与最新的 XPS 16 相比,选择戴尔 16 Premium 的两大理由

与去年的 戴尔 16 Premium的 2026 XPS 16无疑是更轻、更安静、更持久、更高效的机型,能更好地满足更多普通用户的需求。不过,对性能要求较高的用户可能还是会考虑老款的戴尔 16 Premium,原因有以下几点,因为该机型具有一些其后续机型所不具备的显著特点。
1.戴尔 16 Premium 配备更大、分辨率更高的显示屏
新款 XPS 16 最高可配置 16.0 英寸 120 Hz 3.2K OLED 触摸屏,而戴尔 16 Premium 最高可配置 16.3 英寸 120 Hz 4K OLED 触摸屏,以获得更大的屏幕空间。更稠密的像素和稍大的屏幕尺寸尤其有利于同时打开多个窗口或处理大型电子表格的用户。
对于一小部分对闪烁敏感的用户来说,两款机型的 PWM 表现也不尽相同。XPS 16 OLED 屏幕的平均闪烁频率为 240 Hz,而戴尔 16 Premium OLED 屏幕的平均闪烁频率为 491 Hz,这意味着较新机型更容易造成眼睛疲劳。
2.戴尔 16 Premium 仍提供更快的 CPU 和 GPU 性能
从每瓦性能的角度来看,Panther Lake X7 确实令人印象深刻,但它在 CPU 原始马力方面落后于 Arrow Lake。多线程性能 酷睿至尊 7 255H的多线程性能比 Core Ultra X7 358H快 20%,这可能会吸引一些高能用户。
在 GPU 方面,戴尔 16 Premium 最引人注目的可能是其可选的 GeForce RTX 5070GPU 的性能绝对超越 Arc B390的优势。这并不是说新的英特尔解决方案速度慢,而是说集成的 GPU 无法与独立的 RTX 解决方案相抗衡。因此,铁杆内容创作者或游戏玩家可能会发现,即将推出的戴尔 16 Premium 在这方面更有价值。
请记住,以上对比的是最高配置的戴尔 16 Premium 和 XPS 16。如果你是大多数喜欢中档规格而不喜欢独立显卡的用户,那么更新、更轻的 XPS 16 可能是两者中更明智的选择。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (17457 - 19841, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2079 - 2087, n=5) | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (6848 - 7749, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (780 - 792, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2986 - 3135, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (292 - 312, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (175 - 218, n=5) | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (58746 - 68533, n=5) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (6170 - 6526, n=5) | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Multi-Core | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (15698 - 17121, n=6) | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Single-Core | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2836 - 2927, n=6) | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (16310 - 17028, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2097 - 2142, n=5) | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (19.5 - 23.1, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (44.8 - 51.9, n=5) | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (0.4127 - 0.4279, n=6) | |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (18261 - 18819, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (16560 - 17498, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (4567 - 7190, n=13) | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Score | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (7270 - 7807, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| Blender | |
| v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (282 - 389, n=6) | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (105 - 110, n=3) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| v4.3 Barbershop CPU | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1382 - 1711, n=5) | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
| v4.3 Barbershop oneAPI | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (369 - 397, n=3) | |
| v4.3 Barbershop OPTIX | |
| Dell 16 Premium DA16250 | |
* ... smaller is better







