结论 - 保持冷静
惠普 Omen 17 是一款可靠的中端游戏机，其强大的规格足以满足休闲和偶尔玩玩游戏的玩家。它的 2K 1440p 240 Hz 显示屏是一大亮点，与 AMD Ryzen AI 7 CPU 和GeForce RTX 5070 GPU 搭配使用，每瓦性能比去年的 Omen 17 有所提高。低核心温度也值得称赞，因为与更薄或更轻的替代产品的 80 C 或更高温度相比，该处理器在游戏时几乎不会突破 70 C 大关。
Pros
Cons
惠普今年更新了 Omen 17 系列，推出了新款 Omen 17z-db100。2025 型号用更新的 Zen 5 Ryzen AI 和 RTX Blackwell 选项分别取代了 2024 型号上的 Zen 4 Ryzen 7 8845HS CPU 和GeForce RTX 4070 Ada Lovelace GPU。机箱或骨架在其他方面没有变化，因此我们对 2024 机型的许多现有评论也没有改变。 对 2024 型号的评论仍然适用于 2025 版本。
我们的测试机是高端配置，配备 Ryzen AI 7 350 CPU、RTX 5070 GPU 和 16:9 2K 1440p IPS 显示屏，售价约为 1300 至 1600 美元。低端型号配备 Ryzen AI 5 340、RTX 5060 和 1080p 显示屏，高端型号配备 Ryzen AI 9 365。
Omen 17 的替代产品包括其他中端 17 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，如 联想 LOQ 17, 微星 Crosshair A17或 华硕 TUF Gaming A17 系列.
更多惠普评论：
规格
案例
虽然机身大部分是塑料材质，但惠普通过深色哑光表面和坚固的框架很好地掩盖了这一点，给人留下了相对深刻的第一印象。遗憾的是，该系统仍然是一个巨大的指纹磁铁，而且由于铰链一般，盖子在调整角度时容易摇晃。
在重量和尺寸方面，Omen 17 介于较小的华硕 TUF Gaming A17 和华硕 TUF Gaming A17 之间。 华硕 TUF Gaming A17和较大的 宏碁 Nitro 5之间，而厚度则略高于 联想 LOQ 17.
交流
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
网络摄像头
标配 200 万像素网络摄像头，带红外和物理快门。
维护
底部面板由 8 颗十字螺丝固定，便于维修。用户可以直接访问两个 SODIMM 插槽和两个 PCIe4 x4 2280 NVMe SSD 插槽。
可持续性
惠普在制造该机型时采用了一定比例的海洋塑料。包装完全可回收，交流适配器周围的塑料包装极少。
配件和保修
零售包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外，没有其他任何附件。制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备
键盘
按键反馈偏浅，特别是对于游戏笔记本而言，反馈非常轻。喜欢更硬、更 "咔哒 "机械键盘的玩家可能会觉得 Omen 17 的按键太软。不过，对于一般的键入和数据输入，由于集成了数字键盘，键盘的效果还是不错的。
触摸板
宽敞的点击板（13.5 x 8.6 厘米）比 LOQ 17 或微星 Crosshair A17 上的点击板更大。 微星 Crosshair A17(12 x 7.5 厘米）大。它的滑动性能非常出色，在较慢的速度下有恰到好处的粘性，可以实现更精确的点击和拖动。不过，点击时的行程很浅，因此如果能提供更有力的反馈，则会更有帮助。
显示屏 - 色彩绚丽，刷新率高
我们的 2025 Omen 17 采用了与 2024 Omen 17 相同的 BOE0B67 控制器，从亮度级别到黑白响应时间，总体属性相似。因此，两款机型的显示选项保持一致，观看体验没有重大升级。对于一款中端游戏笔记本电脑来说，这未必是件坏事，因为 2K 1440p IPS 显示屏与移动 RTX 5070 搭配得非常好。与华硕 TUF Gaming A17 或宏碁 Nitro 5 AN5 的廉价面板相比，我们尤其欣赏其 >95% sRGB 色彩。 宏碁 Nitro 5 AN517相比，华硕 TUF Gaming A17 或宏碁 Nitro 5 AN517 的廉价面板色彩空间要窄得多。
该显示器的主要缺点是对 HDR 的支持较弱，而且缺乏 G-Sync。不过，对于休闲游戏玩家的目标受众来说，这些功能可以说是奢侈品而非必需品。Windows 仍支持低至 48 Hz 的可变刷新率，以节省电池电量。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 373.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 602:1 (Black: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.53 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 1.39
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
68.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6257 K
