Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarAcemagic AM18 评测：采用抢眼赛博朋克外观的游戏迷你 PC，配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 和 32 GB 内存
Acemagic 的产品组合包括 AM18，这是一款非常引人注目的机型，并非主要用于办公用途。在硬件方面，我们可以看到 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS是 AMD 的一款知名 SoC。制造商没有采用专用显卡，而是使用了 AMD Radeon 780M，该显卡目前被认为是令人信服的 iGPU。关于 iGPU 在我们测试样本中的表现，稍后会有更多介绍。现代的连接方式还允许使用外置显卡，我们也进行了测试。这款价值 659 欧元的设备的其他功能包括 32 GB DDR5 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘。制造商目前没有列出其他处理器或不同内存配置的替代配置。不过，在亚马逊上可以找到其他配置。Acemagic AM18 目前有售，存储空间更大，售价为679 欧元，而我们的测试配置售价为649 欧元。
下表显示了本次评测中 Acemagic AM18 的竞争对手。
Acemagic AM18
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 780M, Adrenalin 24.2.1
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-5600, Quad-Channel
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe, 512 GB
, 450 GB free
Weight
600 g, Power Supply: 295 g
Price
659 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Memory | Weight | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.3 % | 04/2024 | Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 600 g | 58 mm |
| 87.3 % | 12/2023 | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 750 g | 52.3 mm |
| 85.1 % | 03/2024 | Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 238 g | 43 mm |
| 83.4 % | 04/2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 32768 MB | 768 g | 57 mm |
| 82.8 % | 07/2023 | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | 32768 MB | 753 g | 58 mm |
| 82 % | 06/2023 | ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | 32768 MB | 874 g | 188.5 mm |
| 81.9 % | 02/2024 | Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 16384 MB | 603 g | 58 mm |
| 79.5 % | 02/2024 | Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 16384 MB | 601 g | 52 mm |
配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 的 Acemagic AM18 详细介绍
外壳 - 带有 RGB 灯光的塑料布景
从外观上看，Acemagic AM18 会让人联想到 Aoostar GOD77.这也难怪，因为两者的外壳相同，只是品牌不同而已。因此，两者也有相同的优点和缺点。主要使用塑料并没有错，但在某些地方确实显得有些廉价。总的来说，AM18 是坚固的，尽管底部有些地方有些松动。从外观上看，这款迷你电脑的照明风扇非常引人注目。通过正面的一个小按钮就可以改变颜色；控制照明不需要额外的软件。不过，如果你不喜欢 RGB 灯光，也可以将其完全关闭。
在空间要求方面，Acemagic AM18 和 Aoostar GOD77 稍微大一些。在重量方面，我们注意到设备本身重 600 克，电源装置重 295 克。Acemagic 还可以直接安装在显示器上。附带有相应的安装支架。
设备 - 配备 USB4 的精选设备
外部连接位于前部和后部。可供选择的接口令人满意。它有许多 USB 端口，Acemagic 还在前面安装了一个 USB4 端口，从而扩大了应用范围。AM8 总共可以同时控制三个屏幕，尽管许多其他设备也能做到这一点。不过，需要强调的是，144 Hz 的 4K 也是可以实现的。这使得 Acemagic AM18 有别于许多其他微型电脑。
该设备还预装了 Windows 操作系统。在了解到设备被恶意软件感染的事件后，我们对测试设备进行了仔细检查，但未发现任何异常。为了安全起见，建议在购买后重新安装。
交流
内置的 Wi-Fi 模块来自 Realtek，但性能并不出众。由于其性能不佳，我们的测试样品只能排在最后一位。华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 被用作测试路由器。值得一提的是，内置的无线模块只能使用 2.4GHz 和 5GHz 频率。不过，如果你需要更快的无线连接速度，可以更换 WLAN 模块。来自 Aoostar 的同款设备展示了这一可能性。此外，Acemagic 还提供两个 LAN 端口，速度可达 2.5 GBit/s。
Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø448 (221-519)
Aoostar GOD77 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1404 (1258-1446)
Maxtang MTN-FP750 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø851 (802-903)
Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø654 (343-743)
Aoostar GOD77 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1390 (696-1494)
Maxtang MTN-FP750 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (743-896)
交付范围
除设备本身外，还包括 100 瓦电源装置、HDMI 电缆和电源线。此外，还包括用于 2.5 英寸大容量存储设备的连接线和 VESA 支架。
维护
由于 Acemagic 没有提供 AM18 的裸机版本，因此不一定要打开设备才能安装内存和固态硬盘。不过，只需卸下底盖即可。螺丝隐藏在胶粘的橡胶脚垫下，这对用户并不友好。撕下后，有可能无法正常粘合。与此同时，我们已经看到许多其他设备提供了很好的替代解决方案。拧下四颗螺丝后，底板就可以轻松取下。这样就可以接触到内存和固态硬盘，并在必要时进行更换。不过，Acemagic AM18 只能使用 2.5 英寸大容量存储设备进行扩展。要做到这一点，必须拆下底部的小风扇。
而位于顶部的 CPU 风扇则更容易拆卸。您只需拧下机箱顶部的四颗银色螺丝，即可取下盖子。
性能 - AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS，配备 8 个 Zen4 内核
