Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 评测--配备 AMD Zen4 和 120Hz 显示屏的 Linux 超极本
Tuxedo 新推出的 Pulse 14 Gen3 依赖 AMD 当前的 Zen4 处理器,从而扩大了其 14 英寸紧凑型笔记本电脑产品组合。处理器 Ryzen 7 7840HS处理器,包括快速的 Radeon 780M iGPU以及 32GB LPDDR5-6400 内存和刷新率为 120Hz 的高分辨率 3K IPS 显示屏。配备三星 500GB 固态硬盘的基本售价约为 1,320 美元,而我们测试配置的 2-TB 版本三星 980 Pro 售价约为 1,500 美元。就价格而言,新款 Pulse 14 Gen3 仅低于著名的 InfinityBook Pro 14 Gen8(Linux 版本的 申克 Vision 14 M23GeForce 价格从 1700 美元起)。除了基于 Linux 的 Tuxedo 操作系统外,Pulse 14 Gen3 还可以配置 Windows(虚拟机或双启动)。
此外,您还可以从申克公司购买一款配置相同的 Windows 版本,名为Via 14 Pro ,其 MRSP 略低,为 1,200 美元(保修期缩短为 2 年,您甚至可以以 1,110 美元的价格购买)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89 % | 01/2024 | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.9 % | 10/2023 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.2 % | 01/2024 | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
12/2023 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | ||
88.6 % | 01/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
87.8 % | 11/2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.5 % | 10/2023 | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - Pulse 14 采用铝质/塑料外壳
乍一看,新款 Pulse 14 Gen3 的外壳与 InfinityBook 或 Vision 14 非常相似。 14但仔细观察,你会发现其中有一些不同之处。价格昂贵的 InfinityBook 采用镁合金材料,重量仅略高于 1.3 千克(即使使用 99 瓦时电池),而 Pulse 14 Gen3 的外壳则由铝合金(显示屏盖和外壳下部)和塑料(外壳上部和显示屏边框)制成。就质量而言,这款笔记本电脑给人的印象相当不错,不过,其铝制表面尤其容易留下指纹印,而且也不是最容易清除的。遗憾的是,该设备没有银色版本。黑色版本的 Vision 14 则更容易保持清洁。新款 Pulse 14 可以选择在盖子上不印制制造商的徽标,也可以选择印制定制的徽标(甚至是彩色徽标)。
底座的稳定性很好,我们在使用较大的压力时才会压到中间的键盘区域。屏幕的柔韧性稍差,但我们无法从屏幕上看到任何图像错误。它的最大开启角度是 180 度,总的来说,铰链设置得很好,但在设置到不同角度后,显示屏会有一些晃动。值得庆幸的是,这个问题不像 InfinityBook/Vision 14 那样明显。
新款 Pulse 14 是同类产品中最小巧的设备之一,重 1.39 千克。这使得它比旧款 InfinityBook 略重。其 100 瓦电源重 265 克。
连接性 - Tuxedo 没有使用 USB 4.0
尽管体积小巧,但 Pulse 14 Gen3 并不缺乏连接选项,因为除了总共 4 个 USB(2 个 USB-C 和 2 个 USB-A)外,它还具有完整的 HDMI 输出和 microSD 读卡器。这意味着在日常使用中,你可能不需要随身携带适配器。另一方面,它没有现代的 USB-4.0 端口。
SD 读卡器
设备右侧有一个 microSD 读卡器(弹簧装置),可惜只能通过 USB 2.0 连接。结合我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60),我们测得的传输速率约为 20 MB/s。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 193.9, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23.6 - 239, n=17, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 |
交流
我们的测试设备采用了联发科的 WLAN 模块(MT9721K),它可能支持现代 Wi-Fi 6E 网络(6 GHz),但其运行频率仅为 80 MHz。这意味着它的最大传输速率被限制在 1,200 MBit/s,这也是我们的测试结果相对较差的原因。您可以选择英特尔的 AX210 显卡。尽管如此,在日常使用中,它的无线局域网性能绝对够快、够稳定。
Networking | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
网络摄像头
笔记本电脑的网络摄像头只使用了 720p 传感器,即使在光线充足的条件下,效果也不是特别好。此外,由于摄像头旁边的绿色状态 LED 灯非常亮,在照片中总是略微可见。此外,它还配备了一个红外摄像头,可使用 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。
维护
底盖由普通十字螺丝固定,可以轻松取下。在内部,你可以看到两个风扇以及两个用于 M.2-2280 SSD 的插槽。除此之外,还可以更换 WLAN 模块和电池。不过,内存是焊接上去的。
保修
Pulse 14 Gen3 标配两年保修。您只需支付额外费用,即可将保修期延长至 5 年。
输入设备 - 舒适且发光
Pulse 14 的黑色键盘很容易让人联想起 14的黑色键盘,手感舒适,按键精准。除了大空格键外,键盘还非常安静。不过,它的布局并不理想,因为右上角的电源键与键盘融为一体,这意味着它很容易与 "删除 "键混淆。键盘采用白色背光,有两种亮度设置,但不是通过传感器自动设置的。
点击板(12.5 x 6.5 厘米)光滑细腻,运行良好,但其 "咔嗒咔嗒 "声有点大。因此,我们建议只用点击键盘输入。与键盘相比,点击板的质量不如 InfinityBook 好(而且更小)。
显示屏 - 3K IPS,刷新率为 120 赫兹
就其规格而言,哑光 3K IPS 显示屏明显让人联想到以前的 InfinityBook 或 14但现在频率从 90 Hz 提高到了 120 Hz。其他规格(2,880 x 1,800 像素分辨率、16:10 宽高比)也完全相同。我们注意到的一个变化是,亮度较高的区域看起来有点颗粒感。此外,我们还注意到显示屏底部边缘有一些细微的光晕。它没有亮度传感器。
Tuxedo 表示亮度至少为 300 cd/m²,而实际上,我们测试设备的平均亮度约为 340 cd/m²。其黑色值仅为 0.16 cd/m²,对比度超过 2,000:1。由于没有使用 PWM,它的反应速度可能不是最快的,但也不算太离谱。
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 340 cd/m²
Contrast: 2125:1 (Black: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
