惠普EliteBook 865 G10笔记本电脑评测--被Sure View毁掉的高性能商务笔记本电脑

Name: HP EliteBook 865 G10
Brand: HP

没有 Sure View 肯定会更好。 惠普又发布了一款配备智能卡和各种安全功能的 EliteBook 865 商务笔记本电脑，并升级了 Zen 4 处理器。请阅读我们的深度评测，了解它还有哪些新功能。

Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/08/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Business Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Thunderbolt Ultrabook Zen 4

EliteBook 系列是惠普高端商务笔记本的代名词。轻薄的 865 G10 配备了 LTE 支持、智能卡读卡器和大量安全功能。去年，EliteBook 系列还增加了一款 16 英寸机型。现在，第一次更新已经到来。惠普这次又带来了什么？

乍一看，G10 与上一代产品 G9 相比变化不大前代机型 G9.但是，惠普只是用 Zen 4 处理器更新了 EliteBook 系列，还是有其他改进？Zen 4 处理器与前代机型的 Zen 3 芯片相比又有何不同？喜欢小一点的用户还可以查看我们对 14 英寸 HP Elite 845 G10 的评测。.

在这篇评测中，我们不仅会比较当前机型和前代机型，还会分析它与其他高端商务笔记本电脑的对比情况，例如联想 ThinkPad P16s G2和宏碁 Swift Edge 16、联想联想 ThinkPad T16 G2和 Galaxy Book3 Pro 16.

Test device courtesy of HP

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook 865 G10 (EliteBook 865 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 780M, 31.0.14070.15002

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, InfoVision IVO3E94 (X160NV42 R0), IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, 1024 GB

, 860 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 PC-Card, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.3, LTE

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.2 x 358.7 x 251

Battery

76 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: IR webcam
Primary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty, 3-year hardware support

Weight

1.887 kg, Power Supply: 449 g

Price

1504 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.8 %	03/2024	HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	1.9 kg	19.2 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
87.2 %	12/2022	HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	1.9 kg	19 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
88.6 %	01/2024	Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	1.8 kg	24.4 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
88.6 %	10/2023	Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M	1.2 kg	13 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
90 %	08/2023	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.8 kg	20.5 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
85.6 %	05/2023	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.6 kg	12.5 mm	16.00"	2880x1800

机箱 - EliteBook 16，银色金属机箱

银色铝制机身的所有边缘都是圆角。金属材质使底座非常坚固，我们在扭转测试中只听到了轻微的嘎吱声。显示屏盖也相当坚固，但自然更容易弯曲。只有显示屏周围的边框由光滑的黑色塑料制成。盖子前端有一个凹槽，可以单手打开笔记本电脑。

机盖可向后折叠近 180 度。中间长长的铰链也很牢固，但在打开或轻微晃动后，显示屏仍会有短暂的轻微晃动。触摸板左上角和右上角上方有两个小橡胶垫，可确保合上盖子时显示屏不会被键盘面板刮伤。

EliteBook 的尺寸偏小。竞争对手通常要深几毫米或宽几毫米。不过，在厚度方面并非总是如此，因为无论是宏碁 Swift Edge和三星Galaxy Book都比 EliteBook 薄得多。另一方面，两款 ThinkPad 的厚度稍厚，这意味着就厚度而言，865 G10 处于中间位置。

EliteBook 865 的重量为 1.9 千克（4.2 磅），在我们的对比中处于较重的一端。两款 ThinkPad 的重量都减轻了约 100 克（0.2 磅），而超薄的宏碁和三星笔记本则更轻。

尺寸比较

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE HP EliteBook 865 G9 HP EliteBook 865 G10 Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 DIN A4 ❌

规格 - 智能卡和 LTE，但没有局域网或 SD 读卡器

对于一款超极本来说，输入/输出选项相当不错。共有四个 USB 端口：两个 Type-A 和两个 Type-C。

不过，EliteBook 缺少一个 SD 读卡器和一个 LAN 端口。无论如何，在这个级别的笔记本电脑上缺少后者并不奇怪。有趣的功能包括一个智能卡读卡器和一个支持 LTE 的 SIM 卡插槽。

所有端口都位于两侧靠后的位置，这样在使用鼠标时可以给手部提供更多空间。HDMI 和 USB-A 端口之间的距离可以稍远一些。

左：HDMI 2.1、USB-A（5 Gbps）、2x USB-C Thunderbolt 4（带 PD 和 DP）（40 Gbps

右侧SIM 卡插槽、Kensington 插槽、USB-A（5 Gbps）、3.5 毫米耳机插孔

连接性

由于笔记本电脑没有以太网端口，因此 Wi-Fi 起着特别重要的作用。与HP Spectre x360 16 （支持 Wi-Fi 7）不同，HP EliteBook 使用的是 Realtek Wi-Fi 6E 网卡。

传输速度非常好，但上一代机型使用的高通适配器的效果略好。

。

此外，LTE 插槽还可使用 Nano SIM 卡。LTE 连接由英特尔 XMM 7560 LTE Advanced Pro 调制解调器处理。惠普提供 5G 模块选项，但其可用性可能因地区而异，而且显然尚未最终确定。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC (1549 - 1793, n=2)	1671 MBit/s +8%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Qualcomm Fast Connect 6900 Wi-Fi 6E Dual Band Simultaneous	1633 (1575^min - 1713^max) MBit/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1619 (1559^min - 1692^max) MBit/s +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC	1549 (838^min - 1641^max) MBit/s
Average of class Office (47.8 - 1793, n=90, last 2 years)	1103 MBit/s -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	754 (634^min - 828^max) MBit/s -51%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	537 (404^min - 674^max) MBit/s -65%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Qualcomm WCN685x	521 (408^min - 583^max) MBit/s -66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Qualcomm Fast Connect 6900 Wi-Fi 6E Dual Band Simultaneous	1709 (1600^min - 1748^max) MBit/s +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Qualcomm WCN685x	1590 (1465^min - 1635^max) MBit/s +13%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC (1407 - 1685, n=2)	1546 MBit/s +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1534 (674^min - 1619^max) MBit/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1529 (1477^min - 1553^max) MBit/s +9%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1443 (1217^min - 1552^max) MBit/s +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC	1407 (1376^min - 1429^max) MBit/s
Average of class Office (104.2 - 1752, n=92, last 2 years)	1248 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
HP EliteBook 865 G10 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC	1689 (1364^min - 1812^max) MBit/s
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC ()	1689 MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1623 (1172^min - 1690^max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Office (685 - 1961, n=50, last 2 years)	1377 MBit/s -18%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1256 (1053^min - 1428^max) MBit/s -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	713 (531^min - 826^max) MBit/s -58%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Qualcomm WCN685x	639 (603^min - 681^max) MBit/s -62%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Qualcomm WCN685x	1712 (1661^min - 1745^max) MBit/s +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC	1683 (844^min - 1702^max) MBit/s
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC ()	1683 MBit/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1581 (1354^min - 1630^max) MBit/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1502 (1405^min - 1524^max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Office (720 - 1782, n=51, last 2 years)	1496 MBit/s -11%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1225 (1094^min - 1371^max) MBit/s -27%

HP EliteBook 865 G10 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1689 (1364-1812)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1256 (1053-1428)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1623 (1172-1690)

HP EliteBook 865 G10 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1654 (844-1702)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1225 (1094-1371)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1501 (1405-1524)

HP EliteBook 865 G10 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1521 (838-1641)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø537 (404-674)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1619 (1559-1692)

HP EliteBook 865 G10 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1406 (1376-1429)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1442 (1217-1552)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1528 (1477-1553)

