结论 - 比以往更环保、更精简
Core Ultra X7 CPU 和 Arc B390 GPU 的速度分别比令人失望的 Core Ultra 5 或 Ultra 7 快了 70% 和 150%,而且无需运行任何暖机程序。在撰写本文时,这种更高端的配置可能要多花 400 美元,但它的内存(从 16 GB 增加到 32 GB)和存储容量(从 512 GB 增加到 1 TB)都增加了一倍,尤其值得图形编辑或内容创作者考虑。
如果想获得更强的动力,但效率较低,用户可以考虑去年采用箭湖技术的 戴尔 16 Premium它的多线程性能比顶级的 2026 XPS 16 配置还要快 20%,图形性能快 60%。但要注意的是,老款戴尔 16 Premium 的设计需要更厚更重的结构来容纳 Nvidia GPU。
观察到的节流行为表明,CPU 可能会受益于更强的冷却解决方案。当压力过大时,核心温度会达到 100 摄氏度,然后再调低时钟频率以控制温度。竞争产品 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra采用相同的 Panther Lake X7 处理器,能够维持更高的时钟频率,性能比戴尔更快。
同时,在上述 400 美元的基础上,豪华 OLED 面板还需额外支付 150 美元。与酷睿 Ultra X7 CPU 升级相比,我们不太建议升级显示屏,因为基本的 IPS 面板在色彩、对比度和刷新率方面已经相当出色。对于 CPU 和 GPU 所针对的编辑和多媒体级别而言,IPS 面板应该足以满足大多数预算有限的用户的需求。
Pros
Cons
最近测试了 酷睿至尊 5 325 IPS 基本配置的基本配置后,我们现在准备测试酷睿至尊 X7 358H OLED 配置,看看价格更高的配置能带来哪些升级和优势。更高端的 SKU 值得多花 500 到 600 美元吗?
有关我们对新款 2026 XPS 16 物理特性的所有评论,请访问 这里.本页将重点介绍用户在选择该机型的 Core Ultra 5 或 Core Ultra X7 配置时可以期待的差异。
更多戴尔评测:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
OLED 配置比 IPS 配置略薄和轻,分别轻了近 1 毫米和 100 克。除此之外,两种配置完全相同。
连接性
交流
网络摄像头

可持续性
与戴尔现有产品组合中的大多数其他机型相比,新款 XPS 16 使用了更多的可回收材料。机身由 25% 至 75% 的回收铝、10% 的回收玻璃(用于 OLED 触摸屏)、50% 的钴(用于电池)、90% 的回收钢(用于键帽)和 100% 的回收材料(用于包装)组成。
显示屏
有两种显示方式可供选择:
- 1920 x 1200、100% sRGB、IPS、非触摸、1 - 120 Hz、亚光
- 3200 x 2000、100% DCI-P3、OLED、触摸屏、20 - 120 Hz、DisplayHDR 500、光面
OLED 选项比基本 IPS 面板有多项改进,包括更高的原生分辨率、更深的 P3 色彩、触摸屏功能、HDR500 支持和漆黑对比度。它还解决了基本 IPS 面板黑白响应时间相对较慢的问题,带来更简洁的用户体验。
不过,选择 OLED 会带来一些小问题,如功耗较高、脉宽调制和屏幕光泽度较强等。它的原生 3.2K 分辨率也明显低于旧款 XPS 16 上的 4K OLED 面板。 旧款 XPS 16 设计(3200 x 2000 对 3840 x 2400)。
根据我们的内部测量,OLED 面板在 SDR 模式下的最高亮度为 400 尼特,在 HDR 模式下为 500 尼特。因此,在显示 SDR 内容时,价格较低的 IPS 配置实际上比 OLED 配置略亮。因此,室外可视性并不一定比更亮的 OLED 显示屏更好。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 395.4 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.69 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
calibrated: 0.68
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
96.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
CCT: 6274 K
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 160WV1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 LG Philips 160WUX, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 16 9640 SDC4196, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3", 90 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro ATNA60HR05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 ATNA60HR04-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr BOE0C46, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -22% | -3% | -4% | -54% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.5 | 66.2 -33% | 98.3 -1% | 98.3 -1% | 39.2 -61% | |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 97.4 -3% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 57.7 -42% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 96.5 | 67.7 -30% | 87.8 -9% | 85.9 -11% | 40.5 -58% | |
| Response Times | -4418% | -12% | -49% | -19% | -3791% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.65 ? | 39.3 ? -5946% | 0.82 ? -26% | 0.51 ? 22% | 32.5 ? -4900% | |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.87 ? | 26 ? -2889% | 0.85 ? 2% | 0.41 ? 53% | 24.2 ? -2682% | |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240.2 ? | 360 ? | 240 ? | 1200 | ||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 31 | 100 -223% | 37 -19% | |||
| Screen | 1% | 6% | 34% | 5% | -91% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 395.4 | 534.6 35% | 366 -7% | 502 27% | 471.7 19% | 349.2 -12% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 392 | 515 31% | 367 -6% | 507 29% | 474 21% | 326 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 92 -3% | 96 1% | 97 2% | 98 3% | 86 -9% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.26 | 0.33 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.69 | 2.53 31% | 1.3 65% | 1 73% | 3.53 4% | 5.87 -59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.94 | 4.57 42% | 3.6 55% | 2.4 70% | 6.31 21% | 20.58 -159% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.68 | 1.26 -85% | 1 -47% | 3.04 -347% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.7 -42% | 2.2 -16% | 1.8 5% | 2.6 -37% | 2.6 -37% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.32 95% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6274 104% | 6860 95% | 6680 97% | 6435 101% | 6292 103% | 6411 101% |
| Contrast (:1) | 2056 | 1058 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1480% /
-741% | -3% /
1% | -6% /
4% | -7% /
2% | -1312% /
-699% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.43 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.44 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.36 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.29 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.2 Hz Amplitude: 31 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7914 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和戴尔优化大师设置为性能模式。
处理器
核心 Ultra X7 358H 酷睿至尊 X7 358H多线程性能比基本的 Core Ultra 5 325或 酷睿至尊 7 355配置相比,多线程性能提高了 60% 至 70%。遗憾的是,Turbo Boost 的持续性并不完美,如下图所示的 CineBench R15 xT 压力图,在最初的几个循环后,性能会下降约 15%。竞争对手 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra相比之下,采用相同 Core Ultra X7 CPU 的华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 可以维持更快的时钟频率和性能。