73.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 CSOT T3 MNE007ZA1-3, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.50 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 25% | 1% | 24% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71.1 | 74.7 5% | 99.75 40% | 72.3 2% | 99.8 40% | 69 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.7 | 99.6 1% | 99.99 1% | 99.7 1% | 100 1% | 99.1 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.2 | 75.8 4% | 98.56 35% | 73.4 0% | 95.8 31% | 71.1 -3% |
Response Times | 24% | 70% | -19% | 97% | -35% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.9 ? | 32.2 ? 15% | 2.2 ? 94% | 43.6 ? -15% | 0.82 ? 98% | 50.4 ? -33% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23.1 ? | 15.4 ? 33% | 12.8 ? 45% | 28.2 ? -22% | 0.95 ? 96% | 31.5 ? -36% |
PWM Frequency | 300 | 504.7 ? | ||||
Screen | -8% | -29% | -9% | -14% | -12% | |
Brightness middle | 340 | 402 18% | 388 14% | 357 5% | 384 13% | 436 28% |
Brightness | 338 | 371 10% | 391 16% | 348 3% | 386 14% | 416 23% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 86 2% | 98 17% | 88 5% | 98 17% | 89 6% |
Black Level * | 0.16 | 0.27 -69% | 0.0411 74% | 0.22 -38% | 0.36 -125% | |
Contrast | 2125 | 1489 -30% | 9440 344% | 1623 -24% | 1211 -43% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.8 -6% | 6.32 -272% | 2 -18% | 4.06 -139% | 1.81 -6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 3.6 -20% | 8.82 -194% | 3.8 -27% | 6.73 -124% | 4.73 -58% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 1.5 -15% | 4.79 -268% | 1.2 8% | 0.49 62% | 0.45 65% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 1.8 38% | 2.61 10% | 2.7 7% | 1.1 62% | 2.9 -0% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% | 1.772 124% | 2.15 102% | 2.26 97% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6729 97% | 6695 97% | 6202 105% | 6929 94% | 6331 103% | 6784 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
-1% | 22% /
-3% | -9% /
-8% | 36% /
14% | -16% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)对面板进行了分析,开箱即用,显示效果非常好。在灰色调方面,可能会有轻微的绿色/蓝色色调,但在日常使用中您可能不会注意到这一点。色彩保持在最重要的 3 色以下,你不一定需要校准屏幕。尽管如此,我们还是进行了尝试(我们的配置文件可在上面免费下载),尤其是灰色调的描绘得到了改善。Pulse 14 几乎全面覆盖了 sRGB,非常适合编辑图片/视频。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.4 ms rise | |
↘ 11.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.4 ms rise | |
↘ 20.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
在室外,雾面 IPS 面板的表现非常出色,只需避免阳光直射即可。它的视角稳定性很好,只有对角线以上的角度偶尔会导致对比度明显下降,但这在日常使用中不会有太大影响。
性能 - AMD Zen4 和 32 GB 内存
Pulse 14 只配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS及其集成的 Radeon 780M显卡以及 32GB LPDDR5-6400 内存。交货范围包括所有 Windows 驱动程序,即使您没有同时订购 Windows 安装程序。
测试条件
Tuxedo 在其预装的控制中心中提供了不同的性能配置文件,默认情况下,配置文件Tuxedo Defaults已被激活。为了更好地将这款笔记本与我们数据库中的其他 Windows 设备进行比较,我们使用额外安装的 Windows 版本(11 Home)进行了以下基准测试和测量。在性能、功耗或风扇性能方面,我们没有发现两个操作系统之间有什么不同。
处理器 - Ryzen 7 7840HS
......(英文 Ryzen 7 7840HSRyzen 7 7840HS 配备 8 个快速 Zen4 内核(16 个线程),主频最高可达 5.1 GHz。在 Pulse 14 中,处理器的功耗在短时间内达到 65 瓦,几秒钟后又平衡到 45 瓦。这使得它的多核性能非常出色,与新的 酷睿至尊 7 155H内的 宏碁 Swift Go 14不过,Pulse 14 的性能也几乎完全稳定,即使在长期负载的情况下也是如此。此外,它的单核性能与新的流星湖酷睿至睿 7 155H 不相上下,后者的性能略低于旧的猛禽湖芯片。
