Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R5 M430

AMD Radeon R5 M430是一款适用于笔记本电脑的入门级显卡。在2016初,在联想Yoga 510 (14英寸机型)上发布。在技术水平上,他和先前的Radeon R5 M330 / M335或者R7 M340相似,不过,配备的是相对较慢的核心时钟频率--只有955 MHz (在IdeaPad 110中)。 它具有320个统一的着色单元和64位的DDR2内存,时钟频率为873 MHz。

其游戏性能与Radeon r5 M330相似,因此,属于入门水平。只有那些要求不算太高的游戏,例如《守望先锋》和《模拟农场2017》可以在低配设置下顺畅运行。请查阅下发,用来评测的游戏的名单。

Radeon R5 M430仍然是基于旧的GCN 1.0构架 (未经审核)且支持DirectX 12 (11_1基于GPU-Z).

Radeon R5 M400 Series

Radeon R5 M430 320 @ 0.96 GHz64 Bit @ 1746 MHz
Radeon R5 M420 320 @ 0.78 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
CodenameMars
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines320 - unified
Core Speed955 MHz
Memory Speed1746 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.3
technology28 nm
FeaturesOpenCL, DirectCompute 5.0
Date of Announcement01.05.2016
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.5 pt (1%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -86%
...
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
0.4148 -9%
AMD Radeon R5 M335
0.415 -9%
AMD Radeon R5 M330
0.42 -8%
0.4255 -7%
Intel HD Graphics 530
0.4259 -7%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
0.4323 -5%
0.4332 -5%
Intel HD Graphics 5600
0.4514 -1%
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
0.456 0%
AMD Radeon R5 M430
0.4574
0.4615 1%
0.4628 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
0.4656 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
0.4662 2%
0.4765 4%
0.4833 6%
AMD Radeon R7 M260
0.4861 6%
Intel HD Graphics 630
0.4861 6%
0.4922 8%
...
21.1 4513%
max:
33.3 7180%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4744 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 5249     avg: 5493     median: 5493 (1%)     max: 5737 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
899 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 989     avg: 1004     median: 1004 (1%)     max: 1019 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
42396 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1772     avg: 1822     median: 1821.5 (3%)     max: 1871 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1643     avg: 1689     median: 1689 (1%)     max: 1735 Points
171.8 -90%
...
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
1602 -5%
1621 -4%
1625 -4%
1628 -4%
AMD Radeon R5 M320
1652 -2%
1656 -2%
1671 -1%
1674 -1%
AMD Radeon R5 M330
1684 0%
AMD Radeon R5 M430
1689
Intel HD Graphics 630
1696 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
1703 1%
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
1708 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
1708 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
1711 1%
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
1711 1%
AMD FirePro M4100
1728 2%
1734 3%
1741 3%
...
59943 3449%
max:
106023 6177%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
4697 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3995 Points (2%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -98%
...
3752 -6%
3804 -5%
3858 -3%
3860 -3%
3866 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
3868 -3%
3881 -3%
3968 -1%
3969 -1%
AMD Radeon R5 M430
3995
4005 0%
AMD Radeon R5 M335
4032 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
4123 3%
4133 3%
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
4151 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
4169 4%
4212 5%
Intel HD Graphics 515
4218 6%
4229 6%
...
132443 3215%
max:
170928 4179%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
6246 Points (8%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
15.9 fps (3%)
0.6 -96%
...
15.23 -4%
15.3 -4%
AMD Radeon R5 M335
15.3 -4%
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
15.3 -4%
15.4 -3%
15.4 -3%
15.5 -3%
15.5 -3%
AMD FirePro M4100
15.6 -2%
AMD Radeon R5 M430
15.9
16.2 2%
16.4 3%
16.5 4%
16.5 4%
16.6 4%
16.6 4%
16.62 5%
Intel HD Graphics 515
16.85 6%
16.95 7%
...
532 3246%
0%
100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6225     avg: 7430     median: 7430 (5%)     max: 8635 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
25.8 fps (9%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 27.7     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (2%)     max: 32 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
21 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
23.5 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
77 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
340 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
699 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1219 points (1%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
15.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
20.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
38.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
66.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
23.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
low 1280x720
67.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
13.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
41.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x768
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
20.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
14.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
47  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
25.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
36.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
19.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
27.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
43.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
33.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
117.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
45.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
32.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
75  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
123.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
42.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
29.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
41.1 42.3 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24 26.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.8 22.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
43.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
54.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
66.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Watch Dogs 215.812.5
Dishonored 213.810.9
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare20.718.1
Titanfall 238.127.4
Farming Simulator 1766.14317.3
Battlefield 123.716.1
FIFA 1767.350.1
Deus Ex Mankind Divided13.5
Mirror's Edge Catalyst2716.3
Overwatch41.331.314.5
Ashes of the Singularity9.9
Need for Speed 201620.818.1
The Division
Far Cry Primal199
XCOM 214.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider18.811.5
Rainbow Six Siege4729.314.2
Just Cause 325.119.5
Star Wars Battlefront36.322.210.1
Fallout 419.412.8
Anno 220527.714.1
World of Warships43.631.1
Metal Gear Solid V33.522.8
Dota 2 Reborn7450.620.619.1
The Witcher 318
Dirt Rally117.332.515.9
GTA V3630.5
Battlefield Hardline45.831.4
Dragon Age: Inquisition32.621.4
F1 20147552
Sims 4123.435.7
Battlefield 442.929.919.1
Metro: Last Light29.121.212.4
BioShock Infinite4225218.2
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm43.925.910
Tomb Raider54.82821.5
Diablo III66.142.334.221.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
16
12
6
1
20
12

