Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ROG Ally Z1 Extreme评测--拥有120赫兹显示屏和AMD Zen4的游戏掌机

赛博朋克在路上。 华硕ROG Ally是一款强大的游戏掌机,是Valve的Steam Deck的直接竞争对手。得益于来自AMD的强大硬件,基于最新的Zen4 Phoenix移动处理器,这款游戏掌机甚至可以流畅地处理现代游戏。
AMD Gaming Radeon Touchscreen Windows Zen 4

当华硕在4月1日预告新的ROG Ally游戏掌机时,这似乎是一个愚人节玩笑,但该制造商真的进入了这个领域。去年Valve通过Steam Deck复兴了这一设备领域,现在似乎所有其他大厂商也想分一杯羹。

华硕在ROG Ally上使用了最新和最伟大的AMD Ryzen移动处理器。它们分别被称为Z1和Z1 Extreme,而Z1 Extreme在我们的审查单元中几乎是新的Ryzen 7 7840U(AMD Phoenix,4纳米,Zen4),但稍后会有更多关于这一点。这意味着与Steam Deck相比,应该有相当大的性能优势。否则,ROG Ally配备了16GB内存,512GB NVM-SSD存储(可更换)和7英寸1080p IPS屏幕,120赫兹,500尼特亮度。Ally Z1 Extreme的德国零售价为799欧元,功能较弱的Ally Z1为699欧元。

ROG Ally Z1 Extreme ROG Ally Z1
CPU AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
8个Zen4核心(4纳米)
高达5.1 GHz
AMD Ryzen Z1
6个Zen4核心(4纳米)
高达4.9 GHz
GPU AMD Radeon Graphics
RDNA 3 & 4 GB RAM/8.6 TFlops
12 CUs / up to 2.7 GHz
AMD Radeon Graphics
RDNA 3 & 4 GB RAM/2.8 TFlops
4 CUs / up to 2.5 GHz
RAM 16 GB LPDDR5-6400 (双通道) 16 GB LPDDR5-6400 (双通道)
SSD 512 GB NVMe
PCIe 4.0 / M.2-2230
256 GB NVMe
PCIe 4.0 / M.2-2230
显示器 7 Zoll IPS, 120 Hz, 500 nits
FreeSync Premium, sRGB
7 Zoll IPS, 120 Hz, 500 nits
FreeSync Premium, sRGB
价格 799欧元 699欧元

你甚至可以将XG Mobile外置显卡连接到ROG Ally手持设备上,因此你可以将Ally与GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑在家。我们的XG Mobile样品没有及时到达,但我们将在几天后添加与4090的游戏基准测试。当你使用Turbo模式时,这个组合应该工作得很好,因为CPU性能与最近审查的ROG Zephyrus G14(稍后会有更多介绍)。

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (ROG Ally Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme 8 x 3.3 - 5.1 GHz, 43 W PL2 / Short Burst, 30 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5-6400, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
7.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 315 PPI, capacitive, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Corning Gorilla Glass DXR Coating, TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, 512 GB 
, 428 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD (UHS-II), 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.22 x 280.44 x 111.2
Battery
40 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo (2x 1W), Armoury Crate SE, 3-month Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
611 g, Power Supply: 223 g
Price
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.5 %
05/2023
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
611 g21.22 mm7.00"1920x1080
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
,
669 g49 mm7.00"1280x800
80.3 %
03/2023
GPD Win 4
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
607 g28 mm6.00"1920x1080
84.5 %
07/2022
GPD Win Max 2
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1 kg23 mm10.10"2560x1600

外壳 - 功能性塑料设计

ROG Ally使用白色塑料底盘,有不同的设计元素。握把处的表面有纹理,以便更好地抓握(前面是条纹,后面是三角形图案)。这样做效果很好,Ally握起来非常舒服。与Steam Deck相比,Ally更紧凑,更密集,因为重量相当。然而,Steam Deck的手柄更厚,这对人体工程学更有利。两台设备的机箱质量相当。

ROG Ally的建造质量非常好,你无法扭曲或凹陷机箱。在我们的评测单元上,我们也没能激起吱吱嘎嘎的声音。没有内置脚架,这可能是一个问题。有一个白色的小支架(由纸板制成),包括ROG字样,它是功能性的,看起来很好。

我们喜欢整体设计,黑色的按钮以及黑色的边框形成了一个很好的对比。Aura Sync技术的粉丝们会对拇指杆周围的照明圆圈感到高兴。

与Steam Deck相比,ROG Ally明显更加紧凑,尽管两者的重量基本相同,略高于600克。另一方面,GPD Win 4的6英寸屏幕甚至更小。华硕为ROG Ally配备了一个65W的电源适配器。

尺寸比较

298 mm 117 mm 49 mm 669 g280.44 mm 111.2 mm 21.22 mm 611 g227 mm 160 mm 23 mm 1 kg220 mm 92 mm 28 mm 607 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - XG Mobile和microSD

你在端口方面非常有限,因为只有一个USB-C端口或XG移动eGPU的连接器,分别。这意味着,例如,当你想连接外部硬盘时,你必须拆除电源适配器。华硕没有包括USB 4.0,但底部缺乏一个额外的端口(用于简单的扩展坞),在实践中是一个更大的问题。没有网络摄像头,但电源按钮上有一个指纹扫描仪。由于表面积小,设置起来需要更长的时间,但一旦指纹被注册,它就能完美无缺地工作。

USB-C端口支持通过DisplayPort进行视频输出,我们使用ROG Ally通过USB-C(包括USB集线器)连接到我们的Eizo 2795屏幕没有问题,因此我们可以使用屏幕的输入设备、网络连接和连接的扬声器。尽管这绝对不是主要的使用情况,但ROG Ally几乎可以像其他装有Windows 11的笔记本电脑一样工作,也可以用于生产性工作。

顶部:电源按钮,带指纹扫描仪,音量,XG移动(USB-C 3.2 Gen.2,带电源传输和DisplayPort-ALT模式),微型SD卡读卡器,3.5毫米立体声插孔
顶部:电源按钮,带指纹扫描仪,音量,XG移动(USB-C 3.2 Gen.2,带电源传输和DisplayPort-ALT模式),微型SD卡读卡器,3.5毫米立体声插孔

SD卡阅读器

与Steam Deck和GPD Win 4相比,顶部的microSD读卡器的速度要快得多。我们结合参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)的传输速率超过了260 MB/s,这意味着你也可以在快速的microSD卡上存储游戏。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193.9 MB/s +46%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
132.4 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)
93.3 MB/s -30%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
63.3 MB/s -52%
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
42 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
265.8 MB/s
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
238.6 MB/s -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years)
122.6 MB/s -54%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
92.8 MB/s -65%

沟通

华硕为ROG Ally配备了RealTek公司目前的MT9722 Wi-Fi模块,它支持蓝牙5.2以及最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准。在我们的测试中,我们无法连接到华硕参考路由器的相应6GHz网络,但5GHz的性能令人印象深刻,传输速度快且稳定,Ally不必躲在全尺寸笔记本电脑后面。如果你想使用Xbox Game Pass等游戏的流媒体服务,这是个好消息。

Networking
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1648 (min: 1587) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1735 (min: 1708) MBit/s ∼100%
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
669 (min: 485) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
990 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
712 (min: 410) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
951 (min: 921) MBit/s ∼65%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1339 (min: 1169) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1460 (min: 1393) MBit/s ∼100%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1587-1746)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1735 (1708-1755)