| HP Omen 17z-db100 BOE0B67, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz | HP Omen 17-db0079ng BOE0B67, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 N173HME-G31 (CMN174C), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 165 Hz | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 BOE0A6F NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 0% | 24% | -40% | -43% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 66.6 | 66.2 -1% | 66.3 0% | 97.1 46% | 39.7 -40% | 37.6 -44% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 96.8 | 95.5 -1% | 97.5 1% | 99.9 3% | 59.1 -39% | 56.4 -42% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 68.6 | 68.1 -1% | 68.4 0% | 84.9 24% | 41 -40% | 38.9 -43% |
| Response Times | 16% | 3% | 31% | -148% | -22% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 15.1 ? | 14.4 ? 5% | 16 ? -6% | 13.3 ? 12% | 39 ? -158% | 18 ? -19% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 11.3 ? | 8.3 ? 27% | 10.1 ? 11% | 5.7 ? 50% | 26.9 ? -138% | 14 ? -24% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | ||||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | ||||||
| Screen | 20% | 22% | 26% | -31% | -45% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 373.2 | 363 -3% | 315 -16% | 471 26% | 255.9 -31% | 285 -24% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 341 | 341 0% | 297 -13% | 468 37% | 248 -27% | 257 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 84 | 84 0% | 87 4% | 96 14% | 91 8% | 81 -4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.62 | 0.38 39% | 0.29 53% | 0.4 35% | 0.21 66% | 0.58 6% |
| Contrast (:1) | 602 | 955 59% | 1086 80% | 1178 96% | 1219 102% | 491 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.53 | 1.74 31% | 2.38 6% | 2.72 -8% | 4.51 -78% | 4.59 -81% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.03 | 5.39 -7% | 3.66 27% | 5.49 -9% | 20.77 -313% | 6.98 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.39 | 1.43 -3% | 0.96 31% | 1.12 19% | 1.82 -31% | 4.82 -247% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 1.3 68% | 2.9 29% | 3.2 22% | 3.2 22% | 2.89 30% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.235 98% | 2.052 107% | 2.227 99% | 2.08 106% | 2.38 92% |
| CCT | 6257 104% | 6346 102% | 6319 103% | 6925 94% | 6054 107% | 7000 93% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
15% | 8% /
15% | 27% /
26% | -73% /
-50% | -37% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
尽管色温略微偏暖，但显示器开箱即按照 sRGB 标准进行了校准。X-Rite 校准解决了这个小问题，将平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别从 4.1 和 2.53 提高到 2.5 和 1.39。我们的校准 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 15.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - AMD Zen 5 升级
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前，我们将 Omen Gaming Hub 设置为性能模式和独立显卡模式。我们还提供了更高的 "释放 "模式，但这对性能水平几乎没有影响，下面的结果将说明这一点。
在集成显卡、混合显卡和独立显卡之间切换时，每次都需要重新启动。
处理器
......（英文 Ryzen AI 7 350仅比 Ryzen 7 8845HS快 5%到 10%。它最大的优势在于人工智能加速，因为 CPU 采用的是 Zen 5 架构，而不是较早的 Zen 4 系列。不过，从游戏玩家的角度来看，Ryzen AI 7 350 与 Ryzen 7 8845HS 甚至是 Ryzen 9 8945HS.
