Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Intel Ultra 7 255H

英特尔酷睿至尊 7 255H是基于箭湖架构的移动高端 CPU，适用于大型笔记本电脑。它提供 16 个内核，包括 6 个主频高达 5.1 GHz 的快速性能内核（Lion Cove）和 8 个主频高达 4.4 GHz 的小型高效内核（Skymont），以及另外两个主频高达 2.5 GHz 的 "低功耗 "高效内核（Skymont）。CPU 可访问 24 MB 高速缓存，TDP 为 28 瓦（PL1，115 瓦 PL2）。

SoC 集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU，具有 13 个 TOPS (Int8)，可选择支持 vPro Essentials。集成内存控制器支持高达 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 或 DDR5-6400（双通道）。集成图形处理器（iGPU）是一块 英特尔 Arc 140T 图形卡它提供八个 Xe 内核，主频高达 2.25 GHz。

性能 - 高端

酷睿至尊 7 优于顶级型号 酷睿至尊 9 285H仅在最大 Turbo 频率上降低了 200 MHz。由于内核（尤其是高效内核）的 IPC 有所改进，CPU 的性能应略低于旧版的 猛禽湖酷睿 9 270H(6 + 8 核心，最高 5.8 / 4.1 GHz）的水平。这使得该 CPU 非常适合高端游戏和内容创建等要求苛刻的任务。

芯片组设计

与台式机芯片和 HX 芯片一样，Arrow Lake-H 芯片也是基于单个芯片，这些芯片采用 Foveros 3D 封装，置于英特尔提供的 22 纳米基片上。CPU 部分来自台积电，采用现代 N3B（3 纳米）工艺。与 HX 一样，GPU 也在台积电生产，采用 N5P 工艺制造。SoC 和 I/O Tile 也来自台积电，但采用的是较早的 N6 工艺。

CodenameArrow Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow Lake

Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H « 4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Clock Rate4400 - 5100 MHz
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Manufacturing Technology5 nm
Max. Temperature110 °C
GPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2250 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Starting Price$514 U.S.
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
42 pt (70%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
40.8 -3%
Intel Core i7-13700HX
40.9 -3%
Intel Core i9-12950HX
40.9 -3%
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.9 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
41 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
41 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
41 -2%
Intel Core i7-13800H
41.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
42
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.2 0%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
42.3 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
42.8 2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 3%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.1 5%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 5%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 7%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50.1 19%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 43%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 119     avg: 124.1     median: 125.1 (70%)     max: 128.1 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 750     avg: 924     median: 856 (16%)     max: 1197 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16105     avg: 18008     median: 17812 (17%)     max: 22578 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1946     avg: 2070     median: 2079 (87%)     max: 2152 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
1988 -4%
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
1992 -4%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2000 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2010 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2013 -3%
Intel Core i7-13800H
2017 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2040 -1%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 -1%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2070
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2111 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2128 3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2139 3%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2185 6%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2188 6%
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2202 6%
...
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 10%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2359 14%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 752     avg: 794     median: 801.5 (87%)     max: 826 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6356     avg: 7079     median: 6967 (17%)     max: 8860 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2414     avg: 2761     median: 2739.5 (17%)     max: 3444 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
017535052570087510501225140015751750192521002275245026252800297531503325Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 258     avg: 302.8     median: 308.5 (85%)     max: 322 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
31.3 Points (41%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (90%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11500 points (69%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
65269 points (47%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
96508 Points (62%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17883 Points (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
319.3 s (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7777 points (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 47514     avg: 57223     median: 56812 (33%)     max: 68627 MIPS
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4589     avg: 5894     median: 5963 (70%)     max: 6385 MIPS
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
154.7 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
354.5 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.2     avg: 20.5     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 25.8 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.3 GB/s (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 256     avg: 343.4     median: 332 (4%)     max: 429 Seconds
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 157     avg: 206.8     median: 204.5 (1%)     max: 251 Seconds
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4233     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.515 sec
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14666     avg: 14844     median: 14843.5 (32%)     max: 15021 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 79410     avg: 80381     median: 80381 (62%)     max: 81352 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 18204     avg: 20738     median: 20818 (51%)     max: 24715 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 106965     avg: 111352     median: 111352 (90%)     max: 115738 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 106511     avg: 111384     median: 111384 (90%)     max: 116256 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 108898     avg: 112983     median: 112983 (91%)     max: 117068 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 17606     avg: 19379     median: 19769 (50%)     max: 20091 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27509     avg: 30133     median: 28867 (51%)     max: 37837 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8609     avg: 11151     median: 11169 (47%)     max: 13757 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2712     avg: 2863     median: 2873 (72%)     max: 2925 points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11979     avg: 14855     median: 14719 (57%)     max: 17489 points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1938     avg: 2060     median: 2065 (81%)     max: 2121 points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11348     avg: 14261     median: 14092 (25%)     max: 17218 points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2094 points (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13465 points (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8697 points (87%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
50379 points (50%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 427     avg: 452.2     median: 445 (1%)     max: 510 ms
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 112005     avg: 117358     median: 117689 (86%)     max: 122048 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 269     avg: 298.1     median: 298 (82%)     max: 317 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 301     avg: 312.5     median: 312.5 (56%)     max: 327 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1610     avg: 1893     median: 1923 (72%)     max: 2058 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.3     avg: 68.1     median: 56.8 (10%)     max: 131.1 Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59.7     avg: 82.8     median: 67.1 (12%)     max: 168 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.84     avg: 7.5     median: 7.7 (5%)     max: 11.1 Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.89     avg: 8.6     median: 9.1 (10%)     max: 10.2 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.5     avg: 36.7     median: 39.9 (30%)     max: 43.2 Points per Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33
log 12. 10:00:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:50:58 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.012s ... 0.013s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.015s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18903 +0.018s ... 0.033s

