评语：体积大，功能强大，边角经过精心切割
Crosshair 18 HX 的显著特点是价格低于大多数其他 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，甚至低于许多 16 英寸机型。为了实现这一目标，它摒弃了发烧级的小玩意儿，如蒸汽腔冷却、花哨的 4K 或迷你 LED 选项、金属合金材料或GeForce RTX 5080 或 5090 性能，从而降低了起售价。那些只想要宽敞屏幕而不想要高昂价格的游戏玩家和编辑可能会发现 Crosshair 18 HX 很有吸引力，尤其是因为它仍然搭载与价格更高的替代产品相同的酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX CPU。
可以说，该机型最大的缺点是原生 QHD+ 分辨率和过于塑料的结构。对于 18 英寸的屏幕来说，PPI 相对较低，而容易留下指纹的键盘面板和底座给人的感觉并不奢华。但它仍不失为一款配备高质量 P3 显示屏的 1080p 或 1440p 游戏机，主流游戏玩家和学生同样可以欣赏它。
Pros
+ 在同类尺寸产品中价格相对较低
+ 支持 PCIe5 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘
+ 与同尺寸产品相比电池续航时间长
+ 标配全彩 P3
+ 快速的 Arrow Lake-HX CPU
Cons
- 仅限GeForce RTX 5070 显卡
- 无 G-Sync 或 4K 选项
- 大部分为塑料机箱
- HDR 支持薄弱
- 拥挤的数字键盘
价格和供应情况
本次评测中配置的微星Crosshair 18 HX是，目前在Costco.com上的售价为1700美元。售价为 1700 美元。亚马逊 上的 Crosshair A18 HX AMD 版售价超过 3000 美元。
$1,781.95
msi Crosshair 18 HX AI 18" 2560x1600 240Hz Display Gaming Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24 Cores, 2.1-5.4 GHz), NVIDIA RTX 5070 8GB GDDR7, 32GB RAM, 1TB NVMe SSD, Windows 11 Home
Crosshair 18 HX 是微星推出的一款 18 英寸大型中端游戏笔记本电脑，与价格更高的 Vector 18 和 Stealth 18 形成鲜明对比、 突击者18或 泰坦 18系列。它的最高配置为 115 WGeForce RTX 5070 GPU 和 QHD+ 显示屏，以节省成本，而大多数其他 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑都可以配置速度更快的 RTX 5090 或 4K UHD 选项。
我们这次评测的是高端配置，配备酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX、115 瓦 RTX 5070 GPU 和 QHD+ 240 Hz 显示屏，售价约为 1700 美元。配置较低的笔记本可能会配备 Core Ultra 7 255HX CPU 和 RTX 5060。
其他选择包括其他 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，如 宏碁掠夺者 Helios 18或 华硕 ROG Strix G18等其他 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，但这些选择往往价格更高。18 英寸 Crosshair 18 与搭载 AMD 处理器的 17 英寸 Crosshair A17包括键盘和端口。
更多微星评论：
规格
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 140 W PL2 / Short Burst, 96 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1425 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 115 W TDP, GDDR7, 576.8, MUX
Memory
32 GB
, Kingston, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 47-45-45-90, Removable
Display
18.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 168 PPI, BOE NE180QDM-NZ4, IPS, Controller: BOE0C64, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)
Storage
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, 1024 GB
Weight
3.116 kg, Power Supply: 729 g
Price
1700 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
与 Crosshair A17 相似，机箱主要采用塑料材质，以节省成本。我们的 18 英寸机型比 A17 重约 200 克，但厚度相同。
连接性
交流
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø950 (517-1033)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1299 (1003-1452)
网络摄像头
为了节省成本，该摄像头的分辨率仅为 720p，不支持红外功能。标配物理快门。
3.8 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
维护
输入设备
键盘与 Crosshair A17相同的键入体验。同时，点击板稍大，约为 13 x 8.2 厘米。
显示屏
微星搭载了与华硕 ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 相似的京东方 NE180QDM IPS 面板。 华硕 ROG Strix G18 2025 G814可实现 P3 全彩，两者的观看体验相似。需要注意的是，虽然这款显示器的响应速度很快，亮度也达到了约 500 尼特，但却不支持 G-Sync。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NE180QDM-NZ4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 581.4 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 533.8 cd/m² Minimum: 32.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 581.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1264:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.89 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
calibrated: 0.97
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
86.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
CCT: 6835 K
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW BOE NE180QDM-NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 NE180QDM-NZC, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Alienware m18 R1 AMD BOE NE18NZ1, IPS, 1920x1200, 18", 480 Hz | Acer Predator Helios 18 AI B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 250 Hz | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 0% | 1% | 2% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 98 | 99.4 1% | 98.1 0% | 98.5 1% | 99.7 2% | 97.1 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 86.1 | 87.7 2% | 86.3 0% | 88.7 3% | 90.1 5% | 84.9 -1% |
| Response Times | 32% | 15% | 24% | 47% | -69% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 4.7 ? | 3.8 ? 19% | 4.3 ? 9% | 2.8 ? 40% | 3.6 ? 23% | 13.3 ? -183% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 10.3 ? | 5.8 ? 44% | 8.1 ? 21% | 9.6 ? 7% | 3.1 ? 70% | 5.7 ? 45% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 2500 | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 100 | |||||
| Screen | 29% | 5% | 26% | 158% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 581.4 | 582 0% | 543 -7% | 319.6 -45% | 730 26% | 471 -19% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 534 | 557 4% | 502 -6% | 304 -43% | 719 35% | 468 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 84 | 93 11% | 86 2% | 87 4% | 96 14% | 96 14% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.46 | 0.4 13% | 0.56 -22% | 0.25 46% | 0.04 91% | 0.4 13% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1264 | 1455 15% | 970 -23% | 1278 1% | 18250 1344% | 1178 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.89 | 1.4 64% | 3.41 12% | 1.22 69% | 3.34 14% | 2.72 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.94 | 3.4 57% | 6.4 19% | 3.1 61% | 6.56 17% | 5.49 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.97 | 0.7 28% | 0.66 32% | 0.47 52% | 2.44 -152% | 1.12 -15% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 1.8 68% | 3.4 39% | 0.8 86% | 3.86 31% | 3.2 43% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.24 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.62 84% | 2.227 99% |
| CCT | 6835 95% | 6633 98% | 6070 107% | 6471 100% | 6859 95% | 6925 94% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 21% /
23% | 7% /
5% | 17% /
20% | 69% /
109% | -20% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8205 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 MSI Center 设置为性能模式。
处理器
酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 酷睿至尊 9 275HX是英特尔箭湖-HX 平台上速度最快的处理器之一。它通常用于其他高性能 16 英寸或 18 英寸笔记本电脑，包括 Alienware 18 Area-51.原始性能与 Ryzen 9 8940HXCrosshair A17 中的 Ryzen 9 8940HX。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5222 (5148.67-5245.9)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX: Ø5642 (5588.93-5904.93)
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX: Ø6020 (5962.14-6091.99)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5466 (5377.07-5540.93)
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5233 (5169.96-5378.51)
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4163 (3956.09-4227.88)
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX: Ø5221 (5186.05-5406.14)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=26) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2843 - 3160, n=26) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30.7 - 43.8, n=24) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (28067 - 39895, n=24) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (140254 - 200744, n=24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6766 - 9817, n=24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (113887 - 140937, n=24) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (11172 - 14425, n=24) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72596 - 104508, n=24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (107195 - 247074, n=24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1599 - 2263, n=24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14847 - 21854, n=24) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (37482 - 62916, n=24) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力时，CPU 会提升至 3.7 GHz 和 130 W，然后下降，并在大约 70 秒后稳定在 3.5 GHz、92 C 和 97 W。因此，尽管核心温度很高，但高 Turbo Boost 持续性很好。
在 Cooler Boost 模式、Performance 模式和 Balanced 模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，GPU 板的平均功耗分别约为 105 W、110 W 和 64 W。如下表和截图所示，不同模式下 GPU 的时钟频率和温度各不相同。
| 平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 49 | 38 |
| Prime95 压力 | 3.5 | -- | 92 | 53 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 3.0 | 1635 | 90 | 79 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力（平衡模式） | 1.2 | 2115 | 71 | 70 |
| 赛博朋克2077压力（性能模式） | 1.4 | 2617 | 79 | 86 |
| 赛博朋克2077压力（冷却提升模式） | 1.5 | 2625 | 76 | 80 |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8018 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (56003 - 94460, n=24) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (55795 - 97151, n=24) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (55663 - 106063, n=24) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 161.6, n=24) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6843 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5855 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
529.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
574.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1126 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3016 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
