结论 - 配备 Ryzen 9 7940HS 的 Geekom A7 Max 迷你 PC:性能依然令人信服
Geekom A7 Max 是一款基于 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 和 AMD Radeon 780M iGPU 的强大迷你 PC。它拥有 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘,为要求苛刻的应用提供了坚实的基础。这款迷你 PC 还提供了日后升级设备的空间。不过,从我们评测的 3D 性能中可以看出,配备内存模块的配置仍处于劣势。广泛的连接性使它有别于其他许多微型电脑。其局限性来自于较大的外壳和缺乏 OCuLink 接口,这意味着 Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro 等机型在这方面更加灵活。A7 Max 的做工和设计都达到了很高的水准,这也是它的优势之一。
作为迷你电脑的典型代表,Geekom A7 Max 整体上也很节能,在日常使用中满足于低功耗。系统在空闲模式下保持安静,但在负载情况下风扇的声音清晰可闻。这种情况我们在 Geekom A8 Max 或 Geekom A9 Max 上已经很熟悉了。如果能对风扇进行更好的调控,那么设备的整体效果会更好。遗憾的是,Geekom 在 A7 Max 上再次失去了这一优势。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Geekom A7 Max 的目标用户显然是要求苛刻的用户。这款小巧的迷你 PC 配备了 8 核 16 线程的 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS,承诺在小巧的机身内提供强大的计算能力。这意味着 A7 Max 不仅要面对 Minisforum 等厂商的强劲竞争,还要在 Geekom 自己的产品线中站稳脚跟。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳与连接
Geekom A7 Max 采用了与 A8 Max 或 A9 Max 相同的更大的外壳,明显有别于早期型号。不过,Geekom 还是选择了常用的铝合金外壳,这意味着所有优缺点都保持不变。做工质量上乘,与价格区间相符。Mini-PC 的重量约为 681 克,尽管体积较大,但仍比一些竞争对手的机型轻,而 256 克的紧凑型电源装置也几乎不引人注意。
宽大的机身允许广泛的连接:共有 6 个 USB-A 端口,其中 4 个位于前部,后部有 2 个 USB4 端口和 2 个 HDMI 输出。这样,最多可同时操作四台显示器。侧面的快速 SD 读卡器使设备更加完善,而 USB4 可实现高数据传输速率,外置固态硬盘的表现令人印象深刻。
| Connectivity - USB 3.x / USB4 / TB - AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (423 - 3906, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (15.1 - 214, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (20.8 - 250, n=25, last 2 years) | |
配件
维护
Geekom A7 Max 出厂时已安装内存和固态硬盘,可立即投入使用。需要升级的用户可以打开外壳。内存、大容量存储器和 WLAN 模块都很容易拆卸和更换。不过,由于 WLAN 天线线缆较短,打开时要小心。
可持续性
Geekom A7 Max 只提供有限的维修服务,但提供 36 个月的保修服务。紧凑的包装使运输更加方便,而 Geekom 则强调低能耗的可持续性。
测试条件
所有测量都是在 Geekom A7 Max 处于交付状态(正常模式)时进行的。虽然 BIOS 中的性能模式可提高风扇转速和性能,但在负载情况下噪音水平会明显升高。
处理器
Geekom A7 Max 配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS(Zen 4、8 核、16 线程),整体性能稳定,在目前的迷你 PC 中处于中端水平。该 SoC 的短暂功耗可达 65 瓦,但在持续负载情况下,功耗会降至 45 瓦左右。尽管 A7 Max 处理器已不再是全新的产品,但它表明,在推出市场数年后,其性能仍然可以令人信服。
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| Average of class Mini PC | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| Average of class Mini PC (974 - 82725, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (537 - 43587, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Mini PC (8069 - 94259, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R15 耐用性测试证实,Geekom A7 Max 的散热系统整体设计良好。虽然在连续负载下性能略有下降是无法完全避免的,但比起 Geekom A9 Max.Ryzen 9 7940HS 的短暂功耗高达 65 瓦,最高温度约为 84 摄氏度。
系统性能
Geekom A7 Max 只配备了一个内存模块,这一点在测试结果中非常明显。因此,整体性能明显降低,也对日常使用中的主观性能感受产生了负面影响。
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Mini PC (82.3 - 184.8, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Geekom A7 Max 使用的是 PCIe 4.0 连接的 1 TB 固态硬盘,传输速率还算不错,但并不突出。不过,对于日常任务和生产性工作负载来说,所提供的存储性能已经足够。硬盘的散热设计使其即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定的性能。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器和游戏性能
搭载 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 的 Geekom A7 Max 依赖于集成的 Radeon 780M 显卡,在我们的评测中,其性能水平相当稳定,但由于只配备了一个内存模块,整体性能受到限制。因此,在合成基准测试中,该系统落后于同等配置的迷你 PC,而在游戏中只能达到有限的可用帧率。iGPU 足以应付简单的游戏场景,但正如预期的那样,A7 Max 无法与配备 RTX 4050 等专用显卡的系统相媲美。
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
SPECworkstation 4.0: Graphics Score | Accelerator Score | Viewport Graphics | HandBrake | ONNX Inference
| Performance rating | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / Graphics Score | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / Accelerator Score | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / Viewport Graphics | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / HandBrake | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / ONNX Inference | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945HS | Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255, AMD Radeon 780M Ryzen 7 255 | GMK NucBox M6 Ultra, AMD Radeon 760M R5 7640HS | GMK NucBox M3 Ultra, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-12700H | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECviewperf 2020 | 76% | 99% | 75% | 70% | 27% | -44% | 154% | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) (fps) | 15.6 | 12.7 -19% | 26.1 67% | 13.3 -15% | 12.6 -19% | 11 -29% | 3.38 -78% | 18.4 ? 