#11 got single benchmarks 18903 +0.039s ... 0.072s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +1.14s ... 1.212s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.212s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.212s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H processor

Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 14 笔记本电脑评测：强大的可维护性，但重量不轻

Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 14 笔记本电脑评测：强大的可维护性，但重量不轻

Blitz Ultra 2 14 是极少数支持两个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘和两个可拆卸 DDR5 SODIMM 模块的 14 英寸笔记本电脑之一，内存总容量高达 128 GB。作为回报，它比其他同尺寸机型略重。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
戴尔 14 Premium 笔记本电脑评测：名副其实的 XPS 14

戴尔 14 Premium 笔记本电脑评测：名副其实的 XPS 14

备受推崇的 XPS 名称可能已不复存在，但它在新款戴尔 14 Premium 中仍熠熠生辉。最新机型配备了速度更快的 Arrow Lake-H 处理器，具有更好的 Turbo Boost 可持续性，以吸引高级用户。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.50" | 1.7 kg
1 千克超极本，配备 Arrow Lake 和出色的输入设备 -Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025 评测

1 千克超极本，配备 Arrow Lake 和出色的输入设备 -Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025 评测

Honor MagicBook Art 14 采用英特尔 Arrow Lake 处理器和新的 OLED 屏幕，亮度可达 1600 尼特。键盘也得到了改进，磁性网络摄像头依然非常实用。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.60" | 1 kg
联想ThinkPad E14 G7评测--凭借120赫兹显示屏，这款经济实惠的办公笔记本电脑在竞争中脱颖而出

联想ThinkPad E14 G7评测--凭借120赫兹显示屏，这款经济实惠的办公笔记本电脑在竞争中脱颖而出

联想更新了其经济实惠的 14 英寸办公笔记本电脑，配备了英特尔 Arrow Lake 处理器和刷新率为 120 Hz 的新型高分辨率 IPS 显示屏。它的电池续航时间也得到了改善，小巧的 ThinkPad 提供了很好的维护选择。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
这款经济实惠的联想笔记本电脑比大多数 ThinkPads 更易于升级：ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL评测

这款经济实惠的联想笔记本电脑比大多数 ThinkPads 更易于升级：ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL评测

ThinkBook 品牌一直处于知名度更高、更受欢迎的 ThinkPad 的阴影之下。虽然 ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL 不会扼杀人们对 ThinkPad 的需求，但它在某些方面做得比黑色的同类产品更好，比如可升级性。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.5 kg

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16IAH G10 灵光版评测：出色的多媒体笔记本电脑，1,100 尼特 OLED 给人留下深刻印象

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 可折叠笔记本评测：屏幕加倍而重量不变

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 小米红米笔记本 Pro 14 2025 评测--现在采用 Arrow Lake 技术，电池续航时间长达 16 小时

Acer Aspire Vero 16 AV16-71P: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Vero 16 AV16-71P

Asus Vivobook S16 S3607CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S16 S3607CA

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10

Dell 16 Premium DA16250: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.30", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium DA16250

Dell 14 Premium DA14250: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Premium DA14250

LG gram Pro 16Z90TP: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 16Z90TP

Asus Vivobook S14 S3407CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 S3407CA

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10

Asus VivoBook S16 OLED S5606CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S16 OLED S5606CA

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90TP: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90TP

Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 14: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 标配了其他大多数 14 英寸笔记本电脑所没有的功能

Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.60", 1 kg
   » Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025 的广告宣传峰值亮度高达 1600 尼特，但我们测得的亮度仅为 740 尼特

Dell 14 Premium: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.50", 1.7 kg
   » XPS 14 通过戴尔 14 Premium 延续了下来，变化不大

   » 戴尔 14 Premium 的价格与更轻、更强大的 Razer Blade 14 不相上下

Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.60", 1 kg
   » Honor新款 MagicBook Art 14 2025 的键盘比现代 ThinkPad 更好用

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G7-21SYS00H00: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 联想ThinkPad E14和ThinkBook 14--商务与消费对比

   » 联想终于为经济实惠的 ThinkPad E14 提供了更好的 120 Hz 显示屏

   » 14 英寸办公笔记本电脑，提供出色的维护选项：ThinkPad E14 G7 提供 2 个固态硬盘和 2 个内存插槽

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 这款联想 ThinkBook 笔记本电脑实现了升级梦想，而且价格实惠

Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00E00: Intel Arc Graphics 140T
   » ThinkPad E16 G3 中的 Core Ultra 7 255H 值得购买吗？我们测试了它

Khadas Mind 2s: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 0.4 kg
   » 模块化 Khadas Mind 2s 迷你电脑评测：可装入口袋的便携式台式机替代品

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 联想 Yoga Book 9 14 箭湖处理器的节流比我们希望的要严重一些

   » 最新的联想 Yoga Book 9 14 重量甚至低于较小的 13 英寸版本，但显示屏更大

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Arrow Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235
   14x 3.4 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
   14x 4.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i7-13700HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core 9 270H
   14x 2 GHz - 5.8 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-13900HK
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
   16x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13905H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Apple M3 Max 14-Core
   14x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-10)