需要更强 CPU 马力的用户可以考虑其他 Omen 笔记本电脑，如 欧曼 16或 Omen Max 16配备 酷睿 i9-14900HX或 Core Ultra 9 275HX分别可将多线程性能提高 50%。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (20203 - 28112, n=13) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (75098 - 108991, n=13) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (3395 - 4399, n=13) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (67317 - 77400, n=13) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (11916 - 13856, n=13) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (39456 - 58771, n=12) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (56915 - 87670, n=13) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (839 - 1138, n=13) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (10707 - 15203, n=12) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (25283 - 47405, n=13) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力时，CPU 将稳定在 3.9 GHz、74 C 和 65 W，即使 CPU 使用率达到 100%，性能也相对稳定。与速度更快的 7 16IAX10 CPU 的 82 C 相比，核心温度相对较低，我们对此也表示赞赏。 Legion 7 16IAX10相比，运行相同测试时的核心温度相对较低。
在 Unleashed（或 Turbo）模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，GPU 的频率稳定在 2542 MHz，功耗为 110 W，温度为 72 C。在 "性能 "模式下运行时，结果几乎保持不变，这意味着这两种模式在实际运行中几乎没有差别。直到系统设置为平衡模式后，GPU 才会更明显地降至 2265 MHz、70 C 和 87 W。
| 平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 33 | 33 |
| Prime95 压力 | 3.9 | -- | 74 | 46 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 3.2 | 2115 | 80 | 75 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力（平衡模式） | 2.1 | 2310 | 66 | 70 |
| 赛博朋克2077压力（性能模式） | 2.5 | 2550 | 69 | 72 |
| 赛博朋克2077压力（涡轮模式） | 2.5 | 2542 | 69 | 72 |
系统性能
PCMark 10 只有在设置为 iGPU 模式时才能运行，因此我们的 "数字内容创建 "得分要比实际得分低得多。尽管如此，我们还是遇到了一些值得一提的错误。首先，系统有时无法从睡眠状态正确唤醒，因此需要重启。其次，试图通过 Omen Gaming Hub 在集成显卡、混合显卡或独立显卡之间进行切换也不总是有效。在切换到 iGPU 或 dGPU 模式之前，系统必须首先进入混合模式，否则无法进行切换。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 -3! | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng -1! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (7717 - 7925, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (10510 - 11793, n=2) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (10416 - 10730, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (9858 - 12337, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1752 - 1858, n=2) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1664 - 1732, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1959 - 2077, n=2) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1461 - 1642, n=2) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (288 - 336, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (246 - 277, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (431 - 470, n=2) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7717 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (38001 - 106997, n=13) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (44209 - 63650, n=13) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (42604 - 110817, n=13) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87.7 - 109.8, n=13) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 显示，在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时会出现 DPC 问题，但在播放 4K60 视频内容时没有出现掉帧现象。有趣的是，在播放测试中，iGPU 的活动会波动到高达 100%，而不是像其他大多数笔记本电脑那样稳定在 40% 到 60% 之间。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试机配备了一款不太知名的 T-Force TM8FFE004TPCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘，而不是去年 Omen 17 上的 WD PC SN560。虽然 T-Force 硬盘的传输速率稍微快了几百 MB/s，但它也更容易受到节流的影响，正如我们下面的 DiskSpd 循环结果所示，在几分钟的时间里，性能会从 5300 MB/s 降到 3000 MB/s。固态硬盘可能需要额外的冷却或更大的散热器才能获得更稳定的性能。
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
移动版GeForce RTX 5070 已经过广泛测试，其他基准测试和规格可在我们的 专门页面.对于预兆 17，GPU 的运行功率可达 110 W，性能比我们数据库中具有相同 GPU 选项的普通笔记本电脑快 5 到 10%。与 2024 年的预兆 17 相比，采用较早的 RTX 4070相比，我们的 RTX 5070 在原始光栅化方面大约快 10%到 20%。
降级到 RTX 5060配置，预计性能会下降 10%。遗憾的是，目前还没有 RTX 5070 Ti选项，因为它的 VRAM 池更大，游戏性能会比 RTX 5070 提升很多。
根据我们的Fire Strike 结果表，Turbo（或 Unleashed 模式）与 Performance 模式之间的性能差异微乎其微。同时，降至平衡模式对图形性能的影响仅为几个百分点。这些结果与我们在压力测试部分的观察结果一致。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 涡轮模式（110 瓦） | 38680 | 28348 | 13918 |
| 性能模式（110 瓦） | 38649 (-0%) | 28300 (-0%) | 14013 (-0%) |
| 平衡模式（87 瓦） | 35801 (-7%) | 28092 (-1%) | 13814 (-1%) |
| 电池功率 | 24554 (-37%) | 25589 (-10%) | 8451 (-39%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 35544 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 61746 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 31381 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 13082 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 3054 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
