华硕 TUF Gaming A16 笔记本电脑评测：2,200 欧元豪赌 Zen 4 Hawk Point 和 RTX 5070

Name: Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP
Brand: Asus

165 Hz、Advanced Optimus 和 G-Sync。

华硕为 TUF Gaming A16 配备了先进的 Optimus 和 G-Sync 等众多功能，但 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑搭配的是基于较旧 Zen 4 架构的 AMD Ryzen 7 260 Hawk Point APU。这对游戏性能有何影响，2199 欧元的售价是否合适？让我们一探究竟。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 09/26/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Blackwell RTX 5000 Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows Zen 4

结论华硕 TUF Gaming A16 现在拥有更好的显示屏和更快的图形处理器

华硕为其 16 英寸 TUF Gaming A16 游戏笔记本带来了多项改进，尤其是显示屏，现在还可以轻松升级内存。GPU 采用了全新的 Nvidia Blackwell 代处理器，以及 GeForce RTX 5070 笔记本电脑即使在 QHD 分辨率下也能播放当前大多数游戏，不过由于 8GB VRAM 较低，可能会有一些限制。

不过，处理器的选择对我们来说并没有直接意义。AMD Ryzen 7 260 基于 Zen 4 架构，并不算新，这也会对某些游戏的性能产生负面影响。在这一点上，TUF Gaming A16 似乎有些不平衡。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

这幅图也是功能方面的延续。如前所述，它有良好的维护选项和其他有用的功能，如 G-Sync 和高级 Optimus 图形切换，但你不得不放弃 USB 4 或 Wi-Fi 7。尽管如此，输入设备还是很舒适的，电池续航时间也非常不错。

总而言之，新款 TUF Gaming A16 是一款不错的游戏笔记本电脑，但售价也相当高，达到了 2200 欧元。目前，我们的竞争对手 XMG Core 16 的价格要便宜 300 欧元左右，配备了更先进的 Zen 5 处理器和 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑，内存规格也与之相当。

Pros

+ 坚固的外壳

+ 良好的维护选项（现在可升级内存）

+ 舒适的输入设备

+ 快速的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑 GPU

+ 改进的 WQHD 面板，165 Hz，色彩准确

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 在 Turbo 模式下声音非常大

- 既没有 USB 4.0，也没有 Wi-Fi 7

- 老旧的 Zen 4 处理器

价格和供应情况

华硕 TUF Gaming A16 的评测配置可直接从华硕商店订购，价格为 2,199 欧元。.

在美国亚马逊上，配备 Ryzen 9 290、RTX 5070 笔记本电脑和 FHD+ 165 Hz 显示屏的华硕 TUF Gaming A16售价为 1,779 美元。

$1,779.00

ASUS TUF A16 Copilot+ Gaming Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 270, 32 GB DDR5 RAM, 1 TB PCle SSD, 16" FHD+ (1920x1200) 165Hz Display, Nvidia G-Force RTX 5070, 1-Zone RGB Keyboard, W11 Home, Jaegar Gray

结论华硕 TUF Gaming A16 现在拥有更好的显示屏和更快的图形处理器
规格
底盘和设备：制造质量良好，有足够的维护选项
输入设备舒适的键盘
显示屏165 Hz QHD，G-Sync，无 PWM
性能：鹰点禅 4 遇上布莱克威尔
排放与能源：表面温度低，电池寿命长
Notebookcheck 对华硕 TUF Gaming A16 的总体印象
潜在竞争对手比较

华硕推出的 TUF Gaming A16 是一款 16 英寸游戏笔记本，配备了新的 GeForce RTX 5070 笔记本电脑与快速的 165 Hz 显示屏配合使用。

不过，为了降低成本，华硕使用了 AMD 较旧的 Zen 4 处理器。我们测试设备的零售价为 2199 欧元，可获得 Ryzen 7 260APU 、32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘、RTX 5070 笔记本 GPU 和 165 Hz WQHD 面板。

这是一个正确的选择，还是放弃某些功能而选择当前的处理器会更好？

规格

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (TUF Gaming A16 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 260 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Graphics adapter

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2707 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 115 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 580.97, Advanced Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 64 GB

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, MNG007DA5-3, IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz, Adaptive Sync

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, 1024 GB

, 859 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo

Networking

Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 25.7 x 354 x 269

Battery

90 Wh, 5650 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 240W PSU, Armoury Crate, XBox PC Game Pass (one month), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.213 kg, Power Supply: 748 g

Price

2199 Euro

Amazon

$1,779.00

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

底盘和设备：制造质量良好，有足够的维护选项

TUF Gaming A16 的机箱设计非常低调，由于采用了黑灰色外观，它甚至可以毫无问题地融入专业环境。这也是基于 AMD Strix Point-HX 的 TUF GAMING A16的 TUF Gaming A16 也是如此。

没有 RGB 灯光元素或大型徽标。与更昂贵的 Zephyrus 型号相比，TUF Gaming A16 几乎全部由塑料制成，只有盖子是铝制的。

不过，制造质量完全可以接受，表面对指纹也不是特别敏感。在稳定性方面也没有太多值得批评的地方，我们无法听到任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音。

显示屏铰链调整得非常好，允许 180° 的打开角度。维护选项非常丰富，包括 2 倍内存、2 倍固态硬盘、无线局域网模块和可拆卸电池。这纠正了前代机型采用焊接内存的一大诟病。

