Notebookcheck Logo

英特尔豹湖酷睿™ Ultra X9 388H 性能分析--效率超越 Arrow Lake,超越 Zen 5

英特尔公司代号为 Panther Lake 的新移动处理器旨在提供更高的性能和效率。我们用酷睿 Ultra X9 388H 测试了最新的顶级型号,以了解新一代处理器在性能和效率方面的真正优势。
AI CPU Intel Laptop / Notebook Panther Lake Thunderbolt

英特尔在 CES 上展示了新的 Panther Lake 移动处理器系列。去年的 Arrow Lake 和 Lunar Lake 是双管齐下,而现在的 Panther Lake 则是要提供两全其美的产品,即最佳性能和高效率。AMD 也刚刚发布了新的 Ryzen AI 400 系列移动处理器,我们已经对其进行了广泛的测试。现在,让我们来看看全新英特尔酷睿 Ultra X9 388H 的 CPU 性能和效率。关于 Panther Lake 新一代集成显卡的性能分析,我们将在另一篇文章中进行介绍:

英特尔豹湖系列概述

新的 Panther Lake 移动处理器再次由不同的芯片组成,其中计算芯片由英特尔自己生产(英特尔 18A)。根据型号的不同,总共可使用多达 16 个内核:4 个快速 P 核心(Cougar Cove)、8 个 E 核心(Darkmont)和 4 个额外的低功耗 E 核心(Darkmont)。此外,还安装了 46-50 TOPS 的 NPU,这意味着所有 Panther Lake 处理器都达到了微软 Copilot+ 认证的最低要求。台积电(TSMC)生产另外两块芯片(平台控制器和 GPU)。

酷睿 Ultra X(图片来源:英特尔)
酷睿 Ultra X(图片来源:英特尔)

不同型号在内存方面存在差异。配备快速图形处理器的 Core Ultra X 芯片只能使用 LPDDR5x 内存(8533 或 9600 MT/s),最大容量为 96 GB。而配备小型 iGPU 的其他型号则可与 LPDDR5x 内存(6800 至 8533 MT/s)或 SO-DIMM 模块(6400 至 7200 MT/s)组合使用,最大支持 128 GB 内存。

新的 Panther Lake 芯片设计的 TDP 范围为 25 至最大 80 瓦。在我们看来,这是一个优势,因为 Arrow Lake 芯片极高的功耗限制(最高 115 瓦)已成为过去。

芯片 - 概述(图片来源:英特尔)
芯片 - 概述(图片来源:英特尔)

测试系统

作为 Core Ultra X9 388H 的测试系统,我们使用了华硕 Zenbook Duo UX8407。 广泛测试之前我们已经对其进行了广泛测试。在这里,该处理器搭配 32 GB 快速 LPDDR5x-9600 内存,功耗限制为 64/46 瓦。因此,将会有更快的执行速度。

华硕 Zenbook Duo UX8407
华硕 Zenbook Duo UX8407
CPU-Z:Core Ultra X9 388H
CPU-Z:Core Ultra X9 388H

测试条件

为了在不同处理器之间进行有意义的比较,我们同时考虑了功耗和合成基准测试中的实际性能,然后从中确定效率。功耗测量总是在外部显示器上进行,以消除内部显示器之间的差异这一影响因素。不过,我们在这里测量的是系统的整体功耗,而不仅仅是比较纯粹的 TDP 值。

单核性能和效率

我们先来看看单核性能,在这方面,新的 Panther Lake 处理器仅略微领先于其前代产品。这使它成为目前该 TDP 范围内速度最快的移动处理器,除了Apple 的 M4 和 M5 两代处理器,它们的性能完全不同。速度最快的骁龙 X 处理器 X1E-84-100 也以微弱优势落败,而新的 AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 则慢了约 8%。