网络摄像头

惠普为 G10 配备了与 Windows Hello 兼容的 500 万像素红外网络摄像头。虽然前代产品也配备了 500 万像素的红外摄像头，但它只能拍摄分辨率为 370 万像素（2,560 x 1,440 像素）的照片。相比之下，现在的机型可以拍摄 3,840 x 2,160 像素的图像。

撇开分辨率不谈，根据我们的测量，色差也太大了。这主要是因为网络摄像头倾向于在某些区域严重曝光过度，以避免主体显得太暗。

网络摄像头的一些功能也可以通过 myHP 软件进行控制，包括自动取景、分辨率和一些图像增强（或恶化）选项，如 "自然色调"（增强肤色并使图像呈现红色）和 "外观滤镜"。后者似乎只是柔化了图像，使图像变得模糊。
。

一个有趣的功能可能是 "混合器 "选项。当连接了多台摄像机时，您可以使用该选项来安排不同的馈送，甚至是流媒体，就像某种 OBS 超级精简版。

ColorChecker HP EliteBook 865 G10: 22.48 ∆E min: 3.02 - max: 31.88 ∆E

安全

惠普试图通过一系列安全功能和软件来吸引买家。首先，我们的评测机配备了指纹扫描仪。不过，根据惠普的脚注，并非所有 SKU 都配备了这种扫描仪，而是必须在配置过程中选择的可选功能。

启动笔记本电脑后，屏幕上会出现 "HP Wolf Security "标识。惠普表示，该安全软件旨在加强 "贵公司的网络抵御能力"。你可以点击这个链接进入惠普网站了解更多信息。但该软件不会永远运行。在购买笔记本电脑时，你会收到一份许可协议，许可期限与保修期一致（详见下文）。许可证到期后，您需要续约才能继续使用软件。集成软件解决方案 HP Sure Click Pro 和 HP Sure Sense Pro 也是如此。

下面的截图显示了制造商的安全管理功能和应用程序。

配件和保修

除了一个 USB-C 充电器和一些文件外，包装中没有其他额外物品。

惠普在保修方面有些含糊其辞。制造商提到了为期一年的有限保修（1/1/0），包括一年的部件和人工保修，以及三年的次工作日现场硬件支持服务（含差旅）。

当我们在惠普网站上输入序列号时，系统只显示保修期为一年。惠普为笔记本电脑提供了无数的延保选项，但需要额外付费（见截图）。

升级和维护

底盖由五颗简单的十字头固定螺钉固定，这意味着用户不太可能不小心弄混或放错螺钉。拧松螺丝后，最简单的方法就是从显示屏后面掀开底盖。

一般来说，内部的大部分硬件都可以维护或更换，包括风扇、电池、固态硬盘、内存、Wi-Fi 适配器和 WWAN 模块。不过，有几个组件位于牢固连接的金属护罩下面，其中一些还用胶带进一步连接和固定。这样就很难接触到这些组件，可能会阻碍一些用户进行维护。

输入设备 - 舒适安静地打字和点击

键盘

与往常一样，惠普为 G10 设计了非常整洁的键盘布局，包括一个数字键盘。电源键的位置（顶行中间，打印和删除键之间）和半高的上下方向键则稍显不理想。

这些按键之间有一定的间隙，但本身却很小（约 1.5 厘米或 0.6 英寸）。按键的行程短而适中，但反馈清晰，很容易感觉到。即便如此，按键的声音还是非常小。因此，这款键盘可以让你快速键入，整体感觉非常出色。在 EliteBook 865 G10 的键盘上书写是一种愉悦的体验。

在黑暗的环境中，具有两级亮度的单区白色背光使键帽字母（包括特殊功能键上的字母）清晰易读。

触摸板

触摸板尺寸适中（约 12.7 x 8.5 厘米，或 5 x 3.3 英寸），表面非常光滑，即使缓慢移动手指也几乎没有阻力。多点触摸手势也能顺利识别。集成按钮的点击点清晰明确，工作稳定。按键发出的 "嗒嗒 "声非常柔和悦耳。不过，在游戏等极端应用中，触摸板的输入和响应之间可能会有轻微延迟（例如在Witcher 3 中）。

显示屏 - 确定视图尚未改进

去年，我们已经批评过 G9 的显示屏（实际上可以达到 1000 尼特）的 Sure View 隐私滤镜。惠普显然没有听进去，因为隐私滤镜对 G10 来说仍然是祸而不是福。这款笔记本电脑采用了 InfoVision 生产的 16 英寸 IPS 面板。这是一款 1200p 显示屏，宽高比为 16:10，刷新率仅为 60Hz。它的亮度应该可以达到 1000 尼特。但问题就是从这里开始的。

我们测得的最大峰值亮度为 865 尼特，而整个面板的平均亮度 "只有 "724 尼特，大约低了 140 尼特！这是因为，尤其是最下面一行的三个测量点产生的亮度水平明显较低，这就导致亮度分布不均匀（47%），这是可以理解的。即使是前代机型在这方面也做得更好。虽然最下面一排的亮度仍高于其他一些笔记本电脑的显示屏，但即使在禁用 Sure View 功能的情况下，屏幕也非常依赖于观看的角度。如果你没有将笔记本电脑设置在一个理想的角度，显示屏很快就会显得更暗、对比度更低。尽管亮度很高，但至少黑度相当低，这使显示屏具有相当好的对比度。

一旦启用 Sure View 隐私滤镜，屏幕中间的亮度最多会降至 120 尼特。不用说，这样的亮度太低，无法提供良好的观看体验。这就是为什么我们不太理解这个滤镜的原因。一旦激活，屏幕上的内容通常会变得非常暗，以至于你甚至不想在笔记本电脑上工作。此外，即使禁用了 Sure View，图像质量仍然比没有使用该滤镜的笔记本电脑差很多。

该显示屏还存在相对严重的背光渗漏和响应时间短的问题，这与 G9 上的显示屏十分相似。更不用说它使用的是 PWM 技术，频率会根据所选亮度的高低而变化（见下文）。

但我们有办法解决这个问题。在配置过程中，有多种显示选项可供选择。虽然没有不带 Sure View 的 1,000 尼特型号，但惠普提供了防眩光 WUXGA IPS 显示屏（1,920 x 1,200），亮度为 400 尼特，功耗更低，同样覆盖 100% sRGB。


825 cd/m²	875 cd/m²	799 cd/m²
801 cd/m²	865 cd/m²	891 cd/m²
420 cd/m²	500 cd/m²	544 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

InfoVision IVO3E94 (X160NV42 R0) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 891 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 724.4 cd/m² Minimum: 42.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 47 %
Center on Battery: 860 cd/m²
Contrast: 2544:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.86 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.05
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.66

