Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 170是一款功能强大的 Strix Point 系列芯片，预计将于 2024 年 6 月亮相。该 APU 配备 12 个 CPU 内核（24 个线程），运行频率高达 5.1 GHz，一个 16 CU RDNA 3+ 图形适配器和一个 45 TOPS XDNA 2 神经处理单元。

架构和功能

Strix Point 系列 APU 将采用 Zen 5 和 Zen 5c 内核，后者是前者的一个稍慢、更小、更节能的版本。从 Zen 2 到 Zen 3，IPC 提升了近 20%，而 Zen 4 也有类似的逐代提升，因此可以肯定的是，Zen 5 将带来至少 15%的 IPC 提升。

HX 170 预计将配备超快的 LPDDR5X-8533 内存控制器、令人印象深刻的 36 MB 三级缓存和 PCIe 4.0 支持，每通道吞吐量可达 1.9 GB/s。它还将拥有一个非常强大的人工智能引擎，并且很可能与 USB 4 / Thunderbolt 4 原生兼容，就像其 8000 系列的前身一样。

性能

12 个尖端架构的 CPU 内核应能媲美高功耗台式机芯片，如 酷睿 i7-13700在多线程和单线程工作负载中均可媲美。一旦我们拿到搭载 HX 170 的笔记本电脑，我们将确保更新本节内容。

图形处理

Ryzen AI 9 芯片预计将配备由 RDNA 3+ 架构支持的 16 CU 集成图形适配器。显卡 Radeon 780M是 AMD 目前提供的最强大的 iGPU，具有 12 个 RDNA 3 架构 CU（768 个统一着色器）作为参考 - 这对于在 1080p / Low 下玩 2023 和 2024 游戏绰绰有余。

