判决
就质量而言,Aorus Elite 16 确实很出色。虽然外壳并非完全金属材质,但这款 16 英寸笔记本电脑仍给人一种高档的感觉,尤其是输入设备大多令人信服。包括 Thunderbolt 5 在内的现代连接性尤其受到好评,而这在游戏或笔记本电脑领域并不常见(更不用说高速读卡器了)。制造商还考虑了维护和升级选项。例如,Elite 16 提供了两个内存和固态硬盘插槽,在测试配置中全部占用。
IPS 显示屏(165 Hz,2560 x 1600 像素)也不错,不过专业用户可能更喜欢色彩空间覆盖范围更大的显示屏。在性能方面,处理器尤其令人印象深刻:英特尔酷睿至尊 9 275HX 一如既往地提供了非常出色的性能--如果不考虑功耗要求的话。RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的 VRAM 虽然微不足道(8 GB 在 2025 年并不是什么新鲜事),但仍然比基于相同 GPU 的其他笔记本电脑更快。不出所料,用户必须忍受负载下的巨大噪音,尤其是在使用高性能配置文件时。Elite 16 凭借高于平均水平的扬声器音效在竞争中脱颖而出。电池续航时间也能满足大多数买家的需求。总的来说,我们还是会向预算有限的用户推荐价格更实惠的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
经过测试的 Aorus Elite 16 AE6H 配有 Core Ultra 9 275HX 和GeForce RTX 5070,在多家在线商店(如playox.de)的售价约为 2300 欧元(约合 2680 美元)。
Elite 16 的竞争对手包括其他采用 Blackwell GPU 的中端游戏机(如RTX 5060, RTX 5070, RTX 5070 Ti),如 联想Legion 5 15,以及 微星 Crosshair A17 HX、联想 联想Legion 5 Pro 16和 微星 Vector 16.旧的 Aorus 16X配备 RTX 4070也作为对比设备出现在表格中。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
Elite 16 采用金属盖和塑料底座,与许多其他游戏笔记本相似。事实证明,这些表面大部分都很稳定,只有在施加更大压力时,某些区域才会稍有松动。同时,灯光爱好者不仅可以期待 RGB 键盘,还可以在后部看到灯带(见照片)。16 英寸键盘的重量为 2.4 千克,在同类产品中处于中游位置,重量在 1.9 至 2.9 千克之间。高度也差不多:略低于 2.6 厘米(无脚垫),既不厚实也不特别薄。技嘉可以改进盖子的开启角度,因为最大 130° 的角度有些有限。
设备
Elite 16 提供两个 USB-A 端口和两个 USB-C 端口,后者支持 Thunderbolt 4 和 Thunderbolt 5(各包括 DisplayPort 和 PowerDelivery)。此外,还有一个 HDMI 2.1 输出端口、一个音频插孔、一个千兆 LAN 端口和一个速度极快的 MicroSD 读卡器。无线模块(英特尔 Wi-Fi 7 BE200)的接收速度也毫不逊色于竞争对手。制造商安装了一个可靠的全高清摄像头作为网络摄像头,尽管它没有隐私快门。拧松 12 颗 Torx 螺钉后,底板即可拆下。
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (20 - 207, n=73, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=72, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (469 - 1685, n=34) | |
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1862, n=124, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1741, n=124, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (838 - 1736, n=34) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H |
网络摄像头

维护
输入设备
技嘉取消了数字键盘,这对按键的大小大有裨益。就连在许多笔记本上都非常小的方向箭头也大小适中。只要你不期望达到机械机型的水平,打字手感也不会让人有什么不满。触摸板也获得了很好的评价;精确度、手势支持和滑动特性都不明显。13.4 x 9 厘米的表面积对于 16 英寸设备来说绰绰有余。
显示屏
虽然有些竞争对手采用 OLED 面板,但技嘉在测试设备上采用了经典的 IPS 面板,因此不会出现任何明显的瑕疵。虽然色彩空间可以更宽广,但游戏玩家对 100% sRGB 感到满意。响应时间和可视角度也是优秀 IPS 机型的典型表现。亮度(平均 433 cd/m²)、黑度(0.42 cd/m²)和对比度(1,055:1)与 微星 Vector 16也拥有 2,560 x 1,600 像素的分辨率。幸运的是,我们没有发现任何图像闪烁或明显的屏幕出血现象。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 443 cd/m²
Contrast: 1055:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.82 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
calibrated: 1.33
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
72.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
70.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.249
CCT: 6549 K
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H NE160QDM-NYJ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Aorus 16X 2024 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H ATNA60HS01-0 (Samsung SDC420A), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG B160QAN02.3 (AUO7DB2), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | 25% | 18% | 24% | 17% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.8 | 67.2 -5% | 99.9 41% | 97.1 37% | 99.9 41% | 96.6 36% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 96.7 -3% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.6 | 69.3 -5% | 98.3 35% | 84.9 17% | 94.1 30% | 84.4 16% |
Response Times | 44% | 96% | 25% | 85% | 49% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.8 ? | 7.5 ? 55% | 0.42 ? 97% | 13.3 ? 21% | 2 ? 88% | 4.3 ? 74% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.9 ? | 5.4 ? 32% | 0.4 ? 95% | 5.7 ? 28% | 1.4 ? 82% | 6 ? 24% |
PWM Frequency | 1152 ? | 1300 | ||||
PWM Amplitude * | 11 | 16.7 | ||||
Screen | 16% | 43% | 17% | 14% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 443 | 542 22% | 492 11% | 471 6% | 518 17% | 473 7% |
Brightness | 433 | 504 16% | 495 14% | 468 8% | 522 21% | 426 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 92 2% | 96 7% | 97 8% | 85 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.45 -7% | 0.4 5% | 0.42 -0% | ||
Contrast | 1055 | 1204 14% | 1178 12% | 1126 7% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.82 | 2.73 29% | 0.9 76% | 2.72 29% | 2.49 35% | 3.47 9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.61 | 5.29 30% | 1.8 76% | 5.49 28% | 5.25 31% | 7.24 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.33 | 1.32 1% | 1.12 16% | 2.15 -62% | 1.36 -2% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 2.9 47% | 1.2 78% | 3.2 42% | 3.02 45% | 3.1 44% |