处理器 酷睿至尊 7 255H在多线程负载方面,旧款 Dell 16 Premium 的 Core Ultra 7 255H 明显快于新款 XPS 16 的 Core Ultra X7 358H。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 -1! | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 -1! | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro -1! | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 -1! | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (12221 - 17932, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (29930 - 89134, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (3910 - 4594, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (63425 - 63827, n=2) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (4735 - 7024, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (14716 - 47989, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (5127 - 66053, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (932 - 1179, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (6506 - 8968, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (30538 - 88154, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (4269 - 4475, n=4) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 -1! | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (8834 - 9880, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (10282 - 11263, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (13908 - 16780, n=5) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (13082 - 13847, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1884 - 2114, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1678 - 1898, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (2241 - 2529, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1560 - 1707, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (293 - 338, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (278 - 305, n=5) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (445 - 460, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9717 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (117565 - 132135, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (108413 - 118888, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (119858 - 134998, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (84.6 - 93.2, n=5) | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了 Kioxia BG7而不是我们的 Core Ultra 5 配置上的 BG8 或 BG6 或 2025 戴尔 16 Premium的 BG8 或 BG6。它们的性能几乎相同,最大持续传输速率约为 7000 MB/s。
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
集成的 Arc B390比基本的 图形 4 Xe3配置中的基础图形 4 Xe3 要快得多。它是 2026 XPS 16 可用的最快 GPU,因为 Nvidia 独立选件已无法配置。用户可以期待原始性能比 Graphics 4 Xe3 提升 2.5 倍,或者与配备了 RTX 4070显卡相比,原始性能将下降 30%。不过,它的性能足以在中等设置下以 1080p 运行大多数现代游戏,包括《黑色神话:悟空传》。
在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行不会对性能产生明显影响。同时,如下表Fire Strike 所示,使用电池电量运行时,性能最多会略微降低 10%。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 17018 | 22086 | 4859 |
| 均衡模式 | 16785 (-1%) | 22887 (+4%) | 4467 (-8%) |
| 电池供电 | 15685 (-8%) | 20760 (-6%) | 4269 (-12%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18263 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39015 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13997 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7436 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 182 | 176.1 | 103.3 | 45.2 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 112.9 | 91.6 | 100.2 | 96.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 131.1 | 79.7 | 56.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 55.9 | 47.6 | 38.8 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 359 | 130.5 | 104 | 90.6 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 72.3 | 62.3 | 55.6 | 54.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 80.4 | 65.4 | 56 | 48.7 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 142.7 | 135.3 | 103.4 | 36.8 |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 47 | 37 | 29 | 16 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.4 / 23.4 / 25.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 38 / 48.6 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -5% | 2% | -7% | 13% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.3 | 22.8 2% | 24.5 -5% | 25.3 -9% | 24.6 -6% | 23.3 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.4 | 22.9 2% | 24.5 -5% | 25.3 -8% | 24.6 -5% | 23.5 -0% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.4 | 22.9 2% | 24.5 -5% | 25.3 -8% | 24.6 -5% | 23.5 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.8 | 23.9 7% | 27.5 -7% | 25.3 2% | 26.8 -4% | 24.4 5% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 38 | 34.8 8% | 39.6 -4% | 31.8 16% | 32.8 14% | 25.8 32% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 38.1 | 38 -0% | 38.4 -1% | 51.8 -36% | 26.2 31% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 48.6 | 43.3 11% | 49.7 -2% | 38.4 21% | 51.8 -7% | 39 20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 49.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.3 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+3.1 °C / 5.6 F).
