Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 170是一款功能强大的 Strix Point 系列芯片，预计将于 2024 年 6 月亮相。该 APU 配备 12 个 CPU 内核（24 个线程），运行频率高达 5.1 GHz，一个 16 CU RDNA 3+ 图形适配器和一个 45 TOPS XDNA 2 神经处理单元。

架构和功能

Strix Point 系列 APU 将采用 Zen 5 和 Zen 5c 内核，后者是前者的一个稍慢、更小、更节能的版本。从 Zen 2 到 Zen 3，IPC 提升了近 20%，而 Zen 4 也有类似的逐代提升，因此可以肯定的是，Zen 5 将带来至少 15%的 IPC 提升。

HX 170 预计将配备超快的 LPDDR5X-8533 内存控制器、令人印象深刻的 36 MB 三级缓存和 PCIe 4.0 支持，每通道吞吐量可达 1.9 GB/s。它还将拥有一个非常强大的人工智能引擎，并且很可能与 USB 4 / Thunderbolt 4 原生兼容，就像其 8000 系列的前身一样。

性能

12 个尖端架构的 CPU 内核应能媲美高功耗台式机芯片，如 酷睿 i7-13700在多线程和单线程工作负载中均可媲美。一旦我们拿到搭载 HX 170 的笔记本电脑，我们将确保更新本节内容。

图形处理

Ryzen AI 9 芯片预计将配备由 RDNA 3+ 架构支持的 16 CU 集成图形适配器。显卡 Radeon 780M是 AMD 目前提供的最强大的 iGPU，具有 12 个 RDNA 3 架构 CU（768 个统一着色器）作为参考 - 这对于在 1080p / Low 下玩 2023 和 2024 游戏绰绰有余。

当然，新的图形适配器至少可以驱动三台 SUHD 4320p 显示器，而且还能对 AVC、HEVC、AV1 等流行视频编解码器进行硬件编码和硬件解码。

功耗

据传，HX 170 的基本 TDP 为 55 W 或 65 W。这样的芯片需要一个相当大、相当重的机箱，并配备强大的冷却解决方案，才能避免发热问题。

预计该芯片将采用 3 纳米台积电工艺制造，以实现较高的能效（截至 2024 年上半年）。

CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Clock Rate2000 - 5100 MHz
Level 2 Cache12 MB
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
GPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date06/02/2024
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
43.2 pt (72%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
41.1 -5%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
41.3 -4%
Intel Core i7-13800H
41.6 -4%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
42.1 -3%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42.1 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.3 -2%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
42.4 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.7 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
42.8 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
43.4 0%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.5 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.2 2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
44.2 2%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.4 3%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 4%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.2 5%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
45.8 6%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
45.8 6%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50.1 16%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.2 39%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6     avg: 116.4     median: 116 (65%)     max: 121 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621     avg: 1054     median: 1121 (21%)     max: 1284 Points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435     avg: 20440     median: 21761 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1921     avg: 2010     median: 2018 (85%)     max: 2049 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
1959 -3%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
1969 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
1970 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1976 -2%
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
1977 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
1984 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
1988 -1%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2000 0%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2003 0%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2010
Intel Core i7-13800H
2017 0%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2034 1%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2059 2%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 3%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 4%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2120 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2141 7%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 7%
...
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 13%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2357 17%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6449     avg: 8372     median: 8830 (22%)     max: 9280 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13     avg: 3220     median: 3409.5 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 192.1     avg: 299.8     median: 307 (86%)     max: 315 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 38.84     avg: 40.2     median: 40.7 (53%)     max: 41.17 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.68     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8639     avg: 8701     median: 8668 (52%)     max: 8797 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 53766     avg: 55510     median: 56074 (41%)     max: 56689 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 96857     avg: 100361     median: 100569 (64%)     max: 103657 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15698     avg: 15853     median: 15927 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 69.8     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 79.442 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 3.1     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4286     median: 4090 (6%)     max: 4759 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78114     median: 80572.5 (46%)     max: 83714 MIPS
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6144     median: 6135 (72%)     max: 6497 MIPS
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 169.8     avg: 175.5     median: 171.5 (57%)     max: 185.1 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 304.5     avg: 313.5     median: 306 (71%)     max: 330 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.1     median: 26.1 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (45%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.3     avg: 15.7     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 208     avg: 239.2     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 156.2     median: 147.5 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16184     median: 16571.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.43 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.767 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 73944     median: 75793 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20222     median: 20686 (51%)     max: 23282 Points
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 59510     median: 61220 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 60322     median: 61072 (50%)     max: 67802 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (49%)     max: 66810 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19395     median: 19571 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 29596     median: 29958 (53%)     max: 33255 Points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10421     median: 10519 (44%)     max: 12293 Points
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2780     avg: 2881     median: 2876 (72%)     max: 2965 points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 14488     median: 14896 (58%)     max: 15994 points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2952     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12664     avg: 18473     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2083     median: 2098 (82%)     max: 2160 points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14057     median: 14301 (26%)     max: 15759 points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1941     median: 1947 (8%)     max: 2041 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14070     median: 14244 (45%)     max: 14828 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 8044     median: 8033.5 (80%)     max: 8628 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52269     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 419     avg: 441.1     median: 438 (1%)     max: 503 ms
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 107304     median: 107598 (81%)     max: 124105 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 210     avg: 256.3     median: 262 (72%)     max: 277 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 307     median: 319 (57%)     max: 347 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1402     avg: 1766     median: 1778 (66%)     max: 1981 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 90.8     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 94.2     median: 104 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.89     avg: 9.1     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.2 (10%)     max: 12.8 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 36.1     median: 31.4 (23%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33
log 13. 13:10:01