Gamma | 2.249 98% | 2.192 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.227 99% | 2.37 93% | 2.486 88% |
CCT | 6549 99% | 6173 105% | 6291 103% | 6925 94% | 6426 101% | 6832 95% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 19% /
16% | 55% /
48% | 20% /
18% | 41% /
28% | 24% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.7 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.1 ms rise | |
↘ 8.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
在驱动程序方面,Elite 16 似乎尚未完全成熟,因为我们在测试过程中经常遇到黑屏问题(尤其是在关闭程序时)--即使使用的是最新的 Nvidia 驱动程序。这些问题可能是由于图形切换造成的;在连接外接显示器(dGPU 永久激活)时,我们才幸免于黑屏。
时尚 | 均衡 | 游戏 | 节能 |
赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 52 dB(A) | 59 dB(A) | 40 dB(A) |
赛博朋克 2077》性能(FHD/超高清) | 104.1 帧/秒 | 108.7 帧/秒 | 86.7 帧/秒 |
Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 4987 分数 | 5402 分数 | 4960 分数 |
CPU PL1 | 90 W | 125 W | 65 W |
CPU PL2 | 120 W | 150 W | 100 W |
处理器
英特尔 酷睿至尊 9 275HX是目前市场上最强大的笔记本处理器之一。共有 8 个性能内核和 16 个效率内核(24 个线程),确保了非常出色的性能。该处理器在 Elite 16 中的表现也没有让人失望,而且还提供了相当稳定的结果--关键词 Cinebench loop。竞争产品 Ryzen 9 8940HX仅以微弱优势落败。
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H -1! | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12026 - 16108, n=19) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (774 - 870, n=19) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=147, last 2 years) | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4756 - 6271, n=19) | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (306 - 343, n=20) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82 - 116, n=18) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30.7 - 43.8, n=19) | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (33.2 - 62.1, n=19) | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=19) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (28067 - 39895, n=18) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (140254 - 200744, n=18) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6766 - 9734, n=18) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (113887 - 140937, n=18) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=144, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (11172 - 14415, n=18) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72596 - 104217, n=18) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (107195 - 136847, n=18) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=144, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1599 - 2263, n=18) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14847 - 21542, n=18) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (39524 - 62916, n=18) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG |
系统性能
Elite 16 在系统性能方面也遥遥领先,尽管前代产品与之不相上下。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 -1! | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
Average of class Gaming | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=131, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=131, last 2 years) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=131, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=131, last 2 years) | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=113, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=113, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=113, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=113, last 2 years) | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=125, last 2 years) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=135, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8104 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (63022 - 94460, n=18) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (65869 - 97151, n=18) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=144, last 2 years) | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (61633 - 106063, n=18) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=144, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 151.7, n=18) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
测试配置提供了两个固态硬盘,每个可容纳 1 TB。操作系统硬盘在基准测试中表现出色,几乎处于比较领域的前列。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