辅料

我们已经提到,盒子里包括一个小纸板支架,但华硕提供额外的配件,如保护套或耳机。还有外置显卡XG Mobile与GeForce RTX 4090笔记本电脑,尽管这是一个非常昂贵的投资,为2500欧元。

维护

后面板由几颗飞利浦螺钉固定,可以非常容易地取下。在里面你可以接触到两个风扇、电池以及紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘(PCIe 4.0),它可以被替换。根据我们的信息,制造商计划在未来提供替换零件,如ne拇指棒,所以有经验的用户可以更换零件,因此不必送去维修。

内部布局ROG Ally
内部布局ROG Ally
可更换的M.2-2230 SSD
可更换的M.2-2230 SSD

输入设备和处理

现在我们来看看最重要的方面之一,输入设备和操作。首先,很明显,有康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus的电容式触摸屏,它的工作原理和你所期望的一样。但也有大量的按钮,一个D-pad和两个大棍子,类似于Xbox控制器的布局。顶部的触发器使用了霍尔传感器,所以手柄没有霍尔传感器(也是为了减少成本)。

按钮布局类似于Xbox控制器
按钮布局类似于Xbox控制器
带霍尔传感器的触发器
带霍尔传感器的触发器
背面的宏程序按钮
背面的宏程序按钮

然后沿着屏幕有四个小按钮,其中一个打开了极其方便的命令中心。华硕还在后部实施了两个宏按钮,作为Fn键的一种,允许用其他键进行快速操作,如启动屏幕键盘、任务管理器或进行屏幕截图。这里肯定有一个学习曲线,但一旦你习惯了,即使是标准的Windows控制也能很好地工作。

非常方便的指挥中心(可配置)可通过专用按钮访问
非常方便的指挥中心(可配置)可通过专用按钮访问
游戏或桌面的输入模式(可使用自动设置)
游戏或桌面的输入模式(可使用自动设置)

按钮和摇杆的质量也让我们想起了目前的Xbox控制器,这也意味着按钮的声音相当大。摇杆和扳机的配置选项非常好,你可以为每个游戏单独创建自定义按钮布局。华硕在这方面确实花了一些心思,在我们使用该设备的过程中,它的效果非常好。手柄上也有触觉反馈,你也可以调整振动的强度。也可以用ROG Ally使用其他游戏手柄或控制器(例如,当它连接到电视上时),因为它是一个普通的Windows设备。

显示器 - 120赫兹IPS面板

子像素阵列ROG Ally
子像素阵列ROG Ally
只有轻微的背光渗漏
只有轻微的背光渗漏

华硕使用7英寸IPS屏幕,全高清分辨率(1920 x 1080像素,16:9)。主观的画面印象非常好,但由于触摸屏层的原因,明亮的表面看起来有点颗粒感。然而,这是一个小小的不便,它并没有真正困扰我们,你必须非常接近才能看到它。由于120赫兹的刷新率,移动非常顺畅,你还可以从快速响应时间以及游戏期间的FreeSync Premium中受益。没有PWM闪烁,背光渗漏几乎不存在。

华硕宣传的亮度为500尼特,我们在屏幕中央的评测单元证实了这一点。平均结果是475尼特,这意味着爱丽并不像Steam Deck那样明亮(它提供的功能较少)。明亮的IPS面板的缺点是0.38cd/m²的黑色数值略有提高。由此产生的超过1300:1的对比度仍然很好,但黑色内容更加暗灰,特别是与OLED屏幕相比。

489
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
TL070FVSX01-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 513 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 474.4 cd/m² Minimum: 24.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 512 cd/m²
Contrast: 1350:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
67.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7.00
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
1280x800, 7.00
GPD Win 4
G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00
GPD Win Max 2
Toshiba HX_10.1_LCD, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.10
Display
-3%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
65.6
63.1
-4%
69.8
6%
sRGB Coverage
92.1
92
0%
91
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.9
64.6
-5%
66.6
-2%
Response Times
-165%
-202%
-157%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
10.5 ?(5, 5.5)
30.1 ?(13.6, 16.5)
-187%
26.8 ?(12.5, 14.3)
-155%
21.2 ?(9.5, 11.7)
-102%
Response Time Black / White *
6 ?(2.7, 3.3)
14.5 ?(4.8, 9.7)
-142%
20.9 ?(11.4, 9.5)
-248%
18.7 ?(9.1, 9.6)
-212%
PWM Frequency
1080 ?(70, 374)
Screen
-14%
-39%
-19%
Brightness middle
513
517
1%
413.1
-19%
396.7
-23%
Brightness
474
524
11%
407
-14%
381
-20%
Brightness Distribution
84
97
15%
81
-4%
89
6%
Black Level *
0.38
0.47
-24%
0.39
-3%
0.36
5%
Contrast
1350
1100
-19%
1059
-22%
1102
-18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.7
5.7
-54%
6.97
-88%
6.31
-71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.3
10.5
-27%
14.11
-70%
10.23
-23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.1
5.7
-12%
9.9
-94%
5.5
-8%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.18 101%
2.04 108%
2.17 101%
CCT
7732 84%
7733 84%
9571 68%
7502 87%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.24
1.44
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-90% / -44%
-81% / -56%
-58% / -36%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼饱和度扫描
卡尔曼饱和度扫描
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 灰度标定
已校准的CalMAN饱和度扫描
已校准的CalMAN饱和度扫描
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准

Armoury Crate SE软件为显示器提供了不同的预设(如具有较高饱和度的vivid或减少蓝光的EyeCare)。我们用专业的CalMAN软件分析时使用了默认预设。对于一个游戏设备来说,颜色偏差还可以,但画面明显太冷,而且有明显的蓝光。这种校准的优点是最大亮度较高,在我们自己校准后,亮度下降了约50尼特。但结果是灰度表现出色,我们也设法提高了色彩准确性。小的sRGB参考值覆盖了92%,这对于游戏手持设备来说是完全足够的。我们不相信任何用户会使用爱丽进行严肃的图片/视频编辑。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. Adobe
vs. Adobe

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.7 ms rise
↘ 3.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在一个晴朗的日子里(没有阳光直射)。
在一个晴朗的日子里(没有阳光直射)。
在一个多云的日子里
在一个多云的日子里

为了减少触摸屏的反射,华硕还使用了康宁大猩猩玻璃DXC涂层。这一点做得相当好,屏幕不像其他许多触摸屏那样有反射。即使在明亮的阳光下,你仍然可以合理地看到图片内容,尽管你必须使用全面板亮度。视角的稳定性很好。

视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - Ryzen Z1 Extreme/Ryzen 7 7840U的首次亮相

我们已经列出了两个不同的ROG Ally SKU的规格,其中价格较低的型号配有AMD Ryzen Z1在GPU性能方面应该明显较慢,因为它只使用4个而不是12个CU。这款Z1 Extreme在我们的评测单元中,其规格与新的Ryzen 7 7840U但Z1 Extreme可以在9瓦的较低TDP下运行(7840U:15瓦)。普通Ryzen Z1的CPU核心也少了两个。两种型号都配备了16GB LPDDR5-6400内存的双通道配置,并获得256GB或512GB SSD存储(M.2-2230)。

