Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Intel Ultra 7 255H

英特尔酷睿至尊 7 255H是基于箭湖架构的移动高端 CPU，适用于大型笔记本电脑。它提供 16 个内核，包括 6 个主频高达 5.1 GHz 的快速性能内核（Lion Cove）和 8 个主频高达 4.4 GHz 的小型高效内核（Skymont），以及另外两个主频高达 2.5 GHz 的 "低功耗 "高效内核（Skymont）。CPU 可访问 24 MB 高速缓存，TDP 为 28 瓦（PL1，115 瓦 PL2）。

SoC 集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU，具有 13 个 TOPS (Int8)，可选择支持 vPro Essentials。集成内存控制器支持高达 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 或 DDR5-6400（双通道）。集成图形处理器（iGPU）是一块 英特尔 Arc 140T 图形卡它提供八个 Xe 内核，主频高达 2.25 GHz。

性能 - 高端

酷睿至尊 7 优于顶级型号 酷睿至尊 9 285H仅在最大 Turbo 频率上降低了 200 MHz。由于内核（尤其是高效内核）的 IPC 有所改进，CPU 的性能应略低于旧版的 猛禽湖酷睿 9 270H(6 + 8 核心，最高 5.8 / 4.1 GHz）的水平。这使得该 CPU 非常适合高端游戏和内容创建等要求苛刻的任务。

芯片组设计

与台式机芯片和 HX 芯片一样，Arrow Lake-H 芯片也是基于单个芯片，这些芯片采用 Foveros 3D 封装，置于英特尔提供的 22 纳米基片上。CPU 部分来自台积电，采用现代 N3B（3 纳米）工艺。与 HX 一样，GPU 也在台积电生产，采用 N5P 工艺制造。SoC 和 I/O Tile 也来自台积电，但采用的是较早的 N6 工艺。

CodenameArrow Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow Lake

Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H4.4 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H « 4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Clock Rate4400 - 5100 MHz
Level 2 Cache26 MB
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core
8 x 4.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
Max. Temperature110 °C
GPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2250 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT8
Chip AI96 TOPS INT8
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Starting Price$514 U.S.
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
42.1 pt (70%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
40.7 -3%
Intel Core i7-13700HX
40.9 -3%
Intel Core i9-12950HX
40.9 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
40.9 -3%
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.9 -3%
AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
41 -3%
Intel Core i7-13800H
41.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 0%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
42.1
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.2 0%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
42.3 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
42.6 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
42.8 2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
43.2 3%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 3%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.1 5%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
49.9 19%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 43%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 119     avg: 123.9     median: 124.3 (62%)     max: 128.1 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 750     avg: 1006     median: 1053 (20%)     max: 1201 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16105     avg: 18679     median: 17878 (17%)     max: 22578 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1874     avg: 2060     median: 2063 (84%)     max: 2152 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
1992 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
1992 -3%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2012 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2012 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2013 -2%
Intel Core i7-13800H
2017 -2%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2045 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
2057 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2060
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 0%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2110 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2133 4%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 4%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2154 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2171 5%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2194 7%
...
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 10%
max:
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
2459 19%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 748     avg: 792     median: 796.5 (87%)     max: 826 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6356     avg: 7326     median: 7037 (17%)     max: 8860 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2414     avg: 2878     median: 2836 (18%)     max: 3444 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
017535052570087510501225140015751750192521002275245026252800297531503325Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 258     avg: 304.4     median: 308 (85%)     max: 322 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
31.3 Points (41%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (90%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11500 points (69%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
65269 points (47%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
96508 Points (62%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17883 Points (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
319.3 s (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7777 points (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 42155     avg: 58837     median: 59833 (34%)     max: 70397 MIPS
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4589     avg: 5894     median: 5988 (71%)     max: 6385 MIPS
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
154.7 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
354.5 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.7     avg: 21.2     median: 21.5 (38%)     max: 26.5 fps
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.3 GB/s (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 254     avg: 333.7     median: 327 (4%)     max: 492 Seconds
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 156     avg: 201.6     median: 198 (1%)     max: 293 Seconds
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4233     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.515 sec
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14666     avg: 14844     median: 14843.5 (32%)     max: 15021 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 79410     avg: 80381     median: 80381 (62%)     max: 81352 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17409     avg: 21532     median: 21045 (52%)     max: 24715 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 106965     avg: 111352     median: 111352 (90%)     max: 115738 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 106511     avg: 111384     median: 111384 (90%)     max: 116256 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 108898     avg: 112983     median: 112983 (91%)     max: 117068 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13466     avg: 19590     median: 19835.5 (50%)     max: 23195 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 22456     avg: 30961     median: 30073 (54%)     max: 37837 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6177     avg: 11512     median: 11660 (49%)     max: 13757 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2712     avg: 2855     median: 2867 (66%)     max: 2939 points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 11979     avg: 15392     median: 15456 (60%)     max: 17489 points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1938     avg: 2051     median: 2051 (69%)     max: 2121 points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11348     avg: 14803     median: 14574 (26%)     max: 17218 points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2094 points (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13465 points (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8697 points (87%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
50379 points (49%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 427     avg: 455.1     median: 454 (1%)     max: 510 ms
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 108636     avg: 115075     median: 114540 (76%)     max: 122048 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 247     avg: 293.1     median: 298 (78%)     max: 317 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 273     avg: 311.6     median: 315 (57%)     max: 331 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1610     avg: 1904     median: 1945 (71%)     max: 2058 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.3     avg: 83.4     median: 81.4 (14%)     max: 142.9 Watt
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59.7     avg: 97.3     median: 74.7 (14%)     max: 168 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.5     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (5%)     max: 15.4 Watt
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.6     avg: 17.5     median: 9.3 (7%)     max: 137.5 Watt
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.5     avg: 32.7     median: 32.4 (24%)     max: 43.2 Points per Watt
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Amazon Logo
  • $1,199.99
    Lenovo ThinkBook 16 Gen 8 Business AI PC Laptop Computer, 16" FHD+, Intel 16-Core Ultra 7 255H (Beat i7-13900H), 32GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB PCIe SSD, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, Fingerprint Reader, Windows 11 Pro
  • $1,299.99
    Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 3 Business AI PC Laptop (16" FHD+ Anti-Glare, Intel 16-Core Ultra 7 255H (> i9-13900H), 32GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB SSD) Thunderbolt 4, 5MP Webcam, Fingerprint Reader, Win 11 Pro
  • $1,369.00
    Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 3 16" FHD+ Business Laptop Computer, Intel 16-Core Ultra 7 255H (Beat i9-13900H), Arc 140T, 32GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB PCIe SSD, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, Webcam, Windows 11 Pro
  • $849.97
    ASUS Zenbook 14" FHD+ Touch Screen Laptop|Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (Series 2)|Next-Level Intel Arc GPU| Copilot| Backlit | 16GB RAM DDR5 | 512GB SSD |Windows 11 Home |Bundle with Stylus Pen
  • $1,495.00
    HP OMEN 16 Slim 16" IPS Micro-Edge Display, Gaming Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 7 255H 1.5GHz Processor; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 8GB GDDR7; 32GB DDR5-5600 RAM; 1TB NVMe SSD

