评语--预算有限，但创意无限？
华硕在 A18 上所做的一切很有意思：作为一款 18 英寸的游戏笔记本电脑，它相对轻薄，设计简洁，电池续航时间出色，即使在性能模式下噪音也很低，令人印象深刻。显示屏让我们有些纠结--300尼特的sRGB面板并不令人兴奋，但校准效果很好。尽管打着经济实惠的 TUF 品牌，华硕是否在试图吸引创意人士？
如果你想获得与竞争机型相同的 3D 性能，切换到 Turbo 模式是必要的，但这也会导致噪音和功耗飙升。如果你愿意放弃一些 FPS，你将得到一台非常安静、高效的台式机替代机型，但它并不能掩盖其在各方面的预算优势。
Pros
+ 纤薄轻巧
+ 校准显示屏：DeltaE < 1
+ 非常安静
+ 非常高效
+ 电池寿命长
Cons
- 1200p 显示屏，300 尼特
- 网络摄像头模糊
- 不舒适的点击按钮
- 固态硬盘长时间运行会跳动
- 价格昂贵
$249.00
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM 24.5” Monitor, 1080P Full HD (1920 x 1080), Fast IPS, 280Hz, G-SYNC Compatible, Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync,1ms, DisplayHDR 400, Eye Care, DisplayPort HDMI BLACK
- $149.00ASUS TUF Gaming 24” (23.8 inch viewable) 1080P Monitor (VG249Q3A) - Full HD, 180Hz, 1ms, Fast IPS, Extreme Low Motion Blur, FreeSync Premium, Speakers, DisplayPort, HDMI, Variable Overdrive, 99% sRGB
华硕 TUF Gaming A18 是今年的全新产品，取代了去年的 A17.仅需 2000 多欧元，华硕就为其配备了 RTX 5070和 AMD Ryzen 7 260装进了一个 18 英寸的大机箱。
规格
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W (TUF Gaming A18 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 260 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 115 W TDP, Geforce 577 Studio, Advanced Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, 2x 16 GB Micron DDR5-5600
Display
18.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 126 PPI, NE180WUM-NY3 (BOE0CEF), IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
SK hynix HFS001TEM9X174N, 1024 GB
, 860 GB free
Weight
2.6 kg
Price
2199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
底盘和功能 - 比刀锋 18 更薄
华硕采用银灰色塑料外壳。黑色底座并不十分坚硬，但在打字时仍能保持稳定。设计低调，机身纤薄，考虑到 18 英寸的外形，重量相对较轻。盖子可完全打开 180 度。
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1781 (1662-1860)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø950 (517-1033)
Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1216 (1044-1321)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1701 (867-1743)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1299 (1003-1452)
Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1416 (1234-1467)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1737 (1595-1865)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1746 (1671-1824)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (607-761)
Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø658 (433-746)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1524 (1324-1661)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1713 (873-1762)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1714 (1645-1732)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø685 (511-802)
Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø798 (627-834)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1491 (1392-1518)
网络摄像头
全高清网络摄像头可提供明显模糊的图像，但色彩尚可。
5.8 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
输入设备 - 喜忧参半
尽管尺寸宽大，但安静键却偏小。虽然方向键略显拥挤，但至少不是半高。常用的删除键的位置让人感觉很别扭，而四个专用功能键则是一个很好的点缀。键程很浅，但反馈还可以接受。
大触摸板（约 15 × 9.9 厘米）滑动顺畅，但实体按键既僵硬又有点发软，影响了实用性。
显示屏 - 300 尼特 IPS
300 尼特 IPS 雾面面板只能勉强覆盖 sRGB 色彩空间。即使是其他经济型设备，如 卡塔纳 17都比 A18 的 1,920 × 1,200 分辨率更高，而且通常也更亮。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NE180WUM-NY3 (BOE0CEF) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 351 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 331.6 cd/m² Minimum: 17.3 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 345 cd/m²
Contrast: 1350:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.89 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 0.93
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.46 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
67.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
CCT: 7132 K
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W NE180WUM-NY3 (BOE0CEF), IPS, 1920x1200, 18", 144 Hz | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 NE180QDM-NZC, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW BOE NE180QDM-NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 BOE NE180QAM-NZ2, IPS, 3840x2400, 18", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop NE180QAM-NZ1, IPS, 3840x2400, 18", 240 Hz | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK CSOT MNH301CA3-1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz | HP Omen 17z-db100 BOE0B67, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 25% | 23% | 24% | 24% | 24% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 69.3 | 99.4 43% | 98 41% | 96 39% | 97 40% | 97.3 40% | 66.6 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.1 | 100 2% | 100 2% | 100 2% | 100 2% | 99.6 2% | 96.8 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 67.9 | 87.7 29% | 86.1 27% | 88.8 31% | 89 31% | 89 31% | 68.6 1% |
