Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarAyaneo Kun 游戏掌上电脑评测：个人主义者的性能野兽
Ayaneo Kun 配备 8.4 英寸显示屏，屏幕对角线略低于 Legion 去.不过，与联想的竞争对手相比，Kun 有一些优势：在我们的数据库中，没有任何一款手持设备拥有如此明亮的屏幕、如此大的电池容量以及如此高的处理器功率。处理器 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U可以在高达 54 瓦的功率下工作。这在许多基准测试中提供了点数提升。不过，我们配备 64 GB 内存和 4 TB NVMe 固态硬盘的顶级设备也有其弱点。尽管如此，这些弱点既不在拇指摇杆或带有霍尔效应传感器的触发器上，也不在其他输入设备上。至于其他手持设备都不具备的薄弱的网络摄像头是否能被视为弱点，也值得商榷。不过，NVMe 固态硬盘过热过快也是一个性能问题。对于至少 1000 欧元的价格来说，Ayaneo 的掌上电脑应该比联想Legion Go 提供更多，后者可能是它的直接竞争对手。
Ayaneo 在最近测试的 Legion Go.Kun仍然是一款经典的掌上电脑，尽管体积异常庞大。其他有趣的竞争者还有 Steam Deck OLED、华硕 ROG Ally、Steam Deck OLED。 华硕 ROG Ally和 Ayaneo Air 1S对于那些想在口袋里装个小得多的设备的人来说，这些都是不错的选择。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.2 % | 01/2024 | Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 942 g | 22 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
| 84.9 % | 01/2024 | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 845 g | 41 mm | 8.80" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.2 % | 10/2023 | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 443.8 g | 21 mm | 5.50" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.5 % | 05/2023 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 611 g | 21.22 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.3 % | 03/2023 | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 607 g | 28 mm | 6.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % | 07/2023 | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 864 g | 23 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
| Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD , | 669 g | 49 mm | 7.00" | 1280x800 |
箱子和设备
Ayaneo Kun 的外壳几乎全部由塑料制成。我们的测试设备采用金属银色涂装，其他设备则采用黑色或白色涂装，并有一些明显更多彩的点缀。Kun 的整体做工精良，具有很高的抗扭刚性。控制器之间的距离为 2.1 厘米，这款大型手持设备甚至比Legion Go 还要纤薄。不过，Ayaneo 手持设备的重量仅有不到 950 克，在重量方面也保持着不太乐观的记录。在我们的数据库中，没有其他掌上电脑比它更重。Kun 的背面有一个金属支架。有了扩展坞或相应的加密狗，这款功能强大的设备就可以成为桌面的中心。
作为一款游戏设备，Kun 还提供多个 RGB 灯。这些灯光分布在两个拇指杆和 Ayaneo 按钮上。
开箱即用的 Kun 是一款有趣的设备。其包装由木材和丙烯酸玻璃等材料制成。这使得它既优雅又高品质。通过我们在 YouTube 上的开箱演示，您可以了解到这一点：
连接、网络摄像头和无线局域网
除了两个配备齐全的 USB-C 端口外，Kun 还提供一个 Type-A 端口。microSD 读卡器被保护在内置支架下。如果你愿意，还可以为这款大型手持设备添加 LTE 调制解调器。主板上有一个相应的接口，SIM 卡插槽也在支架下方。microSD 读卡器和 WLAN 的速度也不错。只有内置网络摄像头的图像质量不佳。不过，这实际上只是用于通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别，而不是用于视频通话。因此，摄像头没有红外滤光片。从下面测试图片中的高色彩偏差就可以看出这一点。电源按钮上的指纹扫描仪也可用于登录 Windows。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class UMPC (42 - 184, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (84.6 - 251, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
维护
拆卸 Ayaneo Kun 并不容易。首先，您必须取下背面的两个手柄盖。此外，还需要取下肩部按键之间的条带--这就露出了需要卸下的螺丝。要访问内部的所有连接，需要卸下更多螺丝并拔掉一些带状电缆。应特别注意指纹传感器的带状电缆。虽然它的长度足以安全地卸下底壳，但很容易因弯曲而损坏。要访问 M.2-2280 NVMe 固态硬盘，必须先卸下 microSD 读卡器和 SIM 卡的连接板。与 Air 1S一样，其中一个螺丝上有保修贴纸，但可以很容易地完全取下。WLAN 模块也可以更换，但安装得更深。风扇和塑料边框也必须取下才能接触到插卡。LTE 调制解调器的连接在我们的案例中没有使用，但可以加装。不过，我们在测试设备中没有看到预装的相应天线。对于较旧的手持设备，Ayaneo 在自己的商店中提供了许多备件。.Ayaneo Kun 的配件也将很快推出。
输入设备
虽然 Kun 是一款非常大的手持设备，但所有按钮、拇指杆和触发器都很容易触及。要在不改变握持方式的情况下操作双圆触摸板则稍显困难。除了 Xbox 手柄上的标准按键外，Kun 还提供了几个可通过 Ayaspace 使用的按键，我们曾在 Ayaneo Air 1S的评测中测试过。手持设备背面有四个额外的按钮，肩部触发器之间有两个按钮。正面还有功能按钮，其中一些可以配置。
与 Steam Deck 类似，Ayaneo Kun 也有两个触摸板，便于在桌面上进行导航，也可在游戏中设置宏和功能。与典型的 Ayaneo 风格一样，制造商在触发器和拇指杆上使用了霍尔效应传感器。这些传感器被认为是无磨损的，因此绝不会出现摇杆漂移。不过，在我们的测试中，两根橡胶铝质拇指杆不仅在外观上给人留下了深刻印象。毫无疑问，它们非常直接，可提供精确的输入，零位附近的死区很小。