接口丰富，但没有 USB 4.0。1080p 网络摄像头（包括用于人脸识别的红外传感器）可拍摄出不错的照片，Wi-Fi 6E 模块可实现较高的传输速率，但没有 Wi-Fi 7。

尺寸比较

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH DIN A4 ❌

左：电源装置、千兆以太网、HDMI 2.1 FRL、USB-C 3.2 Gen2（10 Gbps、DisplayPort 2.1-out）、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（10 Gbps、DisplayPort 2.1-out、G-Sync、Power Delivery 3.0）、USB-A 3.2 Gen2（10 Gbps）、3.5 毫米音频插孔

Networking
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1767 (min: 1659) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1713 (min: 1692) MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	798 (min: 633) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	911 (min: 868) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1360 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1487 (min: 1455) MBit/s ∼87%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1363 (min: 1248) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1555 (min: 875) MBit/s ∼90%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1516 (min: 1419) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1654 (min: 1596) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1804 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1700 (min: 1661) MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1795 (min: 1676) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1719 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1644 (min: 1469) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1585 (min: 1529) MBit/s ∼92%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1767 (1659-1868)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1713 (1692-1729)

ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP: 5.99 ∆E min: 2.16 - max: 11.98 ∆E

输入设备舒适的键盘

键盘上有一个专用数字键盘和几个额外的按键。总体而言，键盘布局没有任何问题，1.7 毫米的超长键程让输入体验非常舒适。

WASD 键的设计略有偏移，在激活单区 RGB 灯光时也能清晰辨认。

13 x 8.5 厘米的大触摸板具有非常好的滑动性能，下部区域的机械咔哒声也不大。不过，触摸板略微偏左，可能需要一些时间来适应。

显示屏165 Hz QHD，G-Sync，无 PWM

分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素的雾面 IPS 面板提供了良好的主观画质，即使是明亮的内容也不会出现颗粒感。165 Hz 的高刷新率以及快速的响应时间和 G-Sync 技术都能让移动设备受益匪浅。此外，也不会出现 PWM 闪烁。

我们确定平均亮度为 450 cd/m²，黑色值为 0.32 cd/m²，因此对比度测量值为 1,500:1。

与更昂贵的 Zephyrus 型号相比，该面板只覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间，而且只有一个单一的色彩配置文件，但这已经是很好的出厂设置了。

我们使用 Portrait Displays 的专业 Calman Ultimate 软件进行分析，结果显示色彩偏差很小，灰阶也没有偏色。我们可以通过自己的校准稍稍改善显示效果，但其实没有必要。


438 cd/m²	461 cd/m²	439 cd/m²
460 cd/m²	480 cd/m²	457 cd/m²
461 cd/m²	466 cd/m²	446 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

MNG007DA5-3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 480 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 456.4 cd/m² Minimum: 479 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Contrast: 1500:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
71.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
97.2% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
CCT: 6620 K

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP MNG007DA5-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 LG Philips 160WQG, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H NE160QDM-NYJ (BOE0C80), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV B160UAN08.1 (AUO9BB0), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH MNG007DA5-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) NE160QDM-NZL, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz
Display		23%	1%	-42%	-1%	5%
Display P3 Coverage (%)	69.4	96.9 40%	69.4 0%	39.8 -43%	68.7 -1%	74.7 8%
sRGB Coverage (%)	97.2	99.8 3%	99.5 2%	59.7 -39%	96.1 -1%	99.8 3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)	71.9	89.7 25%	71.6 0%	41.1 -43%	71.2 -1%	75.4 5%
Response Times		-25%	-87%	-96%	-54%	-40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	6.3 ?(2.8, 3.5)	4.3 ?(1.9, 2.4) 32%	14.3 ?(6.8, 7.5) -127%	13.6 ?(6.6, 7) -116%	12 ?(5.7, 6.3) -90%	10.5 ?(3.4, 7.1) -67%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	4.8 ?(1.7, 3.1)	8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1) -81%	7 ?(2.3, 4.7) -46%	8.4 ?(4.2, 4.2) -75%	5.6 ?(2.1, 3.5) -17%	5.4 ?(1.4, 4) -13%
PWM Frequency (Hz)
Screen		-64%	-105%	-173%	-12%	-34%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	480	493.2 3%	432 -10%	347 -28%	395 -18%	538 12%
Brightness (cd/m²)	456	477 5%	425 -7%	321 -30%	398 -13%	508 11%
Brightness Distribution (%)	91	93 2%	91 0%	88 -3%	97 7%	88 -3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.32	0.5 -56%	0.37 -16%	0.3 6%	0.32 -0%	0.47 -47%
Contrast (:1)	1500	986 -34%	1168 -22%	1157 -23%	1234 -18%	1145 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.4	3.57 -155%	4.76 -240%	5.89 -321%	1.3 7%	1.9 -36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.5	7.03 -181%	8.59 -244%	19.26 -670%	2.8 -12%	4 -60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.3	0.68 48%	1.18 9%	4.3 -231%	1.4 -8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.2	3.7 -208%	6.2 -417%	4.27 -256%	1.8 -50%	2.7 -125%
Gamma	2.16 ^102%	2.16 ^102%	2.079 ^106%	2.47 ^89%	2.2 ^100%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6620 ^98%	5876 ^111%	6690 ^97%	7158 ^91%	6842 ^95%	7027 ^93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-22% / -40%	-64% / -80%	-104% / -134%	-22% / -15%	-23% / -26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.7 ms rise
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
6.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8228 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能：鹰点禅 4 遇上布莱克威尔

