结论惠普 EliteBook 14 仍是不错的选择
在商业领域，惠普是当之无愧的大鱼之一，因为其面向商业领域的惠普 EliteBook 系列依然出色如初。最新推出的 HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 同时配备了英特尔和 AMD 两种处理器。我们测试的 AMD 版本电池续航时间长，同时运行凉爽、安静，性能卓越。我们的评测机使用的是 AMD 更新的 Zen4 CPU，它可能不是最新的，但仍具有强大的性能，而且价格更实惠。
新更名的 EliteBook 8 采用了全新的设计，继续提供出色的可升级性、可维修性、丰富的端口和安全功能，以及非常漂亮的输入设备，这些都是难以超越的。机箱质量很好，虽然屏幕可能不会获奖，但在办公室内外的日常使用中非常实用。此外，扬声器的效果也出乎意料地好。总之，我们几乎找不到这款优秀办公笔记本电脑的任何缺点。
Pros
Cons
惠普面向大型企业客户的主线笔记本电脑系列多年来一直被称为惠普EliteBook 800，确切地说，是从2014年开始的。十年后，惠普决定改革他们的命名系统，因此惠普EliteBook 800变成了惠普EliteBook 8。就我们的评测设备 HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 而言，它是 HP EliteBook 845 G11 的直接继承者。 HP EliteBook 845 G11.不过，这不仅仅是一个新名字：惠普还重新设计了这款备受欢迎的企业笔记本电脑，同时提供 AMD 和英特尔两种选择。由于我们的机型是G1a，因此我们将在此介绍 AMD Ryzen 版本。
规格AMD Ryzen 7 和 WUXGA 屏幕
外壳铝制惠普 EliteBook 重获新生
与旧版本相比 HP EliteBook 845 G11惠普对新款惠普EliteBook 8 G1a 14的机身设计进行了全面改造。惠普保留了银色铝合金和屏幕周围黑色塑料边框的基本配色方案，但也有一些重大变化：前角更加圆润，键盘现在是灰色而不是黑色，铰链现在只允许打开大约 170 度的角度，而不是 180 度。此外，惠普还在触控板前方增加了一个小凹槽，这样可以让用户更轻松地打开触控板。
铝制机身的质量无可挑剔。它不会轻易弯曲或扭曲，尤其是底座没有任何松动。当然，与镁合金或塑料相比，铝合金更容易凹陷，但金属的触感非常细腻。此外，银色的铝材完全不会留下任何指纹。说到机身，我们只有一个小小的批评：屏幕无法单手打开，而且确实有一点晃动。
新款惠普EliteBook笔记本电脑比旧款略轻，但差别不大，只有约20克。同样，尺寸差别也不大，与惠普EliteBook 845 G11相比，新款EliteBook 8的宽度略小，但深度和厚度略有增加。戴尔 戴尔 Pro 14 Premium和 联想 ThinkPad T14s 6 代都比惠普笔记本电脑更轻巧。
连接性USB-C 两侧充电
惠普精心更新了 EliteBook 系列的端口选择，用另一个 USB-C 端口取代了一个 USB-A 端口。优点现在可以从两侧为设备充电。不过，新的右侧 USB-C 端口并不能提供与左侧相同的功能，因为它缺少 Thunderbolt 4 功能。
RJ45 以太网接口并不在我们评测机型的套件中，而是作为可选功能提供。
交流
HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 中的联发科 Wi-Fi 网卡是一种现代的 Wi-Fi 7 解决方案，确保了 EliteBook 笔记本电脑的长期可行性。Wi-Fi 网速非常快，不过接收数据时的速度比发送数据时快。
可以选择购买带 5G 功能的惠普笔记本电脑--我们的机型没有这项功能，以后也无法升级。
网络摄像头
在当今这个时代，500 万像素的网络摄像头对于昂贵的笔记本电脑来说已经足够了。在惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 上，网络摄像头提供的图像足以满足基本的视频通话需求。
安全
作为一款纯正的商务笔记本电脑，惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 14 具有多项安全功能。其中指纹传感器、红外网络摄像头和智能卡读卡器都可用于身份验证和登录。物理网络摄像头盖可保护用户隐私，Kensington 锁槽可防止小偷作案。在更基本的层面上，惠普 EliteBook 笔记本电脑采用了专用的 TPM 2.0 芯片。
配件
除了 65 W USB-C 充电器外，惠普没有在包装盒中放置任何其他配件。
维护
固定底盖的螺丝总共只有四颗。取下底盖后，就可以看到惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 14 的所有内部组件。这包括 M.2 2280 固态硬盘、隐藏在小金属片下面的两个内存插槽以及电池、风扇和模块化 Wi-Fi 卡。
可持续性
作为一家大型企业供应商，惠普提供了大量有关 HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 可持续发展的信息。其中包括二氧化碳当量排放量--生产该产品时会排放 155 千克二氧化碳当量。除此之外，惠普还宣传该产品的包装是 100% 由可回收材料制成的，机箱的某些部件（如键盘）也是如此。
保修
在原产国（德国），惠普为我们的评测设备提供三年保修服务。这是取货和退货服务，这意味着惠普将收集设备到维修中心进行维修。保修期的可选升级包括现场服务和保修期延长至五年。
输入设备：出色的 HP EliteBook 键盘
键盘
在市面上的笔记本电脑中，惠普 EliteBooks 的键盘是最好的键盘之一。1.5 毫米行程的 Chiclet 键具有极佳的键入感，让输入长文本变得轻而易举。按键的大小也很合适，只有边缘的几个按键宽度略有减小。不过，我们对键盘的布局不太满意，因为方向键太小，而且没有分组 F 键。
触摸板
惠普 EliteBook 笔记本电脑的玻璃触摸板尺寸为 12.5 x 8 厘米，对于一款 14 英寸笔记本电脑来说大小适中。这是一块非常漂亮的触摸板，表面质量很高，机械质量也很好，不过，如果能有一块可以在任何位置点击的触觉触摸板就更好了--这块潜水板式触摸板只能在下半部分点击。
显示屏HP EliteBook 笔记本电脑中的哑光低功耗屏幕
HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 共有四种不同的 IPS LED 屏幕，均为 14 英寸 16:10 雾面屏幕：
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200), 300 cd/m², 62.5 % sRGB, 低能耗
- WUXGA（1,920 x 1,200），400 cd/m²，100 % sRGB，低功耗
- 2.5K/WQXGA (2,560 x 1,600), 400 cd/m², 100 % AdobeRGB/DCI P3, 120 Hz VRR
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200), 800 cd/m², 100 % sRGB, SureView 5
我们评测设备中使用的 LG 面板的亮度超过了承诺的 400 cd/m²。它不是一款速度特别快的面板，但这对于用于办公的 IPS 屏幕来说很正常，问题不大。没有 PWM，这是好事。值得注意的是黑色值较低，对比度良好。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 444 cd/m²
Contrast: 2337:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
calibrated: 1.7
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
69.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
96% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
CCT: 6295 K
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET LGD079D, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook 845 G11 BOE0B6D, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 120 Hz | Dell Pro 14 Premium LG Phillips 140WT1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 MNE007JA1-2 , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI LG Philips LGD07A1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 26% | 30% | 4% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 67.1 | 98.5 47% | 99 48% | 69.6 4% | 62.6 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 96 | 99.9 4% | 100 4% | 99.8 4% | 93.2 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 69.2 | 87.5 26% | 95.8 38% | 71.4 3% | 64 -8% |
| Response Times | 71% | 93% | -9% | -51% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 31.4 ? | 11.9 ? 62% | 1.4 ? 96% | 33.6 ? -7% | 55.8 ? -78% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 24.5 ? | 5 ? 80% | 2.7 ? 89% | 26.9 ? -10% | 30.5 ? -24% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 241.1 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 32 | ||||
| Screen | 3% | 15% | 21% | -21% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 444 | 576 30% | 392.3 -12% | 436 -2% | 442.8 0% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 434 | 533 23% | 392 -10% | 420 -3% | 412 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 83 -12% | 95 1% | 93 -1% | 87 -7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.19 | 0.47 -147% | 0.24 -26% | 0.22 -16% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 2337 | 1226 -48% | 1817 -22% | 2013 -14% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 1.8 47% | 3.39 -0% | 1.2 65% | 5.92 -74% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7 | 4 43% | 6.53 7% | 3.5 50% | 10.46 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.7 | 1 41% | 0.99 42% | 0.7 59% | 1.31 23% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 2.5 52% | 1.1 79% | 1.4 73% | 7.6 -46% |
| Gamma | 2.04 108% | 2.15 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6295 103% | 6297 103% | 6502 100% | 6477 100% | 6728 97% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 33% /
18% | 46% /
32% | 5% /
13% | -26% /
-22% |
* ... smaller is better
出厂时，面板的颜色有点过绿，我们使用 i1Pro 3 和 X-Rite i1Profiler 进行了校正。在我们应用自定义色彩配置文件（可在上面的灰色框中免费下载）后，色彩大多是中性的（Calman ColorChecker 平均值：1.7）。
惠普承诺 100 % sRGB，而该面板能达到 96 %。它适用于简单的色彩工作和照片编辑。
由于屏幕亮度高，惠普 EliteBook 笔记本电脑在办公室外也能使用。只有阳光直射才会对磨砂屏幕造成影响。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8214 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能AMD Ryzen 7 250 依然适合办公室使用
惠普为 EliteBook 8 G1a 14 提供了四款不同的处理器，它们全部来自 AMD，其中基于 Zen4 的 Hawk Point Refresh 和基于 Zen5 的 Krackan Point 各有两款。AMD Ryzen 5 230, Ryzen 7 250, Ryzen AI 5 340, Ryzen AI 7 350).它们都使用 AMD Radeon GPU，但根据所选 CPU 的不同，性能略有不同（如AMD Radeon 760M, Radeon 780M, Radeon 840M, Radeon 860M).内存最高可扩展至 64 GB DDR5-5600 内存（2x SO-DIMM），惠普提供最大 2 TB M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe 4.0 SSD 存储。
测试条件
这款惠普 EliteBook 几乎只提供单一的能耗配置文件，其中 CPU 的能耗最高可达 30 W，在持续负载情况下可降至 25 W。
处理器
......（英文 AMD Ryzen 7 250是一款全新的鹰点 CPU，在技术上与 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U和 Ryzen 7 8840U.八个 Zen4 内核的时钟频率为 3.3 至 5.1 GHz。有关与其他处理器的进一步基准比较，请参阅我们的 CPU 列表.
与早期的 HP EliteBook 845 G11相比，新款 EliteBook 8 G1a 14 在多核负载方面的表现略微令人失望。不过，这也不足为奇，因为较新的机型在较低的 TDP 值下运行处理器。整体性能仍然很好，与基于 Strix Point 的 Ryzen AI 7 Pro 360 中的较新机型相当。 联想 ThinkPad T14s 6 代相比，后者仅在单核负载方面更胜一筹。当然，与 12 核的 Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 375的 惠普 EliteBook X G1a.
在电池模式下，CPU 完全没有节流。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (12275 - 16154, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (1649 - 1737, n=3) | |
| Average of class Office (708 - 2130, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (4901 - 6320, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (655 - 694, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average of class Office (285 - 815, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (2002 - 2544, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (263 - 279, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average of class Office (99.5 - 312, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (204 - 249, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (57662 - 63475, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (6163 - 6485, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average of class Office (3046 - 6497, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (9956 - 11206, n=3) | |
