Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Intel Ultra 7 255H

英特尔酷睿至尊 7 255H是基于箭湖架构的移动高端 CPU，适用于大型笔记本电脑。它提供 16 个内核，包括 6 个主频高达 5.1 GHz 的快速性能内核（Lion Cove）和 8 个主频高达 4.4 GHz 的小型高效内核（Skymont），以及另外两个主频高达 2.5 GHz 的 "低功耗 "高效内核（Skymont）。CPU 可访问 24 MB 高速缓存，TDP 为 28 瓦（PL1，115 瓦 PL2）。

SoC 集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU，具有 13 个 TOPS (Int8)，可选择支持 vPro Essentials。集成内存控制器支持高达 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 或 DDR5-6400（双通道）。集成图形处理器（iGPU）是一块 英特尔 Arc 140T 图形卡它提供八个 Xe 内核，主频高达 2.25 GHz。

性能 - 高端

酷睿至尊 7 优于顶级型号 酷睿至尊 9 285H仅在最大 Turbo 频率上降低了 200 MHz。由于内核（尤其是高效内核）的 IPC 有所改进，CPU 的性能应略低于旧版的 猛禽湖酷睿 9 270H(6 + 8 核心，最高 5.8 / 4.1 GHz）的水平。这使得该 CPU 非常适合高端游戏和内容创建等要求苛刻的任务。

芯片组设计

与台式机芯片和 HX 芯片一样，Arrow Lake-H 芯片也是基于单个芯片，这些芯片采用 Foveros 3D 封装，置于英特尔提供的 22 纳米基片上。CPU 部分来自台积电，采用现代 N3B（3 纳米）工艺。与 HX 一样，GPU 也在台积电生产，采用 N5P 工艺制造。SoC 和 I/O Tile 也来自台积电，但采用的是较早的 N6 工艺。

CodenameArrow Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow Lake

Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H « 4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Clock Rate4400 - 5100 MHz
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Manufacturing Technology5 nm
Max. Temperature110 °C
GPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2250 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Starting Price$514 U.S.
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
42.4 pt (71%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
Intel Core i9-12950HX
40.9 -4%
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.9 -4%
AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
41 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
41.1 -3%
Intel Core i7-13800H
41.5 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 -1%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.2 0%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
42.3 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
42.4
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
43.1 2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.1 4%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 4%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44.9 6%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.1 6%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 7%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50 18%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 42%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.5     avg: 126.2     median: 126.5 (71%)     max: 128.1 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 750     avg: 942     median: 856 (16%)     max: 1197 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16435     avg: 18134     median: 17652.5 (16%)     max: 22578 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2047     avg: 2095     median: 2098.5 (88%)     max: 2152 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2000 -5%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2010 -4%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2013 -4%
Intel Core i7-13800H
2017 -4%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2034 -3%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 -2%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -1%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2090 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2095
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2139 2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2145 2%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2185 4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2192 5%
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2202 5%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2209 5%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2213 6%
...
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 8%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2359 13%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 786     avg: 805     median: 807 (88%)     max: 826 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6414     avg: 7150     median: 7015 (17%)     max: 8860 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2414     avg: 2829     median: 2835 (18%)     max: 3444 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
017535052570087510501225140015751750192521002275245026252800297531503325Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 258     avg: 306.9     median: 312 (86%)     max: 322 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
299.8 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
301 -2%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
301.5 -2%
Apple M4 (10 cores)
302 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
303 -1%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
303.6 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
304.3 -1%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
305.2 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
306 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
306.9
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
307 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
314 2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
317 3%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
324 6%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
324.5 6%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
327 7%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
331.6 8%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
332.5 8%
...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
324 6%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
357.8 17%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
31.3 Points (41%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (90%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11500 points (69%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
65269 points (47%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
96508 Points (62%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17883 Points (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
319.3 s (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7777 points (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 47514     avg: 57327     median: 56801 (33%)     max: 68627 MIPS
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4589     avg: 5906     median: 6015.5 (71%)     max: 6385 MIPS
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
154.7 fps (52%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
354.5 fps (82%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.2     avg: 20.5     median: 20.5 (36%)     max: 25.8 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.3 GB/s (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 256     avg: 340     median: 341 (4%)     max: 429 Seconds
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 157     avg: 207.7     median: 211 (1%)     max: 251 Seconds
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4233     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.515 sec
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14666     avg: 14844     median: 14843.5 (32%)     max: 15021 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 79410     avg: 80381     median: 80381 (62%)     max: 81352 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 18204     avg: 21223     median: 20949 (52%)     max: 24715 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 106965     avg: 111352     median: 111352 (90%)     max: 115738 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 106511     avg: 111384     median: 111384 (90%)     max: 116256 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 108898     avg: 112983     median: 112983 (94%)     max: 117068 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19528     avg: 19733     median: 19769 (50%)     max: 19902 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27621     avg: 30658     median: 29128 (52%)     max: 37837 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9186     avg: 11565     median: 11334.5 (48%)     max: 13757 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2892     median: 2894 (72%)     max: 2925 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11979     avg: 14969     median: 15223 (59%)     max: 17489 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 points (99%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 points (86%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1980     avg: 2081     median: 2103 (82%)     max: 2121 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11348     avg: 14420     median: 14322 (26%)     max: 17218 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2094 points (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13465 points (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8697 points (87%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
50379 points (50%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 427     avg: 441.3     median: 443 (1%)     max: 455 ms
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 116699     avg: 119142     median: 118679 (90%)     max: 122048 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 291     avg: 303.9     median: 303.5 (83%)     max: 317 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 315.1     median: 315 (57%)     max: 327 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1665     avg: 1905     median: 1920 (72%)     max: 2058 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56.1     avg: 76.8     median: 58.4 (10%)     max: 131.1 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.3     avg: 101     median: 85.8 (16%)     max: 168 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.84     avg: 8.1     median: 8.9 (6%)     max: 11.1 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.39     avg: 8.7     median: 8.9 (10%)     max: 9.56 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789101112Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.5     avg: 33.3     median: 36 (27%)     max: 40.6 Points per Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33
log 29. 20:02:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:37:44 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.001s ... 0.022s