v1.35
log 27. 14:16:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:24:18 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.011s ... 0.012s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.013s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18903 +0.017s ... 0.03s

#11 got single benchmarks 18903 +0.051s ... 0.081s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.081s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +1.252s ... 1.334s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.742s ... 2.076s

#15 return log +0s ... 2.076s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H processor

XMG Evo 15 (M25) 笔记本电脑评测--MacBook Air 15 的最佳 Windows 替代品？

XMG Evo 15 (M25) 笔记本电脑评测--MacBook Air 15 的最佳 Windows 替代品？

XMG Evo 15 是一款轻薄的 15 英寸笔记本电脑，配备英特尔 Arrow Lake 处理器、明亮的雾面 IPS 显示屏和坚实的整体功能。它是一款性能出众的全能型笔记本电脑，没有什么大的缺点，有英特尔或 AMD 处理器可供选择。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 15.30" | 1.8 kg
配备 Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 的移动工作站--联想 ThinkPad P16v Gen 3 评测

配备 Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 的移动工作站--联想 ThinkPad P16v Gen 3 评测

ThinkPad P16v Gen 3 是联想推出的一款移动工作站。在某些方面，如外壳材料或图形和散热性能方面，联想节省了成本。尽管如此，它的价格仍超过 2800 欧元（约合人民币 3248 元）。在我们的测试中，我们会发现这是否合理。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | 16.00" | 2.2 kg
联想 ThinkPad P1 16 代 8 评测：Tandem OLED 系列首发

联想 ThinkPad P1 16 代 8 评测：Tandem OLED 系列首发

ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 的外观可能与上一代机型相同，但新的串联式 OLED 显示屏选项可以极大地改善 HDR 观赏体验，适合那些重视 HDR 的用户。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
戴尔 16 Premium 笔记本电脑评测：比 XPS 16 更快、更高效

戴尔 16 Premium 笔记本电脑评测：比 XPS 16 更快、更高效

不要再用 "XPS 已死 "这样的标题了--戴尔 16 Premium 是该系列的延续，拥有类似的硬件，但采用了更新的英特尔和 Nvidia 选项，性能比以前更快。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.30" | 2.3 kg
寄希望于英特尔 ARC 的 Firefly 继任者：HP ZBook 8 G1i 14 笔记本电脑评测

寄希望于英特尔 ARC 的 Firefly 继任者：HP ZBook 8 G1i 14 笔记本电脑评测

随着 2025 代的到来，惠普退出了 ZBook Firefly 品牌，转而将惠普 ZBook 8 G1i 14 作为其经济实惠的工作站笔记本电脑销售。最新版本使用英特尔 Arrow Lake H，我们的特定型号没有 Nvidia GPU--只使用英特尔显卡的实验能成功吗？...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.7 kg

Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 英特尔子笔记本重振雄风 - 华硕 ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA 评测

Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 14: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 14 笔记本电脑评测：强大的可维护性，但重量不轻