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	HP EliteBook 865 G10 InfoVision IVO3E94 (X160NV42 R0), IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	HP EliteBook 865 G9 X160NV42, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE ATNA60YV04-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00	Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo MNG007JA1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00
Display		-2%	22%	23%	-6%	22%
Display P3 Coverage	72.8	71.4 -2%	99.9 37%	99.9 37%	67 -8%	99.7 37%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	99.3 -1%	100 0%	100 0%	96.9 -3%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	75	73.2 -2%	96.9 29%	100 33%	69.3 -8%	97 29%
Response Times		-16%	34%	46%	31%	95%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	48 ?(21.8, 26.2)	35.5 ?(17.1, 18.1) 26%	1.5 ?(0.8, 0.7) 97%	0.57 ?(0.28, 0.29) 99%	32 ?(15, 17) 33%	2 ?(1, 1) 96%
Response Time Black / White *	27.6 ?(14.6, 13)	23.5 ?(13.4, 10.1) 15%	1.3 ?(0.7, 0.6) 95%	1 ?(0.55, 0.45) 96%	20 ?(10, 10) 28%	2 ?(1, 1) 93%
PWM Frequency	550	56.7 -90%	60 -89%	238.8 -57%
Screen		22%	9%	26%	21%	122%
Brightness middle	865	865 0%	416 -52%	379.8 -56%	446 -48%	412 -52%
Brightness	724	771 6%	421 -42%	383 -47%	414 -43%	412 -43%
Brightness Distribution	47	72 53%	98 109%	98 109%	86 83%	98 109%
Black Level *	0.34	0.3 12%			0.32 6%	0.015 96%
Contrast	2544	2883 13%			1394 -45%	27467 980%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.86	2.4 51%	1.3 73%	4.7 3%	1.5 69%	2.34 52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.58	5.8 50%	2.8 76%	7.51 35%	2.2 81%	3.34 71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.05	1.5 -43%	2.9 -176%	0.55 48%	1 5%	2.95 -181%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8	3.8 52%	1.8 77%	0.8 90%	1.6 80%	2.78 65%
Gamma	2.66 ^83%	2.36 ^93%	2.25 ^98%	2.22 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.5 ^88%
CCT	6636 ^98%	6922 ^94%	6574 ^99%	6381 ^102%	6482 ^100%	6879 ^94%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1% / 9%	22% / 18%	32% / 30%	15% / 16%	80% / 97%

* ... smaller is better

我们的测量结果证实了惠普宣称的完全 sRGB 覆盖范围。该显示器还能分别再现 73% 和 75% 的 DCI-P3 和 AdobeRGB 色域。

就校准而言，这款开箱即用的显示器状态很差。在 Calman ColorChecker 中，我们测得平均 Delta E 为 4.68，最大值在 11 左右徘徊。在手动校准屏幕后，我们将平均 Delta E 值降至近 1（最大值约为 1.7）。

灰度的情况也类似。最初的 8 级差异过高。我们的校准将 Delta E 降低到了该值的十分之一！您可以通过上面的链接免费下载我们校准过的 ICM 配置文件。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.6 ms rise
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.8 ms rise
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

550 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 550 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 550 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在禁用隐私滤镜后，可视角度问题是笔记本电脑在户外使用的唯一障碍。显示屏在其他方面也足够明亮，亚光表面可以消除大部分反光。你需要做的就是确保显示屏处于最佳角度。

启用 "确定视图 "功能后，最好待在室内。因为显示屏会变得非常暗，在室外几乎无法阅读屏幕内容。

如前所述，即使关闭隐私滤镜，可视角度也非常有限。当然，这也是有意为之，因为打开滤镜后，可视角度会受到极大限制。即使从一个很小的角度观看，你也几乎无法阅读屏幕上的任何内容。

不过，这一功能并不值得为它或滤镜叠加所带来的诸多弊端买单。尽管如此，下面的图片并不是很准确，让显示屏看起来比肉眼看到的更糟糕。看来，相机在通过滤光片捕捉光线方面仍然存在很大的问题。

性能 - 还是单通道内存

惠普为其精英商务笔记本电脑配备了 Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS集成了 Radeon 780M.该处理器配备 32 GB 内存和 1TB SSD。Sure View 隐私滤镜旨在保护屏幕在专业使用中不受窥探。智能卡插槽和众多安全功能也表明公司是该产品的目标受众。

此外，在显示屏、处理器、内存等方面还有许多配置选项。

测试条件

myHP 软件没有为 865 G10 提供任何性能配置文件。但惠普在 Windows 电源选项中创建了自己的 "惠普优化 "计划，默认情况下选择的是该计划。因此，我们在基准测试中也使用了该电源方案。

处理器

......（英文 Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS是 AMD Zen 4 处理器 Phoenix 系列中的顶级型号之一。它的 8 个内核运行频率为 4 至 5.2 GHz，由于采用了虚拟内核复制技术，最多可同时处理 16 个线程。AMD 还提供非专业版的 Ryzen 9 7940HS但 Pro 型号为企业提供了额外的管理和安全功能。此外，该 CPU 还拥有 Radeon 780M集成显卡，并首次配备了人工智能加速器。

此外，您还可以为 EliteBook 选择 Ryzen 3、5 或 7 CPU，这将影响笔记本内置的 iGPU。

在 30 分钟的 Cinebench R15 循环测试中，Ryzen 9 从一开始就表现出了非常稳定和高水平的性能。唯一能与之匹敌的竞争对手是 ThinkPad P16s G2仅配备了 Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.相比之下 Swift Edge虽然采用了相同的 Ryzen 7 处理器，但性能却比 ThinkPad 差很多。

开始运行时，TDP 大部分在 50 瓦左右，然后降至 40 瓦多一点。在电池供电情况下，没有出现任何初始峰值，TDP 保持在相当稳定的 40 至 43 瓦。因此，根据我们的计算，性能下降幅度很低，仅为 3%。

在平衡模式下，该设备的 TDP 表现和惠普优化模式下的结果相同。

在我们的 CPU 性能排名中，EliteBook 和 ThinkPad P16s 共同占据榜首。EliteBook 的 CPU 整体运行速度比 Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U 快约 39%。 Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U在前代产品.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained load

HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS: Ø2339 (2320.86-2356.27)

HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U: Ø1606 (1590.77-1665.14)

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U: Ø2317 (2288.98-2418.09)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1628 (1515.15-1985.51)

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø1170 (1070.41-1615.84)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P: Ø1457 (1291.45-1828.74)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	84.7 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	83.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	83.3 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	78.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 ^-2! Intel Core i5-1340P	70.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	67.9 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9 ^-2! AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	61.1 pt
Average of class Office	54.4 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (14919 - 16938, n=3)	15603 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	15142 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	14953 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	12032 (9372.55^min - 12032.4^max) Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	11181 Points -25%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	10047 Points -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	9777 Points -35%
Average of class Office (1056 - 15743, n=123, last 2 years)	8109 Points -46%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	1858 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1762 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	1719 Points -2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1719 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	1716 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (1568 - 1794, n=3)	1708 Points -3%
Average of class Office (529 - 1995, n=122, last 2 years)	1463 Points -17%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1409 Points -20%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (5790 - 6601, n=3)	6068 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	5981 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	5812 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	4740 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	4517 Points -22%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	3886 Points -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	3773 Points -35%
Average of class Office (356 - 5904, n=121, last 2 years)	3118 Points -46%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	713 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	689 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	671 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	668 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (611 - 695, n=3)	665 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	653 Points -5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	587 Points -15%
Average of class Office (181.3 - 764, n=121, last 2 years)	562 Points -18%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (2356 - 2718, n=3)	2478 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	2418 (2288.98^min - 2418.09^max) Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	2356 (2320.86^min - 2356.27^max) Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1986 (1515.15^min - 1985.51^max) Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	1828 Points -22%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1665 (1590.77^min - 1665.14^max) Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	1616 Points -31%
Average of class Office (160.8 - 2642, n=121, last 2 years)	1402 Points -40%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	275 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	268 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (247 - 280, n=3)	267 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	265 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	257 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	238 Points -13%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	232 Points -16%
Average of class Office (82.6 - 284, n=119, last 2 years)	218 Points -21%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Office (214 - 2844, n=122, last 2 years)	534 Seconds * -150%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	432 Seconds * -102%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	303 Seconds * -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	290 Seconds * -36%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	266 Seconds * -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	217 Seconds * -1%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	214 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (191 - 215, n=3)	207 Seconds * +3%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (61111 - 67813, n=3)	63409 MIPS +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	62320 MIPS +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	61111 MIPS
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	54022 MIPS -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	46027 MIPS -25%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	44011 MIPS -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	39989 MIPS -35%
Average of class Office (4226 - 62349, n=122, last 2 years)	34790 MIPS -43%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	6497 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (5844 - 6497, n=3)	6185 MIPS -5%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	6041 MIPS -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	5900 MIPS -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	5770 MIPS -11%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	5542 MIPS -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	5294 MIPS -19%
Average of class Office (2233 - 6687, n=122, last 2 years)	5028 MIPS -23%

Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	11820 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (10095 - 13028, n=3)	11157 Points +8%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	10763 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	10348 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	8482 Points -18%
Average of class Office (662 - 12171, n=42, last 2 years)	8438 Points -18%

Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	2614 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	2595 Points -1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2562 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (2339 - 2614, n=3)	2519 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	2455 Points -6%
Average of class Office (457 - 2646, n=41, last 2 years)	2164 Points -17%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	10907 Points +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (9897 - 12038, n=3)	10631 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	10439 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	9959 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	9516 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	7694 Points -23%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	7044 Points -29%
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=123, last 2 years)	6677 Points -33%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1969 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1933 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (1758 - 1969, n=3)	1894 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	1872 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	1749 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	1714 Points -13%
Average of class Office (510 - 1974, n=123, last 2 years)	1481 Points -25%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1433 Points -27%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (17 - 20.4, n=3)	18.2 fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	17.8 fps +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	17.3 fps
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	15.4 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	12.8 fps -26%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	11.7 fps -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	10.1 fps -42%
Average of class Office (1.55 - 17.4, n=121, last 2 years)	9.26 fps -46%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Office (31.3 - 117.5, n=121, last 2 years)	56.3 s * -2%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	55 s *
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	53.1 s * +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	52 s * +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (46.1 - 55, n=3)	50.5 s * +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	44.7 s * +19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	43.4 s * +21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	42 s * +24%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.397, n=120, last 2 years)	0.586 sec * -31%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	0.519 sec * -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	0.502 sec * -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U	0.4758 sec * -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	0.4658 sec * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (0.4462 - 0.4835, n=3)	0.4604 sec * -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	0.4593 sec * -3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	0.4462 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2356 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

146.5 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

275 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	95.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	92.4 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	91 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	73.6 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	59.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	59.9 pt
Average of class Office	45.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40.4 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (24034 - 27411, n=3)	25232 KRay/s +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	24034 KRay/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	23889 KRay/s -1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	17924 KRay/s -25%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	11668 KRay/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	8507 KRay/s -65%
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=121, last 2 years)	8354 KRay/s -65%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6833 KRay/s -72%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (101262 - 116960, n=3)	106817 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	102228 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	100087 Points -2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	78360 Points -23%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	73770 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	49719 Points -51%
Average of class Office (4027 - 102228, n=121, last 2 years)	44446 Points -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	36963 Points -64%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (4418 - 4944, n=3)	4601 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4442 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	4394 MB/s -1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	3519 MB/s -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	2552 MB/s -43%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	2475 MB/s -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1957 MB/s -56%
Average of class Office (279 - 4442, n=120, last 2 years)	1951 MB/s -56%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (112873 - 124565, n=3)	116818 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	112873 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	97790 Points -13%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	96417 Points -15%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	87176 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	80139 Points -29%
Average of class Office (8031 - 113016, n=121, last 2 years)	66926 Points -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65191 Points -42%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (14147 - 15304, n=3)	14580 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14288 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	14151 Points -1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	12063 Points -16%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	11123 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	6671 Points -53%
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=121, last 2 years)	6599 Points -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4666 Points -67%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (54003 - 62357, n=3)	56908 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	54365 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	53280 Points -2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	40720 Points -25%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	40693 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	24409 Points -55%
Average of class Office (2054 - 54365, n=121, last 2 years)	23379 Points -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	17970 Points -67%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	91493 MB/s +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	82707 MB/s +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (76133 - 88705, n=3)	81890 MB/s +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	80833 MB/s
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	54432 MB/s -33%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	50118 MB/s -38%
Average of class Office (5226 - 147611, n=121, last 2 years)	46831 MB/s -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38972 MB/s -52%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (976 - 1079, n=3)	1014 MB/s +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	1004 MB/s +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	976 MB/s
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	822 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	755 MB/s -23%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	655 MB/s -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	592 MB/s -39%
Average of class Office (67.6 - 1018, n=121, last 2 years)	535 MB/s -45%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (12715 - 14590, n=3)	13353 KRay/s +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	12715 KRay/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	12540 KRay/s -1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	9347 KRay/s -26%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	6091 KRay/s -52%
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=121, last 2 years)	4452 KRay/s -65%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	4204 KRay/s -67%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3560 KRay/s -72%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	45880 MPixel/s +89%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	37894 MPixel/s +56%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	31055 MPixel/s +28%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (24030 - 37800, n=3)	28713 MPixel/s +18%
Average of class Office (4814 - 48177, n=121, last 2 years)	24560 MPixel/s +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	24308 MPixel/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24269 MPixel/s 0%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	19707 MPixel/s -19%

系统性能

我们的评测机型仅在 PCMark 10 中获得第二名。这是因为 Acer Swift Edge 在 CPU 分数上落后 EliteBook 6% 之后，速度突然提高了 2%。尽管如此，我们系统的性能仍高于我们数据库中所有采用相同 CPU 的笔记本电脑的平均水平。大多数配备 Ryzen 9 CPU 的设备在 PCMark 的 Essentials 组中似乎都遇到了一些小问题。在 CrossMark 中，Swift 甚至比 EliteBook 领先 10%，尽管名义上它使用的是性能较弱的 Ryzen 7 处理器，而不是 Ryzen 9。

惠普EliteBook之所以未能夺得冠军宝座，原因似乎在于内存性能相当低迷。惠普只安装了一条内存，空出了另一个内存插槽。因此，内存以缓慢的单通道模式运行，这在 AIDA64 内存测试和 PCMark 中也有所体现。

PCMark 10 / Score
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	6952 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6825 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (6523 - 6825, n=2)	6674 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	6628 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	5873 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	5658 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	5576 Points -18%
Average of class Office (2325 - 7157, n=106, last 2 years)	5344 Points -22%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	10851 Points +9%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	10816 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	10598 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	10098 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9930 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9873 - 9930, n=2)	9902 Points 0%
Average of class Office (5095 - 20841, n=106, last 2 years)	9826 Points -1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	9289 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10198 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	10099 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9192 - 10198, n=2)	9695 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	8921 Points -13%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	8587 Points -16%
Average of class Office (3041 - 10198, n=106, last 2 years)	7440 Points -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	7105 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	6718 Points -34%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	8773 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	8518 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (8299 - 8518, n=2)	8409 Points -1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	8347 Points -2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	6894 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	6608 Points -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	6377 Points -25%
Average of class Office (1912 - 9056, n=106, last 2 years)	5804 Points -32%

CrossMark / Overall
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1804 Points +10%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1635 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1595 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	1593 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1579 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1423 - 1635, n=2)	1529 Points -6%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1329 Points -19%
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=107, last 2 years)	1325 Points -19%

CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1798 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	1625 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1620 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1547 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1532 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1400 - 1620, n=2)	1510 Points -7%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1373 Points -15%
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=107, last 2 years)	1340 Points -17%