系统信息
系统信息
电源模式
电源模式
系统统计
系统统计

ROG Ally使用标准的Windows 11安装,所以我们在执行标准的基准测试套件时没有问题。当你启动设备时,Ally会自动启动Armoury Crate SE软件,让你直接访问最重要的系统设置以及游戏服务(如Steam、Origin等)和安装的游戏。这意味着,如果你不想的话,你真的不需要过多地摆弄Windows。

军械库周转箱SE的起始页
军械库周转箱SE的起始页
军械库板条箱SE设置
军械库板条箱SE设置
游戏服务
游戏服务

华硕的软件包括一个非常方便的实时监控工具,可以显示CPU和GPU的负载、当前的帧数以及当前的电池电量消耗,这非常有用。我们的评测单位仍然是用Armoury Crate SE软件的预览版发货的,最终的零售单位会得到一些小的改进(比如电源模式的实际TDP值)。你还会得到一个为期90天的Xbox Game Pass Ultimate免费试用版,在我们的评测中它运行得非常好(尽管它主要取决于你的网络连接)。

 
 

审查设置

你可以通过命令中心快速改变电源模式,这显然也可以通过Armoury Crate软件实现。甚至还有一个手动模式,你可以为Ryzen Z1 Extreme调整TDP值。我们用涡轮动力模式进行了以下基准测试和测量,因为这是获得最大功率的唯一途径。性能电源模式在游戏过程中已经明显变慢,考虑到有限的iGPU性能,这往往是现代游戏中流畅游戏和停滞之间的区别。我们在下表中列出了不同电源模式的TDP值:

功率模式 静音 性能 涡轮增压/带PSU 手动/带PSU
SoC SPL (= PL1) 9瓦特 15瓦特 25 / 30瓦特 15 / 30瓦特
SoC sPPT (= PL2) 14 瓦特 20 瓦特 30 / 43 瓦特 20 / 43 瓦特
SoC fPPT (= PL4) 17 瓦特 25 瓦特 35 / 53 瓦特 25 / 53 瓦特

我们还用性能电源模式重复了所有的游戏基准测试,因此你可以直接比较结果。电池供电的TDP要低一些,但我们的游戏结果只慢了1-2帧。安静的电源模式不适合游戏,因为性能实在太低。

处理器 - 带有Zen4 Phoenix的Ryzen Z1 Extreme

华硕在CPU方面并不吝啬,为ROG Ally配备了全新的装备了全新的AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme这实际上是新的Ryzen 7 7840U.我们仍在等待相应的笔记本电脑型号,但这个紧凑的游戏掌机已经让我们有机会检查AMD最新U系列移动处理器的性能。

Ryzen Z1 Extreme使用八个Zen4核心,并采用现代4纳米工艺制造。它可以同时执行16个线程,最高时钟为5.1GHz。我们对基准测试结果相当惊讶,因为考虑到小机箱的尺寸,CPU的性能非常好。在第一次CB R15运行时,Z1 Extreme在Turbo模式下可以短暂地消耗53瓦特,然后在几分钟内平息在40瓦特左右,最终在我们的循环结束时下降到30瓦特左右。在40瓦特的情况下,Z1 Extreme与目前的Raptor Lake擦身而过。酷睿i7-1360P运行在38W (联想Yoga 9 14)的多核基准测试中。它在30瓦时甚至快得多,与旧的Ryzen 7 6800U相比也有明显的优势。新的Ryzen 9 7940HS(65瓦)是我们比较组中唯一具有更好的多核性能的芯片(但不是很多)。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

0135270405540675810945108012151350148516201755189020252160229524302565Tooltip
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme; Turbo: Ø2271 (2104.49-2396.5)
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1487 (1450.64-1776.28)
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1070 (1059.8-1080.5)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2540 (2434.72-2659.22)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1607 (1576.98-1742.1)
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1703 (1611.41-2114.84)
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø1298 (1272.02-1735.28)
CPU数据Cinebench R15多循环(红色:加速,绿色:性能)。
CPU数据Cinebench R15多循环(红色:加速,绿色:性能)。

25/15瓦的多核性能更令人印象深刻,因为Ryzen Z1 Extreme仍然比目前的Raptor Lake更快酷睿i7-1355U在50/25瓦特时更快。我们将在我们的 "Zen4分析 "中对新的Ryzen Z1 Extreme/Ryzen 7 7840U的性能进行仔细研究。禅4分析文章中,并且还包括不同功率限制的结果。

安静 性能 Turbo Turbo电池
CB R15 Multi 1180分 1727分 2397分 2153分
CB R15 Single 222分 280分 280分 280分

AMD成功地提高了新Zen4芯片的单核性能(比Ryzen 7 6800U快20%左右)。Ryzen 7 6800U).英特尔在这方面仍有优势,他们的性能核心,但差距不再那么大了。更多的CPU基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
87 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
78.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 
75.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
71.7 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
69.2 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
62.6 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
59.8 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
57.7 pt
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
52.4 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
17263 Points +15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
14960 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years)
14189 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (13004 - 14960, n=2)
13982 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
11922 Points -20%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10546 (8992.1min - 10546max) Points -30%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10468 Points -30%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
10252 (8193.94min - 10252.5max) Points -31%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
6941 (6788.58min - 6941.04max) Points -54%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
1877 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
1825 Points +3%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
1796 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1793 Points +1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1779 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (1733 - 1779, n=2)
1756 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years)
1713 Points -4%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1534 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1488 Points -16%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6726 Points +15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5825 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (5109 - 5825, n=2)
5467 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)
5352 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
4472 Points -23%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4107 Points -29%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4060 Points -30%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
3907 Points -33%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
2653 Points -54%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
727 Points +5%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
708 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
697 Points +1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
692 Points
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
690 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (672 - 692, n=2)
682 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)
646 Points -7%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
602 Points -13%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
564 Points -18%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2659 (2434.72min - 2659.22max) Points +11%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2397 (2104.49min - 2396.5max) Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)
2321 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (2050 - 2397, n=2)
2224 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
2115 (1611.41min - 2114.84max) Points -12%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1776 (1450.64min - 1776.28max) Points -26%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1742 Points -27%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
1735 (1272.02min - 1735.28max) Points -28%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
1081 (1059.8min - 1080.5max) Points -55%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
283 Points +1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
280 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (268 - 280, n=2)
274 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
271 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
257 Points -8%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
256 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)
251 Points -10%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
246 Points -12%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
237 Points -15%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
450 Seconds * -111%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
349 Seconds * -64%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
310 Seconds * -46%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
304 Seconds * -43%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
289 Seconds * -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)
265 Seconds * -24%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
213 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  ()
213 Seconds * -0%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
73280 MIPS +17%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
62657 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (56966 - 62657, n=2)
59812 MIPS -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)
57411 MIPS -8%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
49708 MIPS -21%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
47518 MIPS -24%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47500 MIPS -24%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
40711 MIPS -35%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
29214 MIPS -53%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6776 MIPS +7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6316 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  ()
6316 MIPS 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
5863 MIPS -7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
5651 MIPS -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)
5639 MIPS -11%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
5549 MIPS -12%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
5472 MIPS -13%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
5431 MIPS -14%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12500 Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)
11372 Points +4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10917 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
10785 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (9589 - 10917, n=3)
10103 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
9159 Points -16%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7737 Points -29%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7613 Points -30%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
6499 Points -40%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2029 Points +4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1956 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (1896 - 1956, n=3)
1917 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
1790 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)
1758 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
1751 Points -10%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
1734 Points -11%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1549 Points -21%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1514 Points -23%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.4 fps
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (16.3 - 18.4, n=2)
17.4 fps -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)
15.6 fps -15%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
13 fps -29%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
12.9 fps -30%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
12.6 fps -32%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
10.6 fps -42%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
7.57 fps -59%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
54.1 s * -26%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
50.9 s * -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)
48 s * -12%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (43 - 52.3, n=2)
47.7 s * -11%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
47.5 s * -10%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
45.3 s * -5%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
43.6 s * -1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
43 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
36.9 s * +14%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
0.529 sec * -19%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
0.52 sec * -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)
0.4811 sec * -8%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
0.4612 sec * -4%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P
0.46 sec * -3%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
0.4593 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (0.4447 - 0.4662, n=2)
0.4555 sec * -2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4447 sec *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4159 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2397 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
198.3 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
280 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
96.2 pt
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 
88.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
70.1 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
68.2 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
66.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
49.9 pt
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
38.9 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24067 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (20714 - 24067, n=2)
22391 KRay/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years)
12788 KRay/s -47%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11279 KRay/s -53%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11187 KRay/s -54%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
10472 KRay/s -56%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7486 KRay/s -69%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4076 KRay/s -83%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
102584 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (86738 - 102584, n=2)
94661 Points -8%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
72386 Points -29%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
71474 Points -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years)
65480 Points -36%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50527 Points -51%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40675 Points -60%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
20086 Points -80%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4420 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (3854 - 4420, n=2)
4137 MB/s -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years)
3047 MB/s -31%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
2485 MB/s -44%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
2455 MB/s -44%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2361 MB/s -47%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2179 MB/s -51%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1207 MB/s -73%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106595 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (95153 - 106595, n=2)
100874 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years)
92085 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
89266 Points -16%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
86451 Points -19%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
82608 Points -23%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69720 Points -35%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
66277 Points -38%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14070 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (12936 - 14070, n=2)
13503 Points -4%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11141 Points -21%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
10724 Points -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years)
9055 Points -36%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6996 Points -50%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5874 Points -58%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5113 Points -64%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
54962 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (46180 - 54962, n=2)
50571 Points -8%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
39913 Points -27%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
39378 Points -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years)
33558 Points -39%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
25330 Points -54%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
19985 Points -64%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
11157 Points -80%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
102968 MB/s +35%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
101595 MB/s +33%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76146 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years)
76070 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (57678 - 76146, n=2)
66912 MB/s -12%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
49619 MB/s -35%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
49062 MB/s -36%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42670 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
964 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years)
868 MB/s -10%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (687 - 964, n=2)
826 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
696 MB/s -28%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
684 MB/s -29%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
631 MB/s -35%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
630 MB/s -35%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
499 MB/s -48%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12875 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (10740 - 12875, n=2)
11808 KRay/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years)
6829 KRay/s -47%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
5926 KRay/s -54%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
5825 KRay/s -55%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5716 KRay/s -56%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4016 KRay/s -69%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2366 KRay/s -82%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42678 MPixel/s +14%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42386 MPixel/s +13%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
37540 MPixel/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years)
36824 MPixel/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (34764 - 37540, n=2)
36152 MPixel/s -4%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
33940 MPixel/s -10%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
27090 MPixel/s -28%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
25037 MPixel/s -33%

系统性能

系统性能非常好,考虑到强大的组件,这并不令人惊讶。与Steam Deck相比,性能优势非常明显,ROG Ally在任何情况下都更加迅捷和快速。我们的合成基准分数也很好,在审查期间我们没有发现任何问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
6907 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (6439 - 6907, n=2)
6673 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)
6602 Points -4%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
6394 Points -7%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6346 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
6195 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
5933 Points -14%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
5431 Points -21%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
12059 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
11822 Points +15%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
10743 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10709 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)
10473 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10296 Points
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
10205 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (10081 - 10296, n=2)
10189 Points -1%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10074 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (8996 - 10074, n=2)
9535 Points -5%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
9235 Points -8%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8984 Points -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)
8709 Points -14%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
7339 Points -27%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
7197 Points -29%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
7162 Points -29%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)
8686 Points +1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
8621 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (7990 - 8621, n=2)
8306 Points -4%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
7529 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
7472 Points -13%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7208 Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
6663 Points -23%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
5514 Points -36%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
1756 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1718 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  ()
1718 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years)
1701 Points -1%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1657 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1623 Points -6%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1575 Points -8%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1481 Points -14%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
1669 Points 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1662 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  ()
1662 Points 0%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1657 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years)
1622 Points -2%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1596 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1595 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1476 Points -11%
CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
1947 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years)
1893 Points +1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1878 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  ()
1878 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1727 Points -8%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1679 Points -11%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1596 Points -15%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1554 Points -17%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1593 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
1500 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years)
1462 Points +1%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1457 Points 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1451 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  ()
1451 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1418 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1293 Points -11%
PCMark 10 Score
6907 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92447 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (76512 - 92447, n=2)
84480 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
67015 MB/s -28%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62918 MB/s -32%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
61918 MB/s -33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years)
61455 MB/s -34%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
51518 MB/s -44%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
47701 MB/s -48%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
72065 MB/s +43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years)
60555 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58380 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
57493 MB/s +14%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (50337 - 55710, n=2)
53024 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
50337 MB/s
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
44068 MB/s -12%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
39402 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (92869 - 108872, n=2)
100871 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92869 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
77448 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
74086 MB/s -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years)
63628 MB/s -31%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
63189 MB/s -32%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
51117 MB/s -45%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
48723 MB/s -48%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
120.1 ns * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (113.7 - 119.5, n=2)
116.6 ns * -3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
113.7 ns *
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
110.3 ns * +3%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
107.3 ns * +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years)
102.3 ns * +10%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
98.7 ns * +13%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
95.5 ns * +16%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载)显示,当你想使用实时音频应用程序时,当前BIOS版本的评测单元有一些限制。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
1820.8 μs * -28%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1421.6 μs *
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
877 μs * +38%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
732.6 μs * +48%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
588.9 μs * +59%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
510.4 μs * +64%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘通过PCIe 4.0连接,根据华硕的说法,最大传输速率达到4.5GB/s。我们的评测单元配备了512GB的美光2400,在初始设置之后,你可以使用428GB的文件来存放自己的文件。我们的基准测试显示最大传输率超过4.2 GB/s,整体性能良好,尽管市场上有更大的M.2-2280硬盘,传输率更高。我们注意到,在持续工作几分钟后,有一些小的性能下降,但这在实践中是不明显的。更多的SSD基准测试被列在 这里.

Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4229 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1793 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 369 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 333 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 99.3 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 386 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1094 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83 pt
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
78.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
78.1 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
77.6 pt
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
69.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
66.7 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
54.3 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
 
54.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
3676 (3619.26min - 3676.31max) MB/s +75%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3382 (3242.21min - 3381.81max) MB/s +61%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
2942 (2917.56min - 2942.08max) MB/s +40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (756 - 4861, n=87, last 2 years)
2872 MB/s +36%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
2735 (2712.9min - 2734.9max) MB/s +30%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2119 (2112.04min - 2119.17max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
2106 (2093.38min - 2106.19max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
2106 MB/s 0%
seq write
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3188 (3158.91min - 3187.67max) MB/s +94%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3054 (3027.48min - 3054.47max) MB/s +86%
Average of class Multimedia
  (790 - 5709, n=87, last 2 years)
2977 MB/s +81%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2757 (2694.69min - 2756.71max) MB/s +68%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
2641 (2205.78min - 2640.73max) MB/s +61%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1644 (1600.76min - 1644.1max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
1644 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
1439 (1119.46min - 1438.8max) MB/s -12%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6654 (5007.16min - 6653.54max) MB/s +56%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
6592 (5400.38min - 6592.37max) MB/s +54%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1023 - 7121, n=87, last 2 years)
5217 MB/s +22%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4947 (4060.3min - 4947.18max) MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
4274 (3828.24min - 4274.42max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
4274 MB/s 0%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
3410 (3100.94min - 3410.49max) MB/s -20%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
3408 (2666.74min - 3408.08max) MB/s -20%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4938 (4919.31min - 4937.74max) MB/s +176%
Average of class Multimedia
  (871 - 6761, n=87, last 2 years)
3947 MB/s +121%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3548 (3383.07min - 3547.61max) MB/s +98%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
3052 (2945.64min - 3051.57max) MB/s +71%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2842 (2705.33min - 2842.27max) MB/s +59%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
2487 (1182.32min - 2486.59max) MB/s +39%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1790 (1750.28min - 1789.5max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
1790 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
77.5 (77.45min - 77.51max) MB/s +132%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
76.7 (76.25min - 76.67max) MB/s +130%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
71.3 (68.49min - 71.32max) MB/s +113%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
67.3 (66.05min - 67.28max) MB/s +101%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 149.1, n=87, last 2 years)
64.5 MB/s +93%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
59.7 (58.73min - 59.66max) MB/s +79%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
33.4 (33.02min - 33.38max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
33.4 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 write
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
276 (268.91min - 275.74max) MB/s +82%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
213 (211.2min - 212.65max) MB/s +41%
Average of class Multimedia
  (80.9 - 378, n=87, last 2 years)
178.7 MB/s +18%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
151.3 (143.2min - 151.32max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
151.3 (148.2min - 151.25max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
151.3 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
150.3 (141.14min - 150.34max) MB/s -1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
149.4 (148.22min - 149.37max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1647 (1638.92min - 1646.84max) MB/s +67%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1402 (1399.84min - 1402.3max) MB/s +42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (416 - 4358, n=87, last 2 years)
1350 MB/s +37%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1227 (1201.13min - 1227.26max) MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
984 (894.6min - 983.67max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
984 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
795 (763.75min - 794.53max) MB/s -19%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
777 (765.59min - 777.23max) MB/s -21%
4k q32 t16 write
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1477 (1452.75min - 1477.08max) MB/s +240%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1113 (1107.59min - 1113.49max) MB/s +156%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=87, last 2 years)
1067 MB/s +146%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
506 (496.78min - 506.11max) MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
434 (400.52min - 433.94max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
434 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
431 (416.68min - 431.09max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
423 (381.07min - 423.49max) MB/s -3%
AS SSD
Score Total
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5566 Points +58%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
5343 Points +52%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2010 - 9972, n=84, last 2 years)
5067 Points +44%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
4364 Points +24%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
4241 Points +20%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3865 Points +10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3522 Points
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
3522 Points 0%
Score Read
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1859 Points +41%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1705 Points +29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=84, last 2 years)
1695 Points +29%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1679 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
1389 Points +5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1319 Points
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
1319 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1255 Points -5%
Score Write
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
3348 Points +106%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3101 Points +91%
Average of class Multimedia
  (545 - 4813, n=84, last 2 years)
2567 Points +58%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
2034 Points +25%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1818 Points +12%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1623 Points
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
1623 Points 0%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1437 Points -11%
Seq Read
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
5226 MB/s +54%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4664 MB/s +37%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4139.39 MB/s +22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1192 - 5730, n=84, last 2 years)
4005 MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3395 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
3395 MB/s 0%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2972.75 MB/s -12%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
2524.26 MB/s -26%
Seq Write
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
2759 MB/s +101%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2598.37 MB/s +90%
Average of class Multimedia
  (388 - 5175, n=84, last 2 years)
2553 MB/s +86%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
2462.4 MB/s +80%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
2335.06 MB/s +70%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2179 MB/s +59%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1370 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
1370 MB/s 0%
4K Read
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
73.42 MB/s +65%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
70.67 MB/s +58%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
68.6 MB/s +54%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
63.93 MB/s +43%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
63.64 MB/s +43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30 - 98.5, n=84, last 2 years)
62.7 MB/s +41%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
44.6 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
44.6 MB/s 0%
4K Write
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
248.73 MB/s +91%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
217 MB/s +67%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
205.1 MB/s +58%
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=84, last 2 years)
188.5 MB/s +45%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
177.01 MB/s +36%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
151.15 MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
130 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
130 MB/s 0%
4K-64 Read
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1490.58 MB/s +59%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1353.28 MB/s +45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (413 - 2989, n=84, last 2 years)
1231 MB/s +32%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1174.58 MB/s +26%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
935 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
935 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
798 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
777.37 MB/s -17%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
2855 MB/s +111%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2732.34 MB/s +102%
Average of class Multimedia
  (281 - 4265, n=84, last 2 years)
2123 MB/s +57%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1582.9 MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1356 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
1356 MB/s 0%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1336.04 MB/s -1%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1000.03 MB/s -26%
Access Time Read
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
0.078 ms * -117%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.168, n=84, last 2 years)
0.0578 ms * -61%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
0.045 ms * -25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.036 ms *
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
0.036 ms * -0%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
0.029 ms * +19%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.023 ms * +36%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
0.021 ms * +42%
Access Time Write
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
0.289 ms * -151%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.115 ms *
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
  ()
0.115 ms * -0%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
0.064 ms * +44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=84, last 2 years)
0.05992 ms * +48%
GPD Win Max 2
BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
0.046 ms * +60%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.027 ms * +77%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
0.017 ms * +85%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0210420630840105012601470168018902100231025202730294031503360357037803990Tooltip
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: Ø4046 (2891.85-4197.44)

GPU性能

GPU-Z AMD Radeon Graphics (Radeon 780M)
GPU-Z AMD Radeon Graphics (Radeon 780M)

我们已经第一次看到了新的集成式锐龙780M在我们对华硕ROG Zephyrus G14但这个强大的iGPU与缓慢的DDR5-4800内存相结合。另一方面,ROG Ally将Radeon 780M与16GB LPDDR5-6400内存(双通道)结合起来,但性能实际上并没有好多少。Ally只比使用较慢内存的780M快3%到9%。

这意味着Radeon 780M显然要比Iris Xe Graphics G7快得多,而且大致上与GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile的速度,但仍落后于GeForce RTX 2050.与旧的Radeon 680M相比,我们可以看到在功率水平相似的情况下,新的780M大约有10%的优势。当你使用高性能电源模式时,GPU的性能并没有慢多少(见下表),但对游戏性能的影响更大,因为CPU的性能也更低。

安静 性能 Turbo Turbo电池
Time Spy 图形 1073分 2565分 2854分 2706分

在持续的工作负荷下,GPU性能几乎完全稳定,Ally以97.7%的成绩通过了苛刻的Time Spy 压力测试。电池供电的性能略有下降,但我们仍然确定Time Spy 图形分数为2706分,这只是5%的赤字。请参阅我们的 技术部分了解更多GPU基准测试。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-12500H
100 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
76.5 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
73.1 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
72.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
71.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
70.3 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
63.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
60.2 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
60 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
48.5 pt
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10510U
47.2 pt
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
46.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
44.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-12500H
15411 Points +20%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12795 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12335 Points -4%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (7868 - 13932, n=35)
12196 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
11391 Points -11%
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
10915 Points -15%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10261 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
9679 Points -24%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9095 Points -29%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10510U
7291 Points -43%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
7222 Points -44%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
6751 Points -47%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
6430 Points -50%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-12500H
10621 Points +35%
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
7963 Points +1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7865 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8538, n=34)
7595 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
7593 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7213 Points -8%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6865 Points -13%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6683 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
5994 Points -24%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10510U
5616 Points -29%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
5601 Points -29%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
5506 Points -30%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
5419 Points -31%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-12500H
3938 Points +38%
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
2900 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2854 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3027, n=34)
2667 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2601 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2578 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
2419 Points -15%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2303 Points -19%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2287 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
1805 Points -37%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
1731 Points -39%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10510U
1634 Points -43%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
1628 Points -43%
3DMark 11 Performance
12465 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7353 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3191 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average of class Multimedia
  (110 - 683, n=6, last 2 years)
403 Seconds *
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
302 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
664 Seconds * -81%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
550 Seconds * -50%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
527 Seconds * -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (190 - 1374, n=83, last 2 years)
447 Seconds * -22%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (305 - 503, n=33)
376 Seconds * -3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
366 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
312 Seconds * +15%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

我们终于到了一个Gamin g手持设备最重要的方面--游戏性能。你必须记住,这仍然是一个集成的GPU,但Radeon 780M足够强大,可以在1080p下流畅地运行现代游戏,至少在低度或中度细节方面。虽然在3DMark测试中,纯粹的GPU性能是相似的,但我们可以看到在游戏过程中,Turbo和Performance电源模式之间的差异更大。我们默认的一组游戏测试显示,ROG Ally比它的直接对手更快,可以击败GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q,但它仍然被MX550,GTX 1650手机, 和RTX 2050移动版.

Performance Rating - Percent
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
100 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 -2!
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
72.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
67.5 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
57.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
56.2 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
53.9 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
52.3 pt
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T -4!
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
51.1 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
49.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
42.1 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 -1!
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
38.3 pt
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
36.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
39.6 (38min, 38P1) fps +44%
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
30 fps +9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 (24min, 26P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
27.1 (22min, 22P1) fps -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
26.4 (24min, 25P1) fps -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
24 (22min, 22P1) fps -13%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23 (19min, 22P1) fps -16%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
22.8 (21min) fps -17%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
20.8 fps -24%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
15.6 (14min) fps -43%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.8 (14min, 14P1) fps -46%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.6 (13min) fps -47%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
55.8 (15.1min, 37P1) fps +117%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
33.7 (2.89min, 5.52P1) fps +31%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
27.7 fps +8%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 (3min, 16.9P1) fps
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.8 (3min, 15.4P1) fps -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
24.2 (4.25min, 16.7P1) fps -6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
21.3 (3.35min, 14.5P1) fps -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
21 (2.09min, 14.5P1) fps -18%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.7 (4.92min, 7.09P1) fps -58%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.5 (4.53min, 6.29P1) fps -59%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
9.96 (4.27min, 6.37P1) fps -61%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
42.9 fps +55%
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
31.8 fps +15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.7 fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
25.9 fps -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
25.9 fps -6%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
24.8 fps -10%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.9 fps -14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
21.9 fps -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
20.8 fps -25%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
17.5 fps -37%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
17.5 fps -37%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
65.3 (38.1min, 50.7P1) fps +41%
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
51.3 (39.4min, 41.5P1) fps +11%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
46.3 (8.7min, 11.5P1) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
45 fps -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
44.2 (6.4min, 24.8P1) fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
41.7 (11.8min, 15.7P1) fps -10%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
41.5 (29min, 31.8P1) fps -10%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
40.2 (17.3min, 27.4P1) fps -13%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.3 (5.4min, 9.07P1) fps -39%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27.3 (8.7min, 10.3P1) fps -41%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
130.1 (114.7min) fps +72%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
101.1 (86.8min) fps +34%
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
80.8 (71.5min) fps +7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
75.5 (67.6min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
71.6 (57.3min) fps -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
70.9 (60min) fps -6%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
67.2 (58.9min) fps -11%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
62.7 (53.2min) fps -17%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
62.7 (53.2min) fps -17%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59.8 (50.7min) fps -21%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
58.2 (50min) fps -23%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
82.3 fps +175%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
73.4 fps +145%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
38.6 fps +29%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
38.5 fps +29%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
35.1 fps +17%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
33.6 fps +12%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
33.5 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
32.8 fps +10%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
32.2 fps +8%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.9 fps

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0510152025Tooltip
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M: Ø27.5 (24-30)

电池运行时间对于一个游戏掌机来说显然很重要。ROG Ally提供了许多功能,包括升频和帧数限制。限制帧率而不是功率限制肯定更有意义,因为在要求很高的游戏场景中可能会导致帧数下降。我们对所有这些设置进行了相当多的摆弄,但对实际功耗的影响相当小。唯一真正的区别是在涡轮和性能电源模式之间。该系统在Turbo模式下消耗约40-42瓦,考虑到40瓦的电池,其运行时间大约为一个小时。我们在150尼特下进行的Witcher 3 电池测试证实了这一点,运行时间仅为57分钟。然而,如果你选择性能模式,消耗量就会下降到22-24瓦特左右,因此你可以期待一个大约1小时45分钟的运行时间。

有可能用一个大的电源箱来改善运行时间。我们用一个99Wh的模型进行了测试(尽管它是旧的,我们非常肯定它不再提供额定容量),并将Witcher 3 ,在涡轮模式下的运行时间从57分钟提高到几乎3小时。我们非常确定,使用新的电源箱,你可以在涡轮模式下获得接近4小时,在性能模式下获得6-7小时。

显然,你可以摆弄一下设置和分辨率,以减少一些消耗(1-2瓦特应该是可能的),但我们绝对建议在电池上使用性能电源模式,然后调整设置,以便你可以享受流畅的游戏。更多游戏基准测试可在 这里.

