Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G8 笔记本电脑评测--AMD Zen4 并非自动更好
我们已经测试过目前的第八代 Yoga Pro 7 14（在不少市场上也被称为 Yoga Slim Pro 7）的几种不同配置--从配备 iGPU 和 2.5K 显示屏的 AMD 处理器（Zen3+），到配备英特尔 CPU、GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑和可选 3K 面板的顶级型号。所有版本的子笔记本电脑或多媒体笔记本电脑都取得了不错的成绩，联想现在还提供配备 AMD 最新 Zen4 CPU 的版本。
我们的测试设备是 Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8（82Y80020GE），配备 Ryzen 7 7840HS，包括 Radeon 780M iGPU、32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 2.5K 雾面面板。该配置的价格约为 1300 美元，校园机型则为 1200 美元。您还可以选择购买新的 Zen4 芯片、GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 和 3K 面板，价格约为 1,650 美元（校园机型：1,500 美元），但只能配备 16 GB 内存。
在本次评测中，我们将主要关注新处理器的性能，以及笔记本电脑的排放和运行时间。有关其外壳、连接性、输入设备和扬声器的更多信息，请查看我们之前的评测：
- 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G8(AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS、Radeon 680M、2.5K IPS 显示屏）
- 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G8(英特尔酷睿 i7-13700H、GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑、3K IPS 显示屏)
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.6 % | 01/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89 % | 04/2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
12/2023 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | ||
| 88.9 % | 10/2023 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.2 % | 10/2023 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 R7 7840S, Radeon 780M | 1.3 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.50" | 2944x1840 | |
| 87.8 % | 11/2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
| Networking | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
显示屏 - 雾面 90-Hz IPS 面板
这款笔记本电脑的哑光 IPS 显示屏宽高比为 16:10，分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素。主观而言，这块 90-Hz 面板的画质依然非常出色，内容显示清晰，即使是浅色区域也不会出现颗粒感。此外，它的反应速度也不错，而且没有使用 PWM。
在亮度方面，本测试设备的表现稍差，平均亮度为 348 cd/m²。反过来，其 0.22 的黑色值稍好一些，从而获得了更好的最大对比度。但原则上，这些微小的偏差都属于批量生产的正常范围。
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro2）对面板进行了测量，显示屏在出厂状态下就已经很不错了。虽然我们注意到蓝色色调极少，色温也略微偏冷，但这只能用肉眼直接与校准过的显示器进行比较才能看出。不过，与 sRGB 参考值相比，它的色彩偏差已经非常小了，只有 100 % 红色超过了 3 的重要偏差。
通过我们自己的校准（可在下面的显示框中免费下载配置文件），我们能够从整体上改善这些值，并纠正其轻微的色调，但红色偏差仍然存在。得益于其完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围，该面板仍然适用于编辑图像/视频。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 357 cd/m²
Contrast: 1623:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
73.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.50 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 CSOT T3 MNE007ZA1-3, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.50 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 24% | 2% | 17% | 23% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 72.3 | 71.8 -1% | 99.75 38% | 74.7 3% | 97.1 34% | 99.8 38% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 99.2 -1% | 99.99 0% | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.4 | 73.1 0% | 98.56 34% | 75.8 3% | 86.5 18% | 95.8 31% |
| Response Times | 5% | 75% | 36% | 98% | 98% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.6 ? | 43.2 ? 1% | 2.2 ? 95% | 32.2 ? 26% | 0.77 ? 98% | 0.82 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.2 ? | 25.9 ? 8% | 12.8 ? 55% | 15.4 ? 45% | 0.83 ? 97% | 0.95 ? 97% |
| PWM Frequency | 300 | 360 ? | 504.7 ? | |||
| Screen | -41% | -5% | 1% | 25% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 357 | 386 8% | 388 9% | 402 13% | 387 8% | 384 8% |
| Brightness | 348 | 366 5% | 391 12% | 371 7% | 388 11% | 386 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 91 3% | 98 11% | 86 -2% | 98 11% | 98 11% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.26 -18% | 0.0411 81% | 0.27 -23% | ||