餈 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS采用 Zen 4 架构，拥有 8 个内核和 16 个线程，性能稳定。凭借 AMD Radeon 780M，该系统芯片还配备了强大的 iGPU，现代掌上游戏 PC 也越来越多地使用 iGPU。因此，从预期用途来看，处理器的选择是明智的。
测试条件
所有性能测试均在平衡
能耗模式下进行。我们没有更改有关 SoC 功耗的限制，而是根据 BIOS 设置将其保留在出厂设置中。其他节能方案仅用于能耗测量，噪音测量则根据我们的 测试标准.
处理器
ARyzen 7 7840HS是一款经济型 8 核处理器，在 Acemagic AM18 中的运行功耗高达 54 瓦。在长时间负载情况下，它的功耗仍可达到 45 瓦。在与 Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX 的直接对决中，我们的测试样品仅以微弱劣势落败。两款机型配备了相同的 SoC，但 Minisforum 机型的散热效果似乎略胜一筹。在 AIDA64 测试中，搭载 Ryzen 7 7840HS 的两款机型明显有别于其他竞争对手。不过，对于我们的测试样本来说，这也仅够获得第二名。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.
Performance Rating | Cinebench 2024 | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Blender | wPrime 2.10 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | WinRAR | TrueCrypt | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 5.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | 3DMark 11 | 7-Zip 18.03 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | R Benchmark 2.5 | LibreOffice | WebXPRT 3 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | 3DMark
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| WinRAR - Result | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Acemagic AM18 与 Cinebench R15 多环对比
Cinebench R15 连续循环模拟了经常性的连续负载，让我们第一次看到了内置冷却装置的性能。从数据中可以看出，功耗严格限制在 54 瓦以内，但平均功耗略低于 42 瓦。AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 的温度为 85.5 °C，并未达到临界温度范围。在测试过程中，我们仅在开始时发现性能略有下降。
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2489 (2476.93-2539.84)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2605 (2564.1-2649.53)
Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1896 (1886.17-1902.5)
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø1878 (1825.15-2068.58)
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2050 (2014.91-2082.68)
Aoostar GOD77 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2035 (2000.9-2103.82)
Maxtang MTN-FP750 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø1772 (1721.99-1800.59)
系统性能
Acemagic AM18 在所有系统性能测试中均表现出色。不过，所有设备在日常使用中的表现都相当不错，没有明显差异。不过，与已配备英特尔流星湖处理器的 Acemagic F2A 的比较非常有趣。在这一对比中，英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H 无法追上 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS。
我们的测试设备在内存测试中也获得了第一名。Acemagic 为 AM18 配备了 5600 MT/s 的 DDR5 内存。
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
基本上，Acemagic AM18 在 DPC 延迟方面表现不俗。与对比设备相比，我们在测试样本中看到了最低的延迟。不过，我们只是在启动 Prime95 后才达到此处记录的最大值。在播放 4K 测试视频和使用 Edge 浏览器冲浪时，延迟略低。我们还记录了视频播放过程中的一些丢帧现象，这些现象不仅发生在视频开始时。不过，由于帧数较少，播放时没有出现问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Acemagic 为我们提供的测试样品是来自 Rayson 的 512 GB SSD。在测试中，该固态硬盘性能稳定，足以满足大多数用户的需求。在测试中，安装的型号没有出现任何问题。不过，我们记录了相对较高的温度，但这并没有导致传输速率下降。该设备本身还可容纳额外的 2.5 英寸大容量存储设备。不过，预装风扇必须为此让路。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的比较表 。
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
Sequential Read:
2141 MB/s
Sequential Write:
2571 MB/s
512K Read:
1318 MB/s
512K Write:
2285 MB/s
4K Read:
48.48 MB/s
4K Write:
102.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
670.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
551.7 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4663 (3995.26-4684.2)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4795 (3366.33-4823.24)
Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0: Ø3302 (1830.49-4799.45)
Acemagic AM20 AirDisk APF 10-512G: Ø3443 (3235.28-3456.53)
Morefine M600, 6600U Transcend M.2 SSD 2200S TS512GMTE220S: Ø1047 (95.4-2400.59)
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G: Ø1820 (713.49-2039.48)
Geekom Mini IT12 Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0: Ø2178 (1555.46-2595.65)
Maxtang MTN-FP750 Foresee VP1000F512G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3025 (2610.09-3059.95)