CrossMark / Creativity
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1821 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1754 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1738 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1652 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1549 - 1754, n=2)	1652 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	1584 Points -10%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1363 Points -22%
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=107, last 2 years)	1362 Points -22%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1775 Points +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	1525 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1511 Points +11%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1362 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1353 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1161 - 1362, n=2)	1262 Points -7%
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=107, last 2 years)	1194 Points -12%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1118 Points -18%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	306 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	296 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (279 - 296, n=2)	288 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	271 Points -8%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	260 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	259 Points -12%
Average of class Office (99.2 - 368, n=108, last 2 years)	246 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	221 Points -25%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	252 Points
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	252 Points 0%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	250 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (229 - 252, n=3)	244 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	242 Points -4%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	211 Points -16%
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=96, last 2 years)	205 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	191.5 Points -24%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Office (479 - 1966, n=113, last 2 years)	728 ms * -37%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	614 ms * -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	562 ms * -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	559 ms * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M (532 - 564, n=2)	548 ms * -3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	532 ms *
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	522 ms * +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	521 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		6825 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	69103 MB/s +101%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	68255 MB/s +99%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	67037 MB/s +95%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (34339 - 66740, n=3)	45339 MB/s +32%
Average of class Office (7158 - 88119, n=122, last 2 years)	42889 MB/s +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	35017 MB/s +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	34339 MB/s
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	31003 MB/s -10%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	60597 MB/s +98%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	50376 MB/s +65%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	50373 MB/s +65%
Average of class Office (7325 - 87297, n=122, last 2 years)	43205 MB/s +41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38551 MB/s +26%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (30289 - 50398, n=3)	37088 MB/s +21%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	34682 MB/s +13%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	30576 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	91257 MB/s +129%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	89477 MB/s +124%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	88993 MB/s +123%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (39877 - 91516, n=3)	57187 MB/s +43%
Average of class Office (7579 - 94965, n=122, last 2 years)	46730 MB/s +17%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	39877 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	35910 MB/s -10%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	34532 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M	133.4 ns * -31%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	115.9 ns * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (102.2 - 121.3, n=3)	108.7 ns * -6%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	102.2 ns *
Average of class Office (44.3 - 188.3, n=123, last 2 years)	96.4 ns * +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	95.4 ns * +7%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	92 ns * +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	80.3 ns * +21%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的主页上打开浏览器或多个标签页时，LatencyMon 没有发现任何重大的延迟问题。不过，在以 4K/60fps 播放 YouTube 视频时，出现了 5 次丢帧现象，而且在随后运行 Prime95 的 10 秒钟过程中，延迟不幸增加到了 LatencyMon 认为可能存在问题的水平。

因此，惠普笔记本电脑在我们的对比组中排名居中，优于 ThinkPads（其延迟值非常高），但差于斯威夫特尤其是 Galaxy 笔记本(几乎没有任何问题）。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	2456.2 μs * -89%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1512 μs * -16%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1302.3 μs *
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	580.3 μs * +55%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	544.6 μs * +58%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	370.2 μs * +72%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

制造商再次安装了由 SK Hynix 制造的 1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD。这款存储硬盘目前在我们的固态硬盘排名中占据第三位，这意味着它可能是市场上速度最快的型号之一。

尽管如此，这款固态硬盘并没有为 EliteBook 带来卓越的性能，而是比其潜能低了约 25%。

4K 传输速度相对较低，影响了整体评价。

相比之下，持续顺序读取和写入速度则非常出色和稳定--我们没有遇到任何节流现象。SK Hynix 硬盘在这方面超越了竞争对手。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6908 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5893 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 453 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 544 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 85.9 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 396 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1130 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	84.6 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	84.2 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	68.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	67.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	62.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	54.9 pt
Average of class Office	52.4 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	40.1 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	4315 (4249.57^min - 4315.1^max) MB/s +13%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3823 (3779.48^min - 3823.32^max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2511 - 5665, n=16)	3732 MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	2924 (2891.55^min - 2924.29^max) MB/s -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	2656 (2441.44^min - 2656.04^max) MB/s -31%
Average of class Office (482 - 4554, n=108, last 2 years)	2471 MB/s -35%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1772 (1755.11^min - 1771.67^max) MB/s -54%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1639 (1605.72^min - 1638.79^max) MB/s -57%
seq write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (1690 - 5181, n=16)	3849 MB/s +8%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3554 (3431.84^min - 3553.62^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	3534 (3429.26^min - 3534.33^max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	2840 (2803.32^min - 2839.98^max) MB/s -20%
Average of class Office (333 - 5842, n=108, last 2 years)	2375 MB/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1633 (1589.22^min - 1633.47^max) MB/s -54%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1535 (1503.59^min - 1535.32^max) MB/s -57%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1505 (1276.71^min - 1504.84^max) MB/s -58%
seq q8 t1 read
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6912 (6199.99^min - 6911.79^max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (6508 - 7177, n=16)	6900 MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	6832 (5516.98^min - 6832.31^max) MB/s -1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	6418 (5867.84^min - 6417.66^max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Office (535 - 7120, n=108, last 2 years)	4017 MB/s -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	3945 (2427.42^min - 3944.82^max) MB/s -43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	3593 (3221.44^min - 3593.26^max) MB/s -48%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2741 (2448.63^min - 2741.4^max) MB/s -60%
seq q8 t1 write
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6109 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	6044 (6015.89^min - 6043.71^max) MB/s -1%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2382 - 6149, n=16)	5647 MB/s -8%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	4927 (1087.79^min - 4927.05^max) MB/s -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	3166 (3057.2^min - 3166.45^max) MB/s -48%
Average of class Office (276 - 6791, n=108, last 2 years)	3022 MB/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1821 (1636.07^min - 1820.67^max) MB/s -70%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1606 (1595.72^min - 1606.21^max) MB/s -74%
4k q1 t1 read
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	74.3 (62.98^min - 74.29^max) MB/s +23%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (54.3 - 85, n=16)	69.5 MB/s +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	68.6 (67.39^min - 68.63^max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	61.4 (59.78^min - 61.38^max) MB/s +1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	60.7 (60.49^min - 60.66^max) MB/s 0%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	60.5 MB/s
Average of class Office (17.7 - 89.9, n=108, last 2 years)	57.7 MB/s -5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	44.5 (43.91^min - 44.49^max) MB/s -26%
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	279 (266.75^min - 279.17^max) MB/s +103%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	255 (245.86^min - 255.23^max) MB/s +86%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	246 (239.52^min - 246.23^max) MB/s +79%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (77.7 - 335, n=16)	200 MB/s +46%
Average of class Office (32 - 429, n=108, last 2 years)	161.2 MB/s +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	154.3 (148.14^min - 154.33^max) MB/s +12%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	137.4 (136.17^min - 137.39^max) MB/s
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	118 (117.43^min - 118.03^max) MB/s -14%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2923 (2892.49^min - 2922.92^max) MB/s +191%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (353 - 5829, n=16)	2259 MB/s +125%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	1689 (1678.65^min - 1689.23^max) MB/s +68%
Average of class Office (184.2 - 4425, n=108, last 2 years)	1276 MB/s +27%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1005 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1000 (980.97^min - 999.75^max) MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	994 (942.37^min - 993.94^max) MB/s -1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	814 (780.65^min - 814.02^max) MB/s -19%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	1885 (1857.53^min - 1885.09^max) MB/s +311%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1392 (1180.35^min - 1391.84^max) MB/s +203%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1380 (1115.15^min - 1380.3^max) MB/s +201%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (148.5 - 3719, n=16)	1318 MB/s +187%
Average of class Office (192.2 - 3254, n=108, last 2 years)	938 MB/s +104%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	462 (369.87^min - 462.23^max) MB/s +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	459 (404.81^min - 458.8^max) MB/s
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	361 (319.39^min - 361.16^max) MB/s -21%