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 Jun 2025 05:35:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.01s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.016s ... 0.026s

#7 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.052s ... 0.078s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.128s ... 1.206s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.207s

#11 return log +0s ... 1.207s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor

ROG ZEPYHUS G14 5070 TI 机箱 03

RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑几乎与 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑一样快 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 评测

华硕推出了市场上速度最快的 14 英寸游戏本 ROG Zephyrus G14 2025。我们测试的是配备 RTX 5070 Ti 和 12 GB VRAM 的机型，它在游戏测试中表现出色。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
4K OLED 被 120 Hz 2.8K OLED 取代 - 华硕 ProArt P16 配 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑评测

4K OLED 被 120 Hz 2.8K OLED 取代 - 华硕 ProArt P16 配 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑评测

ProArt P16 是一款 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑，去年因采用 60 Hz 4K OLED 显示屏而饱受批评。现在，它换上了 120 Hz 2.8K OLED 面板，但在 HDR 亮度方面尤其存在弱点。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
14 英寸GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 评论

14 英寸GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 评论

华硕正在提升 GPU 性能，为其 2025 版 14 英寸游戏机 ROG Zephyrus G14 配备新的GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑。它的处理器是 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370，配备 64 GB 内存和 120 Hz、2.8K OLED 显示屏。更新：新增 Photoshop、Prem...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
搭载 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、价格不到 700 美元的经济型迷你 PC - Acemagic F3A 的详细评测

搭载 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、价格不到 700 美元的经济型迷你 PC - Acemagic F3A 的详细评测

Acemagic F3A 将 AMD-Ryzen-AI-9-HX-370 的强大性能与小巧的机身结合在一起，而且价格公道。在我们的详细评测中，我们分析了这款迷你 PC 在竞争中的表现。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 1 kg
配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比

配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比

如果你想要配备GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑的最轻薄游戏笔记本，目前你可以在华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 和雷蛇 Blade 16 之间进行选择。但性能并不代表一切。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.1 kg

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Radeon 890M, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » 框架笔记本 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 评测：跳过英特尔版本，获得更佳性能

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 评测--游戏笔记本电脑现在配备GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和更轻薄的机箱

  Review » NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑分析--速度更快，但还有更多惊喜等着你

ONEXPLAYER X1 Pro GA15H-HX370-32GB-1TB-H: AMD Radeon 890M, 10.95", 0.9 kg
  Review » XL 游戏掌上电脑、平板电脑和笔记本电脑：OneXplayer X1 Pro 评论

Minisforum AI X1 Pro: AMD Radeon 890M, 1.4 kg
  Review » Minisforum AI X1 Pro 评测：适用于办公、多媒体、游戏和创意任务的全能迷你 PC

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  Review » 华硕 TUF Gaming A16 评论：酷炫、安静、经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑，弱点突出但可行

GMK EVO-X1: AMD Radeon 890M, 0.6 kg
  Review » GMKtec EVO-X1 mini PC 评测：采用 Oculink 和 Ryzen AI 9 的全新盒式设计

GPD Pocket 4: AMD Radeon 890M, 8.80", 0.8 kg
  Review » GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 掌上电脑评测：小巧、快速、可爱

Minisforum EliteMini AI370: AMD Radeon 890M, 0.5 kg
  Review » Minisforum EliteMini AI370 评测：采用 AMD Zen 5 Strix Point APU 的迷你 PC 树立了新标准

Beelink SER9: AMD Radeon 890M, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER9 评测：AMD Zen 5 让这款迷你电脑比以往更快

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Radeon 890M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 华硕 VivoBook S 14 OLED 笔记本电脑评测：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的成功表现

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 华硕 TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV 评测：Zen 5 Ryzen 9 继续给人留下深刻印象

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 的超薄游戏笔记本电脑

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 华硕 ProArt P16 笔记本电脑评测 - AMD Zen 5 与 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑和 4K OLED 的完美结合

  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: AMD Radeon 890M
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Radeon 890M
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » 华硕 ProArt PX13 评测--搭载 AMD Zen 5 和 RTX 4070 的全球最快 13.3 英寸二合一笔记本电脑

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook S 16 笔记本电脑评测--首款在 1.3 厘米厚的外壳内搭载 AMD Zen 5 的 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306WU, HX 370: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306WU, HX 370

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVGG, HX 370: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVGG, HX 370

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV

Asus Vivobook S 16 M5606W: AMD Radeon 880M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 16 M5606W

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306, RTX 4060

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Radeon 890M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606

Asus ProArt P16 H7606: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 是无与伦比的，因为 Razer Blade 14 只能使用 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 华硕只为 ProArt P16 提供 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑是个错误。

   » 华硕 ProArt P16 发布，配备 OLED 触摸屏、最高 64GB 内存和 RTX 5070

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14：最快的 14 英寸游戏机，却没有 5090，错失良机

ONEXPLAYER X1 Pro GA15H-HX370-32GB-1TB-H: AMD Radeon 890M, 10.95", 0.9 kg
   » OneXplayer X1 Pro：打了类固醇的任天堂 Switch

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Radeon 890M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (S5606CA) 发布，配备最新英特尔酷睿 Ultra 200H Arrow Lake 移动 CPU 和 Lumina OLED 显示屏

   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (M506KA) 和 Vivobook S 14 (M5406WA) 首次亮相，配备全新 AMD Krackan Point APU 和 OLED 显示屏

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Radeon 890M
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)

» AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
   12x 3.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
   12x 3.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
   6x 3.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
   12x 3.2 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
   12x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-14650HX
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13700HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-06-21)