结论--最佳双屏可折叠机型,不仅因为 Panther Lake
华硕对其 ZenBook Duo UX4807 进行了大规模的重新设计,消除了旧机型的若干弱点。首先是新的铰链设计,使两个屏幕靠得更近。现在,把机器像书本一样打开使用会更加舒适。虽然这款新机型略厚,但在某种程度上却更轻。只要确保你能真正用好这两个屏幕,否则购买如此(相对)厚重的系统就没有什么意义了。
从根本上说,双屏幕的概念非常好用,画质也得到了进一步提升。优化的软件和丰富的桌面设置方法使 ZenBook Duo 的用途非常广泛。它的磁性键盘提供了出色的输入体验。新的手写笔也非常好用,电池续航时间也非常出色。
第二大亮点当然是英特尔公司推出的全新 Panther Lake 移动处理器,它的表现也没有让人失望。它具有速度更快的箭湖处理器的多核性能,但功耗明显降低。因此,它是前两个系列--箭湖(Arrow Lake)和月湖(Lunar Lake)的成功结合。有了新的图形适配器,性能大幅提升了约 70%,这是相当可观的。要知道,快速的 B390 iGPU 仅限于少数 Panther Lake 芯片。对于 ZenBook Duo 来说,这意味着你必须选择售价 2599 欧元的顶级 SKU,因为售价 2299 欧元的基本型的 iGPU 性能明显较弱。
总而言之,ZenBook UX8407 是市场上最好的双屏可折叠电脑,绝对物有所值。它几乎没有任何真正的弱点,不过令人讨厌的是,欧盟国家的包装盒里没有电源适配器。这可能是欧洲人必须习惯的。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在德国,新款 ZenBook Duo UX8407 可从华硕网站预订,建议零售价为 2,599 欧元(按 2026 年 1 月底汇率计算,约合人民币 3,080 元)。.2 月 18 日开始发货。
华硕在 2026 年对其双屏 ZenBook Duo 可折叠本进行了大幅改版,现在采用了 144 Hz 的新型高分辨率 OLED 面板,两款产品都采用了这种面板。此外,英特尔公司还推出了新的 Panther Lake CPU,不过两款产品在这方面还是有区别的。基本型号售价 2299 欧元,配备 32GB 内存和 1TB SSD,搭载酷睿 Ultra 9 386H,其 iGPU 速度较慢,运算块较少。只有售价 2599 欧元的顶级型号(32GB 内存、2TB 固态硬盘)配备了 酷睿至尊 X9 388H和快速的 Arc B390 iGPU。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 铝制和新铰链
说到外壳的重新设计,你首先注意到的是新的大型铰链。它的尺寸更小,而且大部分被隐藏了起来,这就是为什么 Zenbook 打开时两个显示屏之间的距离比以前明显缩小的原因。铰链调节良好,只允许最小程度的倾斜。最大打开角度为 180 度。
基本概念--两个相同的显示屏和一个可拆卸键盘--没有改变。这意味着 ZenBook Duo 的用途再次变得非常广泛,您可以从下面的图片中看到这一点。集成的 Screen Expert 软件可以轻松地扩展屏幕内容或将其镜像为演示模式,这样两个面对面的人就可以看到相同的内容,这就是一个可能的使用实例。
集成的脚架现在似乎比以前更稳定了。去年我们曾担心过的一个问题,即 "桌面模式"(像书本一样展开并垂直放置)有些摇晃,现在已经不再是问题了。
制造质量非常出色,我们已经从其他 Zenbook 上了解到的铝合金材料给人留下了非常高品质的印象。它对指纹也不特别敏感,而且非常稳定,在有意用力时不会产生扭曲或吱吱嘎嘎的声音。键盘也是如此,它通过磁力牢固地吸附在下部显示屏上,并通过 pogo 销连接(以及自动充电)。
双屏幕系统实际上非常实用,但也很笨重(无脚垫时厚度约为 2.3 厘米,有脚垫时约为 2.7 厘米),而且重量也不轻,仅为 1.7 千克。这与传统的 14 英寸笔记本电脑有明显区别,而且新机型也比上一代产品略厚。
功能 - 雷电 4
端口选择不变。除了两个支持 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 端口外,还有一个普通的 USB-A 端口和一个 HDMI 端口。两个 USB-C 端口中的一个现在位于右侧,这样就可以从两侧为设备充电。仍然没有读卡器。集成的 Wi-Fi 模块(BE201)支持 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4,在我们的测试中,传输速率高且稳定,没有信号质量问题。
集成的 1080p 网络摄像头包括一个红外传感器,但没有光圈。图像质量一般。
| Networking | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

配件
除了一支活动笔之外,顶级 SKU 型号还配有一个配套的黑色笔记本电脑套,供旅行时使用。
据我们所知,欧盟销售的产品不包括电源装置。
维护
输入设备 - 1.7 毫米按键
我们喜欢 前代机型的我们很喜欢前代机型的可拆卸键盘,2026 机型再次对其进行了改进。它现在更加坚固稳定,键程增加到 1.7 毫米,带来极其舒适的键入体验,因为在 "普通笔记本电脑 "模式下几乎没有任何弯曲。在 "普通笔记本电脑 "模式下,几乎不会有任何弯曲,因此你不会感觉到与在普通笔记本电脑上打字有任何区别。
总之,这是 14 英寸笔记本电脑上的最佳体验之一。集成的点击板(12.7 x 7.8 厘米)具有非常好的滑动性能,运行完美无瑕。边缘有额外的手势(如音量和亮度控制),但与触觉触控板不同的是,它不会产生振动。
在下部区域进行完全点击(非轻敲)时,会有良好的反馈,声音也不会特别大。
显示屏 - 2 个 OLED 面板,144 Hz
2025 年款的 ZenBook Duo 有两种不同的显示屏(全高清 60 Hz 或 3K 120 Hz),而华硕现在只使用高分辨率 16:10 OLED 面板,像素为 2,880 x 1,800 和 144 Hz。主观而言,图像质量非常出色,尽管有触摸网格层,但即使较亮的表面也不会出现颗粒感。如果需要,显示屏亮度可以自动调节,但色温无法调节。
响应时间非常快。无论亮度高低,都会出现频率为 720 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁。直流调光的亮度可达 70%;一旦进一步降低亮度,就会出现一条信息,说明直流调光不再可用,请使用 MyAsus 软件中的无闪烁 OLED 调光模式。如果能将这一功能集成到亮度控制中就更好了,这样用户就不必一直使用华硕工具。
使用的不是三星面板,而是京东方面板,其亮度比去年的机型高出很多。使用 SDR 内容时,亮度略低于 500 cd/m²。在 HDR 模式下,亮度接近 1,000 cd/m²。在我们的测量中,只有在环境光传感器激活的情况下才能达到这一数值;否则,HDR 的最大亮度将降至 640 cd/m²左右。我们已就这一问题与华硕取得联系,有可能通过更新进行修改。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 497 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
88.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6567 K
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA NB140B9M-T01, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 144 Hz | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA SDC419D, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 LEN140WQ+, 2x, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 N140JLG-GT3, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI AUO8FB5, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W TL134ADXP03, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4", 180 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 1% | 1% | -19% | -12% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.5 | 98.4 -1% | 99.6 0% | 99.9 0% | 67.8 -32% | 76.7 -23% | 95.1 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 97.2 -3% | 98.2 -2% | 99.6 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 88.7 | 86.7 -2% | 91.8 3% | 92.2 4% | 69.8 -21% | 78.2 -12% | 89.7 1% |