AS SSD
Score Total
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	7463 Points +32%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (4390 - 10562, n=15)	7122 Points +26%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5674 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	5604 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	5013 Points -12%
Average of class Office (704 - 9204, n=104, last 2 years)	3983 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	3704 Points -35%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2805 Points -51%
Score Read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2901 Points +97%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (953 - 3793, n=15)	2109 Points +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	1842 Points +25%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1470 Points
Average of class Office (252 - 3364, n=104, last 2 years)	1442 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1263 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1162 Points -21%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1053 Points -28%
Score Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2690 - 5157, n=15)	3990 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	3969 Points +14%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3478 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	3132 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	2232 Points -36%
Average of class Office (320 - 4111, n=104, last 2 years)	1846 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1841 Points -47%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1271 Points -63%
Seq Read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	5796.32 MB/s +65%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (3522 - 5892, n=15)	5256 MB/s +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	4618 MB/s +31%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3522 MB/s
Average of class Office (508 - 5796, n=104, last 2 years)	3162 MB/s -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	3033.04 MB/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	2986.81 MB/s -15%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2485 MB/s -29%
Seq Write
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	4720.45 MB/s +70%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2489 - 5880, n=15)	3971 MB/s +43%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2772 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	2761.94 MB/s 0%
Average of class Office (304 - 5880, n=104, last 2 years)	2080 MB/s -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1972 MB/s -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1617.55 MB/s -42%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1119 MB/s -60%
4K Read
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	74.26 MB/s +29%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	66.45 MB/s +16%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (56 - 79.4, n=15)	65.7 MB/s +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	62.01 MB/s +8%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	57.5 MB/s
Average of class Office (18.7 - 91.1, n=104, last 2 years)	56.3 MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	50.4 MB/s -12%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	43.99 MB/s -23%
4K Write
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	230.09 MB/s +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	222.03 MB/s +54%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (144.4 - 286, n=15)	219 MB/s +52%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	215.44 MB/s +49%
Average of class Office (35.4 - 350, n=104, last 2 years)	158.7 MB/s +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	145.8 MB/s +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	144.4 MB/s
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	117.89 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2255.03 MB/s +113%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (359 - 3131, n=15)	1518 MB/s +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	1477.05 MB/s +39%
Average of class Office (182.3 - 2713, n=104, last 2 years)	1069 MB/s +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1060 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	889.77 MB/s -16%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	760.82 MB/s -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	649 MB/s -39%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	3626 MB/s +19%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2206 - 4381, n=15)	3374 MB/s +10%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3056 MB/s
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2430.22 MB/s -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	1733.65 MB/s -43%
Average of class Office (132.3 - 3394, n=104, last 2 years)	1479 MB/s -52%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1463.63 MB/s -52%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1041.52 MB/s -66%
Access Time Read
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	0.103 ms * -140%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	0.084 ms * -95%
Average of class Office (0.022 - 0.295, n=104, last 2 years)	0.07963 ms * -85%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	0.053 ms * -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	0.05 ms * -16%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	0.049 ms * -14%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.043 ms *
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (0.03 - 0.062, n=15)	0.03867 ms * +10%
Access Time Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	0.102 ms * -292%
Average of class Office (0.017 - 0.619, n=104, last 2 years)	0.06404 ms * -146%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	0.053 ms * -104%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (0.017 - 0.069, n=15)	0.03433 ms * -32%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	0.033 ms * -27%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.026 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	0.021 ms * +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	0.019 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP EliteBook 865 G10 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6918 (6258.74-6957.44)

HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU: Ø2705 (2435-2725.25)

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6747 (5503.14-6796.62)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N: Ø4968 (3485.83-6480.79)

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ: Ø3573 (3295.17-3582.56)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G: Ø3951 (3430.73-3970.54)

图形卡

图形处理由集成的 AMD Radeon 780M是目前最强大的 iGPU 之一。不用说，它的性能在很大程度上取决于 CPU 的时钟速度。

遗憾的是，EliteBook 的 3D 加速器比其他笔记本电脑的相同 GPU 平均性能要差 50%，至少在 3DMark 测试中是如此。单通道内存可能也是问题的一部分。

G10 只比上一代产品快 15%，而 Swift 和 ThinkPad P16 则分别比 G10 快 46% 和 67%！尽管 EliteBook 在商务环境中可能不需要经常处理 3D 任务，但这些结果还是非常令人失望。尽管安装了 HIP SDK，但 Blender Classroom HIP/AMD 测试始终无法运行。

无论如何，当笔记本使用电池供电时，图形性能不会进一步下降。我们在新的Fire Strike 运行中测得性能下降了约 15%。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	100 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M	94.2 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U ^-1! AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	87.4 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	59.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	53.4 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	52 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	50.4 pt
Average of class Office	49.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	12885 Points +61%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (7868 - 13932, n=35)	12196 Points +53%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	11636 Points +46%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	7982 Points
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	6969 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	6349 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	6225 Points -22%
Average of class Office (1474 - 13132, n=114, last 2 years)	6054 Points -24%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	48097 Points +60%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (27771 - 50924, n=15)	45229 Points +51%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	29972 Points
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	26475 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	26239 Points -12%
Average of class Office (5681 - 58068, n=93, last 2 years)	24010 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	18764 Points -37%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	8142 Points +72%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (4550 - 8538, n=34)	7595 Points +61%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	7156 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	5127 Points +9%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	4722 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	4688 Points -1%
Average of class Office (712 - 9228, n=115, last 2 years)	4188 Points -11%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	4015 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	2813 Points +74%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (1496 - 3027, n=34)	2667 Points +65%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2363 Points +46%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1615 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	1471 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	1445 Points -11%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1399 Points -13%
Average of class Office (242 - 3242, n=111, last 2 years)	1370 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance		7807 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		26396 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		4410 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1838 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average of class Office (322 - 1215, n=18, last 2 years)	739 Seconds *
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	555 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Office (343 - 3786, n=110, last 2 years)	910 Seconds * -165%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	780 Seconds * -127%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	559 Seconds * -63%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	516 Seconds * -50%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	460 Seconds * -34%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (305 - 503, n=33)	376 Seconds * -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U	354 Seconds * -3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	343 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在 3DMark 中观察到的趋势延续到了我们的游戏测试中。采用 Ryzen 7 和相同的 780M iGPU、功能强大且更厚实的 ThinkPad P16s 性能比 EliteBook 高出 60%；宏碁 Swift Edge 则领先 36%。老款和新款 EliteBook 之间的差距只有区区 9% 。

实际上，惠普 EliteBook 865 G10 最多只能运行较老或要求不高的游戏，即使如此，也可能是在降低质量设置的情况下。更依赖 CPU 的游戏（如《DOTA 2 Reborn》）运行得更好，而所有 GPU 密集型游戏只能在低于全高清和中低设置下流畅运行。

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	96.4 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	81.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE ^-1! Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	65.2 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	62.6 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	57.6 pt
Average of class Office	56.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 ^-1! Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	54.5 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	30 fps +67%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	20.4 (18^min) fps +13%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	14.4 (12^min) fps -20%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	14.3 (12^min, 13^P1) fps -21%
Average of class Office (2.66 - 34, n=111, last 2 years)	13.7 fps -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	13.5 (11^min) fps -25%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	27.3 (2.88^min, 18.5^P1) fps +118%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	21 (3.16^min, 14.5^P1) fps +68%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	12.5 (2.74^min, 8.47^P1) fps
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=91, last 2 years)	11.6 fps -7%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	11.3 (1.23^min, 7.87^P1) fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	10.2 (0.768^min, 6.33^P1) fps -18%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	25.2 fps +57%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	21.2 fps +32%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	16.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	15.5 fps -4%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	14.8 fps -8%
Average of class Office (2.03 - 35.7, n=103, last 2 years)	14.4 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	13.3 fps -17%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	46.9 (29.8^min, 35.7^P1) fps +100%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	41.3 (7.5^min, 9.37^P1) fps +76%
Average of class Office (6.6 - 56.5, n=97, last 2 years)	23.9 fps +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	23.5 (6^min, 7.08^P1) fps
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	22 (14^min, 15.9^P1) fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22 (5^min, 6.32^P1) fps -6%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	69.5 (59.8^min) fps +35%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	61.4 (52^min) fps +20%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	51.3 (44.7^min) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	50.3 (8.7^min) fps -2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	48 (42.4^min) fps -6%
Average of class Office (7.8 - 121.2, n=124, last 2 years)	46.3 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	44.9 (40^min) fps -12%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	35.9 fps +22%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	30.3 fps +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.5 fps
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	29.3 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	28.4 fps -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	28.1 fps -5%
Average of class Office (5.55 - 92.6, n=124, last 2 years)	28.2 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	25.1 fps -15%