显卡 - AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS，iPGU 为 Radeon 780M
如前所述 AMD Radeon 780M处理 Acemagic AM18 上的图像输出。iGPU 性能卓越，在同类设备中名列前茅。在这一点上，我们再次看到与 Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX.让我们看看 Aoostar GOD77进行比较： AMD AMD Radeon 780M与前代产品相比，性能优势明显。Acemagic 在这里做出了正确的选择，将其列入了小型游戏 PC 的愿望清单。即使是英特尔的 Arc 8（现在被用作新款 Meteor Lake SoC 的 iGPU），也无法赶上 AMD 的 iGPU。我们以 Acemagic F2A最近。
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Superposition | ComputeMark v2.1 | LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | Affinity Photo 2 | Photoshop PugetBench | Premiere Pro PugetBench
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic AM18, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Minisforum Mercury Series EM780, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840U | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX, AMD Radeon 680M R9 6900HX | ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro, AMD Radeon 680M R9 6900HX | Aoostar GOD77, AMD Radeon 680M R7 7735HS | Maxtang MTN-FP750, AMD Radeon 680M R7 7735HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECviewperf 12 | -1% | -15% | -49% | -17% | -4% | -10% | -45% | -25% | |
| 1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 83.7 | 85 2% | 75.6 -10% | 49.8 -41% | 75.3 -10% | 87.4 4% | 83.3 0% | 46.9 -44% | 71 ? -15% |
| 1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 88.5 | 89.8 1% | 69.2 -22% | 48.2 -46% | 70.3 -21% | 77.3 -13% | 83.3 -6% | 51.5 -42% | 62.6 ? -29% |
| 1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 56.3 | 51.1 -9% | 44.3 -21% | 23.1 -59% | 45.2 -20% | 51.3 -9% | 51.6 -8% | 33.2 -41% | 34.7 ? -38% |
| 1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 71.5 | 73.4 3% | 63.8 -11% | 54.9 -23% | 58.3 -18% | 73.2 2% | 70 -2% | 45.2 -37% | 61 ? -15% |
| 1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 60.5 | 61.7 2% | 46 -24% | 16.9 -72% | 44 -27% | 51.3 -15% | 27.1 -55% | 17.9 -70% | 26.2 ? -57% |
| 1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 30 | 30.1 0% | 29.1 -3% | 18.2 -39% | 30.1 0% | 33.6 12% | 31.6 5% | 17.5 -42% | 34.9 ? 16% |
| 1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 116 | 113 -3% | 96.5 -17% | 42.7 -63% | 88.8 -23% | 108 -7% | 108 -7% | 72.1 -38% | 69.7 ? -40% |
| SPECviewperf 13 | 2% | -16% | -55% | -18% | -8% | -16% | -46% | -23% | |
| 3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 83.1 | 86.1 4% | 75.9 -9% | 46.4 -44% | 76.7 -8% | 87.6 5% | 81.7 -2% | 48.3 -42% | 70.9 ? -15% |
| Catia (catia-05) | 129 | 132 2% | 101 -22% | 71.6 -44% | 105 -19% | 118 -9% | 118 -9% | 73.9 -43% | 91.5 ? -29% |
| Creo (creo-02) | 92 | 93.6 2% | 82.2 -11% | 29.6 -68% | 78.4 -15% | 83.5 -9% | 80.4 -13% | 44.9 -51% | 70.1 ? -24% |
| Energy (energy-02) | 24.1 | 25.8 7% | 18.4 -24% | 5.69 -76% | 13.9 -42% | 14.6 -39% | 14.1 -41% | 11.4 -53% | 17.7 ? -27% |
| Maya (maya-05) | 108 | 108 0% | 94.6 -12% | 59.5 -45% | 99 -8% | 109 1% | 101 -6% | 58.3 -46% | 94.7 ? -12% |
| Medical (medical-02) | 79 | 79.8 1% | 56.3 -29% | 29.7 -62% | 44.9 -43% | 63.1 -20% | 37.5 -53% | 32.8 -58% | 33 ? -58% |
| Showcase (showcase-02) | 29.9 | 30 0% | 29 -3% | 18.2 -39% | 30.4 2% | 33.6 12% | 31.2 4% | 17.4 -42% | 34.5 ? 15% |
| Solidworks (sw-04) | 107 | 107 0% | 89.7 -16% | 44.8 -58% | 95 -11% | 101 -6% | 103 -4% | 72.9 -32% | 74.4 ? -30% |