11
1

4








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 27. 09:56:37

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.042s ... 0.043s

#4 composed specs +0s ... 0.043s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.043s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7230 +0.028s ... 0.071s

#8 got single benchmarks 7230 +0.027s ... 0.098s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.487s ... 0.585s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.585s

#12 Got 87 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.594s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.594s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.03s ... 0.624s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +1s ... 1.625s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.628s

#17 return log +0s ... 1.628s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon R5 M430 graphics card

联想 Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE 笔记本电脑简短评测

联想 Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE 笔记本电脑简短评测

瑕疵。 这台Ideapad售价约500欧元(约3633人民币)。它的好处是提供了强劲的Kaby Lake处理器和双通道内存以及大容量硬盘。不过,它较弱的机身坚固度和昏暗的镜面屏幕却带来了不小的问题。...
Intel Core i5-7200U | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | 17.30" | 3 kg
联想 Yoga 510-14IKB 变形本简短评测

联想 Yoga 510-14IKB 变形本简短评测

不完美。 联想在这台最新14寸变形中搭配了一块几乎毫无意义的独立显卡。值得庆幸的是它的其他组件都让它十分适合移动办公用途。在接下来的评测中,我们将会考察它的电池续航以及比较它与同类产品表现如何。...
Intel Core i5-7200U | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | 14.00" | 1.7 kg

Dell Inspiron 15 3567-1144: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 3567-1144

Dell Latitude 3480-7775: Intel Core i5-6200U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 3480-7775

Lenovo IdeaPad V310-15-80T30070RK: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad V310-15-80T30070RK

Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB-80VB00BASP: Intel Core i3-7100U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB-80VB00BASP

HP 15-bs045ns: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP 15-bs045ns

HP 15-ay145ns: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP 15-ay145ns

Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB-80VB004PSP: Intel Core i5-7200U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB-80VB004PSP

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ABR 80ST0023SP: AMD A10-9600P, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ABR 80ST0023SP

HP 14-Am100Ur: Intel Core i5-7200U, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP 14-Am100Ur

HP 17-X044Ur: Intel Core i3-6006U, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP 17-X044Ur

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 80SM00LEGE: Intel Core i5-6200U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 80SM00LEGE

HP 348 G4: Intel Core i7-7500U, 14.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP 348 G4

Lenovo Yoga 510-14ISK-80S700ADGE: Intel Core i5-6200U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 510-14ISK-80S700ADGE

Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB: Intel Core i5-7200U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB

HP 15-ay036nl: Intel Core i5-6200U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP 15-ay036nl

HP 14-am015tx: Intel Core i5-6200U, 14.00", 2 kg
  External Review » HP 14-am015tx

Acer Aspire E5-523-6366: AMD A6-9210, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E5-523-6366

HP 17-X007UR: Intel Pentium N3710, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP 17-X007UR

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter