结论 - Predator Triton 14 人工智能缺乏说服力
凭借 Predator Triton 14 AI,宏碁推出了一款紧凑型游戏机,其高品质的外壳和舒适的输入设备给人留下了深刻印象。高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器与快速的 GeForce RTX 5070的组合并不理想,因为处理器会在游戏时拖慢显卡的运行速度,多核性能也明显弱于竞争对手。此外,如果你真的想调用全部性能,散热会变得非常嘈杂。
OLED 触摸屏也不尽如人意。最大的问题是光栅效应清晰可见,严重影响了主观图像质量。此外,PWM 频率很低,色彩偏差也不利于图像处理。
在与 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14和 雷蛇刀锋Predator Triton 并不具备真正的竞争力。除了画质问题,宏碁的价格也明显更高,达到 2999 欧元(约合 3529 美元)。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
宏碁掠夺者 Triton 14 AI 可从在线零售商处购买,零售价为 2999 欧元(约合 3529 美元)。
通过 Predator Triton 14 AI,宏碁提供了一款配备 Lunar Lake 处理器、GeForce RTX 5070 笔记本电脑和 OLED 触摸屏的紧凑型游戏笔记本电脑。目前只有一款配备 32 GB 内存和 2 TB SSD 的机型在商店有售,零售价为 2999 欧元(约合人民币 3529 元)。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子和设备
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (20 - 210, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.5 - 261, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |

可持续性
宏碁没有提供任何有关二氧化碳足迹或使用回收材料的信息。包装可完全回收。
输入设备 - 舒适的 RGB 键盘
RGB 键盘提供了非常舒适的键入体验,即使是长篇文字也能轻松书写。与基本单元相比,键盘周围的外壳略微降低,因此可以实现相当宽裕的键程。相比之下,ROG Zephyrus G14 的键盘 ROG Zephyrus G14的键盘要更舒适一些,但也没什么好抱怨的。只有方向键太小,尤其是对于游戏玩家来说。
显示屏 - 有问题的 OLED
宏碁采用了三星生产的 120 Hz 的 14.5 英寸 OLED 触摸屏(2880 x 1800 像素,16:10)。OLED 的基本优势(色彩鲜艳、对比度高、响应速度快)是存在的,但触摸屏层会产生明显的光栅效应,这大大影响了主观图像质量,尤其是在明亮的内容下。我们试图在右图中捕捉这一现象,但摄像头将这一问题的恶化程度降到了最低。此外,在每个亮度级别下都会出现频率为 240 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁。亮度和色温都可以通过传感器控制。触摸屏非常容易反光,这限制了它的使用,尤其是在户外。
在 SDR 模式下,亮度略低于 380 cd/m²,黑阶为 0,因此对比度非常高。在 HDR 模式下,图像部分的最大亮度为 558 cd/m²,全屏幕为 478 cd/m²。该面板完全覆盖了 sRGB 和 P3 色彩空间,宏碁还提供了相应的色彩配置文件。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析,发现色温略微偏暖,但没有偏色现象。不过,色彩偏差部分超过了 3 的目标值,我们自己校准也无法改善。因此,该面板不是图像编辑的理想选择。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 376 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
95.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6138 K
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 ATNA45AF03-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5", 120 Hz | Razer Blade 14 2025 ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) BOE CQ NE145F8M-NY1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 165 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 BOE NE140QDM-NX7, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 165 Hz | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -2% | -23% | -24% | 0% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.6 | 99.5 0% | 99.6 0% | 65 -35% | 65.1 -35% | 99.6 0% | |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 95.3 -5% | 94 -6% | 100 0% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 95.1 | 89.2 -6% | 89.9 -5% | 66.8 -30% | 65.6 -31% | 96.1 1% | |
| Response Times | 6% | -19% | -917% | -1561% | -66% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.48 ? | 0.59 ? -23% | 0.62 ? -29% | 5.4 ? -1025% | 10.7 ? -2129% | 0.86 ? -79% | |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.65 ? | 0.63 ? 3% | 0.68 ? -5% | 5.9 ? -808% | 7.1 ? -992% | 0.99 ? -52% | |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 ? | 960 ? | 960 ? | 479 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 41 | 26 37% | 50 -22% | ||||
| Screen | 11% | 39% | -4% | -13% | -2% | ||
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 376 | 361 -4% | 423 13% | 450 20% | 455.8 21% | 386.3 3% | |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 377 | 363 -4% | 424 12% | 433 15% | 436 16% | 389 3% | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 99 | 98 -1% | 98 -1% | 87 -12% | 93 -6% | 98 -1% | |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | 0.45 | 0.38 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 1.7 37% | 0.7 74% | 2.26 16% | 3.39 -26% | 4.03 -49% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.3 | 3.9 26% | 1.8 66% | 7.5 -42% | 7.3 -38% | 6.69 -26% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 2.4 11% | 0.8 70% | 3.2 -19% | 3.9 -44% | 1.2 56% | |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.214 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.25 98% | |
| CCT | 6138 106% | 6571 99% | 6505 100% | 6121 106% | 7340 89% | 6280 104% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 42300 | 1000 | 1199 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 1.67 | 1.07 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
6% | 6% /
14% | -315% /
-175% | -533% /
-297% | -23% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.35 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.24 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 41 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8091 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
表演 - 月亮湖和布莱克韦尔
测试条件
| 能源概况 | TDP | CB24 Multi | TGP | Time Spy Graphics | CP2077 QHD Ultra | max.风扇容量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音 | 37 瓦 | 664 分 | 65 瓦 | 9,820 分 | 46.5 FPS | 40 分贝(A) |
| 平衡型 | 37 瓦 | 667 分 | 65 瓦 | 9,974 分 | 47.3 FPS | 47.6 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 37 瓦 | 668 分 | 85 瓦 | 11,375 分 | 54.3 FPS | 53.3 dB(A) |
| 涡轮 | 37 瓦 | 670 分 | 110 瓦 | 12,401 分 | 59 FPS | 57.9 dB(A) |
| 电池(平衡) | 35/17 瓦 | 480 分 | 65 瓦 | 9,839 分 | 46.7 FPS | 40 dB(A) |
处理器