手持设备有时会出现的另一个问题是振动和触觉马达提供的触觉反馈质量。Kun 提供了一种名为 Ayaneo HD 线性电机的技术。这些电机在手持设备中移动的质量相当大，可以产生强烈和明显定向的隆隆声。两个线性电机位于设备外侧，可以直接施力。这意味着，Kun 提供的反馈比 Ayaneo Air 1S或 联想Legion Go.
显示屏
Ayaneo 宣称，Kun 的屏幕亮度高达 500 cd/m²，100% 的 sRGB 和 90% 的 DisplayP3 色域。Kun 的屏幕显然超过了这一标准。我们测得的亮度高达 700 cd/m²，照度为 91%，并不完美。IPS 面板分辨率为 2,560 × 1,600 像素，非常清晰，响应时间也不错。不过，60 Hz 的刷新率明显低于Legion Go。这意味着在游戏时，这款立式平板显示屏通常必须使用 V-Sync。否则，许多游戏都会出现撕裂现象。在实际使用中，光照不均匀的问题并不明显，但显示屏良好的色彩还原和高对比度却很明显。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 684 cd/m²
Contrast: 1360:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
91.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.52% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2
| Ayaneo Kun Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.40 | Lenovo Legion Go Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.80 | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Ayaneo-OLED, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7.00 | GPD Win 4 G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00 | One Netbook XPlayer 2 FLQ8423, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.40 | Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD 1280x800, 7.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 6% | -21% | -23% | -14% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 93.52 | 92.1 -2% | 99.85 7% | 65.6 -30% | 63.1 -33% | 75.4 -19% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.56 0% | 100 1% | 92.1 -7% | 92 -7% | 97 -2% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 91.2 | 90.09 -1% | 99.71 9% | 67.9 -26% | 64.6 -29% | 71.1 -22% | |
| Response Times | -24% | 17% | 60% | -20% | -47% | -36% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 24.2 ? | 20.8 ? 14% | 4.4 ? 82% | 10.5 ? 57% | 26.8 ? -11% | 36.8 ? -52% | 30.1 ? -24% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 16.2 ? | 14.4 ? 11% | 5 ? 69% | 6 ? 63% | 20.9 ? -29% | 22.8 ? -41% | 14.5 ? 10% |
| PWM Frequency | 20000 | 700 -96% | 240 ? -99% | 1080 ? -95% | |||
| Screen | -30% | -21% | 2% | -28% | -34% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 680 | 411 -40% | 331 -51% | 513 -25% | 413.1 -39% | 369 -46% | 517 -24% |
| Brightness | 678 | 413 -39% | 339 -50% | 474 -30% | 407 -40% | 363 -46% | 524 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 80 -12% | 90 -1% | 84 -8% | 81 -11% | 89 -2% | 97 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.42 16% | 0.07 86% | 0.38 24% | 0.39 22% | 0.28 44% | 0.47 6% |
| Contrast | 1360 | 979 -28% | 4729 248% | 1350 -1% | 1059 -22% | 1318 -3% | 1100 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 5.94 -49% | 4.76 -19% | 3.7 7% | 6.97 -74% | 7.1 -78% | 5.7 -43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9 | 10.56 -17% | 9.2 -2% | 8.3 8% | 14.11 -57% | 10.9 -21% | 10.5 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 2.95 -195% | 5.04 -404% | 1.24 -24% | 2.6 -160% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9 | 0.92 90% | 8.79 2% | 5.1 43% | 9.9 -10% | 8.3 8% | 5.7 37% |
| Gamma | 2 110% | 1.93 114% | 2.155 102% | 2.14 103% | 2.04 108% | 2.01 109% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 7188 90% | 8064 81% | 7571 86% | 7732 84% | 9571 68% | 8838 74% | 7733 84% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-23% | 1% /
-8% | 14% /
6% | -24% /
-26% | -32% /
-31% | -23% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