18% |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) (fps) | 11.6 | 21.2 83% | 18 55% | 19.7 70% | 19.1 65% | 10.1 -13% | 2.96 -74% | 28.3 ? 144% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) (fps) | 17.4 | 34.9 101% | 36.2 108% | 34.9 101% | 33.7 94% | 26.2 51% | 14.7 -16% | 43.2 ? 148% |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) (fps) | 14.9 | 25 68% | 26 74% | 24.2 62% | 24.6 65% | 21.1 42% | 8.14 -45% | 29.4 ? 97% |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) (fps) | 10.3 | 21.4 108% | 25.2 145% | 21.3 107% | 21.5 109% | 15.8 53% | 9.48 -8% | 41.5 ? 303% |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) (fps) | 33.2 | 66.2 99% | 70.6 113% | 67 102% | 63.1 90% | 48.6 46% | 4.21 -87% | 49.2 ? 48% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) (fps) | 25.9 | 50.2 94% | 59.3 129% | 51.2 98% | 47.5 83% | 36.5 41% | 25.8 0% | 108.2 ? 318% |
| 3DMark 05 Standard | 44589 points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 29523 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 27581 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8210 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 127257 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26458 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4542 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2447 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1862 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 257 points | |
Help | ||
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| GTA V | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
30 分钟赛博朋克 2077》帧数表(1920 x 1080,超预设,FSR 关闭)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 107.9 | 97.1 | 33.7 | 13.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 80.9 | 52.3 | 26.3 | 17.6 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 128.5 | 93.3 | 65 | 58.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44.4 | 22.2 | 16.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 55.3 | 40.5 | 34.8 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 24.8 | 19.4 | 15.6 | 15.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 25.2 | 21 | 15.9 | 14.3 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 47 | 41.2 | 30.9 |
排放量
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.5 / 25.6 / 25.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43 / 45 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 Ryzen 7 255, Radeon 780M | GMK NucBox M6 Ultra R5 7640HS, Radeon 760M | GMK NucBox M3 Ultra i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -6% | 8% | -1% | 1% | -1% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.7 | 23.8 4% | 24.8 -0% | 23.7 4% | 24.9 -1% | 24.7 -0% | 24.8 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.5 | 24 6% | 25.4 -0% | 27.2 -7% | 31.1 -22% | 27.5 -8% | 25.8 -1% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.6 | 24.1 6% | 25.4 1% | 27.3 -7% | 31.2 -22% | 29.3 -14% | 25.8 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.7 | 24.1 6% | 25.5 1% | 27.3 -6% | 31.2 -21% | 30.1 -17% | 25.8 -0% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 43 | 42.7 1% | 49.8 -16% | 33.6 22% | 36.7 15% | 39 9% | 44.5 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 44.9 | 49.7 -11% | 37.9 16% | 39 13% | 45.6 -2% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 44.9 | 42.5 5% | 49.6 -10% | 34.4 23% | 37.8 16% | 39.3 12% | 46.4 -3% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 45 | 42.6 5% | 49.8 -11% | 34.4 24% | 38.4 15% | 39 13% | 44.7 1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 36.3 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.4 °C / 90 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.4 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.