Gaming Benchmarks Turbo mode

low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 126.9 122.2 59.5 25.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 47.2 27.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 127.2 105.8 85.6 75.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 75.2 37.4 27.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 50.8 37.3 29.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 73 43 40 37
Strange Brigade (2018) 147.6 64.8 54.8 46.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 97 43 38 33
F1 2021 (2021) 190.3 96.2 75.4 31.5
Far Cry 6 (2021) 80 48 41 30
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 38.6 31.2 24.4 23.3
F1 22 (2022) 86.6 77.9 57.9 15.1
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 37.8 24.8 19.5 14.8

Gaming Benchmarks Performance mode

low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 120.9 100.9 44.6 20.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 32 20.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 118.4 100.4 76.4 62.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 55.2 29.8 22.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 49.6 35.3 29.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 56 33 30 28
Strange Brigade (2018) 120.3 56.7 48 38.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 69 33 30 25
F1 2021 (2021) 148.7 62.3 59.5 25.4
Far Cry 6 (2021) 62 37 32 24
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 27.7 21.7 17.2 16.6
F1 22 (2022) 60.6 52.6 43.9 11.6
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 23.4 18.1 12.2

排放 - 温度和风扇噪音是可以接受的

系统噪音

ROG Ally Cooling(图片:华硕)。
ROG Ally Cooling(图片:华硕)。

华硕使用了一个带有两个风扇的冷却解决方案,在每个倾斜角度都能工作(制造商称其为零重力冷却)。新鲜空气从后面吸进来,暖空气通过设备顶部的风扇排气口散去。在进气口处有一个防尘罩,以防止风扇变脏。看一下这些小风扇可能会引起对高亢的风扇噪音的担忧,但幸运的是,情况并非如此。

这两个风扇对一般的负载变化相当敏感(与电源模式无关),在轻度工作负荷时也是如此。这并不是一个真正的问题,因为风扇的噪音非常小,大约为27 dB(A),但它表明由于空间有限,被动冷却性能非常低。负载下的风扇噪音只取决于电源模式,所有测试中涡轮模式下为39.2 dB(A),性能模式下为31.2 dB(A)。这种差异非常明显,但在涡轮模式下性能也明显更好。我们没能得到更高的风扇噪音,也没有电子噪音(如线圈啸叫)。

Noise Level

Idle
23.3 / 23.3 / 27.3 dB(A)
Load
39.2 / 39.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2023.520.222.425.124.62525.522.123.528.924.13123.823.122.725.622.94024.52625.723.421.35023.62520.722.221.36322.320.618.218.916.2802127.616.818.116.610017.32515.217.317.112517.120.216.117.216.8160162114.515.515.720016.121.613.314.315.425016.221.713.71414.831516.823.81411.814.340018.625.614.612.11550018.726.513.511.114.563019.427.514.310.81580020.427.514.410.414.4100020.229.115.510.115.1125024.228.922.710.120.2160018.226.413.810.113.6200019.62813.910.714.4250018.326.613.710.814.6315023.229.412.111.312.3400015.630.711.711.511.650001324.111.911.711.9630012.518.512.21212.1800012.218.412.512.112.61000012.415.512.211.912.11250012.315.811.911.711.71600011.816.811.611.211.5SPL31.339.227.323.326.6N1.430.80.50.8median 17.1median 25median 13.7median 11.7median 14.4Delta2.63.81.51.21.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
,
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
Noise
-5%
-23%
-0%
1%
-5%
-2%
off / environment *
23.3
24.3
-4%
24
-3%
22.6
3%
24
-3%
23.6
-1%
22.8
2%
Idle Minimum *
23.3
24.3
-4%
31.2
-34%
23.7
-2%
24
-3%
23.6
-1%
22.9
2%
Idle Average *
23.3
24.3
-4%
31.2
-34%
23.7
-2%
24
-3%
23.6
-1%
22.9
2%
Idle Maximum *
27.3
30
-10%
33.5
-23%
28.5
-4%
24
12%
24.6
10%
26.9
1%
Load Average *
39.2
45.5
-16%
36.5
7%
33.1
16%
45
-15%
41.7
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.2
40.7
-4%
48.6
-24%
39.8
-2%
40.2
-3%
45
-15%
41.5
-6%
Load Maximum *
39.2
40.7
-4%
49
-25%
40.5
-3%
41.7
-6%
45
-15%
43.6
-11%

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管性能很高,但表面温度没有问题,因为两个手柄总是舒适的凉爽(这在下面的热成像中也得到了很好的说明)。背板显然升温不少,热点是顶部的风扇排气口周围的区域,在涡轮模式下高达49℃。然而,这些区域通常没有皮肤接触,当你把爱丽放在身体前面时,暖空气会被引导到远离用户的地方。在轻度工作负荷下,表面温度保持在30℃以下,所以没有任何限制。

我们的压力测试再次显示了涡轮和性能电源模式之间的巨大差异。几分钟后,SoC将分别在宣传的30瓦特和15瓦特处趋于平稳,并在测试的其余部分保持在这个水平。这是一个非常好的结果,一些紧凑型笔记本电脑无法做到。压力测试后,性能不会立即降低。

CPU/iGPU数据压力测试(红色:加速,绿色:性能)。
CPU/iGPU数据压力测试(红色:加速,绿色:性能)。

Surface temperatures Turbo mode

Max. Load
 43.8 °C44.2 °C40.1 °C 
 43.3 °C44.4 °C40 °C 
 42.8 °C43.3 °C40.9 °C 
Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 42.5 °C
26.8 °C37.9 °C32.8 °C
27.9 °C34.7 °C27.9 °C
27 °C30.8 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 37.9 °C
Average: 30.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43.3 °C / 109.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-14.5 °C / -26.1 F).

Surface temperatures Performance mode

Max. Load
 38.5 °C39.2 °C37.2 °C 
 38.9 °C40.7 °C38.1 °C 
 40.1 °C40.7 °C37.5 °C 
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Average: 39 °C
25.8 °C30.1 °C27.2 °C
25 °C29 °C27.4 °C
26.1 °C27.3 °C26.8 °C
Maximum: 30.1 °C
Average: 27.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-13 °C / -23.4 F).
表面温度Witcher 3 (正面)
表面温度Witcher 3 (正面)
表面温度Witcher 3 (后部)
表面温度Witcher 3 (后部)
表面温度应力测试(前)。
表面温度应力测试(前)。
表面温度应力测试(后部)。
表面温度应力测试(后部)。
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
17%
17%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.4
35
21%
28.6
36%
Maximum Bottom *
37.9
26.8
29%
33
13%
Idle Upper Side *
29.9
28.4
5%
24.6
18%
Idle Bottom *
28.3
25
12%
27.6
2%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

在设备前面有两个立体声扬声器(每个1W),因此声音是朝向用户的。这些模块能够管理好音量,整体质量也不错,但声音缺乏冲击力,尽管这对一个小型设备来说并不令人惊讶。我们的分析还表明,与Steam Deck相比,整体质量更好。

当你在性能电源模式下游戏时,你实际上可以将扬声器用于游戏音效。否则,有一个3.5毫米的立体声插孔用于耳机或外部扬声器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.1272528.928.73125.629.14023.430.75022.232.96318.934.98018.135.310017.339.512517.243.616015.548.720014.355.8250146031511.863.540012.165.850011.167.463010.868.980010.472.5100010.172.9125010.170.4160010.170.9200010.771.8250010.871.2315011.371.1400011.569.7500011.767.263001268.6800012.167.31000011.965.71250011.754.41600011.249.5SPL23.382.1N0.555.4median 11.7median 67.3Delta1.27.129.325.130.631.726.624.729.327.525.224.224.823.523.321.624.220.32133.117.74416.348.817.551.314.456.113.160.312.26212.267.81170.110.668.910.863.811.164.611.768.711.664.111.867.312.266.612.468.412.670.112.669.112.562.612.655125524.379.20.646.5median 12.4median 63.82.38.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Ally Z1 ExtremeValve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 33% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 19%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--电池运行时间有限的盟友

