Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 笔记本电脑评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和 120-Hz OLED 的强大超便携产品
要了解联想目前的 IdeaPad 机型并不容易，因为除了普通的 IdeaPad 外，还有 IdeaPad Slim 和 IdeaPad Pro。我们测试了目前的 IdeaPad Slim 5 14配备了 酷睿 5 125H和 1080p OLED 屏幕（60 Hz），现在是功能更强大的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G9 的时候了。 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS以及 Radeon 780M 和 120 Hz 刷新率的高分辨率 2.8K OLED 面板。
我们的测试设备配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS、32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 OLED 面板，是不带操作系统的 Campus 版本，售价约为 1,000 美元。你可以直接从联想购买这个版本（包括 Windows 11 Home），价格约为 1300 美元，你还可以选择购买专用的GeForce RTX 3050 ，价格约为 200 美元。您还可以选择购买配备英特尔新款流星湖处理器（酷睿至尊 5、7 或 9）的设备，配备酷睿至尊 7-155H、32 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘的同类配置价格约为 1,500 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.1 % | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.3 % | 03/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 86.6 % | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Cores | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 87.5 % | 12/2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85.3 % | 06/2023 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.5 % | 03/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.6 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 |
外壳 - IdeaPad 5 铝合金外壳
在日常使用中，它的银色铝合金外壳不会太显眼，除了深灰色的键盘和腕托上的贴纸外，没有其他对比鲜明的颜色。因此，IdeaPad 无论在私人还是专业环境中都能轻松使用。IdeaPad 的边框纤薄美观，但有一个摄像头所在的凹槽。这确实使打开显示屏盖子变得非常容易，但看起来并不特别美观。光滑的表面不会留下太多指纹痕迹。
总的来说，铝制外壳看起来质量很高，至少第一眼看上去是这样。你可以明显地按压键盘区域，这也会导致一些细微的吱吱声。在这方面，你可以发现与 Yoga Pro 型号相比略有不同。另一方面，它的盖子比较成功，铰链调整得很好，单手打开没有问题，而且在调整角度时几乎不会晃动。其最大开启角度为 180 度。
在我们的对比组中，IdeaPad Pro 5 14 是最小巧的设备之一，约 1.5 千克的重量属于中等水平。市场上有比它轻得多的 14 英寸笔记本电脑，但即便如此，你还是可以把 IdeaPad 轻松装进大多数包里，这样你就可以在旅行中随身携带它了。
连接性 - 配备 USB 4.0 的 AMD IdeaPad
虽然 IdeaPad Pro 系列不属于联想的高端机型，但买家不必担心设备的连接标准。除 USB 4.0 外，您还可以使用 HDMI 2.1 输出和右侧的两个普通 USB-A 端口。
SD 读卡器
笔记本电脑的右侧是一个功能齐全的 SD 读卡器，与我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）配合使用，传输速率达到了 75-90 MB/s。插入的卡伸出机身约 1.8 厘米。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 193.9, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23.6 - 239, n=17, last 2 years) | |
交流
联想使用了联发科的 WLAN 模块（RZ616），它也支持 6 GHz 网络的 WiFi-6E 标准。与华硕的参考路由器配合使用时，它的传输速率非常高且稳定，但我们并没有发现它在使用 6 GHz 网络时有性能优势。在测试过程中，它与其他路由器的信号质量也非常好。
| Networking | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
网络摄像头
联想安装了一个带机械盖的 1080p 摄像头，不过，其画质并不是最好的。与当前的 Meteor Lake 机型一样，AMD IdeaPad 也支持作为操作系统一部分的网络摄像头工作室特效（背景柔焦、眼神接触、跟踪）。此外，它还配备了一个红外摄像头，可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。
维护
除了六颗 Torx 螺钉外，机箱底盖还用一些塑料夹固定，拆卸时要小心不要损坏。机箱内部的风扇可以清洁，WLAN 模块和 M.2-2242 固态硬盘也可以更换。电池用螺丝拧紧，必要时可以更换。
输入设备 - 按键摇摆不定的 IdeaPad
IdeaPad 在另一个方面落后于价格更高的同类产品，那就是它的键盘。虽然深灰色的按键提供了足够的升力和舒适的反馈，但键盘总体感觉有点摇摇欲坠，因此声音也相对较大。现在有一个 Windows Co-Pilot 专用键，电源按钮位于键盘右上方。键盘采用白色背光，有两个亮度级别。
其 12 x 7.5 厘米的点击板足够大，而且位于底座略低的位置，让你可以非常容易地触摸到它。在测试过程中，我们从未遇到过任何操作问题，但它的机械咔哒声听起来相当响亮。
显示屏 - 120 赫兹 OLED