能源管理
在本次评测中,Geekom A7 Max 是一款比较高效的微型电脑。即使在空闲模式下,功耗也很低,不过在平均负载下测得的功耗为 68 瓦。120 瓦的电源单元可轻松吸收约 93 瓦的短期负载峰值。在效率评级中,A7 Max 位居前列,仅次于 Geekom A9 Max不敌。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Khadas Mind 2 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom A8, R9 8945HS R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -39% | -5% | -13% | -37% | 14% | -6% | -47% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.6 | 9.8 -75% | 4.1 27% | 9 -61% | 8.2 -46% | 3.2 43% | 6.01 ? -7% | 9.12 ? -63% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.1 | 10.5 -48% | 6.6 7% | 9.7 -37% | 12.1 -70% | 4.9 31% | 8.14 ? -15% | 11.3 ? -59% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 8.4 | 13.6 -62% | 11.3 -35% | 12.5 -49% | 14 -67% | 6.8 19% | 10.3 ? -23% | 14.8 ? -76% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 57.5 | 67 -17% | 65.8 -14% | 49.7 14% | 53.1 8% | 71.3 -24% | 57.6 ? -0% | 65.3 ? -14% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 67.4 | 85.9 -27% | 69.4 -3% | 51.3 24% | ||||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 92.9 | 96.2 -4% | 104.8 -13% | 65.5 29% | 100.4 -8% | 93.2 -0% | 77 ? 17% | 112.5 ? -21% |
* ... smaller is better
功率效率
| Power Consumption | |
| Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra | |
带外部监控器的能耗
带外部监控器的能耗
笔记本检查评级
Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS
- 01/16/2026 v8
Sebastian Bade
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Dimensions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom A7 Max, R9 7940HS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $949.00 List Price: 749€ | 681 g | 132 x 135 x 46.9 mm | |
| Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $48.79 PowerHOOD 120W AC/DC Adapter... List Price: 899 EUR | 681 g | 132 x 135 x 46.9 mm | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,259.00 List Price: 999€ | 709 g | 132 x 135 x 46.9 mm | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $939.00 MINISFORUM UM890 Pro Mini PC... 2. $809.00 MINISFORUM UM890 Pro Mini PC... 3. $439.00 MINISFORUM UM890 Pro Barebon... List Price: 739 EUR | 709 g | 127 x 130 x 60.6 mm | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 AMD Ryzen 7 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $659.00 List Price: 579€ | 658 g | 126 x 128 x 52 mm | |
| GMK NucBox M6 Ultra AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 760M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $699.99 List Price: 336€ | 506 g | 127 x 128.8 x 47.8 mm | |
| GMK NucBox M3 Ultra Intel Core i7-12700H ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 429€ | 437 g | 106 x 114 x 42.5 mm |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.


























