消耗功率

ROG Ally的最低空闲功耗为4.2瓦,效率不高。有一些拥有较大屏幕的笔记本电脑能够管理类似甚至更好的结果。在最大亮度下,该值增加到6.3瓦。负载结果与普通的AMD供电的次笔记本非常相似,在游戏期间和我们的压力测试中,几分钟后的负载结果为50瓦特左右。我们测量了65瓦的电源适配器的最大消耗量为67瓦,但电池并没有被耗尽。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.46 / 0.99 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.2 / 6.1 / 6.3 Watt
Load midlight 56.6 / 67.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 7.00
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
1280x800, 7.00
GPD Win 4
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00
GPD Win Max 2
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.10
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-7%
-37%
-26%
-83%
Idle Minimum *
4.2
5.4
-29%
7.5
-79%
5.8
-38%
Idle Average *
6.1
7.6
-25%
12.4
-103%
10.2
-67%
Idle Maximum *
6.3
7.8
-24%
13
-106%
11.5
-83%
Load Average *
56.6
46
19%
47.7
16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
64.1
31.1
51%
45.2
29%
45.6
29%
Load Maximum *
67.2
56
17%
76.8
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø64.1 (58.3-66.7)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø63.2 (50-67.1)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.95 (4.72-5.57)

电池运行时间

我们已经谈到了游戏期间的电池运行时间,根据电源模式的不同,你可以期待1小时到1小时45分钟。如果你使用该设备进行视频播放或网页浏览,40瓦特的电池可以管理更长的运行时间。在150尼特的调整亮度下(占我们评测设备最大亮度的40%),我们的视频测试运行了约9.5小时。在Wi-Fi测试中,我们在60和120赫兹下测试了不同的亮度水平,结果在6到8小时之间:

Wi-Fi battery test
亮度 60 Hz 120 Hz
150尼特 465分钟 444分钟
最大 397分钟 355分钟

当设备开机时,充满电需要90分钟。当电池电量达到60%时,充电速度下降,需要34分钟(大约50分钟后可获得0%的容量。

Battery Runtime
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
0h 57min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 45min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 112)
6h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 28min
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh
GPD Win 4
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh
GPD Win Max 2
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-3%
12%
31%
H.264
568
WiFi v1.3
465
450
-3%
523
12%
Witcher 3 ultra
57
Reader / Idle
581
923
Load
77
103

Pros

+ 功能性设计,具有出色的稳定性和制造质量
+ 可接入风扇和M.2-2230固态硬盘
+ 非常强大和现代的AMD Zen4 SoC
+ 优秀的IPS显示屏,适合游戏
+ 卓越的软件集成
+ 全面的可配置性
+ 快速的Wi-Fi和microSD读卡器
+ 用于eGPU的连接器

Cons

- 游戏时的电池运行时间
- 没有集成的脚架
- 只有一个USB接口
- 没有网络摄像头

结论 - ROG Ally是一款非常好的游戏掌机

在审查中:华硕ROG Ally Z1 Extreme。测试模型由华硕德国公司提供。
在审查中:华硕ROG Ally Z1 Extreme。测试模型由华硕德国公司提供。

新的华硕ROG Ally是非常成功的游戏掌机的第一次尝试。不仅硬件非常有说服力,而且以游戏体验为重点的出色控制和操作也给我们留下了深刻印象。专门设计的Armoury Crate SE软件是经过深思熟虑(并针对触摸进行了优化)的用户界面,也是所有游戏的控制中心,在你启动ROG Ally时默认启动。你可以舒适地在一个地方管理你的所有游戏,甚至为每个单独的游戏创建自定义控制方案。指挥中心可以通过触摸一个按钮随时访问(并且可以配置),这也是非常方便的,甚至包括实时硬件监控。有人真的在这些方面花了一些心思。Armoury Crate SE仍然只是一个单一的应用程序,带有完全库存的Windows 11操作系统,所以你只需将Ally连接到你的USB-C屏幕或扩展坞上,就能发挥其作用。

华硕在硬件方面也没有做出任何妥协,你可以用799欧元获得最新、最棒的AMD移动处理器。这其实是第一款设备,我们还在等待配备这些CPU的笔记本电脑。的AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme实际上是新的Ryzen 7 7840U,有8个强大的Zen4核心(4纳米,凤凰),包括新的Radeon 780M iGPU.在Turbo模式下的CPU性能特别令人印象深刻,在多核性能方面,这个紧凑的手持设备很容易击败大多数紧凑的笔记本电脑。我们已经非常渴望用外部的Ally进行测试。GeForce RTX 4090笔记本电脑我们将在几天后添加基准测试结果。我们怀疑CPU不会成为游戏性能的一个巨大瓶颈,当你考虑到华硕ROG Zephyrus G14,其中Ryzen 9 7940HS在游戏期间也被限制在45瓦特。

华硕ROG Ally是一款优秀的游戏掌机。由于强大的AMD Zen4处理器和快速的iGPU,这个紧凑的设备即使在现代游戏中也能管理流畅的帧率,你可以享受1080p屏幕的快速响应时间和120 Hz。ROG Ally唯一真正的缺点是玩游戏时电池运行时间有限,因为电池在1.5小时左右就会耗尽。

华硕使用的是塑料机箱,但整体质量完全没问题,建造质量以及稳定性都很好。你可以更换紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘,清洁风扇,并通过快速的microSD读卡器扩大存储容量。7英寸的IPS屏幕具有快速的响应时间和自适应同步,对于游戏来说是非常好的,而且也有足够的亮度,接近500尼特。

我们最大的批评是缺乏网络摄像头,以及当你真正玩游戏时电池运行时间短。如果你在Turbo模式下使用最高性能,最多一个小时后电池就会耗尽。在性能模式下,你可以将运行时间延长到1:45小时,但这几乎是最大的运行时间。否则,不容易找到缺点。一个内置的脚架在旅途中会很好,我们希望在底部有一个对接端口,这样电缆就不会从顶部伸出来。

注:我们在多媒体类别中对该设备进行了评级,因为我们还没有一个游戏掌上电脑的类别。当我们能够审查更多的设备时,我们将添加一个相应的类别。

价格和可用性

与Steam Deck相比,新的ROG Ally在几乎所有方面都更胜一筹,除了价格(Steam Deck配备16GB内存和512GB SSD的建议零售价为679欧元)。我们目前还在审查配备AMD Ryzen 7 6800U和更大的8.4英寸屏幕的One X Player 2,但它也更贵(1099欧元),配备16/512 GB。该GPD Win 4配有6800U,更加紧凑,但也更加昂贵。由于iGPU功能较弱,ROG Ally的低价SKU在游戏过程中会慢得多,所以我们想等待一个结论。游戏掌机领域似乎正在复苏,我们期待在未来几个月内有更多来自大厂商的设备。在那之前,新的华硕ROG Ally是你目前能得到的最好的游戏掌机。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme - 05/11/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
49 / 80 → 61%
Weight
81 / 20-72 → 100%
Battery
80 / 95 → 84%
Display
86%
Games Performance
77 / 90 → 85%
Application Performance
94 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
86%
Noise
92 / 95 → 97%
Audio
84%
Average
83%
88%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ROG Ally Z1 Extreme评测--拥有120赫兹显示屏和AMD Zen4的游戏掌机
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-05-11 (Update: 2023-05-11)