	11.2 26%	22.2 ?(10.2 - 47, n=12) -46%	27.1 ?(9 - 101.1, n=117, last 2 years) -78%
Load Average * (Watt)	100.8	76.1 25%	102.7 -2%	91 10%	122.4 -21%	91.3 9%	104 ?(76.1 - 132, n=12) -3%	111 ?(59 - 201, n=115, last 2 years) -10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)	181.4	198.1 -9%	192.3 -6%	130 28%	241 -33%	117.9 35%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)	184.8	198.9 -8%	217 -17%	132.5 28%	245 -33%	123.8 33%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	251.1	235.2 6%	292 -16%	155 38%	291.5 -16%	155.3 38%	236 ?(155 - 322, n=12) 6%	262 ?(122 - 431, n=117, last 2 years) -4%

* ... smaller is better

能耗赛博朋克/压力测试

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø184.3 (178-248)

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.25 (8.22-12.3)

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø184.8 (181.6-189)

带外部监控器的能耗

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.7 (96.6-142.5)

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø117.7 (97-141.8)

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø35.6 (27.7-60.3)

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø107.3 (95.8-141)

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø134.2 (128.2-165.2)

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.53 (7.89-19)

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø181.4 (177.1-186.7)

电池寿命

在电池续航时间方面，酷睿 16 仅次于华硕 TUF Gaming A16.在亮度为 150 cd/m²（52%）、频率为 60 Hz 的 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间略低于 11 小时，最大亮度下约为 7 小时。充满电需要 105 分钟，51 分钟后达到 80%。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		10h 53min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		7h 02min

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh	13 h +19%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 99.8 Wh	10.9 h
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 99.8 Wh	9.1 h -17%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh	8.6 h -21%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh	7.7 h -29%
Average of class Gaming (1.417 - 14.8, n=119, last 2 years)	6.64 h -39%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 96 Wh	4.3 h -61%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh	8.9 h +27%
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 99.8 Wh	7 h
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh	6.5 h -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 99.8 Wh	6.2 h -11%
Average of class Gaming (2.35 - 8.93, n=36, last 2 years)	5.17 h -26%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Back to the verdict

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 - 10/04/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

85%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

71 / 80 → 89%

Weight

62 / 10-68 → 90%

Battery

87 / 95 → 91%

Display

87%

Games Performance

89%

Application Performance

89%

AI Performance

95%

Temperature

81 / 95 → 85%

Noise

78 / 90 → 86%

Audio

77%

Camera

40 / 75 → 53%

Average

64%

86%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
76.9%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 33.2%

可比较的替代品

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Height	Display
1. 86.2%	SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	List Price: 2100€	2.1 kg	23 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
2. 83.8%	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $1,779.00 List Price: 2199€	2.2 kg	25.7 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
3. 84.9%	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory	Amazon: $2,389.00 List Price: 1800 USD	2.5 kg	23.4 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
4. 80.1%	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $1,249.99 GIGABYTE - Gaming A16 Gaming... 2. Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 3. Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 1700 EUR	2.3 kg	23 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
5. 87.4%	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $63.29 atFoliX Plastic Glass Protec... 2. $69.49 atFoliX Screen Protection Fi... 3. $69.49 atFoliX Screen Protector com... List Price: 2480€	2.5 kg	26.5 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
6. 83.7%	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $1,599.99 GIGABYTE AERO X16; Copilot+ ... 2. $1,270.11 GIGABYTE AERO X16; Copilot+ ... 3. Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1799€	2 kg	19.9 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1284
HP ZBook Fury 16 G11 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	1286
MSI Sword 16 HX B14VGKG i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1298
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1299
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, Radeon 8050S	1316
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1333
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1342
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
R9 5900X, Radeon RX 6750 XT	36702
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36734
R9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	36813
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	36818
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	36864
Minisforum MS-S1 Max Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S	37011
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	37012
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论 - XMG 酷睿 16 是一款可靠的中端游戏笔记本电脑

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

箱子和设备

尺寸比较

输入设备

显示屏 - IPS，300 Hz &amp; FreeSync

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 禅 5 和布莱克韦尔

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8

图形处理器性能

赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表

排放量

系统噪音

温度

发言人

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 M25 audio analysis

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP audio analysis

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 audio analysis

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H audio analysis

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) audio analysis

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH audio analysis

能源管理

能耗 赛博朋克/压力测试

带外部监控器的能耗

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可比较的替代品

More articles related to this device

Transparency

显示屏 - IPS，300 Hz & FreeSync

能耗赛博朋克/压力测试