移动 RTX 5070 非常适合 1080p 或 2K 1440p 游戏，但在运行要求更高的游戏时，它只能在中等或更低的设置下运行。例如，《黑色神话：悟空传》在 1080p 高设置下的平均帧数超过 60FPS，但在最高 1440p 设置下就很吃力。为了充分利用原生 240 Hz 刷新率，我们建议在中等设置下运行要求最苛刻的游戏，以获得更高的基本帧率，然后在可用的情况下激活 DLSS 和多帧生成功能。
值得一提的是，即使经过多次重新测试并使用最新的 GPU 驱动程序，运行《刺客信条：阴影》时的性能仍低于预期。例如，在 1080p 低设置下运行游戏时，平均帧率仅为 39 FPS，而在其他配备相同 RTX 5070 GPU 的笔记本电脑上，平均帧率可达 80 多 FPS。
根据我们使用其他 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑的经验，降级到 RTX 5060 配置预计只会影响 5% 到 10% 的游戏性能。
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG -1! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 -1! | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng -1! | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 | |
| Monster Hunter Wilds | |
| 1920x1080 lowest, no upscaling | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (69.1 - 86.5, n=3) | |
| 1920x1080 medium, no upscaling | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (61.6 - 78.2, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| 1920x1080 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (39.1 - 44.5, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| 2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (21.1 - 31.7, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 178.7 | 171.6 | 166.2 | 112.8 | 110.9 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 172 | 149.7 | 143 | 136.1 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 212 | 184.5 | 141 | 103.8 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 112.9 | 100.5 | 82.9 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 430 | 339 | 294 | 258 | 169.3 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 192.4 | 166.3 | 144.8 | 141.4 | 139.4 | 96.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 140.7 | 134.3 | 118.2 | 104.3 | 79.1 | 67.4 |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 84.7 | 82.4 | 69.1 | 40.5 | ||
| F1 24 (2024) | 242 | 221 | 228 | 86.1 | 81.9 | 52.6 |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 114 | 84 | 65 | 36 | 40 | 26 |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 137.6 | 39.1 | 19.1 | 12.3 | ||
| Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 80.1 | 74 | 44.5 | 41.9 | 31.7 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 39 | 36 | 32 | 25 | 25 | 22 |
排放量
系统噪音
可能是由于采用了更高效的 Zen 5 CPU，系统中的风扇可以比 2024 型号保持更长时间的安静。例如，在运行3DMark 06 时，第一个基准场景结束时风扇噪音最高仅为 34 dB(A)，而去年的机型为 45 dB(A)。
不过，在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，风扇噪音上限仍和以前一样，约为 50 dB(A)。请注意，该上限在 "性能 "和 "释放 "模式之间没有变化。将电源配置文件进一步下调至平衡模式后，噪音上限将大幅降低至 44 dB(A)，尽管如上文 GPU 性能部分所述，图形性能会略有下降。
52 dB(A) 的噪音范围比我们在联想 LOQ 17 上观察到的噪音范围要小得多。 联想 LOQ 17或 华硕 TUF Gaming A17在类似条件下的噪音要小得多。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 26.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33.7 / 52.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A) | ||
| HP Omen 17z-db100 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350 | HP Omen 17-db0079ng GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-14700HX, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101 | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, WDC PC SN810 512GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -13% | -17% | -29% | -15% | -31% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.4 | 25 -7% | 24 -3% | 24 -3% | 27.9 -19% | 25.7 -10% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.7 | 25 -5% | 25 -5% | 25 -5% | 28.5 -20% | 25.7 -8% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.7 | 29 -22% | 26 -10% | 30 -27% | 29.8 -26% | 31.5 -33% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26.4 | 33 -25% | 32 -21% | 47 -78% | 29.8 -13% | 31.2 -18% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 33.7 | 45 -34% | 56 -66% | 57 -69% | 34.8 -3% | 62.9 -87% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 49.8 | 48 4% | 55 -10% | 57 -14% | ||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 52.5 | 52 1% | 56 -7% | 58 -10% | 57.3 -9% | 67.5 -29% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 57.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘中心的表面温度最高，游戏时热点温度可达近 40 摄氏度。值得庆幸的是，WASD 键、数字键盘和掌托的温度都要低得多。
平均表面温度比我们在竞争产品上体验到的温度低几摄氏度。 联想 LOQ 17IRX10在类似条件下，热点温度可达 45 摄氏度以上。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.7 °C / 6.6 F).