| SPECviewperf 2020 | 1% | -12% | -54% | -7% | -10% | -19% | -50% | -13% | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 13 | 12 -8% | 8.2 -37% | 5.05 -61% | 8.59 -34% | 12.1 -7% | 5.03 -61% | 4.72 -64% | 7.2 ? -45% |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 14.2 | 15.4 8% | 15.4 8% | 4.61 -68% | 16.9 19% | 7.98 -44% | 10.6 -25% | 6.6 -54% | 11 ? -23% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 31.2 | 31.4 1% | 27.1 -13% | 17.9 -43% | 28.9 -7% | 31 -1% | 29.5 -5% | 17.5 -44% | 29.8 ? -4% |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 20.7 | 21 1% | 18.6 -10% | 12.9 -38% | 17.5 -15% | 19.1 -8% | 17.5 -15% | 9.26 -55% | 21.4 ? 3% |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 61.1 | 61.5 1% | 55.4 -9% | 5.7 -91% | 58.5 -4% | 59.7 -2% | 56.7 -7% | 33 -46% | 42.7 ? -30% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 46.7 | 47.2 1% | 42.2 -10% | 35.4 -24% | 47.4 1% | 47.5 2% | 46.4 -1% | 29.5 -37% | 57.9 ? 24% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
1% | -14% /
-15% | -53% /
-53% | -14% /
-14% | -7% /
-7% | -15% /
-15% | -47% /
-47% | -20% /
-21% |
| 3DMark 05 Standard | 53787 points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 44009 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 43277 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13425 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 171827 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37159 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7664 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4093 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3271 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
在 Acemagic AM18 中安装 AMD Radeon 780M 后，许多游戏都能流畅运行。不过，不能一概而论。对于某些游戏，如果要达到至少 40 FPS，细节的减少是不可避免的。使用 FSR 可以进一步提高帧频，但这一功能在性能和质量方面总是会有所妥协。如果您正在寻找一款具有良好 3D 性能的紧凑型 PC，那么 AMD Radeon 780M 是您的不二之选。但即使是在这种情况下，您也必须仔细观察，因为 Minisforum EM780 也配备了这样的 iGPU，但由于采用了更经济的 SoC，其游戏性能要低得多。
目前，只有专用图形适配器才能提供更高的 3D 性能。例如Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G 或Acemagic Tank03 。不过，就价格而言，这些设备属于另类。提高图形性能的另一种方法是使用 eGPU。Acemagic AM18 具有 USB4 接口，在下面的章节中，我们将介绍两种不同 eGPU 的 3D 性能。
。
要详细了解 iGPU 与其他显卡相比的性能，请参阅我们的GPU 游戏列表 。
The Witcher 3 | Borderlands 3 | GTA V | Far Cry 5 | Far Cry New Dawn | Dota 2 Reborn | F1 2020 | GRID Legends | Shadow of the Tomb Raider
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Borderlands 3 | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| 1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| GTA V | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM18 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M: Ø28.6 (27-30)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M: Ø29.7 (28-31)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores: Ø22.8 (21-25)
Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M: Ø24.7 (23-27)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 165.1 | 156.2 | 66.7 | 26.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 148.9 | 96.8 | 49.3 | 31.7 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 163.1 | 130.1 | 82.9 | 77.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 77.7 | 39.3 | 29.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 69.6 | 48 | 40.6 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 84 | 49 | 46 | 44 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 167.8 | 66.7 | 57 | 49 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 101.2 | 43.3 | 40.3 | 35.1 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 74 | 47 | 44 | 41 |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 90.7 | 37.8 | 28.7 | 23.8 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 101.9 | 50.3 | 32.7 | 26 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 194.4 | 100.2 | 79.5 | 54.3 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 225 | 113 | 86.5 | 37.3 |
| God of War (2022) | 42.6 | 34.3 | 27.5 | 20 |
| GRID Legends (2022) | 102.1 | 80.5 | 62.5 | 48.4 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 73.9 | 53.4 | 36.7 | 29.6 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 99.6 | 87.6 | 66.2 | 18.4 |
| Atomic Heart (2023) | 58.5 | 46 | 27.4 | 21.6 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 93.8 | 83.6 | 60.9 | 14.7 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 45.4 | 35 | 27.8 | 24.4 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 89.5 | 75.5 | 61.5 | 55.6 |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 175.6 | 139.4 | 133 |
Acemagic AM18 配备两个 eGPU 进行性能检查
对于那些认为 AMD Radeon 780M性能不够高，但又不想使用传统台式电脑的用户，可以选择将 Acemagic AM18 连接到 eGPU。各种型号均可通过 USB4 连接。我们用 GPD G1 和 Razer Core X 以及 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 对测试样品进行了测试。后者的整体效果更好，但这更多是由于 GPU 的性能。遗憾的是 GPD G1 eGPU无法通过 OCuLink 连接到 Acemagic AM18。OCuLink 连接提供了更高的带宽，这将导致性能上的明显差异。
我们想指出的是，这些都是额外的测试，不包括在总体评分中。
配备 GPD G1 的 Acemagic AM18（AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT）
Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Unigine Superposition | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Heaven 4.0 | ComputeMark v2.1
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Unigine Superposition | |
| 1280x720 720p Low | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p High | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
| Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| ComputeMark v2.1 | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Score | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
| GTA V (2015) | 164.3 | 155.9 | 125.5 | 73.8 | 57.7 | 67.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 134.6 | 94.4 | 88.3 | 86.8 | 71.4 | 52.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 94.5 | 71 | 67.9 | 56.2 | 53.8 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 203 | 130.2 | 84.4 | 63.6 | 35.8 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 73.5 | 52.1 | 38.5 | 29.2 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 107 | 90 | 84 | 75 | 75 | 49 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 211 | 155.7 | 142.5 | 133.7 | 102 | 59.4 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 174.3 | 130 | 122.9 | 108.3 | 71.2 | 31 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 101 | 69 | 66 | 58 | 57 | 49 |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 60.1 | 37.4 | 38.6 | 33.4 | 26.7 | 16.8 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 90.9 | 80.1 | 72 | 67.1 | 57.6 | 31.7 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 306 | 196.3 | 163.2 | 114.7 | 91.5 | 56.6 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 323 | 237 | 160.1 | 86.9 | 63 | 32.9 |
| God of War (2022) | 56.6 | 56.2 | 54.8 | 53.6 | 50.7 | 33.3 |
| GRID Legends (2022) | 110.1 | 87.8 | 70.2 | 63.2 | 58.2 | 45.5 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 159.4 | 125.5 | 84.5 | 66.6 | 48.4 | 25 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 137.4 | 133.1 | 104.2 | 41.1 | 28.3 | 9.7 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 123.7 | 123.3 | 101.9 | 31.2 | 15.1 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 89.8 | 76.1 | 65.5 | 59.6 | 40.5 | 18.6 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 254.2 | 119.1 | 90.4 | 73.7 | 54.9 | 31.2 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 32 | 28 | 17 | 14 | 10 | 6.7 |
配备 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 的 Acemagic AM18
Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Unigine Superposition | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Heaven 4.0 | ComputeMark v2.1
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Unigine Superposition | |
| 1280x720 720p Low | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p High | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
| Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| ComputeMark v2.1 | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Score | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
| Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
| GTA V (2015) | 183.6 | 179.6 | 170.4 | 106.3 | 88.3 | 97.3 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 222 | 148.2 | 111.4 | 57.4 | 51 | 63 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 182.9 | 158.1 | 144.2 | 135.3 | 100.1 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 211 | 138.6 | 95.1 | 74.2 | 47.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 140.8 | 122.9 | 95.9 | 82.3 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 158 | 134 | 126 | 118 | 94 | 56 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 186.9 | 147.2 | 141 | 135.9 | 121.6 | 80.3 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 128 | 98.3 | 97 | 92.1 | 79.6 | 50.4 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 136 | 118 | 113 | 101 | 90 | 57 |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 118.4 | 79.1 | 60 | 45.4 | 40.3 | 30.8 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 141.7 | 119.8 | 97.4 | 79.6 | 61.9 | 37.4 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 197 | 105.2 | 108.7 | 89.2 | 77 | 53 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 124.5 | 94.1 | 59.1 | 45.1 | 41 | 36.4 |
| God of War (2022) | 101.9 | 91.3 | 78.1 | 61.6 | 53.7 | 38.6 |
| GRID Legends (2022) | 106 | 81.9 | 67.4 | 53.1 | 57.7 | 44 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 161.8 | 127.7 | 93 | 76.1 | 59 | 35.3 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 52.8 | 46 | 36.9 | 23.7 | 23.1 | 17.4 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 58.3 | 56.8 | 46.6 | 29.8 | 27.6 | 8.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 79.8 | 71.5 | 63.4 | 57.4 | 40.5 | 21.4 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 265.1 | 156.1 | 91.2 | 68.4 | 56.4 | 36.9 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 63 | 59 | 53 | 43 | 32 | 10 |
排放 - Acemagic AM18 的噪音也很大
噪音排放
在噪音测量方面，Acemagic AM18 与 Aoostar GOD77 完全相同。虽然风扇从未停转，但这款微型电脑在空载时相当安静。在平均负载和游戏时，我们测得的声压级略高于 37 dB(A)。在满载情况下，CPU 风扇偶尔会转速升高，声音明显超过 50 dB(A)。值得肯定的是，底部的风扇听不到声音。此外，也没有增加主观音量感的高频风扇噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 31 / 31.2 / 31.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 37.1 / 53.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A) | ||
| Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 11% | 7% | 2% | -3% | -7% | 1% | 8% | |
| off / environment * | 24.8 | 24.8 -0% | 25.1 -1% | 24.9 -0% | 30 -21% | 30 -21% | 25 -1% | 25 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 28.5 8% | 30.1 3% | 25.4 18% | 33.2 -7% | 31.3 -1% | 30.7 1% | 25.3 18% |
| Idle Average * | 31.2 | 28.5 9% | 30.3 3% | 25.7 18% | 33.6 -8% | 31.3 -0% | 31.7 -2% | 25.3 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.4 | 28.7 9% | 30.4 3% | 25.7 18% | 33.6 -7% | 31.4 -0% | 31.8 -1% | 25.4 19% |
| Load Average * | 37.1 | 32.4 13% | 32.2 13% | 47.8 -29% | 36.8 1% | 47.6 -28% | 36.4 2% | 45.1 -22% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.6 | 32.7 13% | 36.8 2% | 45.23 -20% | 35.5 6% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 53.7 | 39.6 26% | 37.9 29% | 49 9% | 39.8 26% | 47.8 11% | 52.4 2% | 45.3 16% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Acemagic AM18 只有一个塑料外壳，但在压力测试过程中仍然发热严重。虽然顶部温度相对较低，但我们看到底部的温度值最高。处理器本身在压力测试中的温度略低于 88 °C，仍在合理范围内。SoC 也可以在 45 瓦的功率下长时间运行，而不会有性能下降的风险。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.2 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 26 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.2 °C / 90 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 26 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.2 °C / 90 F.