联想为所有型号的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 配备了 14 英寸 OLED 屏幕。与 IdeaPad Slim 5 的全高清型号相比，它的分辨率和频率更高，分别为 2,880 x 1,800 像素和 120 Hz。主观而言，它的画质令人震惊，尤其是与 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 的 IPS 面板相比。色彩鲜艳，黑色真实，响应时间超快。它没有亮度传感器。
联想表示，SDR 使用时的亮度为 400 cd/m²，HDR 使用时的亮度可达 600 cd/m²，我们能够证实这一点。其 SDR 平均亮度约为 414 cd/m²，由于黑色值较低，对比度极高。这些数值符合当前的 OLED 标准，因此该屏幕的画质几乎相同。遗憾的是，这其中包括频率为 240 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁（亮度为 99 % 或更低）。我们测得的最大 HDR 亮度为 601 cd/m²（显示摘录图像时）和约 500 cd/m²（显示几乎全白的屏幕时）。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 411 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 LEN140WUXGA, OLED, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 LENOVO LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14.00 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y Samsung ATNA40YK07-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF), IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -1% | -3% | -0% | -5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% | 97.9 -2% | 99.9 0% | 98.4 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.9 | 97.3 -2% | 96.7 -2% | 92.1 -7% | 98.3 -1% | 86.9 -12% |
| Response Times | -110% | -64% | -1002% | -62% | -3770% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.61 ? | 1.78 ? -192% | 1.3 ? -113% | 10.8 ? -1670% | 1.19 ? -95% | 34.1 ? -5490% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.67 ? | 2.3 ? -243% | 1.2 ? -79% | 9.29 ? -1287% | 1.62 ? -142% | 14.4 ? -2049% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 489.7 ? 104% | 240 0% | 120 ? -50% | 362.3 ? 51% | |
| Screen | -2% | 10% | 6% | 17% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle | 411 | 388.3 -6% | 392 -5% | 387 -6% | 336.6 -18% | 464 13% |
| Brightness | 414 | 388 -6% | 388 -6% | 387 -7% | 339 -18% | 456 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 99 | 97 -2% | 97 -2% | 97 -2% | 98 -1% | 90 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.36 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 4.4 -57% | 1.75 37% | 2.03 27% | 0.84 70% | 0.9 68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 7.37 -34% | 4.46 19% | 3.86 30% | 3.1 44% | 2.32 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.2 | 0.64 71% | 1.59 28% | 1.6 27% | 0.35 84% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.4 22% | 1.8 -0% | 2.3 -28% | 1.4 22% | 1.4 22% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.249 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.218 99% |
| CCT | 6319 103% | 6339 103% | 6574 99% | 6523 100% | 6439 101% | 6669 97% |
| Contrast | 19600 | 38700 | 1289 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -38% /
-27% | -18% /
-9% | -333% /
-229% | -15% /
-7% | -1247% /
-609% |
* ... smaller is better
联想没有提供任何色彩配置文件，这意味着其色彩空间仅限于较小的 sRGB 参考值。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）进行了分析，测试设备开箱即显示出不错的性能，即使其色温略微偏暖。即便如此，还是有不少色彩偏差超过了 3，即使我们自己进行了校准（可在上面免费下载配置文件），这些偏差仍可得到改善，但无法消除。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.34 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.61 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.31 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