#8 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.024s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18903 +0.029s ... 0.053s

#11 got single benchmarks 18903 +0.032s ... 0.086s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +4.217s ... 4.302s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 4.303s

#15 return log +0s ... 4.303s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H processor

这款经济实惠的联想笔记本电脑比大多数 ThinkPads 更易于升级：ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL评测

这款经济实惠的联想笔记本电脑比大多数 ThinkPads 更易于升级：ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL评测

ThinkBook 品牌一直处于知名度更高、更受欢迎的 ThinkPad 的阴影之下。虽然 ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL 不会扼杀人们对 ThinkPad 的需求，但它在某些方面做得比黑色的同类产品更好，比如可升级性。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
联想 Yoga Pro 9i G10 灵光版评测

联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16IAH G10 灵光版评测：出色的多媒体笔记本电脑，1,100 尼特 OLED 给人留下深刻印象

联想 Yoga Pro 9i Aura Edition 是一款高品质的多媒体笔记本电脑，即使是基本版本，其良好的性能和市场上最好的 OLED 屏幕也给人留下了深刻印象。舒适的输入设备和出色的音响系统让体验更加完美。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
联想 Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 可折叠笔记本评测：屏幕加倍而重量不变

联想 Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 可折叠笔记本评测：屏幕加倍而重量不变

引人注目的 Yoga Book 9 今年以更大的 14 英寸外形回归，屏幕面积比以前更大。如果你喜欢上一代产品，你一定会爱上这款新机型，但许多核心缺点依然存在。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
2025 RedmiBook Pro 14

小米红米笔记本 Pro 14 2025 评测--现在采用 Arrow Lake 技术，电池续航时间长达 16 小时

2025 RedmiBook Pro 14 配备了英特尔 Arrow Lake 处理器、更明亮的 120 Hz IPS 显示屏和更长的电池续航时间。尽管价格有所上涨，但它仍然是一款强劲的中端产品。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.4 kg

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10

Asus VivoBook S16 OLED S5606CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S16 OLED S5606CA

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90TP: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90TP

Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00E00: Intel Arc Graphics 140T
   » ThinkPad E16 G3 中的 Core Ultra 7 255H 值得购买吗？我们测试了它

Khadas Mind 2s: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 0.4 kg
   » 模块化 Khadas Mind 2s 迷你电脑评测：可装入口袋的便携式台式机替代品

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 联想 Yoga Book 9 14 箭湖处理器的节流比我们希望的要严重一些

   » 最新的联想 Yoga Book 9 14 重量甚至低于较小的 13 英寸版本，但显示屏更大

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Arrow Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
   14x 3.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235
   14x 3.4 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
   20x 2.3 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
   10x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
   14x 4.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i7-13700HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core 9 270H
   14x 2 GHz - 5.8 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-13900HK
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
   16x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13905H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Apple M3 Max 14-Core
   14x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-10)