| Average of class Office (757 - 14998, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (2499 - 2623, n=3) | |
| Average of class Office (462 - 2894, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (9458 - 10350, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (1532 - 14192, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (1861 - 1934, n=3) | |
| Average of class Office (510 - 2128, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (15 - 18.1, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (1.72 - 22.4, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (52.1 - 67, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Average of class Office (41.5 - 129.6, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.06, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (0.4471 - 0.502, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (19614 - 24656, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (1685 - 31245, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (79019 - 98709, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (8977 - 125394, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (3817 - 4563, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 5398, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (97511 - 114915, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average of class Office (20636 - 115197, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (12847 - 14798, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average of class Office (1064 - 18321, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (42572 - 53836, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (4415 - 66922, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (68090 - 74185, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (850 - 1074, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average of class Office (138.6 - 1366, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (10504 - 13039, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (859 - 17834, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average of class Office (9310 - 55359, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (23228 - 40403, n=3) | |
系统性能
在系统性能方面，惠普EliteBook 8 G1a 14的合成基准测试成绩低于许多竞争对手。不过，它的日常性能仍然非常出色。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M | |
| Average of class Office | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (6437 - 6498, n=2) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average of class Office (2823 - 7626, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (6567 - 11594, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (9800 - 10121, n=2) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (8865 - 9001, n=2) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10925, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (8174 - 8333, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 11108, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (1556 - 1581, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (1524 - 1550, n=2) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1880, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (1667 - 1784, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (319 - 2155, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (1228 - 1281, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 1877, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (281 - 281, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (232 - 238, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Office (391 - 1966, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M (558 - 591, n=2) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6437 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average of class Office (19927 - 108783, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (35172 - 68811, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average of class Office (10084 - 127282, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (30770 - 60683, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average of class Office (20073 - 117935, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (40057 - 86628, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (94.1 - 98.4, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
惠普 EliteBook 笔记本电脑似乎存在一些与 DPC 延迟相关的掉线问题，其中一些问题可能会在未来的固件更新中得到解决。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
惠普使用的是容量为 1 TB 的快速三星固态硬盘。NVMe PCIe 4.0 M.2 2280 固态硬盘在日常使用中表现出色，即使在我们的比较中，其他大多数固态硬盘的速度都更快。值得注意的是，当固态硬盘处于持续负载状态时，性能也不会下降。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
迚ケ谿オ譎る俣 AMD Radeon 780M是一款过时的 iGPU。在惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 14 中，它再次显示出无法与更先进的竞争对手竞争，尤其是 英特尔 ARC 140V尤其是英特尔 Lunar Lake 平台的英特尔 ARC 140V。对于办公环境中的日常使用来说，iGPU 已经绰绰有余，甚至还能玩一些游戏，尽管图形保真度有所降低。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11708 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6889 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2829 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium -1! | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average of class Office (6.13 - 29.6, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average of class Office (6.83 - 31.6, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average of class Office (6.45 - 36.5, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Average of class Office (10.9 - 92.6, n=71, last 2 years) | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 156.3 | 138.8 | 49.4 | 20.9 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 147.8 | 109.7 | 45.8 | 42.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 73.4 | 36.5 | 26.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49.9 | 36.5 | 31.3 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 33.9 | 25.4 | 21.2 | 20.6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 33.1 | 23.7 | 21.4 | 18.2 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 49.6 | 38.9 | 30.1 |
发射：作为一款办公笔记本电脑，扬声器的音质出奇的好
系统噪音
如果把惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 14 说成是一台吵闹的电脑，那就大错特错了。在日常使用中，该设备保持完全静音。不过，如果风扇开启，声音会很快变得明显--在平均负载下为 39.1 dB(a)，明显高于许多竞争对手。至少，在最大负载情况下，该设备的噪音不会太大，42.4 分贝（a）的最大值也不是特别响亮。
我们在这款惠普 EliteBook 笔记本电脑上没有发现线圈啸叫。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 23.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39.1 / 42.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.7 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET Radeon 780M, R7 250, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW | HP EliteBook 845 G11 Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 8840HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Dell Pro 14 Premium Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV1T02 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 1% | 1% | 4% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.7 | 25.4 -7% | 23.1 3% | 23.6 -0% | 24 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.7 | 25.4 -7% | 23.1 3% | 23.6 -0% | 24.4 -3% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.7 | 25.4 -7% | 23.1 3% | 26.5 -12% | 24.4 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23.7 | 25.4 -7% | 23.1 3% | 27.6 -16% | 24.5 -3% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 39.1 | 37.4 4% | 38.2 2% | 26.5 32% | 25.4 35% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 42.4 | 39.8 6% | 44.2 -4% | 41.9 1% | 39.3 7% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 42.3 | 45.3 -7% | 44.2 -4% | 41.8 1% | 43.1 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在持续负载的情况下，惠普 EliteBook 8 G1a 14 的外部温度也不会超过 41.3 摄氏度或 106 华氏度。
在我们进行的一小时压力测试中，完全没有出现节流现象。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-5.2 °C / -9.3 F).
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET AMD Ryzen 7 250, AMD Radeon 780M | HP EliteBook 845 G11 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Dell Pro 14 Premium Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, AMD Radeon 880M | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, AMD Radeon 890M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -15% | 12% | -10% | 12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 41.3 | 45.9 -11% | 33 20% | 45.9 -11% | 36 13% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 40.5 | 53.2 -31% | 28 31% | 48.7 -20% | 34.2 16% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27.4 | 29.5 -8% | 28 -2% | 29.6 -8% | 25 9% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28.6 | 30.8 -8% | 28.8 -1% | 28.5 -0% | 25.6 10% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
出乎意料的好：惠普使用的扬声器既响亮又能提供一定的低音。总的来说，使用这款办公笔记本电脑听音乐是一件非常惬意的事。
HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dell Pro 14 Premium audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理：14 小时电池寿命
耗电量
EliteBook 8 G1a 14 是一款相当省电的笔记本电脑，怠速功耗约为 3 W，当屏幕打开并打开无线电设备时，功耗会翻倍达到 6 W。它的能效仅略低于基于 Zen5 处理器的 联想 ThinkPad T14s AMD 6 代.
EliteBook 的最大功耗为 50.5 瓦，完全符合 65 瓦充电器的容量要求。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle | 3.2 / 5.2 / 6.1 Watt |
| Load |
41.8 / 50.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET R7 250, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G11 R7 PRO 8840HS, Radeon 780M, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Pro 14 Premium Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, Radeon 880M, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Radeon 890M, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -53% | -3% | 1% | -82% | -61% | -30% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.2 | 4.3 -34% | 3.5 -9% | 2.8 12% | 6.5 -103% | 6.08 ? -90% | 4.52 ? -41% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 5.2 | 10.6 -104% | 4.3 17% | 5.1 2% | 8.7 -67% | 8.22 ? -58% | 7.42 ? -43% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 6.1 | 10.9 -79% | 7.9 -30% | 5.8 5% | 10.3 -69% | 10.4 ? -70% | 8.78 ? -44% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 41.8 | 58.3 -39% | 38.9 7% | 33.1 21% | 75.7 -81% | 57.2 ? -37% | 41.6 ? -0% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 42.1 | 60.2 -43% | 39 7% | 44.6 -6% | 76.2 -81% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 41.6 | 59.3 -43% | 38.7 7% | 39.4 5% | 73.1 -76% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 50.5 | 65.4 -30% | 60.7 -20% | 66.4 -31% | 100.7 -99% | 76.3 ? -51% | 62.4 ? -24% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
惠普将电池容量从 56 Wh 增加到 62 Wh。EliteBook 8 G1a 14 的电池续航时间（14 小时）比 EliteBook 845 G11 的电池续航时间（14 小时）有所提高，这一点也不足为奇。 EliteBook 845 G11(在我们的 Wi-Fi 网上冲浪测试中（亮度为 150 cd/m²），EliteBook 8 G1a 14 的电池使用时间（14 小时）比 EliteBook 845 G11 的（10 小时）有所延长，这一点不足为奇。
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET R7 250, Radeon 780M, 62 Wh | HP EliteBook 845 G11 R7 PRO 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 56 Wh | Dell Pro 14 Premium Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, Radeon 880M, 58 Wh | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Radeon 890M, 74.5 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -28% | 7% | -9% | 0% | -7% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 14.2 | 10.2 -28% | 15.2 7% | 14.1 -1% | 14.2 0% | 11.8 ? -17% |
| Load (h) | 1.8 | 1.5 -17% | 1.88 ? 4% |
笔记本检查评级
惠普的 EliteBook 8 G1a 14 是办公笔记本电脑的不错选择。配备 AMD Ryzen 7 250 的版本价格更实惠，同时还能满足我们对商务笔记本电脑的所有期望，无论是质量还是效率。
HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET
- 10/06/2025 v8
Benjamin Herzig
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87.3%  | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,091.72 List Price: 1695 Euro | 1.4 kg | 19.1 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS LED |
2. 88.5%  | HP EliteBook 845 G11 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,064.77 HP EliteBook 845 G11 14" Tou... 2. $1,133.98 HP EliteBook 845 G11 14" Not... 3. $1,049.99 HP EliteBook 840 G11 Busines... List Price: 1939€ | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS |
3. 86.4%  | Dell Pro 14 Premium Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $35.99 GVKRLXZ 100W USB C PD3.0 Fas... 2. $22.99 Alapmk Protective Case for D... 3. $49.99 Smatree Laptop Sleeve for 14... List Price: 2500 USD | 1.3 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
4. 87.5%  | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,399.99 Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 2... 2. $1,694.99 Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 2... 3. $1,439.99 Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 La... List Price: 1500 Euro | 1.3 kg | 19.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS LED |
5. 88.7%  | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,259.99 List Price: 2200 USD | 1.5 kg | 13.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