在电池使用情况下,该处理器最多只能使用 28 瓦的功率,这就是为什么在没有插座的情况下,其多核性能要差 18%。更多 CPU 基准测试 这里。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (15515 - 17214, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1737 - 1812, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6061 - 6744, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (661 - 705, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2473 - 2729, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (270 - 286, n=15) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (185 - 229, n=17) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (59538 - 73035, n=17) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6049 - 6754, n=17) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8446 - 12339, n=19) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1837 - 2017, n=19) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (11.7 - 21.8, n=17) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (38.3 - 68.3, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (0.4184 - 0.4739, n=17) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (24712 - 28921, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (103755 - 123167, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (4293 - 5096, n=17) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (105028 - 122681, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (14385 - 15525, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (55540 - 65812, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (67389 - 177158, n=17) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (949 - 1123, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13100 - 15599, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17615 - 41157, n=17) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U |
系统性能
主观而言,Pulse 14 的性能非常出色,它确实是一款反应迅速的笔记本电脑。它的基准测试结果也非常出色,我们在测试过程中没有遇到任何操作系统问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7039 - 7651, n=7) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10519 - 11214, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9717 - 10970, n=7) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9052 - 9987, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1566 - 1873, n=7) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1535 - 1816, n=7) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1556 - 2040, n=7) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1293 - 1706, n=7) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (297 - 339, n=7) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (119.2 - 448, n=63, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (248 - 319, n=6) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (67.2 - 325, n=50, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1913, n=67, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (485 - 544, n=7) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7428 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30937 - 72158, n=17) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30497 - 61911, n=17) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (34590 - 93323, n=17) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (85.1 - 112, n=17) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Pulse 14 有两个用于单面固态硬盘的快速 PCIe-4.0-x4 插槽。基本型号配备了 500GB 的三星 980,不过我们的测试设备配备了 2TB 版本的三星 980 Pro(附加费约为 170 美元)。目前,它可以容纳 2 个固态硬盘,每个最大容量为 4 TB。980 Pro 的性能非常出色,即使在长期负载的情况下,它也能保持完全稳定--这并不总是必然的。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Pulse 14 没有提供专用显卡,而是使用处理器集成的 Radeon-780M GPU进行图形计算。当然,它也得益于内存的双通道配置。iGPU 的性能非常出色,但新的 Arc iGPU(8 核)至少在合成基准测试中略胜一筹。不过,在游戏测试中,Radeon 780M 的优势并不明显。许多游戏都能以 1080p 的分辨率和高细节运行,只有在运行要求非常苛刻的游戏时,才需要降低一点期望值。当然,如果你想经常玩游戏,dGPU 仍然是一个更可行的选择。
在长期负载情况下,其性能完全保持稳定--无论是在合成 3DMark 压力测试中还是在我们的 Witcher 3 长期测试中也是如此。在电池模式下,纯 GPU 性能降低了约 8%。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里。
3DMark 11 Performance | 13338 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7923 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3380 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (53 - 72, n=3, last 2 years) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (91 - 115, n=3, last 2 years) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (336 - 1548, n=54, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (305 - 503, n=33) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5.01 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 153.7 | 141.5 | 67.7 | 27.1 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 160 | 50 | 30.2 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 141.3 | 117.9 | 94.8 | 85.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 81.9 | 39.3 | 29.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 58.6 | 43.1 | 35.4 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 78 | 51 | 47 | 45 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 168.4 | 67.8 | 57.8 | 49.6 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 223 | 115 | 87.1 | 36 |
F1 22 (2022) | 98.8 | 89.8 | 66.6 | 17.9 |
F1 23 (2023) | 92.1 | 83.1 | 59.8 | 13.9 |
排放 - 带有两个风扇的 Pulse 14
噪音排放
Pulse 14 配备了两个风扇,这的确是一款非常安静的笔记本电脑。即使使用最佳性能模式,风扇在空闲模式和要求不高的任务中也经常保持完全关闭状态。如果周围真的很安静,你只会注意到非常细微的呼呼声(约 25 dB(A))。在使用最高性能模式时,我们测得的最大分贝为 37 dB(A),考虑到它的性能表现,这已经相当不错了,而且它比 Vision 14的明显优势。我们没有注意到测试设备发出任何额外的电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 23.5 / 25.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.4 / 37.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.5 dB(A) |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -13% | -16% | -9% | -11% | -4% | -8% | |
off / environment * | 23.5 | 24.5 -4% | 23.5 -0% | 25 -6% | 24.3 -3% | 23.4 -0% | 22.6 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 24.5 -4% | 23.5 -0% | 25 -6% | 24.3 -3% | 24.1 -3% | 22.6 4% |
Idle Average * | 23.5 | 24.5 -4% | 23.5 -0% | 25 -6% | 24.3 -3% | 24.1 -3% | 22.6 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.1 | 30.4 -21% | 26 -4% | 26.2 -4% | 27.9 -11% | 25.3 -1% | 24.2 4% |
Load Average * | 32.4 | 39.5 -22% | 43.6 -35% | 35.7 -10% | 36.7 -13% | 33.4 -3% | 35.8 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.9 | 41.7 -19% | 48.7 -40% | 44.2 -27% | 39.4 -13% | 46.5 -33% | |
Load Maximum * | 37.3 | 44.9 -20% | 49.1 -32% | 45.5 -22% | 44.2 -18% | 39.4 -6% | 48.9 -31% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲模式和执行非常简单的任务时,机箱几乎不会发热,即使在运行游戏或进行压力测试时,我们也注意到机箱底部中间部分的最高温度为 45 °C。这是完全没有问题的,在使用过程中,你可以放心地将笔记本电脑放在大腿上。键盘的最高发热温度约为 40 °C,虽然你在打字时会注意到这一点,但它绝对不会妨碍你的工作。在压力测试中,处理器在短时间内的功耗为 65 瓦,然后在剩余时间内的功耗为 45 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | -13% | -10% | -6% | 6% | -10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.5 | 45.8 -10% | 48.5 -17% | 36.5 12% | 42.1 -1% | 39 6% | 42 -1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.7 | 42 8% | 52.8 -16% | 49.5 -8% | 49.7 -9% | 35.8 22% | 47.4 -4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.7 | 27.5 -11% | 27.6 -12% | 25.5 -3% | 25.7 -4% | 25.2 -2% | 28.8 -17% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.9 | 27.1 -9% | 27 -8% | 35 -41% | 27.3 -10% | 25.6 -3% | 29.6 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个扬声器发出的声音都很一般,而且功率也不大。对于会议或背景音乐,它们可能已经足够好了,但即便如此,我们还是建议连接耳机或外置扬声器,以获得更好的声音体验。
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 良好的运行时间
耗电量
Pulse 14 配备了高分辨率 120 赫兹显示屏,但并不是最高效的笔记本电脑,空闲模式下的耗电量高达 9.7 瓦。这比同类产品高出很多,尽管它们有时更亮。在最大负载情况下,我们测得几秒钟内的最大功率为 101 瓦,后来平衡为 75 瓦。因此,100 瓦的电源已经足够。另一方面,它在待机模式或关机状态下的功耗接近 1 瓦,有点高。
Off / Standby | 0.86 / 0.97 Watt |
Idle | 5.6 / 9.2 / 9.7 Watt |
Load |
65.2 / 101 Watt |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.50 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50 | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 26% | -6% | 3% | 3% | 17% | 31% | 5% | 16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.6 | 4.2 25% | 5.2 7% | 5.5 2% | 5.6 -0% | 6 -7% | 4 29% | 6.37 ? -14% | 4.86 ? 13% |
Idle Average * | 9.2 | 7.4 20% | 7.8 15% | 10.1 -10% | 8.8 4% | 6.5 29% | 6.5 29% | 8.59 ? 7% | 8.31 ? 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.7 | 8 18% | 9 7% | 11.2 -15% | 9 7% | 13.9 -43% | 6.8 30% | 11.3 ? -16% | 10.4 ? -7% |
Load Average * | 65.2 | 42.8 34% | 78.6 -21% | 45.9 30% | 58.5 10% | 41.9 36% | 48 26% | 52.8 ? 19% | 46.3 ? 29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 70 | 47.9 32% | 86.8 -24% | 60.9 13% | 71 -1% | 43.9 37% | 52.3 25% | ||
Load Maximum * | 101 | 76 25% | 121.2 -20% | 104.1 -3% | 100.6 -0% | 50.8 50% | 55.2 45% | 73.6 ? 27% | 66.7 ? 34% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
这款笔记本电脑的电池容量为 60 瓦时,与配备 99 瓦时大容量电池的 InfinityBook 或 Vision 14 相比要差很多。即便如此,它的运行时间仍然非常出色,在我们使用 150 cd/m² 的适应亮度(测试设备最大亮度的 46%)进行的测试中,该设备在 60 Hz 的 WLAN 测试中持续了 10 分 20 秒,在 120 Hz 的测试中持续了 8 分 49 秒。在全亮度条件下,刷新率不再有任何影响,因为两次 WLAN 测试都持续了 6:36 小时。在视频测试中,我们注意到运行时间约为 10 小时。
在设备开启的情况下,一次完全充电大约需要 108 分钟,大约一小时后,80% 的电量已充满。在测试期间,发布了一个新的 BIOS 更新,可以设置电池充电的下限和上限。
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 99 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 65 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 73 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 61 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 33% | 17% | -10% | 14% | 26% | 17% | 31% | |
H.264 | 595 | 737 24% | 794 ? 33% | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 620 | 823 33% | 723 17% | 479 -23% | 618 0% | 510 -18% | 726 17% | 629 ? 1% |
Load | 72 | 74 3% | 86 19% | 122 69% | 115.4 ? 60% |
Pros
Cons
评语 - Pulse 14 Gen3 的出色性能和显示效果令人印象深刻
Tuxedo 的新款 Pulse 14(以及申克的新款 Via 14 Pro)是一款有趣的 14 英寸子笔记本电脑,配备快速的 AMD Zen4 处理器。其总体性能优于价格更高的 InfinityBook 或配备酷睿 i7-13700H 的 Vision 14,尤其是在集成显卡方面。此外,它标配 32GB 内存,这意味着它可以从众多竞争对手中脱颖而出,但同时,它的内存是焊接的,不能扩展。
它的哑光 3K IPS 显示屏在没有 PWM 的情况下也能呈现良好的主观画质,继续给人留下深刻印象。此外,它还能非常准确地描绘色彩,刷新率也提高到了 120 Hz。它的散热装置有两个风扇,能很好地处理 AMD 处理器,总的来说,Pulse 14 比我们之前测试过的 iGPU 版本的 Vision 14 要安静得多。其出色的键盘在未做任何改动的情况下得到了采用。
新款 Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 是一款功能强大的 14 英寸子笔记本,配备了 AMD Zen4 处理器、32 GB 内存和高分辨率 120-Hz IPS 显示屏。遗憾的是,一些地方(网络摄像头、读卡器、无 USB 4.0)暴露了为了尽可能降低价格而进行的削减。
有几项功能暴露了这款笔记本电脑的低价,而有几项功能尤其显示出了削减的痕迹,包括网络摄像头(包括状态指示灯投射出的令人讨厌的绿色色调)、microSD 读卡器、普通扬声器和缺少 USB 4.0 支持。你必须自己决定这些东西对你来说有多重要。如果你能接受这些缺点,那么你将得到的仍然是一台速度超快、配备良好的 IPS 显示屏和 32 GB 内存的超小型笔记本电脑。此外,由于配备了第二个 PCIe-4.0 插槽,该设备的固态硬盘容量可以轻松(廉价)扩展。尽管有前面提到的缺点,但新款 Pulse 14 Gen3 的优点明显占大多数,因此获得了 89% 的高分。Pulse 14 Gen3 的价格从 1,300 美元起,但如果你只想使用 Windows 系统,那么你可以花 1110 多美元买到配置相同的申克 Via 14 Pro。
价格和供应情况
新型 Pulse 14 Gen3 可直接从Tuxedo Computers 购买。购买,价格约为 1,300 美元起。与之相同的 Windows 版本申克 Via 14 Pro 可从Bestware 购买。-价格从 1,110 美元起。
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
-
01/20/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.