Performance rating: Percent | Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | Geekbench 6.5: Single-Core
Performance rating
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, 30.5, 27.5
100 pt
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
88.4 pt
Apple M4 (10 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, 24, 24
86 pt
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 64, 46
67.4 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
RedmiBook Pro 14 2025, 115, 45
65.7 pt
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG, 115, 45
65.4 pt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, 0, 0
64.5 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, 37, 30
64.2 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake, 37, 30
64 pt
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA, 63, 41
63.8 pt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon, 50, 35
63.3 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10, 37, 25
62.5 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
62.3 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, 37, 25
62.2 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
MagicBook Art 14 2025, 40, 26
62.1 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
ProArt P16 H7606WI, 0, 0
62 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10, 85, 70
61.8 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 45, 35
61.5 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9, 60, 54
60.9 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W, 33, 28
60.6 pt
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, 35, 20
57.7 pt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
OmniBook X 14, 0, 0
55.4 pt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
Surface Laptop 13, 45, 35
53.7 pt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, 0, 0
48.6 pt
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, 30.5, 27.5
200 Points
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
176 Points
Apple M4 (10 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, 24, 24
174 Points
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 64, 46
129.8 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
RedmiBook Pro 14 2025, 115, 45
127.6 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, 0, 0
127 Points
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG, 115, 45
127 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, 37, 30
124.9 Points
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA, 63, 41
124.2 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake, 37, 30
123.3 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon, 50, 35
123 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10, 37, 25
121 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, 37, 25
119.7 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
MagicBook Art 14 2025, 40, 26
119 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
116.5 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
ProArt P16 H7606WI, 0, 0
116 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10, 85, 70
115.2 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 45, 35
115 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W, 33, 28
113.6 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9, 60, 54
113.5 Points
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, 35, 20
112.5 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
Surface Laptop 13, 45, 35
109 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
OmniBook X 14, 0, 0
108 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, 0, 0
96 Points
Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, 30.5, 27.5
4326 Points
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
3844 Points
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
3837 Points
Apple M4 (10 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, 24, 24
3673 Points
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 64, 46
3020 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
RedmiBook Pro 14 2025, 115, 45
2923 Points
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG, 115, 45
2912 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
2874 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake, 37, 30
2871 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
ProArt P16 H7606WI, 0, 0
2857 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, 37, 30
2855 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10, 85, 70
2854 Points
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA, 63, 41
2836 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, 0, 0
2834 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 45, 35
2834 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9, 60, 54
2815 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon, 50, 35
2813 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
MagicBook Art 14 2025, 40, 26
2797 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, 37, 25
2795 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10, 37, 25
2789 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W, 33, 28
2785 Points
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, 35, 20
2562 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
OmniBook X 14, 0, 0
2454 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
Surface Laptop 13, 45, 35
2287 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, 0, 0
2126 Points
Performance rating: Percent | Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | Geekbench 6.5: Single-Core

要达到这样的性能水平,X9 388H 大约需要 11-12 瓦,相当于 13-15 瓦的封装功率。这意味着 Panther Lake 芯片在单核情况下的效率要高于其 Arrow Lake 前代产品和 AMD 的 Zen 5 芯片。不过,Lunar Lake CPU 仍略胜一筹,就像高通和Apple 的整个 ARM 竞争产品一样。

Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple M4 (10 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, 24, 24
13.6 Points per Watt
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, 30.5, 27.5
13.1 Points per Watt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
Surface Laptop 13, 45, 35
9.73 Points per Watt
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
9.24 Points per Watt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, 0, 0
8.28 Points per Watt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
OmniBook X 14, 0, 0
7.77 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10, 37, 25
6.47 Points per Watt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, 0, 0
6.32 Points per Watt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon, 50, 35
5.86 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, 35, 20
5.77 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, 37, 30
5.68 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake, 37, 30
5.43 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, 37, 25
5.25 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 64, 46
5.17 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
RedmiBook Pro 14 2025, 115, 45
4.62 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 45, 35
4.39 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
4.13 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10, 85, 70
4.04 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9, 60, 54
4.01 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
MagicBook Art 14 2025, 40, 26
3.83 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG, 115, 45
3.76 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W, 33, 28
3.64 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
ProArt P16 H7606WI, 0, 0
3.4 Points per Watt
Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Single Power (external Monitor)
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
ProArt P16 H7606WI, 0, 0
34.1 (30.9min, 32.1P1 - 51.4max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG, 115, 45
33.8 (28.9min, 30.9P1 - 84.6max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W, 33, 28
31.2 (28.6min, 29.4P1 - 41max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
MagicBook Art 14 2025, 40, 26
31.1 (25.7min, 27.2P1 - 39.8max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10, 85, 70
28.5 (23.6min, 26.4P1 - 54max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9, 60, 54
28.3 (24.6min, 25.9P1 - 45.7max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
28.2 (24.7min, 25.7P1 - 47.7max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
28.1 (24.5min, 26.2P1 - 69.1max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
RedmiBook Pro 14 2025, 115, 45
27.6 (22.5min, 24.9P1 - 48.7max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 45, 35
26.2 (24.2min, 25P1 - 47.1max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 64, 46
25.1 (21.9min, 22.6P1 - 37.3max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, 37, 25
22.8 (19min, 20.6P1 - 25.7max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake, 37, 30
22.7 (18.3min, 19.7P1 - 36.2max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, 37, 30
22 (18.9min, 19.5P1 - 41.3max) Watt *
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon, 50, 35
21 (17.4min, 18.3P1 - 28.2max) Watt *
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, 0, 0
20.1 (13.1min, 17.2P1 - 34max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, 35, 20
19.5 (17.5min, 17.9P1 - 26.2max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10, 37, 25
18.7 (14.8min, 15.8P1 - 27.8max) Watt *
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
18.4 (16.8min, 17.4P1 - 36.7max) Watt *
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, 30.5, 27.5
15.3 (14.3min, 14.4P1 - 18.8max) Watt *
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
OmniBook X 14, 0, 0
13.9 (12.6min, 12.8P1 - 26.8max) Watt *
Apple M4 (10 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, 24, 24
12.8 (11.5min, 11.9P1 - 14.4max) Watt *
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, 0, 0
11.6 (10.4min, 10.7P1 - 16.2max) Watt *
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
Surface Laptop 13, 45, 35
11.2 (9.99min, 10.4P1 - 27.4max) Watt *

* ... smaller is better

多核性能

在多核测试中,性能也有所提升,只有速度极快的 Arrow Lake 芯片和功耗限制较高的 Zen 5 CPU 才能跟上新的 X9 388H,不过这里的功耗限制明显降低,为 64/46 瓦。在纯粹的性能方面,Lunar Lake CPU 完全被甩在了后面,而 X9 388H 的速度几乎是它们的两倍。其性能也与Apple M5 SoC 相当,但后者的功耗限制要低得多(最大 30 瓦)。

Performance rating: Percent | Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core
Performance rating
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
99.4 pt
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, 30.5, 27.5
85 pt
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 64, 46
84.1 pt
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA, 63, 41
80 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
ProArt P16 H7606WI, 0, 0
79.5 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
RedmiBook Pro 14 2025, 115, 45
79.4 pt
Apple M4 (10 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, 24, 24
71.3 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9, 60, 54
69.2 pt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon, 50, 35
68.9 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 45, 35
68.8 pt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, 0, 0
68.5 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10, 85, 70
68.2 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
68.2 pt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W, 33, 28
65.4 pt
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA, 60, 35
63.6 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
MagicBook Art 14 2025, 40, 26
63.5 pt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
OmniBook X 14, 0, 0
61 pt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
Surface Laptop 13, 45, 35
52.4 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, 37, 30
49.4 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake, 37, 30
48.5 pt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, 0, 0
48.3 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10, 37, 25
47.2 pt
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, 37, 25
47 pt
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, 35, 20
42.2 pt
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
1435 Points
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
1403 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
ProArt P16 H7606WI, 0, 0
1213 Points
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, 30.5, 27.5
1172 Points
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 64, 46
1172 Points
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA, 63, 41
1125 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
RedmiBook Pro 14 2025, 115, 45
1053 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9, 60, 54
996 Points
Apple M4 (10 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, 24, 24
986 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
977 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10, 85, 70
973 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 45, 35
953 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon, 50, 35
926 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W, 33, 28
921 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, 0, 0
866 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
OmniBook X 14, 0, 0
840 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
MagicBook Art 14 2025, 40, 26
810 Points
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA, 60, 35
740 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
Surface Laptop 13, 45, 35
723 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, 0, 0
646 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, 37, 30
619 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake, 37, 30
600 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10, 37, 25
580 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, 37, 25
574 Points
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, 35, 20
506 Points
Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
20458 Points
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
20385 Points
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, 30.5, 27.5
18054 Points
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 64, 46
17694 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
RedmiBook Pro 14 2025, 115, 45
17489 Points
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA, 63, 41
16674 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, 0, 0
15665 Points
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA, 60, 35
15476 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
ProArt P16 H7606WI, 0, 0
15221 Points
Apple M4 (10 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, 24, 24
15128 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon, 50, 35
14998 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 45, 35
14562 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
MagicBook Art 14 2025, 40, 26
14454 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9, 60, 54
14118 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10, 85, 70
14028 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
13988 Points
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W, 33, 28
13648 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
OmniBook X 14, 0, 0
12971 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, 37, 30
11388 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake, 37, 30
11279 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
Surface Laptop 13, 45, 35
11125 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, 37, 25
11037 Points
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10, 37, 25
11027 Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, 0, 0
10550 Points
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, 35, 20
10036 Points
Performance rating: Percent | Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core

说到多核效率,除了纯粹的性能外,还必须考虑 TDP 值。对于 X9 388H,除了标准功率限制外,我们还在 20、28、35 和 45 瓦的固定功率限制下进行了测量。我们还对新的 Ryzen AI 9 465 进行了 20、28 和 35 瓦的额外测量。当然,功率限制越低,效率越高。

新款 X9 388H 的效率整体上有所提高。例如,如果查看功率限制,可以发现 X9 在 45 瓦时的效率要高于 Ryzen AI 9 465 在 35 瓦时的效率,在 35 瓦时的效率也略高于 HX370 在 33/28 瓦时的效率。在极低的功率限制下,甚至几乎达到了Apple M4 的效率。

Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, 30.5, 27.5
27.5 Points per Watt
Apple M4 (10 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, 24, 24
24.8 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 20, 20
24.6 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 28, 28
22.3 Points per Watt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, 0, 0
22.1 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 20, 20
22.1 Points per Watt
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
21.8 Points per Watt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
OmniBook X 14, 0, 0
20.5 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 35, 35
19.9 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W, 33, 28
19.7 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA, 60, 35
18.5 Points per Watt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
Surface Laptop 13, 45, 35
18 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 28, 28
18 Points per Watt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, 0, 0
17.9 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 45, 45
17.2 Points per Watt
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon, 50, 35
17.1 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 35, 35
17 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 45, 35
16.8 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
MagicBook Art 14 2025, 40, 26
16.7 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 64, 46
16.2 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10, 37, 25
15.9 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, 37, 30
15 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, 35, 20
14.7 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, 37, 25
14.1 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
RedmiBook Pro 14 2025, 115, 45
12.9 Points per Watt
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake, 37, 30
12.7 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9, 60, 54
12.5 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
10.3 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
ProArt P16 H7606WI, 0, 0
10.2 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10, 85, 70
9.63 Points per Watt
Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Multi Power (external Monitor)
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
ProArt P16 H7606WI, 0, 0
119.3 (113.6min, 113.9P1 - 121.7max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10, 85, 70
101 (88.3min, 91.5P1 - 104.3max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, 65, 65
95 (82.2min, 84.7P1 - 98.7max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
RedmiBook Pro 14 2025, 115, 45
81.7 (68.4min, 68.8P1 - 101.8max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9, 60, 54
80 (76.7min, 77P1 - 86.8max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 64, 46
72.2 (66min, 66.8P1 - 89.8max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 45, 45
66.2 (53.8min, 63P1 - 68.5max) Watt *
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry, 0, 0
65.7 (22.8min, 60.2P1 - 73.1max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 45, 35
56.7 (53.3min, 53.8P1 - 68.6max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 35, 35
54.6 (52.7min, 53.2P1 - 56.9max) Watt *
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon, 50, 35
54 (46.8min, 47.8P1 - 67.4max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 35, 35
52.5 (50.1min, 50.7P1 - 54.6max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
MagicBook Art 14 2025, 40, 26
48.4 (44.2min, 44.5P1 - 64.9max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake, 37, 30
47.4 (41min, 42.5P1 - 57.3max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 28, 28
46.9 (44.8min, 44.9P1 - 49max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W, 33, 28
46.7 (28.4min, 29.3P1 - 55.2max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 28, 28
43.1 (41.7min, 41.8P1 - 44.3max) Watt *
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, 30.5, 27.5
42.6 (39.1min, 39.6P1 - 52.8max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, 37, 30
41.3 (38.9min, 39.6P1 - 41.6max) Watt *
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
OmniBook X 14, 0, 0
40.9 (29min, 29.2P1 - 68max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, 37, 25
40.8 (8.41min, 38.5P1 - 58.2max) Watt *
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
Surface Laptop 13, 45, 35
40.1 (33.7min, 36.4P1 - 52.7max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA, 60, 35
40 (35.4min, 35.5P1 - 65.3max) Watt *
Apple M4 (10 cores)
MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, 24, 24
39.8 (35.5min, 36.5P1 - 42.4max) Watt *
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, 0, 0
39.1 (35.6min, 36.4P1 - 61.3max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10, 37, 25
36.4 (33.4min, 34P1 - 51.2max) Watt *
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
ZenBook A14 UX3407QA, 0, 0
36.1 (27.6min, 30.2P1 - 45max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, 20, 20
34.8 (31.7min, 33.2P1 - 36.6max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, 35, 20
34.4 (27.9min, 28.9P1 - 53.8max) Watt *
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
ZenBook Duo UX8407AA, 20, 20
32.3 (29.7min, 31.3P1 - 33.5max) Watt *