测试条件

像往常一样，华硕在 Armoury Crate 软件中提供了各种能耗曲线，我们在下表列出了这些曲线。我们在Turbo 模式下进行了基准测试和测量，以显示最高性能。

能源概况	CPU TDP	CB 2024 Multi	GPU TGP	Time Spy 图形	赛博朋克 2077 QHD	最大风扇容量
静音	65 / 54 W	912 点	65 W	10,722 点	47.8 fps	39.3 dB(A)
性能	80 / 70 W	967 分	95 W	13,842 分	65 fps	46.7 dB(A)
涡轮	80 W	990 分	115 W	14,771 分	69.1 fps	57.1 dB(A)
电池（性能）	75 / 55 W	963 分	42 W	8,895 分	42.9 fps	39.3 dB(A)

处理器AMD Ryzen 7 260

我们的测试设备配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 260(鹰点），它提供 8 个 Zen 4 内核，最高主频可达 5.1 GHz。归根结底，这是一款 Ryzen 7 8845HS的多核性能尚可，尤其是测试设备的 80 W TDP。

不过，与竞争对手相比，单核性能无疑是一个软肋。TUF A16 还可选配 Ryzen 9 8940HX(Zen 4，但有 16 个核心）。

Cinebench R15 多核循环

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2740 (2520.16-2768.93)

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5073 (4910.99-5571.03)

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2234 (2213.12-2280.89)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3434 (3179.65-3495.89)

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2388 (2369.95-2431.91)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5384 (5315.61-5570.25)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	86.4 pt
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	84.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	67.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	66.1 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	56.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	55.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260	55.4 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	49.9 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	36437 Points +111%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	35478 (31087^min - 35478^max) Points +105%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=138, last 2 years)	25192 Points +46%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	23575 Points +36%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	17865 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	17277 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (15864 - 17712, n=3)	16951 Points -2%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	15318 Points -11%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2246 Points +28%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2193 Points +25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2036 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=138, last 2 years)	1980 Points +13%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	1966 Points +12%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	1833 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1760 - 1801, n=3)	1774 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	1760 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14347 Points +112%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	13953 Points +106%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=137, last 2 years)	9695 Points +43%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	9160 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	6770 Points
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	6738 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (6161 - 6969, n=3)	6633 Points -2%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	5896 Points -13%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	861 Points +27%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	846 Points +25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	798 Points +18%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	770 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=137, last 2 years)	763 Points +12%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	705 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (679 - 697, n=3)	689 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	679 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5571 (4910.99^min - 5571.03^max) Points +101%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5570 (5315.61^min - 5570.25^max) Points +101%
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=137, last 2 years)	3897 Points +41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3496 (3179.65^min - 3495.89^max) Points +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	2769 (2520.16^min - 2768.93^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (2564 - 2831, n=3)	2721 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	2432 (2369.95^min - 2431.91^max) Points -12%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	2281 (2213.12^min - 2280.89^max) Points -18%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	335 Points +22%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	328 Points +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	308 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=136, last 2 years)	293 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (275 - 283, n=3)	279 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	275 Points
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	259 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	204 Points -26%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	217 Seconds * -19%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (182 - 204, n=3)	189.7 Seconds * -4%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	182 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	182 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=133, last 2 years)	153.7 Seconds * +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	147 Seconds * +19%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	99 Seconds * +46%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	92 Seconds * +49%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	117523 MIPS +62%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	107286 MIPS +48%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=135, last 2 years)	91742 MIPS +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	80868 MIPS +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	72400 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (63076 - 72888, n=3)	69455 MIPS -4%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	59347 MIPS -18%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	57536 MIPS -21%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	7039 MIPS +15%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6587 MIPS +8%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=135, last 2 years)	6394 MIPS +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (6101 - 6497, n=3)	6346 MIPS +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	6101 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6062 MIPS -1%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	6049 MIPS -1%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	5825 MIPS -5%

Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	20349 Points +53%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	19270 Points +45%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=135, last 2 years)	15645 Points +18%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	14025 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13714 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	13299 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (10180 - 13349, n=3)	12276 Points -8%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	10889 Points -18%

Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3111 Points +16%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3081 Points +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2873 Points +7%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	2863 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3253, n=135, last 2 years)	2781 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	2673 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (2622 - 2683, n=3)	2659 Points -1%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	2498 Points -7%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	23856 Points +95%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	21530 Points +76%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=134, last 2 years)	16800 Points +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	14120 Points +15%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	12426 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	12239 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (9848 - 12597, n=3)	11561 Points -6%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	10255 Points -16%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2252 Points +15%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2243 Points +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2127 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	2115 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=134, last 2 years)	2004 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1948 - 1986, n=3)	1963 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	1954 Points
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	1785 Points -9%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	39.5 fps +85%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	37.3 fps +74%
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=135, last 2 years)	27.1 fps +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	26.3 fps +23%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	22.5 fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	21.4 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (17.6 - 22.4, n=3)	20.5 fps -4%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	16.8 fps -21%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	57.1 s *
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	55.5 s * +3%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	53.9 s * +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (49.6 - 57.1, n=3)	53.7 s * +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	49.1 s * +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	49.1 s * +14%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=134, last 2 years)	47.4 s * +17%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	38.6 s * +32%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H	0.4545 sec * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260	0.4479 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (0.4454 - 0.4479, n=3)	0.4466 sec * -0%
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=136, last 2 years)	0.4279 sec * +4%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4208 sec * +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.409 sec * +9%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	0.4089 sec * +9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4049 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2769 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