78.57 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
173.2 MB/s
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6762 (5259.83-6887.53)
图形处理器性能
从下面的Fire Strike 结果表中可以看出，在 "Cooler Boost "模式（即 "涡轮增压 "模式）下运行并不一定会比 "Performance "模式提高性能。另一方面，降至平衡模式会导致约 10% 的性能损失。
配置 RTX 5060而不是我们的 RTX 5070预计会影响图形性能约 20%。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 冷却器提升模式 | 36908 | 41856 | 10151 |
| 性能模式 | 36095 (-2%) | 42319 (+1%) | 10317 (+2%) |
| 平衡模式 | 32198 (-13%) | 37821 (-10%) | 10807 (-7%) |
| 电池电量 | 23250 (-37%) | 27045 (-35%) | 6514 (-36%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 37868 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 68025 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 31470 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 13953 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
移动 RTX 5070 对于 1080p 游戏来说是一款可靠的 GPU，但如果玩要求更高的游戏，它在原生 QHD+ 分辨率下就会开始吃力。以《黑色神话：悟空传》为例，即使启用了 DLSS，在 QHD+ 最高设置下也只有不到 40 FPS，这意味着要达到 60 FPS 以上，建议使用中或中高设置。微星没有提供移动 RTX 5070 Ti 选项，这令人感到遗憾，因为 Ti 版本比 RTX 5070 快近 50%。
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W -1! | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG -1! | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | F1 24 | Black Myth: Wukong | Monster Hunter Wilds | Strange Brigade
| Monster Hunter Wilds | |
| 1920x1080 medium, no upscaling | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (75.9 - 78.2, n=2) | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| 1920x1080 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (39.1 - 43.2, n=2) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| 2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (21.1 - 24.3, n=2) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| 2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, DLSS3 quality | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø96.3 (91-97.6)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 185.4 | 180.4 | 176.7 | 142.1 | 126.2 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 220 | 189.7 | 181.8 | 165.8 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 234 | 193.7 | 145.3 | 104.5 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 128.6 | 114.7 | 99.8 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 510 | 339 | 280 | 244 | 168.6 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 178.7 | 152 | 132.8 | 128.8 | 127.4 | 90.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 168.2 | 141.7 | 114.7 | 101.9 | 74.3 | 63.4 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 288 | 275 | 223 | 87.1 | 86.7 | 54.8 |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 106 | 79 | 62 | 36 | 39 | 26 |
| Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 86.5 | 75.9 | 43.2 | 30.4 | 24.3 |
排放量
系统噪音
在平衡模式、性能模式和 Cooler Boost 模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，风扇噪音平均值分别为 47.7 dB(A)、54.4 dB(A) 和 58.6 dB(A)。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 27.3 / 27.3 / 27.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 30.1 / 58.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) | ||
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, R9 9955HX | Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Acer Predator Helios 18 AI GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X186N | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | -7% | 2% | -1% | -4% | -24% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.1 | 24.6 -6% | 22.5 3% | 22.4 3% | 24 -4% | 23.4 -1% | 24 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 27.3 | 24.6 10% | 26 5% | 23 16% | 24 12% | 23.9 12% | 25 8% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 27.3 | 30 -10% | 26 5% | 23.4 14% | 24 12% | 28.2 -3% | 30 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 27.6 | 30 -9% | 32 -16% | 33.5 -21% | 31.31 -13% | 29 -5% | 47 -70% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 30.1 | 34.4 -14% | 44.4 -48% | 33.5 -11% | 40.31 -34% | 36.8 -22% | 57 -89% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 54.4 | 49.7 9% | 49.8 8% | 50.33 7% | 57 -5% | ||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 58.6 | 49.7 15% | 61.6 -5% | 53.6 9% | 50.33 14% | 61.1 -4% | 58 1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 53.6 | 54.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于外形尺寸大、通风良好，键盘或掌托的表面温度不会让人感到不适。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.3 °C / 0.5 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.3 °C / 0.5 F).
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7900M | Acer Predator Helios 18 AI Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -12% | -6% | -26% | -20% | -32% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40.2 | 42.8 -6% | 46.6 -16% | 40.2 -0% | 48 -19% | 43.2 -7% | 51 -27% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 44 | 43.1 2% | 45.6 -4% | 37.4 15% | 59 -34% | 42.6 3% | 49 -11% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 25.6 | 26.8 -5% | 31.2 -22% | 31.6 -23% | 33 -29% | 36 -41% | 40 -56% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 26.8 | 26.6 1% | 28.6 -7% | 30.6 -14% | 33 -23% | 36.4 -36% | 36 -34% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
运行游戏时，240 瓦中型交流适配器的平均耗电量为 233 瓦。事实上，如下图所示，当 CPU 和 GPU 完全处于紧张状态时，耗电量会飙升至 323 W。这表明，笔记本电脑可以使用更大的 280 W 或更大的交流适配器，尤其是在同时充电和游戏的情况下。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.05 / 0.14 Watt |
| Idle | 8.8 / 14.1 / 35.4 Watt |
| Load |
106.2 / 322.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, , IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 18" | Acer Predator Helios 18 AI Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X186N, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, , Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18" | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -3% | -77% | -156% | -25% | -87% | -64% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 8.8 | 13.1 -49% | 20.8 -136% | 30.3 -244% | 17.3 -97% | 25.4 -189% | 32 -264% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 14.1 | 20.6 -46% | 52.8 -274% | 55.6 -294% | 23 -63% | 37.7 -167% | 36 -155% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 35.4 | 21.1 40% | 54.5 -54% | 101.1 -186% | 25.3 29% | 57.9 -64% | 47 -33% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 106.2 | 123.4 -16% | 146.6 -38% | 160.3 -51% | 123 -16% | 128.4 -21% | 132 -24% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 225 | 179.2 20% | 278 -24% | 243 -8% | 216 4% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 233 | 215 8% | 285 -22% | 244 -5% | 222 5% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 322.3 | 249.7 23% | 297.3 8% | 332.1 -3% | 375 -16% | 297.9 8% | 261 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 216 | 273.1 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø222 (211-322)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø211 (178.9-250)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø14.1 (7.18-19.3)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15.7 (8.96-28.2)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø233 (208-251)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø215 (212-218)
外部显示器功耗
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø186.4 (165.2-221)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø147.8 (145.1-193.7)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø195.2 (191.9-199.3)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø180.3 (154.2-185)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø160.8 (157.3-179)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø162.1 (157.8-189.7)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø13.2 (6.02-28.3)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø35.6 (30.4-39.6)
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø225 (206-245)
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø179.2 (169.4-185.3)
电池寿命
当设置为 iGPU 模式时，无线局域网的运行时间接近 11 小时，比许多其他游戏笔记本电脑都要长。
| MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 99 Wh | Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M, 97 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 18 AI Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -35% | -65% | -87% | -55% | -60% | -60% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 10.9 | 7.1 -35% | 3.8 -65% | 1.4 -87% | 4.9 -55% | 4.4 -60% | 4.4 -60% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 7 | 4.5 | 6.6 | ||||
| Load (h) | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1 | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 4.3 |
笔记本检查评级
Crosshair 18 HX 拥有大屏幕和极快的 CPU 性能，但它缩减了 GPU 和显示器分辨率，以提高经济性。
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
- 08/30/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.7%  | MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,781.95 msi Crosshair 18 HX AI 18" 2... 2. $114.00 Black Laptop 24-Zone RGB Bac... 3. $7.99 Keyboard Cover Skin Protecto... List Price: 1700 USD | 3.1 kg | 29.9 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
2. 86.4%  | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,799.99 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... 2. $1,899.99 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... 3. $2,214.99 ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2025) Ga... List Price: 2299€ | 2.9 kg | 30.8 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
3. 84.8%  | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $4,799.00 List Price: 3200 USD | 3.5 kg | 32.05 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
4. 89.2% v7 (old)  | Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX ⎘ AMD Radeon RX 7900M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $63.74 97Wh 9JRV0 Laptop Battery Re... 2. $60.56 JOTACT 9JRV0 Battery Replace... 3. $48.99 9JRV0 Battery 97Wh 6-Cell 11... List Price: 2300 USD | 3.9 kg | 26.7 mm | 18.00" 1920x1200 126 PPI IPS |
5. 86.4%  | Acer Predator Helios 18 AI Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 31.6 GB Memory, SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,299.99 Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 ... 2. $2,599.99 acer Predator Helios Neo 18"... 3. $56.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... List Price: 3999 Euro | 3.5 kg | 29.55 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
6. 90.5% v7 (old)  | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $4,399.99 List Price: 4500 USD | 3.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED |
7. 79.6%  | MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8WGKG AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.99 Rujcloud HDMI 2.1 Cable for ... 2. $39.99 SLRIOYS 240W 200W Charger Co... 3. $7.99 Keyboard Cover Skin Protecto... List Price: 2000 EUR | 2.9 kg | 29.7 mm | 17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