| Response Times | -214% | -143% | -81% | -11865% | -12462% | -1464% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.26 ? | 1.51 ? -481% | 0.77 ? -196% | 0.6 ? -131% | 44.6 ? -17054% | 49.2 ? -18823% | 5.4 ? -1977% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.4 ? | 1.36 ? -240% | 0.76 ? -90% | 1 ? -150% | 27.1 ? -6675% | 24.8 ? -6100% | 4.2 ? -950% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 720 ? | 480 ? | 480 ? | 480 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 70 | 14 80% | 43 39% | ||||
| Screen | 3% | 2% | -5% | -23% | -59% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 497 | 359 -28% | 381 -23% | 381.7 -23% | 459 -8% | 572 15% | 518 4% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 495 | 362 -27% | 384 -22% | 398 -20% | 455 -8% | 541 9% | 489 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 98 2% | 98 2% | 94 -2% | 89 -7% | 78 -19% | 91 -5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.24 | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.2 25% | 1.6 -0% | 2.93 -83% | 3.14 -96% | 4.19 -162% | 1.5 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.5 | 3.2 29% | 2 56% | 5.93 -32% | 6.55 -46% | 8.65 -92% | 4 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 0.61 59% | 0.58 61% | 2.11 -41% | 1.1 27% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 2.1 16% | 2.6 -4% | 0.8 68% | 3.9 -56% | 5.65 -126% | 1.6 36% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.16 102% | 2.45 90% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6567 99% | 6433 101% | 6784 96% | 6404 101% | 5867 111% | 5959 109% | 6536 99% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1913 | 2860 | 1727 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -71% /
-52% | -47% /
-25% | -28% /
-21% | -3969% /
-1995% | -4178% /
-2115% | -485% /
-238% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.21 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.15 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 720 Hz Amplitude: 70 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 720 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 720 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8070 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - 英特尔豹湖
测试条件
与往常一样,华硕提供了各种性能配置文件,可通过 Fn+F 组合键方便地进行切换。下面列出了这些配置文件。性能 模式用于性能测试。
| 能源概况 | TDP | CB2024 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 1080p Ultra | 最大风扇噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 耳语模式 | 35/20 瓦 | 868 点 | 6,224 点 | 35.9 FPS | 32.2 dB(A) |
| 平衡 | 64/28 瓦 | 1,057 点 | 7,146 点 | 47.7 FPS | 39 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 64/46 瓦 | 1,172 分 | 7,190 分 | 47.7 FPS | 45.9 dB(A) |
| 电池 | 64/46 瓦 | 1,158 点 | 7,189 点 | 47.7 FPS | 45.9 dB(A) |
处理器 - Core Ultra X9 388H
测试的 ZenBook Duo 配备了 Core Ultra X9 388H.这是英特尔全新 Panther Lake 系列中速度最快的移动处理器。
功耗限制分别设置为 64 瓦和 46 瓦(短期、长期),总体而言,机器的性能非常出色。效率方面的改进在多核任务中尤为明显,因为新芯片的性能值是箭湖芯片在大幅提高功耗目标的情况下才能达到的。更多详情,包括大量的效率测量和比较,请参阅这篇详细的 388H CPU 分析文章.
无论是在连续负载还是在电池状态下,性能都相当稳定。因此,在可折叠领域,新款 ZenBook Duo 的性能仅次于 ROG Flow Z13,因为 AMD 的 Strix Halo 处理器飞得太高,Panther Lake 无法企及。
Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI -2! | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (794 - 1172, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (420 - 1648, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average of class Convertible (88 - 129.8, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (1317 - 29063, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (740 - 2188, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (595 - 11357, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (273 - 834, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (478 - 4830, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 317, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (107 - 1051, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (12977 - 121368, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6655, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (17694 - 17924, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2291 - 21269, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (3020 - 3066, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (1003 - 3020, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (1608 - 22023, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (806 - 2275, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (3.43 - 36.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (42.5 - 84.3, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.3985 - 0.84, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (1480 - 64158, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (11392 - 183760, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (797 - 8151, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (14686 - 145339, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (1120 - 29155, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (4929 - 97193, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (5271 - 139734, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (218 - 2001, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (1169 - 34297, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (14193 - 81626, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
系统性能
Zenbook Duo 的系统性能非常出色,新的 Panther Lake 系统在合成基准测试中名列前茅。无论使用一个屏幕还是两个屏幕,我们都没有发现任何稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 -1! | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (3229 - 10123, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (7233 - 12222, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (5062 - 17914, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (2496 - 16551, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (524 - 2274, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (554 - 1942, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (550 - 2949, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (381 - 1719, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (171 - 426, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (91.2 - 317, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Convertible (407 - 1089, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 10123 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (19931 - 130626, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (17473 - 216896, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Zenbook Duo 的主板上有一个普通的 M.2 2280 插槽,通过 PCIe 4.0 连接。测试设备使用的是三星公司生产的 2 TB SSD,首次启动后可用容量为 1.77 TB。其传输速率非常好,而且也很稳定。
* ... smaller is better
固态硬盘压力测试:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
更高端的 Panther Lake 芯片配备了快速的 Arc B390它提供 12 个最新一代的 Xe 内核,无疑是英特尔新芯片中的亮点。与老款产品相比,蓝队成功地大幅提升了图形性能,如 Arc Graphics 140T.
在合成测试中,B390 的优势约为 70%,这意味着它不再远远落后于 AMD Strix Halo 芯片的 Radeon 8050。此外,其Time Spy 分数可与 60 瓦版的GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 GPU 相媲美,其他测试也显示了类似的情况。只有在旧的 3DMark 11 基准测试中,性能提升并不特别显著。
有关全新 B390 GPU 的更多信息,包括广泛的性能和效率测量,请参阅本专门的 分析文章.