144.5 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

275 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

679 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6770 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

17277 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1760 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

104.6 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

990 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	95.6 pt
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	91 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	81.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	77.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	71.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260	69 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	65.7 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	39.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	37537 KRay/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	34660 KRay/s +22%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	32561 KRay/s +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	28399 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=134, last 2 years)	28060 KRay/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (25995 - 29330, n=3)	27908 KRay/s -2%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	27546 KRay/s -3%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	12864 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	175476 Points +50%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	165095 Points +41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	145697 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=134, last 2 years)	126892 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	117226 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (106250 - 121427, n=3)	114968 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	106890 Points -9%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	66256 Points -43%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	8502 MB/s +70%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	7975 MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=134, last 2 years)	5842 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	5824 MB/s +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	5002 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (4682 - 5002, n=3)	4888 MB/s -2%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	4322 MB/s -14%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	2697 MB/s -46%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	134492 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	130726 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=134, last 2 years)	119689 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (115108 - 123832, n=3)	119317 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	119010 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	94638 Points -20%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	76919 Points -35%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	76463 Points -36%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	18877 Points +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	15283 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (14810 - 15328, n=3)	15140 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=134, last 2 years)	14361 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	14115 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	13624 Points -11%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	13428 Points -12%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	8190 Points -46%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	91394 Points +45%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	84624 Points +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77991 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=134, last 2 years)	65338 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	63212 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (56974 - 65308, n=3)	61831 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	57591 Points -9%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	31902 Points -50%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	129264 MB/s +43%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	123278 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=134, last 2 years)	110365 MB/s +22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	90394 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	84817 MB/s -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	81863 MB/s -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (68595 - 90394, n=3)	81318 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	55809 MB/s -38%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	2010 MB/s +93%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1928 MB/s +86%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=134, last 2 years)	1534 MB/s +48%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1530 MB/s +47%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1138 MB/s +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1039 - 1131, n=3)	1074 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1039 MB/s
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	804 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	20330 KRay/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	18545 KRay/s +21%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	17429 KRay/s +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	15351 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (13944 - 15751, n=3)	15015 KRay/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=134, last 2 years)	15013 KRay/s -2%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	14944 KRay/s -3%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	6926 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	52164 MPixel/s +31%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	49214 MPixel/s +23%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	43885 MPixel/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=134, last 2 years)	43301 MPixel/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	39936 MPixel/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	36752 MPixel/s -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (23097 - 40796, n=3)	34610 MPixel/s -13%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	19421 MPixel/s -51%

系统性能

TUF A16 的主观系统性能非常出色，但 Zen 4 处理器的局限性在基准测试中显而易见。

此外，我们无法在测试设备上运行 PCMark 10 测试，因为它反复中止。这可能是由于当前的 Nvidia 驱动程序造成的，但在测试过程中没有出现其他问题。

Performance Rating: Percent
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total

Performance Rating
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	88.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	85.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	75.5 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	70.9 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	68.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	68.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	63.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	63.6 pt

CrossMark / Overall
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	2269 Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2193 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=107, last 2 years)	1991 Points +16%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1816 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1769 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1752 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1712 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1)	1712 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	2173 Points +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2029 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=107, last 2 years)	1870 Points +13%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1781 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1664 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1648 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1)	1648 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1596 Points -3%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2531 Points +35%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	2415 Points +29%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=107, last 2 years)	2222 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2126 Points +13%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1959 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1879 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1)	1879 Points 0%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1847 Points -2%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	2143 Points +47%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1830 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1799 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=107, last 2 years)	1745 Points +20%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1461 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1454 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1)	1454 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1385 Points -5%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	364 Points +23%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	360 Points +21%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	336 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=109, last 2 years)	316 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	297 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1)	297 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	274 Points -8%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	271 Points -9%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	341 Points +43%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	330 Points +38%
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=105, last 2 years)	283 Points +18%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	277 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	271 Points +13%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	260 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	239 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1)	239 Points 0%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	562 ms *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1)	562 ms * -0%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	521 ms * +7%
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=120, last 2 years)	473 ms * +16%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	431 ms * +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	430 ms * +23%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	410 ms * +27%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	405 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	89914 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	85889 MB/s +27%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	77444 MB/s +14%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	73142 MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=134, last 2 years)	71565 MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	67750 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (35899 - 69413, n=3)	57687 MB/s -15%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	31629 MB/s -53%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	99410 MB/s +63%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	97040 MB/s +59%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	85905 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=134, last 2 years)	74340 MB/s +22%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	62290 MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	61170 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (30894 - 61170, n=3)	50937 MB/s -17%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	35115 MB/s -43%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106764 MB/s +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	86401 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	86056 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	84566 MB/s -2%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	78747 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=134, last 2 years)	73027 MB/s -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (42757 - 87114, n=3)	72091 MB/s -17%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	30611 MB/s -65%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	116 ns * -24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	114.6 ns * -22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	105.8 ns * -13%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	103.2 ns * -10%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=134, last 2 years)	101.8 ns * -9%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	97.2 ns * -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	93.8 ns *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (91.5 - 93.8, n=3)	92.5 ns * +1%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准延迟测试（包括上网、4K YouTube 播放和 CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的 TUF Gaming A16 在使用实时音频应用程序时没有出现重大延迟问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4219 μs * -648%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2123.1 μs * -277%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	2079.4 μs * -269%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1758.4 μs * -212%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1437.2 μs * -155%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	563.8 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