| Contrast | 1623 | 1485 -9% | 9440 482% | 1489 -8% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2 | 3.8 -90% | 6.32 -216% | 1.8 10% | 1.3 35% | 4.06 -103% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.8 | 9.1 -139% | 8.82 -132% | 3.6 5% | 2.6 32% | 6.73 -77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 1.2 -0% | 4.79 -299% | 1.5 -25% | 0.49 59% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 6.2 -130% | 2.61 3% | 1.8 33% | 1.3 52% | 1.1 59% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.09 105% | 1.772 124% | 2.27 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6929 94% | 6618 98% | 6202 105% | 6695 97% | 6360 102% | 6331 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-26% | 31% /
12% | 13% /
6% | 47% /
36% | 39% /
19% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
在室外，磨砂显示屏给人留下了不错的印象--只有阳光直射时，笔记本电脑的最大亮度无法达到，屏幕无法保持清晰。IPS 面板的视角稳定性不错。
性能 - AMD Zen 4 和 32 GB 内存
联想为其 Yoga Pro 7 14 G8 配备了英特尔最新的 Zen4 CPU，与旧型号相比，其 Ryzen 7 7840HS现在已与专用的 GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑- 而在过去，这只是英特尔版本的专利。在内存方面，这款机型继续受到不必要的限制：我们的 iGPU 测试设备配备了 32 GB 内存，而配备GeForce GPU 的机型仍然只有 16 GB。
测试条件
在预装的 Vantage 应用程序中，联想提供了不同的性能模式，可通过组合键 "Fn+Q "轻松选择。正如在前代机型上已经看到的，在配备 iGPU 的机型上使用 "最高性能"（64/60 瓦）模式意义不大，因为由此带来的性能提升非常低，而风扇只会转得更响。在执行简单任务时，可以放心使用省电模式（28/25 瓦）。我们使用 "智能冷却 "模式（28/25 瓦）进行了以下基准测试和测量。总的来说，我们注意到功率限制比其 前代与 Ryzen 7 7735HS.
处理器 - Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS配备 8 个现代 Zen4 内核，可同时处理 16 个线程，最高主频可达 5.1 GHz。与 Ryzen 7735HS 相比，它的总体性能非常出色（这也要归功于其更高的功耗限制），在多核测试中速度提高了 20%，在单核测试中速度提高了 12%。 Ryzen 7 7735HS相比，它在多核测试中的速度提高了 20%，在单核测试中的速度提高了 12%。它的多核性能也超越了采用英特尔 CPU 的竞争对手（即使是新的 Meteor Lake 酷睿至尊 7 155H)，而在单核测试中，英特尔芯片的速度稍快。
它的 CPU 性能在长期负载和电池使用情况下保持完全稳定。更多 CPU 基准测试结果，请访问技术版块。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (15515 - 17214, n=15) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1737 - 1812, n=15) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6061 - 6744, n=16) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (661 - 705, n=16) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2473 - 2729, n=15) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (270 - 286, n=15) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (185 - 229, n=17) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (59538 - 73035, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6049 - 6754, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8446 - 12339, n=19) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1837 - 2017, n=19) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (11.7 - 21.8, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (38.3 - 68.3, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (0.4184 - 0.4739, n=17) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (24712 - 28921, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (103755 - 123167, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (4293 - 5096, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (105028 - 122681, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (14385 - 15525, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (55540 - 65812, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (67389 - 177158, n=17) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (949 - 1123, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13100 - 15599, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17615 - 41157, n=17) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
系统性能