更重要的是,得益于 115 瓦的全 TGP(包括动态升压),RTX 5070 笔记本电脑 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑表现相对较好。在 3DMarks 中,最终成绩比之前确定的该显卡平均成绩高出 7%。竞争对手基于 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑的竞争对手要快 20%左右。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H -1! | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 -1! |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (10741 - 76300, n=139, last 2 years) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (40285 - 46297, n=8) | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average of class Gaming (2913 - 62849, n=155, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (31345 - 37331, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (2295 - 25763, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (11969 - 14224, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (984 - 16978, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (7606 - 8975, n=9) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 39124 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 65707 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 31796 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 14369 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=139, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (17 - 21, n=8) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=139, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (30 - 35, n=8) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏过程中,Elite 16 几乎赶上了 RTX 5070 Ti 的同类产品,至少在全高清分辨率下是如此。不过,在 QHD 分辨率下,差距再次拉大,尤其是在 VRAM 较重的游戏中(8 GB 而不是 12 GB 显存会在这方面造成损失)。不过,Elite 16 的速度通常足以流畅运行大多数采用 2,560 x 1,600 或 2,560 x 1,440 像素、高至最高设置的游戏。但优化较差的游戏除外,如《星球大战外传》(Star Wars Outlaws),在这种情况下,40 多 FPS 的速度是不够的。可以激活 DLSS(可选择使用帧生成功能)来提高性能。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG -1! | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG -1! | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H -1! | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
Aorus 16X 2024 -1! | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 166.5, n=130, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (82.4 - 108.7, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=94, last 2 years) | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (101.3 - 140.8, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (102.5 - 160.2, n=9) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (96 - 150.6, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=133, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (203 - 259, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (130.9 - 184.2, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 166.2, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (73.9 - 116.3, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
Assassin's Creed Shadows | |
2560x1440 Ultra High | |
Average of class Gaming (25 - 64, n=34, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (30 - 38, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
2560x1440 Ultra High + DLSS Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (33 - 117, n=21, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (39 - 45, n=2) |
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (42.6 - 86, n=10, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (42.6 - 52.1, n=3) | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
Average of class Gaming (57.6 - 114.5, n=10, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (58.5 - 71.5, n=3) |
Star Wars Outlaws | |
2560x1440 cinem. ultra | |
Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 61, n=9, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (32.4 - 35.1, n=2) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
2560x1440 cinem. ultra DLSS | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (34.1 - 70.9, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (48.2 - 48.5, n=2) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H |
Space Marine 2 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (48.2 - 98.6, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (54.7 - 70.8, n=2) | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (58.5 - 100.8, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (58.5 - 89.5, n=2) |
Until Dawn | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (32.9 - 69.5, n=8, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (35.4 - 44.4, n=2) | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS + Ray Tracing | |
Average of class Gaming (41.5 - 86.3, n=8, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (46.7 - 57.8, n=2) |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 184.6 | 179.6 | 148.6 | 129.1 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 223 | 193.8 | 185 | 169.6 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 198.4 | 150.6 | 110 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 157.5 | 135 | 115.9 | |||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 155.9 | 123.9 | 121.3 | 84.9 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 167 | 122.8 | 108.7 | 66.9 | ||
