结论 - 比 NucBox K11 更大,但功能比它多一些
NucBox K12 比 NucBox K11因此它自然而然地增加了一些有用的功能,包括一个额外的 M.2 固态硬盘插槽、额外的集成端口和一个控制 RGB LED 的专用按钮。它的 120 W 交流适配器也比以前更小、更紧凑。
不过,除了上述变化外,NucBox K12 的性能与前代产品大致相同。尽管物理尺寸更大,但它甚至没有提供集成扬声器或更安静的风扇。可维护性也可以变得更简单。
Pros
Cons
NucBox K12 是 NucBox K11 的升级版。 NucBox K11的升级版,采用了更新的 AMD CPU 和全新的机箱设计。与前代产品一样,K12 的目标用户是专业人士或企业用户,他们可以利用 OcuLink 和各种集成端口。
我们的测试机配备了 32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD,除了 Ryzen 7 H 255,目前没有其他 CPU 可供选择。
该领域的竞争对手包括其他专业微型 PC,如 微星 Cubi 系列, 华硕 ExpertCenter 系列或 博弈 M 系列.
更多 GMKtec 评论:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
与即将推出的 NucBox K11 和许多其他迷你电脑相比,新设计明显更大更重。反过来,K12 采用了更小的 120 W 交流适配器(约 9.8 x 6.2 x 2.4 厘米)和额外的内部存储选项。
该机型新增了顶部的 "风扇模式 "按钮,可在预设数量的 RGB 效果中循环切换。按住该按钮可关闭 RGB 灯光,这解决了我们对 EVO-X1 和 NucBox K11 上 RGB 效果的最大不满之一。除此之外,该按钮对系统性能没有任何影响。
连接性
该型号继承了 NucBox K11 上的所有端口,包括 OcuLink 端口以及额外的 USB-A 和音频插孔端口。
交流
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
维护
可持续性
制造商没有提到生产过程中使用了回收材料。零售包装盒由纸和硬纸板组成,外加塑料包装。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括一个可拆卸的 VESA 安装支架和一根 HDMI 线缆。如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为默认的平衡模式。
处理器
尽管 Ryzen 7 H 255虽然相对较新,但 CPU 仍基于上一代 Zen 4 架构,没有集成 NPU,使用的是较老的 RDNA3 iGPU,而不是 RDNA3.5。因此,原始性能与两年前的 Ryzen 7 7840HS的速度慢 20% 到 25%。 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.就所有意图和目的而言,它本质上就是一款改头换面的 Ryzen 7 7840HS。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (15871 - 16402, n=2) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (1697 - 1718, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (6255 - 6480, n=2) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER8 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (660 - 677, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (2514 - 2588, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (266 - 276, n=2) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (194 - 203, n=2) | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK EVO-X2 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (6237 - 6261, n=2) | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER8 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (12515 - 12825, n=2) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (2545 - 2546, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (11604 - 11614, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (1810 - 1880, n=2) | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (19.9 - 20.4, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (51 - 51.4, n=2) | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (0.4587 - 0.503, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK EVO-X2 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (25404 - 26120, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (104302 - 106590, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (4604 - 4764, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (111673 - 115748, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (14626 - 15123, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (56019 - 57378, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (83999 - 86090, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (1036 - 1066, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (13694 - 13941, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (40115 - 41649, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (6907 - 6959, n=2) | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (10377 - 10502, n=2) | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (9325 - 9440, n=2) | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (9227 - 9243, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (1769 - 1791, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (1709 - 1733, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (1887 - 1895, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (1617 - 1666, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (290 - 300, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 245, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M (566 - 577, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6959 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (67673 - 74184, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (58305 - 61129, n=2) | |
Beelink SER9 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (85497 - 106026, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 (93.7 - 103.9, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了相同的 1 TB Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8NVMe 固态硬盘,与许多其他迷你 PC 上的固态硬盘相同,包括 Beelink SER9 Pro或 Minisforum EliteMini AI370。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
集成的 Radeon 780M比旧版本的 Radeon 680M快约 10%至 15%,而较新的 Radeon 890M.不过,尽管设置较低,它仍足以在 900p 至 1080p 下运行最新的游戏。
3DMark 11 Performance | 13189 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37614 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7755 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3215 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 -1! | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 -1! | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK NucBox K12 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K11 | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (43.3 - 94.8, n=25) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (36.4 - 80.2, n=26) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (23.3 - 59.9, n=26) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K12 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (6.39 - 14.5, n=16) |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 164.9 | 154.4 | 65 | 27.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 154 | 108.9 | 93.2 | 81.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78.4 | 39.1 | 27.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 61.1 | 45.3 | 38 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 168.5 | 67.1 | 56.5 | 49.5 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.9 | 32.9 | 27 | 26.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 43.5 | 33.9 | 27.1 | 23.6 |
F1 24 (2024) | 83.4 | 73.3 | 55.4 | 12.3 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 35.4 / 35.4 / 39 dB(A) |
Load |
| 42.4 / 41.4 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | GMK NucBox K11 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Lexar NQ7A1 | Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 13% | 5% | 15% | 4% | 6% | |
off / environment * (dB) | 23.5 | 24 -2% | 23.3 1% | 23 2% | 24.8 -6% | 24.8 -6% |
Idle Minimum * (dB) | 35.4 | 25.2 29% | 27.8 21% | 29.1 18% | 25.4 28% | 25 29% |
Idle Average * (dB) | 35.4 | 30.2 15% | 30.3 14% | 30.1 15% | 25.4 28% | 25.1 29% |
Idle Maximum * (dB) | 39 | 30.2 23% | 30.4 22% | 31.7 19% | 25.5 35% | 29.1 25% |
Load Average * (dB) | 42.4 | 36.4 14% | 44.6 -5% | 33.7 21% | 49.8 -17% | 47 -11% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 40.4 | 36.6 9% | 44.2 -9% | 33.8 16% | 49.6 -23% | 44 -9% |
Load Maximum * (dB) | 41.4 | 39 6% | 46.1 -11% | 35.2 15% | 49.8 -20% | 47.1 -14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 49.7 |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 将稳定在 3.9 GHz、54 W 和 78 C。当运行《赛博朋克 2077》来代表典型的游戏负载时,集成图形处理器的频率稳定在 2550 MHz,温度为 70 C,这与我们在较小的 NucBox K11.
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | 800 | 36 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.9 | -- | 78 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 3.9 | 2171 | 70 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.1 | 2550 | 70 |
能源管理
耗电量
对于 Zen 4 CPU 而言,每瓦性能还算不错,但与较新的 Zen 5 CPU 相比,则相对较差。禅思 GMK EVO-X1为例,它的速度更快,要求更低,是一种明显更省电的选择。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | GMK NucBox K11 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Lexar NQ7A1, , x, | Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 9% | 29% | 22% | 26% | 32% | |
Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 9.9 | 6.6 33% | 5.4 45% | 7 29% | 2.4 76% | 3.4 66% |
Idle Average * (Watt) | 10.1 | 9.1 10% | 5.8 43% | 7.1 30% | 4.6 54% | 4.9 51% |
Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 13.1 | 11.3 14% | 5.8 56% | 7.5 43% | 9.2 30% | 7.4 44% |
Load Average * (Watt) | 69.8 | 76.8 -10% | 72.1 -3% | 62.3 11% | 78.4 -12% | 70.7 -1% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 86.3 | 83 4% | 72.5 16% | 80.1 7% | 77.8 10% | 69.6 19% |
Load Maximum * (Watt) | 92.8 | 88 5% | 76.1 18% | 82.9 11% | 95.1 -2% | 82.6 11% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
笔记本检查评级
与 NucBox K11 相比,NucBox K12 增加了更多功能,但原始性能几乎保持不变。
GMK NucBox K12
- 09/26/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $749.99 | 938 g | 78 mm | x | |
GMK NucBox K11 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $849.99 List Price: 600 USD | 630 g | 58 mm | x | |
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,049.99 List Price: 900 USD | 595 g | 63.2 mm | x | |
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $649.00 List Price: 520 USD | 812 g | 44.7 mm | x | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $999.00 List Price: 999€ | 709 g | 46.9 mm | x | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $44.99 PowerHOOD 19V AC/DC Adapter ... 2. $47.28 Kircuit 19V AC/DC Adapter fo... 3. $48.78 Onerbl AC-DC Adapter for Cha... List Price: 1499 EUR | 472 g | 46.9 mm | x |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.