Dell 14 Premium: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  Review » 戴尔 14 Premium 笔记本电脑评测：名副其实的 XPS 14

Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.60", 1 kg
  Review » 1 千克超极本，配备 Arrow Lake 和出色的输入设备 -Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025 评测

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G7-21SYS00H00: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 联想ThinkPad E14 G7评测--凭借120赫兹显示屏，这款经济实惠的办公笔记本电脑在竞争中脱颖而出

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 这款经济实惠的联想笔记本电脑比大多数 ThinkPads 更易于升级：ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL评测

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16IAH G10 灵光版评测：出色的多媒体笔记本电脑，1,100 尼特 OLED 给人留下深刻印象

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 可折叠笔记本评测：屏幕加倍而重量不变

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 小米红米笔记本 Pro 14 2025 评测--现在采用 Arrow Lake 技术，电池续航时间长达 16 小时

Dell Pro Max 16 MC16250: Nvidia RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Dell Pro Max 16 MC16250

Dell 16 Premium, RTX 5060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium, RTX 5060

Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3: Nvidia RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3

HP Omen 16-am0000: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-am0000

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8: NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8

Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 14.50", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71

Asus Expertbook B5405: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Expertbook B5405

Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.60", 1 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025

Dell 14 Premium: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Premium

Acer Aspire Vero 16 AV16-71P: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Vero 16 AV16-71P

Asus Vivobook S16 S3607CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S16 S3607CA

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10

Dell 16 Premium DA16250: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium DA16250

Dell 14 Premium DA14250: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Premium DA14250

LG gram Pro 16Z90TP: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 16Z90TP

Asus Vivobook S14 S3407CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 S3407CA

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10

Asus VivoBook S16 OLED S5606CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S16 OLED S5606CA

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90TP: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90TP

Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE: NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, 16.00", 2.2 kg
   » 联想移动工作站 ThinkPad P16v Gen 3 在错误的地方降低成本

   » 为什么像 ThinkPad P16v Gen 3 这样的移动工作站没有配备最快的组件？

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8: NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 配备串联 OLED 显示屏的联想 ThinkPad P1 8 代亮度高达近 1500 尼特，令人难以置信

   » 联想 ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 弃用交流适配器端口，改用更小的 USB-C 充电端口

Dell 16 Premium DA16250: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.30", 2.3 kg
   » 小型 130 W USB-C 适配器为配备酷睿 Ultra H 和 RTX 5070 图形处理器的戴尔 16 Premium 提供动力

   » 戴尔 16 Premium CPU 的运行速度比 XPS 16 9640 快 15% 到 20%，但也有一个问题

   » 戴尔 16 Premium 60 WGeForce RTX 5070 既令人惊叹又令人失望

HP ZBook 8 G1i 14: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » 旧标准的回归：惠普让 RJ45 以太网端口重返多种商业模式

Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » 英特尔 ZenBook 14 OLED 配备 Wi-Fi 7，但 AMD 版本的传输速度更快

   » 今年的 ZenBook 14 采用英特尔还是 AMD 更好？

Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 14: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 标配了其他大多数 14 英寸笔记本电脑所没有的功能

Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.60", 1 kg
   » Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025 的广告宣传峰值亮度高达 1600 尼特，但我们测得的亮度仅为 740 尼特

Dell 14 Premium: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.50", 1.7 kg
   » XPS 14 通过戴尔 14 Premium 延续了下来，变化不大

   » 戴尔 14 Premium 的价格与更轻、更强大的 Razer Blade 14 不相上下

Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.60", 1 kg
   » Honor新款 MagicBook Art 14 2025 的键盘比现代 ThinkPad 更好用

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G7-21SYS00H00: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 联想ThinkPad E14和ThinkBook 14--商务与消费对比

   » 联想终于为经济实惠的 ThinkPad E14 提供了更好的 120 Hz 显示屏

   » 14 英寸办公笔记本电脑，提供出色的维护选项：ThinkPad E14 G7 提供 2 个固态硬盘和 2 个内存插槽

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 这款联想 ThinkBook 笔记本电脑实现了升级梦想，而且价格实惠

Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00E00: Intel Arc Graphics 140T
   » ThinkPad E16 G3 中的 Core Ultra 7 255H 值得购买吗？我们测试了它

Khadas Mind 2s: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 0.4 kg
   » 模块化 Khadas Mind 2s 迷你电脑评测：可装入口袋的便携式台式机替代品

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 联想 Yoga Book 9 14 箭湖处理器的节流比我们希望的要严重一些

   » 最新的联想 Yoga Book 9 14 重量甚至低于较小的 13 英寸版本，但显示屏更大

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Arrow Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
   20x 3.3 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
   20x 3.3 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX
   24x 2.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285
   24x 1.9 GHz - 5.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245
   14x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235
   14x 3.4 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
   14x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
   14x 4.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235U
   12x 2.4 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
   12x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225U
   12x 2.4 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
   12x 3.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
   8x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-13705H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core i5-14500HX
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13700HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 5 GHz
- Apple M4 (9 cores)
   9x 2.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-01- 8)