GPU 性能在持续负载和电池状态下均保持稳定。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19256 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14605 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7807 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1667 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 6338 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Convertible (163 - 2067, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (282 - 288, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Convertible (147 - 423, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
新的 B390 iGPU新的 B390 iGPU 非常适合游戏,与配备了即将发布的 Arc Graphics 140T 的旧款 ZenBook Duo 相比,我们再次看到了约 70% 的优势。AMD 强大的 Strix Halo iGPU 仍然明显更快,但与GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本 GPU 相比,快慢因游戏而异。例如,在《赛博朋克 2077》和《博德之门 3》等现代游戏中,B390 只比 60 瓦版的 RTX 4050 稍逊一筹。
借助XeSS3 的新帧生成功能,帧速率可以进一步提高,在我们的初步测试中,图像质量非常好。我们相信你真的可以使用这项技术。我们能够让《刺客信条:暗影》等要求苛刻的游戏在 1080p 下以中等细节(选择平衡配置文件)运行得更快,达到约 100 FPS。我们计划在接下来的几天里对其他游戏进行更多测试。
| 游戏 | 原生 | MFGx2 | MFGx3 | MFGx4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 赛博朋克 2077 1080p 超高清 | 47.7 FPS | 83.5 FPS | 111.3 FPS | 121.5 FPS |
| F1 25 1080p Ultra | 30 FPS | 51 FPS | 74 FPS | 93 FPS |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 113.8 | 45.1 | 30.6 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 154.5 | 102.3 | 109.8 | 111.8 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 134.8 | 83 | 54.1 | 43.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 51.8 | 47.5 | 41.2 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 400 | 141.2 | 103.4 | 99.4 | 68 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 180 | 87 | 81 | 70 | 48 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 68.2 | 52.3 | 45.7 | 44.6 | 31.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 78.7 | 63.9 | 54 | 47.7 | 28.9 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 225 | 150.3 | 108.9 | 91.9 | 62 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 145.2 | 134.3 | 104.7 | 38.6 | 25.4 |
| Civilization 7 (2025) | 267 | 154.2 | 98.8 | 69.8 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 34 | 33 | 29 | 21 | 18 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 147.8 | 121 | 92.8 | ||
| Battlefield 6 (2025) | 62 | 54.4 | 46.9 | 34.8 | 25 |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 58 | 42.9 | 30.4 | 17.7 | 12.3 |
排放量
噪音排放
冷却声音的大小主要取决于所选的功率曲线。在日常和要求不高的任务中,即使选择了最快的功率曲线,机器总体上仍然非常安静。不过,在较高负载情况下,与上一代机型相比,功率限制较高。 上一代机型风扇的噪音明显增大,分别为 45.9 分贝(A)和 39.8 分贝(A)。
选择较低的功率曲线时,华硕的噪音要小得多(平衡:39 dB(A),低声:32.2 dB(A)),但其性能值仍优于前代产品。
在测试机上工作时,没有感觉到线圈啸叫。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25 / 25 / 25 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36.4 / 45.9 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | 3% | 8% | 17% | 3% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25 | 23.6 6% | 23.9 4% | 23.3 7% | 23 8% | 23.6 6% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25 | 23.6 6% | 23.9 4% | 23.3 7% | 23 8% | 23.6 6% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25 | 23.6 6% | 23.9 4% | 23.3 7% | 23 8% | 23.6 6% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25 | 23.6 6% | 23.9 4% | 23.3 7% | 23 8% | 23.6 6% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 36.4 | 39.8 -9% | 39.1 -7% | 38 -4% | 27.14 25% | 37.5 -3% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 45.9 | 39.8 13% | 42 8% | 37.8 18% | 31.65 31% | 45.4 1% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 45.9 | 39.8 13% | 44.5 3% | 40.6 12% | 31.65 31% | 45.4 1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the class Convertible.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | -13% | 1% | 1% | -12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 35.3 | 35.3 -0% | 38.2 -8% | 40 -13% | 36 -2% | 42.5 -20% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 44.3 | 47.2 -7% | 38.8 12% | 38.6 13% | 41 7% | 44.9 -1% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 25.5 | 24.8 3% | 32.6 -28% | 25 2% | 26 -2% | 29.6 -16% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 26.7 | 26.2 2% | 33.8 -27% | 26.6 -0% | 27 -1% | 29.5 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