当然，新的图形适配器至少可以驱动三台 SUHD 4320p 显示器，而且还能对 AVC、HEVC、AV1 等流行视频编解码器进行硬件编码和硬件解码。

功耗

据传，HX 170 的基本 TDP 为 55 W 或 65 W。这样的芯片需要一个相当大、相当重的机箱，并配备强大的冷却解决方案，才能避免发热问题。

预计该芯片将采用 3 纳米台积电工艺制造，以实现较高的能效（截至 2024 年上半年）。

CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)
SeriesAMD Strix / Gorgon Point
Clock Rate2000 - 5100 MHz
Level 2 Cache12 MB
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
GPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT8
Chip AI80 TOPS INT8
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date06/02/2024
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
43.2 pt (72%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
Intel Core i7-13800H
41.5 -4%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 -3%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
42.1 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.2 -2%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
42.3 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
42.6 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
42.8 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
43.2 0%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.1 2%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 3%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 4%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.1 4%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 5%
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
45.5 5%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46 6%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
49.9 16%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 39%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6     avg: 117     median: 117 (58%)     max: 121 Points
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621     avg: 1083     median: 1152 (21%)     max: 1299 Points
+ 32 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435     avg: 20668     median: 21897 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
+ 31 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1921     avg: 2012     median: 2018.5 (82%)     max: 2049 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6449     avg: 8395     median: 8817 (21%)     max: 9280 Points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13     avg: 3242     median: 3448 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 188.8     avg: 291.6     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 34.85     avg: 39     median: 39.5 (51%)     max: 41.17 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.59     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8437     avg: 8639     median: 8655 (52%)     max: 8797 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48553     avg: 53517     median: 53766 (39%)     max: 56689 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 89081     avg: 97658     median: 98125 (63%)     max: 103657 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15381     avg: 15748     median: 15797 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 75.7     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 84.742 s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 2.9     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4504     median: 4759 (8%)     max: 4859 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78634     median: 80868 (46%)     max: 84735 MIPS
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6178     median: 6179 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 144.9     avg: 167.2     median: 169.8 (4%)     max: 185.1 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300     avg: 309.4     median: 306 (8%)     max: 330 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.5     median: 26.3 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (47%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.1     avg: 15.5     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 208     avg: 237     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 155.2     median: 147.5 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16239     median: 16471.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.482 s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 18.6     median: 17.8 (1%)     max: 22.248 s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 73048     median: 75346 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20590     median: 20813 (51%)     max: 24599 Points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 62767     median: 63723.5 (52%)     max: 76578 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 64270     median: 66513.5 (54%)     max: 77375 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 63261     median: 64870 (52%)     max: 76518 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19505     median: 19578 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 30155     median: 30474.5 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
+ 32 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10471     median: 10581.5 (45%)     max: 12293 Points
+ 30 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2780     avg: 2888     median: 2884 (67%)     max: 2965 points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 14661     median: 15043 (58%)     max: 16311 points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2751     median: 2764 (88%)     max: 2844 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12289     avg: 13856     median: 14161 (58%)     max: 15017 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2089     median: 2097 (71%)     max: 2175 points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14325     median: 14477.5 (26%)     max: 16322 points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1935     median: 1934.5 (8%)     max: 2041 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14250     median: 14282 (45%)     max: 15009 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 7969     median: 7818 (78%)     max: 8628 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52918     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 307.8     avg: 436     median: 433.5 (1%)     max: 503 ms
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 112489     median: 122618 (81%)     max: 125813 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 210     avg: 256.8     median: 259 (67%)     max: 345 Points
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 308.4     median: 317 (57%)     max: 363 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1344     avg: 1779     median: 1785 (66%)     max: 2040 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 90.6     median: 93 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 94.6     median: 101.8 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.66     avg: 8.7     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.2 (7%)     max: 12.8 Watt
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 36.1     median: 32.4 (24%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Amazon Logo
  • $1,699.99
    GIGABYTE AERO X16, Copilot+ PC - 165Hz 2560x1600 WQXGA - Manufactured by NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370-1TB SSD with 32GB DDR5 RAM - Windows 11 Home - Space Gray - 2WHA3USC64AH
  • $1,550.00
    Lenovo 2025 Copilot+ PC ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 Mobile Workstation with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 Processor, 64GB DDR5 Memory, 1TB SSD, 14” WUXGA 500 nits 100% sRGB Non-Touch Display, WiFi 7, Win 11 Pro
  • $1,299.99
    NIMO 17.3" AI Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370(50 Tops NPU), Radeon 890M, 32GB RAM 1TB SSD, DDR5, 144Hz, PD 100W USB-C 4.0, Copilot+ PC AI Laptop with Wi-Fi 6E for Working Business Student
  • $1,299.99
    NIMO Copilot+ PC, 17.3 AI-Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370(50 Tops NPU) Radeon 890M, 32GB DDR5 RAM 1TB SSD, 144Hz, PD 100W USB-C 4.0, Wi-Fi 6E AI Laptop for Mobile Workstation Programmer Business-Gaming
  • $1,379.00
    ASUS 2025 Vivobook S 15.6” 3K 120Hz OLED Laptop 12-Core AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M Graphics 32GB LPDDR5 1TB NVMe SSD USB-C WiFi AX BT Webcam HDMI2.1 RGB Backlit KB Windows 11 Home

v1.35
log 24. 13:55:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jan 2026 05:35:47 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.012s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.018s ... 0.03s

#7 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.079s ... 0.109s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.109s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.237s ... 1.347s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.755s ... 2.102s

#11 return log +0s ... 2.102s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor

蓝宝石边缘人工智能

蓝宝石 Edge AI：搭载 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 和磁性盖子的迷你 PC 回归评测

Sapphire Edge AI 将全新的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与小巧、美观的机箱和多功能连接功能结合在一起。这里的关键问题是散热系统对强大硬件的处理能力，以及迷你 PC 在日常使用中的效率。我们的测试在大量测量和基准测试的基础上给出了明确的答案。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 430 g
华硕 ProArt P16 5090 评测--串联 OLED 和 RTX 5090 对决Apple MacBook Pro 16