TUF A16 为固态硬盘提供了两个 M.2-2280 插槽（PCIe 4.0），我们的测试设备配备了 1 TB 版本的 WD PC SN5000S，可用容量为 859 GB。

性能还算不错，但在持续负载的情况下，硬盘并不能保持完全稳定。尽管如此，顺序值仍然超过 4 GB/s，因此对日常游戏的影响可以忽略不计。

更多固态硬盘基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6384 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5413 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 620 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 508 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 68.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 143.3 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 480 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1178 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	76.2 pt
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	75.1 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	69.9 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	68.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	66.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	49.5 pt
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	43.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	30.2 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5359 (5332.25^min - 5358.62^max) MB/s +212%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	4792 (4766.73^min - 4792.47^max) MB/s +179%
Average of class Gaming (281 - 8300, n=118, last 2 years)	3518 MB/s +105%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2508 (1821.45^min - 2508^max) MB/s +46%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2429 (2393.52^min - 2428.5^max) MB/s +41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2286 (2275.41^min - 2285.85^max) MB/s +33%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (1491 - 3081, n=6)	2204 MB/s +28%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1717 (1605.72^min - 1717.49^max) MB/s
seq write
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	5593 (3454.43^min - 5593.31^max) MB/s +46%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	4147 (3521.83^min - 4147.33^max) MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 9699, n=118, last 2 years)	4000 MB/s +4%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3905 (2240.1^min - 3904.64^max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	3830 (3464.7^min - 3830.45^max) MB/s
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3756 (3683.41^min - 3756.04^max) MB/s -2%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (2391 - 3830, n=6)	2978 MB/s -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2052 (2008.86^min - 2051.64^max) MB/s -46%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	12505 (9384.86^min - 12505.3^max) MB/s +96%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	7030 (6368.69^min - 7030.49^max) MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (2644 - 15056, n=118, last 2 years)	6909 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	6365 (5802.54^min - 6364.58^max) MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (6152 - 6365, n=6)	6298 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4821 (4294.34^min - 4820.52^max) MB/s -24%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4749 (4322.02^min - 4748.79^max) MB/s -25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4129 (3480.85^min - 4128.87^max) MB/s -35%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	7451 (4926^min - 7450.54^max) MB/s +34%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	6529 (6230.01^min - 6528.8^max) MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	5576 (5054.3^min - 5575.91^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (1281 - 13519, n=118, last 2 years)	5491 MB/s -2%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (4556 - 5619, n=6)	5229 MB/s -6%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3915 (3898.36^min - 3915.17^max) MB/s -30%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3873 (3818.91^min - 3872.62^max) MB/s -31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2461 (2329.77^min - 2461.01^max) MB/s -56%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	95.8 (94.49^min - 95.77^max) MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	77.6 (25.64^min - 77.6^max) MB/s +8%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	73 (72.21^min - 73.01^max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	71.9 (71.68^min - 71.87^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (32.2 - 110.2, n=118, last 2 years)	69.3 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	66.5 (65.03^min - 66.52^max) MB/s -8%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (59.1 - 71.9, n=6)	65.3 MB/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	32.9 (32.39^min - 32.88^max) MB/s -54%
4k q1 t1 write
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	345 (334.89^min - 345.07^max) MB/s +140%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	333 (326.87^min - 332.75^max) MB/s +132%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	255 (218.03^min - 254.91^max) MB/s +77%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=118, last 2 years)	215 MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	156.5 (155.62^min - 156.47^max) MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	143.8 (140.01^min - 143.77^max) MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	134.1 (128.03^min - 134.09^max) MB/s -7%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (109.5 - 143.8, n=6)	126.8 MB/s -12%
4k q32 t16 read
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	4034 (4021.16^min - 4033.83^max) MB/s +289%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2919 (2877.27^min - 2918.5^max) MB/s +182%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2793 (2764.32^min - 2793.37^max) MB/s +170%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 8067, n=118, last 2 years)	2568 MB/s +148%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1036 (949.61^min - 1035.55^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	979 (909.81^min - 979^max) MB/s -6%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (669 - 1048, n=6)	826 MB/s -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	539 (525.18^min - 538.76^max) MB/s -48%
4k q32 t16 write
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	3899 (3811.51^min - 3899.28^max) MB/s +757%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3730 (3655.4^min - 3730.3^max) MB/s +720%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3060 (3036.18^min - 3059.66^max) MB/s +573%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 5653, n=118, last 2 years)	2122 MB/s +366%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	563 (543.32^min - 563.01^max) MB/s +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	455 (405.09^min - 455.15^max) MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (310 - 471, n=6)	399 MB/s -12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	291 (277.75^min - 290.51^max) MB/s -36%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	8609 Points +91%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7681 Points +71%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7205 Points +60%
Average of class Gaming (2858 - 13854, n=116, last 2 years)	6912 Points +54%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	6345 Points +41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	4498 Points
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (2174 - 5215, n=6)	3914 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2912 Points -35%
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2867 Points +115%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2727 Points +105%
Average of class Gaming (953 - 4418, n=116, last 2 years)	2378 Points +78%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1964 Points +47%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	1894 Points +42%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	1333 Points
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (951 - 1643, n=6)	1309 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	953 Points -29%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5809 Points +128%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3573 Points +40%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	3554 Points +39%
Average of class Gaming (1375 - 7208, n=116, last 2 years)	3377 Points +32%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2888 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	2553 Points
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (847 - 2955, n=6)	2013 Points -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1546 Points -39%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9199 MB/s +112%
Average of class Gaming (2272 - 9890, n=116, last 2 years)	5264 MB/s +21%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	5151.36 MB/s +19%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (4346 - 4975, n=6)	4717 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	4346 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4042 MB/s -7%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4036.28 MB/s -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3867 MB/s -11%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5793 MB/s +121%
Average of class Gaming (114.5 - 9926, n=116, last 2 years)	3944 MB/s +51%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3558 MB/s +36%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3474.09 MB/s +33%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	3282.92 MB/s +25%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (2254 - 3546, n=6)	2905 MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	2619 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2113 MB/s -19%
4K Read
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	90.83 MB/s +37%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	86.83 MB/s +31%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	82.1 MB/s +24%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 108.4, n=116, last 2 years)	68.5 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	66.2 MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (26.8 - 69.3, n=6)	57.7 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	49.2 MB/s -26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	48.9 MB/s -26%
4K Write
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	294.61 MB/s +88%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	275.03 MB/s +76%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	227 MB/s +45%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	226 MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming (75.6 - 512, n=116, last 2 years)	219 MB/s +40%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	185.9 MB/s +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	156.3 MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (59.6 - 194.7, n=6)	141.2 MB/s -10%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2381 MB/s +186%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2232.85 MB/s +168%
Average of class Gaming (517 - 3630, n=116, last 2 years)	1784 MB/s +114%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	1291.89 MB/s +55%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	995 MB/s +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	832 MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (474 - 1076, n=6)	779 MB/s -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	517 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5004 MB/s +134%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2950.37 MB/s +38%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	2930.89 MB/s +37%
Average of class Gaming (991 - 5909, n=116, last 2 years)	2767 MB/s +30%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2305 MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	2134 MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (562 - 2447, n=6)	1581 MB/s -26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1148 MB/s -46%
Access Time Read
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.111 ms * -106%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (0.034 - 0.181, n=6)	0.09267 ms * -72%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.066 ms * -22%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=116, last 2 years)	0.05653 ms * -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	0.054 ms *
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	0.045 ms * +17%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.036 ms * +33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms * +67%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.099 ms * -230%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070	0.087 ms * -190%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 (0.021 - 0.094, n=6)	0.04467 ms * -49%
Average of class Gaming (0.012 - 0.277, n=116, last 2 years)	0.03907 ms * -30%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.032 ms * -7%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.031 ms * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	0.03 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.016 ms * +47%