| HP Omen 17z-db100 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | -22% | -40% | 2% | -22% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 39.8 | 44 -11% | 45 -13% | 51 -28% | 40 -1% | 42.4 -7% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 47 | 45 4% | 49 -4% | 49 -4% | 33.6 29% | 48.2 -3% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 23.2 | 26 -12% | 32 -38% | 40 -72% | 26.6 -15% | 31.6 -36% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 23.2 | 27 -16% | 31 -34% | 36 -55% | 24.4 -5% | 33.1 -43% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
HP Omen 17z-db100 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
尽管我们的新机型性能更快，但负载时的平均消耗水平普遍低于去年机型的记录。例如，在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，2025 Omen 17 的功耗降低了约 12%，而运行速度却提高了 17%，从而提高了每瓦性能。如果使用多帧生成功能，帧率优势会更大，因为GeForce RTX 40 系列 GPU 不具备该功能。
当 CPU 和 GPU 的利用率达到 100% 时，我们可以记录到中等尺寸（约 18 x 8.5 x 2.5 厘米）的 230 W AC 适配器的最大功耗为 228 W。
| Off / Standby | 0.04 / 0.071 Watt |
| Idle | 6.2 / 19.1 / 19.3 Watt |
| Load |
91 / 227.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, , IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | -39% | -108% | -0% | -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 6.2 | 6 3% | 14.4 -132% | 32 -416% | 6.2 -0% | 7.6 -23% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 19.1 | 12 37% | 17.2 10% | 36 -88% | 21.8 -14% | 11.3 41% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 19.3 | 18 7% | 28 -45% | 47 -144% | 22 -14% | 15.4 20% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 91 | 71 22% | 158 -74% | 132 -45% | 59.2 35% | 151 -66% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 173 | 191.8 -11% | 199.3 -15% | 216 -25% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 175.9 | 197 -12% | 203 -15% | 222 -26% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 227.9 | 228 -0% | 232 -2% | 261 -15% | 247.8 -9% | 244 -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 189.7 | 137.8 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
对于一款 17 英寸游戏笔记本电脑来说，电池容量还算不错，83 Wh，在 iGPU 模式下，实际无线局域网运行时间略高于 8 小时。竞争对手如华硕 TUF Gaming A17 或 宏碁 Nitro 5 AN517等竞争对手的电池容量稍大，运行时间稍长。
使用随附的交流适配器从空闲状态充电到满电状态的时间不到 90 分钟。也支持通过第三方 USB-C AC 适配器充电。
| HP Omen 17z-db100 Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 83 Wh | HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 60 Wh | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 14% | -61% | -45% | 14% | 18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 8 | 9.1 14% | 3.1 -61% | 4.4 -45% | 9.1 14% | 9.4 18% |
| H.264 (h) | 7.7 | 7.4 | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 1 | |||||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 19.7 | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.7 |
笔记本检查评级
以预算为导向的 2025 Omen 17 运行起来比许多竞争对手更凉爽、更安静，但 CPU 可能会让追求性能的用户失望。
HP Omen 17z-db100
- 10/27/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.8%  | HP Omen 17z-db100 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 96 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,989.00 List Price: 1550 USD | 2.9 kg | 30.1 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS |
2. 80.4%  | HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $37.99 BestParts New CPU+GPU Coolin... 2. $139.89 HPDELGB Replacement for HP O... 3. $70.22 SCREENARAMA New Screen Repla... List Price: 1900€ | 2.8 kg | 30.1 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS |
3. 79.8%  | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 Intel Core i7-14700HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,749.00 Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 Gaming La... 2. $1,609.00 Lenovo LOQ 17.3 RTX 5060 AI ... 3. $1,239.00 Lenovo LOQ RTX 5050 Pro AI-G... List Price: 1500 EUR | 2.9 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
4. 79.6%  | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.99 Rujcloud HDMI 2.1 Cable for ... 2. $49.99 SLRIOYS 240W 200W Charger Co... 3. $1,599.99 MSI Crosshair A16 HX 16" QHD... List Price: 2000 EUR | 2.9 kg | 29.7 mm | 17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS |
5. 85.6% v7 (old)  | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1400 USD | 2.5 kg | 25.4 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
6. 85.5% v7 (old)  | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 Intel Core i5-12500H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $21.99 Fleshy Leaf New CPU+GPU Cool... 2. $49.99 Dongerdi 230W Charger Fit fo... 3. $49.95 LCDBros Replacement Screen f... List Price: 1400€ | 3 kg | 28.9 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