* ... smaller is better

功率极限更低的性能

让我们仔细看看低功耗时的性能。在这里,你可以清楚地看到,即使在低功耗限制下,新款 X9 388H 的性能也比 AMD 的 Zen 5 型号更具优势,这是以前没有观察到的趋势。不过,与 Ryzen AI 9 HX370 的差距很小,所以英特尔在这里只是迎头赶上。尽管如此,我们可以明确地说,Panther Lake 可以很好地取代它的两个前辈(Arrow Lake 和 Lunar Lake),在低功耗的超薄设备中也是一个非常不错的选择。加上出色的 GPU 性能,Panther Lake 显然将成为 2026 年手持设备的最佳平台。

Cinebench 2024 Multi
Cinebench 2024 Multi
Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core
CPU 20 瓦 28 瓦 35 瓦 45 瓦
Intel Core Ultra X9 338H 794 分 959 分 1,043 分 1,136 分
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 597 分 778 分 892 分 977 分
英特尔酷睿至尊 7 255H 492 分 696 分 834 分 962 分
英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 512 分 587 分
英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H 438 分 637 分 752 分 887 分
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 768 分 842 分 930 分
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX370 760分 927分 1022分 1107分
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 350 604 分 739 分 813 分

结论:英特尔酷睿 Ultra X9 388H 更快、更高效

在新的 Panther Lake 移动处理器中,英特尔成功地将前两代产品 Arrow Lake 和 Lunar Lake 结合在一起,性能比 Arrow Lake 更好,同时效率也得到了提高。即使在低功耗限制下,性能也非常具有竞争力,因此英特尔(与新的图形处理器结合使用)是超薄笔记本电脑的最佳选择。

AMD 的 Zen 5 处理器在单核性能方面稍显落后,但 AMD 在多核性能方面仍具有竞争力。AppleAMD 当前的 M5 SoC 在多核性能方面处于同一水平,但效率更高,而单核性能则完全不同。即将推出的 M5 Pro SoC 肯定会提高多核和 GPU 性能的标准。

我们还需要再等一段时间才能看到 ARM 的新 Snapdragon 处理器,但这些处理器的性能可能会比 Panther Lake 更强。不过,搭载 Panther Lake 处理器的设备已经上市,目前是购买新笔记本电脑的最佳选择。

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 英特尔豹湖酷睿™ Ultra X9 388H 性能分析--效率超越 Arrow Lake,超越 Zen 5
Andreas Osthoff, 2026-01-27 (Update: 2026-01-27)