虽然这不是触摸屏，但 OLED 面板的反射率仍然很高，这限制了它在户外空间的使用。即使在室内，反光也会很快成为一个问题。除了轻微的蓝色光泽外，该屏幕在视角稳定性方面没有任何限制。
性能 - AMD Zen4 和 32 GB 内存
测试条件
联想提供了三种不同的能源配置文件：省电模式、智能散热和最高性能，我们在下表列出了各自的性能值。我们使用默认的智能散热模式运行了基准测试并测量了数值，但与最高性能模式相比，我们希望看到更宽的范围。
| 能源概况 | CPU TDP | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 1080p 低 | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 省电模式 | 33 -> 25 瓦 | 12,121 点 | 2,647 点 | 39.8fps | 31.5 dB(A) |
| 智能冷却 | 60 -> 50 瓦 | 15,889 点 | 2,847 点 | 42.4fps | 44.3 dB(A) |
| 最高性能 | 65 -> 60 瓦 | 16,389 点 | 2,818 点 | 42.8fps | 46.6 dB(A) |
处理器 - Ryzen 7 8845HS
......（英文 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS属于当前的 Ryzen 8000 代，使用 8 个 Zen4 内核（16 个线程），最高主频可达 5.1 GHz。它的直接竞争对手是 酷睿至尊 7 155H的直接竞争对手。 Yoga Pro 7的直接竞争对手，英特尔芯片的功耗略高，为 64/55 瓦。不过，在基准测试中，AMD 处理器还是略胜于 155H，即使在长时间负载的情况下，其性能也几乎保持不变，在电池模式下也是如此。采用英特尔处理器的 IdeaPad Pro 5 应该也能取得很好的成绩，但由于价格仅相差 200 美元，因此选择 AMD 处理器更有意义。更多基准测试请参见我们的 技术部分。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y -3! | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6796 - 13217, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2003 - 3130, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
系统性能
IdeaPad Pro 在合成基准测试和日常使用中都给人留下了极好的印象，我们在测试过程中没有发现系统稳定性方面的任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (119.2 - 448, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (67.2 - 325, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1913, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7216 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS () | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
IdeaPad Pro 5 14 安装了 SK Hynix 的 1 TB M.2-2242 固态硬盘（BC901），用户在首次启动系统并安装 Windows 11 后，有 903 GB 的空间可供使用。PCIe-4.0 固态硬盘的最大传输速率高达 5 GB/s，即使在较长时间的负载情况下，其性能也完全保持稳定。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Ryzen 7 8845HS 的 Radeon 780M与去年的 Ryzen 7000 代相比没有变化。iGPU 的性能非常出色，但在合成测试中，英特尔的新 Arc iGPU 稍微快一些。在游戏基准测试中，这一优势不复存在，英特尔新 GPU 有时仍会出现一些驱动程序问题。不过 Yoga Pro 7配备了速度更快的 8 核图形处理器的 Yoga Pro 7在我们的测试设备中略微领先于 Radeon 780M。
它的游戏性能总体不错，至少可以在 1080p 下流畅地玩《赛博朋克 2077》等当前流行的低细节游戏。另一方面，许多其他要求不高的游戏甚至可以在中高细节设置下进行，此外，即使在长时间的游戏过程中，它的游戏性能也能保持完全稳定。在电池使用情况下，其图形性能也不会降低。更多基准测试请访问。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13199 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7884 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3190 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (302 - 548, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (336 - 1548, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (305 - 503, n=33) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1176 - 1237, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
* ... smaller is better
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.01 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.24 - 50.1, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 149.8 | 135.9 | 68.5 | 27.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 157 | 50 | 30.5 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 134.8 | 110.5 | 88.2 | 76.8 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78.4 | 38.7 | 28.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53.1 | 37.8 | 31 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 78 | 48 | 45 | 42 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 170.5 | 68.2 | 58.1 | 48.1 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 81.2 | 72.4 | 52.7 | 12.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 42.4 | 33.1 | 25 | 20.4 |
排放 - 负载时声音很大
噪音排放
在空闲模式和低负载情况下，测试设备经常保持完全静音，但在高负载情况下，我们不得不对智能冷却配置文件提出批评。在 CPU 高负载、游戏和压力测试时，设备的噪音很快就达到了 41-44 dB(A)。当然，你可以清楚地听到，但与最高性能（最高 46 分贝（A））相比，其差异很小。我们希望两者之间能有更好的区分，智能散热的目标值为 38-40dB(A)。因此，我们建议在日常使用中使用省电模式，因为这样风扇的温度会大大降低。我们没有注意到测试设备发出任何额外的电子噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 44.3 / 44.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Arc 7-Cores, Ultra 5 125H, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X113N | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y Vega 8, R7 7730U, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -6% | 21% | -1% | -0% | |
| off / environment * | 23.9 | 23.8 -0% | 24 -0% | 19.35 19% | 22.6 5% | 24 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 23.9 -0% | 25 -5% | 20.57 14% | 22.6 5% | 25 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 23.9 | 24 -0% | 26 -9% | 20.57 14% | 22.6 5% | 27 -13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.9 | 27.9 -17% | 31 -30% | 20.57 14% | 22.6 5% | 30 -26% |
| Load Average * | 44.3 | 35.9 19% | 43 3% | 32.18 27% | 40.7 8% | 36 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.3 | 42.1 -2% | 40 3% | 29.44 29% | 46.6 -13% | 38 8% |
| Load Maximum * | 44.3 | 42.7 4% | 45 -2% | 32.26 27% | 52.5 -19% | 38 14% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在小负载和压力测试期间，笔记本电脑的表面温度从未达到任何临界值，最高温度低于 40 °C，风扇实际上甚至可以稍微慢一点转动。当然，这丝毫不会对运行产生负面影响，即使在高负载情况下，你也可以把设备放在大腿上。在压力测试中，处理器首先使用了 60 瓦的功率，1.5 分钟后，它消耗了 54 瓦的功率，然后 TDP 平衡在 49 瓦。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.5 °C / 81.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | -11% | -9% | -12% | -6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39.6 | 32.2 19% | 43 -9% | 36.6 8% | 39.4 1% | 43 -9% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 38.6 | 39 -1% | 48 -24% | 37.2 4% | 43.2 -12% | 42 -9% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 24.8 | 24.2 2% | 26 -5% | 31.6 -27% | 28.6 -15% | 25 -1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.3 | 25.6 -1% | 27 -7% | 30 -19% | 30.6 -21% | 26 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
IdeaPad Pro 5 14 配备了两个扬声器，其质量比 IdeaPad Slim 5 内的扬声器好得多。 IdeaPad Slim 5不过，与更昂贵的多媒体笔记本电脑（如 Yoga Pro 7.它的音效根本没有 Yoga 那么震撼和立体。
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - IdeaPad 的强劲动力
耗电量
OLED 笔记本电脑的耗电量自然也取决于所显示的内容，因此我们建议使用深色背景。游戏时，它的功耗约为 75 瓦，而在压力测试中，我们注意到最大功耗略低于 90 瓦（进一步测试时约为 80 瓦）。因此，随机提供的 100 瓦电源装置已足够使用。
| Off / Standby | 0.49 / 0.52 Watt |
| Idle | 5.3 / 7.2 / 7.5 Watt |
| Load |