与前代产品一样,华硕这款新系统也采用了非常出色的扬声器。低音还可以更有力一些,但这只是我们过于苛求了。在这里观看视频或播放音乐时,绝对不会渴望使用全尺寸的外置扬声器。
Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能量管理--充沛的体力
能源消耗
众所周知,OLED 面板的功耗会随着显示内容的不同而变化,而 Zenbook Duo 的第二块面板在这方面自然也有很大影响。在 "普通笔记本 "模式下,默认壁纸的最大空闲功耗为 10.2 瓦。激活第二块显示屏后,功耗上升到 18 瓦左右。如果使用较暗的壁纸,则分别降至 6.7 瓦和 12 瓦。
在负载情况下,我们可以看到最大功率为 96 瓦,约 45 秒后迅速降至 80 瓦。在欧盟以外的地区,Zenbook Duo 配备的是 100 瓦的电源,看起来足够强劲。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL82T0HBL1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-1T00-1006, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4" | Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | -29% | 43% | 30% | -70% | 18% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.8 | 4.1 15% | 9.9 -106% | 1.5 69% | 2.9 40% | 10.4 -117% | 4.15 ? 14% | 4.44 ? 7% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 9.8 | 8.2 16% | 11.6 -18% | 4.8 51% | 8.2 16% | 17 -73% | 6.9 ? 30% | 7.42 ? 24% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 10.2 | 8.7 15% | 23.2 -127% | 5 51% | 8.6 16% | 17.3 -70% | 7.75 ? 24% | 9.78 ? 4% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 47.3 | 56.7 -20% | 58.5 -24% | 44.2 7% | 39.6 16% | 92.9 -96% | 45.5 ? 4% | 45 ? 5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 75.3 | 47 38% | 56.6 25% | 39.3 48% | 36.4 52% | 113.2 -50% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 76.3 | 48.7 36% | 58.5 23% | 47.8 37% | 41.9 45% | 109.3 -43% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 96 | 65.1 32% | 70.1 27% | 60.2 37% | 70 27% | 138.1 -44% | 79.7 ? 17% | 67.6 ? 30% |
* ... smaller is better
能耗、赛博朋克 2077 / 压力测试
带外部监控器的能耗
电池寿命
华硕通过将电池集成到机身上部,将该机的电池容量从 75 Wh 大幅提高到 99 Wh。整体而言,运行时间非常出色,尤其是考虑到高分辨率 OLED 屏幕的良好画质。一些竞争对手也能实现较长的续航时间,但它们使用的全高清面板要弱得多。
我们在双屏显示和单屏显示的情况下进行了常规的 Wi-Fi 网页浏览测试。在亮度为 150 cd/m² 的情况下,我们可以记录 17 小时(1 台显示屏)和略低于 12 小时(2 台显示屏)的运行时间。在全 SDR 亮度下,一台显示屏可使用 11 小时,两台显示屏可使用 8 小时以上。在一台显示屏打开并设置为 150 cd/m² 的情况下,视频播放时间可超过 21 小时。
| 1 台显示器 | 2 台显示器 | |
|---|---|---|
| 150 cd/m² | 1 022 分钟 | 713 分钟 |
| 最大亮度 | 664 分钟 | 489 分钟 |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 99 Wh | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, 88 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 68 Wh | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, 70 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -28% | -64% | 29% | -2% | -49% | -28% | |
| H.264 (h) | 21.4 | 16.9 -21% | 20.6 -4% | 12.7 -41% | 15.5 ? -28% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 17 | 11.1 -35% | 6.1 -64% | 22 29% | 18.4 8% | 9.3 -45% | 11.3 ? -34% |
| Load (h) | 2.3 | 2.1 -9% | 0.9 -61% | 1.811 ? -21% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
- 01/25/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Intel Core Ultra X9 388H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,469.99 ASUS Zenbook Duo ux8406 AI P... 2. $1,692.00 ASUS Zenbook Duo Laptop, Dua... 3. $1,899.99 ASUS Zenbook DUO AI Powered ... List Price: 2599€ | 1.7 kg | 23.4 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,692.00 List Price: 2099€ | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,599.00 | 1.2 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $1,761.14 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Ge... 2. $1,761.14 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Ge... 3. $2,099.00 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Ge... List Price: 2300 USD | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,185.20 List Price: 2889 Euro | 1.5 kg | 14.7 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8060S ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $109.99 ROG 200W Charger for Asus RO... 2. $59.99 PowerPortnerLink 130W USB C ... 3. $3,099.00 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... List Price: 2499€ | 1.6 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.40" 2560x1600 225 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

































