| Response Times | 48% | 21% | 2% | 46% | 24% | -49% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 8 ? | 3.8 ? 52% | 4.7 ? 41% | 9.7 ? -21% | 5.1 ? 36% | 5.2 ? 35% | 15.1 ? -89% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 10.4 ? | 5.8 ? 44% | 10.3 ? 1% | 7.8 ? 25% | 4.6 ? 56% | 9.2 ? 12% | 11.3 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | |||||||
| Screen | 32% | -3% | 11% | 11% | 10% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 351 | 582 66% | 581.4 66% | 479.7 37% | 545 55% | 296 -16% | 373.2 6% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 332 | 557 68% | 534 61% | 465 40% | 510 54% | 272 -18% | 341 3% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 89 | 93 4% | 84 -6% | 86 -3% | 86 -3% | 87 -2% | 84 -6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.26 | 0.4 -54% | 0.46 -77% | 0.27 -4% | 0.41 -58% | 0.27 -4% | 0.62 -138% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1350 | 1455 8% | 1264 -6% | 1777 32% | 1329 -2% | 1096 -19% | 602 -55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.89 | 1.4 52% | 3.89 -35% | 3.14 -9% | 2.2 24% | 1.35 53% | 2.53 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.91 | 3.4 57% | 7.94 -0% | 6.48 18% | 5.8 27% | 4.76 40% | 5.03 36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.93 | 0.7 25% | 0.97 -4% | 1.17 -26% | 1.1 -18% | 0.78 16% | 1.39 -49% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.46 | 1.8 60% | 5.6 -26% | 3.8 15% | 3.5 22% | 2.7 39% | 4.1 8% |
| Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.24 98% | 2.1 105% | 2.18 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.201 100% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 7132 91% | 6633 98% | 6835 95% | 7301 89% | 7027 93% | 6770 96% | 6257 104% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 35% /
33% | 14% /
6% | 12% /
13% | 27% /
19% | 19% /
15% | -23% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱后，色彩和灰度精确度相差甚远。幸运的是，面板的校准效果非常好，DeltaE 值低于 1。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
室外可视性可从更高的亮度和对比度中受益，但在阴凉处也能使用。
性能 - 弱性能模式
配备 AMD Ryzen 7 260, RTX 507032 GB 内存和 sRGB 显示屏，A18 被设计为一款游戏笔记本电脑，可以在原始分辨率和高设置下流畅运行当前所有游戏。
测试条件
我们使用了 Armoury Crate 中的 "性能 "预设模式（静音、性能、涡轮增压、手动）。下文将详细介绍。华硕默认运行着大量后台进程和应用程序。
| 运行模式 | Cinebench R15 | CPU 运行模式 | Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra | GPU 运行模式 | Lautstärke Cyberpunk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo | 2,783 | 80 W | 91.7 fps | 82 W | 54.79 dB |
| 性能 | 2,756 | 80，降至 70 W | 90.7 fps | 83 W | 45.13 dB |
| 安静 | 2,554 | 65，降至 55 W | 87.8 fps | 77 W | 33.43 dB |
处理器
......（英文 AMD Ryzen 7 260配备 8 个内核和 16 个线程。性能稳定，但很容易被 Ryzen 9 9955HX在 G18或英特尔酷睿 Ultra 200 系列处理器。涡轮增压模式几乎无法提高 CPU 的输出功率。
使用电池时，系统会自动切换到刷新率为 60 Hz 的静音模式。手动切换回 "性能 "模式后，Cinebench R15 分数与插电时相同。
Cinebench R15 多回路
Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Performance Mode AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2738 (2693.06-2765.87)
Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode : Ø2796 (2775.27-2815.12)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2777 (2734.48-2831.06)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX: Ø5642 (5588.93-5904.93)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5222 (5148.67-5245.9)
HP Omen 17z-db100 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2635 (2590.84-2656.4)
Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø3605 (3531.07-4247.64)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX: Ø4910 (4795.01-5190.09)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (15864 - 17712, n=4) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1760 - 1801, n=4) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (6161 - 6969, n=4) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (679 - 697, n=4) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (2564 - 2831, n=4) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (275 - 283, n=4) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (182 - 204, n=4) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (63076 - 73490, n=4) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (6101 - 6528, n=4) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (10180 - 13349, n=4) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3253, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (2622 - 2686, n=4) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (9848 - 12597, n=4) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1905 - 1986, n=4) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (17.6 - 22.4, n=4) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (49.6 - 63.5, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (0.4446 - 0.4479, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (25995 - 29330, n=4) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 238426, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (106250 - 121427, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 9817, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (4682 - 5026, n=4) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (115108 - 123832, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 173351, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (14810 - 15497, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 128721, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (56974 - 65308, n=4) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (68595 - 91093, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1039 - 1133, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (13944 - 15751, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (23097 - 40796, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
系统性能
在我们的基准测试排名中，A18 名列最后。主观感觉上，系统通常感觉流畅，但并非总是如此--我们在插入 HDMI 时经历了一次意外重启，在测试过程中系统两次出现反应迟钝。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 -3! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode -4! | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9647, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (8840 - 12600, n=124, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1712 - 1758, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1648 - 1661, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1879 - 1986, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1441 - 1454, n=2) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (288 - 297, n=2) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (239 - 239, n=2) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (562 - 565, n=2) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7645 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (35899 - 69413, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (30894 - 61170, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (42757 - 87114, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (91.5 - 93.8, n=4) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latenzy
打开浏览器、多个标签页和 YouTube 都增加了延迟。虽然最终数据较高，但我们的 YouTube 测试显示没有掉帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
1 TB 海力士固态硬盘最初的运行速度相当快，但很快就开始出现热节流现象。总的来说，这是一款速度相对较慢的硬盘。
SK hynix HFS001TEM9X174N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6606 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5823 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
517 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
489 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
72.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
146.1 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
477 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
1217 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W SK hynix HFS001TEM9X174N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5395 (4573.97-6611.06)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6938 (3860.48-7268.31)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6762 (5259.83-6887.53)
HP Omen 17z-db100 TeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4646 (3093.51-5268.52)
Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5502 (3565.79-6900.3)
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6759 (6226.78-6981)
图形处理器性能