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | -7% | 3% | -12% | 6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40.6 | 43.8 -8% | 39.4 3% | 37.8 7% | 34.4 15% | 28 31% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 39.8 | 42 -6% | 36.9 7% | 40.1 -1% | 41.4 -4% | 33.2 17% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 23.2 | 23.2 -0% | 28.2 -22% | 22.6 3% | 28.6 -23% | 24.6 -6% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 23.8 | 23.6 1% | 27.4 -15% | 22.8 4% | 31.8 -34% | 27.8 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会提升至 2.9 GHz、69 W 和 100 C,几秒钟后又降至 2.2 GHz、40 W 和 78 C,这表明 Turbo Boost 的持续性有限。这种节流与上面的 CineBench R15 xT 循环结果和下面的功耗行为相辅相成。
也许更值得注意的是,负载情况下的核心温度比 XPS 16 配置较慢的 Core Ultra 5 低。运行 Prime95 和Cyberpunk 2077 时,CPU 的温度分别稳定在 78 C 和 68 C,而 Core Ultra 5 XPS 16 则分别为 86 C 和 89 C。
| CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 44 |
| Prime95 压力 | 2.1 | 900 | 78 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.7 | 1350 | 71 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.87 | 2150 | 68 |
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, , OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL8512HFLU-00BLL, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | -70% | 25% | -142% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4 | 1.3 67% | 7.7 -93% | 2.5 37% | 6.8 -70% | 4.8 -20% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4.4 | 4.5 -2% | 10.3 -134% | 4.2 5% | 20.1 -357% | 9.4 -114% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 10.2 | 4.6 55% | 10.6 -4% | 4.6 55% | 21.6 -112% | 9.7 5% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 44.2 | 36.5 17% | 76.5 -73% | 42.2 5% | 87.6 -98% | 41.8 5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 62.6 | 47.9 23% | 52.7 16% | 148.2 -137% | 39.5 37% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 62.4 | 45.4 27% | 40.6 35% | 147.9 -137% | 35.9 42% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 94.6 | 82.8 12% | 138.5 -46% | 70.8 25% | 173.5 -83% | 66.1 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 126.4 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
Core Ultra X7 3.2K OLED 芯片的运行时间明显比 Core Ultra 5 FHD IPS 芯片短一半以上,即使启用了 Windows VRR 也是如此。虽然对于大多数人来说,10 多个小时仍然绰绰有余,但两者之间的差异非常明显。
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3, 70 Wh | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3, 78 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 84 Wh | HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 59 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 158% | 2% | 58% | 4% | -8% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 10.3 | 26.6 158% | 10.5 2% | 16.3 58% | 10.7 4% | 9.5 -8% |
| H.264 (h) | 16.5 | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.5 |
笔记本检查评级
Core Ultra X7 XPS 16 的配置要比性能较差的 Core Ultra 5 或 Ultra 7 更加引人注目。与去年的戴尔 16 Premium 相比,该机型放弃了性能,但外观却更薄、更精干、更高效。
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H
- 04/11/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $2,229.99 Dell XPS 16 9640 Laptop | In... 2. $2,699.00 Dell XPS 16 9640 16.3" Touch... 3. $1,459.00 Dell XPS 13 9340 AI Powered ... List Price: 2350 USD | 1.7 kg | 14.62 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Intel Core Ultra 5 325 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1600 USD | 1.7 kg | 15.4 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 2.3 kg | 18.7 mm | 16.30" 3840x2400 139 PPI OLED | ||
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 2199€ | 1.6 kg | 11.9 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10 RTX 5050 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1800 USD | 2 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr Intel Core Ultra 7 255U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) ⎘ 16 GB Memory | List Price: 660 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.6 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.














































