在超高设置下进行的一小时Witcher 3 测试中，帧速率随游戏中通常的昼夜循环而变化。除此之外，帧率基本保持不变，偶尔会出现非常短暂的下降。

在测试过程中，SoC 的温度升至 80 至 87°C（176 至 188.6°F）之间，平均功耗约为 41 瓦，其中很大一部分分配给了 iGPU。GPU 的主频约为 2.7GHz，而 CPU 内核的主频则低得多。

Witcher 3 FPS chart

HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M: Ø19.5 (15-22)

HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M: Ø14.3 (12-16)

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M: Ø28.7 (26-33)

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø13.6 (12-15)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Ø14 (11-16)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	98.8		32.7	12.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	74.4	47.7	21.3	18
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	127.1	96.6	56	51.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	41.1	21.1	16.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	48	35.7	29.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)	42	22	21	21
Strange Brigade (2018)	77.8	31.7	27.3	23.5
F1 23 (2023)	42.4	38.1	28.4	7.63	6.91

排放 - 相对安静，但在负载情况下会发热

噪音排放

在空闲状态下，EliteBook 的单风扇大部分时间都处于不活动状态。在 3DMark06 中，风扇在大约 20 秒后开始转动，但保持相对安静，仅次于 ThinkPad T16 G2。 ThinkPad T16 G2在这种情况下也同样安静。

EliteBook 在游戏或重载时声音也会变大。大多数竞争对手的风扇噪音都比较大，但其中一些也有更好的（3D）性能，例如 Swift Edge和 ThinkPad P16s.只有超薄的 Galaxy Book3 Pro 16尽管性能较弱，但音量要大得多。

在游戏过程中，风扇有轻微脉动的倾向，即旋转速度不太稳定。

Noise Level

Idle		23 / 23 / 23 dB(A)
Load		29.17 / 39.46 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A)

	HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
Noise		6%	-4%	-12%	-3%	-22%
off / environment *	23	23 -0%	22.6 2%	23.4 -2%	24 -4%	25.2 -10%
Idle Minimum *	23	23 -0%	22.6 2%	24.1 -5%	24 -4%	25.2 -10%
Idle Average *	23	23 -0%	22.6 2%	24.3 -6%	24 -4%	25.2 -10%
Idle Maximum *	23	23 -0%	22.6 2%	28 -22%	26.8 -17%	29.3 -27%
Load Average *	29.17	29.1 -0%	37.8 -30%	41 -41%	26.8 8%	46.4 -59%
Witcher 3 ultra *	38.91	29.1 25%	40.3 -4%	40.9 -5%	38.9 -0%
Load Maximum *	39.46	32.9 17%	40.5 -3%	40.9 -4%	38.6 2%	46.4 -18%

* ... smaller is better

温度

惠普笔记本电脑的热量分布不是很理想。风扇略微偏向机身中央的右侧，因此这一侧特别凉爽。而机箱的另一侧和中间则在重负荷下变得格外热。

不仅在压力测试中，而且在游戏过程中，我们都在底部发现了 50°C （122°F）的热点。在这种不常见的负载情况下，EliteBook 已不再适合在膝上使用。竞争对手通常可以在负载情况下保持较低的温度。尽管如此，在正常的办公环境下，温度应该不成问题。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


45 °C	45 °C	37 °C
43 °C	44 °C	34 °C
32 °C	28 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 37.1 °C


36 °C	50 °C	49 °C
27 °C	38 °C	40 °C
25 °C	29 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 36 °C

Power Supply (max.) 53 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


30 °C	30 °C	28 °C
28 °C	29 °C	25 °C
26 °C	24 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 27 °C


29 °C	34 °C	32 °C
26 °C	28 °C	29 °C
24 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 28 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42 °C	44 °C	38 °C
42 °C	42 °C	31 °C
31 °C	27 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 35.9 °C


34 °C	50 °C	49 °C
27 °C	37 °C	40 °C
26 °C	30 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 36 °C

Power Supply (max.) 52 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-4.3 °C / -7.7 F).

	HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Heat		17%	9%	6%	12%	4%
Maximum Upper Side *	45	39.4 12%	42.7 5%	41.6 8%	40.5 10%	41.6 8%
Maximum Bottom *	50	47.6 5%	47.2 6%	46.6 7%	42.7 15%	45 10%
Idle Upper Side *	30	23.6 21%	27.8 7%	30.4 -1%	28.2 6%	31 -3%
Idle Bottom *	34	24.1 29%	28.4 16%	31 9%	28 18%	33.6 1%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

我们的压力测试包括同时运行 Prime95 和 FurMark 一个小时。测试期间，CPU 内核的运行频率曾短暂达到 4.7 GHz，功耗为 51 瓦。随后，时钟频率和功耗分别下降并稳定在 4.1 GHz 和 41 瓦左右。SoC 发热约 81°C（177.8°F）。

iGPU 运行频率为 2.5 GHz，稍后稳定在 2.1 GHz。

	CPU 时钟 (GHz)	GPU 时钟 (MHz)	SoC 平均温度 (°C)
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	4.1	2,100	81
Witcher 3 压力	0.220	2,700	80

发言人

EliteBook 上的立体声扬声器是向下发射的，而且不是位于正面，而是位于两侧的中间。这明显没有我们习惯的直达效果好。因此，我们将声级麦克风放在距离笔记本前缘 15 厘米（5.9 英寸）处，测得的输出电平很低。扬声器对我们的耳朵来说也太安静了。

至少它们能发出平衡的中高音，但明显缺乏低音。

有一个 3.5 毫米组合音频插孔，可用于连接模拟播放设备。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP EliteBook 865 G10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 尽管用电量过高，但仍能保持良好的续航能力

耗电量

在空闲状态下，新款 EliteBook 的耗电量几乎与前代产品相同。而在最大亮度和启用无线模块的情况下，其耗电量仍然有些过高。

与竞争对手相比，这款笔记本在负载情况下的耗电量同样过高。即使是性能更好的联想 ThinkPad P16s G2的耗电量也略低于 EliteBook。理论上非常明亮的显示屏似乎损耗了不少电量。另一方面，ThinkPad P16s 必须驱动 4K OLED 屏幕。