65.6 / 89.6 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, , OLED, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Cores, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X113N, OLED, 1920x1200, 14.00 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | -7% | 5% | -12% | 1% | -10% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.3 | 3.4 36% | 5 6% | 6.7 -26% | 7.9 -49% | 4 25% | 6.37 ? -20% | 4.86 ? 8% |
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 5.5 24% | 8 -11% | 7.16 1% | 8.8 -22% | 5.5 24% | 8.59 ? -19% | 8.31 ? -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 12.4 -65% | 16 -113% | 11.17 -49% | 14.7 -96% | 11.8 -57% | 11.3 ? -51% | 10.4 ? -39% |
| Load Average * | 65.6 | 49.8 24% | 53 19% | 46.5 29% | 46.9 29% | 66 -1% | 52.8 ? 20% | 46.3 ? 29% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 73 | 44.6 39% | 47.7 35% | 37.2 49% | 44.9 38% | 55 25% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 89.6 | 65.3 27% | 70 22% | 64.36 28% | 65.2 27% | 100 -12% | 73.6 ? 18% | 66.7 ? 26% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
IdeaPad Pro 5 14 的电池容量为 84 瓦时，在我们的对比组中是最大的，其电池运行时间总体上也非常出色。在 150 cd/m²（相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 65%）的 WLAN 测试中，我们在 60 Hz 下测得 11:50 小时，在 120 Hz 下测得 10:15 小时。在全屏亮度下，其运行时间缩短为 08:44 小时（60 Hz）和 7:48 小时（120 Hz）。在 150 cd/m² 的视频测试中，我们注意到其运行时间超过了 17 小时，在全亮度条件下播放 HDR 视频的时间为 05:53。在负载情况下，电池可在 110 分钟内耗尽，电池电量从 20% 下降到 20%。开机后，从零开始充电需要 98 分钟，54 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。总的来说，结果非常好。
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 65 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Cores, 57 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 73 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -32% | -23% | -25% | 44% | -4% | -10% | |
| H.264 | 1031 | 720 -30% | 794 ? -23% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 710 | 508 -28% | 544 -23% | 578 -19% | 725 2% | 680 -4% | 629 ? -11% |
| Load | 110 | 70 -36% | 203 85% | 115.4 ? 5% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - AMD型号的IdeaPad Pro以其良好的性价比给人留下了深刻印象
在我们的测试中，新款联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G9 给我们留下了深刻印象，尤其是它的高性能和稳定性。新款 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 运行速度非常快，甚至超过了 Yoga Pro 7 中运行的新款 Core Ultra 7 155H，后者的功耗限制略高。IdeaPad Pro 也采用了新的英特尔芯片，其性能也非常出色--不过，由于价格更低（差价约 200 美元），AMD 型号显然是更合理的选择。我们只是希望在能源配置文件智能冷却和最高性能之间能有更大的差距。得益于 84 瓦时的大容量电池，这款笔记本电脑的运行时间也令人印象深刻。
主观而言，它的 OLED 显示屏非常漂亮，明显优于同价位的 IPS 面板。如果将该设备与较大的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16（2.5K IPS，120 Hz）进行比较，就能很好地看出这一点。不过，情况并不尽如人意，因为联想没有提供任何具有 P3 或 sRGB 精确色彩的配置文件，这意味着该面板并不完全适合编辑照片。它更适合观看视频和玩游戏，快速的响应时间也是一个优势。
联想将新款 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 的重点放在了性能和显示质量上，其中 AMD 版采用了新款 Ryzen 7 8845HS，性价比特别高。
在外壳方面，你不得不做出一些妥协，虽然它是由铝合金制成的，但与 Yoga 机型相比，你确实会发现质量上的差异。键盘也是如此，略显粗糙。另一方面，我们对这款笔记本的连接选项没有任何负面评价，包括现代标准的 USB 4.0 和 HDMI 2.1-plus，甚至还安装了全功能读卡器。另外一个缺点是它的内置内存，因此我们直接建议购买 32GB 内存，因为这个版本的价格只比 16GB 内存的贵 60 美元左右。笔记本 Yoga Pro 7 14的价格要高出不少，约为 1,630 美元，而其他对比设备包括 Yoga Slim 7性能较差，运行时间往往较短。
价格和供应情况
IdeaPad Pro 5 14 目前尚未在美国上市，但一旦上市，你将可以直接从联想公司配置和订购所需的机型。我们的测试机售价约为 1,300 美元。
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
-
03/20/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