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 71.8 | 62 | 50.3 | 48.2 | 32.4 | |
Space Marine 2 (2024) | 101.8 | 99.2 | 97.3 | 89.5 | 70.8 | |
Until Dawn (2024) | 109.5 | 81.3 | 61.8 | 57.8 | 44.4 | |
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 123.7 | 102.6 | 75.4 | 71.5 | 52.1 | |
Civilization 7 (2025) | 201 | 166.5 | 111.6 | |||
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 74 | 63 | 43 | 45 | 38 |
我们用《赛博朋克 2077》测试了 3D 性能在较长时间内的表现。 赛博朋克 2077进行了测试。测试结果没有出现任何帧率下降。
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart
排放量
噪音排放
使用游戏模式时,Elite 16 在 3D 负载下的音量比竞争对手更大:59 到 61 dB(A),对于耳机来说几乎是尖叫。因此,我们建议在日常使用中使用平衡模式,因为此时设备的噪音会明显降低(在《赛博朋克 2077》中为-7 分贝),而且性能损失不大。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 29 / 32 dB(A) |
Load |
| 60 / 61 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | 14% | -5% | 6% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 26 -8% | 25.5 -6% | 24 -0% | 24 -0% | 25 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 26 -4% | 25.5 -2% | 25 -0% | 24 4% | 33 -32% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 32 -10% | 25.5 12% | 30 -3% | 24 17% | 34 -17% |
Idle Maximum * | 32 | 38 -19% | 26.9 16% | 47 -47% | 30.9 3% | 38 -19% |
Load Average * | 60 | 54 10% | 34.6 42% | 57 5% | 55.9 7% | 46 23% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 59 | 50.1 15% | 57 3% | 56.72 4% | 47 20% | |
Load Maximum * | 61 | 55 10% | 50.1 18% | 58 5% | 56.72 7% | 49 20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下,机箱保持相当低的温度,顶部最高温度为 41 °C,底部最高温度为 45 °C。在空闲状态下,情况出现了一定程度的逆转。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | 5% | -12% | -14% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 41 -0% | 42.2 -3% | 51 -24% | 48 -17% | 53 -29% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 41 9% | 51.7 -15% | 49 -9% | 50 -11% | 52 -16% |
Idle Upper Side * | 35 | 37 -6% | 28.5 19% | 40 -14% | 38 -9% | 33 6% |
Idle Bottom * | 36 | 38 -6% | 29.2 19% | 36 -0% | 42 -17% | 29 19% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
发言人
Elite 16 具有令人信服的音质,这一点值得尊敬,它是在老款 Aorus 16X 的基础上改进而来的。
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Aorus 16X 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
功耗并不突出。对于配备英特尔 CPU 的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑来说,8 至 22 瓦的空闲功耗和 113 至 257 瓦的 3D 功耗是非常典型的。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -30% | 27% | -130% | -23% | -11% | -28% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.5 | 13 -53% | 6.9 19% | 44 -418% | 14 -65% | 7.1 16% | 14.4 ? -69% |
Idle Average * | 13.6 | 18 -32% | 10.7 21% | 52 -282% | 14.3 -5% | 15.9 -17% | 20.5 ? -51% |
Idle Maximum * | 22 | 35 -59% | 11.3 49% | 65 -195% | 20.1 9% | 29.5 -34% | 27.1 ? -23% |
Load Average * | 113 | 138 -22% | 69.7 38% | 132 -17% | 177 -57% | 124 -10% | 108.6 ? 4% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 223 | 162.6 27% | 222 -0% | 255 -14% | 222 -0% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 219 | 165 25% | 216 1% | 255 -16% | 217 1% | ||
Load Maximum * | 257 | 222 14% | 233.6 9% | 261 -2% | 294 -14% | 336 -31% | 261 ? -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 172.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stresstest
Power consumption with the external monitor
电池寿命
技嘉为 Elite 16 配备了强大的 99 Wh 电池,从而保证了相应的良好运行时间。在我们的网页浏览器测试中(亮度降至 150 cd/m²),这款 16 英寸笔记本电脑的运行时间达到了 8.5 小时,与 Aorus 16X 不相上下。
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 99 Wh | Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 80 Wh | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | 14% | -48% | -42% | -18% | -24% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 508 | 481 -5% | 579 14% | 262 -48% | 295 -42% | 419 -18% | 387 ? -24% |
Reader / Idle | 753 | 568 ? | |||||
H.264 | 541 | 687 | 290 | 457 ? | |||
Load | 100 | 72 | 99 | 86.2 ? | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 56 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Aorus Elite 16 与基于 RTX 5070 的普通笔记本电脑相比,在内部和外部价值方面都略胜一筹,但价格也更高。每个人都必须自己决定附加费用是否合理,但对我们来说,16 英寸的笔记本似乎有点太贵了(尤其是考虑到 8GB VRAM)。
Aorus Elite 16 AE6H
- 08/05/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
可比较的替代品
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.