华硕 ProArt P16 5090 评测--串联 OLED 和 RTX 5090 对决Apple MacBook Pro 16

华硕（Asus）正在进行升级，其 ProArt P16 现已推出，配备了极为明亮的串联 OLED 面板和配备 24 GB VRAM 的移动GeForce RTX 5090。这是一款完美的多媒体笔记本电脑，也是Apple'MacBook Pro 16 与 M4 Max 期待已久的 Windows 替代产品吗？...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2 kg
XMG Core 16 M25 评测 - 配备 300 Hz 显示屏和 RTX 5070 的 AMD 游戏笔记本电脑

XMG Core 16 M25 评测 - 配备 300 Hz 显示屏和 RTX 5070 的 AMD 游戏笔记本电脑

XMG Core 16 M25 是一款中端游戏笔记本电脑，可轻松用作办公设备。它的 300 Hz 显示屏由 AMD Zen 5 处理器和全新的GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU 驱动，最高支持 128 GB 内存。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.1 kg
Geekom A9 Max

有史以来最好的 Geekom 迷你 PC？Geekom A9 Max 评测，搭载 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370，售价 999 美元

Geekom A9 Max 将新款 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与时尚、流线型机箱和大量连接功能结合在一起。散热系统如何控制强大的硬件，以及这款迷你电脑在实际使用中的效率如何，这些问题仍然令人兴奋。我们在测试中通过大量的测量和基准测试回答了这些问题。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 709 g
Tuxedo Infinity Book Pro 14 Gen10 评论 - 配备 AMD Zen 5 和 128 GB 内存的 Linux 超极本

Tuxedo Infinity Book Pro 14 Gen10 评论 - 配备 AMD Zen 5 和 128 GB 内存的 Linux 超极本

Linux 超极本 Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 现已推出，配备 AMD Zen 5 处理器和可升级内存。除了良好的维护选项和众多端口外，120 Hz 的屏幕现在更亮了一些。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 14.00" | 1.5 kg

GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT: AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, 0.7 kg
  Review » GMK AD-GP1 Radeon RX 7600M XT 扩展坞评测：使用简单但老化速度快

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑几乎与 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑一样快 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 评测

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 4K OLED 被 120 Hz 2.8K OLED 取代 - 华硕 ProArt P16 配 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑评测

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 14 英寸GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 评论

Acemagic F3A: AMD Radeon 890M, 1 kg
  Review » 搭载 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、价格不到 700 美元的经济型迷你 PC - Acemagic F3A 的详细评测

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 的最轻薄游戏笔记本 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 与 Razer Blade 16 对比

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Radeon 890M, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » 框架笔记本 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 评测：跳过英特尔版本，获得更佳性能

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 评测--游戏笔记本电脑现在配备GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和更轻薄的机箱

  Review » NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑分析--速度更快，但还有更多惊喜等着你

ONEXPLAYER X1 Pro GA15H-HX370-32GB-1TB-H: AMD Radeon 890M, 10.95", 0.9 kg
  Review » XL 游戏掌上电脑、平板电脑和笔记本电脑：OneXplayer X1 Pro 评论

Minisforum AI X1 Pro: AMD Radeon 890M, 1.4 kg
  Review » Minisforum AI X1 Pro 评测：适用于办公、多媒体、游戏和创意任务的全能迷你 PC

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  Review » 华硕 TUF Gaming A16 评论：酷炫、安静、经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑，弱点突出但可行

GMK EVO-X1: AMD Radeon 890M, 0.6 kg
  Review » GMKtec EVO-X1 mini PC 评测：采用 Oculink 和 Ryzen AI 9 的全新盒式设计

GPD Pocket 4: AMD Radeon 890M, 8.80", 0.8 kg
  Review » GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 掌上电脑评测：小巧、快速、可爱

Minisforum EliteMini AI370: AMD Radeon 890M, 0.5 kg
  Review » Minisforum EliteMini AI370 评测：采用 AMD Zen 5 Strix Point APU 的迷你 PC 树立了新标准