月湖 Core Ultra 9 288V允许的最大功耗为 37 瓦,Predator Triton 也做到了这一点。由于单核性能较高,在日常使用中性能也还可以,但 8 核根本无法与竞争对手抗衡,尤其是在多核性能方面。
Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (9091 - 10941, n=4) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (1794 - 2013, n=5) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (4091 - 4230, n=3) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (703 - 777, n=3) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (1500 - 1640, n=3) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (294 - 309, n=2) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (310 - 441, n=4) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (32105 - 36683, n=5) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (5734 - 5993, n=5) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (10969 - 11190, n=5) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (2797 - 2887, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3253, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (9588 - 9745, n=3) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (2024 - 2114, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (11.2 - 14.3, n=3) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (39.9 - 56.9, n=4) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (0.4218 - 0.4503, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (9953 - 13061, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 238426, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (49602 - 64847, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 9817, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (2285 - 2855, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (49647 - 49785, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (4421 - 4424, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 128721, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (26344 - 34507, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (35250 - 39258, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (527 - 629, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (4862 - 7164, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (50790 - 55531, n=3) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
系统性能
总体性能给人的印象很好,在日常使用中没有任何问题。测试期间也没有出现稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9667, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 12600, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 16716, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=132, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7517 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (108104 - 108894, n=3) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 108104, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (86694 - 87810, n=3) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (113427 - 117889, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (97.9 - 98.5, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
测试设备中安装了美光公司的 1 TB SSD(870 GB 可用容量),但销售机型配备的是 2 TB SSD。PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的性能一般,在长时间负载情况下总体保持稳定。
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
专用 GPU 是 GeForce RTX 5070TGP 为 110 瓦,即速度非常快的型号。5070 提供 8GB 的 VRAM,这可能会导致当前游戏的限制,尤其是在高分辨率下,我们将在以下专门文章中讨论 特别文章中详细讨论。图形切换通过常规的 Optimus 技术完成,但安装了一个 MUX 开关,可以完全切换到 dGPU,但这需要重新启动。
纯图形性能基本上还可以,但在游戏时会明显感觉到 Lunar Lake 处理器相当薄弱,无法充分发挥 RTX 5070 的潜力。这里 雷蛇刀锋 14例如,配备 AMD CPU 的 Razer Blade 14 要快 10%。不过,所有现代游戏都可以玩(尤其是全高清),即使不一定能获得最佳细节。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 29568 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24366 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 11572 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2884 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 12857 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (17 - 24, n=23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (29 - 228, n=24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| Average of class Gaming (15 - 228, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (137 - 507, n=21) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
* ... smaller is better
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 116.4 | |||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160 | 142 | 137.6 | 127.5 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 161.8 | 157.8 | 121.8 | 88.8 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 97.7 | 87.9 | 89.7 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 374 | 294 | 251 | 226 | 157.2 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 148.6 | 124 | 108 | 107.2 | 75.2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 122.5 | 117.3 | 100 | 88.6 | 65 | 59 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 197.8 | 195.5 | 190.6 | 78.5 | 78 | 51 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