* ... smaller is better

磁盘节流：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5192 (4495.04-6341.05)

图形处理器性能

华硕使用 GeForce RTX 5070 笔记本电脑TUF Gaming A16 中使用了高级 Optimus，最大 TGP 为 115 W，即最快的变体。该 GPU 在合成测试中的表现非常出色，是我们目前测试过的速度最快的 RTX 5070 GPU 之一。

不过，相对较弱的 Zen 4 处理器在某些游戏中表现明显，特别是与快速的 HX 系列 CPU 相比。此外，有限的 8 GB VRAM 仍是一个弱点，尤其是当你想以 QHD 分辨率玩游戏时。

不过，原则上，RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的性能也足以满足高细节的需求，当然，根据游戏的不同，还可以进行升频和帧生成。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	100 pt
Average of class Gaming	82.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	82.5 pt
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	76.7 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	76.7 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	72.1 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	69.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	61 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	59337 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (13523 - 76300, n=128, last 2 years)	48564 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	46464 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (40285 - 46464, n=11)	43674 Points -6%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	42223 Points -9%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	41019 Points -12%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	40285 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	36412 Points -22%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	44575 Points +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	37193 Points
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	35646 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (2913 - 62849, n=144, last 2 years)	35604 Points -4%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (31345 - 37331, n=13)	35190 Points -5%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	33771 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	31345 Points -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	27466 Points -26%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	17239 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (2295 - 25763, n=139, last 2 years)	14993 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	14771 Points
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	13976 Points -5%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (11969 - 14771, n=13)	13380 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	12119 Points -18%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	11969 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	10358 Points -30%

3DMark 11 Performance		37035 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		31388 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		13950 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		2952 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		14954 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	21 Seconds * -5%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	21 Seconds * -5%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	20.8 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	20 Seconds *
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (17 - 21, n=11)	19.2 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=131, last 2 years)	19.2 Seconds * +4%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	18 Seconds * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14.1 Seconds * +29%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	43 Seconds * -30%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	35 Seconds * -6%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	34 Seconds * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	33.1 Seconds *
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (30 - 35, n=11)	32 Seconds * +3%
Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=132, last 2 years)	31.8 Seconds * +4%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	30 Seconds * +9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	25.3 Seconds * +24%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core i7-13620H	372 Seconds * -27%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	323 Seconds * -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260	292 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=132, last 2 years)	260 Seconds * +11%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (137 - 372, n=9)	253 Seconds * +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	214 Seconds * +27%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	158 Seconds * +46%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	147 Seconds * +50%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	94.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	92.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	86.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	79.5 pt
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	74.3 pt
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	71.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	66.7 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	129.9 (107.4^min) fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	109.4 (88.6^min) fps
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	102.9 (84.7^min, 80.8^P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 168, n=134, last 2 years)	99.8 fps -9%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	90.1 (73.4^min) fps -18%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	82.4 (56^min) fps -25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75.6 (62.9^min) fps -31%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	157 fps +23%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	140.8 fps +10%
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=98, last 2 years)	134.2 fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	127.5 fps
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	109.4 fps -14%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	103.5 (42^min, 54.2^P0.1, 81.7^P1) fps -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	99 fps -22%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	161 fps +29%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	156.4 (3.01^min, 100^P1) fps +25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	124.8 (4.67^min, 90.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=122, last 2 years)	124 fps -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	114 (4.02^min, 71.4^P1) fps -9%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	111.8 (3.87^min, 83.3^P1) fps -10%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	102.5 (29.8^min, 66.7^P1) fps -18%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	150.7 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	147.8 fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	142.3 fps
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=131, last 2 years)	136.1 fps -4%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	119.5 fps -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	102.5 fps -28%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	96 fps -33%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=121, last 2 years)	262 fps +20%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	259 (107.2^min, 194.8^P1) fps +18%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	234 (141.3^min, 180^P1) fps +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	219 (128^min, 164.3^P1) fps
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	203 (108.3^min, 150.5^P1) fps -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	191.9 (103.2^min, 137.2^P1) fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	136.4 (91.5^min, 97.9^P1) fps -38%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	184 (156.1^min) fps +49%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	174.8 (148.4^min) fps +42%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=134, last 2 years)	154.5 fps +25%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	148.7 (124.4^min) fps +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	136.2 (117.8^min) fps +11%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	131.9 (113.9^min) fps +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	123.2 (104.7^min) fps