Beelink SER9: AMD Radeon 890M, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER9 评测：AMD Zen 5 让这款迷你电脑比以往更快

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Radeon 890M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 华硕 VivoBook S 14 OLED 笔记本电脑评测：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的成功表现

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 华硕 TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV 评测：Zen 5 Ryzen 9 继续给人留下深刻印象

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 的超薄游戏笔记本电脑

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 华硕 ProArt P16 笔记本电脑评测 - AMD Zen 5 与 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑和 4K OLED 的完美结合

  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: AMD Radeon 890M
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Radeon 890M
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » 华硕 ProArt PX13 评测--搭载 AMD Zen 5 和 RTX 4070 的全球最快 13.3 英寸二合一笔记本电脑

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook S 16 笔记本电脑评测--首款在 1.3 厘米厚的外壳内搭载 AMD Zen 5 的 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606WW

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ProArt P16 H7606WX

MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG

MSI Creator A16 AI+ A3HVFG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Creator A16 AI+ A3HVFG

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XWGG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XWGG

Gigabyte Aero X16 2WHA: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 2WHA

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XWHG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XWHG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW

MSI Stealth A18 AI+ A3XWHG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A18 AI+ A3XWHG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403WR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403WR

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Radeon 890M, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306WU, HX 370: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306WU, HX 370

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVGG, HX 370: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVGG, HX 370

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV

Asus Vivobook S 16 M5606W: AMD Radeon 880M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 16 M5606W

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306, RTX 4060

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Radeon 890M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606

Asus ProArt P16 H7606: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Radeon 890M, 13.50", 1.3 kg
   » 仅一周后，Framework 笔记本电脑再次提价

Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Radeon 890M, 0.4 kg
   » 蓝宝石 Edge AI 评测：搭载人工智能和 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的迷你 PC 复出

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
   » 华硕与联想：谁拥有最好的串联式 OLED 显示屏？

   » 配备 Tandem OLED 显示屏的全新华硕 ProArt P16 是您目前能买到的最佳多媒体笔记本电脑

Schenker XMG Core 16 M25: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » XMG 的酷睿 16 M25 AMD 是一款适合游戏和工作的全能机型

   » 谁能以 2200 欧元的价格提供更好的 RTX 5070 游戏笔记本电脑？ - XMG Core 16 对比华硕 TUF Gaming A16

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
   » 华硕 ProArt P16 预览版 - 现配备 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和 Lumina Pro OLED

Tuxedo Infinity Book Pro 14 Gen10 AMD: AMD Radeon 890M, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 快速的 AMD 处理器、高达 128 GB 的内存和 Linux - InfinityBook Pro 14 在我们的评测中给人留下了良好印象

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 评论：功能强大，但速度仍慢于较小的 G14 同类产品

   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 是无与伦比的，因为 Razer Blade 14 只能使用 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 华硕只为 ProArt P16 提供 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑是个错误。

   » 华硕 ProArt P16 发布，配备 OLED 触摸屏、最高 64GB 内存和 RTX 5070

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14：最快的 14 英寸游戏机，却没有 5090，错失良机

ONEXPLAYER X1 Pro GA15H-HX370-32GB-1TB-H: AMD Radeon 890M, 10.95", 0.9 kg
   » OneXplayer X1 Pro：打了类固醇的任天堂 Switch

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Radeon 890M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (S5606CA) 发布，配备最新英特尔酷睿 Ultra 200H Arrow Lake 移动 CPU 和 Lumina OLED 显示屏

   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (M506KA) 和 Vivobook S 14 (M5406WA) 首次亮相，配备全新 AMD Krackan Point APU 和 OLED 显示屏

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Radeon 890M
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Strix / Gorgon Point

» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
   8x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450
   8x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440
   6x 2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
   6x 2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
   6x 2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 7 445
   6x 2 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 5 435
   6x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435
   6x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 5 430
   4x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 5 330
   4x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-14650HX
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13700HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-01- 8)