耗电量
遗憾的是，在功耗方面，Acemagic AM18 不如许多性能类似的迷你 PC 那样经济。在空闲模式下，我们记录到 RGB 灯光（颜色变化）打开时的耗电量为 9.8 至 15.3 瓦。在平均负载下，能耗需求攀升至约 75 瓦。同时，我们也记录了短时间内高达 103 瓦的功耗，100 瓦的电源仍能应付。我们无法确定耗电量是否长期居高不下。我们也没有发现电源有任何问题。不过，制造商本可以为 AM18 配备 120 瓦的电源装置。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 2.1 / 2.4 Watt |
| Idle | 9.8 / 11.5 / 15.3 Watt |
| Load |
75.3 / 102.8 Watt |
   
| |
| Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 25% | 9% | 21% | 10% | 12% | 34% | 29% | 10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.8 | 8.5 13% | 10.2 -4% | 9.1 7% | 6.8 31% | 9.6 2% | 7.9 19% | 7 29% | 6.37 ? 35% | 9.75 ? 1% |
| Idle Average * | 11.5 | 10.5 9% | 10.9 5% | 10.3 10% | 9.4 18% | 9.9 14% | 9.5 17% | 8.1 30% | 8.59 ? 25% | 11.7 ? -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15.3 | 12.9 16% | 12.2 20% | 14.4 6% | 13.7 10% | 11.8 23% | 12.2 20% | 8.4 45% | 11.3 ? 26% | 14.7 ? 4% |
| Load Average * | 75.3 | 67.2 11% | 31.7 58% | 54.9 27% | 45.3 40% | 77.5 -3% | 77.7 -3% | 54.2 28% | 52.8 ? 30% | 51.9 ? 31% |
| Load Maximum * | 102.8 | 97.2 5% | 55 46% | 110.4 -7% | 94.8 8% | 89.8 13% | 93.4 9% | 61.4 40% | 73.6 ? 28% | 86 ? 16% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with external monitor
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11.5 (10.5-15.3)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11.8 (11.1-13)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.4 (9.08-14.4)
Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.6 (10.2-12.2)
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø84 (78.4-92.3)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø75.7 (71-78.2)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (45.6-52.4)
Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø75.7 (70.8-77.8)
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø88.5 (87.3-102.8)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.7 (89.2-96.9)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.2 (78.7-114)
Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø86.6 (84.7-100.1)
Power consumption with external monitor
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø87.8 (85.8-101.4)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø91.7 (89.9-97.2)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (92-110.4)
Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø86 (85.4-86.6)
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.9 (80.6-96.2)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88.8 (84.1-90.6)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (99.2-107)
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø37.3 (29.6-62.4)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33 (24.8-86.2)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (19.4-55.3)
Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø37.9 (34.4-92.5)
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø81.5 (79.2-94.5)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø84.3 (81.6-89.9)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.7 (97.2-108.6)
Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø81.2 (79.1-93.9)
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø85.6 (78-95.5)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø73.5 (66.5-84.1)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (47.3-60.6)
Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø79.4 (65.5-90.1)
Pros
+ 引人注目的设计
+ 无需软件即可控制 RGB 灯光
+ AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 良好的功率输出
+ SoC 性能稳定
+ 32 GB DDR5 内存（5,600 MT/s）
+ AMD Radeon 780M
+ 2.5G 局域网
+ 易于打开
+ USB4
+ 低 DPC 延迟
Cons
- 外观廉价的塑料外壳
- 功耗有点高
- 电源在某些地方工作到极限
- 压力测试时声音较大
- 底部螺丝上粘有橡胶脚垫
- 无线局域网性能
评价 - 办公和简单游戏的良好性能
Acemagic AM18 具有良好的功能，外观引人注目。RGB 灯光非常吸引眼球，但材料的质量并不高。幸运的是，如果您不喜欢这种多彩灯光，可以将其关闭。这里需要强调的是，RGB 控制不需要额外的软件。做工不错，但并不完美。性能 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS性能不错，我们没有什么可批评的。Acemagic 在此无需担心与竞争对手的比较。SoC 的出色性能也影响到其 iGPU，这款小巧的 PC 适合玩游戏。AMD Radeon 780M 的性能无法与目前的台式机显卡相比，但从目前的 iGPU 中提取的性能却令人吃惊。即使是英特尔目前的流星湖系列 Arc 8 iGPU，在这方面也常常力不从心。
Acemagic AM18 是一款性能卓越、引人注目的迷你 PC。现代化的接口选择确保了各种可能的应用，没有任何不足之处。
它的连接性也很好，采用 USB4 接口，完全符合现代要求。遗憾的是，目前有些设备没有 USB4。而 Acemagic AM18 却不是这样，它可以用于更多应用：例如，它支持 eGPU（见附加测试）。Acemagic 在内存方面也毫不吝啬，为 AM18 配备了 32GB DDR5 内存。AM18 在 Wi-Fi 测试中稍有失误。这里安装的 Wi-Fi 模块跟不上竞争对手的步伐。
由于许多其他设备在效率方面更胜一筹，AM18 的排放也略显不足。从长远来看，负载情况下的噪音水平也并不令人愉悦。制造商本可以通过调整风扇转速来改善这一问题。至少你还可以手动调节风扇转速来改善这种情况。
价格和供应情况
配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 的 Acemagic AM18 在亚马逊上的售价约为 700 美元。
Acemagic AM18
-
04/11/2024 v7
Sebastian Bade
Mini PC - Weighted Average
Transparency
The present review sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