我们测得的瞬态功率峰值高达 101 瓦。这意味着小巧的 110 瓦 USB-C 充电器（约 13.5 x 6 厘米，或 5.3 x 2.4 英寸）为笔记本供电应该不成问题。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.13 / 0.13 Watt
Idle	5.2 / 12.8 / 14.1 Watt
Load	65 / 101.44 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00	Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00	Average AMD Radeon 780M	Average of class Office
Power Consumption		16%	23%	12%	45%	37%	15%	35%
Idle Minimum *	5.2	5.3 -2%	6.1 -17%	7.1 -37%	3.1 40%	3.9 25%	6.37 ?(2.7 - 14, n=28) -23%	4.3 ?(2.2 - 9.6, n=108, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Average *	12.8	12.8 -0%	6.5 49%	10.1 21%	6.4 50%	4.8 62%	8.59 ?(4.8 - 17.6, n=28) 33%	7.34 ?(3.8 - 20.6, n=108, last 2 years) 43%
Idle Maximum *	14.1	14.1 -0%	7 50%	18.6 -32%	6.8 52%	10 29%	11.3 ?(5.4 - 27, n=28) 20%	9.13 ?(5.1 - 23.9, n=108, last 2 years) 35%
Load Average *	65	48.5 25%	56.6 13%	45.3 30%	29.3 55%	44 32%	52.8 ?(19.7 - 75.3, n=28) 19%	41 ?(8.7 - 77.9, n=107, last 2 years) 37%
Witcher 3 ultra *	68.2	48.7 29%	61.2 10%	39.5 42%	41.5 39%	42.3 38%
Load Maximum *	101.44	56.6 44%	68.3 33%	52.9 48%	64.6 36%	63 38%	73.6 ?(46.6 - 111.8, n=28) 27%	58 ?(11.1 - 101.4, n=108, last 2 years) 43%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø68.2 (61.01-75.33)

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø61.2 (59.9-64.3)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø39.5 (35.7-44.9)

HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø82.9 (68.65-101.44)

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø66.1 (65.1-68.4)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø41 (33.2-52.9)

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.1 (6.8-8.52)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.63 (7.15-10.3)

Power consumption with external monitor

HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø61.4 (59.294-75.11)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø42.9 (37.7-50.3)

HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø63.1 (56.601-71.8)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø37.7 (36.3-39.4)

HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø57.7 (55.511-72.05)

HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø57.7 (51.246-60.538)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø41.5 (36.1-49.7)

HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø59.8 (58.105-67.05)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø34 (32-36.9)

HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.33 (0.00179-5.7521)

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.18 (6.63-8.66)

电池寿命

与前代机型一样，惠普为当前的 EliteBook 865 配备了容量为 76 Wh 的电池。尽管在负载情况下耗电量很高，但在要求不高的任务（如网页浏览和视频流）中，这款笔记本电脑仍能提供出色的电池续航时间。

同时，我们注意到显示屏的耗电量似乎特别高。在最大亮度下，惠普笔记本电脑的续航时间只有屏幕亮度降低到 150 尼特时的一半（7.5 小时而不是 15.5 小时）。但总的来说，电池续航时间还是很不错的。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		15h 24min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		7h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 26min

	HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 76 Wh	HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 76 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh	Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52.5 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 76 Wh	Average of class Office
Battery Runtime		18%	-10%	-64%	17%	2%	-5%
H.264	839	1112 33%	797 -5%		824 -2%	861 3%	705 ?(348 - 1112, n=40, last 2 years) -16%
WiFi v1.3	924	899 -3%	635 -31%	336 -64%	690 -25%	613 -34%	592 ?(300 - 1137, n=108, last 2 years) -36%
Load	86	106 23%	92 7%		154 79%	119 38%	117.7 ?(56 - 218, n=67, last 2 years) 37%
Reader / Idle					1169	1821	1436 ?(527 - 2359, n=21, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 金属机箱

+ 支持 LTE 和智能卡

+ 500 万像素网络摄像头

+ 良好的输入设备

+ 多种管理和安全功能

+ 出色的 CPU 性能

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 网络摄像头存在严重的色彩准确性问题，曝光过度

- 单通道内存

- 显示屏受 Sure View 隐私屏影响

- 刷新率只有 60Hz

- 3D 性能差

- 负载情况下功耗较高

评语--《精英》还需打磨，惠普还有很多工作要做！

惠普 EliteBook 865 G10 有很多优点，尤其是在制造质量和规格方面。其坚固的金属机身和出色的输入设备同样引人注目。这款笔记本还配备了 LTE SIM 卡插槽、智能卡读卡器和一系列安全功能。那么，它是商务人士的理想笔记本电脑吗？

很遗憾，不是。总体而言，我们对这款设备的失望多于赞叹。前代机型肯定有其缺陷，但遗憾的是，惠普并没有对这款笔记本电脑进行任何优化和改进。在我们看来，Sure View 仍然是祸而不是福；性能仍然受到单通道内存配置的阻碍，尽管这很容易解决。惠普应该受到批评，因为除了更新 CPU 之外，它实际上什么也没做。客户应该对制造商的 Elite 系列产品抱有更高的期望。尤其是 Sure View 隐私过滤器急需重新设计。这款笔记本电脑甚至还带来了新的问题，如功耗过高（尤其是在负载情况下）。

尽管如此，EliteBook 仍可进行多种配置。如果你选择 400 nit 显示屏和双通道模式下的两个内存条，你还是会得到一台性能卓越的商务笔记本电脑。不过，我们的工作仍然是评估我们的评测配置--在这种情况下并不容易。

如果配置得当，惠普EliteBook 865 G10可以成为一款出色的商务笔记本电脑。但是，恼人的 Sure View 过滤器和影响性能的单通道内存让我们的评测机型无法获得更高的评价。

如果你想要一台功能强大的惠普笔记本电脑，并且可以不支持 LTE 和智能卡，那么你应该考虑功能非常全面的 HP Spectre x360 16我们最近对其进行了评测。否则之前的 EliteBook G9仍然值得一试，不过在可能的情况下，同样应该避免使用 Sure View。

价格和供应情况

目前，Ryzen 9 版本的 EliteBook 865 G10 尚未在惠普美国商店上架。但您可以在找到各种 Ryzen 5 和 7 版本，价格从 1250 美元起。.带触摸屏的 Ryzen 5 机型目前在亚马逊上的售价约为 1,550 美元。

HP EliteBook 865 G10 - 2024-02-29 02/29/2024 v7
Christian Hintze

Chassis

88 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard

91%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

0 / 80 → 0%

Weight

64 / 20-75 → 81%

Battery

90%

Display

66%

Games Performance

65 / 78 → 83%

Application Performance

95 / 95 → 100%

Temperature

86%

Noise

96%

Audio

69%

Camera

39 / 85 → 46%

Average

79%

86%

Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 150 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普EliteBook 865 G10笔记本电脑评测--被Sure View毁掉的高性能商务笔记本电脑

Christian Hintze, 2024-03- 8 (Update: 2024-03- 8)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	2354
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	2355
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2355.57
HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	2356
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	2360
Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD R7 PRO 7840HS, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU	2361
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores	2362
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores	7756
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7781
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	7794
HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	7807
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7865
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	7872
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7882
...
(max) R7 7800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	72163

惠普EliteBook 865 G10笔记本电脑评测--被Sure View毁掉的高性能商务笔记本电脑

潜在的竞争对手比较

机箱 - EliteBook 16，银色金属机箱

尺寸比较

规格 - 智能卡和 LTE，但没有局域网或 SD 读卡器

连接性

网络摄像头

安全

配件和保修

升级和维护

输入设备 - 舒适安静地打字和点击

键盘

触摸板

显示屏 - 确定视图尚未改进

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 还是单通道内存

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained load

系统性能

DPC 延迟

大容量存储器

Sustained load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS chart

排放 - 相对安静，但在负载情况下会发热

噪音排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

HP EliteBook 865 G10 audio analysis

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U audio analysis

电源管理 - 尽管用电量过高，但仍能保持良好的续航能力

耗电量

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语--《精英》还需打磨，惠普还有很多工作要做！

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare