结论——英特尔 Arc G3 Extreme 堪称游戏规则的颠覆者
英特尔首款专为游戏设计的掌机芯片大获成功。其亮点不仅在于新款 Arc G3 Extreme 及其 Arc B390 集成显卡的高性能,更在于其在较低功耗下的表现,以及与帧生成等功能相结合的优势。 在1200p分辨率下以最高画质运行《赛博朋克2077》等3A大作,帧率稳定在约90帧,且电池续航时间接近四小时,这无疑是一项巨大的成就。
新款 MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ 相比其搭载 Lunar Lake 平台的前代机型,也是一次不错的升级。新机身握持起来更加舒适,配备了非常出色的输入设备、优质扬声器、两个 Thunderbolt 4 接口以及一个速度极快的 microSD Express 读卡器。 8英寸120Hz屏幕保持不变,依然非常适合游戏,但其主观画质无法与联想Legion Go 2等OLED竞品相媲美。 我们同样欣赏微星的软件系统,包括改进后的实时监控选项以及全面升级的快速设置菜单,这些功能与Xbox的集成配合得非常出色。
不过,该机型存在两大主要缺点。微星确实应该优化风扇的运行机制,因为风扇始终处于运转状态,即使在空闲时也是如此。 但最大的问题在于价格,因为新款 Claw 8 EX AI+ 的零售价高达 1799 美元,这确实相当昂贵。用这笔钱,你可以买到一台搭载 RTX 5060 的不错游戏本,如果运气好的话,甚至能买到搭载 RTX 5070 的 2025 款机型。 总而言之,新款 Claw 8 EX AI+ 确实令人印象深刻,但我们不确定会有多少人愿意为一款游戏掌机花费如此高昂的价钱。
Pros
Cons
技术规格
机箱、连接性和输入设备
微星(MSI)对 Claw 8 进行了彻底重新设计,如今它的外观更像是一款中央配备大屏幕的手柄。虽然手柄的造型不像华硕 ROG Xbox Ally X 那样极具未来感,但依然颇具辨识度,并提升了游戏时的舒适度。手柄两端以及背面均采用了纹理处理,以增强握持感。 微星为新款Claw的前面板采用了深紫色,虽然未必符合所有人的审美,但我们认为其外观确实非常出众。新机身还配备了一个标准M.2-2280插槽(此前为M.2-2230)。 摇杆依然配备RGB背光,按键、扳机键和摇杆的反馈手感依然出色。微星升级了振动马达,使得振动反馈更加精准,例如在《极限竞速:地平线6》中,你可以清晰感受到不同路面的差异,或是撞上ABS路面的区别。
在连接性方面表现出色,配备了两个 Thunderbolt 4 接口、一个传输速率超过 800 MB/s 的高速 microSD-Express 读卡器以及 Wi-Fi 7。 不过,该Wi-Fi 7模块仅支持160 MHz而非320 MHz,因此传输速率约为1.8-2.3 Gbps。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (SanDisk microSD Express 256 GB) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32.9 - 569, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (SanDisk microSD Express 256 GB) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (74.7 - 817, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Networking | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
显示屏——8英寸IPS屏,支持120 Hz刷新率和可变刷新率(VRR)
微星(MSI)仍沿用了此前Claw 8 AI+上那块8英寸触摸屏(1920 x 1200像素,16:10),支持120 Hz刷新率和可变刷新率(VRR)。 这意味着您将获得极佳的画质且完全没有PWM闪烁,但响应时间和整体画质仍不及联想的 Legion Go 2 OLED屏幕。在高亮画面下,画面会略显颗粒感,但在正常观看距离下几乎难以察觉。
我们使用专业CalMAN软件进行的分析显示,与前代机型相比并无意外。最大亮度约为540尼特,黑电平值仍保持在0.36的良好水平,从而实现了约1500:1的出色对比度。 不过,出厂校准显示画面存在明显的蓝偏,且色温偏冷,这有助于提升最大亮度。我们自行进行的校准(下载链接见下方框内)显著改善了灰度和色彩准确度,尽管这会使最大亮度降低约40尼特。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 539 cd/m²
Contrast: 1497:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
71.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
CCT: 7724 K
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM PN8007QB1-2, , 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz | Lenovo Legion Go 2 AMS881KB01-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 8.8", 144 Hz | Asus ROG Xbox Ally X TL070FVXS01_0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz | GPD Pocket 4 YHB03P24, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz | MSI Claw 8 AI+ PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 26% | -5% | 2% | 20% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 69.4 | 99.7 44% | 66 -5% | 71.1 2% | 92.7 34% | 71.1 2% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99 | 100 1% | 93.1 -6% | 99.8 1% | 99.6 1% | 98.5 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 71.5 | 94.6 32% | 68.3 -4% | 73 2% | 90 26% | 72.9 2% |
| Response Times | 95% | 34% | -31% | -51% | -30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 21 ? | 0.57 ? 97% | 11.4 ? 46% | 28.1 ? -34% | 27.9 ? -33% | 23.7 ? -13% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 10.2 ? | 0.7 ? 93% | 8 ? 22% | 13 ? -27% | 17.2 ? -69% | 14.9 ? -46% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 720 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 30 | |||||
| Screen | 9% | -1% | 4% | -12% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 539 | 488 -9% | 490 -9% | 540 0% | 511.2 -5% | 524 -3% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 527 | 493 -6% | 459 -13% | 530 1% | 524 -1% | 514 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 98 8% | 86 -5% | 90 -1% | 84 -8% | 93 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.36 | 0.33 8% | 0.34 6% | 0.4 -11% | 0.33 8% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1497 | 1485 -1% | 1588 6% | 1278 -15% | 1588 6% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 2.5 24% | 2.8 15% | 2.9 12% | 4.54 -38% | 3.5 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.8 | 4.9 28% | 6.5 4% | 6.1 10% | 8.96 -32% | 7.3 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 1.4 -17% | 1.5 -25% | 1.3 -8% | 0.95 21% | 1.3 -8% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 3.3 38% | 4.2 21% | 4.7 11% | 6.4 -21% | 5.9 -11% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.18 101% | 2.26 97% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 7724 84% | 6459 101% | 7381 88% | 7507 87% | 8125 80% | 7852 83% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 43% /
28% | 9% /
3% | -8% /
-1% | -14% /
-11% | -10% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.1 ms rise | |
| ↘ 6.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7794 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能——Arc G3 Extreme 与 Arc B390
测试条件
处理器性能
英特尔的Arc G3 Extreme是一款基于当前Panther Lake架构的专用掌上电脑处理器。与笔记本电脑芯片相比,它仅配备两个P核(共计14个核心),因此CPU的原始性能略低。 此外还有其他一些变化,例如显示输出接口数量减少,但这对于游戏掌机而言几乎无关紧要。就纯粹的CPU性能而言,测试结果表现良好,而且如果想将Claw连接至扩展坞作为日常电脑使用,其性能也完全足够。
Cinebench R15 多循环测试
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (575 - 956, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (99.2 - 120, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4953 - 16841, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1071 - 2006, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1904 - 6577, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (390 - 787, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (855 - 2533, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (155.1 - 304, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (189 - 588, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (23417 - 66618, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3675 - 6143, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3950 - 13426, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1333 - 2904, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3932 - 13086, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (875 - 2134, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6.21 - 20.8, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41.1 - 92.8, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.4167 - 0.756, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| GPD Pocket 4 -1! | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 -1! | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM -2! | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM -1! | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme -1! | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6544 - 26450, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (36464 - 103637, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1157 - 4484, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41744 - 107867, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4023 - 16980, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19153 - 55457, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18552 - 119040, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (356 - 1112, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3585 - 14181, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (v6.92.6600) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19472 - 59897, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (n=1last 2 years) | |
系统和存储设备
Claw 8 EX Ai+ 是一款响应迅速的系统,一旦完成所有设置,Windows 在新的 Xbox 模式下通过触摸屏运行也十分流畅。在测试过程中,我们未遇到任何稳定性问题。固态硬盘(Micron 2500 1 TB,剩余空间 887 GB)的性能非常出色且稳定。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3592 - 9701, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7542 - 11262, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5015 - 19236, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3326 - 12612, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (865 - 1881, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (878 - 1719, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (891 - 2150, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (759 - 1677, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (170.3 - 325, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (134.4 - 291, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (428 - 931, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9701 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (33517 - 107929, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25476 - 103022, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25595 - 117883, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (99.8 - 147.6, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average Intel Arc G3 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (441 - 3021, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
GPU 和游戏性能
这显然是最重要的方面,而 Arc G3 Extreme 搭载了 Arc B390 GPU ,拥有12个Xe核心,但最高时钟频率被限制在2.3 GHz(相比之下,笔记本芯片为2.5 GHz)。 由于时钟频率较低且TDP受限,其性能相比其他B390集成显卡略低(平均低5%),但依然表现出色,比搭载Ryzen Z2 Extreme或 Lunar Lake 版 MSI Claw 8的竞品高出约50-60%。
游戏性能同样出色且稳定,但真正的亮点在于多帧生成技术。强大的GPU性能与帧生成技术的结合,使得在支持该功能的游戏中,即使采用最高效的“耐力”功耗 配置,也能实现惊人的帧率表现。《赛博朋克2077》便是令人印象深刻的范例:在“耐力”模式下 ,我们成功以1200p分辨率、极高画质设置及4倍帧生成技术,保持约90帧/秒的运行,此时SoC功耗仅为14瓦(系统总功耗约21瓦), 因此,在这些设置下,电池续航时间可达近4小时。游戏运行如丝般顺滑,我们未察觉到任何卡顿。
英特尔“耐力游戏”模式是另一项值得关注的特性,它可设置固定的帧率上限(30、40 或 60 fps),据称能降低功耗。不过这两项功能无法同时启用,我们很快会提供更全面的测试数据。
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 -1! | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 -1! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18189 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13235 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6619 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1347 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 5562 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (290 - 1026, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (282 - 409, n=11) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 -1! | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ -1! | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (11.5 - 91.4, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (13.5 - 118.8, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (14 - 39.1, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (17.9 - 49.2, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32.8 - 91.9, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30.8 - 102, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (22.7 - 50.5, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 170.5 | 165.1 | 88.3 | 39.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 123.7 | 92.8 | 107.5 | 102 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 114.6 | 69.6 | 49.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 50.3 | 45.9 | 37.5 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 318 | 122.5 | 105.5 | 91.9 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 66.2 | 51 | 44.3 | 44.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 70.5 | 55 | 46.1 | 39.6 |
排放与能耗
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 33.9 / 33.9 / 33.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 42.3 / 43.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM Arc G3 Extreme, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Lenovo Legion Go 2 Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M | Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M | MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M | GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 14% | 10% | 15% | 7% | 12% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.5 | 24.7 -1% | 24.2 1% | 24 2% | 22.8 7% | 24.7 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 33.9 | 24.7 27% | 24.2 29% | 24 29% | 25.8 24% | 24.7 27% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 33.9 | 24.7 27% | 24.2 29% | 24 29% | 25.8 24% | 24.7 27% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 33.9 | 24.7 27% | 29 14% | 29 14% | 31 9% | 28.9 15% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 42.3 | 39.7 6% | 41.4 2% | 39.1 8% | 47 -11% | 37.3 12% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 42.3 | 39.7 6% | 43.4 -3% | 36.6 13% | 43.3 -2% | 41.4 2% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 43.5 | 39.7 9% | 43.4 -0% | 39.1 10% | 45.1 -4% | 41.4 5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度完全不是问题,因为握把始终非常凉爽,只有在游戏过程中中央部位会明显发热。热气会从顶部边缘排出,因此不会出现皮肤接触的问题。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 37.9 °C / 100 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 32.4 °C / 90.3 F (-8.7 °C / -15.7 F).
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM Arc G3 Extreme, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Lenovo Legion Go 2 Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M | Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M | MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M | GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -23% | -15% | -15% | -1% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 39.4 | 42.9 -9% | 40.8 -4% | 39.2 1% | 33.8 14% | 36.6 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 32.9 | 35.8 -9% | 40.8 -24% | 37 -12% | 35.2 -7% | 34.8 -6% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27.3 | 38.2 -40% | 29.9 -10% | 30 -10% | 26.6 3% | 27.5 -1% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 25.1 | 33.1 -32% | 30.6 -22% | 34.9 -39% | 28.6 -14% | 27.2 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
演讲嘉宾
扬声器的表现依然非常出色,Claw 8 EX AI+ 配备了手持设备中顶尖的音响系统之一。
MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Go 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Xbox Ally X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
GPD Pocket 4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
功耗
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM Arc G3 Extreme, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, , 1920x1200, 8" | Lenovo Legion Go 2 Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 1920x1200, 8.8" | Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M, Samsung MZVMA1T0HCLD, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -19% | -3% | 3% | -8% | 10% | 5% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 6.4 | 7.1 -11% | 3.7 42% | 5.3 17% | 6 6% | 3.2 50% | 3.94 ? 38% | 6.04 ? 6% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 9.1 | 10.7 -18% | 6.1 33% | 8.7 4% | 8.8 3% | 6.3 31% | 5.94 ? 35% | 8.46 ? 7% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 9.6 | 11.3 -18% | 6.2 35% | 9.1 5% | 9.2 4% | 6.6 31% | 8.68 ? 10% | 10.2 ? -6% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 40.2 | 50.2 -25% | 56.1 -40% | 42.2 -5% | 53.1 -32% | 40.6 -1% | 45 ? -12% | 44.1 ? -10% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 40.6 | 51.1 -26% | 55 -35% | 37.6 7% | 45.7 -13% | 46.7 -15% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 40.1 | 51.4 -28% | 54.5 -36% | 35.5 11% | 50.1 -25% | 47 -17% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 55.3 | 58.6 -6% | 66.4 -20% | 64 -16% | 56.4 -2% | 59.3 -7% | 80.8 ? -46% | 58.3 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗测试:《赛博朋克》/压力测试
外部显示器的功耗
电池续航时间
Notebookcheck 评分
MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM
- 06/23/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM Intel Arc G3 Extreme ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $999.00 msi Claw PC Gaming Handheld:... 2. $15.19 Spigen Tempered Glass Screen... 3. $1,229.99 EXCaliberPC [2025] MSI Claw ... List Price: 1649€ | 786 g | 48 mm | 8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI | |
| Lenovo Legion Go 2 AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $633.50 Lenovo Legion Go S - 2025 - ... 2. $984.99 Lenovo Legion Go S 2TB SSD A... 3. $904.99 Lenovo Legion Go S 8APU1 120... List Price: 1500€ | 922 g | 42.25 mm | 8.80" 1920x1200 257 PPI OLED | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 899€ | 718 g | 50.9 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI IPS | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 999€ | 765 g | 24 mm | 8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI IPS | |
| GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,475.95 List Price: 1400 USD | 777 g | 22.2 mm | 8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI IPS | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 999€ | 793 g | 30 mm | 8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

























