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	117.5 fps +46%
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	116.1 fps +44%
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 150.2, n=137, last 2 years)	104.3 fps +29%
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	99.4 fps +23%
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	83.7 fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	80.7 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	69.9 fps -13%

赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高帧频图

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø110.2 (104.1-111)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD DLSS	QHD
GTA V (2015)				124.8		113.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	148.8	140.9	129.3	123.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	216	187.8	142.3			107.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	108.2	97.9	80.7
Strange Brigade (2018)	260	253	241	219		175.3
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	181.7	152.9	134.5	127.5		89
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	148.7	142.6	121.2	109.4	81	68.2
F1 24 (2024)			234	88.8	85.4	56.9

排放与能源：表面温度低，电池寿命长

噪音排放

两个风扇的音量在很大程度上取决于所选择的能量曲线。在 "涡轮增压 "模式下，即使在空转时，双风扇的转速也始终保持在 32 dB(A) 左右。

如果你不需要全部性能，就一定要使用其中一个较弱的配置文件。涡轮模式的噪音也非常大，游戏时约为 54 dB(A)，压力测试时为 57 dB(A)。

总体而言，性能模式的最大声压级（SPL）为 46.7 dB(A)，似乎更令人愉悦。测试设备上没有其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		32.2 / 32.2 / 32.2 dB(A)
Load		38.1 / 57.1 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.1 dB(A)

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
Noise		16%	3%	23%	16%	9%
off / environment * (dB)	25.1	23.7 6%	24 4%	23 8%	23.9 5%	23.3 7%
Idle Minimum * (dB)	32.2	23.9 26%	25 22%	23 29%	23.9 26%	25 22%
Idle Average * (dB)	32.2	23.9 26%	26 19%	23 29%	23.9 26%	25 22%
Idle Maximum * (dB)	32.2	26.1 19%	27 16%	29.11 10%	23.9 26%	25 22%
Load Average * (dB)	38.1	26.8 30%	54 -42%	31 19%	33.2 13%	45.5 -19%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)	53.9	51.8 4%	54 -0%	36.23 33%	50.2 7%	53.3 1%
Load Maximum * (dB)	57.1	58 -2%	55 4%	39.44 31%	50.2 12%	53.3 7%

* ... smaller is better

表面温度

风扇声音大，表面温度低。即使在压力测试期间，也只有少数地方的温度略高于 40 °C，因此在使用过程中没有任何限制。

在压力测试期间，CPU 的功率稳定在 45 W（80 °C），GPU 的功率略低于 115 W（85 °C）。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


36.5 °C	39.5 °C	37.1 °C
32.9 °C	39.2 °C	38.8 °C
26.6 °C	26.4 °C	27.2 °C

Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 33.8 °C


45.1 °C	43.1 °C	43.6 °C
39.1 °C	40.4 °C	32.4 °C
25.3 °C	25.4 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 35.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


25.3 °C	25.5 °C	25 °C
25.6 °C	25.7 °C	25 °C
24.1 °C	24.5 °C	24.5 °C

Maximum: 25.7 °C
Average: 25 °C


25.3 °C	25.3 °C	25.5 °C
24.8 °C	25.1 °C	25.3 °C
23.9 °C	24.1 °C	24.3 °C

Maximum: 25.5 °C
Average: 24.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


35.5 °C	39 °C	36.4 °C
31.6 °C	37.6 °C	36.8 °C
25.9 °C	25.6 °C	25.8 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 32.7 °C


43.5 °C	42.2 °C	42.5 °C
36.8 °C	37.8 °C	31.9 °C
24.1 °C	24.6 °C	24.5 °C

Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 34.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.7 °C / 3 F).