理论上 RTX 5070在 A18 中的运行功耗为 100 瓦，再加上 15 瓦的升压功耗。尽管如此，3DMark 分数最终也只能达到平均水平。在 Turbo 模式下，成绩提高了约 8%。
在游戏中，性能表现稳定，但在性能模式下，A18 落后于其他 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑。Turbo 模式可将帧速率提高约 12-16%，使其与竞争对手保持一致。重 CPU 的游戏仍然显示出明显的差距。
不过，在原生分辨率相对较低的情况下，这并不是一个大问题。一个恼人的问题是：当手掌停留在 WASD 上时，经常会触碰到触摸板，因此必须将其禁用。你还需要确保游戏切换到 dGPU - 有时集成的 780M因此 MUX 开关非常有用。
使用电池时，性能模式下的 3D 性能会下降约 30%。
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 -1! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (13523 - 80022, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (36721 - 49568, n=21) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (119532 - 186504, n=12) | |
| Average of class Gaming (84648 - 223650, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6487 - 62849, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (28759 - 38680, n=23) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (2295 - 25984, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (10851 - 14771, n=23) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 35381 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 63766 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 29485 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 13041 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average of class Gaming (37.2 - 246, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 150.2, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 17z-db100 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø87.2 (83.1-88.5)
Asus TUF Gaming A 18 Turbo Mode GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø95.2 (74.1-96)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø94.6 (90.2-96.9)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø96.3 (91-97.6)
HP Omen 17z-db100 Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø96.7 (83-97.7)
Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø89.7 (83.2-91.9)
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø89.2 (84-92.9)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 175.7 | 159 | 107.8 | 107 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 150.9 | 147.5 | 131.2 | 124.9 | ||||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 204 | 156.2 | 123.3 | 93.7 | 53 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 110 | 97.2 | 80.9 | |||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 324 | 274 | 260 | 234 | 229.6 | 89.8 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 172 | 146.6 | 126.7 | 125.7 | 97.7 | 61 | 58.1 | 43.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 140.8 | 120.3 | 104.1 | 93.6 | 68.5 | 60.8 | 26.9 | |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 125.9 | 39.1 | ||||||
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 100 | 93 | 77 | 53 | 40 | 35 | ||
| F1 25 (2025) | 163.8 | 160.3 | 151.5 | 27.2 | 30.9 | 14.3 | 8.3 | 3.07 |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 107.6 | 85.5 | 66.2 | 34.3 | 38.2 | 25.3 | 23.2 |
排放与能源 - 安静、高效
噪音
在空闲状态下，风扇完全关闭，并在加载后迅速停止运转。
总的来说，A18 在性能模式下非常安静，即使在压力下也是如此。如果你愿意放弃一些性能，你的耳朵会感谢你的。不过，在涡轮增压模式下，噪音会从约 45 分贝上升到近 55 分贝，这是一个很大的飞跃。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 32.58 / dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | HP Omen 17z-db100 Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -15% | -12% | -6% | -27% | -36% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23 | 24.6 -7% | 23.1 -0% | 23.4 -2% | 24 -4% | 25 -9% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23 | 24.6 -7% | 27.3 -19% | 23.7 -3% | 25 -9% | 31 -35% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23 | 30 -30% | 27.3 -19% | 23.7 -3% | 26 -13% | 32 -39% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23 | 30 -30% | 27.6 -20% | 26.4 -15% | 32 -39% | 34 -48% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 32.58 | 34.4 -6% | 30.1 8% | 33.7 -3% | 56 -72% | 50 -53% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 45.13 | 49.7 -10% | 54.4 -21% | 49.8 -10% | 55 -22% | 58 -29% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 49.7 | 58.6 | 52.5 | 56 | 59 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下，我们测得的热点温度约为 40°C，尤其是在底部和中央铰链区附近。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+5.9 °C / 10.6 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+5.9 °C / 10.6 F).