在日常使用中，配备 Zen4 处理器的 Yoga Pro 7 14 反应迅速，其合成基准测试结果令人印象深刻。在测试过程中，我们没有发现该设备存在任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7039 - 7651, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10519 - 11214, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9717 - 10970, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9052 - 9987, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1566 - 1873, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1535 - 1816, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1556 - 2040, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1293 - 1706, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7039 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30937 - 72158, n=17) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30497 - 61911, n=17) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (34590 - 93323, n=17) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (85.1 - 112, n=17) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载），测试设备在重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值方面没有出现任何问题，只有一个驱动程序出现了一些问题。因此，该设备非常适合实时音频用途。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
1 TB 版本的三星 PM9A1 安装在我们的测试设备中，首次启动设备后，用户有 892 GB 的可用空间。PCIe-4.0 硬盘的速度非常快，最大传输速率超过 7 GB/s，但在长期负载的情况下，其性能并不稳定，会导致 50% 的损耗。3 GB/秒以上的性能仍然足以满足日常使用，没有任何限制。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Yoga Pro 的显卡是 Radeon 780M在这种情况下，它得益于双通道配置的快速 LPDDR5x-6400 内存，是我们迄今测试过的速度最快的 Radeon 780M 之一。iGPU 的速度比 Radeon 680M快约 11%，但在合成测试中被新的 英特尔弧 GPU(8核）击败。不过，两者之间 6% 的差距并不算太大。
iGPU 适合日常使用，包括播放高分辨率视频，其性能甚至足以应付一两款零星的游戏--不过，你通常不得不放弃玩最新的游戏。不过，在要求不高的游戏中，你通常可以使用中高分辨率进行游戏。在实际游戏测试中，Radeon 780M 也领先于新的英特尔 Arc GPU，尽管我们还没有该机型的基准测试结果。如果你有更大的游戏野心，你应该选择配备了 GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑不过，您将不得不放弃 32 GB 内存。
在持续负载下，笔记本电脑的图形性能完全稳定，在电池模式下也是如此。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13131 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7385 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3146 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (302 - 548, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (336 - 1548, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (305 - 503, n=33) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
* ... smaller is better
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.01 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.24 - 50.1, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 145.3 | 133.2 | 66.1 | 26.5 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 157 | 48 | 30 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 131 | 108.1 | 75 | 70.1 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78.3 | 37.6 | 28.3 | 20.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.9 | 35.8 | 29 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 77 | 48 | 44 | 41 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 166.4 | 64.4 | 55.7 | 47.7 | |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 204 | 104.9 | 80.9 | 34.4 | |
| F1 22 (2022) | 92.5 | 80.7 | 62.3 | 16.9 | |
| F1 23 (2023) | 90.3 | 80.3 | 57.6 | 13.6 |
排放与动力
噪音排放
总的来说，使用 Zen4 处理器后，Yoga 的声音变得有点大，这也是由于其功率限制提高了。在日常使用中，风扇的启动速度也比前一代机型更快一些。如果你不需要 CPU 的全部性能，我们建议你在日常使用中使用省电模式。在低负载情况下，Zen4 和 Zen4 的噪音值仍不相上下，但在游戏和压力测试中，Zen4 的噪音略大于 Zen4。在最高性能模式下，我们测得的最大噪音为 47.7 分贝（A）。测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 27.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36.7 / 44.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840S, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -1% | -2% | -5% | 7% | |
| off / environment * | 24.3 | 24.2 -0% | 25 -3% | 24.5 -1% | 24.5 -1% | 23.4 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 24.2 -0% | 25 -3% | 24.5 -1% | 24.5 -1% | 24.1 1% |
| Idle Average * | 24.3 | 24.2 -0% | 25 -3% | 24.5 -1% | 24.5 -1% | 24.1 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.9 | 24.2 13% | 26.2 6% | 30.4 -9% | 27.7 1% | 25.3 9% |
| Load Average * | 36.7 | 36.2 1% | 35.7 3% | 39.5 -8% | 45.5 -24% | 33.4 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.2 | 42.7 3% | 41.7 6% | 45.5 -3% | 39.4 11% | |
| Load Maximum * | 44.2 | 36.2 18% | 45.5 -3% | 44.9 -2% | 45.5 -3% | 39.4 11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲模式和低负载情况下，笔记本电脑的表面温度完全没有问题。不过，在负载情况下，底座底部会明显发热，我们在后部中央区域测得的最高温度略低于 50 °C。因此，应避免皮肤接触该区域。底座顶部的温度明显较低，最高温度为 42 °C，但在这里打字时手指也会变热。在压力测试中，Ryzen 处理器的功耗稳定在 50 瓦以下。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840S, AMD Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | -4% | 0% | -3% | 11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42.1 | 39.2 7% | 36.5 13% | 45.8 -9% | 43.8 -4% | 39 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49.7 | 49.8 -0% | 49.5 -0% | 42 15% | 56 -13% | 35.8 28% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.7 | 24.2 6% | 25.5 1% | 27.5 -7% | 25.3 2% | 25.2 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.3 | 25.1 8% | 35 -28% | 27.1 1% | 26.7 2% | 25.6 6% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Zen4 Yoga 在空闲模式和负载状态下的功耗都有所增加，导致其在短时间内达到了 100 瓦电源的极限。在压力测试中，它的耗电量又迅速下降了一些，但留给电池充电的空间并不大。
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840S, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | -1% | 23% | -12% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.6 | 4.1 27% | 5.5 2% | 4.2 25% | 8.7 -55% | 6 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 8.8 | 7.7 12% | 10.1 -15% | 7.4 16% | 11.3 -28% | 6.5 26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9 | 7.9 12% | 11.2 -24% | 8 11% | 12 -33% | 13.9 -54% |
| Load Average * | 58.5 | 66.2 -13% | 45.9 22% | 42.8 27% | 58.6 -0% | 41.9 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 71 | 61.5 13% | 60.9 14% | 47.9 33% | 61.6 13% | 43.9 38% |
| Load Maximum * | 100.6 | 84.3 16% | 104.1 -3% | 76 24% | 66.2 34% | 50.8 50% |
* ... smaller is better
| Off / Standby | 0.34 / 0.7 Watt |
| Idle | 5.6 / 8.8 / 9 Watt |
| Load |
58.5 / 100.6 Watt |
   
| |
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
该设备的 73 Wh 电池容量没有变化，但由于能耗要求较高，其运行时间比上一代 AMD Yoga 差。在亮度为 150 cd/m²、刷新率为 60 Hz 的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的运行时间为 10:18 小时（90 Hz 时为 09:25 小时），全亮度时为 07:56 小时（90 Hz 时为 07:39 小时）。在视频测试中，我们测得的时长为 12:17，总体上比配备 Zen3 处理器的 Yoga 短。 配备 Zen3+ 处理器的 Yoga.
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 73 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, 73 Wh | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 65 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 99 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 R7 7840S, Radeon 780M, 70 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 17% | -18% | 33% | -13% | 13% | 15% | |
| H.264 | 737 | 903 23% | 690 -6% | 794 ? 8% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 618 | 783 27% | 479 -22% | 823 33% | 571 -8% | 510 -17% | 629 ? 2% |
| Load | 86 | 86 0% | 74 -14% | 64 -26% | 122 42% | 115.4 ? 34% |
Pros
Cons
结论：Zen4 Yoga 性能更强，但电池续航时间较短
即使在换用 AMD Zen4 处理器之后，Yoga Pro 7 14 G8 依然是一款出色的多媒体笔记本电脑，在许多方面（机箱、连接、输入设备、显示屏）都没有任何改变。从 AMD Zen3+ 到 Zen4 处理器带来了更高的性能（CPU 和 iGPU），但代价是更高的功耗限制。
在日常使用中，这会导致更高的风扇活动，而这并不是完全必要的。在这里，联想本可以更清晰地划分其性能模式，因为使用智能冷却模式和最高性能模式时的性能值几乎完全相同。笔记本电脑的功耗也略高，这反过来又损害了它的运行时间。
AMD 的 Zen4 处理器可能会提供更高的性能，但其结果是，Yoga Pro 7 14 G8 的噪音变得更大，运行时间也没有那么好。
如果你不需要更高的性能，并且可以使用 16GB 内存，那么毫无疑问，你也可以选择 Ryzen 7 7735HS此外，你还能省下一笔钱。无论如何，Zen4 处理器现在还可以与专用的 GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑但遗憾的是，在这种情况下，联想将最大内存配置限制在 16 GB，这根本说不通。
价格和供应情况
Yoga Pro 7 14 G8 的售价约为 1,300 美元。虽然在亚马逊上找不到配备 AMD 处理器的版本，但配备英特尔处理器的版本售价为1,299 美元。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8
-
12/27/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