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
Heat		-13%	-26%	-1%	-10%	-239%
Maximum Upper Side * (°C)	39.5	51 -29%	50 -27%	38 4%	43.3 -10%	43.2 -9%
Maximum Bottom * (°C)	45.1	45.6 -1%	49 -9%	37 18%	50.3 -12%	46 -2%
Idle Upper Side * (°C)	25.7	29.8 -16%	35 -36%	28 -9%	27 -5%	27.7 -8%
Idle Bottom * (°C)	25.5	27.4 -7%	34 -33%	30 -18%	28.3 -11%	264 -935%

* ... smaller is better

扬声器

两个立体声扬声器整体表现不错，但在游戏时无法盖过响亮的风扇。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源消耗

TUF Gaming A16 闲置时的功耗为 10 W，相当经济；游戏时的功耗预计在 200 W 左右。

在压力测试中，我们一开始测得的功耗高达 235 W，但很快就降到了 210 W 左右。

因此，附带的 240 W 电源足以在压力下为笔记本供电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.07 / 0.13 Watt
Idle	4.6 / 9.8 / 10.2 Watt
Load	76.1 / 235.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
Power Consumption		-114%	-22%	-10%	6%	-60%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	4.6	20.1 -337%	9 -96%	6.8 -48%	5.8 -26%	11.7 -154%
Idle Average * (Watt)	9.8	27.6 -182%	11 -12%	12.7 -30%	10.9 -11%	16.6 -69%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	10.2	31.8 -212%	23 -125%	15.2 -49%	11.2 -10%	17.1 -68%
Load Average * (Watt)	76.1	102.7 -35%	91 -20%	85 -12%	91.3 -20%	122.4 -61%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)	198.1	192.3 3%	130 34%	143 28%	117.9 40%	241 -22%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)	198.9	217 -9%	132.5 33%	145 27%	123.8 38%	245 -23%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	235.2	292 -24%	155 34%	199 15%	155.3 34%	291.5 -24%

* ... smaller is better

耗电量：赛博朋克 2077 / 压力测试

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø206 (191.6-235)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.91 (3.64-13.6)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø198.9 (188-207)

耗电量：外部显示器

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø130.4 (125.4-131.9)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø125.5 (124.1-126.7)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø48.7 (46.8-62.8)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø125 (122.8-126.9)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø149.6 (140.3-157.4)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø27.1 (26.5-29.6)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø198.1 (182.5-212)

电池寿命

低功耗和 90 瓦时大容量电池的组合使电池的运行时间更长。

在亮度为 150 cd/m²（Windows 滑盖为 55%）和 60 Hz 刷新率的条件下，我们测得的运行时间略低于 13 小时，在全亮度条件下接近 9 小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		12h 58min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		8h 56min

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 96 Wh	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 99.8 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-67%	-41%	9%	-31%	-30%	-46%
WiFi Websurfing (h)	13	4.3 -67%	7.7 -41%	14.2 9%	8.6 -34%	9.1 -30%	6.62 ?(1.417 - 14.8, n=117, last 2 years) -49%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (h)	8.9				6.5 -27%	6.2 -30%	5.12 ?(2.35 - 8.93, n=35, last 2 years) -42%

Notebookcheck 对华硕 TUF Gaming A16 的总体印象

华硕 TUF Gaming A16 配备了 115 瓦 RTX 5070 笔记本图形处理器，可实现快速 QHD 超高清游戏，并提供良好的电池运行时间。不过，考虑到高昂的售价，这款笔记本电脑肯定会采用更先进的 AMD APU。

Back to the verdict

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP - 09/23/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

88%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

66 / 80 → 82%

Weight

62 / 10-68 → 89%

Battery

88 / 95 → 92%

Display

80%

Games Performance

90%

Application Performance

86%

AI Performance

96%

Temperature

91 / 95 → 95%

Noise

57 / 90 → 63%

Audio

85%

Camera

35 / 75 → 46%

Average

63%

84%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
91.9%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 34%

潜在竞争对手比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Height	Display
1. 83.8%	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $1,779.00 List Price: 2199€	2.2 kg	25.7 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
2. 84.9%	Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory	Amazon: $2,589.00 List Price: 1800 USD	2.5 kg	23.4 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
3. 80.1%	Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $1,099.99 GIGABYTE - Gaming A16 Gaming... 2. Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 3. Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 1700 EUR	2.3 kg	23 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
4. 83%	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $1,599.00 List Price: 1399 Euro	2.2 kg	25.7 mm	16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS
5. 83.7%	Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $1,599.99 GIGABYTE AERO X16; Copilot+ ... 2. $1,199.99 GIGABYTE AERO X16; Copilot+ ... 3. Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1799€	2 kg	19.9 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
6. 87.4%	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $63.29 atFoliX Plastic Glass Protec... 2. $69.49 atFoliX Screen Protection Fi... 3. $69.49 atFoliX Screen Protector com... List Price: 2480€	2.5 kg	26.5 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	988
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	989
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	989
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	990
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	991
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	991
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	991
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	36864
Minisforum MS-S1 Max Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S	37011
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	37012
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	37035
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	37061
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	37247
R9 5900X, Radeon RX 6800	37402
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论华硕 TUF Gaming A16 现在拥有更好的显示屏和更快的图形处理器

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

底盘和设备：制造质量良好，有足够的维护选项

尺寸比较

输入设备舒适的键盘

显示屏165 Hz QHD，G-Sync，无 PWM

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能：鹰点禅 4 遇上布莱克威尔

测试条件

处理器AMD Ryzen 7 260

Cinebench R15 多核循环

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

磁盘节流：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8

图形处理器性能

赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高帧频图

排放与能源：表面温度低，电池寿命长

噪音排放

表面温度

扬声器

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP audio analysis

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 audio analysis

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H audio analysis

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH audio analysis

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) audio analysis

能源消耗

耗电量：赛博朋克 2077 / 压力测试

耗电量：外部显示器

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 对华硕 TUF Gaming A16 的总体印象

潜在竞争对手比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency