Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

AMD Radeon R5(Stoney Ridge)是移动双核Stoney Ridge架构APU集成显卡中较弱的一款。在其推出时,它集成于AMD A9-9410中,采用3个激活的计算核心(384个着色器)。根据型号的不同,最高时钟频率为800MHz。根据热设计功率和内存配置的不同,它的性能会区别很大。相比于从Bristol Ridge系列的Radeon R5,它只有3个而不是6个GCN核心(且是Stoney Ridge芯片的完整配置)。

架构和特性

Radeon R5配备3个第三代GCN架构(通常称为GCN 1.2或2.0)的运算核心。这意味着它与Tonga桌面式芯片非常相似,支持DirectX 12(FL 12_0),但图形核心也可以通过Mantle,OpenGL和OpenCL访问。该显卡也支持HSA 1.0标准,因此可以高效地与处理器核心交换数据。它的技术规格和Carrizo前代型号相同。

视频单元包括UVD 6(统一视频解码器),支持硬件解码HEVC / H.265格式的4K视频。更多详情请见我们的Stoney Ridge架构处理器评测文章。

功耗

根据型号不同,和可定制热设计功率(CTDP),这块28纳米制程技术芯片功耗从10到25瓦不等。这意味着它可以也可以用于轻薄笔记本。

Radeon R (Stoney / Bristol Ridge) Series
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) 512 @ 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) 384 @ 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) 192 @ 0.8 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) 192 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) 128 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit
CodenameStoney Ridge
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 12_0), OpenGL 4.4
Power Consumption12-45 Watt
technology28 nm
FeaturesUVD 6, VCE
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.06.2016
CPU in Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD A9-94252 x 3100 MHz, 15 W? MHz900 MHz
AMD A9-9420e2 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
AMD A9-94202 x 3000 MHz, 10-25 W? MHz800 MHz
min. - max.? MHz720 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.6 pt (4%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -73%
...
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) -5%
AMD Radeon R5 M335 -3%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X -3%
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M 1%
AMD Radeon R5 M240 3%
AMD Radeon R5 M230 3%
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo) 4%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 274     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (1%)     max: 289 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 247     avg: 254.5     median: 254.5 (1%)     max: 262 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605 -56%
...
Intel UHD Graphics 600 -57%
Intel UHD Graphics 605 -56%
Intel UHD Graphics 610 -24%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) -19%
Intel HD Graphics 530 -8%
Intel UHD Graphics 615 -4%
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Intel HD Graphics 520 3%
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) 8%
Intel UHD Graphics 617 17%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M 29%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 46978     avg: 50907     median: 51382 (7%)     max: 54361 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 32172     avg: 33058     median: 33057.5 (5%)     max: 33943 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 2673     avg: 2893     median: 2995 (4%)     max: 3010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 3661     avg: 4439     median: 4755 (2%)     max: 4902 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 596     avg: 688     median: 712 (2%)     max: 757 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 642     avg: 765     median: 772 (1%)     max: 881 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 49964     avg: 51392     median: 51392 (7%)     max: 52820 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1103     avg: 1254     median: 1263 (3%)     max: 1387 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1096     avg: 1245     median: 1264 (2%)     max: 1356 Points
...
Intel UHD Graphics 615 -6%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G -5%
AMD Radeon R5 M230 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8570M -1%
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Intel HD Graphics 520 4%
...
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
3346 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5141     avg: 5174     median: 5174 (8%)     max: 5207 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
13.7 fps (5%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
10.5 fps (5%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2752     avg: 3847     median: 3773 (3%)     max: 5088 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 16.4     avg: 17.8     median: 16.6 (6%)     max: 20.39 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 19.66     avg: 22.3     median: 23 (6%)     max: 23.42 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
98 fps (3%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
67.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
32.6 fps (9%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
21.8 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
27.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
15.6 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
92 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
124 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 458     avg: 597     median: 597 (1%)     max: 736 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
30.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
39  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
7.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
32.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
41.4 47.8 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.9 25.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
21.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
19.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF TAA 1366x768
11.9
low 1280x720
28.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off FXAA 1366x768
17.1
low 1280x720
53.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.1  fps    + Compare