我们无法确定游戏设备是否真的需要精确的色彩还原。不过，我们的测量结果表明，使用我们的 ICC 文件（在信息框中）可以将 Ayaneo Kun 值提高到很好的水平，这也适合专业平面设计师使用。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 24.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 20000 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 20000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 20000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
鲲的背光通过直流调光来调节，但所需电容器的容量似乎不太合适。在 80 % 和 30 % 之间的某些亮度设置下，我们会看到频率约为 20 kHz 的高频闪烁。不过，即使对敏感的人来说，这也不会造成问题。
尽管 Ayaneo Kun 的显示屏非常明亮，但在户外和强光源下，游戏手持设备屏幕的可读性会受到明显影响。在这种情况下，您往往需要利用良好的可视角度来避免反光。
性能
Ayaneo Kun 可配置 16、32 或 64 GB 内存，以及 512 GB 至 4 TB 的大容量存储空间。根据所选配置的不同，并非所有颜色都能提供。配置 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U用于所有配置机型。除了技术上非常相似的 AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme之外，目前几乎所有的游戏手持设备都采用了这种 APU。
测试条件
Ayaneo KUN 处理器的 TDP 可设置为 5 至 54 瓦。这将 PL2 提升到一个相对较高的值。如果同时禁用 Ayaspace 中的处理器升压功能，Ryzen 7 7840U 中 CPU 内核的性能仍将限制在 28 瓦。此时，只有 RX 780M 可以发挥最大性能。散热模式也有多种设置，这些设置对系统性能和噪音水平都有很大影响。
在测试中，我们使用 54 瓦的 TDP 和最大冷却模式进行所有基准测试。提高 Ayaneo Kun 性能的一个方法是将风扇开到 100%。否则，在测试中将无法达到风扇的最大转速。
处理器
最近，我们有几款笔记本电脑配备了 AMD 强大的 Ryzen 7 7840U的笔记本电脑进行了测试。实际上，这款处理器的设计功耗为 28 瓦，没有任何其他设备能像测试设备一样提供如此多的能量。这使得 Ayaneo Kun 在多核性能方面处于比较领域的顶端。相比之下，我们的测试设备在单核基准测试中表现平平。不过，在玩游戏时应使用 CPU 的全部 8 个核心和 16 个线程。
ROG ROG Ally Z1 Extreme和 联想Legion Go配备了 AMD Z1 Extreme.这款处理器在技术上与鲲中的 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 非常相似，但没有 Ryzen AI。如果比较两款芯片不同性能级别的 CB-R23 多核结果，就会发现 Z1 Extreme 可能更节能一些。我们将在 "游戏 "部分探讨这对游戏掌上电脑主要任务的影响程度。
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go -2! | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class UMPC | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (11739 - 15074, n=10) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class UMPC (3984 - 15074, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class UMPC (1597 - 1733, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1373 - 1742, n=10) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (4469 - 5917, n=10) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class UMPC (1521 - 5917, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (533 - 678, n=10) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average of class UMPC (357 - 676, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1025 - 2439, n=12) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class UMPC (689 - 2439, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class UMPC (246 - 268, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (217 - 272, n=10) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (208 - 270, n=10) | |
| Average of class UMPC (208 - 262, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (50087 - 62156, n=10) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average of class UMPC (19684 - 62156, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (4657 - 6408, n=10) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average of class UMPC (3653 - 5782, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (7399 - 10558, n=10) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (4457 - 9803, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1355 - 1933, n=10) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class UMPC (1355 - 1898, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class UMPC (14.6 - 18.6, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (14.4 - 18.6, n=10) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (48.1 - 57.8, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (43.4 - 67.1, n=10) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (0.4559 - 0.581, n=10) | |
| Average of class UMPC (0.4651 - 0.4945, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class UMPC | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class UMPC (18736 - 25901, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (17924 - 25901, n=9) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class UMPC (78607 - 109745, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (78360 - 109745, n=9) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class UMPC (3691 - 4847, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (3519 - 4847, n=9) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class UMPC (91289 - 113343, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (83206 - 113343, n=9) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class UMPC (12286 - 14822, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (11969 - 14822, n=9) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class UMPC (41726 - 58482, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (40720 - 58482, n=9) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (57678 - 166333, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (53018 - 166333, n=9) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (801 - 1047, n=9) | |
| Average of class UMPC (687 - 1047, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class UMPC (9738 - 13846, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (9347 - 13846, n=9) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (26622 - 38173, n=9) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (26622 - 34764, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
系统性能
尽管处理器性能很高，但在 PCMark 10 基准测试中，Ayaneo Kun 的表现却不尽如人意。这可能是由于内存和 NVMe 固态硬盘的速度有点慢，节流很快。最终，Ayaneo Kun 只能在数字内容创建部分充分展示其性能，因为 CPU 和 GPU 性能在该部分更为重要。
这款游戏掌上电脑可以轻松应对日常任务。即使在玩游戏时，你也不会注意到固态硬盘有时会变慢。只有在复制较大文件时，问题才会很快显现出来。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (5866 - 7157, n=9) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (5866 - 6439, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (9068 - 11081, n=9) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (9068 - 10081, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7323 - 10099, n=9) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class UMPC (7323 - 8996, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7204 - 8987, n=9) | |
| Average of class UMPC (7204 - 8975, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6330 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (43255 - 70532, n=10) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average of class UMPC (32617 - 76512, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (37399 - 61602, n=9) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average of class UMPC (25380 - 55710, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (49426 - 92289, n=11) | |
| Average of class UMPC (25596 - 108872, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (112.6 - 132.7, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (90 - 137.2, n=10) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
我们的 DPC 延迟测试包括冲浪、流媒体和使用所有处理器内核的 Prime95 短时间负载。只有在最后一步，Ayaneo Kun 测试中测得的延迟才会增加，以至于 LatencyMon 能识别出潜在的问题。大型手持设备通常不会出现延迟过长的问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB NVMe 固态硬盘实际上是一款速度非常快的大容量存储设备，但如果冷却不当，也容易迅速过热。我们在 DiskSPD 循环中也看到了这个问题。仅运行三次后，固态硬盘就会开始节流。因此，读取速度大幅下降--从大约6900 MB/s下降到大约620 MB/s。我们感到惊讶的是，Ayaneo竟然没有使用散热垫来通过金属支架散去固态硬盘的部分废热。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB | |
| Average of class UMPC | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在 Ayaneo Kun 中，RX 780M 的功耗是所有对比设备中最高的。但实际上，Ayaneo Kun 的领先优势非常小。我们可以再次看到，Ayaneo Kun 的性能略高于 ROG Ally 或Legion Go，但这一优势与处理器更高的功耗并不相符。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M | |
| Average of class UMPC | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme -1! | |
| GPD Win 4 -1! | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1! | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 172658 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35532 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7766 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3232 points | |
Help | ||
游戏
如果你想利用 Ayaneo Kun 显示屏的全 QHD+ 分辨率玩游戏，你可能不得不忍受低帧率或低画质水平。与 联想Legion Go一样，我们也发现 FullHD 更符合硬件的性能。不过，这个分辨率在 8.4 英寸的小屏幕上完全够用。另外，目前许多游戏都采用了升频技术，这对帧速率有很大的积极影响。
在我们的 Steam 游戏库中，没有一款游戏在掌机上无法运行。大多数游戏甚至在高画质或最高画质设置下都运行得非常流畅。只有《霍格沃茨传奇》和《赛博朋克 2077》例外。不过，这两款游戏都提供了 AMD FSR，可确保在 QHD+ 和高画质设置下实现高达 45 帧的良好帧率。
在某些情况下，AMD Ryzen 7 及其 iGPU 在《鲲》中的高性能表现在测试结果中显而易见。但是，必须明确指出的是，华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 和 AMD Ryzen 7 之间的差异并不明显。 华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 和联想Legion Go 之间的差异并没有大到让人期待 Kun 能带来明显优势的地步。30 瓦的 TDP 设置也完全足以流畅运行所有测试游戏。这降低了功耗，大大提高了电池续航时间。
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (26.3 - 33.9, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class UMPC (19.5 - 26.7, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class UMPC (18.4 - 28.6, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class UMPC (30 - 49.1, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average of class UMPC (57 - 78.7, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class UMPC (24.5 - 33.8, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (53.9 - 77.4, n=7) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (40.1 - 53.9, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (22.1 - 29, n=11) | |
| Average of class UMPC (21.1 - 29, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (88 - 109.2, n=8) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD | |
| Average of class UMPC (41 - 54, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (32 - 42, n=11) | |
| Average of class UMPC (28 - 42, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:High T | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (26.2 - 37.6, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (21.9 - 37.6, n=5) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (19.4 - 28, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (17.7 - 28, n=5) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (14.9 - 22.4, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.7 - 22.4, n=5) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | |
| 1920x1080 Favor Quality | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (36 - 44, n=3) | |
| Average of class UMPC (33 - 44, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (31 - 38, n=3) | |
| Average of class UMPC (31 - 38, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| 2560x1440 Ultimate Quality | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (22 - 24, n=3) | |
| Average of class UMPC (22 - 24, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | |
| 1920x1080 High Settings | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (38.2 - 45.5, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (31.3 - 45.5, n=3) | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Settings | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (41.2 - 45, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (30.4 - 45, n=3) | |
| 2560x1440 Highest Settings | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (22.2 - 26.3, n=2) | |
| Average of class UMPC (22.2 - 26.3, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| F1 23 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class UMPC (43.7 - 61.1, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (28.4 - 61.1, n=23) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class UMPC (8.87 - 14.6, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (7.63 - 14.7, n=16) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 116.5 | 132.9 | 68.4 | 26.7 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 43.3 | 33.9 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 108.7 | 90.2 | 63.8 | 59.7 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 79.1 | 38.5 | 28.6 | 21 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 45.7 | 26.2 | 24.5 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 47 | 45 | 43 | 27 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 158.3 | 65.6 | 56.6 | 49.1 | 30.9 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 43 | 42 | 36 | ||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 51 | 44 | 38 | 24 | |
| Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 43.7 | 45.5 | 45 | 26.3 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 37.6 | 28 | 22.4 | 16 | |
| F1 23 (2023) | 95.4 | 84.4 | 61.1 | 14.6 | 8.22 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 43.4 | 33.9 | 27.3 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
Ayaneo Kun 的不同冷却模式也确保了不同的背景噪音水平。在静音冷却模式下，风扇会稍微转动一下，但我们的测量麦克风几乎检测不到 25 dB（A）的环境音量变化，即使在 15 厘米的距离上也是如此。平衡模式的最大音量为 35 dB(A)，而最大冷却模式的音量也只有 44 dB(A)。如果你想让风扇以 100% 的速度持续运转，则必须忍受约 51 dB(A)的噪音。这相当于最大冷却模式下可感知音量的两倍。
Ayaneo Kun 处理器的性能可以自由调节。这也会增加或减少废热，并最终增加或减少所需的风扇转速。30 瓦的 TDP 值足以满足大多数游戏掌机的需求。因此，其 35 dB(A) 的噪音水平略低于Legion Go。如果您想使用该设备的全部功率，就必须忍受高音量。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.31 / 25.31 / 34.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 34.9 / 50.78 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) | ||
| Ayaneo Kun Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB | Lenovo Legion Go Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM | GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB | One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 13% | 9% | 10% | -14% | -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.31 | 23 9% | 24.7 2% | 23.3 8% | 31.2 -23% | 26.1 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 25.31 | 23 9% | 25.2 -0% | 23.3 8% | 31.2 -23% | 31.6 -25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34.5 | 25 28% | 25.2 27% | 27.3 21% | 33.5 3% | 31.6 8% |
| Load Average * | 34.9 | 37 -6% | 32.1 8% | 39.2 -12% | 45.5 -30% | 35.7 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 50.78 | 37 27% | 47.1 7% | 39.2 23% | 49 4% | 43.3 15% |
| off / environment * | 23 | 23 | 23.3 | 24 | 26.1 | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 | 39.2 | 48.6 | 43.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
对于游戏手持设备而言，设备的长距离温度是决定设备是否适合游戏的决定性因素。我们的热图像和实际体验表明，至少在关键部位，Kun 仍然保持着令人愉悦的低温。两个控制器和所有按键的温度仅略高于室温。屏幕和主板上方的背面温度明显较高。我们的热像仪显示背面温度为 90 °C，但不得不说，塑料外壳和屏幕的直接表面测量值接近 60 °C。我们怀疑是金属漆刺激了热像仪。K 型热电偶和 Fluke t3000 显示的数值可能更合理。这也证实了主观温度感觉。
发言人
测试设备中的两个扬声器提供了不错的音效，甚至可以与较大的笔记本电脑媲美。由于 Kun 的扬声器朝下，因此通常会指向用户。不过，我们的测试设置并不能完全反映手持设备的声音，因为如果需要，Kun 还可以通过振动电机重现低音。这就确保了低音明显更容易被感知。从主观感受上来说，声音要强劲得多。
Ayaneo Kun audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 22% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 19%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Go audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 19%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Ayaneo Kun 随附了一个 100 瓦的 USB-C 电源装置。这也是迫切需要的，因为与明亮的屏幕和强大的处理器一起，这款游戏掌机也有相应的功耗。游戏时最高可达到 90 瓦。如果将 Kun 的 TDP 设置得相应高，那么它的功耗将远高于Legion Go。不过，其他能耗测量结果也表明，Kun 比联想的直接竞争对手更节能，尤其是在中低负载时。
正如在体积和性能基准测试中所指出的，Ayaneo Kun 在配置方面为用户提供了很大的自由度。制造商让用户自己决定何时需要什么样的性能。这同样适用于功耗、表面温度和风扇容量。
| Off / Standby | 0.07 / 4 Watt |
| Idle | 14 / 17.56 / 27 Watt |
| Load |
38.1 / 101 Watt |
   
| |
Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
Ayaneo Kun 的电池容量为 75 Wh，是同类产品中最大的。如果有人认为这也意味着最长的电池续航时间，那么很遗憾他将会失望。再说一遍，这完全取决于您如何使用这款游戏掌上电脑。如果限制帧数和 TDP，并将屏幕亮度设为较低值，那么在 30 帧的全高清超画质预设下，您可以在一次充电的情况下玩大约 1:41 小时的《Witcher 3 》。在 FSR 和帧率受限的情况下，我们可以玩约两个小时的《霍格沃茨传奇》。在旧版游戏中，有时处理器性能会受到很大限制，TDP 为 9 瓦就足够了。这样也可以玩上四五个小时。不过，如果把所有设置都调到最高，很快就会发现 Ayaneo Kun 电池的电量会在 50 分钟内耗尽。
不过，对于办公应用、网上冲浪和轻度浏览器游戏，电池的续航时间应该会很长。在我们的实际 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中，Ayaneo Kun 在 PC Office 性能计划中取得了超过 10 小时的优异成绩。
| Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 37.5 Wh | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65.5 Wh | Average of class UMPC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -31% | -18% | -34% | 15% | -1% | -1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 602 | 358 -41% | 355 -41% | 465 -23% | 450 -25% | 628 4% | 504 ? -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 101 | 57 -44% | 96 -5% | 86.5 ? -14% | |||
| Gaming | 122 | 97 -20% | 74 -39% | 136.3 ? 12% | |||
| Load | 50 | 63 26% | 77 54% | 56.5 ? 13% | |||
| H.264 | 185 | 568 | 185 ? | ||||
| Reader / Idle | 581 |
Pros
Cons
判决
根据我们的测试经验，可以很容易地说，与联想Legion Go 相比，Ayaneo Kun 几乎在所有方面都更胜一筹。但遗憾的是，事情并没有那么简单，因为Legion Go 在欧洲的售价为 800 欧元起，而 Ayaneo Kun 至少需要进口 1000 欧元。这意味着还需要支付进口销售税（约 200 欧元）。这就提出了一个问题：400 欧元的附加费在多大程度上是合理的。从好的方面看，Kun 性能极佳，可自由配置，屏幕明亮，控制器出色，电池持久耐用，音质良好。在这些方面，Kun 明显优于Legion Go。此外，鲲的外壳质量高、模块化设计（WLAN 模块、2280 M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘和可能的 LTE 调制解调器）以及更舒适的手感也为其加分不少。不过，联想Legion Go 也有自己的优势，我们将在相应的评测中重点介绍 在相应的评论中.
不过，在纯游戏方面，两款设备的主观差异极小。得益于 144 Hz 显示屏，Legion Go 在这方面的表现甚至可能略胜一筹。客观地说，根据基准测试结果，两款设备的性能也大致相当。如果您购买掌上电脑是为了通过外接显示器上的扩展坞将其用作台式机的替代品，那么 Ayaneo Kun 可能会略胜一筹。除了 I/O 端口略胜一筹外，它在某些应用中的计算能力也更强。
Ayaneo Kun 是一款功能强大、体积庞大、外观漂亮的游戏掌上电脑。但竞争对手的各种设备也很强大。
最后，Ayaneo Kun 推荐给那些喜欢调整硬件而不仅仅是切换性能方案的用户。如果你能掌握绫致空间的各种可能性，就能获得令人难以置信的性能。当然，你也可以调整大型游戏掌上电脑的硬件。与大多数其他掌机相比，业余爱好者应该会更喜欢绫宇坤。我们在 Ayaneo Air 1S.另一方面，如果你想要的只是一款可以玩游戏的设备，那么你可能应该选择 联想Legion Go或 华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme.虽然这两款设备在维护方面要逊色得多，但它们在性能方面也更容易调整。
价格和供应情况
我们的测试设备配备 64 GB 内存和 4 TB NVMe SSD，从制造商处购买的价格约为 1,700 欧元。可能需要加收进口关税和进口销售税。最便宜的 Kun 配置可在的 Ayaneo 商店购买，价格约为 1,000 欧元。.目前还可以在Indiegogo 上预订，价格约为 900 欧元。.
Ayaneo Kun
-
01/22/2024 v7
Marc Herter
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