散热有两个方面。一方面,高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器具有较低的最大功耗,这意味着笔记本在不使用 dGPU 的情况下,即使在 Turbo 模式下,也能在日常工作中保持安静。但是,只要 RTX 5070使用时,风扇的声音就会变得非常大,尽管宏碁已经在这里使用了蒸汽腔。在 Turbo 模式下,噪音高达 57.9 dB(A),非常恼人,而在性能模式下,噪音仍然超过 53 dB(A)。这也使它成为我们对比组中迄今为止噪音最大的设备。没有其他电子噪音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.9 / 24.9 / 30.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36.1 / 57.9 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 Core Ultra 9 288V, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | -9% | -9% | 4% | 11% | 5% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.9 | 23.7 5% | 23.3 6% | 24 4% | 22.9 8% | 24.5 2% | 24 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.9 | 23.7 5% | 29.1 -17% | 29 -16% | 22.9 8% | 24.7 1% | 24 4% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.9 | 23.7 5% | 29.1 -17% | 31 -24% | 28.3 -14% | 24.7 1% | 24 4% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 30.5 | 27 11% | 29.1 5% | 36 -18% | 28.8 6% | 24.7 19% | 28.3 7% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 36.1 | 44.9 -24% | 54.4 -51% | 47 -30% | 37.3 -3% | 25.2 30% | 39.6 -10% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 57.9 | 54.6 6% | 54.4 6% | 50 14% | 50.6 13% | 50.1 13% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 57.9 | 54.6 6% | 54.4 6% | 52 10% | 50.6 13% | 52 10% | 50.1 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 47 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 Core Ultra 9 288V, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -8% | -12% | -21% | -8% | 9% | -12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 42.9 | 47 -10% | 51.2 -19% | 57 -33% | 49.8 -16% | 41.2 4% | 41.6 3% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 47.4 | 49.6 -5% | 50.3 -6% | 55 -16% | 46 3% | 39 18% | 52.7 -11% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27.3 | 29.8 -9% | 30.2 -11% | 32 -17% | 30.2 -11% | 26.2 4% | 32.6 -19% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28.1 | 30.7 -9% | 30.9 -10% | 33 -17% | 29.8 -6% | 25.4 10% | 33.9 -21% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
音响系统由 6 个模块组成,最大音量很高,但扬声器并不令人信服。即使音量在 50%左右,声音也会变得非常闷,播放音乐或电影也不再那么悦耳动听。
Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 14 2025 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源消耗
空闲时,设备需要消耗大量电能,在效率方面也没有优势。只有在负载情况下才会明显感觉到这一点,游戏时约为 135 瓦。因此,随机附带的 140 瓦电源装置刚刚够用,但无法为电池充电等。2.6 瓦的待机功耗过高。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 Core Ultra 9 288V, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | -12% | -22% | -23% | -21% | -31% | -47% | -70% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 9.3 | 9.3 -0% | 6.7 28% | 6 35% | 9.1 2% | 9.1 2% | 11.4 -23% | 11.5 ? -24% | 13.5 ? -45% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 12.2 | 11.1 9% | 8.8 28% | 11 10% | 15.3 -25% | 12.6 -3% | 12.8 -5% | 16.3 ? -34% | 19.3 ? -58% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 12.5 | 11.2 10% | 9.3 26% | 21 -68% | 22.6 -81% | 27.4 -119% | 13.4 -7% | 21.6 ? -73% | 25.8 ? -106% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 68.4 | 91.9 -34% | 121.5 -78% | 93 -36% | 72.1 -5% | 63.5 7% | 103.7 -52% | 102 ? -49% | 110.9 ? -62% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 132.2 | 168.6 -28% | 155.5 -18% | 146.3 -11% | 141.7 -7% | 171.5 -30% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 134 | 171.5 -28% | 157.4 -17% | 147.9 -10% | 144.7 -8% | 171.5 -28% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 145.4 | 195 -34% | 218.1 -50% | 252 -73% | 198 -36% | 135.3 7% | 246.8 -70% | 227 ? -56% | 260 ? -79% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 118.9 |
* ... smaller is better
能耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
带外部监控器的能耗
电池寿命
76 瓦时的电池可实现合理的运行时间,但 Lunar Lake 处理器在这方面并不占优势。在 150 cd/m² 的 WLAN 测试中,宏碁的续航时间为 9 小时,在全亮度下为 6:45 小时,仅次于 雷蛇刀锋 14(72 Wh),但也明显落后于 ROG Zephyrus G14(73 Wh)。
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52
- 12/28/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52 Intel Core Ultra 9 288V ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $69.99 PowerPortnerLink 330W 280W C... 2. $2,599.99 acer Predator Triton 14 AI P... List Price: 2999€ | 1.6 kg | 17.31 mm | 14.50" 2880x1800 234 PPI OLED | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,067.90 Razer Blade 14 (2025) Gaming... 2. $2,099.99 Razer Blade 14 (2025) Gaming... 3. $1,799.99 Razer Blade 14 (2025) Gaming... List Price: 2399€ | 1.6 kg | 16.2 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. JUYOON 240W Laptop Charger C... 2. $52.99 180W AC Charger for Asus ROG... 3. $1,593.00 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... List Price: 3899€ | 1.6 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,699.00 List Price: 2100 Euro | 1.9 kg | 20.9 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI IPS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1500 USD | 1.5 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,549.00 HP OMEN Transcend 14-fb0761n... 2. $1,649.00 HP Omen Transcend 14 Gaming ... 3. $38.99 Replacement Backlit Keyboard... List Price: 1700 USD | 1.6 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 Intel Core i7-13650HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,668.00 Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 15.1... 2. $1,429.99 Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX10 15.1... 3. $1,919.00 Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 Gami... List Price: 1499€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.






































