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | HP Omen 17z-db100 Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | 1% | 4% | -15% | -26% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 39 | 42.8 -10% | 40.2 -3% | 39.8 -2% | 45 -15% | 52 -33% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 41 | 43.1 -5% | 44 -7% | 47 -15% | 49 -20% | 56 -37% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27 | 26.8 1% | 25.6 5% | 23.2 14% | 32 -19% | 33 -22% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 29 | 26.6 8% | 26.8 8% | 23.2 20% | 31 -7% | 32 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
| CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 3.3 | 1,700 | 68 | 77 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力测试 | 2.3 | 2,372 | 69 | 79 |
发言人
对于一款 18 英寸的笔记本电脑来说，扬声器相当安静，高音均衡，但其他方面并不突出。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.53 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
连接 HDMI 后，dGPU 保持激活状态，空闲功耗跃升至 21 W。在游戏中，A18 非常省电；在 Turbo 模式下，功耗与其他 RTX 5070 型号相当。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.7 Watt |
| Idle | 6.7 / 11.6 / 17.7 Watt |
| Load |
85 / 187 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, SK hynix HFS001TEM9X174N, IPS, 1920x1200, 18" | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | HP Omen 17z-db100 Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, TeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -50% | -53% | -20% | -59% | -38% | -37% | -58% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 6.7 | 13.1 -96% | 8.8 -31% | 6.2 7% | 14.4 -115% | 9.7 -45% | 11.5 ? -72% | 13.6 ? -103% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 11.6 | 20.6 -78% | 14.1 -22% | 19.1 -65% | 17.2 -48% | 15 -29% | 16.5 ? -42% | 19.5 ? -68% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 17.7 | 21.1 -19% | 35.4 -100% | 19.3 -9% | 28 -58% | 23.7 -34% | 22.3 ? -26% | 26.2 ? -48% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 85 | 123.4 -45% | 106.2 -25% | 91 -7% | 158 -86% | 126 -48% | 104 ? -22% | 111.3 ? -31% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 144 | 215 -49% | 233 -62% | 175.9 -22% | 203 -41% | 205 -42% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 139 | 179.2 -29% | 225 -62% | 173 -24% | 199.3 -43% | 202 -45% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 187 | 249.7 -34% | 322.3 -72% | 227.9 -22% | 232 -24% | 227 -21% | 230 ? -23% | 262 ? -40% |
* ... smaller is better
消费赛博朋克 / 压力测试
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø153.2 (142.54-187.17)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.1 (7.941-15.708)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø143.9 (137.71-158.23)
带外部监视器的消耗量
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø119.3 (116.15-131.2)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø117 (109.18-121.86)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø110 (95.68-121.52)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø127.2 (122.86-140.24)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø21 (20.253-22.07)
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø138.8 (135.29-142.19)
电池寿命
90 Wh 的大容量电池可在降低亮度的情况下提供大约 10 到 12 小时的 Wi-Fi 使用时间。
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | HP Omen 17z-db100 Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 83 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 60 Wh | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 75 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | |||||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 11.9 | 7.1 -40% | 10.9 -8% | 8 -33% | 3.1 -74% | 5.1 -57% | 6.71 ? -44% |
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W
- 11/14/2025 v8
Christian Hintze
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.8%  | Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP-S8022W AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $249.00 ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM 24.5... 2. $149.00 ASUS TUF Gaming 24” (23.8 ... List Price: 2199 Euro | 2.6 kg | 26.7 mm | 18.00" 1920x1200 126 PPI IPS |
2. 86.4%  | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,699.99 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... 2. $2,095.00 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... 3. $1,799.99 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... List Price: 2299€ | 2.9 kg | 30.8 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
3. 81.7%  | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,839.99 msi Crosshair 18 HX AI 18" 2... 2. $114.00 Black Laptop 24-Zone RGB Bac... 3. $1,929.00 msi Crosshair 18 HX AI Gamin... List Price: 1700 USD | 3.1 kg | 29.9 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
4. 81.8%  | HP Omen 17z-db100 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 96 GB Memory, 4000 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,999.00 List Price: 1550 USD | 2.9 kg | 30.1 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS |
5. 79.8%  | Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 Intel Core i7-14700HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,149.00 Lenovo LOQ RTX 5050 Pro AI-G... 2. $1,479.00 Lenovo LOQ 17.3 RTX 5060 AI ... 3. $1,149.00 Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 Gaming La... List Price: 1500 EUR | 2.9 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
6. 77.3%  | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK Intel Core i7-14650HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $63.75 240W Gaming Laptop Charger f... 2. $43.69 GVKRLXZ 230W AC Adapter Comp... 3. $12.99 Rujcloud HDMI 2.1 Cable for ... List Price: 1800 EUR | 2.7 kg | 28 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
